Relationship between patient satisfactions with diabetes care and treatment

Association of treatment satisfaction and physician trust with glycemic control among primary care patients with type 2 diabetes in Egypt

Objectives

To evaluate the association of diabetes treatment satisfaction and trust in family physicians with glycemic control among primary care patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

A cross-sectional study on 319 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from five primary healthcare centers in Egypt. Data were collected from February to August 2021 using a structured questionnaire that contained six parts: sociodemographic data, disease profile, the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ), 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), self-reported medication knowledge questionnaire (MKQ), and revised healthcare relationship trust scale (HCR). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to assess predictors of treatment satisfaction, physician trust, and HbA1c level. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

The mean age was 59.66 years (± 7.87 years) and 55.17% were females. Multiple linear regression analysis for predicting HbA1c showed that HbA1c level was lower in patients with higher treatment satisfaction scores (β =  - 0.289, p < 0.001) and higher medication adherence scores (β =  - 0.198, p = 0.001). Treatment satisfaction scores were positively predicted by higher physician trust scores (β = 0.301, p < 0.001), increased medication adherence scores (β = 0.160, p = 0.002), and longer duration of diabetes (β = 0.226, p < 0.001). Positive predictors for physician trust included HbA1c level (β = 0.141, p = 0.012), medication knowledge (β = 0.280, p < 0.001), diabetes treatment satisfaction (β = 0.366, p < 0.001) and medication adherence (β = 0.146, p = 0.011).

Conclusion

Optimizing diabetes treatment satisfaction and physician trust could have favorable associations with medication adherence and medication knowledge with a possible improvement in glycemic control. Family physicians should incorporate patients reported outcomes alongside traditional clinical measures in evaluating diabetes management in primary care.

Determinants of treatment satisfaction among patients with diabetes: multicentre cross-sectional study in Northwest Ethiopia

OBJECTIVE

Treatment satisfaction is a significant determinant of quality of care, especially for patients with chronic diseases such as diabetes. Identifying factors that contribute to treatment satisfaction may improve patient outcomes. This study examined treatment satisfaction and determinant factors in patients with diabetes.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A multicentre hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted between April and July 2022 at selected hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia.

PARTICIPANTS

Eligible adult patients with diabetes were included in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Treatment satisfaction was the main outcome and was measured using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, which was valid and reliable in the current sample. A linear regression analysis was used to determine the association between treatment satisfaction scores and independent variables.

RESULTS

Out of the 422 patients approached, 402 (95.3%) participated in the study. Overall, the mean treatment satisfaction score was 17.13 (±3.3) out of 30. Most of the participants had a lower degree of satisfaction with the current treatment (>52%) and its convenience (>63%). More than half of the participants (51.2%) perceived hyperglycaemia most of the time and hypoglycaemia some of the time (64.9%). Treatment satisfaction was influenced by body mass index (BMI) (p<0.01), number of medical conditions and medications (p<0.001), hyperglycaemia perception (p<0.001), healthcare cost coverage (p<0.001), monthly salary (p<0.001), self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) (p=0.017), lifestyle modification status (p<0.01), and comorbidity and/or complications (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Treatment satisfaction was low among patients with a higher BMI, a higher number of medical conditions and medications, comorbidities and/or complications, a frequent perception of hyperglycaemia and a lower monthly salary. Interventions addressing specific independent variables might enhance treatment satisfaction.

Investigation of treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life after add-on to metformin-based therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes

Background

The complexity of oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) regimens affects the quality of life (QOL) and treatment satisfaction. However, data on the QOL of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving metformin-based OAD treatment in Asia are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the QOL and treatment satisfaction and explore the influencing factors and their correlations among patients with T2DM receiving metformin-based OADs.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted at the Outpatient Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology at a medical center in Taiwan. Data were collected using the Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQoL) and the Chinese version of the Satisfaction with Oral Anti-Diabetic Agent Scale (C-SOADAS) questionnaires from patients with T2DM using metformin. The outcomes were analyzed by group and stratified based on the use of two, three, and more than three OADs. The level of agreement between the questionnaires was analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

Results

A total of 153 patients with T2DM using metformin were included in this study. The average weighted impact score in the ADDQoL was -2.11, with no significant differences between the three groups. The C-SOADAS score showed a significant difference between the groups using two, three, and more than three OADs (21.42 [1.98] vs. 20.43 [2.09] vs. 19.00 [2.24], p < 0.0001). The ADDQoL and C-SOADAS scores showed low correlations between patients' QOL and treatment satisfaction. However, the impact of diabetes on specific aspects of life was negatively correlated with the total C-SOADAS scores.

