Safety Results and Analysis of Eribulin Efficacy according to Previous Microtubules-Inhibitors Sensitivity in the French Prospective Expanded Access Program for Heavily Pre-treated Metastatic Breast Cancer

Emerging treatment approaches for triple-negative breast cancer

Approximately, 15% of global breast cancer cases are diagnosed as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), identified as the most aggressive subtype due to the simultaneous absence of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2. This characteristic renders TNBC highly aggressive and challenging to treat, as it excludes the use of effective drugs such as hormone therapy and anti-HER2 agents. In this review, we explore standard therapies and recent emerging approaches for TNBC, including PARP inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors, and cytotoxin-conjugated antibodies. The mechanism of action of these drugs and their utilization in clinical practice is explained in a pragmatic and prospective manner, contextualized within the current landscape of standard therapies for this pathology. These advancements present a promising frontier for tailored interventions with the potential to significantly improve outcomes for TNBC patients. Interestingly, while TNBC poses a complex challenge, it also serves as a paradigm and an opportunity for translational research and innovative therapies in the field of oncology.

Optimization of G-CSF dosing schedule in patients treated with eribulin: a modeling approach

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) are commonly given to limit chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, but, in case of weekly chemotherapy such as eribulin, their administration schedules remain empirical.

OBJECTIVES

This pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study was conducted to establish the effect of different G-CSF regimens on neutropenia's incidence for patients treated by eribulin, to propose an optimal G-CSF dosing schedule.

METHODS

A population PK/PD model was developed to describe absolute neutrophil counts' (ANC) time course in 87 cancer patients receiving eribulin. The structural model considered ANC dynamics, neutropenic effect of eribulin and stimulating effect of G-CSF. Final model estimates were used to calculate neutropenia's incidence following different G-CSF dosing schedules for 1000 virtual subjects.

RESULTS

The final model successfully described most of the ANC time course for all patients. Simulations showed that a single G-CSF administration 48 h after each eribulin injection reduced the risk of severe neutropenia from 29.7 to 5.2%. Five days of G-CSF only after the second eribulin injection or no G-CSF administration induces similar incidence of neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Simulations showed a single G-CSF administration 48 h after the end of each eribulin injection seems to be the optimal schedule to reduce eribulin-induced neutropenia. However, the new administration scheme should be tested in real life to evaluate its pertinence.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Eudract 2015-001753-32, 2015/01/26.

Breast cancer treatment-related cardiovascular disturbances: advocacy for a watchful attitude in this never-ending story

INTRODUCTION

Thanks to the emergence of new therapeutics, prognosis and outcome of breast cancer patients (any subtype) have improved significantly. This raises the issue of the interactions and side effects related to the use of multiple drugs. Thus, to decide on a treatment, the optimal benefit risk-ratio should be carefully watched as toxicities such as cardiac ones effect on long-term survival. Indeed, nowadays in France, cardiovascular diseases rank first as causes of death in women.

AREAS COVERED

This non-exhaustive review aims to report the currently available data on cardiac side effects caused by the use of emerging drugs in breast cancer, in localized or metastatic diseases alike. We will focus on HER2-inhibitors, cyclin-dependent-kinase 4/6 and PARP inhibitors, chemotherapy and immunotherapy, before discussing the means of prevention.

EXPERT OPINION

Although this issue has largely been studied, the recent emergence of new drugs emphasizes the necessity for oncologists to adapt their practice to a multidisciplinary model that includes cardio-oncology.

Second-line Eribulin in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer patients. Multicentre Retrospective Study: The TETRIS Trial

