1
|
Steinberg FT, Simon M, Wawer-Matos Reimer PA, Rokohl AC, Heindl LM. [New systemic treatment approaches for conjunctival melanoma]. DIE OPHTHALMOLOGIE 2025; 122:349-356. [PMID: 40067450 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-025-02207-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2024] [Revised: 12/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2025] [Indexed: 05/08/2025]
Abstract
Conjunctival melanoma is a rare disease that nevertheless has a high tumor-associated mortality rate. A resection in sano with adjuvant local treatment currently represents the therapeutic gold standard and systemic treatment is used for metastasized conjunctival melanoma and/or very advanced nonresectable local findings. New knowledge on molecular changes in conjunctival melanoma shows a clear similarity to those of cutaneous melanoma. Therefore, many findings on new systemic forms of treatment for cutaneous melanoma can be transferred to conjunctival melanoma. In the clinical application BRAF/MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors are already in use and good response rates have been shown in small retrospective studies and case reports. Due to the rarity of conjunctival melanoma, there are no larger prospective studies comparing different systemic therapeutic agents. In a nonrandomized retrospective comparison, a better overall survival was shown for a combination of BRAF/MEK inhibitors (progression-free 1‑year survival probability of 54.7%; overall survival of 29.1 months) compared to a combination of PD1/CTLA4 antibodies (progression-free 1‑year survival probability of 42%; overall survival of 18 months). The current recommendation is to perform genomic profiling for every conjunctival melanoma, particularly to investigate a BRAF mutation. If a BRAF mutation is present, BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment should preferably be initiated. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors can be used in the case of BRAF-negative mutation status or treatment failure with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Monotherapy with the CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab is not recommended due to its inferiority to PD1 antibodies. New knowledge in the genomic profiling of conjunctival melanoma could enable further targeted treatment options in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Simon
- Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | | | - Alexander C Rokohl
- Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Ludwig M Heindl
- Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Esmaeli B, Ogden T, Nichols M, Lu T, Matthew Debnam J, Dimitriou F, McQuade J, Glitza Oliva IC. Rate of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with conjunctival melanoma. Melanoma Res 2025; 35:130-144. [PMID: 39656585 PMCID: PMC11894759 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000001016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2024]
Abstract
Our primary objective was to estimate the overall response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with locally advanced, multiply recurrent, or metastatic conjunctival melanoma treated with ICIs. A retrospective review of all consecutive conjunctival melanoma patients who were treated with ICI between October 2017 and January 2024 was carried out. The study included 16 patients with a median age of 66 years. The indications for ICI were locally extensive conjunctival melanoma in the eye/orbital area without nodal or distant metastasis in 10 patients, local recurrence of conjunctival melanoma and simultaneous nodal or distant metastasis in four patients, and metastatic conjunctival melanoma without local recurrence in two patients. Five patients received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy with nivolumab or pembrolizumab; the other 11 received ipilimumab (CTLA-4 inhibitor) and nivolumab for several cycles and were then continued on nivolumab monotherapy ( n = 6) or not given additional ICI therapy ( n = 3). The number of cycles of ICI ranged from 2 to 25 (median, 13). Eight patients achieved a complete response. Six patients had progressive disease. The overall rate of objective response to ICI therapy was 63% (10 of 16), and for the subset of patients with local disease only, the objective response rate was 70% (7 of 10). In 14 patients (88%), orbital exenteration or additional extensive surgery was avoided; two patients had progression despite ICI and eventually needed an orbital exenteration. Future studies should aim to correlate biomarker data with response to ICI therapy in patients with conjunctival melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bita Esmaeli
- Orbital Oncology & Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tyler Ogden
- Orbital Oncology & Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Matthew Nichols
- Orbital Oncology & Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Tracy Lu
- Orbital Oncology & Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - J. Matthew Debnam
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Florentia Dimitriou
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jennifer McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Isabella C. Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li WJ, Najdawi W, Badla O, Galor A, Karp CL. