Optimal Adjuvant Treatment for Curatively Resected Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Radiotherapy Perspective

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Society for Radiation Oncology Updated Clinical Practice Guidelines on Multimodality Therapy for Locally Advanced Cancer of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction

Outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer have improved over the last decade with the implementation of multimodality therapy. There are currently no comprehensive guidelines addressing multidisciplinary management of esophageal cancer that have incorporated the input of surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. To address the need for multidisciplinary input in the management of esophageal cancer and to meet current best practices for clinical practice guidelines, the current guidelines were created as a collaboration between The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Physician representatives chose 8 key clinical questions pertinent to the care of patients with locally advanced, resectable thoracic esophageal cancer (excluding cervical location). A comprehensive literature review was performed identifying 227 articles that met the inclusion criteria covering the use of induction chemotherapy, chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy before surgery, optimal radiation dose, the value of esophagectomy, timing of esophagectomy, the approach and extent of lymphadenectomy, the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy, and the value of adjuvant therapy after resection. The relevant data were reviewed and voted on by the panel with 80% of the authors, with 75% agreement on class and level of evidence. These data were then complied into the guidelines document.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Society for Radiation Oncology Updated Clinical Practice Guidelines on Multimodality Therapy for Locally Advanced Cancer of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction

Outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer have improved over the last decade with the implementation of multimodality therapy. There are currently no comprehensive guidelines addressing multidisciplinary management of esophageal cancer that have incorporated the input of surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. To address the need for multidisciplinary input in the management of esophageal cancer and to meet current best practices for clinical practice guidelines, the current guidelines were created as a collaboration between The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Physician representatives chose 8 key clinical questions pertinent to the care of patients with locally advanced, resectable thoracic esophageal cancer (excluding cervical location). A comprehensive literature review was performed identifying 227 articles that met the inclusion criteria covering the use of induction chemotherapy, chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy before surgery, optimal radiation dose, the value of esophagectomy, timing of esophagectomy, the approach and extent of lymphadenectomy, the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy, and the value of adjuvant therapy after resection. The relevant data were reviewed and voted on by the panel with 80% of the authors, with 75% agreement on class and level of evidence. These data were then complied into the guidelines document.

A meta-analysis on surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy to treat squamous cell esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the sixth most common cause of cancer-related mortality in the world. Currently, surgery is the recommended treatment modality when possible. The outcomes of surgery alone are poor, and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) has been used to patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) for years. However, the value of PORT for patients with ESCC after curative resection remains controversial. To assess the benefits and harms of postoperative radiotherapy compared with surgery alone for patients with ESCC we performed in this meta-analysis.

METHOD

A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed via the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1st, 1990 to October 1st, 2018 for relevant trials. The primary outcomes of interest are overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and seven retrospective studies (RS) were included, for a total of 5640 patients with 1774 in the PORT group and 3866 in the surgery alone group respectively. Meta-analysis showed there were significant increases both for OS (HR 0.86, 95%CI 0.79-0.93, p = 0.0004) and DFS (HR 0.74, 95%CI 0.63-0.87, p = 0.004) for patients administered PORT compared with surgery alone. Regarding the postoperative recurrence, PORT can significantly reduce the local recurrence rate (OR 0.34, 95%CI 0.29-0.40, p < 0.00001), while it showed no difference in distant metastasis (OR 1.09, 95%CI 0.91-1.30, p = 0.37). Subgroup analysis demonstrated PORT can improve the OS for patients with positive lymph node (N+, HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.59-0.90, p < 0.00001), curative resection (R0 resection, HR 0.81, 95%CI 0.73-0.90, p < 0.0001) and T3 stage (HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.80-1.0, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PORT improved the OS and DFS for patients with ESCC compared with surgery alone, and significantly reduced the local recurrence. PORT showed survival benefits for specific subgroups such as patients with positive lymph node, R0 resection margin and T3 stage.

Radical esophagectomy for stage II and III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma followed by adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: Which is more beneficial?

Background

This retrospective study compared the efficacy and side effect profile between postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in stage II or stage III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) patients who underwent curative (R0) esophagectomy.

Methods

A total of 272 TESCC patients who underwent radical esophagectomy from 2007 to 2016 were included in this retrospective analysis. All cases were pathologically confirmed with stage II or III disease and 148 patients received postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), while the remaining 124 patients received postoperative radiotherapy (RT) alone.

