1
|
Rodríguez-Gonzalez A, Carmona-Bayonas A, Hernandez San Gil R, Cruz-Castellanos P, Antoñanzas-Basa M, Lorente-Estelles D, Corral MJ, González-Moya M, Castillo-Trujillo OA, Esteban E, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Calderon C. Impact of systemic cancer treatment on quality of life and mental well-being: a comparative analysis of patients with localized and advanced cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:3492-3500. [PMID: 37247131 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03214-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study investigated the impact of systemic cancer therapy on the quality of life, mental well-being, and life satisfaction of cancer patients. METHODS This prospective study was promoted by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and enrolled patients with localized, resected, or unresectable advanced cancer from 15 Spanish medical oncology departments. Patients completed surveys on quality of life (EORTC-QoL-QLQ-C30), psychological distress (BSI-18) and life satisfaction (SWLS) before and after systemic cancer treatment. RESULTS The study involved 1807 patients, 944 (52%) having resected, localized cancer, and 863 with unresectable advanced cancer. The mean age was 60 years, and 53% were female. The most common types of localized cancer were colorectal (43%) and breast (38%), while bronchopulmonary (32%), non-colorectal digestive (23%), and colorectal (15%) were the most frequent among those with advanced cancer. Before systemic treatment, patients with advanced cancer had poorer scores than those with localized cancer on physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social limitations, symptoms, psychological distress, and life satisfaction (all p < 0.001), but there were no differences in financial hardship. Patients with localized cancer had greater life satisfaction and better mental well-being than those with advanced cancer before systemic treatment (p < 0.001). After treatment, patients with localized cancer experienced worsening of all scales, symptoms, and mental well-being (p < 0.001), while patients with advanced disease had a minor decline in quality of life. The impact on quality of life was greater on all dimensions except economic hardship and was independent of age, cancer location, and performance status in participants with resected disease after adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION In conclusion, our study highlights that systemic cancer treatment can improve quality of life in patients with advanced cancer, while adjuvant treatments for localized disease may have a negative impact on quality of life and psychological well-being. Therefore, treatment decisions should be carefully evaluated on an individual basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adán Rodríguez-Gonzalez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central of Asturias, ISPA, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Avenida de Roma S/N, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | - Alberto Carmona-Bayonas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
| | | | | | - Mónica Antoñanzas-Basa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - María Jose Corral
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Oscar Alfredo Castillo-Trujillo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central of Asturias, ISPA, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Avenida de Roma S/N, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | - Emilio Esteban
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central of Asturias, ISPA, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Avenida de Roma S/N, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | - Paula Jiménez-Fonseca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central of Asturias, ISPA, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Avenida de Roma S/N, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain.
| | - Caterina Calderon
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ghiglieri C, Dempster M, Wright S, Graham-Wisener L. Psychosocial functioning in individuals with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer: a mixed methods systematic review. BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:164. [PMID: 37891568 PMCID: PMC10612179 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01288-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oesophago-gastric cancer is an aggressive disease with a high rate of recurrence and mortality across the disease trajectory. Reduced psychosocial functioning has been evidenced amongst those with advanced disease, however little is known about the contributing factors. Determining these factors is an important clinical consideration to inform assessment and intervention. This review aimed to synthesise the available evidence on the psychosocial functioning of individuals with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer and their carers. METHODS A JBI mixed-methods systematic review. Four bibliographic databases, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, were searched. Quantitative and qualitative studies were screened for inclusion and critically appraised for methodological quality. Both types of data were extracted using JBI tools for mixed-methods systematic reviews. A convergent segregated approach to synthesis and integration was used. The findings of the synthesis have been configured according to JBI methodology. RESULTS A total of 12 studies were included in this review, including 6 quantitative studies and 6 qualitative studies. The quantitative results provide preliminary indication of several physical, biological, psychological and macro-level contextual factors associated with psychosocial functioning in this clinical population. The qualitative findings shed light on a range of physical, psychosocial, and existential challenges faced by advanced oesophago-gastric cancer patients. These multiple and often persistent challenges appear to cause considerable distress; however, patients describe the importance of maintaining a sense of normality and control over their illness and its effects. Patients value continuity and structure, however many report shortcomings when accessing care. No findings reporting the experiences from the perspective of carers were found, therefore all findings represent the perspective of the patient. CONCLUSIONS Further high-quality research is needed to understand how best to support and manage the palliative care needs of individuals living with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer. Implications for practice are discussed, suggesting that psychosocial interventions, complex symptom management and continuity of care could improve the psychosocial functioning of individuals in this setting. PRE-REGISTRATION The systematic review was pre-registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42020181273) and the protocol can be viewed on the OSF ( http://osf.io/exuzf ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara Ghiglieri
- Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland.