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Ocular Surface Cancers: A Review. Semin Ophthalmol 2025:1-11. [PMID: 39923258 DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2025.2458658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2024] [Revised: 01/01/2025] [Accepted: 01/22/2025] [Indexed: 02/11/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer therapy by targeting key immune pathways such as PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, and LAG-3 to enhance the immune system's ability to combat malignancies. Their use in treating ocular surface tumors is an emerging area of interest, particularly in conjunctival melanoma (CM) and ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN). Some studies have indicated the potential of ICI's in sebaceous gland carcinoma (SeC), conjunctival lymphoma, and Kaposi sarcoma. PURPOSE This review aims to evaluate the role of ICIs in treating ocular surface tumors, focusing on their mechanisms of action, clinical outcomes, and therapeutic potential. METHODS A literature review was conducted by searching Pubmed for studies published between January 2014 and October 2024. Studies included were original research, clinical trials, case reports and series, and reviews. RESULTS ICIs, including pembrolizumab and nivolumab, have shown promising results in CM, achieving tumor regression and disease stabilization in advanced and metastatic cases. ICIs have also demonstrated efficacy in OSSN, particularly in lesions with high tumor mutational burden, with responses ranging from partial to complete resolution. Although clinical data for SeC and conjunctival lymphoma remain limited to isolated reports, these studies suggest a role for ICIs in managing refractory or advanced disease. CONCLUSION ICIs hold transformative potential in improving outcomes for ocular surface malignancies, particularly in cases where conventional treatments fail or pose significant morbidity. Despite their promise, challenges persist, including variable response rates, immune-related adverse events, and the need for reliable predictive biomarkers. Comprehensive prospective studies are necessary to refine the application of ICIs, optimize treatment strategies, and expand therapeutic options for these challenging cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy J Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Wisam Najdawi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Omar Badla
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Anat Galor
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Miami Veterans Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Carol L Karp
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weiss ME, Perzia BM, Sinard JH, Tran TT, Maeng MM. Primary Treatment of Eyelid Conjunctival Melanoma with Immunotherapy: A Case Report. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2025; 41:e12-e15. [PMID: 39240220 DOI: 10.1097/iop.0000000000002776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
Conjunctival melanoma is a rare, life- and sight-threatening ocular malignancy sharing molecular features with cutaneous and mucosal melanoma. Despite current clinical approaches, high recurrence rates and frequent metastases pose significant challenges in management. Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as ipilimumab and nivolumab have revolutionized cutaneous melanoma treatment, but their efficacy in conjunctival melanoma remains largely unexplored. Herein, the authors present the case of metastatic palpebral conjunctival melanoma in a 59-year-old male successfully treated with a first-line combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab without adjuvant therapies or local surgeries. Local disease resolution was achieved after only 7 months of treatment, and the immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen was well-tolerated with limited systemic adverse effects and no ocular side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madison E Weiss
- School of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, U.S.A
| | - Brittany M Perzia
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine
| | - John H Sinard
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine
- Smilow Cancer Hospital, Yale New Haven Health
| | - Thuy T Tran
- Smilow Cancer Hospital, Yale New Haven Health
- Department of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A
| | - Michelle M Maeng
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine
- Smilow Cancer Hospital, Yale New Haven Health
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Butt K, Hussain R, Coupland SE, Krishna Y. Conjunctival Melanoma: A Clinical Review and Update. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3121. [PMID: 39335093 PMCID: PMC11429624 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2024] [Revised: 09/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Conjunctival melanoma (Co-M) is an aggressive, invasive eye and eyelid cancer. Its global incidence of ~1 in a million is increasing at a rate ratio of ~1.4, but this rises sharply in over 65-year-olds. Although rare, Co-M has a devastating impact on the lives of those who develop it. Co-M is often misdiagnosed or overlooked, leading to vision loss either from the destructive effects of the tumour or side effects of therapy, facial disfigurement from radical surgery, and death from metastases. Due to its rarity, there is limited evidence for diagnosis and management; hence, there is no standardised treatment and not all cases are referred to a specialised ocular oncology centre. Recent progress in cancer immunology and genetics have revolutionised the treatment of cutaneous melanomas, which share some similarities to Co-M. Importantly, a better understanding of Co-M and its precursor lesions is urgently needed to lead to the development of novel targeted and immunotherapies both for local tumour control and disseminated disease. This review aims to provide a comprehensive clinical overview of the current knowledge regarding Co-M, its epidemiology, pathogenesis, presentation, diagnosis and recent changes in the classification of its precursor lesions, management, and recent advances in novel biological therapies for personalised treatment of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karam Butt
- National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service, Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L7 8YE, UK; (K.B.); (S.E.C.)
| | - Rumana Hussain
- St Paul’s Eye Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L7 8YE, UK;
- Department of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Life Course and Medical Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK
| | - Sarah E. Coupland
- National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service, Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L7 8YE, UK; (K.B.); (S.E.C.)
- Department of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Life Course and Medical Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK
| | - Yamini Krishna
- National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service, Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L7 8YE, UK; (K.B.); (S.E.C.)
