Antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy of internal spermatic veins for varicocele treatment: technique, complications, and results

Percutaneous Anterograde Varicocele Embolization: Technique and Clinical Outcomes

Transcatheter retrograde testicular vein embolization for symptomatic varicoceles is well-established but has a documented failure rate. Percutaneous anterograde varicocele embolization may be a suitable alternative. A retrospective observational, descriptive study of consecutive patients who had undergone unsuccessful retrograde embolization attempts underwent percutaneous anterograde varicocele embolization at a single center was performed. Twenty patients (16 adults and 4 adolescents) underwent unilateral varicocele treatment. Technical success rate was 100%. Mean fluoroscopy time was 106.5 seconds (SD ± 24.9). For patients treated for subfertility, mean DNA fragmentation index significantly decreased from 29.4% (SD ± 4.5%) to 22.0% (SD ± 2.5%) preprocedurally and postprocedurally, respectively. No clinical or radiologic evidence of varicocele recurrence was detected at 1- and 2-year follow-up. Four patients (20%) experienced self-limiting pain. No major adverse events occurred. Percutaneous anterograde varicocele embolization appears to be safe with high technical and clinical success rates. Radiation dose may be lower than that with retrograde embolization.

Efficacy and safety of antegrade sclerotherapy for varicocele in pediatric patients: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Antegrade sclerotherapy (Tauber's) procedure has been extensively used for the minimally-invasive treatment of varicocele; however, the results in the pediatric population are less defined. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of antegrade sclerotherapy for varicocele in the pediatric population.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Systematic research of available literature in English language from 1980 until May 2022 was conducted through EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and NIH Registry of Clinical Trials. For each study, information was gathered regarding the study design, the inclusion/exclusion criteria, the indications for treatment, the success rate and the complications. When available, the details about sperm analysis were reported.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The 10 studies were included in the final sample (564 patients). Median age of patients ranged 13.3-15.3 years. The indications for scleroembolization varied in the different studies, while most studies included patients with clinical G2-G3 varicocele and clinical symptoms or testicular asymmetry. The treatment was successful in 88%-98% of the patients, while the complication rate was <5%.

CONCLUSION

Tauber's sclerotherapy is a safe and effective treatment for varicocele also in the pediatric population. Further studies with standardized inclusion criteria are needed to provide higher level of evidence and compare the outcomes of antegrade sclerotherapy with the other available techniques.

[Varicocele and male infertility]

BACKGROUND

Varicocele is the most common correctable cause of male infertility. It was the subject of recent Association française d'urologie (AFU) Comité d'andrologie et de médecine sexuelle (CAMS) recommendations. Since then, the literature has provided additional information. This review will comprehensively reassess current indications for the treatment of varicocele, and revisit contemporary issues in the light of current advances.

METHODS

Update of the literature search carried out as part of the CAMS recommendations for the period between 2020 and 2023.

RESULTS

Microsurgical sub-inguinal varicocelectomy remains the surgical treatment of choice for infertile men with clinical varicocele and abnormal sperm parameters. It offers recurrence rates of less than 4%. It significantly improves both natural and in vitro fertilization live birth and pregnancy rates, as well as sperm count, total and progressive motility, morphology and DNA fragmentation rates. All in all, it modifies the MPA strategy in around one in two cases. Varicocele grade and bilaterality are predictive of improved sperm parameters and pregnancy rate. Treatment of subclinical varicocele is not recommended. Complications are rare, notably hydroceles (0.5%), unilateral testicular atrophy due to arterial damage (1/1000), hematomas, delayed healing and postoperative pain. Retrograde embolization is an alternative to surgery.

CONCLUSION

Whenever possible, the urologist should present and discuss treatment options for varicocele with the MPA team and the patient, taking a personalized approach.

Varicocele: To Treat or Not to Treat?

Varicocele treatment in infertility still remains controversial. It is clear, in fact, that in many patients, varicocele has no impact on fertility. Recent scientific evidence demonstrated that varicocele treatment is beneficial in improving semen parameters and pregnancy rate when an appropriate selection of patients is made. The purpose of treating varicocele in adults is mainly to improve current fertility status. On the other hand, the goal of treatment in adolescents is to prevent testicular injury and maintain testicular function for future fertility. Hence, the key to the success of varicocele treatment seems to be a correct indication. The aim of this study is to review and summarize current evidence in managing varicocele treatment focusing on the controversies regarding surgical indications in adolescent and adult patients, and in other specific situations such as azoospermia, bilateral or subclinical varicocele, and prior to ART.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic varicocelectomy in a pediatric population

PURPOSE

To present our experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic varicocelectomy in a pediatric population.

