1
|
Liu JX, Wang ZY, Niu SX, Sai XY, Zhang X, Zhang XP, Ma X. Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy for cancer detection in patients with gray-zone prostate-specific antigen: a multicenter, real-world study. Asian J Androl 2024:00129336-990000000-00175. [PMID: 38624201 DOI: 10.4103/aja20241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Knowledge about the effect of different prostate biopsy approaches on the prostate cancer detection rate (CDR) in patients with gray-zone prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is limited. We performed this study to compare the CDR among patients who underwent different biopsy approaches and had rising PSA levels in the gray zone. Two hundred and twenty-two patients who underwent transrectal prostate biopsy (TRB) and 216 patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy (TPB) between June 2016 and September 2022 were reviewed in this study. In addition, 110 patients who received additional targeted biopsies following the systematic TPB were identified. Clinical parameters, including age, PSA derivative, prostate volume (PV), and needle core count, were recorded. The data were fitted via propensity score matching (PSM), adjusting for potential confounders. TPB outperformed TRB in terms of the CDR (49.6% vs 28.3%, P = 0.001). The clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rate was not significantly different between TPB and TRB (78.6% vs 68.8%, P = 0.306). In stratified analysis, TPB outperformed TRB in CDR when the age of patients was 65-75 years (59.0% vs 22.0%, P < 0.001), when PV was 25.00-50.00 ml (63.2% vs 28.3%, P < 0.001), and when needle core count was no more than 12 (58.5% vs 31.5%, P = 0.005). The CDR (P = 0.712) and detection rate of csPCa (P = 0.993) did not significantly differ among the systematic, targeted, and combined biopsies. TPB outperformed TRB in CDR for patients with gray-zone PSA. Moreover, performing target biopsy after systematic TPB provided no additional benefits in CDR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun-Xiao Liu
- The Graduate School, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Ze-Yuan Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
| | - Shao-Xi Niu
- Department of Urology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Xiao-Yong Sai
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Statistics, The Graduate School, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Xu Zhang
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Xue-Pei Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
| | - Xin Ma
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Y, Zhou Z, Zhou Y, Mai Z, Jin S, Liang Z, Shang Z, Zuo Y, Xiao Y, Wang W, Wang H, Yan W. Updated prevalence of latent prostate cancer in Chinese population and comparison of biopsy results: An autopsy-based study. Innovation (N Y) 2024; 5:100558. [PMID: 38261840 PMCID: PMC10794118 DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer detected by autopsy is named latent prostate cancer. As the repertoire of clinical prostate cancer, latent cancer may better reflect the disease burden. Unlike clinical prostate specimens, which are obtained exclusively from biopsy-positive cases, prostate specimens obtained through autopsy provide information on biopsy-negative cases, helping calculate the true sensitivity of prostate biopsy. From 2014 to 2021, we collected autopsy specimens of the prostate from body donors in China and performed transperineal and transrectal biopsies on specimens before step-sectioning and pathological measurements. We found that the crude prevalence of latent prostate cancer in middle-aged and elderly men was 35.1% (81/231), which was higher than previous estimates for Chinese populations. The overall per-patient sensitivities of transperineal and transrectal biopsies were not significantly different (33.3% vs. 32.1%, p = 0.82), but the two approaches differed in preferential sampling area along the proximal-distal axis of the prostate. Transperineal biopsy had a higher sensitivity for detecting clinically significant lesions in the distal third (34.7% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.02) and distal half (30.6% vs. 18.1%, p = 0.04), while transrectal biopsy had a higher sensitivity for lesions in the proximal half (25.0% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.046). Both transperineal and transrectal methods of biopsy missed most small lesions (<0.1 mL) and 35.3% (6/17) of large lesions (>0.5 mL). In conclusion, the prevalence of latent prostate cancer in China has increased over the past 2 decades. Systematic transperineal and transrectal methods of biopsy had comparable sensitivities but had different preferential sampling areas. Both approaches miss one-third of large lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuliang Chen
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zhien Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Yi Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zhipeng Mai
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Shijie Jin
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zhen Liang
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zhiyuan Shang
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Beijing Hospital, National Centre of Gerontology, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Yuzhi Zuo