- Department of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Life Course and Medical Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sen M, Demirci H, Honavar SG. Targeted therapy in ophthalmic oncology: The current status. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2024; 13:100062. [PMID: 38642707 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
There have been rapid advancements in the field of ocular oncology for the diagnosis and management of intraocular, adnexal, and orbital tumors. Targeted therapy is in the forefront of medical research in all fields including ocular oncology. Targeted therapy include drugs that target specific genetic mutations, pathways or proteins involved in the development of cancer. In contrast to traditionally used chemotherapy, drugs used in targeted therapy are highly specific for tumor cells and preserve the function of normal cells. This review aims to familiarize ophthalmologists with the drugs that are currently approved or undergoing clinical trials for use in ocular oncology. Targeted therapy is particularly useful for locally advanced or metastatic tumors, including but not limited to eyelid and periocular basal cell carcinoma, periocular cutaneous and conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma, ocular adnexal lymphoma, conjunctival melanoma, and uveal melanoma. The results are promising with improved survival outcomes and better tolerability than chemotherapeutic drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mrittika Sen
- Ocular Oncology Service, Raghunath Netralaya, Mumbai, India
| | - Hakan Demirci
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Santosh G Honavar
- Ocular Oncology Service, Centre for Sight Eye Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Serbest Ceylanoglu K, Guneri Beser B, Singalavanija T, Juntipwong S, Worden FP, Demirci H. Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy for Advanced Malignant Conjunctival Tumors: Systematic Review. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 40:18-29. [PMID: 38241616 DOI: 10.1097/iop.0000000000002488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review the outcomes of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in advanced conjunctival tumors, including conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma, conjunctival melanoma, and conjunctival lymphoma. METHODS A Pubmed database systematic search was performed between January 1999 and December 2022. The literature search was limited to studies published in English. RESULTS This review included 142 patients with advanced malignant conjunctival tumors from 42 articles. In the conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma group, 2 cases of advanced conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma treated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors showed significant tumor size improvement after 7.5 months of follow-up. Among 7 cases treated with systemic immunotherapy, 5 cases (72%) had complete response (CR), 1 case (14%) showed partial response (PR), and 1 case (14%) had stable disease (SD) after 16 months. In the conjunctival melanoma group, among 18 cases treated with combined v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1/mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase inhibitors, 6 (33%) had CR, 5 (28%) had PR, 2 (11%) had SD, and 5 (28%) had progressive disease after 24.8 months of follow-up. Of 44 conjunctival melanoma cases treated with immunotherapy, 12 (28%) had CR, 9 (20%) had PR, 7(16%) had SD, and 16 (36%) had progressive disease after 14.2 months. Systemic Rituximab treatment for conjunctival lymphoma cases resulted in CR in 21 patients (63%), PR in 11 patients (33%), and SD in 1 patient (3%) after 20.5 months of follow-up. Intralesional Rituximab injections in 38 conjunctival lymphoma cases showed CR in 28 patients (75%), PR in 7 patients (19%), SD in 1 patient (2%), and progressive disease in 2 patients (4%) after 20.4 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Despite limited clinical case reports and short-term follow-ups, targeted therapy and immunotherapy have shown promising results for advanced malignant conjunctival tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kubra Serbest Ceylanoglu
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Ulucanlar Eye Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye
| | - Buse Guneri Beser
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A
| | - Tassapol Singalavanija
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A
- Department of Ophthalmology, Chulabhorn Hospital, HRH Princess Chulabhorn College of Medical Science, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sarinee Juntipwong
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A
| | - Francis Paul Worden
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Roger Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Hakan Demirci
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fan K, Waninger JJ, Yentz S, McLean S, Demirci H. Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Metastatic Conjunctival Melanoma. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 39:e152-e155. [PMID: 37207285 PMCID: PMC10523967 DOI: 10.1097/iop.0000000000002407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has transformed the treatment of advanced-stage cutaneous melanoma; however, most trials did not include patients with conjunctival melanoma. Herein the authors describe a patient with recurrent conjunctival melanoma who developed locally advanced, b-raf and v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1-negative melanoma in her nasal cavity and extensive, metabolically active, bilateral lymphadenopathy in her thorax. Her nasal mass measured 4.3 × 1.7 cm and was determined to be unresectable. She was treated with 4 cycles of combination ipilimumab and nivolumab therapy followed by maintenance nivolumab. She experienced a dramatic treatment response with a reduction in the size of her nasal mass to 3.0 × 1.1 cm and a complete resolution of her adenopathy. She then underwent complete surgical resection of her residual mass (approximately 75% of her original tumor size) and remains melanoma-free at 1 year of follow-up. Given the underlying genetic similarities of conjunctival melanoma to cutaneous melanoma, providers should consider the use of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with locally advanced or limited metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Fan
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jessica J. Waninger
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor Michigan
| | - Sarah Yentz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology Division, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Scott McLean
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Hakan Demirci