METHODS

We reviewed 49 consecutive cases performed by the same experienced surgeon. One-to-four veins were ligated at the internal ring of the inguinal canal, while the testicular artery and lymphatics were spared. Information on patient characteristics, surgical time, complications, and recurrences were collected.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 14 (range 10-17) years. Forty-eight had left-sided varicoceles and one had a bilateral varicocele. Forty-five were grade 3. All patients were referred due to discomfort/pain and 20 also had reduced testicular size. The median operating time from skin incision was 48 min (31-89 min) and the median console time was 18 min (7-55 min). Forty-seven patients were discharged the same day. Two patients experienced pain and problems urinating, respectively. These issues had resolved by the first post-operative day. There were no other complications, but at 6 months, eight recurrences were noted (16%). Scrotal complaints had subsided in all patients. Catch-up growth of the affected testicles was seen in 19/20 cases.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted laparoscopic varicocelectomy is feasible and safe in a pediatric population but with a relatively high recurrence rate.

Case report of testicular failure and azoospermia after antegrade embolization of varicocele: A rare complication

INTRODUCTION

Varicocele is a common condition affecting males of reproductive age and accounting for the most frequent cause of secondary infertility in males.

PRESENTATION

A young male presented with second infertility and bilateral varicoceles and underwent antegrade angioembolization. He developed testicular ischemia and testicular failure with new onset hypogonadism and cryptozoospermia.

CONCLUSION

Antegrade embolization is a valid option in patients with varicoceles but has its own unique risks of complications.

Varicoceles: Overview of Treatment from a Radiologic and Surgical Perspective

A testicular varicocele is the result of the expansion of the venous pampiniform plexus of the scrotum. Often painless, a significant number of patients experience orchialgia, swelling, testicular atrophy, and abnormalities in spermatic parameters. Treatment of symptomatic varicocele involves a radiologic or surgical intervention to obstruct the reflux of venous drainage. Testicular anatomy, diagnostic evaluation and imaging, options for surgical intervention, and a step-by-step description of retrograde embolization and antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy are discussed. Furthermore, included is an overview of postprocedural management and patient outcomes for radiological interventions, and the most up-to-date evidence on the efficacy of varicocele treatments as well as how they compare to each other.

Minimally Invasive Total Extraperitoneal Varicocele Repair: First Description in Children

Introduction: The aim of this study was to report the first pediatric case series treated with minimally invasive total extraperitoneal varicocele (MITEV) repair using the total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach. Materials and Methods: Five male adolescents (12-17 years) were included in this study, all with left-sided Grade III varicoceles. A 5 mm camera port was inserted just below the umbilicus and two 5 mm working ports were used, one above the symphysis in the midline and the other in the left lateral hemiabdomen just below the arcuate line. Results: Operation time ranged from 47 to 61 minutes (mean: 53 minutes). There were no intra- or postoperative complications. The peritoneum was not perforated, and the abdominal cavity was not entered. Two patients had resolution from varicoceles on follow-up clinical examination and ultrasonography was performed 6 months after surgery. In 3 patients, long-term follow-up was pending. Conclusion: MITEV repair reflects a new minimally invasive access to the retroperitoneum in children with varicocele.

[Recommendations of the Committee of Andrology and Sexual Medicine of the AFU concerning the management of Varicocele]

The diagnosis of varicocele is clinical, carried out in supine and standing position and in Valsalva maneuver. Only clinical varicoceles have to be treated. A scrotal ultrasound with Doppler is generally performed as part of the infertile man's evaluation or in case of examination difficulties. The main indication for varicocele treatment is the adult man with clinical varicocele and abnormalities of sperm parameters, in a context of infertility of couple, with a partner having a satisfactory ovarian reserve and no cause of female infertility or a curable infertility cause. The decision to treat varicocele must therefore be taken after evaluation of the two partners of the couple. Adults with symptomatic varicocele and those with spermogram abnormalities may also be offered a cure for their varicocele even in the absence of a paternity plan, as well as adolescents with reduced testicular growth, an ipsilateral decrease testicular volume, or a size gradient between the 2 testes. The cure of varicocele can be carried out by surgery or by percutaneous embolization. Microsurgery (inguinal or subinguinal) offers lower rates of recurrence and complications than high surgical approaches (laparoscopic or not) and surgeries without magnification. It is therefore the reference surgical technique. Percutaneous retrograde embolization is a minimally invasive alternative to microsurgery offering satisfactory outcomes with rare and often benign complications. The cure for varicocele results in an improvement in sperm parameters and recent data seem to confirm that it increases the natural pregnancy rate. These results appear after a delay of 3 to 9 months (at least 1 to 2 cycles of spermatogenesis). When the sperm involvement was severe (azoospermia, severe oligospermia), the improvement of the spermogram allow (1) to avoid surgery testicular sperm extraction or (2) perform intrauterine insemination rather than ICSI.

