Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of metastatic renal cell carcinoma to the pancreas: A multi-center experience

The yield of cytology and histology obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy needles in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy (EUS-FNA, -FNB) are the mainstay for tissue diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. Traditionally, FNA was performed for obtaining cytology and also histology if available from the puncture. Since their advent, however, FNB needles have been intended mainly to obtain core biopsies for histological specimens.

AIMS

We aimed to assess the yield of cytology obtained via both FNA and FNB needles.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed including all patients who were diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma obtained via EUS-FNA/FNB needles.

RESULTS

Overall, 227 patients were included. Of them, 85 patients underwent FNB, versus 142 patients who had FNA. The average age in the FNB group was 70.46 ± 11.29 years, versus 71.44 ± 11.80 in the FNA group, P = 0.57. Notably, cytological analysis diagnosed malignancy equally in both groups (69.4% in the FNB group, vs. 65.5% in the FNA group). The compatibility rate of cytology with histology was 76.5% in the FNB group, versus 76.1% in the FNA group (P = 0.69). The agreement level between cytology obtained by FNA and FNB, versus histology obtained by both needles, was moderate (kappa = 0.48, 95% CI 0.39-0.57). Similarly, the agreement level between cytology and histology in the FNB group was moderate as well (kappa = 0.5, 95% CI 0.36-0.64).

CONCLUSION

Cytological assessment yielded an equal performance as compared to histological assessment with both needles. We recommend obtaining cytology specimens in pancreatic solid lesion puncture by FNB needle.

Simultaneous presentation and resection of esophageal cancer and metastasis to the pancreas: Α case report and literature review

The frequency of metastasis to the pancreas is limited, and the frequency of metastasis of a squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus is limited even further. The curative resection of this type of metastatic lesion has been reported for some patients; however, the survival benefit that can be attributed to these procedures has not yet been clearly determined. The patient examined in the present study was a 54-year-old man who was diagnosed with a lower thoracic esophageal cancer. Computed tomography revealed a 2-cm tumor at the tail of the pancreas. Since no other obvious distal metastases were observed, the patient underwent simultaneous surgical procedures, excising the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and the pancreatic metastasis. A histopathological examination confirmed squamous cell carcinoma in both specimens. The patient has been free of disease for 9 months since the resection. A literature review of all relevant cases to date also demonstrated that the primary tumor site in all cases of patients with esophageal cancer presenting with metastasis to the pancreas was the lower thoracic esophagus. Complete simultaneous resections of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and a solitary metastasis to the pancreas is beneficial and may produce favorable outcomes. However, due to the reduced number of corresponding reports, further studies are required for the confirmation of the benefits of surgery.

Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma to Pancreas: Case Series and Review of the Literature

Metastasis to the pancreas represents a small proportion of all pancreatic malignancies. Among primary tumors that metastasize to the pancreas, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common causes of metastatic pancreatic lesions. We herein report a case series of three patients with pancreatic metastasis from RCC. The first is a 54-year-old male with a history of left nephrectomy for RCC, in whom an isthmic pancreatic mass suggestive of a neuroendocrine lesion was found during oncological follow-up. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy (FNB) identified pancreatic metastasis of RCC and the patient was referred for surgery. The second case is a 61-year-old male, hypertensive, diabetic, with left nephrectomy for RCC six years previously, who complained of weight loss and was found with a hyperenhancing mass in the head of the pancreas and a lesion with a similar pattern in the gallbladder. EUS-FNB from the pancreas proved to be a metastatic pancreatic lesion. Cholecystectomy and treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors were recommended. The third case is a 68-year-old dialysis patient referred for evaluation of a pancreatic mass, also confirmed by EUS-FNB, who was started on sunitinib treatment. We report a literature summary on epidemiology and clinical features, diagnosis and differential diagnosis and treatment and outcomes in pancreatic metastasis of RCC.

Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma to Pancreas: Case Series and Review of the Literature

Metastasis to the pancreas represents a small proportion of all pancreatic malignancies. Among primary tumors that metastasize to the pancreas, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common causes of metastatic pancreatic lesions. We herein report a case series of three patients with pancreatic metastasis from RCC. The first is a 54-year-old male with a history of left nephrectomy for RCC, in whom an isthmic pancreatic mass suggestive of a neuroendocrine lesion was found during oncological follow-up. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy (FNB) identified pancreatic metastasis of RCC and the patient was referred for surgery. The second case is a 61-year-old male, hypertensive, diabetic, with left nephrectomy for RCC six years previously, who complained of weight loss and was found with a hyperenhancing mass in the head of the pancreas and a lesion with a similar pattern in the gallbladder. EUS-FNB from the pancreas proved to be a metastatic pancreatic lesion. Cholecystectomy and treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors were recommended. The third case is a 68-year-old dialysis patient referred for evaluation of a pancreatic mass, also confirmed by EUS-FNB, who was started on sunitinib treatment. We report a literature summary on epidemiology and clinical features, diagnosis and differential diagnosis and treatment and outcomes in pancreatic metastasis of RCC.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in diagnosing intra-abdominal lesions

Objectives:

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (EUS-FNAC) is an effective method to acquire tissue from the mucosal, submucosal, and peri-intestinal structure with the pancreas being the most common organ to be targeted. This study is aimed to evaluate the role of EUS-FNAC in pancreatic lesions as well as other gastrointestinal (GI) structures including lymph nodes, upper GI tract, liver, and spleen.

Material and Methods:

A total of 71 cases were taken in which EUS FNAC was performed over 19 months (2018–July 2019). The details analysis of the cytological features was performed in all these cases along with the clinical outcome. The diagnostic efficacy of the EUS-FNAC was evaluated in these cases.

Results:

Out of 71 cases, 36 (50.7%) were male. The most common site being the pancreas 45 (60%) followed by intra-abdominal lymph nodes in 13(17.3%) cases and stomach 7 (9.3%). The neoplastic aspirate was noted in 38 (50.7%) cases. Among malignant lesion, adenocarcinoma was the most common; however, uncommon malignancies such as metastatic malignant melanoma and acinar cell carcinoma were also noted. Malignant lesion in pancreas includes adenocarcinoma (n = 11, 24.4%) followed by neuroendocrine tumor (n = 7, 15.6%). Tuberculosis was one of the common benign lesions to be reported.

Conclusion:

EUS-FNAC is an effective tool in the diagnosis of GI lesion particularly in the pancreas where it can avoid unnecessary surgical intervention in advanced malignancies. It can effectively obtain samples for molecular markers for pancreatic cancers. Nonetheless, diagnosing tuberculosis in inaccessible lymph nodes with its help is a lifesaving approach especially in developing countries.

Repeat pancreatic resection for metachronous pancreatic metastasis from renal cell carcinoma: A case report

Background

Pancreatic metastasis (PM) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is relatively rare. Surgical resection of PM from RCC is considered as the first choice treatment for achieving long-term prognosis. Herein, we report a case of secondary multiple metastases from RCC to the remnant pancreas following pancreatectomy, with a review of the relevant literature.

Presentation of case

A 69-year-old man who underwent left nephrectomy for RCC (T2N0M0, stage II) 12 years ago was referred to our hospital. Multiple metastases to the pancreatic head from RCC occurred 2 years after the primary surgery, for which pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. Nine years after metastatic resection, multiple tumors of the remnant pancreas were detected on dynamic computed tomography (CT); all tumors showed strong enhancement in the early phase, which persisted into the late phase. The tumors were round, the maximum diameter of the tumor was 20 mm, and they were hyperintense on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Positron emission tomography-CT revealed slight fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the tumor. Multiple PMs were diagnosed, and the remnant pancreas was completely resected. Two years later, the patient was alive and showed no recurrence.

