Mini-mental state exam versus Montreal Cognitive Assessment in patients with diabetic retinopathy

The association between the severity of diabetic retinopathy and cognitive impairment: a cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

To assess the correlation among cognitive impairment (CI) and the degree of diabetic retinopathy (DR).

METHODS

The current analytic cross-sectional study has been carried out on two hundred ten individuals having diabetes mellitus type 2. Individuals were split into 7 groups in order of severity of DR in the worse eye with 30 cases in each group. Cognition function has been determined utilizing mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) tests.

RESULTS

Comparing the severity of CI using both MMSE and MoCA tests, statistically substantial differences have been discovered among individuals without DR, those having non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (p < 0.001). The greatest percentage of severe and moderate CI was seen in the PDR group. Regarding the severity of CI, there has been a statistically substantial difference among NPDR and PDR groups, as well as among no-DR and PDR groups (p < 0.001). Moreover, the severity of CI in the MMSE and MoCA tests had a negative connection with the grades of DR (r = - 0.522, P < 0.001 and r = - 0.540, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We discovered a negative connection between the grades of DR and the severity of CI that persisted as a significant finding, showing that patients with more severe DR tended to have higher levels of CI. These results might offer retinal examination or retinal photography as a promising strategy for mass screening of CI in diabetic patients, especially if it is combined with artificial intelligence and telemedicine.

Frequency of coexistent eye diseases and cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We aim to quantify the co-existence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), glaucoma, or diabetic retinopathy (DR) and cognitive impairment or dementia.

METHOD

MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched (to June 2020). Observational studies reporting incidence or prevalence of AMD, glaucoma, or DR in people with cognitive impairment or dementia, and of cognitive impairment or dementia among people with AMD, glaucoma, or DR were included.

RESULTS

Fifty-six studies (57 reports) were included but marked by heterogeneities in the diagnostic criteria or definitions of the diseases, study design, and case mix. Few studies reported on the incidence. Evidence was sparse but consistent in individuals with mild cognitive impairment where 7.7% glaucoma prevalence was observed. Prevalence of AMD and DR among people with cognitive impairment ranged from 3.9% to 9.4% and from 11.4% to 70.1%, respectively. Prevalence of AMD and glaucoma among people with dementia ranged from 1.4 to 53% and from 0.2% to 25.9%, respectively. Prevalence of DR among people with dementia was 11%. Prevalence of cognitive impairment in people with AMD, glaucoma, and DR ranged from 8.4% to 52.4%, 12.3% to 90.2%, and 3.9% to 77.8%, respectively, and prevalence of dementia in people with AMD, glaucoma and DR ranged from 9.9% to 62.6%, 2.5% to 3.3% and was 12.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequency of comorbid eye disease and cognitive impairment or dementia varied considerably. While more population-based estimations of the co-existence are needed, interdisciplinary collaboration might be helpful in the management of these conditions to meet healthcare needs of an ageing population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration: CRD42020189484.

Understanding long-term continence rates after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy - one-year follow-up on "Cognitive ability as a non-modifiable risk factor for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence"

Purpose

To evaluate long-term continence rates (12 months) in patients after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in relation to their cognitive ability (CoAb), which proved to be a predictor for early post-prostatectomy incontinence.

Material & Methods

This is the 12-month follow-up evaluation of our previously published observational single-center, prospective evaluation of 84 patients who underwent RALP as treatment of their localized prostate cancer between 07/2020 and 03/2021. Post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) was measured by asking patients about their 24 h pad usage, whereby 0 pads were considered continent and ≥1 pad was considered incontinent. CoAb was evaluated by performing the Mini-Mental State Examination prior to surgery. Possible predictors for PPI were evaluated using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified early incontinence status and nerve sparing (NS) as independent predictors for PPI after 12 months, resulting in a 5.69 times higher risk for PPI when the loss of urine was between 10 and 50 ml during the early performed pad test (one day after catheter removal) compared to 0-1 ml loss of urine [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33-28.30, p = 0.024] and a 6.77 times higher risk for PPI, respectively, when only unilateral NS was performed compared to bilateral NS (95% CI: 1.79-30.89, p = 0.007). CoAb lost its predictive value for long-term PPI (p = 0.44).

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that PPI is a dynamic, rather than a static condition with a dynamically changing pathophysiology within the first 12 months after RALP. Coping methods and therapies should adapt to this circumstance.

