Role of resection for Bismuth type IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma and analysis of determining factors for curative resection

Hepatic Hilum Variations and Their Clinical Considerations in the Liver: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The liver has a region called the hepatic hilum (HH) where structures enter and exit: anteriorly, the left and right hepatic ducts; posteriorly, the portal vein; and between these, the left and right hepatic arteries. The objective of this review is to know how variants in structures of the hepatic hilum are associated with clinical alterations of the liver. Methods: The databases Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and LILACS were researched until January 2024. The methodological quality was evaluated with an assurance tool for anatomical studies (AQUA). The pooled prevalence was estimated using a random effects model. Results: A total of six studies met the selection criteria established in this study for meta-analysis. The prevalence of hepatic hilus variants was 9% (CI = 5% to 13%), and the heterogeneity was 83%. The other studies were analyzed descriptively and with their respective clinical considerations in the presence of the variant, such as the high incidence of the Michels type III variant; among the portal vein variants, the type III variant of the Cheng classification stands out and in biliary anatomy, and the IIIa variant stands out according to the Choi classification. Conclusions: This review allowed us to know in detail the anatomical variants of HH; the structure with which the greatest care should be taken is the hepatic artery because of the probability of metastatic processes due to increased blood distribution in the hepatic lobules. Finally, we believe that new anatomical and clinical studies are needed to improve our knowledge of the relationship between HH variants and liver alterations or surgeries.

Right hepatectomy compared with left hepatectomy for resectable Klatskin tumor: A systematic review across tumor types

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of Klatskin tumors is poor, and radical surgery with disease-free surgical margins (R0) represents the treatment capable of ensuring the best long-term outcomes. In patients with Klatskin tumors, both right hepatectomy and left hepatectomy might achieve R0 surgical margins. This systematic review concentrated on a comparative investigation between left hepatectomy and right hepatectomy, aiming to furnish clinical evidence and to aid in surgical decision-making for Klatskin tumor depending on its spread within the bile duct tree.

METHODS

The eligible articles in the study were obtained from PubMed, Medline, and Scopus databases, following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, and they were categorized according to the type of Klatskin tumor treated with right hepatectomy or left hepatectomy. The studies that analyzed the outcomes related to the 2 surgical techniques without focusing on the type of Klatskin tumor were included in a separate paragraph and table.

RESULTS

In total, 21 studies were included. Four studies reported outcomes of right hepatectomy or left hepatectomy for Klatskin type I/II tumor, 2 for Klatskin type II/IV tumor, 2 for Klatskin type III tumor, and 2 for Klatskin type IV. Eleven studies included the outcomes of right hepatectomy and left hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma without specifying the type of Klatskin tumor. Although long-term oncologic outcomes seem comparable between right hepatectomy and left hepatectomy when achieving R0 resection for Klatskin type III/IV tumors, there may exist a marginal oncologic edge and reduced complication rates favoring left hepatectomy in individuals with Klatskin type I/II tumors.

DISCUSSION

Right hepatectomy traditionally has played a central role in treating Klatskin tumor, but recent studies have questioned its oncologic efficacy and surgical risks. Currently, there is a lack of evidence regarding the ideal surgical approach for each type of Klatskin tumor, and surgical strategy relies heavily on the individual surgeon's experience and technical skills. The management of Klatskin tumors necessitates specialized hepatobiliary surgical centers capable of conducting major hepatectomy with thorough lymphadenectomy, biliary, and vascular reconstructions. There is a need for studies with larger sample sizes to achieve a wide consensus about the superiority of one surgical technique over the other in cases in which both right hepatectomy and left hepatectomy can achieve an R0 margin.

Survival outcome of surgical resection compared to non-resection for Bismuth type IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Bismuth type IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma has been considered an unresectable disease. The aim of the study was to assess whether the surgical resection of type IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma was associated with better survival rates.

METHODS

The data of 117 patients diagnosed with type IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma at Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital from 2005 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The Bismuth type was assigned based on the patient's radiological imaging findings. The primary outcomes were the surgical results and median overall survival.

RESULTS

The demographic characteristics of the 117 patients with type IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma were comparable between the surgical resection and non-resection groups. Thirty-two (27.4%) patients underwent surgical resections. A left hepatectomy was performed in 16 patients, right hepatectomy in 13 patients, and a central bi-sectionectomy in three patients. The remaining 85 patients received non-surgical treatments. Thirteen (10.9%) received palliative chemotherapy, and 72 (60.5%) patients received conservative treatment including biliary drainage. The patients in the resection group showed significantly longer median overall survival than the patients in the non-resection group (32.4 vs 16.0 months; P = 0.002), even though the positive resection margin rate was high (62.5%). Surgical complications occurred in 15 (46.9%) patients. Complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade III or higher occurred in 13 (40.6%) patients and grade V in two patients (6.3%).

