1
|
Valentine JL, Dengler A, Zhao A, Truong T, McAfee S, Hassanein M, Irvin SC, Chen J, Meng X, Yan H, Torri A, Sumner G, Andisik MD, Paccaly A, Partridge MA. Immunogenicity of Cemiplimab: Low Incidence of Antidrug Antibodies and Cut-Point Suitability Across Tumor Types. J Clin Pharmacol 2024; 64:125-136. [PMID: 37656820 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.2340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
The immunogenicity of cemiplimab, a fully human immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody directed against programmed cell death 1, was assessed in patients across multiple tumor types. The development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) against cemiplimab was monitored using a validated bridging immunoassay. To identify ADA-positive samples in the assay, statistically determined cut points were established by analyzing baseline clinical study samples from a mixed population of different tumor types, and this validation cut point was used to assess immunogenicity in all subsequent studies. Regulatory guidance requires that ADA assay cut points be verified for appropriateness in different patient populations. Thus, for the cemiplimab ADA assay, we evaluated whether each new oncology population was comparable with the validation population used to set the cut point. Assay responses from 2393 individual serum samples from 8 different tumor types were compared with the validation population, using established statistical methods for cut-point determination and comparison, with no significant differences observed. Across tumor types, the immunogenicity of cemiplimab was low, with an overall treatment-emergent ADA incidence rate of 1.9% and 2.5% at intravenous dose regimens of 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks and 350 mg every 3 weeks, respectively. Moreover, no neutralizing antibodies to cemiplimab were detected in patients with ADA-positive samples, and there was no observed impact of cemiplimab ADAs on pharmacokinetics. Study-specific cut points may be required in some diseases, such as immune and inflammatory diseases; however, based on this analysis, in-study cut points are not required for each new oncology disease indication for cemiplimab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny L Valentine
- Bioanalytical Sciences and Pharmacometrics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - Andrew Dengler
- Bioanalytical Sciences and Pharmacometrics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - An Zhao
- Bioanalytical Sciences and Pharmacometrics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - Tiffany Truong
- Bioanalytical Sciences and Pharmacometrics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - Sean McAfee
- Bioanalytical Sciences and Pharmacometrics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - Mohamed Hassanein
- Bioanalytical Sciences and Pharmacometrics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - Susan C Irvin
- Bioanalytical Sciences and Pharmacometrics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - Jihua Chen
- Bioanalytical Sciences and Pharmacometrics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - Xiao Meng
- Bioanalytical Sciences and Pharmacometrics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - Hong Yan
- Bioanalytical Sciences and Pharmacometrics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - Albert Torri
- Bioanalytical Sciences and Pharmacometrics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - Giane Sumner
- Bioanalytical Sciences and Pharmacometrics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - Matthew D Andisik
- Bioanalytical Sciences and Pharmacometrics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - Anne Paccaly
- Bioanalytical Sciences and Pharmacometrics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - Michael A Partridge
- Bioanalytical Sciences and Pharmacometrics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
2020 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: BAV Guidance, CLSI H62, Biotherapeutics Stability, Parallelism Testing, CyTOF and Regulatory Feedback ( Part 2A - Recommendations on Biotherapeutics Stability, PK LBA Regulated Bioanalysis, Biomarkers Assays, Cytometry Validation & Innovation Part 2B - Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Bioanalysis, Biomarkers, Immunogenicity, Gene & Cell Therapy and Vaccine). Bioanalysis 2021; 13:295-361. [PMID: 33511867 DOI: 10.4155/bio-2021-0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The 14th edition of the Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (14th WRIB) was held virtually on June 15-29, 2020 with an attendance of over 1000 representatives from pharmaceutical/biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations, and regulatory agencies worldwide. The 14th WRIB included three Main Workshops, seven Specialized Workshops that together spanned 11 days in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy and vaccine. Moreover, a comprehensive vaccine assays track; an enhanced cytometry track and updated Industry/Regulators consensus on BMV of biotherapeutics by LCMS were special features in 2020. As in previous years, this year's WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues. This 2020 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the Global Bioanalytical Community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2020 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication covers the recommendations on (Part 2A) BAV, PK LBA, Flow Cytometry Validation and Cytometry Innovation and (Part 2B) Regulatory Input. Part 1 (Innovation in Small Molecules, Hybrid LBA/LCMS & Regulated Bioanalysis), Part 3 (Vaccine, Gene/Cell Therapy, NAb Harmonization and Immunogenicity) are published in volume 13 of Bioanalysis, issues 4, and 6 (2021), respectively.
Collapse
|