Induction of cap-independent BiP (hsp-3) and Bcl-2 (ced-9) translation in response to eIF4G (IFG-1) depletion in C. elegans

Two eIF4E paralogs occupy separate germ granule messenger ribonucleoproteins that mediate mRNA repression and translational activation

We studied translation factor eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) paralogs that regulate germline mRNAs. Translational control of mRNAs is essential for germ cell differentiation and embryogenesis. Messenger ribonucleoprotein complexes assemble on mRNAs in the nucleus, as they exit via perinuclear germ granules, and in the cytoplasm. Bound messenger ribonucleoproteins including eIF4E exert both positive and negative posttranscriptional regulation. In Caenorhabditiselegans, germ granules are surprisingly dynamic messenger ribonucleoprotein condensates that remodel during development. Two eIF4E paralogs (IFE-1 and IFE-3), their cognate eIF4E-interacting proteins, and polyadenylated mRNAs are present in germ granules. Affinity purification of IFE-1 and IFE-3 messenger ribonucleoproteins allowed mass spectrometry and mRNA-Seq to identify other proteins and the mRNAs that populate stable eukaryotic initiation factor 4E complexes. We find translationally repressed mRNAs (e.g. pos-1, mex-3, spn-4, etc.) enriched with IFE-3, but excluded from IFE-1. Identified mRNAs overlap substantially with mRNAs previously described to be IFE-1 dependent for translation. The findings suggest that oocytes and embryos utilize the 2 eukaryotic initiation factor 4E paralogs for opposite purposes on critically regulated germline mRNAs. Sublocalization within adult perinuclear germ granules suggests an architecture in which Vasa/GLH-1, PGL-1, and the IFEs are stratified, which may facilitate sequential remodeling of messenger ribonucleoproteins leaving the nucleus. Biochemical composition of isolated messenger ribonucleoproteins indicates opposing yet cooperative roles for the 2 eukaryotic initiation factor 4E paralogs. We propose that the IFEs accompany controlled mRNAs in the repressed or activated state during transit to the cytoplasm. Copurification of IFE-1 with IFE-3 suggests they may interact to move repressed mRNAs to ribosomes.

The lim-7p::ced-1::GFP transgene from the MD701 strain increases embryonic lethality in C. elegans

The lim-7p::ced-1::GFP transgene has been widely used for evaluating germline apoptosis in C. elegans . Here we observed an increase in embryonic lethality in the MD701 strain that contains the lim-7p::ced-1::GFP transgene and a strain that outcrossed the lim-7p::ced-1::GFP transgene into the N2 wild-type strain. While the outcrossed strain had a significantly lower level of embryonic lethality than MD701, it still showed significantly higher embryonic lethality than wild type. Our results suggest that the presence of the lim-7p::ced-1::GFP transgene significantly increases embryonic lethality, but there may also be a secondary mutation in the MD701 strain that further increases embryonic lethality.

SKN-1 activation during infection of Caenorhabditis elegans requires CDC-48 and endoplasmic reticulum proteostasis

During challenge of Caenorhabditis elegans with human bacterial pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus faecalis, the elicited host response can be damaging if not properly controlled. The activation of Nrf (nuclear factor erythroid-related factor)/CNC (Cap-n-collar) transcriptional regulators modulates the response by upregulating genes that neutralize damaging molecules and promote repair processes. Activation of the C. elegans Nrf ortholog, SKN-1, is tightly controlled by a myriad of regulatory mechanisms, but a central feature is an activating phosphorylation accomplished by the p38 mitogen-activated kinase (MAPK) cascade. In this work, loss of CDC-48, an AAA+ ATPase, was observed to severely compromise SKN-1 activation on pathogen and we sought to understand the mechanism. CDC-48 is part of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated degradation (ERAD) complex where it functions as a remodeling chaperone enabling the translocation of proteins from the ER to the cytoplasm for degradation by the proteosome. Interestingly, one of the proteins retrotranslocated by ERAD, a process necessary for its activation, is SKN-1A, the ER isoform of SKN-1. However, we discovered that SKN-1A is not activated by pathogen exposure in marked contrast to the cytoplasmic-associated isoform SKN-1C. Rather, loss of CDC-48 blocks the antioxidant response normally orchestrated by SKN-1C by strongly inducing the unfolded protein response (UPRER). The data are consistent with the model of these 2 pathways being mutually inhibitory and support the emerging paradigm in the field of coordinated cooperation between different stress responses.

Endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response transcriptional targets of XBP-1s mediate rescue from tauopathy

Pathological tau disrupts protein homeostasis (proteostasis) within neurons in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related disorders. We previously showed constitutive activation of the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response (UPRER) transcription factor XBP-1s rescues tauopathy-related proteostatic disruption in a tau transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) model of human tauopathy. XBP-1s promotes clearance of pathological tau, and loss of function of the ATF-6 branch of the UPRER prevents XBP-1s rescue of tauopathy in C. elegans. We conducted transcriptomic analysis of tau transgenic and xbp-1s transgenic C. elegans and found 116 putative target genes significantly upregulated by constitutively active XBP-1s. Among these were five candidate XBP-1s target genes with human orthologs and a previously known association with ATF6 (csp-1, dnj-28, hsp-4, ckb-2, and lipl-3). We examined the functional involvement of these targets in XBP-1s-mediated tauopathy suppression and found loss of function in any one of these genes completely disrupts XBP-1s suppression of tauopathy. Further, we demonstrate upregulation of HSP-4, C. elegans BiP, partially rescues tauopathy independent of other changes in the transcriptional network. Understanding how the UPRER modulates pathological tau accumulation will inform neurodegenerative disease mechanisms and direct further study in mammalian systems with the long-term goal of identifying therapeutic targets in human tauopathies.

Two germ granule eIF4E isoforms reside in different mRNPs to hand off C elegans mRNAs from translational repression to activation

We studied the function of translation factor eIF4E isoforms in regulating mRNAs in germ cell granules/condensates. Translational control of mRNAs plays an essential role in germ cell gene regulation. Messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) complexes assemble on mRNAs as they move from the nucleus into perinuclear germ granules to exert both positive and negative post-transcriptional regulation in the cytoplasm. In C. elegans , germ granules are surprisingly dynamic mRNP condensates that remodel during development. Two eIF4E isoforms (called IFE-1 and IFE-3), eIF4E-Interacting Proteins (4EIPs), RBPs, DEAD-box helicases, polyadenylated mRNAs, Argonautes and miRNAs all occupy positions in germ granules. Affinity purification of IFE-1 and IFE-3 allowed mass spectrometry and mRNA-Seq to identify the proteins and mRNAs that populate stable eIF4E mRNPs. We find translationally controlled mRNAs (e.g. pos-1, mex-3, spn-4, etc.) enriched in IFE-3 mRNPs, but excluded from IFE-1 mRNPs. These mRNAs also require IFE-1 for efficient translation. The findings support a model in which oocytes and embryos utilize the two eIF4Es for opposite purposes on critically regulated germline mRNAs. Careful colocalization of the eIF4Es with other germ granule components suggests an architecture in which GLH-1, PGL-1 and the IFEs are stratified to facilitate sequential interactions for mRNAs. Biochemical characterization demonstrates opposing yet cooperative roles for IFE-3 and IFE-1 to hand-off of translationally controlled mRNAs from the repressed to the activated state, respectively. The model involves eIF4E mRNPs shuttling mRNAs through nuclear pore-associated granules/condensates to cytoplasmic ribosomes.

Toxicity of Three Optical Brighteners: Potential Pharmacological Targets and Effects on Caenorhabditis elegans

Optical brighteners (OBs) have become an integral part of our daily lives and culture, with a growing number of applications in various fields. Most industrially produced OBs are derived from stilbene, which has been found in environmental matrices. The main objectives for this work are as follows: first, to identify protein targets for DAST, FB-28, and FB-71, and second, to assess their effects in some behaviors physiologic of Caenorhabditis elegans. To achieve the first objective, each OB was tested against a total of 844 human proteins through molecular docking using AutoDock Vina, and affinities were employed as the main criteria to identify potential target proteins for the OB. Molecular dynamics simulations took and validated the best 25 docking results from two protein databases. The highest affinity was obtained for the Hsp70-1/DAST, CD40 ligand/FB-71, and CD40 ligand/FB-28 complexes. The possible toxic effects that OBs could cause were evaluated using the nematode C. elegans. The lethality, body length, locomotion, and reproduction were investigated in larval stage L1 or L4 of the wild-type strain N2. In addition, transgenic green fluorescent protein (GFP) strains were employed to estimate changes in relative gene expression. The effects on the inhibition of growth, locomotion, and reproduction of C. elegans nematodes exposed to DAST, FB-71, and FB-28 OBs were more noticeable with respect to lethality. Moreover, an interesting aspect in OB was increased the expression of gpx-4 and sod-4 genes associated with oxidative stress indicating a toxic response related to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). In all cases, a clear concentration-response relationship was observed. It is of special attention that the use of OBs is increasing, and their different sources, such as detergents, textiles, plastics, and paper products, must also be investigated to characterize the primary emissions of OBs to the environment and to develop an adequate regulatory framework.

Proteostasis is differentially modulated by inhibition of translation initiation or elongation

Recent work has revealed an increasingly important role for mRNA translation in maintaining proteostasis. Here, we use chemical inhibitors targeting discrete steps of translation to compare how lowering the concentration of all or only translation initiation-dependent proteins rescues Caenorhabditis elegans from proteotoxic stress. We systematically challenge proteostasis and show that pharmacologically inhibiting translation initiation or elongation elicits a distinct protective profile. Inhibiting elongation protects from heat and proteasome dysfunction independently from HSF-1 but does not protect from age-associated protein aggregation. Conversely, inhibition of initiation protects from heat and age-associated protein aggregation and increases lifespan, dependent on hsf-1, but does not protect from proteotoxicity caused by proteasome dysfunction. Surprisingly, we find that the ability of the translation initiation machinery to control the concentration of newly synthesized proteins depends on HSF-1. Inhibition of translation initiation in wild-type animals reduces the concentration of newly synthesized proteins but increases it in hsf-1 mutants. Our findings suggest that the HSF-1 pathway is not only a downstream target of translation but also directly cooperates with the translation initiation machinery to control the concentration of newly synthesized proteins to restore proteostasis.