Introduction: Large and consistent evidence supports the use of eribulin mesylate in clinical practice in third or later line treatment of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Conversely, there is paucity of data on eribulin efficacy in second line treatment. Methods: We investigated outcomes of 44 mTNBC patients treated from 2013 through 2019 with second line eribulin mesylate in a multicentre retrospective study involving 14 Italian oncologic centres. Results: Median age was 51 years, with 11.4% of these patients being metastatic at diagnosis. Median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) from eribulin starting were 11.9 (95%CI: 8.4-15.5) and 3.5 months (95%CI: 1.7-5.3), respectively. We observed 8 (18.2%) partial responses and 10 (22.7%) patients had stable disease as best response. A longer PFS on previous first line treatment predicted a better OS (HR=0.87, 95%CI: 0.77-0.99, p= 0.038) and a longer PFS on eribulin treatment (HR=0.92, 95%CI: 0.85-0.98, p=0.018). Progression free survival to eribulin was also favorably influenced by prior adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=0.44, 95%CI: 0.22-0.88, p=0.02). Eribulin was generally well tolerated, with grade 3-4 adverse events being recorded in 15.9% of patients. Conclusions: The outcomes described for our cohort are consistent with those reported in the pivotal Study301 and subsequent observational studies. Further data from adequately-sized, ad hoc trials on eribulin use in second line for mTNBC are warranted to confirm our findings.

Eribulin Efficacy on Brain Metastases in Heavily Pretreated Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

The onset of brain metastases (BM) is a major turning point during advanced breast cancer (ABC) evolution, with only few treatment options when local therapies have failed. The therapeutic effect of eribulin, a wildly used drug in the treatment of ABC, remains unclear in this setting. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study to assess eribulin efficacy in patients with ABC who displayed BM at time of eribulin initiation. We collected data from the medical files of all ABC patients who received eribulin at our institution from 2012 until 2020. Our main endpoint was the central nervous system (CNS) progression-free survival. (CNS-PFS). Other evaluation criteria were extra-cranial progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Twenty patients with BM monitoring data available were selected out of the 549 who received eribulin during the inclusion period. Fifteen patients (75%) had BM progressive as the best response, three patients (15%) had disease stabilization for more than 6 months and only one patient had a partial response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Median CNS-PFS was 3.39 months (95CI (3.02–3.76)). Cox univariate analysis identified molecular subtype as the only prognostic parameter in our cohort, with patients with hormone-receptor positive tumors less likely to experience CNS progression than those with triple-negative MBC (HR = 0.23 (95CI = 0.07–0.80), p = 0.021). Median extra-cranial PFS was 2.67 months (95CI (2.33–3.01)). Median OS was 7.68 months (95CI (0–17.41)). Conclusion: Eribulin seems to have only a limited impact on BM evolution. Hormone receptors expression may identify a subset of patients with better BM control.

Systematic review of Real-World effectiveness of eribulin for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Eribulin mesylate (eribulin) is indicated for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who have previously received at least two chemotherapies in the US and for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or MBC who have progressed after at least one chemotherapy in the European Union (EU). In both indications, prior therapy should include an anthracycline and a taxane in adjuvant or metastatic setting. Numerous studies evaluated eribulin in real-world (RW) breast cancer populations to reinforce its consistent effectiveness beyond registration randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported median overall survival (OS) of 13.1 and 15.9 months. In this systematic literature review (SLR), we summarize the cumulative evidence on eribulin's RW effectiveness in LABC/MBC.

METHODS

We searched through Medline/PubMed and Embase databases between 2012 and 2019 for articles reporting RW eribulin use in the second- or third-line or later LABC/MBC setting. Because eribulin showed greatest OS benefits in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) in RCTs, we also reviewed this tumor subtype. OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were the effectiveness outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Overall, 34 journal articles or abstracts met the selection criteria. Median OS ranged between 6.9 and 28.0 months; median PFS varied from 2.3 to 14.7 months. Eight studies reported OS outcomes for TNBC patients, and median OS ranged between 3.0 and 23.0 months.

CONCLUSION

The SLR showed high variability in OS and to a lesser extent in PFS associated with eribulin use in RW setting. Despite heterogeneity in line of use and patient subtypes, this SLR supports effectiveness of eribulin for LABC/MBC in clinical practice.

