The Role of Plasma Chromogranin A as Assessment of Treatment Response in Non-functioning Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Response heterogeneity as a new biomarker of treatment response in patients with neuroendocrine tumors

Aim: The RAISE project aimed to find a surrogate end point to predict treatment response early in patients with enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Response heterogeneity, defined as the coexistence of responding and non-responding lesions, has been proposed as a predictive marker for progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with NETs. Patients & methods: Computerized tomography scans were analyzed from patients with multiple lesions in CLARINET (NCT00353496; n = 148/204). Cox regression analyses evaluated association between response heterogeneity, estimated using the standard deviation of the longest diameter ratio of target lesions, and NET progression. Results: Greater response heterogeneity at a given visit was associated with earlier progression thereafter: week 12 hazard ratio (HR; 95% confidence interval): 1.48 (1.20-1.82); p < 0.001; n = 148; week 36: 1.72 (1.32-2.24); p < 0.001; n = 108. HRs controlled for sum of longest diameter ratio: week 12: 1.28 (1.04-1.59); p = 0.020 and week 36: 1.81 (1.20-2.72); p = 0.005. Conclusion: Response heterogeneity independently predicts PFS in patients with enteropancreatic NETs. Further validation is required.

Predictive Factors for Resistant Disease with Medical/Radiologic/Liver-Directed Anti-Tumor Treatments in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Advances and Controversies

Purpose: Recent advances in the diagnosis, management and nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) have led to an emerging need for sensitive and useful prognostic factors for predicting responses/survival. Areas covered: The predictive value of a number of reported prognostic factors including clinically-related factors (clinical/laboratory/imaging/treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological/classification/grading), and molecular factors, on therapeutic outcomes of anti-tumor medical therapies with molecular targeting agents (everolimus/sunitinib/somatostatin analogues), chemotherapy, radiological therapy with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, or liver-directed therapies (embolization/chemoembolization/radio-embolization (SIRTs)) are reviewed. Recent findings in each of these areas, as well as remaining controversies and uncertainties, are discussed in detail, particularly from the viewpoint of treatment sequencing. Conclusions: The recent increase in the number of available therapeutic agents for the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs have raised the importance of prognostic factors predictive for therapeutic outcomes of each treatment option. The establishment of sensitive and useful prognostic markers will have a significant impact on optimal treatment selection, as well as in tailoring the therapeutic sequence, and for maximizing the survival benefit of each individual patient. In the paper, the progress in this area, as well as the controversies/uncertainties, are reviewed.

Early response assessment and prediction of overall survival after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

Background

Response after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) can be evaluated using anatomical imaging (CT/MRI), somatostatin receptor imaging ([⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT), and serum Chromogranin-A (CgA). The aim of this retrospective study is to assess the role of these response evaluation methods and their predictive value for overall survival (OS).

Methods

Imaging and CgA levels were acquired prior to start of PRRT, and 3 and 9 months after completion. Tumour size was measured on anatomical imaging and response was categorized according to RECIST 1.1 and Choi criteria. [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake was quantified in both target lesions depicted on anatomical imaging and separately identified PET target lesions, which were either followed over time or newly identified on each scan with PERCIST-based criteria. Response evaluation methods were compared with Cox regression analyses and Log Rank tests for association with OS.

Results

A total of 44 patients were included, with median follow-up of 31 months (IQR 26–36 months) and median OS of 39 months (IQR 32mo-not reached)d. Progressive disease after 9 months (according to RECIST 1.1) was significantly associated with worse OS compared to stable disease [HR 9.04 (95% CI 2.10–38.85)], however not compared to patients with partial response. According to Choi criteria, progressive disease was also significantly associated with worse OS compared to stable disease [HR 6.10 (95% CI 1.38–27.05)] and compared to patients with partial response [HR 22.66 (95% CI 2.33–219.99)]. In some patients, new lesions were detected earlier with [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT than with anatomical imaging. After 3 months, new lesions on [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT which were not visible on anatomical imaging, were detected in 4/41 (10%) patients and in another 3/27 (11%) patients after 9 months. However, no associations between change in uptake on ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT or serum CgA measurements and OS was observed.

Conclusions

Progression on anatomical imaging performed 9 months after PRRT is associated with worse OS compared to stable disease or partial response. Although new lesions were detected earlier with [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT than with anatomical imaging, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake, and serum CgA after PRRT were not predictive for OS in this cohort with limited number of patients and follow-up time.

Ki-67 Index of 5% is Better Than 2% in Stratifying G1 and G2 of the World Health Organization Grading System in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

OBJECTIVE

The World Health Organization (WHO) grading system for the stratification of G1 and G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) using an optimal Ki-67 index cutoff is still controversial. The present study aimed at finding one optimal Ki-67 cutoff value that distinguishes G1 and G2 tumors by analyzing the prognosis of patients with pNET in our center.