Association Between Diabetic Retinopathy, Brain Structural Abnormalities, and Cognitive Impairment for Accumulated Evidence in Observational Studies

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and cerebral disease or cognitive impairment.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHOD

The hypothesis was formulated prior to data collection. Cross-sectional studies and cohort studies that assessed the association between any measure of DR and cerebral small vessel disease or any type of cognitive impairment in diabetic participants were included. The data were independently extracted by two investigators. This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines RESULTS: A total of 27 studies were included. The combined odds ratio of 5 cross-sectional/cohort studies that reported that the associations between DR and cerebral structural changes was 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-2.25). The combined hazard ratio of 4 cohort studies that examined the association between DR and cognitive impairment events was 1.47 (95% CI: 1.22-1.78). The combined odds ratio of 14 cross-sectional/cohort studies that examined the association between DR and different cognitive impairment events was 1.43 (95% CI: 1.06-1.93). The overall coefficient (β) of 4 studies that examined the relationship between DR and specific cognitive performance was 0.09 (95% CI: 0.00-0.18). Considering the quality of the data, we have performed subgroup analysis in studies scored >7 and studies scored ≤7, respectively, according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis suggests that DR is associated with an increased risk of structural abnormalities in the brain and cognitive impairment. This association remained significant after adjusting for blood glucose, and the presence of hypertension, indicating that DR is an important danger signal for cerebral abnormalities.

Diabetic retinopathy and cognitive dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aims to determine the relationship between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and cognitive dysfunction as well as explores the effects of DR on different cognitive domains.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang data, CBM, CNKI, and VIP databases from their inception to October 2021. The pooled odds ratio (ORs), hazard ratio (HRs), and 95% confidence interval (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria and meta-analysis included 15 studies. The presence of DR reflects a higher risk of cognitive dysfunction (OR = 2.45; 95% CI: 1.76-3.41; HR = 1.34 95% CI: 1.10-1.62). Cohort study combined risk was 2.62 (95% CI: 1.93-3.56), in cross-sectional study was 2.07 (95% CI: 1.11-3.88). The pooled OR was 2.38 (95% CI: 1.83-3.10) and 3.11 (95% CI: 1.15-8.40) in Asia and Oceania. No such association was found in North America (OR = 2.22; 95% CI: 0.77-6.38). The pooled risk was 2.47 (95% CI: 1.76-3.48) in patients with T2DM, while did not identify an association between these two conditions in T1DM. The combined unadjusted and adjusted ORs were 2.72 (95% CI: 1.99-3.73) and 2.06 (95% CI: 1.49-2.85). DR severity and the risk of cognitive impairment showed a positive correlation and mainly impaired the speeds of psychomotor and information processing.

CONCLUSIONS

DR can help to identify people at high risk of cognitive dysfunction. Further studies are indispensable for exploring the relationship between DR and cognitive impairment in the patients for different age, gender and race, as well as to assess the risk of cognitive impairment in different populations.

Cognitive Ability as a Non-modifiable Risk Factor for Post-prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence: A Double-Blinded, Prospective, Single-Center Trial

Introduction: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a wide-spread and feared side-effect of conventional or even robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) due to its high impact on patients' quality of life (QoL). Non-modifiable risk factors for UI have already been identified - on surgical and patient side. Yet, to our knowledge, focus thus far has not been placed on functional aspects regarding general cognitive ability. Materials and Methods: This is an observational single-center, prospective, double-blinded evaluation of 109 RALPs performed between 07/2020 and 03/2021. All patients underwent a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) prior to surgery to evaluate their cognitive ability. Early post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) was evaluated using a standardized 1 h pad test performed 24 h after removal of the urinary catheter. The association between MMSE results and PPI were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified MMSE results and nerve sparing (NS) as independent predictors for PPI in patients with an intermediate MMSE result (25-27 points) having a 3.17 times higher risk of PPI when compared to patients with a good MMSE result (≥28) (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.22-9.06, p = 0.023), while patients without NS had a 3.53 times higher risk of PPI when compared to patients with NS (95% CI: 1.54-11.09, p = 0.006). Conclusion: A lower cognitive ability should be treated as a non-modifiable risk-factor for early PPI. In the future it could find its place as a clinical screening tool to identify patients who require more attention especially in the pre-, but also in the postoperative phase.