Conclusions

Surgical resection could provide long-term prognosis, even if secondary PM from RCC occurs metachronously. Long-term follow-up is recommended after primary resection, and vigilance regarding the occurrence of PM is needed.

•

Surgical resection for pancreatic metastasis from renal cell carcinoma is considered as the first choice treatment.

•

We report a case of secondary multiple metastases from renal cell carcinoma to the remnant pancreas following pancreatectomy.

•

Surgical resection could provide long-term prognosis even if secondary pancreatic metastasis is occurred metachronously.

Malignant biliary obstruction due to metastatic non-hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer

Malignant biliary obstruction generally results from primary malignancies of the pancreatic head, bile duct, gallbladder, liver, and ampulla of Vater. Metastatic lesions from other primaries to these organs or nearby lymph nodes are rarer causes of biliary obstruction. The most common primaries include renal cancer, lung cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, lymphoma, and melanoma. They may be difficult to differentiate from primary hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer based on imaging studies, or even on biopsy. There is also no consensus on the optimal method of treatment, including the feasibility and effectiveness of endoscopic intervention or surgery. A thorough review of the literature on pancreato-biliary metastases and malignant biliary obstruction due to metastatic non-hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer is presented. The diagnostic modality and clinical characteristics may differ significantly depending on the type of primary cancer. Different primaries also cause malignant biliary obstruction in different ways, including direct invasion, pancreatic or biliary metastasis, hilar lymph node metastasis, liver metastasis, and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Metastasectomy may hold promise for some types of pancreato-biliary metastases. This review aims to elucidate the current knowledge in this area, which has received sparse attention in the past. The aging population, advances in diagnostic imaging, and improved treatment options may lead to an increase in these rare occurrences going forward.

Diagnostic Performance of Pancreatic Cytology with the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System: A Systematic Review, before Shifting into the Upcoming WHO International System

The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) reporting system classifies pancreatobiliary samples into six categories (I–VI), providing guidance for personalized management. As the World Health Organization (WHO) has been preparing an updated reporting system for pancreatobiliary cytopathology, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the risk of malignancy (ROM) of each PSC category, also the sensitivity and specificity of pancreatic FNA cytology using the current PSC system. Five databases were investigated with a predefined search algorithm. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select the eligible studies for subsequent data extraction. A study quality assessment was also performed. Eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis. The ROM of the PSC categories I, II, III, IV, V, VI were in the ranges of 8–50%, 0–40%, 28–100%, 0–31%, 82–100%, and 97–100%, respectively. Notably, the ROM IVB (“neoplastic—benign”) subcategory showed a 0% ROM. Four of the included studies reported separately the ROMs for the IVO subcategory (“neoplastic—other”; its overall ROM ranged from 0 to 34%) with low (LGA) and high-grade atypia (HGA). ROM for LGA ranged from 4.3 to 19%, whereas ROM for HGA from 64 to 95.2%. When the subcategory IVO with HGA was considered as cytologically positive, together with the categories V and VI, there was a higher sensitivity of pancreatic cytology, at minimal expense of the specificity. Evidence suggests the proposed WHO international system changes—shifting the IVB entities into the “benign/negative for malignancy” category and establishing two new categories, the “pancreatic neoplasm, low-risk/grade” and “pancreatic neoplasm, high-risk/grade”—could stratify pancreatic neoplasms more effectively than the current PSC system.

Differentiation between pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm using endoscopic ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) often appear many years after treatment of the primary tumor, and differentiation from pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN) can be challenging due to their hypervascularity. Here, we investigated the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for differentiation of these conditions.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed in 17 and 79 consecutive patients with pathologically proven PRCC and non-functional PanNEN who were examined by EUS. In cases examined by EUS elastography or contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS), the lesions were classified as stiff or soft, or into three vascular patterns as hypoechoic, isoechoic, and hyperechoic. CH-EUS images at 20 s, 40 s, 60 s, 3 min and 5 min were used for evaluation. EUS images were independently reviewed by two readers who were blinded to all clinical information.