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection for Bismuth type IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is technically demanding. The survival of the resection group was significantly better than that of the non-resection group. The resection of selected patients achieved a curative goal with acceptable postoperative morbidity, although the microscopically positive resection margin rate was high.

Comparative study on left-sided versus right-sided hepatectomy for resectable peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is a unique entity, and radical surgery provides the only chance for cure and long-term survival. But it is still under debate which surgical strategy (i.e., left-sided hepatectomy, LH or right-sided hepatectomy, RH) should be followed and benefitted.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the clinical outcomes and prognostic value of LH versus RH for resectable pCCA. This study followed the PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 14 cohort studies include 1072 patients in the meta-analysis. The results showed no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). But compared to the LH group, the RH group exhibited more employment of preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE), higher rate of overall complications, post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), and perioperative mortality, while LH was associated with higher frequency of arterial resection/reconstruction, longer operative time, and more postoperative bile leakage. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of preoperative biliary drainage, R0 resection rate, portal vein resection, intraoperative bleeding, and intraoperative blood transfusion rate.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our meta-analyses, LH and RH have comparable oncological effects on curative resection for pCCA patients. Although LH is not inferior to RH in DFS and OS, it requires more arterial reconstruction which is technically demanding and should be performed by experienced surgeons in high-volume centers. Selectin of surgical strategy between LH and RH should be based on not only tumor location (Bismuth classification) but also vascular involvement and future liver remnant (FLR).

Impact of surgery on survival outcomes for Bismuth type IV Klatskin tumors

BACKGROUND

Bismuth-Corlette type IV Klatskin tumors have conventionally been considered unresectable. This retrospective study aimed to demonstrate the survival improvement of patients with type IV Klatskin tumors when resected and suggest possible radiological features for R0 resectability.

METHODS

Data on type IV Klatskin tumors diagnosed between 2008 and 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with distant metastasis, concomitant other cancers at the initial state, extensive vascular invasions, poor liver function, and poor general condition were excluded. The survival outcomes of patients and radiologic parameters of bile duct tumors were compared between the curative resection (R0, 1 resection) and non-resection groups.

RESULTS

The demographic findings of patients with curative resection (n = 48) and non-resection (n = 111) were comparable. Both were potentially resectable in the initial state. The postoperative morbidity was 22.9% and the 90-day mortality 4.2%. There was a significant difference in the median survival among the curative-intended resection, palliative treatment, and supportive care groups (35, 16, and 12 months, respectively; P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

In patients with type IV Klatskin tumor without extensive tumor invasion into adjacent tissues, including major vessels, surgical resection can be considered for better survival.

CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

IRB No. 2009-100-1157.

A Consensus Meeting on Expert Recommendations on Operating Specifications for Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Background: With advances in techniques and technologies, laparoscopic radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) has gradually been carried out in major medical centers in China. Its feasibility and safety have been accepted by a group of Chinese surgical experts. Methods: To standardize perioperative management of HCCA by using laparoscopic resectional approach, to ensure safety of the patient with standardized management, improve prognosis of the patient, and enable proper application and refinement of this surgical approach, the expert group on specifications for laparoscopic radical resection of HCCA in China organized a consensus meeting. Results: Laparoscopic radical resection of HCCA is difficult and associated with high risks. Appropriate patients should be carefully selected and this surgical approach should be promoted gradually. The experts met and arrived at 16 recommendations on perioperative management of HCCA by using laparoscopic surgery. There were three recommendations on preoperative diagnosis and evaluation; one recommendation on surgical principles of treatment; one recommendation on indications and contraindications; one recommendation on credentialing, staffing, and equipment; nine recommendations on laparoscopic techniques in different stages of operation; and one recommendation on indications for conversion to open surgery. Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery for HCCA is still in the early phase of development. This consensus provides a clinical reference with the aim to promote and to facilitate its further development.

Current Status and Recent Update of Imaging Evaluation for Peri-Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

간문주변부의 해부학적 복잡성으로 인해 간문주변부 담관암은 그 진단과 치료가 어려운 질환으로 알려져 있다. 간문주변부 담관암이 의심되는 환자에 있어서, 영상 검사는 이상 소견의 발견 및 감별 진단, 종양의 종축 침범 부위의 파악, 인접 혈관 침범과 원격 전이 유무의 파악, 그리고 최종적으로 수술적 절제 가능 유무의 평가에 있어 핵심적인 역할을 하고 있다. 이 종설에서는 간문주변부 담관암의 분류 및 종양의 평가를 위해 권고되는 표준 영상 검사의 기법과 간문주변부 담관암의 전형적인 영상 소견에 대해 기술할 예정이다. 종축 방향의 종양 침범 파악, 인접 혈관 침범 및 원격 전이 유무의 평가에 있어서 각 영상 검사 소견과 그 진단능에 대해 논의할 예정이다. 이후 전통적인 절제 가능성 평가의 개념에 대해 고찰하고, 최근의 경향을 소개한다.

