1
|
Coccolini F, Cucinotta E, Mingoli A, Zago M, Altieri G, Biloslavo A, Caronna R, Cengeli I, Cicuttin E, Cirocchi R, Cobuccio L, Costa G, Cozza V, Cremonini C, Del Vecchio G, Dinatale G, Fico V, Galatioto C, Kuriara H, Lacavalla D, La Greca A, Larghi A, Mariani D, Mirco P, Occhionorelli S, Parini D, Polistina F, Rimbas M, Sapienza P, Tartaglia D, Tropeano G, Venezia P, Venezia DF, Zaghi C, Chiarugi M. Acute cholecystitis management in high-risk, critically ill, and unfit-for-surgery patients: the Italian Society of Emergency Surgery and Trauma (SICUT) guidelines. Updates Surg 2024; 76:331-343. [PMID: 38153659 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01729-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Dealing with acute cholecystitis in high-risk, critically ill, and unfit-for-surgery patients is frequent during daily practice and requires complex management. Several procedures exist to postpone and/or prevent surgical intervention in those patients who temporarily or definitively cannot undergo surgery. After a systematic review of the literature, an expert panel from the Italian Society of Emergency Surgery and Trauma (SICUT) discussed the different issues and statements in subsequent rounds. The final version of the statements was discussed during the annual meeting in Rome (September 2022). The present paper presents the definitive conclusions of the discussion. Fifteen statements based on the literature evidence were provided. The statements gave precise indications regarding the decisional process and the management of patients who cannot temporarily or definitively undergo cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Acute cholecystitis management in high-risk, critically ill, and unfit-for-surgery patients should be multidisciplinary. The different gallbladder drainage methods must be tailored according to each patient and based on the expertise of the hospital. Percutaneous gallbladder drainage is recommended as the first choice as a bridge to surgery or in severely physiologically deranged patients. Endoscopic gallbladder drainage (cholecystoduodenostomy and cholecystogastrostomy) is suggested as a second-line alternative especially as a definitive procedure for those patients not amenable to surgical management. Trans-papillary gallbladder drainage is the last option to be reserved only to those unfit for other techniques. Delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with percutaneous gallbladder drainage is suggested in all those patients recovering from the conditions that previously discouraged surgical intervention after at least 6 weeks from the gallbladder drainage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa University, Via Paradisia 1, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Eugenio Cucinotta
- General Surgery Department, Messina University Hospital, Messina, Italy
| | - Andrea Mingoli
- Emergency Department, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Zago
- General Surgery Department, Lecco Hospital, Lecco, Italy
| | - Gaia Altieri
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alan Biloslavo
- General Surgery Department, Trieste University Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Roberto Caronna
- General Surgery Department, Messina University Hospital, Messina, Italy
| | - Ismail Cengeli
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa University, Via Paradisia 1, Pisa, Italy
| | - Enrico Cicuttin
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa University, Via Paradisia 1, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- General Surgery Department, Perugia University Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Luigi Cobuccio
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa University, Via Paradisia 1, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gianluca Costa
- General Surgery Department, Campus Biomedico University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Cozza
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Camilla Cremonini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa University, Via Paradisia 1, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | - Valeria Fico
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Hayato Kuriara
- Emergency Surgery Department, Policlinico Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Domenico Lacavalla
- Emergency Surgery Department, Ferrara University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Antonio La Greca
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Diego Mariani
- General Surgery Department, Legnano Hospital, Legnano, Italy
| | - Paolo Mirco
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Dario Parini
- General Surgery Department, Rovigo Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | | | - Mihai Rimbas
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Internal Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Paolo Sapienza
- Emergency Department, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Dario Tartaglia
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa University, Via Paradisia 1, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tropeano
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Piero Venezia
- General Surgery Department, Bari University Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Claudia Zaghi
- General Surgery Department, Vicenza Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa University, Via Paradisia 1, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Manudhane AP, Leupold MD, Shah HW, Shah R, Han SY, Lee PJ, Burlen JJ, Papachristou GI, Krishna SG. A Review on Endoscopic Management of Acute Cholecystitis: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage and Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:212. [PMID: 38399500 PMCID: PMC10890498 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
A percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PCT) is the conventionally favored nonoperative intervention for treating acute cholecystitis. However, PCT is beset by high adverse event rates, need for scheduled reintervention, and inadvertent dislodgement, as well as patient dissatisfaction with a percutaneous drain. Recent advances in endoscopic therapy involve the implementation of endoscopic transpapillary drainage (ETP-GBD) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD), which are increasingly preferred over PCT due to their favorable technical and clinical success combined with lower complication rates. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the literature on EUS-GBD and ETP-GBD, delineating instances when clinicians should opt for endoscopic management and highlighting potential risks associated with each approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert P. Manudhane
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Avenue, Suite 262, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (A.P.M.)