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Yu Xiao
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Wenze Wang
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Haibo Wang
- Peking University Clinical Research Institute, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Weigang Yan
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fang JH, Zhang L, Xie X, Zhao P, Bao L, Kong F. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy versus systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer. PeerJ 2023; 11:e16614. [PMID: 38107582 PMCID: PMC10725670 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To examine the accuracy of transperineal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy (FB) in identifying men with prostate cancer (PCa) that has reached a clinically relevant stage. Methods This investigation enrolled 459 males. In 210 of these patients (FB group), transperineal MRI/US fusion-guided biopsies were performed on the suspicious region, and in 249 others, a systematic biopsy (SB) was performed (SB group). We compared these groups using Gleason scores and rates of cancer detection. Results PCa cases counted 198/459 (43.1%), including 94/249 (37.8%) in the SB group and 104/210 (49.5%) in the FB group. FB was associated with higher overall diagnostic accuracy relative to SB (88.5% and 72.3%, P = 0.024). FB exhibited greater sensitivity than SB (88.9% and 71.2%, P = 0.025). The area under the curve for FB and SB approaches was 0.837 and 0.737, respectively, such that FB was associated with an 11.9% increase in accuracy as determined based upon these AUC values. Relative to SB, FB was better able to detect high-grade tumors (GS ≥ 7) (78.85% vs. 60.64%, P = 0.025). Conclusion Transperineal MRI-US fusion targeted biopsy is superior to the systematic one as an approach to diagnosing clinically significant PCa, as it is a viable technical approach to prostate biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-hua Fang
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hang Zhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Liqing Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hang Zhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xi Xie
- Department of Urology Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hang Zhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Pan Zhao
- Department of Pathology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hang Zhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lingyun Bao
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hang Zhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Fanlei Kong
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hang Zhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lu M, Luo Y, Wang Y, Yu J, Zheng H, Yang Z. Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective study based on 452 patients. BMC Urol 2023; 23:11. [PMID: 36709292 PMCID: PMC9883893 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01176-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transrectal (TR) ultrasound guided prostate biopsy and transperineal (TP) ultrasound guided prostate biopsy are the two most commonly used methods to detect prostate cancer, the detection rate of the two biopsy approaches may differ in patients with different clinical characteristics. Here we aimed to compare the prostate cancer detection rate and positive rate of biopsy cores between TR and TP prostate biopsy in patients with different clinical characteristics. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed and compared the clinical data of 452 patients underwent TR or TP prostate biopsy in our hospital from June 2017 to September 2021. And patients were stratified according to several clinical characteristic (serum PSA level, prostate volume, PSA density, T stage and ISUP grade), cancer detection rate and positive rate of biopsy cores were compared in different stratified groups. RESULTS There was no significant difference in age, PSA level, prostate volume, and PSA density between the TR and TP groups. TR group had a higher overall cancer detection rate and positive rate of biopsy cores than TP group. Further subgroup analysis showed that TR group had a higher cancer detection rate in patients with prostate volumes 30-80 mL, and that the TR group had a higher positive rate of biopsy cores among the patients with T3-T4 stages, while TP group had a higher positive rates of biopsy cores among the patients with T1-T2 stages. There were no significant differences between the TR and TP groups for each subgroup when stratified by PSA level, PSA density and ISUP grade. CONCLUSIONS TR approach may have advantage in patients with prostate volumes 30-80 mL and T3-T4 stages, while TP approach may have advantage in patients with T1-T2 stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengxin Lu
- grid.413247.70000 0004 1808 0969Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071 Hubei China
| | - Yi Luo
- grid.413247.70000 0004 1808 0969Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071 Hubei China
| | - Yongzhi Wang
- grid.413247.70000 0004 1808 0969Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071 Hubei China
| | - Jingtian Yu
- grid.413247.70000 0004 1808 0969Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071 Hubei China
| | - Hang Zheng
