1
|
Troncone E, Amendola R, Moscardelli A, De Cristofaro E, De Vico P, Paoluzi OA, Monteleone G, Perez-Miranda M, Del Vecchio Blanco G. Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage: A Comprehensive Review on Indications, Techniques, and Future Perspectives. Medicina (Kaunas) 2024; 60:633. [PMID: 38674279 PMCID: PMC11052411 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60040633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
In recent years, therapeutic endoscopy has become a fundamental tool in the management of gallbladder diseases in light of its minimal invasiveness, high clinical efficacy, and good safety profile. Both endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (TGBD) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) provide effective internal drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis unfit for cholecystectomy, avoiding the drawbacks of external percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PGBD). The availability of dedicated lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for EUS-guided transluminal interventions contributed to the expansion of endoscopic therapies for acute cholecystitis, making endoscopic gallbladder drainage easier, faster, and hence more widely available. Moreover, EUS-GBD with LAMS opened the possibility of several cholecystoscopy-guided interventions, such as gallstone lithotripsy and clearance. Finally, EUS-GBD has also been proposed as a rescue drainage modality in malignant biliary obstruction after failure of standard techniques, with encouraging results. In this review, we will describe the TBGD and EUS-GBD techniques, and we will discuss the available data on clinical efficacy in different settings in comparison with PGBD. Finally, we will comment on the future perspectives of EUS-GBD, discussing the areas of uncertainty in which new data are more strongly awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Troncone
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Rosa Amendola
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Elena De Cristofaro
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale De Vico
- Department of Anaesthesia, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Monteleone
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Manuel Perez-Miranda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Rio Hortega, 47012 Valladolid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fugazza A, Khalaf K, Pawlak KM, Spadaccini M, Colombo M, Andreozzi M, Giacchetto M, Carrara S, Ferrari C, Binda C, Mangiavillano B, Anderloni A, Repici A. Use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage as a rescue approach in cases of unsuccessful biliary drainage. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:70-78. [PMID: 38293324 PMCID: PMC10823897 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i1.70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
This narrative review provides an overview of the utilization of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) as a salvage approach in cases of unsuccessful conventional management. EUS-GBD is a minimally invasive and effective technique for drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis with high risk of surgery. The procedure has demonstrated impressive technical and clinical success rates with low rates of adverse events, making it a safe and effective option for appropriate candidates. Furthermore, EUS-GBD can also serve as a rescue option for patients who have failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or EUS biliary drainage for relief of jaundice in malignant biliary stricture. However, patient selection is critical for the success of EUS-GBD, and proper patient selection and risk assessment are important to ensure the safety and efficacy of the procedure. As the field continues to evolve and mature, ongoing research will further refine our understanding of the benefits and limitations of EUS-GBD, ultimately leading to improved outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Fugazza
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Kareem Khalaf
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto M5B 1W8, ON, Canada
| | - Katarzyna M Pawlak
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto M5B 1W8, ON, Canada
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Matteo Colombo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Marta Andreozzi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Marco Giacchetto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Chiara Ferrari
- Department of Anesthesia, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, Romagna 47121, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Anderloni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia 27100, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano 20089, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang J, Hu JL, Sun SY. Endoscopic ultrasound guided gastroenterostomy: Technical details updates, clinical outcomes, and adverse events. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 15:634-640. [DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i11.634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) has been transformed from an innovative technique, into a viable alternative to enteral stenting and surgical gastrointestinal anastomosis for patients with gastric outlet obstruction. Even EUS-GE guided ERCP and EUS-guided gastrointestinal anastomosis for the treatment of afferent loop syndrome have been performed, giving patients more less invasive options. However, EUS-GE is still a technically challenging procedure. In order to improve EUS-GE, several techniques have been reported to improve the technical details. With EUS-GE widely performed, more data about EUS-GE’s clinical outcomes have been reported. The aim of the current review is to describe technical details updates, clinical outcomes, and adverse events of EUS-GE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, People's Hospital of Shenyang Economic and Technological Development Zone, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Jin-Long Hu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Si-Yu Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hudson JL, Baron TH. Endoscopic Management of Gallbladder Disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2023; 25:250-254. [PMID: 37914915 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-023-00886-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Diseases of the gallbladder can be increasingly managed through endoscopic interventions, either serving as an alternative to or obviating the need for cholecystectomy. In this review, we aim to review the most recent data on endoscopic management of the most common gallbladder diseases. RECENT FINDINGS The development of lumen-opposing metal stents (LAMS) marked a major shift in gallbladder management, with transmural techniques now well studied for management of cholecystitis. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is also a well-developed technique for gallbladder imaging, comparable or superior to transabdominal ultrasound. Novel techniques with LAMS for gallbladder lesion/polyp resection and treatment of non-cholecystitis gallbladder diseases mark important milestones in gallbladder preservation and increasingly less invasive management of diseases of the gallbladder. There are multiple interventional endoscopic techniques that can be used to manage common gallbladder diseases including cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, gallbladder lesions/polyps, and gallbladder cancer. Ongoing development of novel therapeutic techniques holds promise for additional minimally invasive techniques in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua L Hudson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Koutlas NJ, Pawa S, Russell G, Pawa R. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage: Beyond Cholecystitis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13111933. [PMID: 37296785 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is an alternative to surgery for acute cholecystitis (AC) in poor operative candidates. However, the role of EUS-GBD in non-cholecystitis (NC) indications has not been well studied. We compared the clinical outcomes of EUS-GBD for AC and NC indications. Consecutive patients undergoing EUS-GBD for all indications at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-one patients underwent EUS-GBD during the study period. Thirty-nine (76%) patients had AC while 12 (24%) had NC indications. NC indications included malignant biliary obstruction (n = 8), symptomatic cholelithiasis (n = 1), gallstone pancreatitis (n = 1), choledocholithiasis (n = 1), and Mirizzi's syndrome (n = 1). Technical success was noted in 92% (36/39) for AC and 92% (11/12) for NC (p > 0.99). The clinical success rate was 94% and 100%, respectively (p > 0.99). There were four adverse events in the AC group and 3 in the NC group (p = 0.33). Procedure duration (median 43 vs. 45 min, p = 0.37), post-procedure length of stay (median 3 vs. 3 days, p = 0.97), and total gallbladder-related procedures (median 2 vs. 2, p = 0.59) were similar. EUS-GBD for NC indications is similarly safe and effective as EUS-GBD in AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J Koutlas
- Department of Medicine, Section on Gastroenterology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Swati Pawa
- Department of Medicine, Section on Gastroenterology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Greg Russell
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Rishi Pawa
- Department of Medicine, Section on Gastroenterology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang K, Ge N, Guo J, Wang S, Sun S. Ex vivo comparison of electrocautery-enhanced delivery of lumen-apposing metal stents matching electrosurgical workstations during EUS-guided gallbladder drainage. Endosc Ultrasound 2022; 11:377-382. [PMID: 36255025 PMCID: PMC9688136 DOI: 10.4103/eus-d-21-00240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has become one of the recommended treatments for patients with high-risk acute cholecystitis. However, the gallbladder reportedly collapsed due to bile leakage, which was a disadvantage that affects the surgical success rate. Different electrocautery-enhanced delivery of the lumen-apposing metal stents (ECE-LAMSs) using suitable power levels in electrosurgical workstations can increase the surgical success rate and reduce trauma. Therefore, we proposed the use of the ECE-LAMSs and electrosurgical workstations for the first time through ex vivo experiments to adjust the different power levels and select the most suitable electrosurgical power for each ECE-LAMS type. Methods We compared three types of ECE-LAMS (9Fr, 10.5Fr, and 10.8Fr) with three types of electrosurgical workstations during EUS-GBD. GBD was simulated ex vivo under the guidance of an ultrasound endoscope. We performed various power tests to elucidate the ideal electric power for different ECE-LAMS combined with the different types of electrosurgical workstations. Results For the 10.8Fr ECE-LAMS matched with the Martin, Erbe, and Olympus electrosurgical workstations, the ideal power levels were 200 W, 200 W, and 250W. For the 10.5Fr and 9Fr ECE-LAMS matched with the Martin, Erbe, and Olympus electrosurgical workstations, the ideal power levels were 150 W, 200 W, and 200 W. Conclusion During the operations, due to low-power levels in the electrosurgical workstations increased the number of cuts, the EUS images were obviously unclear, which affected the success rates of the operations. We suggested different power levels for the different types of LAMS and their matching electrosurgical workstations, which can increase the surgical success rates and reduce surgical injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Nan Ge
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Jintao Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Sheng Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Siyu Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China,Address for correspondence Dr. Siyu Sun, Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopic Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Sanhao Street 36, Shenyang 110 004, Liaoning Province, China. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|