Incidence and risk of infection in egyptian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Particularités des complications infectieuses au cours de lupus érythémateux systémique

AIM

To describe characteristics of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with infectious complications and to determine frequency, clinical and microbiological features and outcomes of reported infections.

METHODS

This is a descriptive, retrospective study conducted over an 11-year period at the Internal Medicine Department La Rabta Hospital Tunis, collecting medical records of SLE patients who had experienced infectious complications.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included, consisting of 52 females and 4 males (gender ratio M/F= 0.07). The mean age at SLE diagnosis was 35±13.8 years. The mean duration of the disease was 4.8±3.1 years. A total of seventy-eight infections were documented. Infection revealed the disease in 12 patients (21%) and occurred after an average delay of 36 months [1-156 months] of SLE diagnosis. Forty-three patients (74%) were receiving corticosteroid therapy, associated in 37.5% of cases with immunosuppressive treatment. Urinary and pleuro-pulmonary infections were most common infectious sites. An infectious agent was identified in 59 cases (76%). Bacterial infections were the most common (76%), dominated by the enterobacteria pathogen agent. Viral infections (n=12) were mainly caused by varicella-zoster virus and cytomegalovirus. Five patients required intensive care. Twenty patients experienced a lupus flare during the infectious episode. The outcome was favorable in 52 (93%) patients. Three patients died, two due to septic shock caused by pulmonary infection in two cases and cutaneous infection in one patient. One patient died from a probable pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSION

Infectious complications are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality during SLE. Hence the importance of early diagnosis and adequate management.

Clinical Features and Disease Damage Risk Factors in an Egyptian SLE Cohort: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has a variable natural history and clinical characteristics.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the clinical and immunological characteristics, and assess the disease accrual of an Egyptian SLE cohort.

METHODS

The study included 569 SLE patients who were collected from three different centers; demographic, laboratory data, cumulative manifestations, and comorbidities were assessed (characteristics at the time of diagnosis were recorded retrospectively, while current clinical data were recorded cross-sectionally). Evaluation of disease activity was done using Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score (SLEDAI) and damage by Systemic Lupus International Collaborative Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI).

RESULTS

The median age of patients at disease onset was 25.0±10.5 years, the median disease duration was 4.0 (6.5) years, the female to male ratio was (12.5:1), and the median SLEDAI was 12.0±14.0. Family history of SLE was noticed in 4%. Antinuclear antibody was positive in all patients and 86% had positive anti-double-stranded DNA. Arthritis/arthralgia was the most frequent presenting symptom (44%) followed by fever (39%). Along the disease course; alopecia was the most common clinical manifestation (76.1%), followed by constitutional symptoms (75.9%), and nephritis (65.7%). Three hundred and five patients encountered organ damage (SDI >1); kidney damage was the most frequent (32%), followed by cardiovascular damage (24.3%). Neutropenia, hypocomplementemia, arthritis, hypertension, longer disease duration, and higher disease activity were found to be independent risk factors for disease damage.

CONCLUSIONS

There are some diversities and similarities in our findings compared to the previously reported data. Arthritis is the most common presenting symptom, while alopecia is the most frequent clinical finding, and a higher prevalence of nephritis was reported. Renal damage is the most frequent outcome.

Evaluation of serum presepsin, procalcitonin, copeptin, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein for differentiating bacterial infection from disease activity in Egyptian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

Several biological markers have been studied for the differentiation of infection from disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with discrepant results. We aimed to evaluate the role of serum presepsin, hs-CRP, procalcitonin (PCT), and copeptin (CPP) in differentiating bacterial infections from disease activity in SLE patients.

METHODS

This study is a cross-sectional observational study in which 94 Egyptian patients were recruited from June 2017 to January 2018. Our patients were divided into two groups: group (1) included 48 patients with active SLE hospitalized with any sort of lupus activity and group (2) included 46 patients with active SLE admitted with a proven bacterial infection. Hs-CRP, presepsin, PCT, and CPP were measured using enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay technique.

RESULTS

Hs-CRP, presepsin, PCT, and CPP were highly significantly higher among group (2) patients compared to group (1) patients (p < 0.001). Serum presepsin expressed higher specificity than hs-CRP (87.5% vs 60.4%) but the same sensitivity (80.4%) in the detection of bacterial infection in SLE patients. Serum PCT expressed higher specificity than hs-CRP (100% vs 60.4%) but lower sensitivity (73.9% vs 80.4%). Serum CPP expressed higher specificity than hs-CRP (65.9% vs 60.4%) but lower sensitivity (65.9% vs 80.4%).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that increased serum levels of hs-CRP, presepsin and PCT levels are useful in differentiating bacterial infections from disease activity in SLE patients. Serum CPP could be used as an adjunct with more specific inflammatory biomarkers in making better diagnostic judgments.