RESULTS

The patients with PRCC were significantly older than those with PanNEN (median, 71 (range, 45-81) vs. 58 (22-76), P = 0.001) and more often had multiple tumors (6/17 (35%) vs. 7/79 (9%), P = 0.010). In EUS findings, PRCC lesions significantly more frequently had a marginal hypoechoic zone (MHZ) (11/17 (65%) vs. 27/79 (34%), P = 0.028), being classified as soft (12/13 (92%) vs. 26/58 (45%), P = 0.002), and showed sustained hyperechoic vascular patterns at 5 min (7/8 (88%) vs. 4/59 (7%), P < 0.001) compared to PanNEN lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a MHZ, a soft lesion, and a sustained hyperechoic vascular pattern in EUS may be useful for differentiating PRCC from PanNEN.

Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration vs fine needle biopsy for pancreatic masses, subepithelial lesions, and lymph nodes

Endoscopic ultrasound tissue acquisition, in the form of both fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB), is utilized for pancreatic mass lesions, subepithelial lesions, and lymph node biopsy. Both procedures are safe and yield high diagnostic value. Despite its high diagnostic yield, EUS-FNA has potential limitations associated with cytological aspirations, including inability to determine histologic architecture, and a small quantitative sample for further immunohistochemical staining. EUS-FNB, with its larger core biopsy needle, was designed to overcome these potential limitations. However, it remains unclear which technique should be used and for which lesions. Comparative trials are plagued by heterogeneity at every stage of comparison; including variable needles used, and different definitions of endpoints, which therefore limit generalizability. Thus, we present a review of prospective trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses on studies examining EUS-FNA vs EUS-FNB. Prospective comparative trials of EUS-FNA vs EUS-FNB primarily focus on pancreatic mass lesions, and yield conflicting results in terms of demonstrating the superiority of one method. However, consistent among trials is the potential for diagnosis with fewer passes, and a larger quantity of sample achieved for next generation sequencing. With regard to subepithelial lesions and lymph node biopsy, fewer prospective trials exist, and larger prospective studies are necessary. Based on the available literature, we would recommend EUS-FNB for peri-hepatic lymph nodes.

Atypical Locations of Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastases to the Pancreas and Duodenum

Introduction

Pancreatic tumors account for a small percentage of all malignancies. Most of them are primary and originate from cells of the exocrine pancreas. The remaining primary changes are neuroendocrine tumors. The pancreas may also be a target of metastatic lesions. The most common cancer that metastasizes to the pancreas is renal cell carcinoma.

Case Studies

The paper presents two cases of rare metastases to organs of the abdominal cavity: the first patient treated surgically due to two metastatic lesions of renal cell carcinoma in the pancreas, diagnosed many years after radical nephrectomy. The second case of high gastrointestinal obstruction in the course of metastasis of renal cell carcinoma to the duodenum. The first patient underwent distal laparotomic resection of the pancreas. The second patient underwent resection of the duodenum and the first jejunal loop with side-to-side duodeno-jejunal anastomosis. Both patients remain under oncological supervision.

Conclusion

Patients after radical nephrectomy due to renal cell carcinoma require long-term systematic monitoring. Due to the anatomical position of the pancreas and duodenum as well as the number, location and size of metastatic lesions, the course of the disease may be initially asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic. Aggressive surgical treatment of pancreatic metastases creates opportunities for long-term survival.