| | - Martin Dempster
- Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland
| | - Sam Wright
- Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland
| | - Lisa Graham-Wisener
- Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee EM, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Galán-Moral R, Coca-Membribes S, Fernández-Montes A, Sorribes E, García-Torralba E, Puntí-Brun L, Gil-Raga M, Cano-Cano J, Calderon C. Toxicities and Quality of Life during Cancer Treatment in Advanced Solid Tumors. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:9205-9216. [PMID: 37887565 PMCID: PMC10605504 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30100665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to identify subgroups of advanced cancer patients who experienced grade 3-4 toxicities as reported by their oncologists as well as identify the demographic, clinical, and treatment symptom characteristics as well as QoL outcomes associated with distinct profiles of each patient. A prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted with advanced cancer patients of 15 different hospitals across Spain. After three months of systemic cancer treatment, participants completed questionnaires that evaluated psychological distress (BSI-18), quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) and fatigue (FAS). The most common tumor sites for the 557 cancer patients with a mean age of 65 years were bronchopulmonary, digestive, and pancreas. Overall, 19% of patients experienced high-grade toxicities (grade 3-4) during treatment. Patients with recurrent advanced cancer, with non-adenocarcinoma cancer, undergoing chemotherapy, and a showing deteriorated baseline status (ECOG > 1) were more likely to experience higher toxicity. Patients who experienced grade 3-4 toxicities during cancer treatment had their treatment suspended in 59% of the cases. Additionally, 87% of the patients had a dose adjustment or a cycle delayed in their treatment due to a high risk of dying during treatment. Future research should focus on identifying interventions to reduce high-grade toxicities and improve quality of life in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Mi Lee
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paula Jiménez-Fonseca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, 33011 Oviedo, Spain
| | - Rocio Galán-Moral
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, 13005 Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara Coca-Membribes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, 38320 Tenerife, Spain
| | - Ana Fernández-Montes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, 32005 Ourense, Spain
| | - Elena Sorribes
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Laura Puntí-Brun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Consorcio Sanitario del Maresme, 08304 Mataró, Spain
| | - Mireia Gil-Raga
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, 46014 Valencia, Spain
| | - Juana Cano-Cano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, 13005 Madrid, Spain
| | - Caterina Calderon
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu X, Zhang W. Reminiscence therapy-based care program alleviates anxiety and depression, as well as improves the quality of life in recurrent gastric cancer patients. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1133470. [PMID: 37351436 PMCID: PMC10282646 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1133470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Reminiscence therapy is a non-drug method that eases psychological burden and enhances quality of life by memories and communications in cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate influence of reminiscence therapy-based care program on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in recurrent gastric cancer patients. Methods Totally, 96 recurrent gastric cancer patients were randomly assigned as 1:1 ratio into reminiscence therapy-based care group (N = 48) and usual care group (N = 48) to receive 12-week corresponding interventions. Besides, all patients were follow-up for 6 months. Results Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales-anxiety score at 4th month (p = 0.031) and 6th month (p = 0.004), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales-depression score at 6th month (p = 0.018), and anxiety severity at 4th month (p = 0.041) and 6th month (p = 0.037) were lower in reminiscence therapy-based care group than in usual care group. Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 global health status score at 2nd month (p = 0.048), 4th month (p = 0.036), and 6th month (p = 0.014), Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 function score at 4th month (p = 0.014) and 6th month (p = 0.021) were higher, while Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 symptoms score at 2nd month (p = 0.041) and 4th month (p = 0.035) were lower in reminiscence therapy-based care group than in usual care group. Furthermore, reminiscence therapy-based care was more effective on improving mental health and quality of life in recurrent gastric cancer patients with anxiety or depression at baseline than those without. Conclusion Reminiscence therapy-based care serves as an effective intervention, which relieves anxiety and depression, and improves quality of life in recurrent gastric cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xing Wu