KEY POINTS

• The increased serum levels of hs-CRP, presepsin and PCT levels are useful in differentiating bacterial infections from disease activity in SLE patients. • Serum Presepsin expressed higher specificity than hs-CRP but the same sensitivity in the detection of bacterial infection in SLE patients. • Serum CPP expressed higher specificity than hs-CRP but lower sensitivity.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors of infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

OBJECTIVE

Infection is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors of infection in SLE by comparing demographic factors, laboratory data, clinical features, and therapeutic factors between infection and non-infection SLE patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched systematically without restricting the language or year (up to September 2019) by using MeSH terms and keywords pertaining to SLE and infection. Three independent reviewers selected all observational studies based on the established inclusion criteria. Odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used and the analyses were carried out by using a random/fixed-effects model. When necessary, different subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Study quality was assessed by the modified version (nine-star scoring system) of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and publication bias was evaluated by funnel plots, and Egger's and Begg's tests.

RESULTS

In total, we included 39 studies (3709 infection SLE patients and 10526 non-infection SLE patients) based on the inclusion criteria. Compared with the SLE patients without infection, we found that infected SLE patients had a significantly higher incidence rate of the following: 1) lymphopenia (OR = 2.738 95%CI (1.017-7.376), P = 0.046, I² = 81.4%), 2) thrombocytopenia (OR = 1.61 95%CI (1.4-1.85), P<0.001, I² = 0%), 3) anemia (OR = 2.294 95%CI (1.402-3.755), P = 0.001, I² = 83.0%), 4) hypoproteinemia (OR = 2.336 95%CI (1.408-3.876), P = 0.001, I² = 84.2%), 5) C3 consumed (OR = 1.890 95%CI (1.190-3.002), P = 0.007, I² = 77.4%), 6) diabetes mellitus (OR = 3.890 95%CI (2.450-6.160), P < 0.001, I² = 0%), 7) elevated creatinine (OR = 1.954 95%CI (1.646-2.320), P < 0.001, I² = 0.0%), 8) renal involvement (OR = 2.692 95%CI (2.000-3.623), P < 0.001, I² = 76.0%), 9) serositis (OR = 3.877 95%CI (0.995-15.110), P = 0.051, I² = 79.1%), and 10) use of steroid immunosuppressants (OR = 3.116 95%CI (1.959-4.957), P < 0.001, I² = 77.9%). Furthermore, infected SLE patients had a significantly higher mean dose of prednisone (SMD = 2.088 95%CI (1.196-2.981), P < 0.001, I² = 97.8%). In addition, SLE patients with infection showed a significantly lower incidence of antimalarial drug use (OR = 0.634 95%CI (0.451-0.892), P = 0.009, I² = 56.0%). Infected SLE patients had a significantly higher level of 1) 24-h urinary protein (SMD = 0.560 95%CI (0.300-0.810), P < 0.001, I² = 0%), 2) CRP (SMD = 0.437 95%CI (0.184-0.691), P = 0.001, I² = 68.6%), and 3) SLE Collaborating Clinics damage index (SDI) (SMD = 0.451 95%CI (0.238-0.664), P < 0.001, I² = 0.0%), along with a significantly lower level of albumin (SMD = -0.400 95%CI (-0.610--0.200), P < 0.001, I² = 0.0%). After adjustment for false discovery rate (FDR), lymphopenia and serositis were no longer associated with the occurrence of infection; however, the remaining factors were still associated with infection in SLE. According to the nine-star scoring system of NOS, 71.79% of the studies were considered as high methodological quality (low risk of bias). No significant publication bias, except for renal involvement, was detected from funnel plots or Egger's and Begg's test, while this publication bias of renal involvement did not impact the pooled estimates.

CONCLUSION

We identified many factors including thrombocytopenia, anemia, hypoproteinemia, hypocomplementemia, hypoalbuminemia, higher level of CRP, higher SDI score, renal involvement and diabetes mellitus that were associated with infection in SLE patients. In addition, glucocorticoids (especially high-dose) and immunosuppressants (e.g. cyclophosphamide) rendered SLE patients more susceptible to infection, while antimalarial drug administration (hydroxychloroquine) was a protective factor against infection in SLE patients. SLE patients with the above clinical characteristics and risk factors might be at high risk from infection, which might contribute to the early identification of infection in SLE patients for better prognosis.