Impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy before radical nephroureterectomy on intravesical recurrence in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC)

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to propose an update of the French guidelines from the national committee ccAFU on upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC).

METHODS

A systematic Medline search for epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment options and follow-up of UTUC was performed between 2022 and 2024 to evaluate available references and their levels of evidence.

RESULTS

UTUC is a rare malignancy with specific risk factors, including exposure to aristolochic acid and Lynch syndrome. Its diagnosis is based on the use of computed tomography urography and ureterorenoscopy with biopsies. A prognostic classification has been proposed to discriminate low- and high-risk lesions mainly on the basis of tumour grade (low/high) and imaging aspects (non-invasive/invasive). Tumour size (<2/≥2cm), focality (uni-/multifocal), and hydronephrosis (absent/present) are more relative risk factors. The standard of care for low-risk patients is currently conservative treatment involving ureterorenoscopy laser ablation, whereas radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is advised for those with high-risk disease. Adjuvant treatments after RNU include intravesical instillation of chemotherapy to decrease the risk of bladder recurrence and delivery of platinum-based chemotherapy in pT2-T4 and/or pN+ patients. First-line treatment for metastatic UTUC is based on the combination of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab. For unfit patients, platinum-based chemotherapy plus nivolumab followed by maintenance nivolumab or platinum-based chemotherapy followed by maintenance avelumab in those with at least stable disease can be proposed. The surveillance regimen and schedule depend on the disease stage.

CONCLUSION

These updated guidelines will contribute to improving the management of patients diagnosed with UTUC.

Diagnosing upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A review of the role of diagnostic ureteroscopy and novel developments over last two decades

Objective

The role of ureteroscopy in the diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma is yet to be fully determined. We aimed to provide an up to date evaluation of its role and the emerging technologies in the field.

Methods

A literature search of the last two decades (from 24th May, 2001 to 24th May, 2021) was carried out identifying 147 papers for potential inclusion within this narrative review.

Results

Diagnostic ureteroscopy is undeniably useful in its ability to visualise and biopsy indeterminate lesions, and to risk stratify malignant lesions that may be suitable for kidney sparing surgery. However, an increased risk of intravesical recurrence following nephroureterectomy when a prior diagnostic ureteroscopy has been performed, inadequate sampling at biopsy, complications from the procedure, and difficult ureteric access are all potential drawbacks. Furthermore, whilst generally an accurate diagnostic procedure, it risks missing carcinoma in-situ lesions. Despite this, evidence shows that routine use of ureteroscopy changes the management of patients in a large proportion of cases, preventing unnecessary surgery or facilitating kidney sparing surgery. The overall rate of complications is low, and improved biopsy techniques and the use of tissue biomarkers for improved staging and grading are encouraging. The risks of delays to definitive management and post-ureteroscopy intravesical recurrence do not seem to affect survival, and trials are in progress to determine whether intravesical therapy can mitigate the latter. Further promising techniques are being investigated to improve shortcomings, particularly in relation to improved diagnosis of carcinoma in situ and preoperative staging.

Conclusion

Ureteroscopy has a role in the diagnosis of upper tract malignancy, though whether it should be used routinely is yet to be determined.

Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Diagnosis and Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review

Diagnosis and risk stratification are cornerstones of therapeutic decisions in the management of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Diagnostic modalities provide data that can be integrated, to provide nomograms and stratification tools to predict survival and adverse outcomes. This study reviews cytology, ureterorenoscopy and the novel tools and techniques used with it (including photodynamic diagnosis, narrow-band imaging, optical coherence tomography, and confocal laser endomicroscopy), and biopsy. Imaging modalities and novel biomarkers are discussed in another article. Patient- and tumor-related prognostic factors, their association with survival indices, and their roles in different scores and predictive tools are discussed. Patient-related factors include age, sex, ethnicity, tobacco consumption, surgical delay, sarcopenia, nutritional status, and several blood-based markers. Tumor-related prognosticators comprise stage, grade, presentation, location, multifocality, size, lymphovascular invasion, surgical margins, lymph node status, mutational landscape, architecture, histologic variants, and tumor-stroma ratio. The accuracy and validation of pre-operative predictive tools, which incorporate various prognosticators to predict the risk of muscle-invasive or non-organ confined disease, and help to decide on the surgery type (radical nephroureterectomy, or kidney-sparing procedures) are also investigated. Post-operative nomograms, which help decide on adjuvant chemotherapy and plan follow-up are explored. Finally, a revision of the current stratification of UTUC patients is endorsed.

Impact of diagnostic ureteral catheterization on intravesical tumour recurrence following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

PURPOSE

To investigate whether even a minimally invasive diagnostic procedure for the upper tract such as ureteral catheterization (UCath) may substantially increase the risk of intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).

