Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy versus duodenal stenting in unresectable gastric cancer with gastric outlet obstruction

Analysis of the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric pyloric obstruction

Objective

To explore the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer and pyloric obstruction.

Methods

We included patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LGJ) or endoscopic stenting (ES) between May 2017 and October 2022. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was used to evaluate the patient nutritional status. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios were used to evaluate the inflammatory status of patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze survival conditions, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival differences. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors related that might affect the prognosis.

Results

During the study period, 41 patients received LGJ and 37 patients received endoscopic stenting (ES). Patients in the ES group had higher rates of postoperative complications, particularly bleeding (0 vs. 16.2%, P<0.05). After two cycles NACT, the proportion of PNI≥45 patients in LGJ group was significantly higher than that in ES group (P<0.05). Furthermore, the proportion of patients with PLR<162 in the ES group was significantly higher than that in the LGJ group (P<0.05), and compared to the ES group, patients in the LGJ group were able to tolerate more cycles of NACT (6 vs. 4 cycles). A higher median survival time was observed in the LGJ group, and the multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed treatment selection as an independent risk factor for overall survival (HR, 6.362; 95% CI:3.285-12.321, P<0.001).

Conclusion

NACT after LGJ shows potential for reducing tumor stage and improving patient prognosis.

A national perspective on palliative interventions for malignant gastric outlet obstruction

BACKGROUND

Of note, 15% to 20% of patients with duodenal or periampullary malignancies develop gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Although small randomized trials have reported more rapid recovery and shorter hospital stay with endoscopic stenting (ES), limited studies have evaluated outcomes at a national level. The current study characterized short-term clinical and financial outcomes associated with gastrojejunostomy (GJ) vs ES in malignant GOO.

METHODS

Adults with malignant GOO treated with ES or GJ were identified in the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Entropy balancing was used to balance covariates between groups, and multivariate regression was used to evaluate the association between GJ or ES and in-hospital mortality, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) use, complications, length of stay (LOS), costs, and 90-day readmission.

RESULTS

Of 8186 patients with GOO, 5603 (68.4%) underwent ES, and 2583 (31.6%) underwent GJ. The cohorts were similar in age, female/male sex, and comorbidities. However, patients who underwent GJ were more commonly frail. After risk adjustment, mortality, composite complications, and 90-day readmission were comparable between patients who underwent GJ and those who underwent ES. GJ was associated with greater odds of blood transfusion (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.74; 95% CI, 1.37-2.21) and postoperative TPN use (AOR, 3.76; 95% CI, 2.64-5.35). Furthermore, patients who underwent GJ experienced a significant increment of >$15,800 in costs and >6.9 days in LOS. In subgroup analysis of patients with metastatic disease, mortality, complications, and readmission remained comparable among palliation strategies.

CONCLUSION

ES seems to yield comparable short-term morbidity and mortality relative to GJ with significant cost reduction. Increasing access to endoscopic technology and regionalizing care to high-volume centers may help improve outcomes for patients with malignant GOO.

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2024: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach (Update of 2022 Guideline)

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area. Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version. Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

[Treatment Strategies for Gastric Cancer Patients with Gastric Outlet Obstruction]

Gastric cancer frequently leads to gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), causing significant symptoms and complications. Surgical bypass and stenting are two representative palliative treatments for GOO by gastric cancer. This study reviews clinical guidelines for malignant GOO treatment, highlighting differences in recommendations based on patient survival expectations and systemic health. A meta-analysis of surgical bypass and stenting in gastric cancer patients revealed no significant difference in technical and clinical success rates between the two treatments. However, stenting allowed faster resumption of oral intake and shorter hospital stays but had higher rates of major complications and reobstruction. Despite these differences, overall survival did not significantly differ between the two groups. Emerging techniques like EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy show promise but require further research and experienced practitioners. Ultimately, treatment should be tailored to patient preferences and the specific benefits and drawbacks of each method to improve quality of life and outcomes.