Conclusion

In Taiwan, a significantly greater effect on QOL was observed among patients with fewer OAD classes and higher treatment satisfaction. This study provides local evidence from self-reporting outcomes of patients with T2DM. Further studies focusing on different populations and treatment regimens for QOL are needed.

Factors Associated With Treatment Adherence and Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Management in Japan: Results From a Web-Based Questionnaire Survey

INTRODUCTION

To identify factors associated with treatment adherence and satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in Japan.

METHODS

A web-based questionnaire survey was conducted from 6 to 17 March 2019 in patients with T2DM aged ≥ 20 years receiving diabetes treatment. Treatment adherence and satisfaction were self-assessed/reported by the patients. A multiple logistic regression model and the chi-square test were used to assess associated factors.

RESULTS

Responders (N = 1000) were aged 63.8 (standard deviation 11.9) years, and 739 (73.9%) were male. Adherence to treatment was reported in 941 (94.1%) patients and was significantly associated with higher household income (odds ratio [OR] 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-3.86), age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07), employment (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.60) and having ≥ 1 impaired basic activity of daily living (BADL) (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.82). Satisfaction with treatment was reported by 575 (57.5%) and was significantly associated with receiving/understanding guidance on how pharmacologic therapies are tailored (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.19-2.51), male sex (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.10-2.19), higher household income (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.09-1.94) and age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.03). Treatment adherence was negatively associated with lower household income and having ≥ 1 impaired BADL in patients aged < 65 years, but not in those aged ≥ 65 years. Treatment satisfaction was positively associated with higher household income and receiving/understanding guidance on exercise therapy and the importance of achieving target haemoglobin A1c levels in patients aged ≥ 65 years, but with receiving/understanding guidance on the tailoring of pharmacologic therapies in patients aged < 65 years.

CONCLUSION

Lower age, lower household income, employment and impaired BADL may negatively impact treatment adherence in patients with T2DM. Appropriate physician guidance may promote treatment satisfaction. Differences in perspectives between patients aged < 65 and  those aged ≥ 65 years should be considered.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center, JapicCTI-194636.

Impact of medication therapy management service on selected clinical and humanistic outcomes in the ambulatory diabetes patients of Tikur Anbessa Specialist Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) patients are at increased risk of developing drug therapy problems (DTPs). The patients had a variety of comorbidities and complications, and they were given multiple medications. Medication therapy management (MTM) is a distinct service or group of services that optimize therapeutic outcomes for individual patients. The study assessed the impact of provision of MTM service on selected clinical and humanistic outcomes of diabetes patients at the diabetes mellitus clinic of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH).

METHODS

A pre-post interventional study design was carried out at DM clinic from July 2018 to April 2019. The intervention package included identifying and resolving drug therapy problems, counseling patients in person at the clinic or through telephone calls, and providing educational materials for six months. This was followed by four months of post-intervention assessment of clinical outcomes, DTPs, and treatment satisfaction. The interventions were provided by pharmacist in collaboration with physician and nurse. The study included all adult patients who had been diagnosed for diabetes (both type I & II) and had been taking anti-diabetes medications for at least three months. Patients with gestational diabetes, those who decided to change their follow-up clinic, and those who refused to participate in the study were excluded. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Descriptive statistics, t-test, and logistic regressions were performed for data analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 423 enrolled patients, 409 fulfilled the criteria and included in the final data analysis. The intervention showed a decrease in average hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting blood sugar (FBS), and systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 0.92%, 25.04 mg/dl, and 6.62 mmHg, respectively (p<0.05). The prevalence of DTPs in the pre- and post-intervention of MTM services was found to be 72.9% and 26.2%, respectively (p<0.001). The overall mean score of treatment satisfaction was 90.1(SD, 11.04). Diabetes patients of age below 40 years (92.84 (SD, 9.54)), type-I DM (93.04 (SD, 9.75)) & being on one medication regimen (93.13(SD, 9.17)) had higher satisfaction score (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Provision of MTM service had a potential to reduce DTPs, improve the clinical parameters, and treatment satisfaction in the post-intervention compared to the pre-intervention phase.