METHODS

The present, retrospective study enrolled 163 patients undergoing RNU for UTUC between 2010 and 2021 at two, tertiary care hospitals. The primary endpoint was the association between UCath and IVR-free survival (IVRFS). The secondary endpoints were the association of ureterorenoscopy (URS) and URS biopsy (URSBx) with IVRFS. Directed acyclic graph (DAG)-guided multivariable models were used to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of the 163 patients, 128 (79%), 88 (54%), and 67 (41%) received UCath, URS, and URSBx, respectively. URS was performed concurrently with UCath. During the follow-up period (median: 47 months), IVR developed in 62 patients (5-year IVRFS rate: 52%). A DAG included concurrent bladder cancer, tumour size, hydronephrosis, positive cytology, and multiple UTUCs as potential confounders of the association between UCath and IVR. Both DAG-guided and stepwise multivariable models revealed a significant association between UCath and IVR (hazard ratio: 17.8; P < 0.001). UCath was also associated with shorter IVRFS in a subset of 75 patients who had not received URS (P < 0.001). In contrast, URS and URSBx were not associated with IVR in patients who had received UCath and URS, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Any diagnostic manipulations of the upper urinary tract, even a minimally invasive procedure like UCath, could confer a risk of post-RNU IVR in UTUC patients.

Predictive factors of bladder tumor recurrence after radical treatment of upper urinary tract cancer

INTRODUCTION

The main problem after Radical Nephroureterectomy (RNU) for localized non-metastatic upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (NM-UUT-UC) is bladder recurrence.

AIM

To identify factors of bladder recurrence of localized NM-UUT-UC after radical treatment.

METHODS

It is an analytical and observational study that was conducted in the department of urology of La Rabta Hospital in Tunis. We collected the data of patients diagnosed with localized NM-UUT-UC who had RNU between 2005 and 2019.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 73 eligible patients was 68 years (±11). The sex ratio was 5/2. Macroscopic hematuria was the revealing clinical sign in 66% of patients, while low back pain was the most frequent sign in 88% of patients. The most frequent tumor stage was pT1 in 20 patients while 32% of them had a pT2-T3 stage. Bladder recurrence was reported in 22% of patients with a median time of nine months [4-27] and extremes of three and 69 months. Factors of bladder recurrence in the univariate analysis were smoking, tumor localization in the ureter and the extravesical excision of the intramural ureter and bladder cuff. On multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of bladder tumor recurrence was ureteral location (OR=3.65; CI95%=[1.02-13.1] ; p=0.047).

CONCLUSION

Tumor localization in the ureter was an independent predictor of bladder recurrence after radical treatment for localized NM-UUT-UC.

Assessment of association between lower ureteric excision technique and oncological outcomes for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: retrospective analysis from the Scottish Renal Cancer Consortium

PURPOSE

Nephroureterectomy(NU) remains the gold-standard surgical option for the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma(UTUC). Controversy exists regarding the optimal excision technique of the lower ureter. We sought to compare post-UTUC bladder tumour recurrence across the Scottish Renal Cancer Consortium(SRCC).

METHODS

Patients who underwent NU for UTUC across the SRCC 2012-2019 were identified. The impact of lower-end surgical technique along with T-stage, N-stage, tumour location and focality, positive surgical margin, pre-NU ureteroscopy, upper-end technique and adjuvant mitomycin C administration were assessed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression. The primary outcome was intra-vesical recurrence-free survival (B-RFS).

RESULTS

In 402 patients, the median follow-up was 29 months. The lower ureter was managed by open transvesical excision in 90 individuals, transurethral and laparoscopic dissection in 76, laparoscopic or open extra-vesical excision in 31 and 42 respectively, and transurethral dissection and pluck in 163. 114(28.4%) patients had a bladder recurrence during follow-up. There was no difference in B-RFS between lower-end techniques by Kaplan-Meier (p = 0.94). When all factors were taken into account by adjusted Cox-regression, preceding ureteroscopy (HR 2.65, p = 0.001), lower ureteric tumour location (HR 2.16, p = 0.02), previous bladder cancer (HR 1.75, p = 0.01) and male gender (HR 1.61, p = 0.03) were associated with B-RFS.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest in appropriately selected patients, lower ureteric management technique does not affect B-RFS. Along with lower ureteric tumour location, male gender and previous bladder cancer, preceding ureteroscopy was associated with a higher recurrence rate following NU, and the indication for this should be carefully considered.

Urinary bladder recurrences following ureteroscopic biopsies of upper tract urothelial cancers: a multi-centre observational study with genomic assessment for clonality

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Urinary bladder recurrences (UBRs) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNUx) are a known challenge in patients with upper-tract urothelial cancers (UTUCs). We aim to assess factors associated with UBR and clonal-relatedness with resected UTUC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent RNUx for UTUC between 1998 and 2015 in five institutions were identified. Clonal relatedness between primary UTUC and subsequent UBR in a sub-cohort was assessed using next-generation sequencing. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to assess differences in UBR between two groups (with or without ureteroscopic biopsy).

