Adjuvant Imatinib Treatment for 5-Years vs 3-Years in Patients with Ruptured Localized Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Retrospective Analysis

Is One Year Enough? Extended Adjuvant Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib for Chinese Patients With Resected Stage III Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Pathogenic BRAF mutations drive constitutive MAPK pathway activation in melanoma, and targeted therapies with dabrafenib plus trametinib have improved outcomes in the adjuvant setting. However, the optimal duration of adjuvant therapy remains unclear. This retrospective study examined whether extending dabrafenib plus trametinib beyond 1 year offers additional clinical benefit in Chinese patients with resected Stage III melanoma.

METHODS

Medical records from six centers were reviewed for adults with BRAF V600E/K-positive, completely resected Stage III melanoma who received at least 12 months of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib. Patients were divided into a 1-year therapy group and a more-than-1-year therapy group. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was the primary end point; adverse events were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 122 patients included, 77 received more than 1 year of adjuvant therapy. The more-than-1-year group experienced significantly better RFS (log-rank p = 0.04), and longer therapy independently reduced recurrence risk in multivariate analysis (HR, 2.42; p = 0.035). Adverse event profiles did not differ between groups, and toxicity-related treatment modifications occurred primarily within the first year.

CONCLUSIONS

Extending dabrafenib plus trametinib beyond 1 year may provide improved RFS without increasing toxicity. Further prospective trials are warranted to confirm the impact on overall survival and identify optimal patient subsets for prolonged therapy.

Next questions on gastrointestinal stromal tumors: unresolved challenges and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite remarkable progress in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), critical challenges persist. Key aspects such as risk stratification, the optimal duration of adjuvant therapy, and strategies to enhance the efficacy of first-line treatment remain subjects of ongoing debate. This review explores emerging concepts and innovative approaches aimed at refining patient selection and optimizing therapeutic decision-making to further improve clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Molecular and genomic parameters have the potential to enhance traditional risk models, enabling more precise stratification of high-risk patients. Innovations in artificial intelligence and liquid biopsy are emerging as powerful tools for refining predictions of recurrence and treatment response. Meanwhile, the definition and prognostic significance of tumor rupture remain pivotal challenges that influence both risk assessment and adjuvant therapy decisions. Furthermore, transcriptomic and multiomic analyses have unveiled distinct GIST subtypes with significant prognostic and therapeutic implications, paving the way for more tailored treatment strategies.

SUMMARY

Integrating molecular features into clinical decision making may refine risk assessment and personalize the treatment in patients with GIST. Future research should focus on validating these tools and redefine clinical trial designs to accelerate drug development for this rare disease.

Two Decades of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Management With First-Line Treatment: A Case Report

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare malignant tumors that arise from the connective tissues of the gastrointestinal tract. Reports about GISTs treated with imatinib for over five years are exceedingly rare. In this case report, we present a patient with GIST who remained alive for two decades after undergoing imatinib treatment. We describe a man in his forties with no significant prior medical issues, who presented in 2004 to the emergency department with severe abdominal pain. A computed tomography scan revealed a ruptured intra-abdominal mass. He underwent surgical resection, leading to the diagnosis of jejunal GIST. Following this, he underwent active surveillance until 2007, when the disease recurred. After completing a two-year course of imatinib, no signs of disease were detected, and medical therapy was stopped. However, in 2011, a pelvic recurrence was observed, leading to the re-introduction of imatinib therapy, which was maintained until 2018. A year later, disease progression was noted, prompting the re-initiation of imatinib. Since then, the patient was receiving imatinib therapy with good tolerance, until March of 2024. This case highlights the potential sensitivity of imatinib for a long duration.

Clinical importance of tumor rupture in gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Risk factors of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) include tumor size, location, mitosis, and tumor rupture. Although the first three are commonly recognized as independent prognostic factors, tumor rupture is not a consistent finding. Indeed, tumor rupture may be subjectively diagnosed and is rarely observed. Moreover, the criteria used for diagnosis differ among oncologists, which may result in inconsistent outcomes. Based on these conditions, a universal definition of tumor rupture was proposed in 2019 and consists of six scenarios: tumor fracture, blood-stained ascites, gastrointestinal perforation at the tumor site, histologically proven invasion, piecemeal resection, and open incisional biopsy. Although the definition is considered appropriate for selection of GISTs with worse prognostic outcomes, each scenario lacks a high level of evidence and there is yet no consensus for some, including histological invasion and incisional biopsy. It may be, however, important to have common criteria for clinical decision-making, which may facilitate reliability, external validity, and comparability of clinical studies in rare GISTs. After the definition, several retrospective reports indicated that even with adjuvant therapy, tumor rupture was associated with high recurrence rates and poor prognostic outcomes. The prognosis of patients with ruptured GISTs is improved by 5-year adjuvant therapy compared with 3-year therapy. Nevertheless, the universal definition requires further evidence, and prospective clinical studies based on the definition are warranted.