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chang E, Demirci H, Demirci FY. Genetic Aspects of Conjunctival Melanoma: A Review. Genes (Basel) 2023; 14:1668. [PMID: 37761808 PMCID: PMC10530751 DOI: 10.3390/genes14091668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Conjunctival melanoma (CM) is a rare but aggressive cancer. Over the past decade, molecular studies using rapidly advancing technologies have increasingly improved our understanding of CM genetics. CMs are mainly characterized by dysregulated MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways, driven by commonly mutated (BRAF, NRAS, NF1) or less commonly mutated (KIT, PTEN) genes. Another group of genes frequently mutated in CMs include TERT and ATRX, with known roles in telomere maintenance and chromatin remodeling/epigenetic regulation. Uveal melanoma-related genes (BAP1, SF3B1, GNAQ/11) can also be mutated in CMs, albeit infrequently. Additional CM-related mutated genes have increasingly been identified using more comprehensive genetic analyses, awaiting further confirmation in additional/larger studies. As a tumor arising in a partly sun-exposed mucosal tissue, CM exhibits a distinct genomic profile, including the frequent presence of an ultraviolet (UV) signature (and high mutational load) and also the common occurrence of large structural variations (distributed across the genome) in addition to specific gene mutations. The knowledge gained from CM genetic studies to date has led to new therapeutic avenues, including the use of targeted and/or immuno-therapies with promising outcomes in several cases. Accordingly, the implementation of tumor genetic testing into the routine clinical care of CM patients holds promise to further improve and personalize their treatments. Likewise, a growing knowledge of poor prognosis-associated genetic changes in CMs (NRAS, TERT, and uveal melanoma signature mutations and chromosome 10q deletions) may ultimately guide future strategies for prognostic testing to further improve clinical outcomes (by tailoring surveillance and considering prophylactic treatments in patients with high-risk primary tumors).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Chang
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA
| | - Hakan Demirci
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA
| | - F. Yesim Demirci
- Department of Human Genetics, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bas Z, Dockery PW, Lally SE, Shields JA, Shields CL. Conjunctival Melanoma in 430 Cases: Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Orbital Invasion on Tumor Recurrence, Metastasis, and Death. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 39:49-57. [PMID: 36598390 DOI: 10.1097/iop.0000000000002238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the clinical features at presentation and treatment outcomes of conjunctival melanoma by absence/presence of orbital invasion. METHODS A retrospective review of patients with conjunctival melanoma managed at a single tertiary referral center from April 18, 1974, to September 9, 2019. RESULTS Of 430 patients with conjunctival melanoma, 21 (5%) had orbital invasion at presentation. A comparison between the 2 groups (orbital invasion absent vs. present) revealed that the orbital invasion group had a higher frequency of prior eyelid incisional biopsy (5% vs. 24%, P = 0.006), greater tumor basal diameter (12.2 vs. 17.3, P = 0.009), greater tumor thickness (2.4 vs. 7.0, P < 0.001), more quadrants involved (1.8 vs. 2.5, P = 0.002), and more clock hours involved (4.4 vs. 5.8, P = 0.037). In addition, those with orbital invasion were more likely to undergo exenteration as primary treatment (1% vs. 24%, P < 0.001). Multivariate relative risk regression analysis revealed that variables predictive of orbital invasion included greater tumor thickness (P < 0.001) and greater involvement of the fornix (P = 0.031) and tarsus (P = 0.033). Outcomes revealed orbital invasion group with greater 5-year/10-year distant metastatic rate (16%/21% vs. 63%/63%, P = 0.005), and greater melanoma-related death rate (7%/13% vs. 38%/53%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Conjunctival melanoma with orbital invasion at presentation demonstrate larger, more extensive tumors involving the fornix or tarsus, and with greater rate of melanoma-related metastasis and death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeynep Bas
- Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nahon-Estève S, Bertolotto C, Picard-Gauci A, Gastaud L, Baillif S, Hofman P, Groulier A, Maschi C, Caujolle JP, Lassalle S, Martel A. Small but Challenging Conjunctival Melanoma: New Insights, Paradigms and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5691. [PMID: 34830847 PMCID: PMC8616295 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Although its incidence has increased over the last decades, conjunctival melanoma (CM) remains a rare but challenging periocular malignancy. While there is currently no recognized standard of care, "no-touch" surgical excision followed by adjuvant treatments is usually recommended. Despite its small size, managing CM is challenging for clinicians. The first challenge is the high risk of tumour local recurrence that occurs in about one third of the patients. The management of locally advanced CM (≥T2) or multiple recurrences may require mutilating surgeries such as orbital exenteration (OE). The second challenge is the metastatic spread of CM that occurs in about one quarter of patients, regardless of whether complete surgical excision is performed or not. This highlights the infiltrative and highly aggressive behaviour of CM. Recently, attention has been directed towards the use of eye-sparing strategies to avoid OE. Initially, wide conservative surgeries followed by customized brachytherapy or radiotherapy have appeared as viable strategies. Nowadays, new biological insights into CM have revealed similarities with cutaneous melanoma. These new findings have allowed clinicians to reconsider the management of locally advanced CM with "medical" eye-sparing treatment as well as the management of metastatic spread. The aim of this review was to summarize the current and future perspectives of treatment for CM based on recent biological findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sacha Nahon-Estève
- Ophthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (S.B.); (C.M.); (J.-P.C.); (A.M.)
- Department of Biology and Pathologies of Melanocytes, Team1, Equipe Labellisée Ligue 2020 and Equipe Labellisée ARC 2019, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire, INSERM, 06200 Nice, France;
| | - Corine Bertolotto
- Department of Biology and Pathologies of Melanocytes, Team1, Equipe Labellisée Ligue 2020 and Equipe Labellisée ARC 2019, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire, INSERM, 06200 Nice, France;
| | - Alexandra Picard-Gauci
- Dermatology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France;
| | - Lauris Gastaud
- Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, Oncology Department, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France;
| | - Stéphanie Baillif
- Ophthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (S.B.); (C.M.); (J.-P.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Paul Hofman
- FHU OncoAge, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Nice (IRCAN), Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (P.H.); (S.L.)
- Biobank BB-0033-00025, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Anaïs Groulier
- Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France;
| | - Célia Maschi
- Ophthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (S.B.); (C.M.); (J.-P.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Jean-Pierre Caujolle
- Ophthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (S.B.); (C.M.); (J.-P.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Sandra Lassalle
- FHU OncoAge, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Nice (IRCAN), Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (P.H.); (S.L.)
- Biobank BB-0033-00025, Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Arnaud Martel
- Ophthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (S.B.); (C.M.); (J.-P.C.); (A.M.)