RESULTS

Of 267 patients with complete records, 73 (27.3%) had UBR during follow-up. The five-year UBR-free survival in all patients was 64.7%. The five-year UBR-free-survival was inferior in patients who underwent URS biopsy compared with patients who did not undergo ureteroscopic biopsy (49.9% vs 76.4%, p < 0.001). History of bladder tumour (HR, 95% CI; 2.94, 1.73-5.00, p < 0.001), ureteroscopic biopsy (HR, 95% CI; 2.21, 1.38-3.53, p = 0.001) and preoperative urine cytology ≥C3 (HR, 95% CI; 2.06, 1.24-3.40, p = 0.005) were independently associated with UBR. Patients with ureteroscopic biopsy (n = 3/5) showed identical mutational changes for common genes (TP53 and FGFR3) between primary UTUC and subsequent UBR.

CONCLUSIONS

Ureteroscopic biopsy of UTUC is a significant risk factor for UBR. Qualitative clonality assessment showed identical mutational signatures between primary UTUC and UBR.

Correlation between the timing of diagnostic ureteroscopy for upper tract urothelial cancer and intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the effect of the timing of diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) on intravesical recurrence (IVR) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).

Patients and methods

The clinical data of 220 patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with RNU at our center from June 2010 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the timing of the URS, all patients were divided into three groups: the no URS group, the 1-session group (diagnostic URS immediately followed by RNU), and the 2-session group (RNU after diagnostic URS). Additionally, we analyzed IVR-free survival (IVRFS) using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional regression methods.

Results

The median follow-up period of these 220 patents was 41 (range: 2-143) months. Among them, 58 patients developed IVR following RNU. Kaplan-Meier curve displayed a significantly higher IVR rate in both treatment groups than in the no-URS group (p=0.025). In the subgroup of patients with renal pelvis cancer, the incidence of IVR was significantly higher in both treatment groups than in the group without URS (p=0.006). In univariate Cox proportional regression analysis, the two treatment groups were risk factors for IVR compared to the no-URS group [p=0.027, hazard ratio (HR): 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-3.46]. The two-stage group (p=0.032, HR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.08-3.65), positive urine pathology (p<0.001, HR: 8.12, 95% CI: 3.63-18.15), adjuvant chemotherapy (p<0.001, HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.10-0.38), and positive margin (p<0.0001, HR: 7.50, 95% CI: 2.44-23.08) were all identified as independent predictors in the multivariate.

Conclusion

This study revealed that delayed RNU following diagnostic URS may increase the risk of postoperative IVR in patients with UTUC, preoperatively positive uropathology, and positive surgical margin were risk factors for IVR after RNU, while early postoperative chemotherapy may effectively prevent IVR. Delay of RUN after URS could increase the risk of IVR.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: Upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC)

INTRODUCTION

The aim was to propose an update of the French Urology Association Cancer Committee (ccAFU) Recommendations on the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UC).

METHODS

A systematic Medline search was performed between 2020 and 2022, taking account of the diagnosis, treatment options and follow-up of UUT-UC, while evaluating the references with their levels of evidence.

RESULTS

The diagnosis of this rare pathology is based on CTU acquisition during excretion and flexible ureterorenoscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment. Nevertheless conservative treatment can be discussed for low risk lesions: tumour of low-grade, with no infiltration on imaging, unifocal<2cm, eligible for full treatment therefore requiring close endoscopic surveillance by flexible ureteroscopy in compliant patients. After RNU, postoperative instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to reduce the risk of recurrence in the bladder. Adjuvant chemotherapy has shown clinical benefits compared to surveillance after RNU for tumours (pT2-T4 N0-3 M0).

CONCLUSION

These updated recommendations should contribute to improving not only patients' level of care, but also the diagnosis and decision-making concerning treatment for UUT-UC.

Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tasciogulu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Haydarpasa Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tasciogulu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Department of Urology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. Biopsy with Ureterorenoscopy Before Radical Nephroureterectomy is Associated with Increased Intravesical Recurrence in Urothelial Cancer Located in the Kidney

OBJECTIVE

Diagnostic ureterorenoscopy is used to identify upper tract urothelial cancer before radical nephro ureterectomy, especially for uncertain lesions in imaging modalities or urine cytology. However, diagnostic ureterorenoscopy can potentially cause intravesical tumor spillage and can increase intravesical recurrence rates. We aimed to investigate the impact of diagnostic ureterorenoscopy before radical nephroureterectomy, with and without biopsy, on intravesical recurrence rates of patients with upper tract urothelial cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with localized upper tract urothelial cancer from 8 different tertiary referral centers, who underwent radical nephroureterectomy between 2001 and 2020, were included. Three groups were made: no URS (group 1); diagnostic ureterorenoscopy without biopsy (group 2); and diagnostic ure terorenoscopy with biopsy (group 3). Intravesical recurrence rates and survival outcomes were compared. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the factors that were asso ciated with intravesical recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