Regulation of Germ Cell mRNPs by eIF4E:4EIP Complexes: Multiple Mechanisms, One Goal

Translational regulation of mRNAs is critically important for proper gene expression in germ cells, gametes, and embryos. The ability of the nucleus to control gene expression in these systems may be limited due to spatial or temporal constraints, as well as the breadth of gene products they express to prepare for the rapid animal development that follows. During development germ granules are hubs of post-transcriptional regulation of mRNAs. They assemble and remodel messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) complexes for translational repression or activation. Recently, mRNPs have been appreciated as discrete regulatory units, whose function is dictated by the many positive and negative acting factors within the complex. Repressed mRNPs must be activated for translation on ribosomes to introduce novel proteins into germ cells. The binding of eIF4E to interacting proteins (4EIPs) that sequester it represents a node that controls many aspects of mRNP fate including localization, stability, poly(A) elongation, deadenylation, and translational activation/repression. Furthermore, plants and animals have evolved to express multiple functionally distinct eIF4E and 4EIP variants within germ cells, giving rise to different modes of translational regulation.

IRES Trans-Acting Factors, Key Actors of the Stress Response

The cellular stress response corresponds to the molecular changes that a cell undergoes in response to various environmental stimuli. It induces drastic changes in the regulation of gene expression at transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels. Actually, translation is strongly affected with a blockade of the classical cap-dependent mechanism, whereas alternative mechanisms are activated to support the translation of specific mRNAs. A major mechanism involved in stress-activated translation is the internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-driven initiation. IRESs, first discovered in viral mRNAs, are present in cellular mRNAs coding for master regulators of cell responses, whose expression must be tightly controlled. IRESs allow the translation of these mRNAs in response to different stresses, including DNA damage, amino-acid starvation, hypoxia or endoplasmic reticulum stress, as well as to physiological stimuli such as cell differentiation or synapse network formation. Most IRESs are regulated by IRES trans-acting factor (ITAFs), exerting their action by at least nine different mechanisms. This review presents the history of viral and cellular IRES discovery as well as an update of the reported ITAFs regulating cellular mRNA translation and of their different mechanisms of action. The impact of ITAFs on the coordinated expression of mRNA families and consequences in cell physiology and diseases are also highlighted.

Cap-Independent mRNA Translation in Germ Cells

Cellular mRNAs in plants and animals have a 5'-cap structure that is accepted as the recognition point to initiate translation by ribosomes. Consequently, it was long assumed that the translation initiation apparatus was built solely for a cap-dependent (CD) mechanism. Exceptions that emerged invoke structural damage (proteolytic cleavage) to eukaryotic initiation factor 4 (eIF4) factors that disable cap recognition. The residual eIF4 complex is thought to be crippled, but capable of cap-independent (CI) translation to recruit viral or death-associated mRNAs begrudgingly when cells are in great distress. However, situations where CI translation coexists with CD translation are now known. In such cases, CI translation is still a minor mechanism in the major background of CD synthesis. In this review, I propose that germ cells do not fit this mold. Using observations from various animal models of oogenesis and spermatogenesis, I suggest that CI translation is a robust partner to CD translation to carry out the translational control that is so prevalent in germ cell development. Evidence suggests that CI translation provides surveillance of germ cell homeostasis, while CD translation governs the regulated protein synthesis that ushers these meiotic cells through the remarkable steps in sperm/oocyte differentiation.

Positive mRNA Translational Control in Germ Cells by Initiation Factor Selectivity

Ultimately, the production of new proteins in undetermined cells pushes them to new fates. Other proteins hold a stem cell in a mode of self-renewal. In germ cells, these decision-making proteins are produced largely from translational control of preexisting mRNAs. To date, all of the regulation has been attributed to RNA binding proteins (RBPs) that repress mRNAs in many models of germ cell development (Drosophila, mouse, C. elegans, and Xenopus). In this review, we focus on the selective, positive function of translation initiation factors eIF4E and eIF4G, which recruit mRNAs to ribosomes upon derepression. Evidence now shows that the two events are not separate but rather are coordinated through composite complexes of repressors and germ cell isoforms of eIF4 factors. Strikingly, the initiation factor isoforms are themselves mRNA selective. The mRNP complexes of translation factors and RBPs are built on specific populations of mRNAs to prime them for subsequent translation initiation. Simple rearrangement of the partners causes a dormant mRNP to become synthetically active in germ cells when and where they are required to support gametogenesis.