METHODS

Data from 84 patients with pNET undergoing surgical resection in The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between March 2003 and October 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rate was 74.2%. Univariate analysis revealed that functional secretion, WHO grade, and TNM stage were significantly associated with long-term survival (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that WHO grade (P = 0.023) and TNM stage (P = 0.040) were independent prognostic factors. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the Ki-67 index of 5% had the best predictive ability (76.7%) for 5-year survival with a hazard ratio of 44.7. The hazard ratio was only 8.14 when the Ki-67 index cutoff was 2%.

CONCLUSIONS

TNM stage and WHO grade were independent prognostic factors of pNETs. A Ki-67 index of 5% is better than 2% in stratifying G1 and G2 pNET tumors.

From Mouth to Brain: Neuroendocrine Markers Play as a Crosstalk Among Oral and Neurodegenerative Diseases

The neuroendocrine system consists of various cells distributed in non-endocrine functional structures, able to synthesize amines and peptides with both local (paracrine) and systemic (endocrine) effects. The presence of such cells, belonging to the neuroendocrine system, is highlighted by the presence of neuroendocrine markers: the most suggestive are chromogranin A, synaptophysin, S-100B protein and glial fibrillary acidic protein. The presence of neuroendocrine markers is commonly associated to the occurrence of neuroendocrine cancers, currently representing the 0.5 percent of all malignant tumors. Nevertheless, neuroendocrine markers have been found to be overexpressed in rare oral neuroendocrine tumors, but also in quite common inflammatory conditions, such as severe periodontitis. The monitoring of neuroendocrine markers is, thus, a common factor of interest among dentistry and neurology: the analysis of neuroendocrine markers in oral diseases may be predictive and prognostic about the severity of neurological diseases, such as lateral amyotrophic sclerosis and traumatic brain injuries. The aim of this mini-review is to highlight the role of neuroendocrine molecules as advantageous diagnostic and prognostic markers for both oral diseases and neurodegenerative disorders.

Non-functioning gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tumors: a 111In-Pentetreotide SPECT/CT diagnostic study

In a retrospective study performed in non-functioning GEP tumor patients we further investigated ¹¹¹In-Pentetreotide SPECT/CT usefulness in diagnosis, staging and follow-up also evaluating whether the procedure may give more information than conventional imaging procedures (CIP), such as CT, MRI, US. We enrolled 104 consecutive patients with non-functioning GEP tumors, 30 in initial diagnosis and staging phases (IDS) and 74 in follow-up (FU). All patients underwent somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) whole body scan at 4, 24 and, if necessary, 48 hours followed by abdominal and chest SPECT/CT after ¹¹¹In-Pentetreotide 148-222 MBq i.v. injection. The patients previously underwent 2 to 3 CIP. At both CIP and SPECT/CT, 34/104 patients were classified as no evidence of disease (NED); in 70/104 patients, neoplastic lesions were ascertained and 12 IDS and 17 FU were classified as not operable and treated with octeotride or chemotherapy. SPECT/CT and CIP were concordantly positive in 44 patients, while only CIP was positive in 6 cases and only SPECT/CT in 20. Both per-patient sensitivity and accuracy of SPECT/CT (91.4 and 94.2%, respectively) were higher than CIP (71.4 and 80.8%, respectively), but not significantly. Globally, 292 lesions were ascertained: 141 hepatic, 78 abdominal extra-hepatic and 73 extra-abdominal. CIP detected 191/292 (65.4%) lesions in 50 patients, while SPECT/CT 244/292 (83.6%) in 64, the difference being significant (p<0.0001). No false positive results were found at both SPECT/CT and CIP. Both SPECT/CT sensitivity and accuracy were higher than CIP in G1, G2, neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) patients, but significantly only for G1. Globally, SPECT/CT incremental value than CIP was 35.6%. SPECT/CT correctly modified CIP classification and patient management in 27.9% of cases, while it down-staged the disease than CIP in 9.6% of cases. However, the two procedures combined use could achieve the highest accuracy value. ¹¹¹In-Pentetreotide SRS, acquired as SPECT/CT, showing high sensitivity and accuracy values, more elevated than CIP in the present study, can still have a wide employment in the routine diagnostic protocol of non-functioning GEP tumors with significant impact on patient management and therapy planning. The procedure is simple to perform, has limited cost and wide availability in all Nuclear Medicine Centers.

Baseline plasma chromogranin A levels in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: A potential predictor of postoperative recurrence

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to elucidate prognostic values of baseline plasma chromogranin A (CgA) concentrations in patients with resectable, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs).

METHODS

Preoperative CgA levels in 21 patients with PNET were correlated with clinicopathological factors and patients' survival.

RESULTS

Plasma CgA levels ranged 2.9-30.8 pmol/mL (median 6.0), and were significantly elevated in patients with post-operative recurrence (P = 0.004). Using the receiver operating characteristic curve, the optimal cutoff value to predict tumor recurrence was determined as 17.0 pmol/mL. This threshold identified patients with recurrence with 60% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 90% overall accuracy. Patients with higher CgA levels showed worse recurrence-free survival than those with low CgA levels, both in total (P < 0.001) and in G2 patients (P = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined plasma CgA concentrations and WHO grading may assist in better stratification of PNET patients in terms of the risk of recurrence.