Comparison of EUS-guided conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and study aims  Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has limitations of inadequate sampling and false-negative results for malignancy. It has been performed using conventional smear (CS) cytology with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) with reasonable diagnostic accuracy. An alternative to ROSE is liquid-based cytology (LBC). Commonly used LBC techniques include precipitation-based (SurePath™) and filtration-based (ThinPrep ^® , CellPrep ^® ). Data regarding the diagnostic efficacy of LBC compared with CS are limited. Methods  Multiple databases were searched through March 2020 to identify studies reporting diagnostic yield of EUS-guided CS and LBC in pancreatic lesions. Pooled diagnostic odds and rates of performance for the cytologic diagnoses of benign, suspicious, and malignant lesions were calculated. Diagnostic efficacy was evaluated by pooled rates of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Results  Nine studies with a total of 1308 patients were included in our final analysis. Pooled diagnostic odds of CS cytology were 1.69 (CI 1.02-2.79) and 0.39 (CI 0.19-0.8) for malignant lesions when compared to filtration-based and precipitation-based LBC techniques, respectively. For CS, precipitation-based and filtration-based LBC, pooled diagnostic accuracy was 79.7 %, 85.2 %, 77.3 %, sensitivity was 79.2 %, 83.6 %, 68.3 %, and specificity was 99.4 %, 99.5 %, 99.5 %, respectively. Conclusions  The precipitation-based LBC technique (SurePath™) had superior diagnostic odds for malignant pancreatic lesions compared with CS cytology in the absence of ROSE. It showed superior accuracy and sensitivity, but comparable specificity and PPV. Diagnostic odds of CS cytology in the absence of ROSE were superior to the filtration-based LBC technique (ThinPrep ^® , Cellprep ^® ) for diagnosing malignant pancreatic lesions.

Evaluation of metastases to the pancreas with fine needle aspiration: A case series from a single centre with review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a minimally invasive albeit highly effective modality used to detect solid and cystic pancreatic lesions. This manuscript aims to present our experience in diagnosing metastases to the pancreas and highlight the importance of immunocytochemistry in the diagnostic process. It also aims to provide a brief review of the literature on this topic.

METHODS

We retrospectively searched our archives for cases of metastatic deposits to the pancreas diagnosed with FNA over a 5-year period. We also reviewed the literature for such cases.

RESULTS

We describe seven cases from our archives that metastasised to the pancreas. Three of them (43%) represented metastatic renal cell carcinoma while the rest four comprised deposits from a lung adenocarcinoma, a colon adenocarcinoma, an adrenal leiomyosarcoma, and a small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder, respectively. History of primary malignancy was available for all seven patients. All diagnoses were confirmed with the use of immunostains. In our literature review, similar to our case series, renal cell carcinoma was the most common metastasis to the pancreas managed with FNA (around one out of three patients; 35%). Of interest, our endoscopic ultrasound-FNA case of pancreatic metastasis from urinary bladder small cell carcinoma is the first reported.

CONCLUSIONS

As metastases to the pancreas are commonly accompanied by diverse prognostic signatures and management strategies compared to primary pancreatic malignancies, their accurate identification is imperative. Pancreatic FNA is a diagnostic modality that can confirm or exclude metastasis to the organ, especially when immunocytochemistry is applied.

Ancillary Techniques in Cytologic Specimens Obtained from Solid Lesions of the Pancreas: A Review

Advanced methods of molecular characterization have elucidated the genetic, epigenetic, and proteomic alterations associated with the broad spectrum of pancreatic disease, particularly neoplasia. Next-generation sequencing, in particular, has revealed the genomic diversity among pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine and acinar tumors, solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, and other pancreatico-biliary neoplasms. Differentiating these entities from one another by morphologic analysis alone may be challenging, especially when examining the small quantities of diagnostic material inherent to cytologic specimens. In order to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of pancreatic cytomorphology, multiple diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive ancillary tests have been and continue to be developed. Although a great number of such tests have been developed for evaluation of specimens collected from cystic lesions and strictures, ancillary techniques also play a significant role in the evaluation of cytologic specimens obtained from solid lesions of the pancreas. Furthermore, while some tests have been developed to differentiate diagnostic entities from one another, others have been developed to simply identify dysplasia and malignancy. Ancillary studies are particularly important in the subset of cases for which cytomorphologic analysis provides a result that is equivocal or insufficient to guide clinical management. Selection of appropriate ancillary testing modalities requires familiarity with both their methodology and the molecular basis of the pancreatic diseases for which testing is being performed.

