1
|
Arana-Chicas E, Kioumarsi A, Carroll-Scott A, Massey PM, Klassen AC, Yudell M. Barriers and facilitators to mammography among women with intellectual disabilities: a qualitative approach. DISABILITY & SOCIETY 2019; 35:1290-1314. [PMID: 34408338 PMCID: PMC8370097 DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2019.1680348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Although women with intellectual disabilities have the same breast cancer incidence rate as women without intellectual disabilities, they have fewer mammograms and higher mortality rates. Qualitative inquiry was employed to explore barriers and facilitators to mammography among this population. In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 30 women with intellectual disabilities and their caregivers in Philadelphia during 2015-2016. Thematic analysis was conducted using inductive and deductive coding. While results provide further evidence for prior research on barriers to mammography among women with intellectual disabilities (e.g. being unprepared, fear of the exam), this study generated novel barriers such as lack of breast ultrasound awareness, sedation failing to work, and lack of mammogram education in adult day programs, and novel facilitators such as extended family support and positive attitudes. Results support the need to address barriers and promote facilitators to improve the breast cancer screening experience among women with intellectual disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn Arana-Chicas
- Cancer Disparities Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Avat Kioumarsi
- Dornsife School of Public Health, Community Health and Prevention, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amy Carroll-Scott
- Dornsife School of Public Health, Community Health and Prevention, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Philip M. Massey
- Dornsife School of Public Health, Community Health and Prevention, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ann C. Klassen
- Dornsife School of Public Health, Community Health and Prevention, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael Yudell
- Dornsife School of Public Health, Community Health and Prevention, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Scheel JR, Tillack AA, Mercer L, Coronado GD, Beresford SAA, Molina Y, Thompson B. Mobile Versus Fixed Facility: Latinas' Attitudes and Preferences for Obtaining a Mammogram. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15:19-28. [PMID: 29055611 PMCID: PMC5756515 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Revised: 08/27/2017] [Accepted: 08/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Mobile mammographic services have been proposed as a way to reduce Latinas' disproportionate late-stage presentation compared with white women by increasing their access to mammography. The aims of this study were to assess why Latinas may not use mobile mammographic services and to explore their preferences after using these services. METHODS Using a mixed-methods approach, a secondary analysis was conducted of baseline survey data (n = 538) from a randomized controlled trial to improve screening mammography rates among Latinas in Washington. Descriptive statistics and bivariate regression were used to characterize mammography location preferences and to test for associations with sociodemographic indices, health care access, and perceived breast cancer risk and beliefs. On the basis of these findings, a qualitative study (n = 18) was used to explore changes in perceptions after using mobile mammographic services. RESULTS More Latinas preferred obtaining a mammogram at a fixed facility (52.3% [n = 276]) compared with having no preference (46.3% [n = 249]) and preferring mobile mammographic services (1.7% [n = 9]). Concerns about privacy and comfort (15.6% [n = 84]) and about general quality (10.6% [n = 57]) were common reasons for preferring a fixed facility. Those with no history of mammography preferred a fixed facility (P < .05). In the qualitative study, Latinas expressed similar initial concerns but became positive toward the mobile mammographic services after obtaining a mammogram. CONCLUSIONS Although most Latinas preferred obtaining a mammogram at a fixed facility, positive experiences with mobile mammography services changed their attitudes toward them. These findings highlight the need to include community education when using mobile mammographic service to increase screening mammography rates in underserved communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John R Scheel
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Allison A Tillack
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | - Yamile Molina
- Community Health Sciences Division, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Beti Thompson
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fowler B, Samadder NJ, Kepka D, Ding Q, Pappas L, Kirchhoff AC. Improvements in Colorectal Cancer Incidence Not Experienced by Nonmetropolitan Women: A Population-Based Study From Utah. J Rural Health 2017; 34:155-161. [PMID: 28426915 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2016] [Revised: 12/01/2016] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Little is known about disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality by community-level factors such as metropolitan status. METHODS This analysis utilized data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from Utah. We included patients diagnosed with CRC from 1991 to 2010. To determine whether associations existed between metropolitan/nonmetropolitan county of residence and CRC incidence, Poisson regression models were used. CRC mortality was assessed using multivariable Cox regression models. FINDINGS CRC incidence rates did not differ between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties by gender (males: 46.2 per 100,000 vs 45.1 per 100,000, P = .87; females: 34.4 per 100,000 vs 36.1 per 100,000, P = .70). However, CRC incidence between the years of 2006 and 2010 in nonmetropolitan counties was significantly higher in females (metropolitan: 30.4 vs nonmetropolitan: 37.0 per 100,000, P = .002). As compared to metropolitan counties, the incidence of unstaged CRC in nonmetropolitan counties was significantly higher in both males (1.7 vs 2.8 per 100,000, P = .003) and females (1.4 vs 1.6 per 100,000, P = .002). Among patients who were diagnosed between 2006 and 2010, metropolitan counties were found to have significantly increased survival among males and females, but nonmetropolitan counties showed increased survival only for males. CONCLUSIONS While we observed a decreasing incidence of CRC among men and women in Utah, this effect was not seen in women in nonmetropolitan areas nor among those with unstaged disease. Further studies should evaluate factors that may account for these differences. This analysis can inform interventions with a focus on women in nonmetropolitan areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brynn Fowler
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - N Jewel Samadder