- FHU OncoAge, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Nice (IRCAN), Université Côte d’Azur, 06000 Nice, France; (P.H.); (S.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Poppelen NM, van Ipenburg JA, van den Bosch Q, Vaarwater J, Brands T, Eussen B, Magielsen F, Dubbink HJ, Paridaens D, Brosens E, Naus N, de Klein A, Kiliç E, Verdijk RM. Molecular Genetics of Conjunctival Melanoma and Prognostic Value of TERT Promoter Mutation Analysis. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22115784. [PMID: 34071371 PMCID: PMC8198138 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22115784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was exploration of the genetic background of conjunctival melanoma (CM) and correlation with recurrent and metastatic disease. Twenty-eight CM from the Rotterdam Ocular Melanoma Study group were collected and DNA was isolated from the formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed using a panel covering GNAQ, GNA11, EIF1AX, BAP1, BRAF, NRAS, c-KIT, PTEN, SF3B1, and TERT genes. Recurrences and metastasis were present in eight (29%) and nine (32%) CM cases, respectively. TERT promoter mutations were most common (54%), but BRAF (46%), NRAS (21%), BAP1 (18%), PTEN (14%), c-KIT (7%), and SF3B1 (4%) mutations were also observed. No mutations in GNAQ, GNA11, and EIF1AX were found. None of the mutations was significantly associated with recurrent disease. Presence of a TERT promoter mutation was associated with metastatic disease (p-value = 0.008). Based on our molecular findings, CM comprises a separate entity within melanoma, although there are overlapping molecular features with uveal melanoma, such as the presence of BAP1 and SF3B1 mutations. This warrants careful interpretation of molecular data, in the light of clinical findings. About three quarter of CM contain drug-targetable mutations, and TERT promoter mutations are correlated to metastatic disease in CM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha M. van Poppelen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (N.M.v.P.); (J.V.); (T.B.); (B.E.); (D.P.); (N.N.); (E.K.)
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (F.M.); (E.B.); (A.d.K.)
| | - Jolique A. van Ipenburg
- Department of Pathology, Section Ophthalmic Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (J.A.v.I.); (Q.v.d.B.); (H.J.D.)
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Quincy van den Bosch
- Department of Pathology, Section Ophthalmic Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (J.A.v.I.); (Q.v.d.B.); (H.J.D.)
| | - Jolanda Vaarwater
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (N.M.v.P.); (J.V.); (T.B.); (B.E.); (D.P.); (N.N.); (E.K.)
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (F.M.); (E.B.); (A.d.K.)
| | - Tom Brands
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (N.M.v.P.); (J.V.); (T.B.); (B.E.); (D.P.); (N.N.); (E.K.)
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (F.M.); (E.B.); (A.d.K.)
| | - Bert Eussen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (N.M.v.P.); (J.V.); (T.B.); (B.E.); (D.P.); (N.N.); (E.K.)
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (F.M.); (E.B.); (A.d.K.)
| | - Frank Magielsen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (F.M.); (E.B.); (A.d.K.)
| | - Hendrikus J. Dubbink
- Department of Pathology, Section Ophthalmic Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (J.A.v.I.); (Q.v.d.B.); (H.J.D.)
| | - Dion Paridaens
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (N.M.v.P.); (J.V.); (T.B.); (B.E.); (D.P.); (N.N.); (E.K.)
- Department of Ocular Oncology, The Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Schiedamse Vest 180, 3011 BH Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erwin Brosens
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (F.M.); (E.B.); (A.d.K.)
| | - Nicole Naus
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (N.M.v.P.); (J.V.); (T.B.); (B.E.); (D.P.); (N.N.); (E.K.)
| | - Annelies de Klein
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (F.M.); (E.B.); (A.d.K.)
| | - Emine Kiliç
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (N.M.v.P.); (J.V.); (T.B.); (B.E.); (D.P.); (N.N.); (E.K.)
| | - Robert M. Verdijk
- Department of Pathology, Section Ophthalmic Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (J.A.v.I.); (Q.v.d.B.); (H.J.D.)