- grid.413247.70000 0004 1808 0969Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071 Hubei China
| | - Zhonghua Yang
- grid.413247.70000 0004 1808 0969Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071 Hubei China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Power J, Murphy M, Hutchinson B, Murphy D, McNicholas M, O'Malley K, Murray J, Cronin C. Transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: what the radiologist needs to know. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:77. [PMID: 35467261 PMCID: PMC9038983 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01210-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Transperineal ultrasound-guided (TP) prostate biopsy has been shown to significantly decrease the risk of post-procedural sepsis when compared to transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) prostate biopsy. With guidance from the European Urology Association favouring adoption of a TP biopsy route, it is clear that, despite being a more technically challenging procedure, TP biopsy in an outpatient setting will replace TRUS biopsy. This paper gives the reader a succinct summary of outpatient transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthetic utilising a free-hand ultrasound technique. Patient preparation and consent process is outlined. A comprehensive pictorial review of the procedure, pitfalls and common post-procedural outcomes is presented. This paper provides a framework and guide for those wishing to adopt the transperineal approach under local anaesthetic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Power
- Radiology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles St, Dublin 7, Ireland. .,School of Medicine, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Mark Murphy
- Radiology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles St, Dublin 7, Ireland.,School of Medicine, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Barry Hutchinson
- Radiology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles St, Dublin 7, Ireland.,School of Medicine, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Daragh Murphy
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.,Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michelle McNicholas
- Radiology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles St, Dublin 7, Ireland.,School of Medicine, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.,Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kiaran O'Malley
- Radiology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles St, Dublin 7, Ireland.,School of Medicine, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.,Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John Murray
- Radiology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles St, Dublin 7, Ireland.,School of Medicine, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.,Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Carmel Cronin
- Radiology Department, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles St, Dublin 7, Ireland.,School of Medicine, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.,Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koparal MY, Sözen TS, Karşıyakalı N, Aslan G, Akdoğan B, Şahin B, Türkeri L. Comparison of transperineal and transrectal targeted prostate biopsy using Mahalanobis distance matching within propensity score caliper method: A multicenter study of Turkish Urooncology Association. Prostate 2022; 82:425-432. [PMID: 34927740 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC)-detecting results of transperineal and transrectal targeted biopsy (TPTB and TRTB, respectively) by performing matching analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study has used the PC and prostate biopsy database from the Turkish Urooncology Association. A total of 1143 patients with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) with ≥3 lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and who had received a software-guided transperineal/transrectal MRI/transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy with concomitant standard systematic 12-core biopsy were included in this study. csPC detection rates of the TP and TR approaches were compared following Mahalanobis distance matching within propensity score caliper method. The following four variables were selected as covariates for the matching procedure: age, digital rectal examination findings, PSA density, and the index lesion PI-RADS score. RESULTS The matched sample included 508 TR and 276 TP patients. In both the TP and the TR groups, targeted biopsy was superior to systematic biopsy in detecting csPC (27.5% vs. 24.6%, p < 0.001 and 19.5% vs. 16.3%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Both TPTB and TP systematic biopsy was found to be superior to TRTB and TR systematic biopsy in terms of csPC detection (27.5% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.012 and 24.6% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.006). In patients with an anterior index lesion, an apical index lesion, and a larger prostate, the superiority of TPTB to TRTB was found to be more prominent in terms of csPC detection (37.8% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.044; 34.6% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.002; and 25% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.033, respectively). CONCLUSION Targeted biopsy was found to be superior to systematic biopsy in detecting csPC in both the TP and the TR approaches. The TP approach is preferred because of its clear superiority in detecting csPC in targeted biopsy, especially in patients with anterior and apical lesions and with larger prostates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tevfik Sinan Sözen
