A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravenous versus Oral Cyclophosphamide in Steroid-resistant Nephrotic Syndrome in Children

Interventions for idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

Nephrotic syndrome is a condition in which the glomeruli of the kidney leak large amounts of protein from the blood into the urine. Most children who present with their first episode of nephrotic syndrome achieve remission with corticosteroids. Children who fail to respond to corticosteroids in the first episode of nephrotic syndrome (initial resistance) or develop resistance after one or more responses to corticosteroids (delayed resistance) may be treated with immunosuppressive agents, including calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporin or tacrolimus), and with non-immunosuppressive agents, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. However, response to these agents is limited, so newer agents, including anti-CD20 antibodies (rituximab, ofatumumab) and dual endothelin-angiotensin receptor antagonists (sparsentan), are being assessed for efficacy and safety. This is an update of a review first published in 2004 and updated in 2006, 2010, 2016 and 2019.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of different interventions used in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, who do not achieve remission following four weeks or more of daily corticosteroid therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Kidney and Transplant (CKT) Information Specialist searched the CKT Register of Studies to 28 January 2025 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared different immunosuppressive or non-immunosuppressive agents with placebo, prednisone or another agent given orally or parenterally in children aged three months to 18 years with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). We included studies that enrolled children and adults, in which paediatric data could not be separated from adult data.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the search results, determined study eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted study data. We expressed dichotomous outcomes as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and continuous outcomes as mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. We used a random-effects model to pool data, and GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. The main outcomes of interest were treatment response (complete, partial, or complete or partial remission), kidney failure and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 29 studies (1248 evaluated children). Sixteen studies were at low risk of bias for sequence generation and allocation concealment. Seven and 21 studies were at low risk of performance and detection bias, respectively. Sixteen, 15 and 15 studies were at low risk of attrition bias, reporting bias and other bias, respectively. Compared with placebo, corticosteroid or no treatment, cyclosporin may increase the number who achieve complete remission (RR 3.50, 95% CI 1.09 to 11.20; 4 studies, 74 children) or complete or partial remission (RR 3.15, 95% CI 1.04 to 9.57; 4 studies, 74 children) by two to six months (low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether cyclosporin reduces the likelihood of kidney failure or increases the likelihood of worsening hypertension or infection (very low-certainty evidence). Compared with intravenous cyclophosphamide, calcineurin inhibitors may increase the number with complete remission (RR 3.43, 95% CI 1.84 to 6.41; 2 studies, 156 children) and complete or partial remission (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.13; 2 studies, 156 children) at three to six months (low-certainty evidence), and probably reduces the number with treatment failure (no response, serious infection, persistently elevated creatinine) and medications ceased due to adverse events (moderate-certainty evidence), with little or no increase in serious infections (moderate-certainty evidence). Kidney failure was not reported. Tacrolimus may make little or no difference to the number who achieve complete, or complete or partial remission at six and 12 months compared with cyclosporin, but may reduce the number who relapse during treatment (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.90; 1 study, 34 children) or the number with worsening hypertension (low-certainty evidence). Hypertrichosis and gingival hyperplasia probably increased with cyclosporin. Kidney failure was not reported. Compared with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and dexamethasone, cyclosporin probably makes little or no difference to complete, partial, or complete or partial remission (moderate-certainty evidence), and may make little or no difference to kidney failure, serious infection requiring hospitalisation or hypertension (low-certainty evidence). Among children who have achieved complete remission, tacrolimus compared with MMF may increase the number who maintain complete, partial, or complete or partial response for 12 months, but may make little or no difference to serious adverse events and serious infection (low-certainty evidence). Oral cyclophosphamide plus prednisone compared with prednisone alone may make little or no difference to the number who achieve complete remission (low-certainty evidence) and has uncertain effects on adverse events. Kidney failure was not reported. Compared with oral cyclophosphamide plus intravenous dexamethasone, intravenous cyclophosphamide may make little or no difference to complete, partial, or complete or partial remission at six months. There may be little or no difference in bacterial infections; however, hypertension may decrease (all low-certainty evidence). Kidney failure was not reported. It is uncertain whether rituximab/cyclosporin/prednisolone compared with cyclosporin/prednisolone increases the likelihood of remission or reduces adverse events because the certainty of the evidence is very low. Kidney failure was not reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Calcineurin inhibitors may increase the likelihood of complete or partial remission compared with placebo/no treatment or cyclophosphamide. For other regimens, it remains unclear whether the interventions alter outcomes because the certainty of the evidence is low. Further adequately powered, well-designed RCTs are needed to evaluate other regimens for children with idiopathic SRNS. Since SRNS represents a spectrum of diseases, future studies should enrol children from better-defined groups of people with SRNS.

IPNA clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome

Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome newly affects 1-3 per 100,000 children per year. Approximately 85% of cases show complete remission of proteinuria following glucocorticoid treatment. Patients who do not achieve complete remission within 4-6 weeks of glucocorticoid treatment have steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). In 10-30% of steroid-resistant patients, mutations in podocyte-associated genes can be detected, whereas an undefined circulating factor of immune origin is assumed in the remaining ones. Diagnosis and management of SRNS is a great challenge due to its heterogeneous etiology, frequent lack of remission by further immunosuppressive treatment, and severe complications including the development of end-stage kidney disease and recurrence after renal transplantation. A team of experts including pediatric nephrologists and renal geneticists from the International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA), a renal pathologist, and an adult nephrologist have now developed comprehensive clinical practice recommendations on the diagnosis and management of SRNS in children. The team performed a systematic literature review on 9 clinically relevant PICO (Patient or Population covered, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions, formulated recommendations and formally graded them at a consensus meeting, with input from patient representatives and a dietician acting as external advisors and a voting panel of pediatric nephrologists. Research recommendations are also given.