Differentiation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreas renal cell carcinoma metastases on CT using qualitative and quantitative features

PURPOSE

To assess qualitative and quantitative imaging features on enhanced CT that may differentiate pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) from pancreatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) metastases.

METHODS

This IRB-approved multi-center retrospective case-control study compared 43 resected PNETs and 28 resected RCC metastases with pre-operative enhanced CT identified consecutively between 2003 and 2017. Two blinded radiologists (R1/R2) independently assessed tumor location, attenuation (relative to pancreas), composition (solid/cystic/mixed), homogeneity (homogeneous/heterogeneous), calcification, multiplicity, and for main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilation. Tumors were segmented for quantitative texture analysis. Data were analyzed with Chi square, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Inter-observer agreement was assessed (Cohen's kappa).

RESULTS

There was no difference in age, gender, location, attenuation, or composition (P > 0.05) between groups. PNETs were larger than RCC metastases (37 ± 23 mm vs. 26 ± 21 mm, P = 0.038), more frequently solitary (P < 0.001), subjectively more heterogeneous (P = 0.033/0.144, R1/R2), and associated with calcification (P = 0.002/0.004) and MPD dilation (P = 0.025/0.006). Agreement for subjective features was moderate-to-almost perfect (K = 0.4879-0.9481). Quantitative texture analysis showed higher entropy in PNETs (6.32 ± 0.49 versus 5.96 ± 0.53; P = 0.004) with no difference in other features studied (P > 0.05). Entropy had ROC area under the curve for diagnosis of PNET of 0.77 ± 0.06, with optimal sensitivity/specificity of 71.4/79.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to pancreatic RCC metastases, PNETs are larger, more frequently solitary, contain calcification, show MPD dilation, and are subjectively and quantitatively more heterogeneous tumors.

Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma to the pancreas: Report of an extremely rare case

Secondary pancreatic lesions are very uncommon. Resection of these metastatic lesions with a curative intent has been reported in selected patients; however, the survival benefit from these procedures has yet to be clearly determined. A 78-year-old male patient presented to our department with obstructive jaundice. Three years prior to presentation the patient had undergone right pneumonectomy, due to stage IIA, low-grade squamous cell lung carcinoma. After resection, the patient received adjuvant chemotherapy, with no evidence of local or systemic recurrence over the following 3 years. Abdominal computer tomography on admission revealed a 3-cm lesion located at the head of the pancreas, causing biliary obstruction. Endoscopic ultrasound biopsy revealed malignant cells, suspicious for squamous cell carcinoma. Due to the limited extent of the metastatic disease and in view of the patient's good condition, surgical resection was proposed and the patient successfully underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Histological examination of the resected specimen confirmed a squamous cell carcinoma, with an immunochemical profile similar to that of the primary lung tumor. Therefore, pancreatic resection with curative intent may be feasible in selected patients with secondary metastatic tumors. However, further studies are required in order to determine the benefit of these major procedures in terms of survival outcomes.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of secondary tumors involving pancreas: an institution's experience