- Department of General Surgery, HanDan Central Hospital, Handan, China
| | - Weiwei Zhang
- Department of Hematology, HanDan Central Hospital, Handan, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schütte K, Schulz C, Middelberg-Bisping K. Impact of gastric cancer treatment on quality of life of patients. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2021; 50-51:101727. [PMID: 33975681 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2021.101727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Treatment of gastric cancer is stage specific and ranges from endoscopic resections in early gastric cancer to gastrectomy and multimodal treatment in locally advanced tumour situations. Palliative systemic treatment has the potential to prolong survival in advanced tumour stages. However, tumour-directed therapies and their side-effects potentially worsen the general condition of a patient. Treatment discussions and decisions, especially when trading-off the options with the patient, have widened their focus from 'technical' terms like overall survival, disease-free survival and progression-free survival to patient reported outcomes (PROs) including quality of life (QoL). The assessment of PROs has evolved as important endpoint in clinical studies. A precise definition of QoL seems impossible. Its multiple dimensions can be evaluated by various validated questionnaires like the QLQ-C30 and FACT-G focusing on different priorities. Special additional tools have been developed and validated to assess QoL in gastric cancer patients (QLQ-STO22, FACT-Ga). We herein give an overview on the options to evaluate QoL in patients with gastric cancer and on published data on the impact of tumour-targeted therapy on QoL in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Schütte
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Niels-Stensen-Klinken Marienhospital Osnabrück, Germany.
| | - Christian Schulz
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Kristina Middelberg-Bisping
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Niels-Stensen-Klinken Marienhospital Osnabrück, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rupp SK, Stengel A. Influencing Factors and Effects of Treatment on Quality of Life in Patients With Gastric Cancer-A Systematic Review. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:656929. [PMID: 34276435 PMCID: PMC8280526 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.656929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. It is associated with several disease-related impairments contributing to the psycho-social burden of those patients, such as deterioration of well-being and overall quality of life (QOL). The aim of this study is to present the wide range of factors potentially impacting patients' overall well-being and possible preventive interventions. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in October 2020 with a search in the PubMed, MedLine, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar databases. We used the keywords "gastric cancer," "gastric neoplasm," and each of them combined with "quality of life," "depression," and "anxiety" to identify all relevant articles reporting about potential impact factors influencing the overall well-being of patients suffering from gastric cancer. Results: Finally, 125,490 articles were found, of which 125,431 were excluded in several steps of screening. Inclusion criteria were studies carried out on human ≥18 years of age, studies in English or German language, clinical trials, registry-based studies, cohort studies, population-based studies, and certain titles and abstracts. After screening for eligibility 35 potential factors influencing overall well-being in patients with GC were identified and classified into 9 important categories: genetic condition, treatment method, blood markers, nutritional status, daily living, state of health, mental state, supportive care, and alternative treatment. Conclusion: Since various factors are involved in the development of patients' overall well-being, timely treatment of psycho-social impairments by physicians and psychologists is of enormous importance. Preventing psycho-social burden by improving patients' QOL should be of high importance in the treatment regimen of patients with GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Kristina Rupp
