Comparison between Two Scheimpflug Anterior Segment Analyzers

Optimization of biometry for best refractive outcome in cataract surgery

High-precision biometry and accurate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation have become essential components of cataract surgery. In clinical practice, IOL power calculation involves measuring parameters such as corneal power and axial length and then applying a power calculation formula. The importance of posterior corneal curvature in determining the true power of the cornea is increasingly being recognized, and newer investigative modalities that can estimate both the anterior and posterior corneal power are becoming the standard of care. Optical biometry, especially using swept-source biometers, with an accuracy of 0.01-0.02 mm, has become the state-of-the-art method in biometry. With the evolution of IOL formulas, the ultimate goal of achieving a given target refraction has also moved closer to accuracy. However, despite these technological efforts to standardize and calibrate methods of IOL power calculation, achieving a mean absolute error of zero for every patient undergoing cataract surgery may not be possible. This is due to inherent consistent bias and systematic errors in the measurement devices, IOL formulas, and the individual bias of the surgeon. Optimization and personalization of lens constants allow for the incorporation of these systematic errors as well as individual bias, thereby further improving IOL power prediction accuracy. Our review provides a comprehensive overview of parameters for accurate biometry, along with considerations to enhance IOL power prediction accuracy through optimization and personalization. We conducted a detailed search in PubMed and Google Scholar by using a combination of MeSH terms and specific keywords such as "ocular biometry," "IOL power calculations," "prediction accuracy of refractive outcome in cataract surgery," "effective lens position," "intraocular lens calculation formulas," and "optimization of A-constants" to find relevant literature. We identified and analyzed 121 relevant articles, and their findings were included.

On the Relationship between Corneal Biomechanics, Macrostructure, and Optical Properties

Optical properties of the cornea are responsible for correct vision; the ultrastructure allows optical transparency, and the biomechanical properties govern the shape, elasticity, or stiffness of the cornea, affecting ocular integrity and intraocular pressure. Therefore, the optical aberrations, corneal transparency, structure, and biomechanics play a fundamental role in the optical quality of human vision, ocular health, and refractive surgery outcomes. However, the inter-relationships of those properties are not yet reported at a macroscopic scale within the hierarchical structure of the cornea. This work explores the relationships between the biomechanics, structure, and optical properties (corneal aberrations and optical density) at a macro-structural level of the cornea through dual Placido–Scheimpflug imaging and air-puff tonometry systems in a healthy young adult population. Results showed correlation between optical transparency, corneal macrostructure, and biomechanics, whereas corneal aberrations and in particular spherical terms remained independent. A compensation mechanism for the spherical aberration is proposed through corneal shape and biomechanics.

Agreement of anterior segment measurements between four diagnostic imaging devices in myopic patients

PURPOSE

To compare the inter-device agreement of anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), corneal astigmatism (ΔK), and white-to-white (WTW) measurements.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study with 73 myopic patients (142 eyes). We extracted and compared anterior segment measurements (ACD, CCT, K1, K2, ΔK, and WTW) of four devices (OPD-Scan III, Pentacam HR, Lenstar LS 900, and Galilei G4), and performed pairwise agreement comparisons between them.

RESULTS

Agreement analyses revealed that the most agreement occurred: in Pentacam HR and Galilei G4 for ACD measurements, in Pentacam HR and Lenstar LS 900 for CCT measurements, in OPD-Scan III and Galilei G4 for WTW measurements, in OPD-Scan III and Pentacam HR for K1 and K2 measurements, and OPD-Scan III and Galilei G4 for ΔK measurements.

CONCLUSION

OPD-Scan III is interchangeable with both Galilei G4 and Lenstar LS 900 for WTW measurements. OPD-Scan III and the Pentacam-HR are interchangeable in K1, K2, and ΔK measurements. OPD-Scan III and Lenstar LS 900, and OPD-Scan III and Galilei G4 are interchangeable in K1 and ΔK measurements, respectively.

The effect of topical bimatoprost on corneal clarity in primary open-angle glaucoma: a longitudinal prospective assessment

PURPOSE

To study the effect of topical bimatoprost on the corneal optical density values using a dual Scheimpflug Placido analysis system.

METHODS

This longitudinal case-control study included 18 patients with newly diagnosed primary open-angle glaucoma who received topical bimatoprost as a first-line treatment and 20 healthy individuals (age and sex-matched controls). Corneal densitometry data were obtained using the dual Scheimpflug analyzer at pre-treatment and 1st, 6th, 12th, 18th months of post-treatment. Repeated measures of ANOVA and Pearson correlation tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences between pre-treatment and post-treatment 1st and 6th months corneal densitometry values (p < 0.001, p = 0.007, respectively). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the post-treatment 12th and 18th months (p > 0.05). Corneal densitometry values decreased during the 1st month. Intraocular pressure (IOP) differences were statistically significant between baseline and 1 month after treatment (P < 0.001), however not statistically significant between the 1st and 6th, 6th and 12th, 12th and 18th months after treatment (p > 0.05, for all). Corneal densitometry was not correlated with IOP (r = - 0.037, p = 0.44). In the control group, there was no statistically significant difference between baseline and post-baseline 18th-month corneal densitometry measurements (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Topical bimatoprost administration might result in a decrease in corneal densitometry measurement. It is of clinical importance that topical bimatoprost administration can affect corneal transparency and cause a possible alteration in corneal properties.