Assessment of treatment satisfaction and adherence amongst diabetic patients in governmental primary care clinic of Ramallah, West-Bank

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess treatment satisfaction and its association with medication adherence among patients with diabetes.

METHODS

Participants in this study were outpatients at the governmental Primary Healthcare Unit in Ramallah. Adherence was measured with the 4-item Morisky Green-Levine (MGL) questionnaire, and treatment satisfaction with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version 1.4. Glycemic control was measured as the last value of an HbA1c test, with HbA1c ≤7 considered good.

RESULTS

Of the participants, 220 (57.9%) were classified as having high adherence to their medications, and 160 (42.1%) as having low adherence. Regarding glycemic control, 174 (45.7%) of patients had good control, while 206 (54.2%) had poor control. Satisfaction with treatment effectiveness showed a significant mean difference with adherence level (78.61 vs. 74.2; p = 0.04). Glycemic controlled patients had a higher and significant adherence mean in the global satisfaction domain (69.19 vs. 62.08; p = 0.01). However, glycemic control level had no significant differences in means of effectiveness, side effects, and convenience domains (P = 0.31, 0.49, 0.37) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment satisfaction level is lower among low adherence and poor glycemic control. Addressing the specific needs of these patients might be effective in improving their satisfaction, thus having a positive influence on other clinical outcomes.

Quality of Life among Diabetics: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Tertiary Care Center of Rohtak, Haryana

Introduction:

The most severe health threats dominating the low- and middle-income countries are no longer the dreaded communicable diseases; but, they are everyday diseases due to changes in lifestyle, which are the noncommunicable diseases. Quality of life (QOL) is defined by the World Health Organization as an individual's perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards, and concerns. QOL assessment in health system is a multidimensional construct that can be measured by evaluating objective levels of health status filtered by the subjective perceptions and expectations of the individual.

Aim and Objective:

To assess the QOL among diabetics attending the endocrine outpatient department (OPD) in a tertiary care hospital of Haryana.

Materials and Methods:

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted at endocrinology OPD of Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana from May 2014 to April 2015. Five hundred diabetics (Type 1 and 2) were recruited for the study. Patients registered on the day of interview were selected using systematic random sampling. A predesigned, pretested, semi-structured schedule which included sociodemographic variables of the study participants along with information about family history of diabetes was filled by interviewing the study subjects in their vernacular language individually. Generic instrument, SF-36 v2 was used to assess the QOL.

Results:

The mean age of the study participants was 50.41 ± 9.1 years. The mean disease duration was 6.12 ± 5.55 years. Majority of our respondents belonged to Hindu religion (97.4%). The mean scores for the bodily pain domain (79.52 ± 28.15) and social functioning domain (76.47 ± 26.10) of QOL were the highest.

Conclusion:

The mean scores for the bodily pain domain and social functioning domain of QOL were the highest. Assess the QOL in patients with diabetes by measuring the multiple domains involving physical, psychological and social aspects.

Short-term impact of co-payment level increase on the use of medication and patient-reported outcomes in Finnish patients with type 2 diabetes

