Does Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and/or Cholecystectomy Reduce Recurrence Rate of Acute Biliary Pancreatitis?

Comparison of Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics of Acute Pancreatitis Between Cholecystectomy and Non-cholecystectomy Patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of acute pancreatitis (AP) between patients with cholecystectomy and non-cholecystectomy and to validate the effect of prior cholecystectomy on the severity of subsequent pancreatitis.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 384 inpatients with AP at our hospital from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2023. Based on their history of cholecystectomy, the patients were split into cholecystectomy and non-cholecystectomy groups. propensity score matching was applied, considering age and sex, in a 1:3 ratio. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and CT/MRI parameters of each group were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 200 (52.1%) males and 184 (47.9%) females, with a mean age of 53.55 ± 13.86 years (range: 18-98 y). Ninety-six patients were in the cholecystectomy group that had previously undergone cholecystectomy, and 288 in the non-cholecystectomy group. Creatinine and C-reactive protein levels were lower in the patients with cholecystectomy than in patients with non-cholecystectomy (P1 = 0.001, P2 = 0.049). In the prevalence of biliary pancreatitis, the cholecystectomy patients are 27.1%, whereas the non-cholecystectomy patients are 45.8% (P = 0.005). The non-cholecystectomy patients had a significantly higher mean CT/MRI severity index score (3.57 ± 1.72 points) than the cholecystectomy group (3.00 ± 1.58 points; P < 0.001). Regarding local complications, In the groups that underwent cholecystectomy and those that did not, the prevalence of acute peripancreatic fluid collection was 40.4% and 21.9%, respectively. (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

AP following cholecystectomy exhibits unique imaging characteristics. Cholecystectomy reduces the severity and acute peripancreatic fluid collection rate of subsequent pancreatitis on CT/MRI.

Incidence of recurrent and chronic pancreatitis after acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Acute pancreatitis (AP) has a high incidence, and patients can develop recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) after AP.

Objectives

We aimed to estimate the pooled incidence rates (IRs), cumulative incidences, and proportions of RAP and CP after AP.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the proportion of RAP and CP after AP.

Data sources and methods

The systematic search was conducted in three (PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) databases on 19 December 2023. Articles reporting the proportion of RAP or CP in patients after the first and multiple episodes of AP were eligible. The random effects model was used to calculate the pooled IR with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The I 2 value assessed heterogeneity. The risk of bias assessment was conducted with the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool.

Results

We included 119 articles in the quantitative synthesis and 29 in the IRs calculations. Our results showed that the IR of RAP in adult patients after AP was 5.26 per 100 person-years (CI: 3.99-6.94; I 2 = 93%), while in children, it was 4.64 per 100 person-years (CI: 2.73-7.87; I 2 = 88%). We also found that the IR of CP after AP was 1.4 per 100 person-years (CI: 0.9-2; I 2 = 75%), while after RAP, it increased to 4.3 per 100 person-years (CI: 3.1-6.0; I 2 = 76%). The risk of bias was moderate in the majority of the included studies.

Conclusion

Our results showed that RAP affects many patients with AP. Compared to patients with the first AP episode, RAP leads to a threefold higher IR for developing CP.

Trial registration

Our protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021283252).

Cholecystectomy reduces the severity of subsequent idiopathic acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common digestive system disease, and its incidence is increasing year by year. Although some clinical studies have indicated that cholecystectomy can reduce the risk of recurrent pancreatitis after acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP), it is not clear whether cholecystectomy would affect the severity of subsequent AP.

METHODS

In this study, we combined computed tomography scoring index (CTSI), bedside index for severity in AP (BISAP), and clinical manifestations grading of AP with propensity score matching (PSM), after correction for baseline confounding factors, to respectively explore the influence of cholecystectomy on the severity of subsequent pancreatitis in 527 AP patients.