Survival outcomes of hepatic resections in Bismuth-Corlette type IV cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection for Bismuth-Corlette type IV (BC-IV) hilar cholangiocarcinomas, also termed Klatskin tumours are technically challenging and were once considered unresectable tumours. Following advances in hepatobiliary imaging and surgical techniques, emerging evidence suggests that surgical resection is a viable avenue for long-term survival. We aimed to identify factors affecting survival outcomes of hepatic resections for BC-IV cholangiocarcinomas.

METHOD

A systematic review was performed across multiple databases and several clinical trial registries. Two reviewers independently screened and selected papers that contained survival data on BC-IV cholangiocarcinoma after hepatic resections.

RESULTS

Of 13 499 papers from our search result, 21 papers satisfied the inclusion criteria. The median post-operative survival was 30.8 months. The average 1- and 5-year post-operative survivals were 61.6 and 33.3%, respectively. Predictors of long-term survival included achievement of R0 margins, minimisation of operative time and reduction intra-operative blood loss.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis demonstrates improving post-operative outcomes and survival in surgical resection of BC-IV cholangiocarcinoma and suggests that radical surgical resection is a valid treatment option for the disease.

Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: an updated systematic review

BACKGROUND

The role of laparoscopic surgery (Lap) and robotic surgery (Rob) for radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is not clear. We summarized the safety and feasibility of Lap and Rob for HC.

METHODS

A search of all HC studies in English published on PubMed up to April 2020 was conducted. References from retrieved articles were reviewed to broaden the search.

RESULTS

In total, 23 reports were enrolled: 15 involving Lap, seven using Rob and one study reporting a minimally invasive approach (Lap or Rob, not specified). A total of 205 cases of HC were documented (Lap/Rob/not specified, 99/101/5): 37 cases of Bismuth type-I (Lap/Rob, 17/20), 22 cases of Bismuth type-II (Lap/Rob, 15/7), 68 cases of type-III (Lap/Rob, 39/29) and 13 cases of type-IV (Lap/Rob, 9/4). The pooled prevalence of R0 resection was 80.1% (Lap/Rob, 85.9%/71.0%). The weighted mean for operative time, blood loss and post-operative hospital stay was 458.4 min (Lap/Rob, 423.3/660.8 min), 615.3 mL (Lap/Rob, 521.0/1188.5 mL) and 14.0 days (Lap/Rob, 14.0/13.7 days), respectively. The pooled prevalence of conversion to open surgery, post-operative complications, and perioperative mortality was 9.1% (Lap/Rob, 12.2%/3.8%), 47.2% (Lap/Rob, 38.4%/61.3%) and 3.0% (Lap/Rob, 4.0%/2.0%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

With innovations in technology and gradual accumulation of surgical experience, the feasibility and safety of performing Lap and Rob for HC will improve.

Comparison study for surgical outcomes of right versus left side hemihepatectomy to treat hilar cholangiocellular carcinoma

Purpose

Major liver resection and radical lymph node dissection has been accepted as a definite treatment of choice for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC). However, the perioperative and survival outcomes of right hemihepatectomy (RH) and left hemihepatectomy (LH) still remain controversial. Thus, this study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of RH and LH in HC patients.

Methods

From January 2000 to January 2018, a total of 326 patients underwent surgical resection for HC at Yonsei University College of Medicine in Seoul, Korea. Among the 326 patients, we excluded 130 patients and selected 196 patients, who underwent hemihepatectomy with caudate lobectomy. Among these 196 patients, 114 patients underwent RH, and 82 patients underwent LH. We compared the clinicopathological features as well as the surgical and oncologic outcomes of the RH and LH groups.

Results

There were no significant differences in disease-free survival (P = 0.473) or overall survival (P = 0.946) in the RH and LH groups. The LH group had fewer complications compared with the RH group, including postoperative ascites (RH: 15 [13.2%] vs. LH: 3 [3.7%], P = 0.023); however, the LH group had more bile leakage complications (RH: 5 [4.4%] vs. LH: 12 [14.6%], P = 0.012). The average time lag from portal vein embolization to operation was 25.80 ± 12.06 days (n = 45). There was no difference in postoperative liver failure (P = 0.402), although there were significantly more frequent ascites after RH (P = 0.023).

Conclusion

LH might be a good alternative option for the surgical treatment of HC given appropriate tumor location and biliary anatomy indications.