| | - Matthew D. Leupold
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Hamza W. Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Avenue, Suite 262, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (A.P.M.)
| | - Raj Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Avenue, Suite 262, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (A.P.M.)
| | - Samuel Y. Han
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Avenue, Suite 262, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (A.P.M.)
| | - Peter J. Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Avenue, Suite 262, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (A.P.M.)
| | - Jordan J. Burlen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Avenue, Suite 262, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (A.P.M.)
| | - Georgios I. Papachristou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Avenue, Suite 262, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (A.P.M.)
| | - Somashekar G. Krishna
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Avenue, Suite 262, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (A.P.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Trieu JA, Gilman AJ, Hathorn K, Baron TH. Large Single-center Experience with Long-term Outcomes of EUS-guided Transmural Gallbladder Drainage. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023:00004836-990000000-00247. [PMID: 38126805 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
GOALS To describe the long-term outcomes of patients after EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD), including those who underwent standardized stent exchanges for permanent plastic stents. BACKGROUND EUS-GBD has become one of the first-line alternatives for gallbladder decompression, with outcomes and safety profiles comparable to that of percutaneous gallbladder drainage. However, the long-term outcomes of EUS-GBD are not well-described. We report our single-center experience of a large cohort who underwent EUS-GBD. STUDY Patients who underwent EUS-GBD from August 2014 to December 2022 were included in the study. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and procedure details were recorded. Patients were followed until complete stent removal, end of study period, or death. Short and long-term outcomes include technical and clinical success, stent patency, recurrent cholecystitis, cholecystectomy, and death. RESULTS During the study period, 128 patients were included. One hundred and one patients had benign indications for EUS-GBD, including cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis. Of those with malignant indications, 23 of 27 had distal malignant biliary obstruction. Technical and clinical successes were 95.3% and 95.1%, respectively. Stents were exchanged for 2 permanent double pigtail plastic stents in 43.0%. The mean stent patency was 421 days (488 d among those still alive) without any recurrent cholecystitis. CONCLUSION EUS-GBD demonstrates prolonged stent patency and minimal long-term adverse events, particularly among patients who underwent stent exchanges for permanent plastic stents. EUS-GBD is also promising for patients presenting with choledocholithiasis and biliary colic who are not surgical candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judy A Trieu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rimbaş M, Tripodi G, Rizzatti G, Larghi A. Endoscopic ultrasound in the management of acute cholecystitis: Practical review. Dig Endosc 2023; 35:809-818. [PMID: 37253177 DOI: 10.1111/den.14605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has emerged over the last years as an alternative procedure to percutaneous drainage (PT)-GBD in patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) at high surgical risk. This process has been driven by the advent of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) with electrocautery-enhanced capability, which has rendered the drainage procedure easier to accomplish and safer. Studies and meta-analyses have proven the superiority of EUS-GBD over PT-GBD in high-surgical-risk patients with AC. Little evidence exists in the same setting that EUS-GBD compares equally with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Moreover, EUS-GBD might theoretically have a possible role in patients at high surgical risk with an indication to undergo cholecystectomy or with a high probability of conversion from LC to open cholecystectomy. Properly designed studies are needed to better clarify the role of EUS-GBD in these patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihai Rimbaş
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
- Clinic of Internal Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Giulia Tripodi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianenrico Rizzatti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ashat M, El-Abiad R, Shrigiriwar A, Khashab MA. Interventional Endoscopic Ultrasound: Current Status and Future Frontiers. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:1768-1778. [PMID: 37646335 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Interventional endoscopic ultrasound has fueled remarkable advancements in the field of therapeutic procedures, revolutionizing minimally invasive interventions for a diverse range of conditions. This review highlights the latest breakthroughs and advancements in therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound, showcasing its potential to transform patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munish Ashat
