Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Renal Disorders

Effect of Preoperative Therapeutic Plasma Exchange With Albumin Replacement Before Kidney Transplant on Intraoperative Coagulation Measured By the Thrombelastograph (TEGR 6s): A Case Report

Anesthesiologists should be aware of the coagulation implications of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) with albumin replacement for desensitization of kidney transplant (KT) recipients. We describe a case where the final preoperative TPE was performed with albumin. A TEGR 6s demonstrated defects in fibrinogen component to clot strength. With surgical oozing noted and the fibrinogen defect, cryoprecipitate was administered. Thereafter, fibrinogen contribution to clot strength normalized, coinciding with clinical hemostasis. With the increased use of TPE to reduce antibodies in KT recipients, visco-elastic testing may assist in the identification of coagulation defects when plasma is not used as replacement fluid.

Efficacy and safety of plasma diafiltration: Review of case reports and case series

Plasma diafiltration (PDF), a blood purification procedure that combines dialysis with plasma filtration by a selective membrane, has been used to treat acute liver failure, sepsis, and other acute conditions. We reviewed 14 eligible case reports and case series that examined PDF in 357 patients to assess its efficacy and safety. Fourteen diseases may be indications for PDF. The primary indication in the included studies was acute liver failure without obvious inducement or cause not mentioned. Eighty-three patients reached the primary endpoint (31 deaths, 52 recoveries) and the efficacy was 62.7%. There were large changes in 16 toxins or clinical markers after PDF, including total bilirubin, IL-18, IL-6. In conclusion, PDF appears to be an effective treatment for clearance of bilirubin and other inflammatory mediators in patients with acute liver injury or a disease characterized by a systemic inflammatory state. Randomized controlled trials are needed to compare PDF with other blood purification methods, such as plasma exchange and the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System™.

Polymer nanotherapeutics to correct autoimmunity

The immune system maintains homeostasis and protects the body from pathogens, mutated cells, and other harmful substances. When immune homeostasis is disrupted, excessive autoimmunity will lead to diseases. To inhibit the unexpected immune responses and reduce the impact of treatment on immunoprotective functions, polymer nanotherapeutics, such as nanomedicines, nanovaccines, and nanodecoys, were developed as part of an advanced strategy for precise immunomodulation. Nanomedicines transport cytotoxic drugs to target sites to reduce the occurrence of side effects and increase the stability and bioactivity of various immunomodulating agents, especially nucleic acids and cytokines. In addition, polymer nanomaterials carrying autoantigens used as nanovaccines can induce antigen-specific immune tolerance without interfering with protective immune responses. The precise immunomodulatory function of nanovaccines has broad prospects for the treatment of immune related-diseases. Besides, nanodecoys, which are designed to protect the body from various pathogenic substances by intravenous administration, are a simple and relatively noninvasive treatment. Herein, we have discussed and predicted the application of polymer nanotherapeutics in the correction of autoimmunity, including treating autoimmune diseases, controlling hypersensitivity, and avoiding transplant rejection.

Management of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) post renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

One of the common GN causing ESKD is focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Recurrence of FSGS post-transplantation can lead to graft loss. Data on management either prophylactically or once recurrence occurs are limited. This review article aims to assess the effective management of patients with FSGS recurrence post-transplantation, looking mainly at recurrence post prophylactic treatment and remission in case of treatment post recurrence.

METHODS

Twenty-three studies were included using the search MeSH terms "FSGS" "recurrence" "adults" "transplantation" "treatment". Search engines used were Pubmed, clinical key, Scopus and Cochrane library. Inclusion criteria were articles covered adult patients with recurrent FSGS post renal transplantation, treatment with rituximab and plasmapheresis, and articles published from 2000 tt2021. Excluded articles were paediatric population, studies with no reported outcomes of the treatment of FSGS, and Patients who received stem cell transplantation or galactose therapy.

RESULTS

Prophylactic PP did not show a reduction in recurrence of FSGS in 2/3 studies. Prophylactic rituximab was shown to reduce recurrence of FSGS in one-study and case reports. Treatment of recurrent FSGS with PP showed responses ranging from 41% to 100%. Only one study did not show improvement with PP use as treatment having a 27% remission. Treatment with rituximab showed variable results, with reports showing remission ranging from 57% to 100%. Whereas other reports showing no response at all. PP prescription reporting was variable. One study suggested intensified PP regimen while in most other studies PP was guided by the response reflected by the reduction of proteinuria.

DISCUSSION

Reviewing the treatment of recurrent FSGS is crucial, as there no consensus on treating FSGS as the disease is not very common in the adult population. The evidence of different modalities is based on small cohort studies. This paper supports the use of PP and RTX as treatment of recurrent FSGS.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, PP and RTX are the main modalities to treat recurrent FSGS with varying response rates. Prophylactic PP does not play a role in preventing recurrent FSGS. Prophylactic rituximab might play a role in preventing FSGS post-transplantation. PP and RTX, when used as a treatment, show variable response rates. Larger RCTs are needed to have a strong level of evidence to base our clinical management on.

Immunosuppression in Glomerular Diseases: Implications for SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines and COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Glomerular diseases (GD) are chronic conditions that often involve immune dysfunction and require immunosuppressive therapy (IST) to control underlying pathogenesis. Unfortunately, such diseases appear to heighten risks of severe outcomes in COVID-19 and predispose to other infections that may be life-threatening. Thus, averting preventable infections is imperative in GD patients.

SUMMARY

The advent of vaccines demonstrated to be safe and efficacious against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has favorably impacted the COVID-19 pandemic epidemiology. However, patients on ISTs were excluded from initial vaccine clinical trials. Thus, only limited and incomplete data are available currently regarding the potential impact of immunosuppression on immune response to or efficacy of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. However, new insights are emerging from SARS-CoV-2 vaccine studies, and impacts of ISTs on conventional vaccines are useful to consider. Mechanisms of immunosuppressive agents commonly used in the treatment of GD are reviewed with respect to implications for immune responses induced by SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. ISTs discussed include corticosteroids; alkylating agents; antimetabolites; calcineurin or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors; CD38+, CD20+, or CD19+ cell depletion; and complement protein C5 inhibition.

KEY MESSAGES

Many immunosuppressive therapies may potentially attenuate or impair protective immunity of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. However, as vaccines currently in use employ mRNA or nonreplicative viral vectors, they appear to be safe in patients on immunosuppression, further favoring vaccination. Moreover, predominant SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are likely to afford at least partial protective immunity through one or more immune mechanisms even in patients on IST. Guidelines and emerging strategies are also considered to optimize vaccine protection from COVID-19.

The Potential Use of Vitamin C to Prevent Kidney Injury in Patients with COVID-19

The newly found SARS-CoV-2 has led to the pandemic of COVID-19, which has caused respiratory distress syndrome and even death worldwide. This has become a global public health crisis. Unfortunately, elders and subjects with comorbidities have high mortality rates. One main feature of COVID-19 is the cytokine storm, which can cause damage in cells and tissues including the kidneys. Here, we reviewed the current literature on renal impairments in patients with COVID-19 and analyzed the possible etiology and mechanisms. In addition, we investigated the potential use of vitamin C for the prevention of renal injury in those patients. It appears that vitamin C could be helpful to improve the outcomes of patients with COVID-19. Lastly, we discussed the possible protective effects of vitamin C on renal functions in COVID-19 patients with existing kidney conditions.