Triceps to biceps transfer for restoration of elbow flexion following upper brachial plexus injury

Intercostal nerve transfer in management of biceps and triceps co-contraction in brachial plexus birth palsy

OBJECTIVE

Brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP) is often caused by traction during birth. In some cases, reinnervation occurs during spontaneous recovery and it causes involuntary co-contraction between antagonistic muscles. When it comes up between the biceps and triceps muscles, smooth active motion of the elbow joint is impaired. We are presenting outcomes of intercostal nerve (ICN) to radial nerve transfer to minimize elbow motion abnormality due to co-contraction.

METHODS

We present five cases (two males and three females) of biceps and triceps co-contraction in BPBP patients treated from 2005 to 2018. The mean age at surgery was 9.36 years (range, 4.8-16.4 years). They were treated by ICNs transfer to motor branch of the radial nerve to the triceps muscle. Preoperative electromyography was done in all cases to confirm biceps and triceps co-contraction and to assess the contractile status of both muscles. A 10-s flexion extension test was done pre and postoperatively to assess the efficacy of our procedure.

RESULTS

The postop course was uneventful. No donor site morbidity or respiratory complications were recorded in any patient. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 83.9 months (range, 53.6-135.5 months). At the final follow-up, elbow flexion was M4 in the Medical Research Council (MRC) grading scale in all five patients and elbow extension was graded M4 or M4- in all five patients. There was significant increase in the 10 s flexion extension test results delineating the effectiveness of the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

ICNs transfer to motor branch of the radial nerve to the triceps muscle for management of biceps and triceps co-contraction in BPBP is a good option with minimal morbidity and good success rate.

Tendon transfer from a re-innervated triceps to the biceps for restoration of elbow flexion in total brachial plexus palsy

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of the tendon transfer from a reinnervated triceps to biceps in the context of total brachial plexus palsy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study. Patients had reinnervation of the triceps either by spontaneous recovery or by nerve transfer. Functional results were assessed by strength and range of motion. The level of patient satisfaction was measured on a scale from 0 to 10.

RESULTS

Six patients (6 transfers) were included. Two triceps had spontaneous reinnervation and the other four through neurotization of intercostal nerves. All patients recovered strength to M4 in flexion with an average secondary deficit of 10° (5°-15°). The mean level of satisfaction was measured at 7/10 (6-8).

CONCLUSIONS

This tendon transfer is a reliable and simple solution for supportive restoration of elbow flexion. Systematic reinnervation of active extension of the elbow should be proposed for the gain in function that it represents but also for the supportive therapeutic opportunity that it offers should nerve surgery for elbow flexion fail.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Triceps-to-Biceps Tendon Transfer for Restoration of Elbow Flexion in Brachial Plexus Injury

PURPOSE

Restoring elbow flexion is a reconstructive priority in patients with brachial plexus injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the results and assess factors contributing to outcomes of triceps-to-biceps tendon transfer in patients presenting with delayed or chronic upper brachial plexus injury.

METHODS

Patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries undergoing triceps-to-biceps tendon transfer at a single institution's multidisciplinary brachial plexus center between 2001 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The entire triceps tendon was transferred around the lateral aspect of the arm, secured to the radius with a tenodesis button, and reinforced with a side-to-side tendon transfer to the biceps tendon. Primary outcomes include the modified British Medical Research Council (mBMRC) elbow flexion strength and active elbow range of motion.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (eight men and four women; mean age, 45.2 years) were included. The mean follow-up was 10.4 (range, 5-34) months. Nine patients achieved mBMRC ≥3. Five patients achieved mBMRC 4. Average active elbow flexion was 119°, with average extension deficit of 11°. There were three patients with unsatisfactory results, achieving mBMRC 2 elbow flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

Triceps-to-biceps tendon transfer is an excellent tendon transfer option for restoring elbow flexion in certain patients with an adequately functioning triceps muscle, who present with a delayed or chronic brachial plexus injury. Although most patients achieved mBMRC ≥3 elbow flexion, there was an expected permanent loss of elbow active extension with a residual elbow flexion contracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Long Head of Triceps Tendon Transfer for Agenesis of Biceps and Brachialis: Two Cases

Congenital lack of elbow flexion results in significant disability and may be seen in conjunction with syndromes, plexopathies, neuromuscular disorders, or as an isolated muscular agenesis of elbow flexors. There are many tendon transfer options to address this issue, but there is a lack of data on the functional results in the pediatric population. In this series, we present 1 patient with isolated muscular agenesis of the biceps and brachialis musculotendinous units and another with this same muscular agenesis in the setting of arthrogryposis. They were treated with anterior ulnar nerve transposition and transfer of the long head of triceps tendon around 2 years of age resulting in functional elbow flexion in both patients.