A new reimbursement scheme for non-insulin medications used for treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes (T2D) was implemented in Finland on January 1, 2017. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of this co-payment increase (i.e. + 35 percentage points) on patient-reported satisfaction for diabetes care, diabetes medication use, and financial difficulties. Baseline data were collected in 114 pharmacies, where patients with T2D were asked to fill in a questionnaire in November 2016. Follow-ups were conducted at 6 and 12 months. In total, 955 participants with T2D attended the baseline examination. During the follow-up, satisfaction with diabetes care decreased significantly (p < 0.001). Use of insulin increased (OR 1.16, 95 % CI 1.06-1.27) whereas use of metformin and DPP-4 inhibitors decreased (metformin: OR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.70‒0.90; DPP-4 inhibitors: OR 0.82, 95 % CI 0.73‒0.93). Financial difficulties with the purchase of diabetes medications were reported more often both at 6 (OR 2.44, 95 % CI 1.96-3.03) and at 12 months (OR 2.70, 95 % CI 2.18-3.35) than at baseline. These negative short-term effects require future studies. If persistent, the long-term effects of lower treatment satisfaction and increased financial difficulties may imply impaired metabolic control and increased diabetes complication risk and health care costs. Patient perspective should be taken into account in future policy making.

Diabetes Mellitus Versus Hypertension-Does Disease Affect Pharmacological Adherence?

The aim of the study was to answer the questions whether a chronic disease can have a significant impact on the level of adherence and whether there are differences in adherence-related predictors depending on the chronic disease. The study included 1,571 patients (mean age 64.7 ± 11.3) with chronic diseases [1,030 diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 and 541 hypertension (HA)]. Adherence was assessed using the Adherence Refills Medication Scale (ARMS). The average adherence score for the whole group was 18.9. Fifty-five percent of patients had a low level of adherence. A comparison between DM and HA shows a statistically significant difference and a higher level of adherence with pharmacological recommendations in the group of patients with type 2 DM (17.5 ± 12.0 vs 19.2 ± 8.0). In the single factors analysis, HA diagnosis had a statistically significant negative effect on adherence (β=0.92, p ≤ 0.001). In simple linear regression analysis, independent of chronic disease, a higher level of adherence was observed among women (β=-0.40, p=0.015), people with secondary education (β=-1.26, p ≤ 0.001), and inactive patients (β=-0.48; p=0.005). However, place of residence - countryside (β =0.35, p=0.044) and higher education (β=0.90, p ≤ 0.001) had a negative influence on the level of adherence. In multiple linear regression analysis HA (B=0.99; p ≤ 0.001), female gender (B=-0.47; p=0.003) and secondary education (B=-1.16; p ≤ 0.001) were important independent determinants of adherence. (1) Hypertension is an independent, statistically significant predictor that reduces the adherence level. (2) Female gender and higher education are the most important determinants improving adherence to pharmacological therapy. (3) There is a different pattern of predictors of adherence among patients: occupational activity plays an important role in DM, while education plays a role in HA.

Evaluation of Counseling Practices and Patient's Satisfaction Offered by Pharmacists for Diabetics Attending Outpatient Pharmacies in Al Ahsa

Introduction

Patient counseling can be helpful in improving the outcome of disease management, particularly chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, which is common in Saudi Arabia. The present study looks to investigate the levels of counseling and satisfaction among patients attending diabetic clinics in outpatient hospital pharmacy in Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.

Method

This is a cross-sectional investigation, carried out by using interview-structured questionnaire, targeting diabetes mellitus patients with or without comorbid states. The questionnaire was divided into 3 parts comprising of demographics, counseling types given while collecting prescription, and satisfaction rating of services provided.

Result

More males than females participated; most of whom were college graduates older than 51 years. Sixty-three percent of the entire participants are type 1 diabetic patients, while 37% are type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Coexistence of hypercholesterolemia was higher among type 1 diabetes patients with 51.9%, while hypertension was more common among type 2 diabetic patients representing 68.2%. Findings also showed that counseling was provided for medication use among type 1 diabetic patients but was deficient in the case of type 2 diabetic patients. Patients received low level of counseling on side effects and healthy lifestyle living. Satisfaction level was only 11.1%, indicating that counseling services might be deficient.

Conclusion

This study has revealed poor counseling practices and low satisfaction levels in services provided by outpatient hospital pharmacies to diabetic patients. In the face of increasing prevalence of diabetes and comorbidity, counseling of diabetic patients is critical.