Stomach-partitioning versus conventional gastrojejunostomy for unresectable gastric cancer with gastric outlet obstruction: A propensity score matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Stomach partitioning gastrojejunostomy (SPGJ) was introduced to deal with delayed gastric emptying (DGE). This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of SPGJ versus conventional gastrojejunostomy (CGJ).

METHOD

This cohort study analyzed 108 patients who underwent gastrojejunostomy for unresectable gastric cancer: 70 patients underwent SPGJ, and 38 patients underwent CGJ between 2018 and 2022. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was used to balance the baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

After PSM, there were 26 patients in each group. SPGJ group had significantly lower incidence of DGE (3.8% vs. 34.6%), vomiting (3.8% vs. 42.3%), and prokinetics requirement (11.5% vs. 46.2%). SPGJ group had significantly shorter time to solid diet tolerance (4.1 days vs. 5.7 days) and postoperative hospital stay (7.7 days vs. 9.3 days). There was no significant difference in relapse reinterventions, gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) recurrence, conversion surgery, and survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

SGPJ was associated with lower rate of DGE, prokinetics requirement, and shorter time of solid diet tolerance compared to CGJ in the treatment of unresectable gastric cancer patients with GOO.

Optimizing the Continuum of Care in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) still ranks as the fifth most common malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite the recent progress in the therapeutic algorithm of the advanced disease with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and next-generation HER2-directed therapies, survival rates remain poor, with a median survival hardly exceeding 12 months. Furthermore, only 40% of patients remain eligible for second- and later-line treatments due to the aggressiveness of the disease and the rapid deterioration of performance status (PS). Thus, current research is focusing either on the identification of novel treatment options or the development of personalized strategies to optimize the continuum of care and ultimately improve patients' outcome. In this article, we provide an overview of the current treatment landscape for advanced GC with a particular emphasis on later-line treatments and outline novel perspectives on the horizon.

Efficacy and safety of self-expandable metal stent placement for treatment of primary and metastatic gastric outlet obstruction

BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) usually occurs at the pylorus or the duodenum through primary gastric, duodenal, or pancreatic tumors. However, metastatic GOO is relatively rare. Although self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement is often performed as an alternative and practical palliative approach for primary GOO, there are few reports of metastatic GOO treatment with SEMS. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy, safety, stent patency, and complications of SEMS for treating primary and metastatic GOO.

METHODS

The data of 42 patients with GOO who received SEMS from November 2016 to April 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into primary group (n = 25) and metastatic group (n = 17) according to the cause of GOO. The rates of technical and clinical success, stent patency, and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The overall technical and clinical success rates were 97.9% and 93.5%, respectively. The total SEMS implantation time was 48.2 ± 33.5 (10.0-140.0) minutes. The primary technical success rate was 100.0% in both primary and metastatic groups, and the primary clinical success rate was 96.0% (24/25) in the primary group vs 88.2% (15/17) in the metastatic group (P = 0.350). After reintervention, the secondary technical success rate was 100.0% (27/27) in the primary group vs 95.0% (19/20) in the metastatic group (P = 0.330); and the secondary clinical success rate was 96.3% (26/27) in the primary group vs 89.5% (17/19) in the metastatic group (P = 0.367). No serious complications, such as gastrointestinal perforation, stent migration, bleeding, or aspiration pneumonia, were observed in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

SEMS under fluoroscopic guidance is an effective and safe treatment for primary and metastatic GOO. The etiology of obstruction did not influence stent patency or complications. Therefore, stent implantation is recommended for patients with metastatic GOO caused by multiple peritoneal metastases to improve their quality of life.