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Deanna Kepka
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.,College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Qian Ding
- Study Design and Biostatistics Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Lisa Pappas
- Study Design and Biostatistics Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Anne C Kirchhoff
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hong JL, Henderson LM, Jonsson Funk M, Lund JL, Buse JB, Pate V, Stürmer T. Differential Use of Screening Mammography in Older Women Initiating Metformin versus Sulfonylurea. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2017; 26:666-675. [PMID: 28370798 DOI: 10.1002/pds.4195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2016] [Revised: 02/13/2017] [Accepted: 02/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Differential use of screening mammography may lead to biased detection of breast cancer. This study aimed to compare receipt of screening mammography and the incidence of screen-detected breast cancer between metformin and sulfonylurea initiators. METHODS We used 2006-2014 US Medicare claims to identify initiators of metformin or sulfonylurea aged 65+ years continuously enrolled in Parts A/B for ≥2 years pre-initiation and ≥2 years post-initiation. We reported frequencies of screening mammograms and screen-detected breast cancer in 1 year pre-initiation among all cohort members and in 1 year post-initiation among cancer-free cohort members. Weighted screening risk differences (RDs) were estimated comparing metformin to sulfonylurea group. RESULTS We identified 41,436 and 13,367 initiators of metformin and sulfonylurea, 35% and 24% of which had ≥1 screening mammogram in 1 year pre-initiation (weighted RD: 6 percentage points; 95% CI: 5 to 7), respectively. The weighted RD for screen-detected breast cancer associated with metformin was 0.00 percentage points (95% CI: -0.09 to 0.09). Among cancer-free cohort members, metformin initiators had 5 percentage points (95% CI: 4 to 6) and 0.11 percentage points (95% CI: -0.02 to 0.23) absolute risk excess of screening mammography and screen-detected breast cancer in 1 year post-initiation, compared with sulfonylurea initiators, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Metformin initiators were more likely to receive screening mammograms than sulfonylurea initiators pre- and post-initiation, indicating possible detection bias due to differential screening mammography. Researchers should be aware of the potential for more screening mammograms pre- and post-initiation when interpreting the findings of metformin on breast cancer incidence. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Liern Hong
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Louise M Henderson
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Michele Jonsson Funk
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer L Lund
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - John B Buse
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Virginia Pate
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Til Stürmer
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Adegboyega A, Hatcher J. Factors Influencing Pap Screening Use Among African Immigrant Women. J Transcult Nurs 2016; 28:479-487. [PMID: 27470266 DOI: 10.1177/1043659616661612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Papanicolau (Pap) screenings disparities exist for immigrant women in the United States. This study sought to have an understanding of factors influencing Pap screening among sub-Saharan African immigrant women. METHOD This is a qualitative descriptive study. Women were recruited from the community and by word of mouth following institutional review board approval. Data were gathered through in-depth focus group and demographic questionnaires. Interview sessions were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed for themes. FINDINGS Twenty-two women aged 24 to 65 years were interviewed. Barriers to screening included low knowledge of screening, cost, cultural beliefs, fear and communication issues. Motivators to improve Pap use include provider's recommendations, enlightenment, and family support. DISCUSSION Interventions addressing the barriers peculiar to this population may alleviate these barriers and improve Pap screening use in this population. Providers have the opportunity to influence screening attitudes of African-born women by providing awareness and patient-targeted interventions.
Collapse
|
6
|
Molina Y, Ornelas IJ, Doty SL, Bishop S, Beresford SAA, Coronado GD. Family/friend recommendations and mammography intentions: the roles of perceived mammography norms and support. HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH 2015; 30:797-809. [PMID: 26324395 PMCID: PMC4654755 DOI: 10.1093/her/cyv040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2014] [Accepted: 08/06/2015] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Identifying factors that increase mammography use among Latinas is an important public health priority. Latinas are more likely to report mammography intentions and use, if a family member or friend recommends that they get a mammogram. Little is known about the mechanisms underlying the relationship between social interactions and mammography intentions. Theory suggests that family/friend recommendations increase perceived mammography norms (others believe a woman should obtain a mammogram) and support (others will help her obtain a mammogram), which in turn increase mammography intentions and use. We tested these hypotheses with data from the ¡Fortaleza Latina! study, a randomized controlled trial including 539 Latinas in Washington State. Women whose family/friend recommended they get a mammogram within the last year were more likely to report mammography intentions, norms and support. Perceived mammography norms mediated the relationship between family/friend recommendations and intentions, Mediated Effect = 0.38, 95%CI [0.20, 0.61], but not support, Mediated Effect = 0.002, 95%CI [-0.07, 0.07]. Our findings suggest perceived mammography norms are a potential mechanism underlying the effect of family/friend recommendations on mammography use among Latinas. Our findings make an important contribution to theory about the associations of social interactions, perceptions and health behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yamile Molina
- Community Health Sciences Division, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA, Cancer Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA,
| | - India J Ornelas
- Cancer Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98122, USA
| | - Sarah L Doty
- Sea Mar community Health Centers, Seattle, WA 98108, USA
| | - Sonia Bishop
- Cancer Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Shirley A A Beresford
- Sea Mar community Health Centers, Seattle, WA 98108, USA, Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98122, USA and
| | - Gloria D Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Research Center for Health Research, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| |
Collapse
|