- Department of Ocular Oncology, The Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Schiedamse Vest 180, 3011 BH Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brouwer NJ, Verdijk RM, Heegaard S, Marinkovic M, Esmaeli B, Jager MJ. Conjunctival melanoma: New insights in tumour genetics and immunology, leading to new therapeutic options. Prog Retin Eye Res 2021; 86:100971. [PMID: 34015548 DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.100971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Recent developments in oncology have led to a better molecular and cellular understanding of cancer, and the introduction of novel therapies. Conjunctival melanoma (CoM) is a rare but potentially devastating disease. A better understanding of CoM, leading to the development of novel therapies, is urgently needed. CoM is characterized by mutations that have also been identified in cutaneous melanoma, e.g. in BRAF, NRAS and TERT. These mutations are distinct from the mutations found in uveal melanoma (UM), affecting genes such as GNAQ, GNA11, and BAP1. Targeted therapies that are successful in cutaneous melanoma may therefore be useful in CoM. A recent breakthrough in the treatment of patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma was the development of immunotherapy. While immunotherapy is currently sparsely effective in intraocular tumours such as UM, the similarities between CoM and cutaneous melanoma (including in their immunological tumour micro environment) provide hope for the application of immunotherapy in CoM, and preliminary clinical data are indeed emerging to support this use. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge regarding CoM, with a focus on the genetic and immunologic understanding. We elaborate on the distinct position of CoM in contrast to other types of melanoma, and explain how new insights in the pathophysiology of this disease guide the development of new, personalized, treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels J Brouwer
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Robert M Verdijk
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medica Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Steffen Heegaard
- Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Pathology, Eye Pathology Section, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Marina Marinkovic
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Bita Esmaeli
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Orbital Oncology and Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Martine J Jager
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zeng Y, Hu C, Shu L, Pan Y, Zhao L, Pu X, Wu F. Clinical treatment options for early-stage and advanced conjunctival melanoma. Surv Ophthalmol 2021; 66:461-470. [PMID: 32980421 DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Conjunctival melanoma (CM) is an ocular malignant tumor arising from the bulbar and palpebral conjunctiva and from the caruncle. The treatment of early-stage CM is wide local excision, followed by cryotherapy to the margins and adjuvant therapy postoperatively. Advanced CM has a poor prognosis, and there is no consensus on its management. With the development of precision medicine, the identification of genetic alterations assumes great importance. The genetic characteristics of CM, such as BRAF, NRAS, and NF1 mutations, may provide potential therapeutic targets. For locally advanced tumors and metastatic disease, targeted therapy such as BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors in vitro show therapeutic benefit. Some individual case reports indicate their potential effectiveness in advanced CM. In addition, immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as programmed cell death-1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 inhibitors, have been successfully used for advanced cutaneous melanoma and may be effective in CM. Limited clinical case reports found immune checkpoint inhibitors effective in advanced CM. More clinical studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Zeng
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Chunhong Hu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Long Shu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yue Pan
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Lishu Zhao
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Xingxiang Pu
- Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital/the affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Fang Wu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pagliara MM, Tagliaferri L, Savino G, Fionda B, D'Aviero A, Lanza A, Lancellotta V, Midena G, Gambacorta MA, Blasi MA. High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) for Conjunctival Melanoma with Orbital Extension. Ocul Oncol Pathol 2021; 7:199-205. [PMID: 34307333 DOI: 10.1159/000512344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate local control and functional and cosmetic outcomes of postoperative high-dose-rate interventional radiotherapy (HDR-IRT) in patients affected by conjunctival melanoma with orbit invasion. Methods A retrospective study was conducted in 2 patients affected by conjunctival melanoma infiltrating the orbit, treated with surgical excision and HDR-IRT. The treatment procedures consisted of surgical excision of the orbital infiltrating nodule followed, 1 month after surgery, by adjuvant HDR-IRT. A target dose of 34 Gy was delivered in 10 twice-a-day fractions over 5 consecutive days. Data analysis included local tumor control and metastatic rate, acute and late toxicity, functional and aesthetic results. Results In both patients, treatment was well tolerated, and there was no orbital recurrence at a median follow-up of 37-40 months. There was an excellent functional outcome, without no significant acute or late side effects. Conclusions HDR-IRT could be considered a promising, feasible, successful, and well-tolerated option for selected patients affected by ocular tumors with orbital invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Maria Pagliara
- UOC Oncologia Oculare, Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Invecchiamento, Neurologiche, Ortopediche e della Testa Collo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gustavo Savino
- UOC Oncologia Oculare, Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Invecchiamento, Neurologiche, Ortopediche e della Testa Collo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Fionda
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea D'Aviero
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Lanza
- Ocular Unit, Ospedale Teresa Masselli, Foggia, Italy
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Midena
- UOC Oncologia Oculare, Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Invecchiamento, Neurologiche, Ortopediche e della Testa Collo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Blasi