Comparison of Simulated and True Keratometry Measurements Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography and Dual Scheimpflug-Placido Imaging

Purpose

To compare simulated and total keratometry and corneal astigmatism values between the IOLMaster 700 and Galilei G4 devices.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients undergoing phacoemulsification by a single surgeon (RTP) from March through September 2020 and who underwent imaging with both the IOLMaster 700 and Galilei G4. Exclusion criteria were prior corneal surgery, keratectatic diseases and inability to obtain a reliable image during image acquisition. Mean, flat, and steep keratometry values as well as astigmatism magnitude were compared.

Results

A total of 200 eyes of 100 patients were included. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were moderate or high for all variables. Mean difference ± SD in SimK and TrueK between devices (G4-IOLM) was 0.05 ± 0.318 diopters and −1.1156 ± 0.438 diopters, respectively (p < 0.05 for both). The IOLM measured steeper TrueK value than the G4. For SimK, there was a statistically significant difference between devices only for mean keratometry (K), whereas for TrueK, there were significant differences in flat K, steep K, and mean K. Astigmatism analysis revealed a difference in mean (±SD) SimK of 0.07 (±0.57) D at 94 degrees and in mean TrueK of 0.04 (±0.85) D at 108 degrees.

Conclusion

Though there is overall good correlation between the IOLMaster 700 and Galilei G4 in SimK and astigmatism measurements, there is a significant difference in TrueK measurements, with the IOLM measuring steeper values by about 1.0 diopter as compared to the G4.

Corneal thickness evaluation in healthy eyes: Comparison between two different Scheimpflug devices

Purpose

To evaluate the correlation between corneal thickness (CT) measurements obtained with two Scheimpflug devices, Pentacam HR and Precisio, and to elaborate, if necessary, a regression formula which could make these results comparable.

Design

Retrospective, Comparative, Observational study.

Setting

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, “Scuola Medica Salernitana” University of Salerno, Italy

Methods

One hundred twenty four healthy eyes of 124 volunteers (65 males; range: 20–32 years; mean age of 24.8 ± 1.7) were included in this study. CT was measured using Pentacam HR and Precisio in three different points: the pupil center (PC), the corneal apex (CA) and the thinnest point (TP).

Results

CT obtained with both devices at the PC, at the CA and at the TP showed a good correlation (r = 0.97, r = 0.97, r = 0.97, respectively), but Pentacam HR measurements were significantly thicker than those provided by Precisio (p < 0.01). The differences between Pentacam HR and Precisio were 21.9 ± 8.8 μm at the PC, 21.9 ± 8.9 μm at the CA, 19.1 ± 9.0 μm at the TP. The calculated regression formulas were: y = 0.9558x + 2.3196 for the PC, y = 0.9519x + 4.5626 for the CA, y = 0.9364x + 15.436 for the TP, where x is the CT measured with Pentacam HR and y is the Precisio measurement.

Conclusions

The findings provided by this study highlight that Precisio measures thinner corneas compared to Pentacam HR. The identified regression formulas could be utilized to make interchangeable the results obtained with these two devices.

Galilei Corneal Tomography for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part II

Corneal topography is the most widely used technology for examining the anterior corneal surface. Scheimpflug imaging is a newer technique that allows for measurement of both the anterior and posterior corneal surface, which allows for three-dimensional reconstruction of the cornea. This is of particular interest and value in the field of cataract and refractive surgery. The Galilei camera is a commercially available dual Scheimpflug system that combines curvature data from Placido disc-based corneal topography with elevation data from Scheimpflug technology. The addition of Placido disc topography makes the Galilei unique from its more popular counterpart, the Pentacam, which was discussed in Part I. Compared to the Pentacam, and however, the Galilei analyzer is a newer system that has emerged as a valuable screening tool given its dual Scheimpflug capability. In the first article of this series, the authors summarized the refractive indices available on the Pentacam system with the purpose of identifying the best diagnostic parameters for keratoconus. Similarly, the purpose of this article is to summarize corneal surface indices available on the Galilei system and evaluate their use in screening of the refractive surgery candidate. Since post-operative keratectasia is still prevalent, this paper aims to identify the most clinically relevant indices that may be used in pre-operative evaluation.

Optimizing outcomes with toric intraocular lenses

Toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) are the procedure of choice to correct corneal astigmatism of 1 D or more in cases undergoing cataract surgery. Comprehensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE using “toric intraocular lenses,” “astigmatism,” and “cataract surgery” as keywords. The outcomes after toric IOL implantation are influenced by numerous factors, right from the preoperative case selection and investigations to accurate intraoperative alignment and postoperative care. Enhanced accuracy of keratometry estimation may be achieved by taking multiple measurements and employing at least two separate devices based on different principles. The importance of posterior corneal curvature is increasingly being recognized in various studies, and newer investigative modalities that account for both the anterior and posterior corneal power are becoming the standard of care. An ideal IOL power calculation formula should take into account the surgically induced astigmatism, the posterior corneal curvature as well as the effective lens position. Conventional manual marking has given way to image-guided systems and intraoperative aberrometry, which provide a mark-less IOL alignment and also aid in planning the incisions, capsulorhexis size, and optimal IOL centration. Postoperative toric IOL misalignment is the major factor responsible for suboptimal visual outcomes after toric IOL implantation. Realignment of the toric IOL is needed in 0.65%–3.3% cases, with more than 10° of rotation from the target axis. Newer toric IOLs have enhanced rotational stability and provide precise visual outcomes with minimal higher order aberrations.