Results

In CRT and RT groups, the three‐year overall survival rates were 51.3 versus 31.5% (P < 0.01) and the median overall survival (OS) was 39 months (95% CI, 31.6 to 46.3 months) and 30 months (95% CI, 21.0 to 38.9 months), respectively (P = 0.213). Three‐year disease‐free survival rates (DFS) were 30.5% versus 15.9% (P = 0.008), while the median DFS times were 26 months (95% CI, 17.7 to 34.3 months) and 19 months (95% CI, 16.4 to 21.6 months), respectively (P = 0.156). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh edition) stage and N stage were independent prognostic factors for overall survival, while the N stage was an independent prognostic factor for disease‐free survival.

Conclusions

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy led to one‐ and three‐year overall survival benefits along with an obvious increase in treatment side effects for stage II to III TESCC patients, with no further improvement in five‐year survival. However, the chemoradiotherapy benefits mainly favor stage III,number of resected lymph nodes less than 15, younger (less than 60 years old) and smoking patients.

miR-92b-3p Functions As A Key Gene In Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer As Determined By Co-Expression Analysis

Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a highly aggressive malignancy. The aims of the present study were to screen the critical miRNA and corresponding target genes that related to development of ESCC by weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) and investigate the functions by experimental validation.

Methods

Datasets of mRNA and miRNA expression data were downloaded from GEO. The R software was used for data preprocessing and differential expression gene analysis. The differentially expressed protein-coding genes (DEGs) and miRNAs (DEMs) were selected (FDR <0.05 or |Fold Change (FC)| >1.5). Meanwhile, 81 expression data of ESCC patients in TCGA combined with clinic information were applied by WGCNA to create networks. The correlational analyses between each module and clinical parameters were conducted, and enrichment analyses of GO and KEGG were subsequently performed. Then, a series of experiments were conducted in ESCC cells by use of miRNA mimics.

Results

In total, 4,023 DEGs and 328 DEMs were screened. After checking good genes and samples, 3,841 genes (3,696 DEGs and 145 DEMs) were used for WGCNA. As a consequence, altogether 11 gene modules were found. Among them, the brown modules were found to be strongly inversely associated with pathological grade. Meanwhile, has-mir-92b, the only miRNA in brown module, had a positive correlation with grade and negatively correlated with potential target gene (KFL4 and DCS2) in the same module. Furthermore, an increased expression of miR-92b-3p and down-regulated KLF4 and DSC2 protein was detected in the ESCC clinical samples. Up-regulated miR-92b-3p shortened G0/G1 phase and promote ESCC cells invasion and migration. Furthermore, we verified that DSC2 and KFL4 was target genes of miR-92b-3p by luciferase report assay.

Conclusion

WGCNA is an efficient approach to system biology. By this procedure, miR-92b-3p was identified as an ESCC-promoting gene by target KLF4 and DCS2.

Homeobox D10, a tumor suppressor, inhibits the proliferation and migration of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most common types of esophageal cancer, which is the sixth leading cause of cancer death globally. Homeobox D10 (HOXD10) is a member of the homeobox (HOX) gene family and has been reported to act as a tumor suppressor. However, the potential role of HOXD10 in ESCC has not been reported. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the expression and function of HOXD10 in ESCC. The expressions of HOXD10 in human ESCC tissues and cell lines were detected by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and Western blot. The HOXD10 overexpressing cell lines were established, then CCK-8 and Transwell assays were performed to examine cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, respectively. The expression of EMT-related proteins and signaling pathway-related proteins were detected by Western blot. Our results showed that HOXD10 is lowly expressed in ESCC tissues as well as in ESCC cell lines. Ectopic overexpression of HOXD10 inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of ESCC cells (P < 0.05). HOXD10 overexpression repressed the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process in ESCC cells. Besides, HOXD10 overexpression suppressed the activation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. PI3K/Akt agonist, insulin-like growth factor-1, reversed the inhibitory effects of HOXD10 on cell proliferation and migration in ESCC cells. Additional in vivo study proved that ectopic expression of HOXD10 caused an obvious inhibitory effect on the tumor growth. These findings indicated that overexpression of HOXD10 suppressed the proliferation, migration, and invasion via regulating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in ESCC cells. Thus, targeting HOXD10 may be considered as a therapeutic strategy for ESCC treatment.

Adjuvant radiotherapy for stage pN1M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Results from a Chinese two-center study

BACKGROUND

Whether postoperative radiotherapy is beneficial in the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with one or two regional lymph node (LN) metastases (pN1) after esophagectomy is uncertain. This study aimed to explore the effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on survival.