Early stage gastric adenocarcinoma: clinical and molecular landscapes

Gastric adenocarcinoma, even when diagnosed at an early (localized) disease stage, poses a major health-care burden with cure rates that remain unsatisfactorily low, particularly in Western countries. This lack of progress reflects, among other aspects, the impracticality of early diagnosis, considerable variations in therapeutic approaches that is partly based on regional preferences, and the ingrained heterogeneity of gastric adenocarcinoma cells and their associated tumour microenvironment (TME). Clinical trials have long applied empirical interventions with the assumption that all early stage gastric adenocarcinomas are alike. Despite certain successes, the shortcomings of these approaches can potentially be overcome by targeting the specific molecular subsets of gastric adenocarcinomas identified by genomic and/or multi-omics analyses, including microsatellite instability-high, Epstein-Barr virus-induced, DNA damage repair-deficient, HER2-positive and PD-L1-high subtypes. Future approaches, including the availability of sophisticated vaccines, novel antibody technologies, agents targeting TME components (including fibroblasts, macrophages, cytokines or chemokines, and T cells) and novel immune checkpoint inhibitors, supported by improved tissue-based and blood-based diagnostic assays, seem promising. In this Review, we highlight current knowledge of the molecular and cellular biology of gastric adenocarcinomas, summarize the current approaches to clinical management of the disease, and consider the role of novel management and/or treatment strategies.

Application and progress of palliative therapy in advanced gastric carcinomas

Gastric carcinomas have high morbidity and mortality. It produces no noticeable symptoms in the early stage while causing complex complications in its advanced stage, making treatment difficult. Palliative therapy aims to relieve the symptoms of cancer patients and focuses on improving their quality of life. At present, five palliative therapies for advanced gastric carcinomas are offered: resection, gastrojejunostomy, stenting, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. In recent years, palliative therapy has been used in the clinical treatment of advanced gastric carcinomas and related complications because of its efficacy in gastric outlet obstruction and gastric bleeding. In the future, multimodal and interdisciplinary palliative therapies can be applied to control general symptoms to improve patients’ condition, prolong their lifespan and improve their quality of life.

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.

Comparison of Duodenal Stenting and Gastrojejunostomy for Duodenal Obstruction with Biliary Obstruction

BACKGROUND

The best palliation for double obstruction (duodenal obstruction with biliary obstruction) remains unclear. We aimed to compare outcomes of duodenal stenting (DuS) with gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and identify factors associated with survival time and time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO).

METHODS

Patients who underwent DuS or GJ combined with biliary stenting for double obstruction due to unresectable malignancy were retrospectively enrolled.

RESULTS

In total, 111 patients were included; 84 underwent DuS, and 27 underwent GJ. The weighted survival time of the DuS group was significantly shorter than that of the GJ group (86 days vs 134 days, P < 0.01). Although the weighted TRBO was not significantly different between the two groups, when limited to patients with distal duodenal obstruction, the weighted TRBO was significantly longer in the DuS group than in the GJ group (207 days vs. 32 days, P < 0.01). GJ for distal duodenal obstruction was identified as the factor with the highest hazard ratio and was associated with a shorter TRBO (hazard ratio 8.5, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding survival time, GJ should be considered the primary treatment for patients with double obstruction. However, for patients with distal duodenal obstruction, DuS should be considered because GJ may be a risk factor for a shorter TRBO.

How to successfully administer palliative treatment with a stent for malignant gastric outlet obstruction?

Although endoscopic stenting (ES) has been widely used as a less-invasive palliation method for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), recent reports have highlighted issues related to the procedure. For successful treatment, various aspects must be assessed before considering the practices. First, it is necessary to eliminate cases with contraindications such as coexistence of distal small-bowel obstruction or perforation. Other factors potentially related to clinical failure (i.e., peritoneal carcinomatosis) may require consideration but remain controversial. ES has better short-term outcomes than surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJ). GJ has recently been considered preferable in cases with longer life expectancy because of superior sustainability. Various types of stents are now commercially available, but their ideal structure and mechanical properties have not yet been clarified. Covered metal stent may reduce stent obstruction but is prone to increase stent migration, and its significance remains uncertain. Subsequent chemotherapy after stenting should be considered, as it is expected to prolong patient survival without increasing the risk of adverse events. Furthermore, it may be helpful in preventing tumor ingrowth. In cases with GOO combined with biliary obstruction, biliary intervention is often difficult. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been widely used as an alternative procedure for endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage (ETBD). Despite the lack of consensus as to whether ETBD or EUS-BD is preferred, EUS-BD is useful as a salvage technique for cases where ETBD is difficult. To perform stent placement successfully, it is important to pay attention to the above points; however, many remaining issues need to be clarified in the future.