Association Between Diabetic Retinopathy and Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the most common microvascular complications associated with diabetes mellitus. However, its correlation with another diabetes-related disorder, cognitive impairment, has not been well studied. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the association between DR and cognitive impairment. MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases were searched for observational studies that reported an association between DR and cognitive impairment. Data from selected studies were extracted, and a meta-analysis was conducted using fixed-effects modeling. Fifteen observational studies were included in the systematic review, and 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The odds ratio of the association between DR and cognitive impairment was 2.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.89-2.66; I ² = 0.8%). The hazard ratio of the association between DR and cognitive impairment was significant in four studies, ranging from 1.09-1.32. Minimal or mild DR was not significantly associated with cognitive impairment (odds ratio [OR], 2.04; 95% CI, 0.87-4.77). However, the association between proliferative DR and cognitive impairment (OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.79-7.12; I ² = 16.6%) was not stronger than the association between moderate or worse DR and cognitive impairment (OR, 4.26; 95% CI, 2.01-9.07; I ² = 0.0%). DR is associated with cognitive impairment, and screening for DR will be helpful for the early identification of individuals with cognitive impairment. Further studies are needed to confirm the association between proliferative DR and cognitive impairment.

Effect of mirabegron on cognitive function in elderly patients with overactive bladder: MoCA results from a phase 4 randomized, placebo-controlled study (PILLAR)

Background

Antimuscarinics are often used for treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), but exposure to medications such as antimuscarinics that have anticholinergic properties has been linked to adverse cognitive effects. A phase 4 placebo-controlled study (PILLAR; NCT02216214) described the efficacy and safety of mirabegron, a β₃-adrenoreceptor agonist, for treatment of wet OAB in patients aged ≥65 years. This pre-planned analysis aimed to measure differences in cognitive function between mirabegron and placebo, using a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive impairment: the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

Methods

Outpatients aged ≥65 years with wet OAB were randomized 1:1 to mirabegron or placebo, stratified by age (<75/≥75 years). There were no exclusion criteria regarding cognitive status. Patients randomized to mirabegron initially received 25 mg/day with an optional increase to 50 mg/day after week 4/8 based on patient/investigator discretion. The MoCA was administered at baseline and end of treatment (EoT, week 12). The study protocol was Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board-approved.

Results

Of the 887 randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug, 72.3% were female, 79.5% were white, and 28.1% were aged ≥75 years. All patients had ≥1 comorbidity and 94.3% were receiving ≥1 concomitant medication. One third of patients had a history of psychiatric disorders, the most common being depression (17.2%), insomnia (15.7%), and anxiety (11.4%). Baseline mean (standard error, SE) MoCA total scores were 26.9 (0.1) and 26.8 (0.1) in the mirabegron and placebo groups, respectively. Among patients with MoCA data available at baseline/EoT, 27.1% (115/425) and 25.8% (106/411) of mirabegron and placebo group patients, respectively, had impaired cognitive function at baseline (MoCA total score <26). There was no statistically significant change in adjusted mean (SE) MoCA total score from baseline to EoT in the mirabegron group (−0.2 [0.1]) or the placebo group (−0.1 [0.1]).

Conclusions

Treatment with mirabegron for 12 weeks did not contribute to drug-related cognitive side effects in patients aged ≥65 years, as measured by the MoCA. Furthermore, the pattern of change in cognition over time in an older OAB trial population does not appear to differ from that of subjects receiving placebo.

Trial registration

NCT02216214 (prospectively registered August 13, 2014).

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Normative Data from a Large Swedish Population-Based Cohort

BACKGROUND

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has a high sensitivity for detecting cognitive dysfunction. Swedish normative data does not exist and international norms are often derived from populations where cognitive impairment has not been screened for and not been thoroughly assessed to exclude subjects with dementia or mild cognitive impairment.

OBJECTIVE

To establish norms for MoCA and develop a regression-based norm calculator based on a large, well-examined cohort.

METHODS

MoCA was administered on 860 randomly selected elderly people from a population-based cohort from the EPIC study. Cognitive dysfunction was screened for and further assessed at a memory clinic. After excluding cognitively impaired participants, normative data was derived from 758 people, aged 65-85.

RESULTS

MoCA cut-offs (-1 to -2 standard deviations) for cognitive impairment ranged from <25 to <21 for the lowest educated and <26 to <24 for the highest educated, depending on age group. Significant predictors for MoCA score were age, sex and level of education.

CONCLUSION

We present detailed normative MoCA data and cut-offs according to the DSM-5 criteria for cognitive impairment based on a large population-based cohort of elderly individuals, screened and thoroughly investigated to rule out cognitive impairment. Level of education, sex, and age should be taken in account when evaluating MoCA score, which is facilitated by our online regression-based calculator that provide percentile and z-score for a subject's MoCA score.