INTRODUCTION

Metastases that present as pancreatic masses are rare. Understanding and recognizing this uncommon occurrence during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) will help in making an accurate diagnosis and planning for clinical management. In this study, we reviewed our experience in diagnosing pancreatic secondary tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A pathology archive database search was performed for EUS-FNAs of the pancreas with a diagnosis of metastatic tumor at our institution. The corresponding clinical presentations, imaging studies, cytological diagnoses, ancillary studies, and surgical follow-up were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 30 cases were identified with 18 male and 12 female patients. Twenty-eight patients (93.3%) had a prior history of malignancy, with a latency ranging from 0 to 36 years. The secondary tumors included carcinoma (18 of 30), neuroendocrine tumor (5 of 30), melanoma (4 of 30), and sarcoma (3 of 30). The most common metastatic tumor was clear cell renal cell carcinoma (37%, 11 of 30). Correct diagnoses were rendered in 28 cases (93.3%). The remaining 2 cases failed to be accurately diagnosed: one pleomorphic carcinoma (reported as pleomorphic sarcoma) and one liposarcoma (reported as poorly differentiated malignant neoplasm). Both cases did not have immunohistochemistry performed because of a lack of diagnostic materials in cell blocks.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrated that metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma was the most common secondary tumor involving the pancreas. Secondary tumors involving the pancreas can be accurately diagnosed by EUS-FNA. Knowing the prior history of malignancy, recognizing uncommon cytomorphologic features, and performing ancillary studies are keys to improve diagnostic accuracy.

EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study

OBJECTIVES

Different diagnostic entities can present as solid pancreatic lesions (SPL). This study aimed to explore the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling (EUS-FNB) in SPLs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 2012-2015, consecutive patients with SPLs were prospectively included in a tertiary center setting and subjected to dual needle sampling with a 22 gauge reverse bevel biopsy needle and a conventional 25 gauge open tip aspiration needle (EUS-FNA). The outcome measures were the diagnostic accuracy of sampling, calculated for each modality separately and for the modalities combined (EUS-FNA + FNB), and the adverse event rate related to sampling.

RESULTS

In 68 unique study subjects, the most common diagnostic entities were pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, PNET, (34%), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, PDAC, (32%), pancreatitis (15%) and metastasis (6%). The overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB was not significantly different from that of EUS-FNA, (69% vs. 78%, p = .31). EUS-FNA + FNB, compared with EUS-FNA alone, had a higher sensitivity for tumors other than PDAC (89% vs. 69%, p = .02) but not for PDACs (95% vs. 85%, p = .5). No adverse event was recorded after the study dual-needle sampling procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition performed with a 22 gauge reverse bevel biopsy needle is safe but not superior to conventional fine-needle aspiration performed with a 25 gauge open tip needle in diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions. However, the performance of both these modalities may facilitate the diagnostic work-up in selected patients, such as cases suspicious for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and metastases. NCT02360839.

Present status and perspectives of endosonography 2017 in gastroenterology

Endoscopic ultrasound has become an essential tool in modern gastroenterology and abdominal surgery. Compared with all other endoscopic methods, it has the most potential for innovation and its future looks bright. Thus, we compiled this summary of established and novel applications of endoscopic ultrasound methods to inform the reader about what is already possible and where future developments will lead in improving patient care further. This review is structured in four parts. The first section reports on developments in diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound, the second looks at semi-invasive endoscopic ultrasound, and the third discusses advances in therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound. An overview on the future prospects of endoscopic ultrasound methods concludes this article.

Asymptomatic Pancreatic Metastasis from Renal Cell Carcinoma Diagnosed 21 Years after Nephrectomy

This report presents our experience with a case of pancreatic metastasis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at a long-term follow-up after nephrectomy. A 73-year-old man underwent nephrectomy for right RCC 21 years ago; computed tomography (CT) scanning on routine follow-up revealed a solid mass in the tail of the pancreas, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed some tumors in the head and tail of the pancreas. The patient was asymptomatic and allergic to contrast medium. Therefore we could not perform contrast CT/MRI for further examination to diagnose pancreatic tumors. We undertook endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and detected a hypervascular and low echoic mass; tumor tissues were obtained by EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Pathological diagnosis revealed pancreatic metastasis of clear cell RCC; this was similar to the pathological findings of tumor tissues initially obtained by nephrectomy. EUS-FNA was extremely useful for the definitive diagnosis of a rare type of pancreatic tumor.