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Section Psychooncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Department for Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee KW, Chung IJ, Ryu MH, Park YI, Nam BH, Oh HS, Lee KH, Han HS, Seo BG, Jo JC, Lee HR, Kim JW, Park SR, Cho SH, Kang YK. Multicenter phase III trial of S-1 and cisplatin versus S-1 and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SOPP trial). Gastric Cancer 2021; 24:156-167. [PMID: 32596783 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-020-01101-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In East Asia, S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) is one of the standard first-line chemotherapy regimens for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer (MRGC). Oxaliplatin is generally less toxic and more convenient to administer than cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a multicenter, phase III study assessing whether S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) was non-inferior/superior to SP in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with MRGC were randomized 1:1 to receive either SOX (S-1 80 mg/m2/day on days 1-14; oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1; every 3 weeks) or SP (S-1 80 mg/m2/day on days 1-14; cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1; every 3 weeks [SP3]). RESULTS Between October 2012 and October 2014, 338 patients were randomized. The median age was 56 years, and 51% of patients had measurable lesions. SOX was significantly non-inferior but not superior to SP3 in terms of PFS [median 5.6 versus 5.7 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.07]. In patients with measurable disease, objective response rates were similar between SOX and SP3 (58% versus 60%). Overall, the survival in both groups did not differ (median 12.9 versus 11.4 months; HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.66-1.11). Treatment was well tolerated in both arms. Anemia, leucopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and oral mucositis were more common with SP3. In contrast, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, and peripheral neuropathy were more common with SOX. CONCLUSIONS SOX was non-inferior to SP3. The two regimens were well tolerated with different toxicity profiles. The SOX regimen can be recommended as a first-line treatment for MRGC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01671449.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keun-Wook Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Ik-Joo Chung
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Republic of Korea
| | - Min-Hee Ryu
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Young Iee Park
- Center for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
| | - Byung-Ho Nam
- Department of Cancer Control and Policy, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
- HERINGS, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho-Suk Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Hee Lee
- Department of Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye Sook Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
| | - Bong-Gun Seo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Cheol Jo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo Rak Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Won Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Sook Ryun Park
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Hee Cho
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon-Koo Kang
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Effect of early tumor response on the health-related quality of life among patients on second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in the ABSOLUTE trial. Gastric Cancer 2021; 24:467-476. [PMID: 33136231 PMCID: PMC7902565 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-020-01131-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluated the association between early tumor response at 8 weeks, previously reported as a positive outcome prognosticator, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients enrolled in the ABSOLUTE trial. METHODS HRQOL was assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) utility index score in patients with complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) and progressive disease (PD) at 8 weeks, and time-to-deterioration (TtD) of the EQ-5D score, with the preset minimally important difference (MID) of 0.05, was compared between these populations. Among the enrolled patients, 143 and 160 patients were assessable in weekly solvent-based paclitaxel (Sb-PTX) arm and weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) arm, respectively. RESULTS Changes of the EQ-5D score from baseline to 8 weeks in the nab-PTX arm were 0.0009 and - 0.1229 in CR + PR and PD patients, respectively; the corresponding values for the Sb-PTX arm were - 0.0019 and - 0.1549. For both treatments, changes of the EQ-5D score from baseline at 8 weeks were significantly larger in patients with PD than in those with CR + PR. The median TtD was 3.9 and 2.2 months in patients with CR + PR and PD, respectively, for nab-PTX [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.595, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.358-0.989]. For Sb-PTX, the corresponding values were 4.7 and 2.0 months (HR = 0.494, 95% CI 0.291-0.841). CONCLUSIONS Early tumor shrinkage was associated with maintained HRQOL in AGC patients on the second-line chemotherapy with taxanes.