Added value recyclability of glass fiber waste as photo-oxidation catalyst for toxic cytostatic micropollutants

There is an increased interest in recycling valuable waste materials for usage in procedures with high added values. Silica microparticles are involved in the processes of catalysis, separation, immobilization of complexants, biologically active compounds, and different nanospecies, responding to restrictive requirements for selectivity of various chemical and biochemical processes. This paper presents the surface modification of accessible and dimensionally controlled recycled silica microfiber with titanium dioxide. Strong base species in organic solvents: methoxide, ethoxide, propoxide, and potassium butoxide in corresponding alcohol, activated the glass microfibres with 12-13 µm diameter. In the photo-oxidation process of a toxic micro-pollutant, cyclophosphamide, the new composite material successfully proved photocatalytic effectiveness. The present work fulfills simultaneously two specific objectives related to the efforts directed towards a sustainable environment and circular economy: recycling of optical glass microfibers resulted as waste from the industry, and their usage for the photo-oxidation of highly toxic emerging micro-pollutants.

Interventions for idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in children

BACKGROUND

The majority of children who present with their first episode of nephrotic syndrome achieve remission with corticosteroid therapy. Children who fail to respond to corticosteroids in the first episode of nephrotic syndrome (initial resistance) or develop resistance after one or more responses to corticosteroids (delayed resistance) may be treated with immunosuppressive agents including calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) (cyclosporin or tacrolimus) and with non-immunosuppressive agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). However, response to these agents is limited so newer agents are being assessed for efficacy. This is an update of a review first published in 2004 and updated in 2006, 2010 and 2016.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of different interventions used in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, who do not achieve remission following four weeks or more of daily corticosteroid therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies to 17 September 2019 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs were included if they compared different immunosuppressive agents or non-immunosuppressive agents with placebo, prednisone or other agent given orally or parenterally in children aged three months to 18 years with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). Studies, which enrolled children and adults but in which paediatric data could not be separated from adult data, were also included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently searched the literature, determined study eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. For dichotomous outcomes, results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). For continuous outcomes, results were expressed as mean difference (MD) and 95% CI. Data were pooled using the random effects model. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-five studies (1063 participants) were included. Fourteen studies were at low risk of bias for sequence generation and allocation concealment. Five and 19 studies were at low risk of performance and detection bias. Fourteen, 14 and 13 studies were at low risk of attrition bias, reporting bias and other bias respectively. Cyclosporin compared with placebo or no treatment may increase the number of participants who achieve complete remission (4 studies, 74 participants: RR 3.50, 95% CI 1.09 to 11.20) or complete or partial remission (4 studies, 74 children: RR 3.15, 95% CI 1.04 to 9.57) by 6 months (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether cyclosporin increases the likelihood of worsening hypertension or reduces the likelihood of end-stage kidney disease (very low certainty evidence). CNI compared with IV cyclophosphamide (CPA) may increase the number of participants with complete or partial remission at 3 to 6 months (2 studies, 156 children: RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.13) (low certainty evidence) and probably reduces the number with treatment failure (non response, serious infection, persistently elevated creatinine (1 study, 124 participants: RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.58) (moderate certainty evidence) with little or no increase in serious infections (1 study, 131 participants: RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.56) (moderate certainty evidence). Tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin may make little or no difference to the number who achieve complete or partial remission (2 studies, 58 participants: RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.25) (low certainty evidence) or in the number with worsening hypertension (2 studies, 58 participants: RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.15) (low certainty evidence). Cyclosporin compared with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and dexamethasone probably makes little or no difference to the number who achieve complete or partial remission (1 study, 138 participants: RR 2.14, 95% CI 0.87 to 5.24) (moderate certainty evidence) and makes little or no difference to the number dying (1 study, 138 participants: RR 2.14, 95% CI 0.87 to 5.24) or with 50% reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (1 study, 138 participants: RR 2.29, 95% CI 0.46 to 11.41) (low certainty evidence). Among children, who have achieved complete remission, tacrolimus compared with MMF may increase the number of children who maintain complete or partial response for 12 months (1 study, 60 children: RR 2.01, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.07) (low certainty evidence). Oral CPA with prednisone compared with prednisone alone may make little or no difference to the number who achieve complete remission (2 studies, 84 children: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.87) (low certainty evidence). IV CPA compared with oral CPA (2 studies, 61 children: RR 1.58, 95% CI 0.65 to 3.85) and IV compared with oral CPA plus IV dexamethasone (1 study, 49 children: RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.96) may make little or no difference to the number who achieve complete remission (low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether rituximab and cyclosporin compared with cyclosporin increases the likelihood of remission because the certainty of the evidence is very low. It is uncertain whether adalimumab or galactose compared with conservative therapy increases the likelihood of remission because the certainty of the evidence is very low. Two studies reported that ACEi may reduce proteinuria in children with SRNS. One study reported that the dual angiotensin II and endothelin Type A receptor antagonist, sparsentan, may reduce proteinuria more effectively than the angiotensin receptor blocker, irbesartan.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

To date RCTs have demonstrated that CNIs may increase the likelihood of complete or partial remission compared with placebo/no treatment or CPA. For other regimens assessed, it remains uncertain whether the interventions alter outcomes because the certainty of the evidence is low. Further adequately powered, well designed RCTs are needed to evaluate other regimens for children with idiopathic SRNS. Since SRNS represents a spectrum of diseases, future studies should enrol children from better defined groups of patients with SRNS.