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, USA
| | - Rami El-Abiad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, USA
| | - Apurva Shrigiriwar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chavarría C, Sancho-Del Val L, Rueda-Camino JA, Cuadrado-Tiemblo C, Castaño-Milla C. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage as a treatment for acute perforated cholecystitis. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2023; 115:404-405. [PMID: 36353953 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.9315/2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
Acute perforated cholecystitis is a rare but severe complication of acute cholecystitis. Currently, EUS-GBD using LAMS is the preferred choice for gallbladder drainage in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis unfit for cholecystectomy. However, it has been suggested to avoid this procedure when there is suspicion of gallbladder perforation or necrosis. The evidence of EUS-GBD in this setting is scarce. Our case demonstrates that EUS-GBD with LAMS can be effective in the management of type II perforation of the gallbladder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Chavarría
- Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, España
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Koutlas NJ, Pawa S, Russell G, Pawa R. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage: Beyond Cholecystitis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13111933. [PMID: 37296785 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is an alternative to surgery for acute cholecystitis (AC) in poor operative candidates. However, the role of EUS-GBD in non-cholecystitis (NC) indications has not been well studied. We compared the clinical outcomes of EUS-GBD for AC and NC indications. Consecutive patients undergoing EUS-GBD for all indications at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-one patients underwent EUS-GBD during the study period. Thirty-nine (76%) patients had AC while 12 (24%) had NC indications. NC indications included malignant biliary obstruction (n = 8), symptomatic cholelithiasis (n = 1), gallstone pancreatitis (n = 1), choledocholithiasis (n = 1), and Mirizzi's syndrome (n = 1). Technical success was noted in 92% (36/39) for AC and 92% (11/12) for NC (p > 0.99). The clinical success rate was 94% and 100%, respectively (p > 0.99). There were four adverse events in the AC group and 3 in the NC group (p = 0.33). Procedure duration (median 43 vs. 45 min, p = 0.37), post-procedure length of stay (median 3 vs. 3 days, p = 0.97), and total gallbladder-related procedures (median 2 vs. 2, p = 0.59) were similar. EUS-GBD for NC indications is similarly safe and effective as EUS-GBD in AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J Koutlas
- Department of Medicine, Section on Gastroenterology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Swati Pawa
- Department of Medicine, Section on Gastroenterology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Greg Russell
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Rishi Pawa
- Department of Medicine, Section on Gastroenterology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided cholecystostomy versus percutaneous cholecystostomy (PTC) in the management of acute cholecystitis in patients unfit for surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 37:2421-2438. [PMID: 36289089 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09712-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Surgical cholecystectomy is the gold standard strategy for the management of acute cholecystitis (AC). However, some patients are considered unfit for surgery due to certain comorbid conditions. As such, we aimed to compare less invasive treatment strategies such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) and percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PT-GBD) for the management of patients with AC who are suboptimal candidates for surgical cholecystectomy. METHODS A comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases was performed to identify all the studies comparing EUS-GBD versus PT-GBD for patients with AC who were unfit for surgery. A subgroup analysis was also performed for comparison of the group undergoing drainage via cautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) versus PT-GBD. The outcomes included technical and clinical success, adverse events (AEs), recurrent cholecystitis, reintervention, and hospital readmission. RESULTS Eleven studies including 1155 patients were included in the statistical analysis. There was no difference between PT-GBD and EUS-GBD in all the evaluated outcomes. On the subgroup analysis, the endoscopic approach with cautery-enhanced LAMS was associated with lower rates of adverse events (RD = - 0.33 (95% CI - 0.52 to - 0.14; p = 0.0006), recurrent cholecystitis (- 0.05 RD (95% CI - 0.09 to - 0.02; p = 0.02), and hospital readmission (- 0.36 RD (95% CI-0.70 to - 0.03; p = 0.03) when compared to PT-GBD. All other outcomes were similar in the subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS EUS-GBD using cautery-enhanced LAMS is superior to PT-GBD in terms of safety profile, recurrent cholecystitis, and hospital readmission rates in the management of patients with acute cholecystitis who are suboptimal candidates for cholecystectomy. However, when cautery-enhanced LAMS are not used, the outcomes of EUS-GBD and PT-GBD are similar. Thus, EUS-GBD with cautery-enhanced LAMS should be considered the preferable approach for gallbladder drainage for this challenging population.