Metastatic neoplasms to the pancreas diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration/biopsy cytology: A 15-year retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Metastatic tumors to the pancreas are rarely encountered and diagnostically challenging. We aspired to determine the incidence and origin of all metastases to the pancreas at our institution, and to examine their clinicopathologic and cytomorphologic features. We also sought to ascertain the effect of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance implementation.

METHODS

A search of our database was undertaken to review all pancreatic FNA and/or CNB examined from January 2000 through December 2014.

RESULTS

During our 15-year study, 636 patients underwent pancreatic FNA/CNB, including 252 (40%) computerized tomography (CT) and 384 (60%) EUS-guided biopsies. Malignancy was diagnosed in 221 (35%). Only 16 had metastases to the pancreas, comprising 2.5% of pancreatic biopsies and 7.2% of malignancies. Three (18.8%) presented with their first manifestation of cancer. EUS guidance was utilized in 50%, with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) employed in 14 (88%). The most common primary site was lung (6,38%), followed by 3 (19%) each of renal and gastrointestinal malignancies. The remaining included malignant melanoma, Merkel and gallbladder small cell carcinomas, and olfactory neuroblastoma.

CONCLUSION

Cytologic diagnosis of metastasis to the pancreas is rare in our institution, comprising only 2.5% and 7.2% of total and malignant pancreatic FNA/CNB, respectively. FNA/CNB with ROSE proved to be an effective diagnostic modality, thereby obviating the need for more invasive procedures in the setting of pancreatic metastases. EUS-FNA was equally effective as CT-guided biopsies in achieving specimen adequacy and definitive diagnoses. We also present the first known case of a metastatic olfactory neuroblastoma to the pancreas diagnosed by imprint cytology.

An Unusual Case of Pancreatic Metastasis from Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung Diagnosed by EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy

We report a case of a 70-year-old man who presented with abdominal pain and weight loss, with initial imaging showing simultaneous mass lesions in the pancreas and lungs along with extensive lymphadenopathy in the thorax up to the left supraclavicular region. Core biopsies of the left supraclavicular lymph node showed squamous cell carcinoma, which required differentiation between secondary and primary pancreatic neoplasms. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling using a novel fine needle biopsy system was key to making a definite histological diagnosis and determining the best treatment plan.

Pancreatic involvement by metastasizing neoplasms as determined by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: A clinicopathologic characterization

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic tumors often represent primary neoplasms, however organ involvement with metastatic disease can occur. The use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) to determine the underlying pathology provides guidance of clinical management.

METHODS

25 cases were identified in a retrospective review of our institution's records from 2006 to 2016. Clinical parameters and prognosis are described.

RESULTS

Metastatic lesions to the pancreas diagnosed by EUS-FNA accounted for 4.2% of all pancreatic neoplastic diagnoses, each lesion had a median greatest dimension of 1.5 cm, were most often located in the head of the pancreas, and by EUS were typically hypoechoic masses with variably defined borders. Patients were of a median age of 64 years old at diagnosis of the metastatic lesion(s) and the mean interval from primary diagnosis to the diagnosis of metastasis to the pancreas was 58.7 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 35.4 to 82.0 months). The rates of 24-month overall survival after diagnoses of metastatic renal cell carcinoma or all other neoplasms to the pancreas were 90% and 7% respectively. The origin of the neoplasms included the kidney (n = 10), colon (n = 4), ovary (n = 3), lung (n = 2), et al. Smear-based cytomorphology, and a combination of histomorphology and immunohistochemical studies from cell block preparations showed features consistent with the neoplasm of derivation.

CONCLUSION

Metastases to the pancreas can be diagnosed via EUS-FNA, with enough specimen to conduct immunohistochemical studies if necessary to delineate origin. The determination of metastatic disease to the pancreas alters management and prognosis of the patient. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2017;45:418-425. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.