Factors associated with treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using oral glucose-lowering agents: a cross-sectional study in urban districts in Japan

Various oral glucose-lowering agents are available in Japan. Although the objective characteristics of these drugs are well described, little is known about treatment satisfaction by patients using these agents. The aim of this study was to assess treatment satisfaction of diabetic patients visiting diabetes clinics using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) and to determine the association of the DTSQ scores with various factors including oral glucose-lowering agents. The study subjects were 754 outpatients who had been treated with one or more oral glucose-lowering agents, but not insulin or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist. The collected data included the response to DTSQ as completed by the patients, various parameters pertaining diabetes treatment including adherence, motivation, life style, social support, complications and cost burden from the patients and attending physicians. The associations among satisfaction scores and various parameters were analyzed by multiple linear regression analysis. In all subjects, use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) were positively, and irregular diet time were negatively associated with satisfaction scores significantly as well as some factors which had been previously reported to be associated. Subgroup analysis showed that adherence to diet and use of SGLT2i were positively in obese (body mass index ≥25 kg/m²), and HbA1c and irregular work time were negatively in non-obese (<25 kg/m²) patients associated with satisfaction scores. These results suggest that SGLT2i is really used with high satisfaction, especially by obese patients and that factors associated with treatment satisfaction might differ between obese and non-obese patients using oral glucose-lowering agents.

Assessing prevalence of and barriers to medication adherence in patients with uncontrolled diabetes attending primary healthcare clinics in Qatar

BACKGROUND

Studies conducted in Qatar have reported a high prevalence of diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy. These complications are often associated with poor medication adherence and uncontrolled diabetes. The objectives of this study were to determine the rate of medication adherence among patients with uncontrolled diabetes, and to compare the characteristics and identified barriers between patients with good and those with poor medication adherence.

METHOD

A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted among patients living in Qatar with uncontrolled diabetes attending primary healthcare clinics from October 2016 to January 2017. An interviewer-administered questionnaire comprising three sections was utilized in the study: patients' characteristics, Adherence to Refill and Medications Scale in Diabetes (ARMS-D), and barriers to medication adherence. ARMS-D is a validated tool that is used to identify adherence level among patients with diabetes. Descriptive and inferential statistics including regression analysis were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 260 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, 73% (n=191) were nonadherent to their diabetes medications (ARMS-D score above 11). Nonadherent patients reported the majority of the pre-determined barriers to medication adherence with forgetfulness being the most commonly reported barrier. Multivariate linear regression analysis found age, ethnicity, education level, income level and HbA1c to be independent predictors of adherence.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study reaffirm the notion that non-adherence to medications among patients with uncontrolled diabetes within primary care setting is higher than the general diabetes population. This high prevalence is concerning and necessitates urgent interventions. Nonetheless, an in-depth understanding of barriers to medication adherence often requires qualitative research approach as these barriers are very complex and multifactorial in nature.

Essential parameters and risk factors of the patients for diabetes care and treatment

AIM

The aim was to explore the association between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [T2DM] treatment satisfactions of patients regarding their socio-economic, life-style, history medication and clinical outcome in a Turkish population SUBJECT AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study conducted from February 2016 to September 2016. Of the total 1500 diabetic patients approached, 1094 (72.9%) gave their consent. Data analysis included, sociodemographic, serum lipid profiles (LDL, HDL), calcium, uric acid, blood pressure and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at baseline and after six months. The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) tools were used to measure the patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The mean and standard deviation of age among gender, there were significant differences between males (51.81±14.40) and females (49.76±13.99) (p=0.024). There were statistically significant differences between males and females regarding place of living (city 76% vs town 26%) p<0.001) and consanguinity (p=0.040). Almost of the patients with diabetes were overweight (males 44.5% vs females 41.8%) while more than a quarter (31.2%) males were obese. Among patients with diabetes, significantly larger proportion were treated for DM with insulin (females 28.8% vs males 22.5%) and 'insulin & oral anti diabetic drugs' (females 21.6% vs males 18.4%%; p<0.001) in comparison. Reported average sleeping haours was significantly more among males (6.5±1.1 vs. 6.1±1.2; p<0.001) than females. Males and females reported significantly greater improvements in mean values of blood glucose (-2.07 p<0.001; vs. -2.36; p=0.007), HbA1c (-1.72 p<0.001; vs. -1.47 p=0.038), potassium (+0.98 p<0.001; vs. +0.93 p<0.005); albumin (-3.38 p<0.001; vs. -3.60; p<0.001); billirubin (-0.69 p=0.049; vs. -0.98; p<0.001); uric acid (+11.9 p=0.017; vs. +14.3; p<0.001); systolic blood pressure (-3.86 p<0.001; vs. -3.2 p<0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (-3.17 p<0.001; vs. -3.2 p<0.001) in comparison to 6 months before. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis showed that the satisfaction DTSQ scores for HbA1c (p<0.001), h of sleep (p<0.001), neuropathy (p=0.007), diabetic education (p=0.014), SBP (mmHg) (p=0.021) DBP (mmHg) (p=0.028) were identified as significantly associated with higher treatment satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