Collapse
|
9
|
van Wanrooij RLJ, Bronswijk M, Kunda R, Everett SM, Lakhtakia S, Rimbas M, Hucl T, Badaoui A, Law R, Arcidiacono PG, Larghi A, Giovannini M, Khashab MA, Binmoeller KF, Barthet M, Pérez-Miranda M, van Hooft JE, van der Merwe SW. Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy 2022; 54:310-332. [PMID: 35114696 DOI: 10.1055/a-1738-6780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
1: ESGE recommends a prolonged course of a prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotic in patients with ascites who are undergoing therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedures.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 2: ESGE recommends placement of partially or fully covered self-expandable metal stents during EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy for biliary drainage in malignant disease.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends EUS-guided pancreatic duct (PD) drainage should only be performed in high volume expert centers, owing to the complexity of this technique and the high risk of adverse events.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 4: ESGE recommends a stepwise approach to EUS-guided PD drainage in patients with favorable anatomy, starting with rendezvous-assisted endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (RV-ERP), followed by antegrade or transmural drainage only when RV-ERP fails or is not feasible.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5: ESGE suggests performing transduodenal EUS-guided gallbladder drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS), rather than using the transgastric route, as this may reduce the risk of stent dysfunction.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 6: ESGE recommends using saline instillation for small-bowel distension during EUS-guided gastroenterostomy.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 7: ESGE recommends the use of saline instillation with a 19G needle and an electrocautery-enhanced LAMS for EUS-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (EDGE) procedures.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 8: ESGE recommends the use of either 15- or 20-mm LAMSs for EDGE, with a preference for 20-mm LAMSs when considering a same-session ERCP.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy L J van Wanrooij
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, AGEM Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Bronswijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rastislav Kunda
- Department of Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and Department of Advanced Interventional Endoscopy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Simon M Everett
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Sundeep Lakhtakia
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospitals, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, India
| | - Mihai Rimbas
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Tomas Hucl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Abdenor Badaoui
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Ryan Law
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, and Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marc Giovannini
- Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Department of Gastrointestinal Disease, Marseille, France
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kenneth F Binmoeller
- Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Marc Barthet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aix-Marseille Université, APHM, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
| | - Manuel Pérez-Miranda
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Schalk W van der Merwe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van der Merwe SW, van Wanrooij RLJ, Bronswijk M, Everett S, Lakhtakia S, Rimbas M, Hucl T, Kunda R, Badaoui A, Law R, Arcidiacono PG, Larghi A, Giovannini M, Khashab MA, Binmoeller KF, Barthet M, Perez-Miranda M, van Hooft JE. Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2022; 54:185-205. [PMID: 34937098 DOI: 10.1055/a-1717-1391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 76.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
1: ESGE recommends the use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) over percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in malignant distal biliary obstruction when local expertise is available.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 2: ESGE suggests EUS-BD with hepaticogastrostomy only for malignant inoperable hilar biliary obstruction with a dilated left hepatic duct when inadequately drained by ERCP and/or PTBD in high volume expert centers.Weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends that EUS-guided pancreatic duct (PD) drainage should only be considered in symptomatic patients with an obstructed PD when retrograde endoscopic intervention fails or is not possible.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 4: ESGE recommends rendezvous EUS techniques over transmural PD drainage in patients with favorable anatomy owing to its lower rate of adverse events.