Collapse
|
9
|
Senthil M. Quality-of-Life Assessment in Patients Receiving Palliative Chemotherapy: Call for Action. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:7-8. [PMID: 33140253 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09297-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maheswari Senthil
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Park KB, Park JY, Lee SS, Chung HY, Kwon OK. Chronological changes in quality of life and body composition after gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res 2020; 98:262-269. [PMID: 32411631 PMCID: PMC7200603 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2020.98.5.262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We evaluated the changes in body composition (BC) and quality of life (QoL) in patients who underwent gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Methods BC data using segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and QoL data from the EORTC (European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer) gathered via QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22 questionnaires were obtained from 300 patients preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 3 years after surgery. In total, 114 patients underwent total gastrectomy (TG group) and 186 underwent distal gastrectomy (DG group). Results According to BC analysis, at 3 years postoperatively, the average body weight (P = 0.002), protein mass (P = 0.028), body fat mass (P = 0.009), skeletal muscle mass (P = 0.037), and visceral fat area (P = 0.012) was significantly decreased in the TG group than in the DG group compared to the preoperative. In the QLQ-C30, physical functioning (P = 0.001), role functioning (P = 0.013), and fatigue (P = 0.005) showed significantly worse QoL in the TG group than in the DG group at 2 and 3 years postoperatively. In the QLQ-STO22, pain (P = 0.001), reflux symptoms (P = 0.009), eating restrictions (P = 0.001), anxiety (P = 0.008), taste (P = 0.011), and body image (P = 0.014) showed greater continuous deterioration postoperatively in the TG group than in the DG group. Conclusion Persistent deterioration of BC and QoL is a serious concern following total gastrectomy. Long-term management of BC is required after gastrectomy and efforts should be made to improve the QoL in patients as soon as possible, postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ki Bum Park
- Gastric Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Park
- Gastric Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Seung Soo Lee
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.,Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Ho Young Chung
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.,Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Oh Kyoung Kwon
- Gastric Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Puhr HC, Pablik E, Berghoff AS, Jomrich G, Schoppmann SF, Preusser M, Ilhan-Mutlu A. Viennese risk prediction score for Advanced Gastroesophageal carcinoma based on Alarm Symptoms (VAGAS score): characterisation of alarm symptoms in advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer and its correlation with outcome. ESMO Open 2020; 5:e000623. [PMID: 32188713 PMCID: PMC7078766 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prognostic value of symptoms at disease presentation of advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer is unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to characterise these symptoms and correlate them with the outcome, so new prognostic markers can be defined. METHODS We analysed clinical data including symptoms, therapies and survival of patients with stage IV gastro-oesophageal cancer treated between 2002 and 2018 at the Vienna General Hospital, Austria. Initial symptoms as well as stenosis in endoscopy and HER2 positivity were evaluated in a cross-validation model to ascertain the impact of each variable on patient survival. RESULTS In total, 258 patients were evaluated. Five factors (stenosis in endoscopy, weight loss, HER2 positivity, dyspepsia, ulcer or active bleeding) have proven to be statistically relevant prognostic factors and were given a count of +1 and -1, if applicable. The resulting score ranges between -3 and +2. The survival probability for 180 days with a score of -3/-2, -1, 0, +1 and +2 is 90%, 80%, 73%, 72% and 42%, whereas for 2 years, it is 30%, 30%, 8%, 7% and 3%, respectively. The median overall survival of a score of -3/-2, -1, 0, +1 and +2 was 579 (95% CI 274 to not measurable), 481 (95% CI 358 to 637), 297 (95% CI 240 to 346), 284 (95% CI 205 to 371), 146 (95% CI 120 to 229) days, respectively. CONCLUSION The data from this retrospective study indicate that the Viennese risk prediction score for Advanced Gastroesophageal carcinoma based on Alarm Symptoms score provides independent prognostic information that may support clinical decision making at diagnosis of advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer. Our findings should be evaluated in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Christina Puhr
- Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Gastroesophageal Tumors Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria, Austria
| | - Eleonore Pablik
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | | | - Gerd Jomrich
- Gastroesophageal Tumors Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria, Austria
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Sebastian Friedrich Schoppmann
- Gastroesophageal Tumors Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria, Austria
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Gastroesophageal Tumors Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria, Austria
| | - Aysegül Ilhan-Mutlu
- Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Gastroesophageal Tumors Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria, Austria
| |
Collapse
|