The study confirms a positive correlation between diabetes patient's satisfaction with care and treatment. Females DM patients compared to males had a better satisfaction score with current treatment, unacceptably low blood glucose level, flexibility in treatment and understanding of DM.

What determines treatment satisfaction of patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy? An observational study in eight European countries

OBJECTIVE

Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on insulin therapy are less satisfied with their diabetes treatment than those on oral hypoglycaemic therapies or lifestyle advice only. Determinants of satisfaction in patients with T2DM on insulin therapy are not clearly known. The aim of this study was to determine the association of treatment satisfaction with demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with T2DM.

DESIGN

For this study we used data from the GUIDANCE (Guideline Adherence to Enhance Care) study, a cross-sectional study among 7597 patients with T2DM patients from Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK. The majority of patients were recruited from primary care. Treatment satisfaction was assessed by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ, score 0-36; higher scores reflecting higher satisfaction). To determine which patient characteristics and laboratory values were independently associated with treatment satisfaction, a linear mixed model analysis was used.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, 1984 patients on insulin were analysed; the number of included patients per country ranged from 166 (the Netherlands) to 384 (Italy).

RESULTS

The mean DTSQ score was 28.50±7.52 and ranged from 25.93±6.57 (France) to 30.11±5.09 (the Netherlands). Higher DTSQ scores were associated with having received diabetes education (β 1.64, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.32), presence of macrovascular complications (β 0.76, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.31) and better health status (β 0.08 for every one unit increase on a 0-100 scale, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.10). Lower DTSQ scores were associated with more frequently perceived hyperglycaemia (β -0.32 for every 1 unit increase on a seven-point Likert scale, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.13), and higher glycated haemoglobin (β -0.52 for every percentage increase, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

A number of factors including diabetes education, perceived and actual hyperglycaemia and macrovascular complications are associated with treatment satisfaction. Self-management education programmes should incorporate these factors for ongoing support in patients with T2DM.

Validation of an Arabic version of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire in Qatar

AIMS

Several instruments evaluate patient-reported outcomes in diabetes mellitus (DM), but almost none are validated for use in Arabic language. The aim of this study is to test the psychometric properties and responsiveness of the Arabic version of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQs) in Qatar.

METHODS

Ambulatory Arabic speaking DM patients were interviewed at two consecutive time points in Doha, Qatar. The 8-item DTSQs was administered in conjunction with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Measure (WHOQOL-Bref) to assess convergent validity. Reliability was evaluated by internal consistency and item analysis. Construct validity was evaluated using "known groups" comparisons (including gender, insulin use, and HbA1c). Sensitivity of DTSQs scores to the subject's metabolic conditions was determined.

RESULTS

One hundred subjects (mean age 50.7) participated. Half (54%) were female. The majority (93%) had Type 2 DM, but 39 (42%) were using insulin. Results revealed satisfactory internal consistency. Metabolic measures (fasting blood glucose and AIC) had significant inverse correlations with DTSQs scores (interview 1, Pearson's r=-0.333 and r=-0.401, respectively, p<0.01). Scale criterion and construct validity were found to be satisfactory. Most sub-dimensions of the SF-36 and WHOQOL-Bref were correlated with the DTSQ, indicating a good concurrent validity. As in prior studies, women demonstrated poorer treatment satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The Qatar Arabic DTSQs version was found to be a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of treatment satisfaction in Arabic diabetes mellitus patients in the country.