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5: ESGE recommends that, in patients at high surgical risk, EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (GBD) should be favored over percutaneous gallbladder drainage where both techniques are available, owing to the lower rates of adverse events and need for re-interventions in EUS-GBD.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 6: ESGE recommends EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE), in an expert setting, for malignant gastric outlet obstruction, as an alternative to enteral stenting or surgery.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 7: ESGE recommends that EUS-GE may be considered in the management of afferent loop syndrome, especially in the setting of malignancy or in poor surgical candidates. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 8: ESGE suggests that endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) can be offered, in expert centers, to patients with a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass following multidisciplinary decision-making, with the aim of overcoming the invasiveness of laparoscopy-assisted ERCP and the limitations of enteroscopy-assisted ERCP.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Schalk W van der Merwe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roy L J van Wanrooij
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, AGEM Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Bronswijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Simon Everett
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Sundeep Lakhtakia
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospitals, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, India
| | - Mihai Rimbas
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Tomas Hucl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Rastislav Kunda
- Department of Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and Department of Advanced Interventional Endoscopy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Abdenor Badaoui
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Ryan Law
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Paolo G Arcidiacono
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, and Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marc Giovannini
- Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Department of Gastrointestinal Disease, Marseille, France
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kenneth F Binmoeller
- Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Marc Barthet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aix-Marseille Université, APHM, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
| | - Manuel Perez-Miranda
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zachäus M, Bartels M, Flade A, Schubert-Hartmann A, Lamberts R, Sepehri-Shamloo A, Halm UP. [Endoscopic Ultrasound Drainage of the Gallbladder in Acute Cholecystitis in Patients at High Surgical Risk]. Zentralbl Chir 2021; 148:140-146. [PMID: 34763360 DOI: 10.1055/a-1657-0197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard treatment for acute cholecystitis is laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Alternative procedures are used for patients at high surgical risk. Percutaneous drainage is widely available. The alternative of transpapillary drainage of the gallbladder via the ductus cysticus has only limited prospects of success. With the widespread use of interventional endoscopic ultrasound and the development of new stent systems, endoscopic ultrasound gallbladder drainage has proven to be a safe and reliable procedure. MATERIAL AND METHOD We retrospectively report on our experiences in 11 consecutive patients with endoscopic ultrasound gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis between December 2018 and January 2021. RESULTS 11 patients with acute cholecystitis with a mean age of 84.5 years (70-95 years) are reported. All patients had severe general comorbidities or advanced abdominal tumours or a combination of these conditions. After interdisciplinary debate, the indication for interventional therapy was made. This was carried out in 9 cases by means of endosonographic drainage alone and in 2 cases by means of percutaneous and two-stage endosonographic drainage. Technical success was achieved in 10 cases (91%), clinical success in 9 cases (82%). In 2 cases there were procedural complications that led to the operation. CONCLUSION In the case of high surgical risks, endosonographic drainage of the gall bladder is a safe and definitive therapy. This can be performed alone or in combination with percutaneous drainage. Endoscopic ultrasound drainage is superior to percutaneous drainage alone, due to its lower complication rates and lower rates of necessary follow-up interventions. Therefore, in cases of relatively high surgical risk, endoscopic ultrasound drainage of the gall bladder should be preferred to percutaneous drainage, especially when definitive therapy is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Zachäus
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Hämatologie, Onkologie, Palliativmedizin, HELIOS Park-Klinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Michael Bartels
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, HELIOS Park-Klinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Flade
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, HELIOS Park-Klinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Schubert-Hartmann