Surgical Resection and Prognostic Analysis of 142 Cases of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma is the only curative option, but low resectability rate and poor survival outcomes remain a challenge. This study was to assess the surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma and analyze the prognostic factors influencing postoperative survival. One hundred forty-two patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent surgical resection between January 2006 and December 2014 were analyzed retrospectively based on clinicopathological and demographic data. Univariate and multivariate analysis against outcome were employed to identify potential factors affecting prognosis. Ninety-five patients were performed with R0 resection with median survival time of 22 months; whereas, 47 patients underwent non-R0 resection (R1 = 20, R2 = 27) with that of 10 months. Of these 95 patients, 19 underwent concomitant with vascular resection and reconstruction and 2 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. 64.8% patients (n = 92) underwent combined with hepatectomy. The one-year, three-year, and five-year survival rates after R0 resection were 76.3, 27.8, 11.3%, respectively, which was significantly better than that after non-curative resection (P = 0.000). Multivariate analysis revealed that non-curative resection (RR: 2.414, 95% CI 1.586–3.676, P = 0.000), pathological differentiation (P = 0.015) and preoperative serum total bilirubin above 10 mg/dL (RR: 1.844, 95% CI 1.235–2.752, P = 0.003) were independent prognostic factors. Aggressive curative resection remains to be the optimal option for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Non-curative resection, pathological differentiation, and preoperative serum total bilirubin above 10 mg/ dL were associated with dismal prognosis.

Hilar en bloc resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma in patients with limited liver capacities-preserving parts of liver segment 4

Background

A right trisectionectomy with portal vein resection represents the conventional approach for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Here, we present a technical modification of hilar en bloc resection in order to increase the remnant volume by partially preserving liver segment 4.

Methods

The caudal parenchymal dissection line starts centrally between the left lateral and left medial segments. Cranially, the resection line switches to the right towards Cantlie's line and turns again upwards perpendicularly. Hence, segment 4a and subtotal segment 4b are partially preserved by this novel technique. The left hepatic duct is dissected at the segmental ramification and reconstruction is performed as a single hepaticojejunostomy. The feasibility of the novel parenchyma-sparing approach for hilar cholangiocarcinoma was proven in a case series and medical records were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

Ten patients (6 male, 4 female) underwent segment 4 partially preserving right trisectionectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Estimated future liver remnant volume was significantly increased (FLRV 38.3%), when compared to standard right trisectionectomy (FLRV 23.9%; p < 0.01). Three of 10 liver resections were associated with major surgical complications (≥IIIb; n = 3); categorized according to the Dindo-Clavien classification. No patient died due to complications associated with postoperatively impaired liver function. Tumor-free margins could be achieved in 8 patients while median overall survival and disease-free survival were 547 and 367 days, respectively.

Conclusion

This novel parenchyma-sparing modification of hilar en bloc resection by partially preserving segment 4 allows to safely increase the remnant liver volume without neglecting principles of local radicality.

Preoperative prediction of curative surgery of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma by combination of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography

Background

Perihilar cholangiocarcinomas are often considered incurable. Late diagnosis is common. Advanced disease therefore frequently causes questioning of curative surgical outcome.

Aim

This study aimed to develop a prediction model of curative surgery in patients suffering from perihilar cholangiocarcinomas based on preoperative endosonography and computer tomography.

Methods

A cohort of 81 patients (median age 67 (54-75) years, 62% male) with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma was retrospectively analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of staging variables taken from the European Staging System was performed and applied to ROC analysis.

Results

The correlation of predicted rates of eligibility for surgery with actual rates reached AUC values between 0.652 and 0.758 for endosonography and computer tomography (p < 0.05 each). Best prediction for curative surgical option was achieved by combining endosonography and computer tomography (AUC: 0.787; 95% CI 0.680-0.893, p < 0.0001). A predictive model (pSurg) was developed using multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Our predictive web-based model pSurg with inclusion of T, N, M, B, PV, HA and V stage of the recently published European Staging System for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma results in highly significant predictability for curative surgery when combining preoperative endosonography and computer tomography, thus allowing for better patient selection in terms of possibility of curative surgery.

Laparoscopic resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Laparoscopic resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is technically challenging because it involves complicated laparoscopic procedures that include laparoscopic hepatoduodenal lymphadenectomy, hemihepatectomy with caudate lobectomy, and hepaticojejunostomy. There are currently very few reports describing this type of surgery. Between August 2014 and December 2014, 5 patients underwent total laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Two patients with type I or II hilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent radical hilar resection. Three patients with type IIIa or IIIb cholangiocarcinoma underwent extended hemihepatectomy together with caudate lobectomy. The median (range) age, operation time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 63 years (43-76 years), 610 minutes (410-665 minutes), 650 mL (450-1,300 mL), and 12 days (9-21 days), respectively. Four patients had a negative margin, but 1 patient was diagnosed with high-grade dysplasia on the proximal resection margin. The median tumor size was 3.0 cm. One patient experienced postoperative biliary leakage, which resolved spontaneously. Laparoscopic resection is a feasible surgical approach in selected patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.