RESULTS

The results showed that ABP (231/527) is more common in female patients and elderly patients (P < 0.001). Age, amylase, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and aspartate aminotransferase levels of patients with ABP at admission were higher than those of non-biliary pancreatitis (296/527), and the levels of albumin, hematocrit, and blood glucose were lower (P < 0.050). Further, compared with the unresected group (458/527), patients after cholecystectomy (69/527) had less white blood cells and higher level of albumin (P < 0.050). Patients had lower clinical manifestation grade (P = 0.019) and CTSI grade (P < 0.008) after cholecystectomy. After PSM correction, there was no difference in biochemical parameters between the cholecystectomy group and the non-cholecystectomy group, but differences in clinical manifestation grade (P = 0.039) and CTSI grade (P = 0.013) remained. We also found that cholecystectomy reduced the frequency of biliary pancreatitis (30.4% vs. 45.9%, P < 0.050). Finally, we found that cholecystectomy could reduce the severity of subsequent idiopathic AP.

CONCLUSION

Cholecystectomy could reduce the severity of subsequent idiopathic AP and the frequency of biliary pancreatitis.

National recurrence of pancreatitis and readmissions after biliary pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

National and international guidelines support early cholecystectomy after mild gallstone pancreatitis but a recent nationwide study suggested these recommendations are not universally followed. Our study sought to quantify the national utilization of same hospitalization cholecystectomy versus non-operative management (NOM) and its association with pancreatitis recurrence, readmissions, and costs after mild gallstone pancreatitis (GP).

METHODS

Adult patients admitted with mild GP were identified from the Nationwide Readmission Database 2010-2015. Primary outcomes included the rate of cholecystectomy during the index admission as well as pancreatitis recurrence and readmission at 30 and 180 days (30d, 180d) comparing NOM to same hospitalization cholecystectomy. Mortality upon readmission, total length of stay (LOS), and total costs (combined index-readmission hospital costs) were also explored. Cox proportional hazards regression and generalized linear models controlled for patient/hospital confounders.

RESULTS

Among the 65,067 patients identified, 30% underwent cholecystectomy. The NOM cohort was older (58 vs. 50 years), had more comorbidities (Charlson index > 2, 23.5% vs. 11.5%), fewer female patients (56.7% vs. 67%) and less discharge-to-home (84.9% vs. 94.4%) (all p < 0.001). NOM was associated with increase in recurrence and unplanned readmissions at 30d [Hazard Ratio 3.53 (95% CI 2.92-4.27), 2.41 (2.11-2.74), respectively], and 180d [4.27 (3.65-4.98), 2.78 (2.54-3.04), respectively], as well as increased mortality during 180d readmission 1.88 (1.06-3.35). This approach was also associated with significant increase in LOS [predicted mean difference 2.79 days (95% CI 2.46-3.12)] and total costs [$2507.89 ($1714.4-$3301.4)].

CONCLUSIONS

In the USA, most patients presenting with mild GP do not undergo same hospitalization cholecystectomy. This strategy results in higher recurrent pancreatitis, mortality during readmission, and an additional $4.85 M/year in hospital costs nationwide. These data support same hospitalization cholecystectomy as the gold standard for mild GP.

Trends in same-admission cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for acute gallstone pancreatitis: A nationwide analysis across a decade

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Gallstones are the leading cause of acute pancreatitis in developed countries. National and international guidelines recommend that a cholecystectomy should be performed during the index hospitalization for acute gallstone pancreatitis. We aimed to delineate the national trends for same-admission cholecystectomy and ERCP for acute gallstone pancreatitis over the last ten years.

METHODS

We used the 2004, 2009 and 2014 National Inpatient Sample database including patients with a principal diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and a secondary diagnosis of choledocholithiasis or cholelithiasis. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years and elective admission. Primary outcome was the trend in incidence rate of same admission cholecystectomy from 2004 to 2014. The secondary outcomes were: 10-year trend in 1) Incidence of gallstone pancreatitis, 2) proportion of gallstone pancreatitis compared to all other etiologies of acute pancreatitis, 3) incidence rate of same-admission ERCP, 4) length of hospital stay, and 5) total hospitalization costs and charges.