The relative effectiveness of eribulin for advanced breast cancer treatment: a study of the southeast Netherlands advanced breast cancer registry

Background: Eribulin provided significant overall survival (OS) benefit in heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer patients in the EMBRACE trial. We investigated the use of eribulin in daily clinical practice, the relative effectiveness of eribulin versus non-eribulin chemotherapy, and the safety of eribulin in real-world patients included in the SOutheast Netherlands Advanced BREast cancer (SONABRE) registry.Material and methods: Patients treated with eribulin and eligible patients for eribulin who received a different chemotherapy (i.e., non-eribulin group) in ten hospitals in 2013-2017 were included. A multivariate matching algorithm was applied to correct for differences in baseline characteristics between the groups, including the number of previous treatment lines. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS of eribulin were compared with the matched non-eribulin group through Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. The occurrence of dose delay and reduction was described.Results: Forty-five patients received eribulin according to its registration criteria and 74 patients were eligible for eribulin but received non-eribulin chemotherapy. Matching increased the similarity in baseline characteristics between the eribulin and non-eribulin groups. Median PFS was 3.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7-5.5) in the eribulin group and 3.2 months (95% CI: 2.0-4.8) in the matched non-eribulin group (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.83, 95% CI: 0.49-1.38). Median OS was 5.9 months (95% CI: 4.6-11.0) and 5.2 months (95% CI: 4.6-9.5) in the eribulin and non-eribulin groups, respectively (adjusted HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.38-1.13). Dose delay or reduction occurred in 14 patients (31%) receiving eribulin.Conclusions: No difference in PFS and OS was observed between eribulin and non-eribulin treated patients. Eribulin had a manageable toxicity profile.

Eribulin in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: Critic Interpretation of Current Evidence and Projection for Future Scenarios

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by distinctive biological features that confer an aggressive clinical behavior. In TNBC patients, the absence of well-defined driver pathways such as hormonal receptor expression or hyperactivation of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) significantly reduce the spectrum of therapeutic options, which are currently mainly confined to chemotherapy. Thus far, median overall survival for patients with metastatic TNBC is about 9-12 months with conventional cytotoxic agents. However, the heterogeneity recently revealed at a gene expression level inside the TNBC family may help inform therapeutic decisions concerning the use of chemotherapy and hopefully lead the way to novel targeted options that include immunotherapy. Eribulin, a halichondrin class antineoplastic drug, is currently recommended for treatment of HER2 negative metastatic or recurrent breast cancer (BC) previously exposed to anthracyclines and taxanes, also for patients with a TNBC. It is currently indicated from the second line of treatment. In this review, we aim to analyze a wide range of cumulated evidence on eribulin use in TNBC including preclinical studies, intervention and observational clinical trials. Data from the real-world setting and the emerging evidence increasingly substantiating the rationale for combinations with new generation treatment strategies, e.g., PARP-inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, will be also discussed.

Real-life activity of eribulin mesylate among metastatic breast cancer patients in the multicenter national observational ESME program

Eribulin mesylate (EM) was recently approved for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) chemotherapy (CT) in late lines by the FDA, with debated results in second line. We evaluated outcomes in breast cancer patients receiving EM as second, third and fourth line in a national real-life cohort of 16,703 consecutive MBC patients initiating their first metastatic therapeutic line between 2008 and 2014. Primary and secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). An imbalance was seen for HER2+ tumors and concomitant anti-HER2 targeted therapies use, we thus performed a subanalysis in HER2- patients. PFS and OS were significantly better in EM patients in third and fourth lines, compared to "Other chemotherapies" patients (PFS: 4.14 vs. 3.02 months, p = 0.0010; 3.61 vs. 2.53 months, p = 0.0102, third and fourth-line; OS: 11.27 vs. 7.65 months, p = 0.0001; 10.91 vs. 5.95 months, p < 0.0001, third and fourth-line). No significant difference was reported in second-line (PFS: 5.06 vs. 4.14 months, p = 0.1171; OS: 13.99 vs. 11.66 months, p = 0.151). Among HER2- patients, a significant difference was seen for all lines, including 2nd-line (PFS: 4.57 vs. 3.91 months, p = 0.0379; OS: 14.98 vs. 10.51 months, p = 0.0113). In this large real-world database, HER2-negative MBC patients receiving EM in second or later CT line presented significantly better PFS and OS. This difference disappeared in second line in the overall population, probably because of the imbalance in HER2-targeted treatments use. Our results mirror those of the published randomized trials. The effect of anti-HER2 therapies addition in this setting still needs to be defined.