- UOC Oncologia Oculare, Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Invecchiamento, Neurologiche, Ortopediche e della Testa Collo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hong BYB, Ford JR, Glitza IC, Torres Cabala CA, Tetzlaff M, Prieto VG, Parker R, Daniel C, Esmaeli B. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy as an Eye-Preserving Treatment for Locally Advanced Conjunctival Melanoma. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 37:e9-e13. [PMID: 32618825 PMCID: PMC7744319 DOI: 10.1097/iop.0000000000001700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The authors present 2 patients with locally advanced conjunctival melanoma for whom definitive surgery would mean an orbital exenteration with its associated inherent total visual loss and major facial disfigurement. Instead both patients were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. In 1 patient neoadjuvant pembrolizumab was used for approximately 12 months and the patient experienced near-total clinical resolution of the conjunctival melanoma. Multiple surgical biopsies of very small residual pigmentation showed pigmented macrophages and a complete pathologic response. In the second patient who presented with a locally advanced and metastatic conjunctival melanoma, significant shrinkage of conjunctival mass was observed after treatment with a combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab for 5 months, and this allowed preservation of the eye and ocular function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bennett Yau-Bun Hong
- Orbital Oncology and Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Joshua R Ford
- Orbital Oncology and Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Isabella C. Glitza
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Michael Tetzlaff
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Victor G. Prieto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard Parker
- Ophthalmic Plastic /Lid Oncology Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Claire Daniel
- Ophthalmic Plastic /Lid Oncology Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Bita Esmaeli
- Orbital Oncology and Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
High Expression of Programmed Death Ligand 1 and Programmed Death Ligand 2 in Ophthalmic Sebaceous Carcinoma: The Case for a Clinical Trial of Checkpoint Inhibitors. Am J Ophthalmol 2020; 220:128-139. [PMID: 32730911 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.07.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed death ligand 2 (PD-L2) in ocular adnexal sebaceous carcinoma (OASC), and to appraise these findings within the context of recent comparable studies. DESIGNS Retrospective case series. METHODS Twenty cases of primary OASC were immunostained for PD-L1, PD-L2 and CD8. PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression were graded with both the combined positive score (CPS) and the tumor proportion score (TPS). Both raw CPS and TPS were reported, as well as positivity with TPS and CPS ≥1. CD8 expression was graded on a 0-3 scale. Charts were reviewed for clinical correlations. The results of the current study were compared with results of similar recent investigations. RESULTS For the 20 cases, mean expression of PD-L1 with CPS was 29.7 (range 0-101.5) and with TPS was 12.2 (range 0-95.8); mean expression of PD-L2 with CPS was 7.9 (range 0-37.3) and with TPS was 1.9 (range 0-12.9). PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was detected in 95% of OASC, while PD-L1 TPS ≥1 was found in 75%. PD-L2 CPS ≥1 was present in 60%, while only 20% had PD-L2 TPS ≥1. Immune cells appeared to contribute to a substantial proportion of PD-L1 and PD-L2 positivity, and a conspicuous CD8-positive T-lymphocytic infiltrate was present in most tumors. Significant correlations were identified between tissue expression of PD-L1, PD-L2, and CD8. Tissues with greater levels of PD-L1 tended to express higher levels of PD-L2 and CD8. The degree of PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression was also associated with the area in millimeters squared of the immunostained tumor, suggesting that tumor sampling may influence interpretation of PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression in ocular adnexal tumors. CONCLUSIONS The current and preceding studies confirm that PD-L1 and PD-L2 are expressed in a high percentage of OASCs. These results support the premise that checkpoint inhibitor drugs hold considerable therapeutic promise for patients with OASC and stimulate the institution of clinical trials.
Collapse
|
18
|
Lassalle S, Nahon-Esteve S, Frouin E, Boulagnon-Rombi C, Josselin N, Cassoux N, Barnhill R, Scheller B, Baillif S, Hofman P. PD-L1 Expression in 65 Conjunctival Melanomas and Its Association with Clinical Outcome. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21239147. [PMID: 33266349 PMCID: PMC7731195 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21239147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Conjunctival melanoma (CM) iss a rare and aggressive tumour that is increasing in frequency. The prognostic value of PD-L1 expression, alone or in combination with CD8 and PD-1 expression and the BRAF and NRAS status, has not been determined in CM to date. We evaluated the expression of PD-L1, CD8, PD-1 in CM and investigated whether there was an association between the expression of these markers and the BRAF and NRAS molecular profile as well as some clinico-pathological criteria. A total of sixty-five CM were assessed for PD-L1, PD-1, and CD8 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and for BRAF and NRAS genomic alterations using molecular biology techniques and anti-BRAF and anti-NRAS antibodies. PD-L1 expression in tumour cells (TC) was very low or absent but detected in tumour-infiltrating immune cells (IC). A correlation was observed between the expression of PD-L1, CD8, and PD-1 in IC. No correlation between PD-L1 expression (in tumour and/or immune cells) and BRAF or NRAS mutations was observed. PD-L1 expression in IC correlated with a higher pTNM stage and PD-L1 expression in TC with worse disease-specific survival. PD-L1 expression is a potential prognostic biomarker that correlates with poor prognosis in CM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Lassalle
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, University Côte d’Azur, Pasteur 1 Hospital, 30 avenue de la voie Romaine CS 51069, 06001 Nice CEDEX 1, France;
- Institute of Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice (IRCAN), INSERM U1081/CNRS UMR7284, Medical School 28, Avenue de Valombrose, 06107 Nice CEDEX 2, France
- FHU OncoAge, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, University Côte d’Azur, Pasteur Hospital, 30 avenue de la voie Romaine CS 51069, 06001 Nice CEDEX 1, France
- Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB 0033-00025), Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Pasteur 1 Hospital, 30 avenue de la voie Romaine CS 51069, 06001 Nice CEDEX 1, France
| | - Sacha Nahon-Esteve
- Department of Ophthalmology, Pasteur 2 Hospital, 30 avenue de la voie Romaine CS 51069, 06001 Nice CEDEX 1, France; (S.N.-E.); (S.B.)
| | - Eric Frouin
- Laboratory of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, 2 rue de la Milétrie, CS 90577, 86021 Poitiers CEDEX, France;
| | - Camille Boulagnon-Rombi
- Laboratory of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, avenue du Général Koenig, 51092 Reims CEDEX, France;
| | - Nicolas Josselin
- Institut d’Histo-Pathologie, 55 rue Amiral du Chaffault, CS 50424, 44104 Nantes CEDEX 4, France;
| | - Nathalie Cassoux
- Department of Ophthalmology, Institut Curie, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75248 Paris CEDEX 5, France;
| | - Raymond Barnhill
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75248 Paris CEDEX 5, France;
- Faculty of Medicine University of Paris Descartes, 15 rue de l’École de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Boris Scheller
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, CLCC CAL, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice CEDEX 2, France;
| | - Stéphanie Baillif
- Department of Ophthalmology, Pasteur 2 Hospital, 30 avenue de la voie Romaine CS 51069, 06001 Nice CEDEX 1, France; (S.N.-E.); (S.B.)