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nejdet Karşıyakalı
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Acıbadem University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Güven Aslan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Bülent Akdoğan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bahadır Şahin
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Levent Türkeri
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Acıbadem University, İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rabah D, Al-Taweel W, Khan F, Arafa M, Mehmood S, Mokhtar A, Farhat K. Transperineal versus transrectal multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion targeted prostate biopsy. Saudi Med J 2021; 42:649-654. [PMID: 34078727 PMCID: PMC9149710 DOI: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.6.20200771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare transperineal biopsies (TPBx) with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUSBx) in order to provide evidence, making clinicians able to select the appropriate biopsy approach under different conditions. METHODS A comparative prospective study, conducted in King Khalid University Hospital (KKUH) and King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSH&RC), Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, between March 2019 and February 2020. All patients with raised prostate-specific antigen or atypical digital rectal examination findings were subjected to multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Those with positive findings were referred to targeted fusion- guided biopsy either TPBx or TRUSBx, randomly. Complication rate, cancer detection rate, and procedure time were recorded. RESULTS Transperineal biopsies and TRUSBx had an equivalent complication rate. However, both case detection rate and clinically significant cancer detection rate were significantly higher in TPBx versus TRUSBx (45.1% versus 29.1%, p=0.003; and 71.8% versus 43.7%, p=0.002; respectively). Transperineal biopsies was a longer procedure than TRUSBx (41.2±0.7 min versus 13±2.3 min, p=0.0001). CONCLUSION No difference in complication rate was detected between the 2 procedures; however, TPBx was more effective for cancer detection in general and clinically significant cancer detection in particular.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danny Rabah
- From the Department of Surgery (Rabah, Khan), College of Medicine; from the Cancer Research Chair (Rabah, Arafa, Farhat), King Saud University, and from the Department of Urology (Rabah, Al-Taweel, Mokhtar), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Waleed Al-Taweel
- From the Department of Surgery (Rabah, Khan), College of Medicine; from the Cancer Research Chair (Rabah, Arafa, Farhat), King Saud University, and from the Department of Urology (Rabah, Al-Taweel, Mokhtar), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Farrukh Khan
- From the Department of Surgery (Rabah, Khan), College of Medicine; from the Cancer Research Chair (Rabah, Arafa, Farhat), King Saud University, and from the Department of Urology (Rabah, Al-Taweel, Mokhtar), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Mostafa Arafa
- From the Department of Surgery (Rabah, Khan), College of Medicine; from the Cancer Research Chair (Rabah, Arafa, Farhat), King Saud University, and from the Department of Urology (Rabah, Al-Taweel, Mokhtar), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Shahbaz Mehmood
- From the Department of Surgery (Rabah, Khan), College of Medicine; from the Cancer Research Chair (Rabah, Arafa, Farhat), King Saud University, and from the Department of Urology (Rabah, Al-Taweel, Mokhtar), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Alaa Mokhtar
- From the Department of Surgery (Rabah, Khan), College of Medicine; from the Cancer Research Chair (Rabah, Arafa, Farhat), King Saud University, and from the Department of Urology (Rabah, Al-Taweel, Mokhtar), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Karim Farhat
- From the Department of Surgery (Rabah, Khan), College of Medicine; from the Cancer Research Chair (Rabah, Arafa, Farhat), King Saud University, and from the Department of Urology (Rabah, Al-Taweel, Mokhtar), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Szabo RJ. "Free-Hand" Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia: Review of the Literature. J Endourol 2021; 35:525-543. [PMID: 33380279 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.1093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The recent plethora of reports of "free-hand" transperineal prostate biopsy (fTP-Bx) under local anesthesia (LA) demonstrate that many centers consider this technique to be a safer and possibly more accurate approach to prostate biopsy in the clinic setting. Materials and Methods: The literature was searched for fTP-Bx, and summary tables were compiled. Studies on the costs of postprostate biopsy sepsis were also researched. Results: The search found 11,999 cases