Survival of patients with ruptured gastrointestinal stromal tumour treated with adjuvant imatinib in a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with ruptured gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) have poor prognosis. Little information is available about how adjuvant imatinib influences survival.

METHODS

We explored recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with ruptured GIST who participated in a randomised trial (SSG XVIII/AIO), where 400 patients with high-risk GIST were allocated to adjuvant imatinib for either 1 year or 3 years after surgery. Of the 358 patients with confirmed localised GIST, 73 (20%) had rupture reported. The ruptures were classified retrospectively using the Oslo criteria.

RESULTS

Most ruptures were major, four reported ruptures were reclassified unruptured. The 69 patients with rupture had inferior RFS and OS compared with 289 patients with unruptured GIST (10-year RFS 21% vs. 55%, OS 59% vs. 78%, respectively). Three-year adjuvant imatinib did not significantly improve RFS or OS of the patients with rupture compared with 1-year treatment, but in the largest mutational subset with KIT exon 11 deletion/indel mutation OS was higher in the 3-year group than in the 1-year group (10-year OS 94% vs. 54%).

CONCLUSIONS

About one-fifth of ruptured GISTs treated with adjuvant imatinib did not recur during the first decade of follow-up. Relatively high OS rates were achieved despite rupture.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00116935.

Impact of tumour rupture risk on the oncological rationale for the surgical treatment choice of gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Tumour rupture of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) has been considered to be a remarkable risk factor because of its unfavourable impact on the oncological outcome. Although tumour rupture has not yet been included in the current tumor-node-metastasis classification of GISTs as a prognostic factor, it may change the natural history of a low-risk GIST to a high-risk GIST. Originally, tumour rupture was defined as the spillage or fracture of a tumour into a body cavity, but recently, new definitions have been proposed. These definitions distinguished from the prognostic point of view between the major defects of tumour integrity, which are considered tumour rupture, and the minor defects of tumour integrity, which are not considered tumour rupture. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that the risk of disease recurrence in R1 patients is largely modulated by the presence of tumour rupture. Therefore, after excluding tumour rupture, R1 may not be an unfavourable prognostic factor for GISTs. Additionally, after the standard adjuvant treatment of imatinib for GIST with rupture, a high recurrence rate persists. This review highlights the prognostic value of tumour rupture in GISTs and emphasizes the need to carefully take into account and minimize the risk of tumour rupture when choosing surgical strategies for GISTs.

Evaluation of Systemic Treatment Options for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgical treatment is recommended for the majority of localised GIST, while systemic treatment is the cornerstone of management for metastatic or unresectable disease. While a three-year regimen of imatinib is the standard of care in the adjuvant setting, there is no precise recommendation for the duration of neoadjuvant treatment, where imatinib is usually given between 4 and 12 months. Continuous treatment with imatinib at a dose of 400 mg once per day is recommended for most patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST in the first line. An exception is represented by patients with tumours harbouring the imatinib-insensitive PDGFRA D842V mutation who would be better treated with avapritinib. Targeted therapies are also recommended in the presence of NTRK rearrangements and BRAF mutations, although limited data are available. While an increase in the dose of imatinib to 800 mg is an option for the second line, sunitinib is usually considered the standard of care. Similar outcomes were reported for ripretinib in patients with tumours harbouring KIT exon 11 mutation, with significantly fewer side effects. Regorafenib and ripretinib are the standards of care in the third and fourth lines, respectively. The recent development of various systemic treatment options allows for a more personalised approach based on the molecular profile of the GIST, patient characteristics, and the profile of medications' adverse events. A multidisciplinary approach is paramount since combining systemic treatment with locoregional treatment options and supportive care is vital for long-term survival.

Development and validation of a prognostic model to predict the prognosis of patients with colorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A large international population-based cohort study

Background

Colorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), mesenchymal malignancy, only accounts for about 6% of GISTs, but prognosis is generally poor. Given the rarity of colorectal GISTs, the prognostic values of clinicopathological features in the patients remain unclear. Nomograms can provide a visual interface to help calculate the predicted probability of a patient meeting a specific clinical endpoint and communicate it to the patient.

Methods

We included a total of 448 patients with colorectal GISTs diagnosed between 2000 and 2019 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. For nomogram construction and validation, patients in the SEER database were divided randomly into the training cohort and internal validation cohort at a ratio of 7:3, while 44 patients with colorectal GISTs from our hospital patient data set between 2010 to 2016 served as the external validation cohort. The OS curves were drawn using the Kaplan–Meier method and assessed using the log-rank test. And, Fine and Gray’s competing-risks regression models were conducted to assess CSS. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to select prognostic factors for survival time and constructed a predictive nomogram based on the results of the multivariate analysis.

Results

Through univariate and multivariate analyses, it is found that age, primary site, SEER stage, surgery, and tumor size constitute significant risk factors for OS, and age, primary site, histological grade, SEER stage, American Joint Committee for Cancer (AJCC) stage, surgery, and tumor size constitute risk factors for CSS. We found that the nomogram provided a good assessment of OS and CSS at 1-, 3- and 5- year in patients with colorectal GISTs. The calibration plots for the training, internal validation and external validation cohorts at 1-, 3- and 5- year OS and CSS indicated that the predicted survival rates closely correspond to the actual survival rates.

