1
|
Lameire DL, Soeder J, Abdel Khalik H, Pinsker E, Atri N, Khoshbin A, Radomski L, Atrey A. Local vancomycin administration in Orthopaedic Surgery - A systematic review of comparative studies. J Orthop 2024; 55:44-58. [PMID: 38655540 PMCID: PMC11035019 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.03.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background There is still controversy surrounding the routine use of vancomycin locally in primary orthopaedic surgery procedures. Therefore, the aim of this review is to assess how local vancomycin impacts the rates and microbiology of surgical site infections. Methods A systematic electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science was carried out for all comparative studies comparing locally applied vancomycin to control for primary orthopaedic surgery procedures published before August 14, 2022. Results A total of 61 studies with 65,671 patients were included for analysis. Forty-six studies used vancomycin powder, 12 studies with grafts soaked in vancomycin, two studies used vancomycin irrigation, and one study administered vancomycin interosseously. There were 15 studies (of 26) in spine surgery, five (of 14) in arthroplasty, ten (of 11) in sports medicine, and two (of five) in trauma surgery that found statistically significant decreases in overall infection rates when applying local vancomycin. Only one study (in spine surgery) found significant increases in infection rates with local vancomycin application. For spine surgery, local vancomycin application had the greatest proportion of gram-negative bacteria (40.7%) isolated compared to S. aureus (42.4%) in controls. In arthroplasty and trauma surgery, there were increases in the proportions of gram-negative bacteria when vancomycin was added. There were no reported systemic adverse reactions associated with local vancomycin use in any of the studies. Conclusion Applying local vancomycin during primary orthopaedic surgery procedures may reduce the rates of infections in multiple different orthopaedic specialties, particularly in spine surgery and sports medicine. However, careful consideration should be applied when administering local vancomycin during specific orthopaedic procedures given the heterogeneity of included studies and breadth of surgeries included in this review. Level of evidence Level III. A systematic review of level I - III studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darius L. Lameire
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jack Soeder
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Ellie Pinsker
- St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nipun Atri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Rush University Medical Centre, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Amir Khoshbin
- St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lenny Radomski
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit Atrey
- St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Servito M, Khani-Hanjani A, Smith KM, Tsuyuki RT, Mullen JC. Topical Vancomycin and Risk of Sternal Wound Infections: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 114:1555-1561. [PMID: 34896412 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of topical vancomycin in the reduction of sternal wound infection (SWI) risk has become a point of contention. Prior literature consists of only observational studies and one unblinded trial. Hence, our objective was to assess whether vancomycin reduces the incidence of SWI in a double-blind randomized controlled trial. METHODS Patients were randomized 1:1 to either vancomycin-soaked (vancomycin) or saline-soaked (control) sponges. The sponges were applied once the sternum was opened and were removed just prior to sternal closure. Patients were followed at three months and one-year post-operatively to determine the incidence of SWI in each group. Results were analyzed according to the modified intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS We assessed 1038 patients for eligibility and enrolled 1037 patients. There were 517 patients randomized to the vancomycin group, and 520 patients to the control group. Analysis was performed on 1021 patients. At three months post-operatively, there was no significant difference in the incidence of SWI between the vancomycin and control groups (2.7% vs 4.1%, p = 0.23). There was also no significant difference between the vancomycin and control groups in the risk of superficial, deep, and organ-space infections. Similar findings were observed one-year post-operatively. The most common organism isolated was Coagulase-negative Staphylococci. CONCLUSIONS The use of vancomycin applied to the sternum during cardiac surgery does not reduce the incidence of SWI. [NCT02374853].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Servito
- School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Abbas Khani-Hanjani
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Kayla-Marie Smith
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Ross T Tsuyuki
- Departments of Pharmacology and Medicine (Cardiology), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - John C Mullen
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kalalinia F, Taherzadeh Z, Jirofti N, Amiri N, Foroghinia N, Beheshti M, Bazzaz BSF, Hashemi M, Shahroodi A, Pishavar E, Tabassi SAS, Movaffagh J. Evaluation of wound healing efficiency of vancomycin-loaded electrospun chitosan/poly ethylene oxide nanofibers in full thickness wound model of rat. Int J Biol Macromol 2021; 177:100-110. [PMID: 33539956 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Revised: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Electrospun hybrid nanofibers have been extensively regarded as drug carriers. This study tries to introduce a nano fibrous wound dressing as a new strategy for a topical drug-delivery system. The vancomycin (VCM)-loaded hybrid chitosan/poly ethylene oxide (CH/PEO) nanofibers were fabricated by the blend-electrospinning process. Morphological, mechanical, chemical, and biological properties of nanofibers were examined by SEM, FTIR, release profile study, tensile assay, Alamar Blue cytotoxicity evaluation, and antibacterial activity assay. In vivo wound healing activity of hybrid CH/PEO/VCM nanofibers was evaluated in full-thickness skin wounds of rats. The hybrid CH/PEO/VCM nanofibers were successfully fabricated in a nanometer. The CH/PEO/VCM 2.5% had higher Young's Modulus, better tensile strength, smaller fiber diameter with sustained-release profiles compared to CH/PEO/VCM 5%. All nanofibers did not show any significant cytotoxicity (P < 0.05) on the normal fibroblast cells. Also, VCM-load hybrid CH/PEO nanofibers successfully inhibited bacterial growth. The wound area in the rats treated with CH/PEO/VCM 2.5% was less than CH/PEO/VCM 5% treated group. According to histological evaluation, the CH/PEO/VCM 2.5% group showed the fastest wound healing than other treatment groups. Results of this study proposed that CH/PEO/VCM nanofibers could promote the wound healing process by reducing the side effects of VCM as a topical antimicrobial agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Kalalinia
- Biotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
| | - Zhila Taherzadeh
- Neurogenic Inflammation Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Nafiseh Jirofti
- Biotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Chemical and Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
| | - Nafise Amiri
- Department of Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Neda Foroghinia
- Department of Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Mona Beheshti
- Neurogenic Inflammation Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Department of Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Bibi Sedigheh Fazly Bazzaz
- Biotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Pharmaceutical Control Department, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Maryam Hashemi
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Nanotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Azadeh Shahroodi
- Targeted Drug Delivery Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Elham Pishavar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Nanotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Seyed Abolghasem Sajadi Tabassi
- Targeted Drug Delivery Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Jebrail Movaffagh
- Targeted Drug Delivery Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|