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Hämatologie, Onkologie, Palliativmedizin, HELIOS Park-Klinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Regina Lamberts
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Hämatologie, Onkologie, Palliativmedizin, HELIOS Park-Klinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | | | - Ulrich Paul Halm
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Hämatologie, Onkologie, Palliativmedizin, HELIOS Park-Klinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Flynn DJ, Memel Z, Hernandez-Barco Y, Visrodia KH, Casey BW, Krishnan K. Outcomes of EUS-guided transluminal gallbladder drainage in patients without cholecystitis. Endosc Ultrasound 2021; 10:381-386. [PMID: 34677160 PMCID: PMC8544015 DOI: 10.4103/eus-d-21-00040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Cholecystectomy is the gold standard for most gallbladder-related disease. However, many patients with gallbladder disease are poor surgical candidates. Current nonsurgical gallbladder drainage (GBD) methods include percutaneous cholecystostomy and endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal GBD (EUS-GBD). Outcomes for EUS-GBD for the treatment of noncholecystitis (NC) gallbladder disease have not been defined. Materials and Methods: Cases were identified using procedural data from a quaternary academic hospital for endoscopic procedures from 2015 to 2020. Patients who underwent EUS-GBD for acute cholecystitis, biliary colic, gallstone pancreatitis, and secondary prevention of gallstone disease were included. Results: Fifty-five cases of EUS-GBD were identified over the 5-year study period. Forty-one cases were performed for acute cholecystitis, and 15 were performed for other NC indications. Indications for NC drainage included primary treatment of symptomatic biliary colic and secondary prevention of gallstone pancreatitis and choledocholithiasis. There was no statistically significant difference in complications, mortality, or reintervention requirements. There was a 13.3% rate of immediate complications in the NC group, which were all medically managed. Conclusions: EUS-GBD appears to be a safe and effective way to manage gallstone disease in nonsurgical candidates with NC gallbladder-related disease. Overall complications and readmissions were infrequent. Complication rates were similar to those published in patients who underwent EUS-GBD for acute cholecystitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duncan J Flynn
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Zoe Memel
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Brenna W Casey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kumar Krishnan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ogura T, Okuda A, Nishioka N, Yamada M, Higuchi K. Double puncture of the stomach and duodenum during EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (with video). Endosc Ultrasound 2021; 10:390-392. [PMID: 34213431 PMCID: PMC8544007 DOI: 10.4103/eus-d-20-00256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Ogura
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Atsushi Okuda
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Nobu Nishioka
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masanori Yamada
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuhide Higuchi
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rana SS. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage: a technical review. Ann Gastroenterol 2021; 34:142-148. [PMID: 33654351 PMCID: PMC7903569 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2020.0568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has emerged as a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative to both percutaneous and endoscopic transpapillary GBD in patients with acute cholecystitis. Over the last few years, the technique, as well as the indications for EUS-GBD have been gradually evolving, and the procedure has become simpler and safer as the accepted indications have expanded. The development of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) has allowed us to realize the dream of creating endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomoses, and has thus paved the way for a safer EUS-GBD. Single step EUS-guided LAMS delivery systems have obviated the use of other endoscopic accessories and thus made EUS-GBD simpler and safer. However, EUS-GBD can be associated with potentially serious complications, and therefore should be performed by expert interventional endosonologists at centers with surgical and radiological back up. EUS-GBD is a relatively new procedure still in its infancy, but continued improvement in EUS accessories and dedicated stents will make this procedure safer and also expand its current indications. This review focuses on the technical aspects, including procedural details, as well as the complications of EUS-GBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surinder S Rana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Matsuyama R, Yabusita Y, Homma Y, Kumamoto T, Endo I. Essential updates 2019/2020: Surgical treatment of gallbladder cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:152-161. [PMID: 33860135 PMCID: PMC8034687 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder cancer is a biliary tract cancer that originates in the gallbladder and cystic ducts and is recognized worldwide as a refractory cancer with early involvement of the surrounding area because of its anatomical characteristics. Although the number of cases is increasing steadily worldwide, the frequency of this disease remains low, making it difficult to plan large-scale clinical studies, and there is still much discussion about the indications for surgical resection and the introduction of multidisciplinary treatment. Articles published between 2019 and 2020 were reviewed, focusing mainly on the indications for surgical resection for each tumor stage, the treatment of incidental gallbladder cancer, and current trends in minimally invasive surgery for gallbladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryusei Matsuyama