Comparison of scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy and laparoscopic Palomo surgery in treatment of adolescent varicocele: A 15-year review

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE

Varicocele is a common condition seen in adolescence and associated with adult subfertility. Numerous types of intervention have been described with differences in success and complication rates. This study aims to review and compare the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic Palomo surgery and scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy at our center.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis was done of all patients younger than 18 years old with idiopathic varicocele treated operatively between February 2001 and December 2016. Demographics such as age at operation, side, varicocele grade, operative date, and types of operation were collected. Primary outcomes were clinical recurrence, defined as any grading noted on follow-up within 1 year post-op and post-operative hydrocele. Secondary outcomes were operative time, length of stay, and other surgical complications. Mann-Whitney U test, independent t test and chi-square tests were used for analysis. All p-values were two-sided and considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients fit the criteria, of whom 117 patients were included in data analysis (Table). Sixty-two patients had laparoscopic Palomo surgery (LPS) and 55 had scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy (SAS). Clinical recurrence (grade 2-3) within 1 year was similar between the two groups, with four out of 48 patients in the SAS group and six out of 62 patients in the LPS group (8.4% in SAS vs. 9.7% in LPS, p = 1.00). Of the 11 patients who had recurrence in the SAS group, seven had grade 1 recurrence (14.5%), two (4.2%) had grade 2 recurrence, and two (4.2%) had grade 3 recurrence. For the LPS group, 17 out of 62 patients had clinical recurrence within 1 year, of whom 11 (17.7%) had grade 1 recurrence, one (1.6%) had grade 2, and five (8.1%) had grade 3 recurrence. Post-operative hydrocele was significantly higher in the LPS group; there was none in the SAS group but 11 patients in the LPS group (0% in SAS vs. 17.7%, p = 0.002). Three patients had clinically significant hydrocele requiring Jaboulays' procedure. Complications other than hydrocele were noted in three patients in the SAS group and one patient in the LPS group (5.5% in SAS vs. 1.6% in LPS, p = 0.158). None required operative intervention. No conversion to open procedure was seen in the LPS group and there were no perioperative complications. Mean operative time was 62.9 min in the SAS group and 60.7 min in the LPS group (p = 0.624). Mean length of stay was 17.5 h in the SAS group and 31.7 h in the LPS group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both SAS and LPS are safe procedures for treatment of adolescent varicocele with similar clinical recurrence rate within 1 year. SAS has a significantly lower rate of post-operative hydrocele.

Retroperitoneal Varix ligation with sclerotherapy: a prospective randomized comparative study

Introduction

The aim of this article is to compare the results of high varix ligation with and without sclerotherapy.

Material and methods

Between November 2014 and December 2015, sixty patients with varicocele were included in this study. Patients were divided into two equal groups; group I (underwent high varix ligation), and group II (underwent high varix ligation with a retrograde injection of 2 mL of 5% ethanolamine oleate in the lower end of the bisected gonadal vein). The operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, postoperative pain, improvement of semen parameters, incidence of recurrence and achieving of unassisted pregnancy were recorded for both groups.

Results

The age range was 19-34 years in group I and 21-37 years in group II. The operative time was shorter in group I (34.6 ±7.81 min) than group II (43.3 ±8.5 min) (P <0.001), which was statistically significant.Improvement of semen parameters and the occurrence of spontaneous pregnancy were insignificant between both groups. No intraoperative complications occurred. The postoperative complications were statistically insignificant in both groups.

Conclusions

Combined varix ligation with retrograde sclerotherapy does not offer significant advantages over high varix ligation alone with a longer operative time and prolonged post-operative pain.

Varicocele and male infertility: current concepts and future perspectives

This Special Issue of Asian Journal of Andrology is fully dedicated to the thematic area of Varicocele, which has been one of the most controversial issues in the field of Urology, Andrology, and Reproductive Medicine. Recognized as a clinical entity for over a century, varicocele from Latin: varix (dilated vein) and from Greek: kele (tumor) still elicits heated debate among scientists and clinicians on an arguable negative effect on male fertility and gonadal function and has fueled thousands of scholarly articles since its first report in the 18^th century.

Afterword to varicocele and male infertility: current concepts and future perspectives

We summarize and comment on the topics discussed by the contributors to this Special Issue of Asian Journal of Andrology. The scope of varicocele covers a wide spectrum, including proteomics and metabolomics, hormonal control, interventional therapy, and assisted reproductive technology (ART). The selection of topics demonstrates the exciting breadth of this thematic area and the opportunity research holds for both increasing the understanding and improving the reproductive health of males with varicocele.