| | - Paul Hofman
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, University Côte d’Azur, Pasteur 1 Hospital, 30 avenue de la voie Romaine CS 51069, 06001 Nice CEDEX 1, France;
- Institute of Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice (IRCAN), INSERM U1081/CNRS UMR7284, Medical School 28, Avenue de Valombrose, 06107 Nice CEDEX 2, France
- FHU OncoAge, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, University Côte d’Azur, Pasteur Hospital, 30 avenue de la voie Romaine CS 51069, 06001 Nice CEDEX 1, France
- Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB 0033-00025), Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Pasteur 1 Hospital, 30 avenue de la voie Romaine CS 51069, 06001 Nice CEDEX 1, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-4-92-03-88-55; Fax: +33-4-92-03-87-50
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gkiala A, Palioura S. Conjunctival Melanoma: Update on Genetics, Epigenetics and Targeted Molecular and Immune-Based Therapies. Clin Ophthalmol 2020; 14:3137-3152. [PMID: 33116365 PMCID: PMC7553763 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s271569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To present the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of conjunctival melanoma (CM) and review the existing literature on targeted molecular inhibitors as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors for the management of locally advanced and metastatic disease. Methods A comprehensive review of the literature was performed using the keywords "conjunctival melanoma", "immune checkpoint inhibitors", "BRAF inhibitors", "MEK inhibitors", "CTLA4 inhibitors", "PD1 inhibitors", "c-KIT mutations", "BRAF mutations", "NRAS mutations", "dabrafenib", "trametinib", "vemurafenib", "ipilimumab", "pembrolizumab", and "nivolumab". A total of 250 articles were reviewed and 120 were included in this report. Results Mutations of mediators in the MAP kinase pathway, such as RAS, BRAF, MEK and ERK, and mutations of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway play a major role in the pathogenesis of conjunctival melanoma. In addition, alterations of c-KIT, NF1, TERT, chemokine receptors as well as chromosomal copy number alterations and micro RNAs are thought to have a causative association with CM development. Targeted molecular inhibitors, such as BRAF and MEK inhibitors, are currently being implemented in the therapy of BRAF-mutated CM. Furthermore, immune checkpoint PD-1 and CTLA4 inhibitors with favorable clinical outcomes in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma have increased recurrence-free survival and reduced metastatic spread in CM cases. Conclusion The complex molecular mechanisms that contribute to the development of CM can be targeted both by molecular inhibitors of oncogenic pathways as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors in order to halt progression of the disease and increase survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Gkiala
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
McGrath LA, Palmer JM, Stark A, Glasson W, Warrier SK, Whitehead K, Hamilton H, Brooks K, Johansson PA, Hayward NK. Genomic analysis of adult case of ocular surface giant congenital melanocytic nevus and associated clinicopathological findings. Ophthalmic Genet 2020; 41:616-620. [PMID: 32814477 DOI: 10.1080/13816810.2020.1810281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Conjunctival nevi are the most common tumor of the ocular surface. There are some rare reports of so-called 'giant' conjunctival nevi. We report a case of a 47-year-old female with a cutaneous and ocular surface giant congenital melanocytic nevus and describe her clinical course. CASE DESCRIPTION This is a retrospective case report of a single patient. A 47-year-old female with a history of biopsy-proven periorbital congenital melanocytic nevus, with an associated giant conjunctival nevus presented for structural and functional rehabilitation. Serial surgeries were performed and excised tissue was sent for histopathological and genetic examination. The conjunctival nevus had a low tumor mutation burden, and of the 647 somatic mutations, only one occurred within a protein coding region, namely NRAS p.Gln61Arg. CONCLUSION This is the first reported adult case including genomic analysis of an ocular surface giant congenital melanocytic nevus. The case shows a possible association between periorbital congenital melanocytic nevi and giant conjunctival nevi, and underscores the possible role that targeted drug therapies may have in malignant transformation of these conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay A McGrath
- Queensland Ocular Oncology Service, Terrace Eye Centre , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Jane M Palmer
- Queensland Ocular Oncology Service, Terrace Eye Centre , Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Department of Oncogenomics , QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Andrew Stark
- Queensland Ocular Oncology Service, Terrace Eye Centre , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - William Glasson
- Queensland Ocular Oncology Service, Terrace Eye Centre , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sunil K Warrier
- Queensland Ocular Oncology Service, Terrace Eye Centre , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Kevin Whitehead
- Department of Histopathology, Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Hayley Hamilton
- Queensland Ocular Oncology Service, Terrace Eye Centre , Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Department of Oncogenomics , QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Kelly Brooks
- Department of Oncogenomics , QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Peter A Johansson
- Department of Oncogenomics , QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nicholas K Hayward
- Department of Oncogenomics , QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|