of fTP-Bx under LA with and without sedation over 29 mutually exclusive studies. Pooled averages calculated for age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, PSA density, and cores sampled were 67.3 years, 10.4 ng/mL, 47.7 mL, 0.24 ng/mL/cc, and 15.3 cores, respectively. Detection of overall prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant (Gleason score ≥7) prostate cancer (csPCa) averaged 45.5% (3796/8338) and 25.1% (1141/4541), respectively. After subgrouping the studies by biopsy technique, studies that used MRI/ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy in some or all biopsy cases averaged an overall PCa and csPCa detection rate of 50.0% (741/1483) (p < 0.0001) and 42.8% (635/1483) (p < 0.0001), respectively. Visual analog scale pain ratings and procedure times averaged 3.17 and 13.1 minutes, respectively. Averages for complications of sepsis and acute urinary retention were 0.0% (0/7396) and 2.1% (120/5693), respectively. A total of 10.2% (1055/10,334) of cases received no antibiotic prophylaxis. If fTP-Bx under LA replaced transrectal prostate biopsy (TR-Bx) in the United States, the estimated annual savings would be $341,676,800-$752,540,000 through the virtual elimination of admissions for postbiopsy sepsis. Conclusions: Many centers around the world have adopted fTP-Bx because it virtually eliminates sepsis, may improve detection rates of csPCa and can be easily integrated into a normal clinic workflow using only LA. If all urologists in the United States abandoned TR-Bx for fTP-Bx, the potential savings in health care costs of complications would be significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Szabo
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente, Irvine, California, USA.,Department of Urology, Cinical Associate Professor, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.,Department of Urology, Volunteer Faculty, Veterans Administration Healthcare System, Long Beach, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang C, Wang YY, Wang SY, Ding JX, Ding M, Ruan Y, Wang XH, Jing YF, Han BM, Xia SJ, Jiang CY, Zhao FJ. Peripheral zone PSA density: a predominant variable to improve prostate cancer detection efficiency in men with PSA higher than 4 ng ml -1. Asian J Androl 2021; 23:415-420. [PMID: 33473011 PMCID: PMC8269833 DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_72_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
To improve the diagnostic efficiency of prostate cancer (PCa) and reduce unnecessary biopsies, we defined and analyzed the diagnostic efficiency of peripheral zone prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density (PZ-PSAD). Patients who underwent systematic 12-core prostate biopsies in Shanghai General Hospital (Shanghai, China) between January 2012 and January 2018 were retrospectively identified (n = 529). Another group of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (n = 100) were randomly preselected to obtain the PSA density of the non-PCa cohort (N-PSAD). Prostate volumes and transition zone volumes were measured using multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and were combined with PSA and N-PSAD to obtain the PZ-PSAD from a specific algorithm. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the PCa detection efficiency in patients stratified by PSA level, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of PZ-PSAD was higher than that of PSA, PSA density (PSAD), and transition zone PSA density (TZ-PSAD). PZ-PSAD could amend the diagnosis for more than half of the patients with inaccurate transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and mpMRI results. When TRUS and mpMRI findings were ambiguous to predict PCa (PIRADS score ≤3), PZ-PSAD could increase the positive rate of biopsy from 21.7% to 54.7%, and help 63.8% (150/235) of patients avoid unnecessary prostate biopsy. In patients whose PSA was 4.0–10.0 ng ml−1, 10.1–20.0 ng ml−1, and >20.0 ng ml−1, the ideal PZ-PSAD cut-off value for predicting clinically significant PCa was 0.019 ng ml−2, 0.297 ng ml−2, and 1.180 ng ml−2, respectively (sensitivity >90%). Compared with PSA, PSAD, and TZ-PSAD, the efficiency of PZ-PSAD for predicting PCa is the highest, leading to fewer missed diagnoses and unnecessary biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Wang
- Department of Urology, Jiangsu Jiangyin People's Hospital, Jiangyin 214400, China.,Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Shanghai 200080, China
| | - Yue-Yang Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
| | - Shi-Yuan Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
| | - Ji-Xiang Ding
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Shanghai 200080, China
| | - Mao Ding
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
| | - Yuan Ruan
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
| | - Xiao-Hai Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
| | - Yi-Feng Jing
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
| | - Bang-Min Han
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
| | - Shu-Jie Xia
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
| | - Chen-Yi Jiang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
| | - Fu-Jun Zhao
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.,Department of Urology, Kashgar Prefecture Second People's Hospital, Kashi 844000, China
| |
Collapse
|