Conclusion

We constructed and validated an unprecedented nomogram to predict OS and CSS in patients with colorectal GISTs. The nomogram had the potential as a clinically predictive tool for colorectal GISTs prognosis, and can be used as a potential, objective and additional tool for clinicians in predicting the prognosis of colorectal GISTs patients worldwide. Clinicians could wield the nomogram to accurately evaluate patients’ OS and CSS, identify high-risk patients, and provide a baseline to optimize treatment plans.

Prediction of recurrence-free survival and adjuvant therapy benefit in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on radiomics features

OBJECTIVE

Development and validation of a radiomics nomogram for predicting recurrence and adjuvant therapy benefit populations in high/intermediate-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) based on computed tomography (CT) radiomic features.

METHODS

Retrospectively collected from 2009.07 to 2015.09, 220 patients with pathological diagnosis of intermediate- and high-risk stratified gastrointestinal stromal tumors and received imatinib treatment were randomly divided into (6:4) training cohort and validation cohort. The 2D-tumor region of interest (ROI) was delineated from the portal-phase images on contrast-enhanced (CE) CT, and radiological features were extracted. The most valuable radiological features were obtained using a Lasso-Cox regression model. Integrated construction was conducted of nomograms of radiomics characteristics to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients receiving adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

Eight radiomic signatures were finally selected. The area under the curve (AUC) of the radiomics signature model for predicting 3-, 5-, and 7-year RFS in the training and validation cohorts (training cohort AUC = 0.80, 0.84, 0.76; validation cohort AUC = 0.78, 0.80, 0.76). The constructed radiomics nomogram was more accurate than the clinicopathological nomogram for predicting RFS in GIST (C-index: 0.864 95%CI, 0.817-0.911 vs. 0.733 95%CI, 0.675-0.791). Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed a greater benefit from adjuvant therapy in patients with high radiomics scores (training cohort: p < 0.0001; validation cohort: p = 0.017), while there was no significant difference in the low-score group (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In this study, a nomogram constructed based on preoperative CT radiomics features could be used for RFS prediction in high/intermediate-risk GISTs and assist the clinical decision-making for GIST patients.

Effect of gastric cancer screening on long-term survival of gastric cancer patients: results of Korean national cancer screening program

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is the most common cancer type in Korea. Korean National Cancer Screening Program (KNCSP) offer either upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) or upper endoscopy biennially for adults aged ≥ 40. This study aimed to investigate the effect of cancer screening program on the long-term survival among GC patients.

METHODS

A nationwide population-based cohort was constructed based on three national databases. Overall, 46,701 GC patients diagnosed in 2008 and 2009 were included in our final analysis, and they were followed-up until the end of 2019. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test. Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis was used to report the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 18,614/46,701 (39.9%) patients died during the median follow-up time of 10.5 years. The survival rate was higher among screened patients (65.8%) than never-screened patients (49.1%). Screened patients had 53% (HR, 0.47; 95% CI 0.45-0.48) lower risk of death from GC. The HRs of GC-specific mortality was lower in upper endoscopy group (HR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.34-0.37) compared with UGIS (HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.67-0.73). Screened patients within 2 years prior to cancer diagnosis had a 35% reduction in risk of GC death. The figure decline to approximately 19% among patients with interval time since last screening of > 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings emphasized the positive effects of GC screening on long-term GC patient survival. Also, patients screened by upper endoscopy or within 2 years before diagnosis had the best survival outcomes.

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with 3-year adjuvant imatinib

Three years of adjuvant imatinib is the current standard for patients with high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy profiles of 3-year imatinib, focusing on the prognostic value of various factors. In this registry-based study, 222 patients with high-risk GIST who underwent surgical resection followed by 3 years of adjuvant imatinib between 2010 and 2018 were included. The imatinib dose was reduced in 39 (17.6%), and 13 (5.9%) discontinued imatinib due to toxicity. With a median follow-up duration of 65.7 months, 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 73.2% and 93.9%, respectively. Tumor rupture, tumor size of > 10 cm, mitotic index of > 10/50 high power fields (HPF) were independent factors for short RFS. Patient subgroups stratified by the risk factors showed distinct RFS (P < 0.001): patients without the above risk factors or those with only a tumor size of >10 cm showed favorable RFS (5-year RFS 83.8% and 92.3%, respectively), whereas those with tumor rupture or those with tumor size of > 10 cm and mitotic index of >10/50 HPF showed prominently poor RFS (5-year RFS of 54.8% and 47.9%, respectively). Three years of adjuvant imatinib treatment was generally tolerable and effective, which were consistent with the clinical outcomes of previous reports. The presence of tumor rupture, large tumor, and high mitotic count was independently associated with poor RFS. Based on these risk factors, different management strategies, such as different durations of adjuvant imatinib, deserve further investigation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.