METHODS

Propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to balance the two arms (surgery only [S] or surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy [PORT]). The survival rate was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 992 cases confirmed positive for one or two regional LN metastases were eligible. After PSM, 622 patients were reviewed. Each group consisted of 311 cases. The median follow-up was 80.7 months. For the overall cohort, the one-, three- and five-year overall survival (OS) were 90.6%, 51.9% and 38.2%, respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) was 76.0%, 41.4% and 32.1%, respectively. The five-year OS and DFS were 45.0% and 39.8% for PORT, which was significantly higher than the S group (31.3% and 24.2%, both P < 0.001). On subgroup analysis, PORT was associated with improved OS and DFS for patients with pathological stage pT3-4N1M0, compared with S group (five-year OS 41.3% vs. 23.5%, P < 0.001; five-year DFS 35.8% vs. 18.8%, P < 0.001). However, for pT1-2N1M0 patients, PORT did not benefit OS and DFS compared with S (P = 0.063).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the addition of PORT after esophagectomy was associated with a statistically significant improvement in OS and DFS for patients with pathological one or two lymph-node positive pathology, in particular for stage pT3-4N1M0 patients.

The impact of adjuvant therapies on patient survival and the recurrence patterns for resected stage IIa-IVa lower thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

This study evaluated the impact of adjuvant therapies on patient survival and disease recurrence patterns to identify an effective adjuvant therapy for resected lower thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LTESCC).

Methods

Clinical data of 127 patients with stage IIa-IVa LTESCC with a minimum 2-year follow-up after oesophagectomy were analysed. The survival and recurrence patterns were compared among patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, or surgery alone.

Results

Eighty-eight patients (69.3%) were identified as having disease recurrence. The regional lymph node recurrence rate was 57.5%, and the recurrence rates were high in the lower neck, upper mediastinum, and upper abdomen. Compared to surgery alone, adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy significantly decreased the recurrence rate (p < 0.05). Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy significantly improved overall survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional recurrence-free survival compared to surgery alone (p = 0.01, 0.01, and 0.00, respectively). Pathologically positive lymph nodes (PPLNs) in the lower mediastinum represented a potential risk factor for cervical recurrence (HR 2.97, 95%CI 1.19–7.39). Multivariable analysis showed that postoperative radiotherapy (HR 0.30, 95%CI 0.13–0.68) and PPLNs in the upper mediastinum (HR 3.72, 95%CI 1.30–10.67) were independent risk factors for upper mediastinal recurrence, while postoperative radiotherapy (HR 0.37, 95%CI 0.16–0.85) and PPLNs in the abdomen (HR 2.57, 95%CI 1.12–5.92) were independent risk factors for abdominal recurrence.

Conclusion

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was the most effective adjuvant therapy for resected stage IIa-IVa LTESCC. The lower neck, upper mediastinum, and upper abdomen were high-risk regions for postoperative radiotherapy. The regions of PPLNs may be important factors for individual targets.

Comparison of the effect of postoperative radiotherapy with surgery alone for esophagus squamous cell carcinoma patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of postoperative radiotherapy for patients having esophagus squamous cell carcinoma after radical surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive research was performed in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library electronic databases from inception until December 10, 2017. We collected all published full articles about comparison of surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy with surgery alone.

RESULTS

Four randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) with 1050 participants and 8 non-randomized-controlled trials with 3248 participants were included and evaluated separately. The risk ratio rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Both RCTs and non-randomized-controlled trials (NRCTs) groups showed a significant increase in 3-year overall survival (OS) rate (RRRCT = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.99; RRNRCT = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.76-0.88) and decrease locoregional recurrence rate (RRRCT = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43-0.66; RRNRCT = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.32-0.69) after postoperative radiotherapy compared with surgery alone. The 5-year OS rate in the group of NRCTs was markedly enhanced (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.82-0.92), while that of the RCTs group was not enhanced in a significant way (RR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.70-1.02). Subgroup analysis based on pathological lymph node status revealed that postoperative radiotherapy could improve OS regardless of pathological lymph node status (pathological lymph node positive patients: RR5-year os-RCT = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70-0.93; RR5-year os-NRCT = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.80-0.94; Pathological lymph node negative patients: RR3-year os-RCT = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.96; RR3-year os-NRCT = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.30-0.89). No effect on distant recurrence rate was detected. Adverse effects induced by postoperative radiotherapy were comparatively modest and tolerable.

CONCLUSION

Polled results yielded that postoperative radiotherapy was promising in improving OS and reducing the locoregional recurrence rate. More large-scale up-to-date RCTs are needed to further validate the use of postoperative radiotherapy in modern practice.