RESULTS

The proportion of admissions during which a same-admission cholecystectomy was performed decreased from 48.7% in 2004 to 46.9% in 2009 to 45% in 2014 (trend p < 0.01). During the same time interval, the percentage of admissions during which an ERCP was performed decreased from 25.1% to 18.7% (Trend p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to the guidelines for same-admission cholecystectomy for patients admitted with acute gallstone pancreatitis have been declining over the past decade. On the other hand, decline in rate of ERCP in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis and no signs of cholangitis demonstrates adherence to guidelines in this regard.

Risk factors for chronic and recurrent pancreatitis after first attack of acute pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

To study the outcome of acute pancreatitis and risk factors for recurrent and chronic pancreatitis in a population based cohort of patients with first-time acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

All patients with first-time acute pancreatitis from 2006-2015 in Iceland were retrospectively evaluated. Medical records were scrutinized and relevant data extracted.

RESULTS

1102 cases of first-time acute pancreatitis were identified: mean age 56yr, 46% female, 41% biliary, 21% alcohol, 26% idiopathic, 13% other causes, mean follow-up 4yr. 21% had ≥1 recurrent acute pancreatitis which was independently related to alcoholic (vs. biliary hazard ratio (HR) 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51-3.46), male gender (HR 1.48, 95%CI 1.08-2.04), and smoking (HR 1.62, 95%CI 1.15-2.28). 3.7% developed chronic pancreatitis. Independent predictors were recurrent acute pancreatitis (HR 8.79, 95%CI 3.94-19.62), alcoholic (vs. biliary HR 9.16, 95%CI 2.71-30.9), local complications (HR 4.77, 95%CI 1.93-11.79), and organ-failure (HR 2.86, 95%CI 1.10-7.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent acute pancreatitis occurred in one-fifth of patients. Development of chronic pancreatitis was infrequent. Both recurrent acute pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis were related to alcoholic acute pancreatitis, while recurrent acute pancreatitis was associated with smoking and male gender, and chronic pancreatitis to recurrent acute pancreatitis, organ-failure, and local complications.

Acute recurrent pancreatitis and hyperlipidemia: Reciprocal causal relationship and clinical features

AIM

To investigate the influence of serum levels of lipids on the occurrence, development and prognosis of acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) to discuss the reciprocal causal relationship between ARP and hyperlipidemia (HL) and their clinical features.

METHODS

Clinical data and follow-up information for 121 patients with ARP who were treated at the First Hospital of China Medical University from January 2013 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. All these patients were divided into a hyperlipidemia group (HL group) and a non-hyperlipidemia group (non-HL group) according to the serum lipid levels within 24 h after admission. General data, severity, recrudescence, complications, operation rate, and mortality were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The average age was significantly lower in the HL group than in the non-HL group (38.5 ± 8.9 vs 49.8 ± 13.2, P < 0.01). The operation rate was significantly lower (11.3% vs 21.9%, P < 0.05) and the proportion of male patients was significantly higher (41/53 vs 40/68, P < 0.05) in the HL group. BMI (28.2 ± 6.0 vs 22.5 ± 5.2, P < 0.01), serum levels of glucose (9.65 ± 6.00 vs 6.88 ± 3.26, P < 0.01) and lipids (13.94 ± 8.91 vs 3.22 ± 1.47, P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the HL group than in the non-HL group, while serum amylase was significantly lower in the HL group (332.02 ± 246.71 vs 490.79 ± 417.11, P < 0.05). The HL group was more frequently complicated with diabetes (34.0% vs 13.2%, P < 0.01) and fatty liver (22.6% vs 7.4%, P < 0.05). For the causes of ARP, elevated serum lipid levels in the observation group were mainly caused by primary HL itself (62.3%, P < 0.01), and HL appeared as a concomitant symptom in other ARP patients induced by other factors. In the non-HL group, ARP was predominantly caused by gallstones (66.1%, P < 0.01). There was no statistical difference about alcoholic pathogenesis, severity or prognosis of disease between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

There is a reciprocal causal relationship between HL and ARP. High serum lipid levels in the observation group are mainly related to the primary HL itself. The ARP patients with concomitant HL tend to be younger, be male, have lower surgical intervention rate, and be easily complicated with diabetes or fatty liver.