Twenty-two (20.8%), 10 (24.4%), and 23 (39%) patients experienced intravesical recurrence in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P=.037) among 206 patients. The 2-year intravesical recurrence-free sur vival rate was 83.1%, 82.4%, and 69.2%, for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P=.004). Cancer-specific survival and overall survival were comparable (P=.560 and P=.803, respectively). Diagnostic ureterore noscopy+biopsy (hazard ratio: 6.88, 95% CI: 2.41-19.65, P < .001) was the only independent predictor of intravesical recurrence in patients with upper tract urothelial cancer located in the kidney, according to tumor location.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic ureterorenoscopy+biopsy before radical nephroureterectomy significantly increased the rates of intravesical recurrence in tumors located in kidney. This result suggests tumor spillage with this type of biopsy, so further studies with different biopsy options or without biopsy can be designed.

Adverse Prognostic Impact of Diagnostic Ureterorenoscopy in a Subset of Patients with High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Radical Nephroureterectomy

Background: We hypothesized that diagnostic ureterorenoscopy (URS) may adversely affect prognosis in a subset of patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Methods: The present retrospective study included 143 patients with UTUC treated between 2010 and 2021 at two tertiary care hospitals, of whom 79 received URS prior to RNU. Subgroups were stratified by clinicopathological variables relevant to prognosis. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the prognostic impact of URS on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after RNU. Results: During follow-up (median 54 months for survivors), 32 cases of all-cause mortality and 40 cases of progression were recorded. No significant difference was found in OS or PFS between patients with and without URS. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that URS was significantly associated with worse OS (p < 0.001) and PFS (p = 0.008) in 29 patients with non-papillary and ≥pT3 UTUC. Importantly, URS did not have any adverse effects on prognosis in 62 patients with papillary and ≤pT2 UTUC (p = 0.005). Conclusions: URS may adversely affect prognosis of UTUC patients, specifically non-papillary and ≥pT3 disease. URS may better be avoided in patients with high-risk UTUC features unless URS is necessary to diagnose UTUC. This study also corroborates the oncological safety of URS in those with low-risk UTUC.

The Impact of Diagnostic Ureteroscopy Prior to Radical Nephroureterectomy on Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The incidence of intravesical recurrence (IVR) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is reported in up to 50% of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). It was suggested that preoperative diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) could increase the IVR rate after RNU. However, the available data are often conflicting. Thus, in this systematic review and meta-analysis we sought to synthesize available data for the impact of pre-RNU URS for UTUC on IVR and other oncological outcomes. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in June 2021. Cumulative analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were conducted. The primary endpoint was intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), with the secondary endpoints being cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Results: Among a total of 5489 patients included in the sixteen selected papers, 2387 (43.4%) underwent diagnostic URS before RNU and 3102 (56.6%) did not. Pre-RNU diagnostic URS was significantly associated with worse IVRFS after RNU (HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.29–1.61, p < 0.001) than RNU alone. However, subgroup analysis including patients without biopsy during URS revealed no significant impact of diagnostic URS on IVRFS (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.90–1.80, p = 0.16). The results of other analyses showed no significant differences in CSS (HR = 0.94, p = 0.63), OS (HR: 0.94, p = 0.56), and MFS (HR: 0.91, p = 0.37) between patients who underwent URS before RNU and those who did not. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis confirm that diagnostic URS prior to RNU is significantly associated with worse IVRFS, albeit with no concurrent impact on the other long-term survival outcomes. Our results indicate that URS has a negative impact on IVRFS only when combined with endoscopic biopsy. Future studies are warranted to assess the role of immediate postoperative intravesical chemotherapy in patients undergoing biopsy during URS for suspected UTUC.

[French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma]

INTRODUCTION

-The purpose was to propose an update of the French guidelines from the national committee ccAFU on upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC).

METHODS

- A systematic Medline search was performed between 2018 and 2020, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of UTUC, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence.

RESULTS

- The diagnosis of this rare pathology is based on CT-scan acquisition during excretion and ureteroscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, nevertheless a conservative endoscopic approach can be proposed for low risk lesion: unifocal tumor, possible complete resection and low grade and absence of invasion on CT-scan. Close monitoring with endoscopic follow-up (flexible ureteroscopy) in compliant patients is therefore necessary. After RNU, bladder instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to reduce risk of bladder recurrence. A systemic chemotherapy is recommended after RNU in pT2-T4 N0-3 M0 disease.

CONCLUSION

- These updated guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for diagnosis and treatment for UTUC.