Negative lymph node at station 108 is a strong predictor of overall survival in esophageal cancer

A negative lymph node (NLN) may represent a stronger predictor for the overall survival (OS) rate of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), when compared with a positive LN (PLN). The present study aimed to investigate which LN station, containing the NLN, was associated with OS rate. A retrospective review was conducted in 216 patients with ESCC and a forward stepwise Cox regression model analysis was used to assess the relationship between clinical parameters and OS rate. Patients were divided into subgroups according to the status of the LN at station 108. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The ratio of albumin-to-globulin (AGR), and of lymphocytes to neutrophil granulocytes (LNR) in the subgroups were also investigated. Overall, 105p (the PLN number at station 105), 108p, 109p and 7p were confirmed to be risk factors for OS rate (all P<0.05). Conversely, 108n (the NLN number at station 108) was identified as a protective factor for OS rate [hazard ratio (HR) 0.457, P=0.001]. Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with an NLN identified at the station 108 had an improved OS rate compared with those with a PLN identified at station 108 (P=0.006). Patients with only an NLN identified at station 108 had the best OS rate among all the sub-groups examined, and the AGR of this group of patients was higher than those of the other groups. The LN status at station 108 may indicate the prognosis of patients with ESCC, and an NLN may reflect the reaction of the immune system to tumor metastasis in these patients.

Pattern of lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with poor differentiation

The aim of the present study was to explore the pattern of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in poorly-differentiated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (pdESCC) and the implication of postoperative irradiation. A total of 690 patients with pdESCC were retrospectively investigated. The rates of intro-thoracic and extra-thoracic LNM in pdESCC were investigated and compared to previous research on ESCC en bloc. The comparison of the rates between pdESCC and ESCC were performed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. The clinicopathological factors associated with LNM in pdESCC were analyzed by Chi-squared tests, and Fisher's exact test was used to assess the rate difference of extra-thoracic LNM. Logistic-regression analysis was used to explore risk factors associated with lymph node (LN) station. Results demonstrated that the distribution pattern of LNM in pdESCC was significantly different compared with that of ESCC (P<0.05). Univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that risk factors associated with LNM were depth and length (P<0.001 and P<0.001) and multivariate analysis also indicated that the location of the tumor (P=0.042) was a risk factor associated with LNM in pdESCC. Metastasis in the abdominal cavity was significantly higher than in the neck in the middle and lower thoracic pdESCC (both P<0.01). LN station 102 and 7 for upper thoracic ESCC, 101 and 105 for middle thoracic ESCC, and 100 for lower thoracic ESCC were identified as high-risk stations for metastases in pdESCC compared to ESCC. Several parameters, including location and neck metastasis, were identified as risk factors of metastasis for the above sites, respectively. In conclusion, postoperative therapy should include more LN stations in pdESCC depending on risk factors of tumor metastasis individually.

A retrospective study of pattern of recurrence after radical surgery for thoracic esophageal carcinoma with or without postoperative radiotherapy

The present study aimed to investigate the recurrence pattern of thoracic esophageal cancer (TEC) following radical surgery for guiding postoperative radiotherapy (PRT). Patterns of recurrence were analyzed in patients with recurrence for the first time after radical surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Anhui, China) from January 2012 to December 2015. A total of 244 patients were reviewed in the study. The mean recurrence time for patients with PRT was >1 month longer than that for patients without PRT. The lymphatic, anastomotic and hematological recurrence ratios were 87.9 vs. 69.2%, 4.0 vs. 11.5% and 8.0 vs. 17.2%, respectively for patients without and with PRT. The most common recurrence regions were staion1 and station 2-4 (30.0 vs. 36.5% and 37.2% vs. 23.1%, respectively, for patients without and with PRT). The lymphatic recurrence of upper TEC was almost in station1 and station 2-4 (infield). The middle and lower TEC also had a high probability of lymphatic recurrence in station 1 and station 2-4 (totally 76.3 vs. 57.6% and 61.9 vs. 61.1%, respectively). The recurrence ratio significantly decreased in station 2-4 (infield) for middle TEC patients with PRT compared with patients without PRT (P=0.03), while no significant differences in the lymphatic recurrence ratios were observed in other regions (P>0.05). The differences of recurrence ratios in station 7, station 8 and celiac regions (infield) for lower TEC patients without and with PRT also demonstrated no statistical significance (P>0.05). The results of the present study indicated that the lower neck, supraclavicular regions and upper mediastinal regions (station 1, 2 and 4) should be included in the clinic target volume (CTV) for PRT, while lower mediastinal regions, celiac regions and anastomotic may not be included in CTV.