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| | - Yasuhiro Yabusita
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| | - Yuki Homma
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| | - Takafumi Kumamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang Y, Zhang B, Wang Y, Zhang J, Wu Y, Xiao T, Liao Y, Bao Y, Qiu H, Sun S, Guo J. Advances in the Prevention and Treatment of Esophageal Stricture after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early Esophageal Cancer. J Transl Int Med 2020; 8:135-145. [PMID: 33062589 PMCID: PMC7534493 DOI: 10.2478/jtim-2020-0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the main treatment for early esophageal cancer. While treating the disease, ESD may also cause postoperative esophageal stricture, which is a global issue that needs resolution. Various methods have been applied to resolve the problem, such as mechanical dilatation, glucocorticoids, anti-scarring drugs, and regenerative medicine; however, no standard treatment regimen exists. This article describes and evaluates the strengths and limitations of new and promising potential strategies for the treatment and prevention of esophageal strictures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Baozhen Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Yidan Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Jingjing Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Yufan Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Tingyue Xiao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Ye Liao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Yiwen Bao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Hongyu Qiu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Siyu Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Jintao Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Søreide JA, Fjetland A, Desserud KF, Greve OJ, Fjetland L. Percutaneous cholecystostomy - An option in selected patients with acute cholecystitis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e20101. [PMID: 32384483 PMCID: PMC7440289 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000020101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
While urgent percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) was introduced as an alternative to acute surgical treatment for acute cholecystitis (AC), the current place of PC in the treatment algorithm for AC is challenged. We evaluate demographics and outcomes of PC in routine clinical practice in a population-based cohort.Retrospective evaluation of consecutive patients treated with PC for AC between 2000 and 2015. The severity of cholecystitis was graded according to the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines.One hundred forty-nine patients were included (82; 55% males) (median age of 72.5 years; range, 21-92). The Tokyo Guidelines criteria of 2013 (TG13) severity grade distribution was 4%, 61.7%, and 34.2% for grades I, II, and III, respectively. No difference was observed between males and females with regard to age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, comorbidities, or previous history of cholecystitis. PC was successfully performed in all but 1 patient, and complications were few and minor. Less than half (48.3%) of all patients subsequently received definitive surgical treatment, mostly (83.3%) laparoscopy. No or minor complications were encountered in 58 (80.6%) patients. Operated patients were significantly younger (P = <.001) and had lower ASA scores (P = .005), less comorbidities (P < .001), and had more seldomly a severe grade 3 cholecystitis (P < .001) than non-operated patients.PC is useful in selected patients with AC. However, since only a half of the patients eventually received definitive surgical treatment, a better routine decision-making based on proper criteria may enable an improved allocation of the individual patient for tailored treatment according to the disease severity, the patient's comorbidity burden, and also to the treatment options available at the institution to prevent overutilization of a non-definitive treatment approach. Comprehension of this responsibility should be acknowledged by hospitals with an emergency surgical service, although the clinical decision-making remains a challenge of the responsible surgeon on call.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Arne Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen
| | - Anja Fjetland
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger
| | - Kari F. Desserud
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger
| | - Ole Jakob Greve
- Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Lars Fjetland
- Department of Radiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|