Comparison of gastrojejunostomy to endoscopic stenting for gastric outlet obstruction: An updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the optimal intervention modality for malignant GOO by comparing clinical outcomes after Gastrojejunostomy and endoscopic stenting.

METHODS

Two authors independently searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles before February 2021 to compare the clinical outcomes of GOO patients undergoing GJ or ES.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 31 articles with 2444 GOO patients. Although the GJ group outperformed the ES group in technical success (OR,3.79; P = 0.003), clinical success was not significantly different between the two groups (OR,1.25; P = 0.50). The GJ group had a longer hospitalization, lower re-obstruction and lower reintervention. Moreover, GJ had a better survival than ES in the gastric cancer group (HR, 0.33; P = 0.009). However, no significant statistical difference was observed in the pancreatic cancer group (HR, 0.55; P = 0.159).

CONCLUSIONS

Both GJ and ES are safe and effective intervention modalities for malignant GOO. GJ had significantly improved survival in gastric cancer patients with GOO, while no significant difference was observed between the two groups in pancreatic cancer patients with GOO.

Superiority of Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy Combined With Multimodality Therapy for Gastric Outlet Obstruction Caused by Advanced Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Data are limited concerning the survival outcomes of patients with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) caused by advanced gastric cancers according to laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LGJ) combined with multimodality therapy (MMT). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility and efficacy of these therapies.

METHODS

This single-centered, retrospective analysis included data of 184 patients with GOO due to advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Treatment models were: laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy combined with multimodality therapy (LGJ+MMT), endoscopic metal stent placement combined with multimodality therapy (EMSP+MMT), and multimodality therapy (MMT).

RESULTS

Improved oral intake, better nutritional indices, and better response to chemotherapy were observed in the LGJ+MMT group. Subsequent gastrectomy was performed in 43 (61.4%) patients in the LGJ+MMT group, 23 (37.7%) in the EMSP+MMT group, and 11 (20.8%) in the MMT group (P<0.001). LGJ+MMT was associated with better long-term prognosis. As confirmed by propensity scores and multivariate analyses, the 3-year survival rates in the three treatment models were 31.4% with LGJ+MMT, 0% with EMSP+MMT, and 0% with MMT in conversion therapy, and 50.0% with LGJ+MMT, 33.3% with EMSP+MMT, and 23.5% with MMT in NAC. A forest plot revealed that LGJ+MMT was related to a decreased risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

LGJ combined with MMT was associated with better nutritional status, higher rates of subsequent gastrectomy, and good prognosis. LGJ combined with MMT may improve the long-term survival of patients with GOO caused by AGC.

Pyloric stent insertion in malignant gastric outlet obstruction: moving beyond palliation

Background:

Self-expandable metallic stents have not only largely replaced surgical gastrojejunostomy for unresectable gastric cancers, but their role as bridging therapy for resectable obstructing tumours is also evolving.

Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pyloric stents in gastric outlet obstruction in patients with gastric cancer and assess survival in patients with resectable obstructing gastric tumours in whom stents were inserted as a bridge to surgery.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent self-expandable metallic stent insertion for gastric outlet obstruction due to gastric cancer from January 2014 to March 2019.

Results:

Out of 161 patients, clinical improvement was observed in 159 (99%) and 156 (97%) at 1 and 12 weeks of stent placement, respectively. None of these patients experienced serious complications, such as perforation or aspiration pneumonia. Of these 161 patients, enteral stents were placed as bridging therapy prior to surgery in 40 (24.8%). Among these, 35 (87.5%) of 40 underwent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative surgery. Of the 35 patients, 3 failed to follow-up. One-year survival following curative surgery was 87.5%. Stent helped to reduce vomiting and improve nutrition, measured by the body mass index (p = 0.36) and serum albumin (p = 0.05), over a 4-week period following stent insertion.

Conclusion:

Pyloric stents are useful in relieving malignant gastric outlet obstruction, maintaining nutrition during neo-adjuvant treatment and improving survival without additional risk of postoperative complications. They have traditionally been used for palliation, but should also be considered as bridging therapy for obstructing resectable gastric tumours during neo-adjuvant treatment.

Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy with Conversion Therapy in Gastric Outlet Obstruction Caused by Incurable Advanced Gastric Cancer

Purpose

The benefits of laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LGJ) combined with conversion therapy for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) caused by incurable advanced gastric cancer (AGC) are unclear. This study aimed to examine the feasibility and efficacy of LGJ followed by enteral nutrition and conversion therapy in malignant GOO.

Patients and Methods

The clinical outcomes for 66 patients with GOO due to incurable AGC were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were classified into multimodal therapy (LGJ, enteral nutrition, and chemotherapy, n = 35) and chemotherapy alone (n = 31) groups. Conversion surgery was defined as surgery aimed at R0 resection in initially incurable tumours.

Results

Compared to the chemotherapy group, multimodal therapy patients had improved oral intake, more chemotherapy cycles, better nutritional indices, less sarcopenia, and improved quality of life (QOL) post-treatment. Conversion surgery was performed in 17 multimodal therapy patients, with no perioperative mortality, and R0 resection achieved in 15 patients (88.2%). The median survival time of multimodal therapy patients was 16.7 months, compared to 4.5 months for chemotherapy patients. Multimodal therapy patients with conversion surgery had significantly longer overall survival than those without surgery (44.2 vs 8.5 months, respectively, P< 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified multimodal therapy and improved or stable QOL as independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion

Multimodal therapy was associated with better nutritional and metabolic status, a safely induced high conversion surgery rate with a high R0 resection rate, and a good prognosis. LGJ with enteral nutrition and conversion therapy may improve long-term survival in obstructive incurable AGC.

Nutritional Support Indications in Gastroesophageal Cancer Patients: From Perioperative to Palliative Systemic Therapy. A Comprehensive Review of the Last Decade

Gastric cancer treatments are rapidly evolving, leading to significant survival benefit. Recent evidence provided by clinical trials strongly encouraged the use of perioperative chemotherapy as standard treatment for the localized disease, whereas in the advanced disease setting, molecular characterization has improved patients’ selection for tailored therapeutic approaches, including molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy. The role of nutritional therapy is widely recognized, with oncologic treatment’s tolerance and response being better in well-nourished patients. In this review, literature data on strategies or nutritional interventions will be critically examined, with particular regard to different treatment phases (perioperative, metastatic, and palliative settings), with the aim to draw practical indications for an adequate nutritional support of gastric cancer patients and provide an insight on future directions in nutritional strategies. We extensively analyzed the last 10 years of literature, in order to provide evidence that may fit current clinical practice both in terms of nutritional interventions and oncological treatment. Overall, 137 works were selected: 34 Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs), 12 meta-analysis, 9 reviews, and the most relevant prospective, retrospective and cross-sectional studies in this setting. Eleven ongoing trials have been selected from clinicaltrial.gov as representative of current research. One limitation of our work lies in the heterogeneity of the described studies, in terms of sample size, study procedures, and both nutritional and clinical outcomes. Indeed, to date, there are no specific evidence-based guidelines in this fields, therefore we proposed a clinical algorithm with the aim to indicate an appropriate nutritional strategy for gastric cancer patients.

Endoscopic Double Stenting for the Management of Combined Malignant Biliary and Duodenal Obstruction

Periampullary cancers are often diagnosed at advanced stages and can cause both biliary and duodenal obstruction. As these two obstructions reduce patients’ performance status and quality of life, appropriate management of the disease is important. Combined malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction is classified according to the location and timing of the duodenal obstruction, which also affect treatment options. Traditionally, surgical bypass (gastrojejunostomy and hepaticojejunostomy) has been performed for the treatment of unresectable periampullary cancer. However, it has recently been substituted by less invasive endoscopic procedures due to its high morbidity and mortality. Thus, endoscopic double stenting (transpapillary stenting and enteral stenting) has become the current standard of care. Limitations of transpapillary stenting include its technical difficulty and the risk of duodenal-biliary reflux. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided procedures have emerged as a novel platform and have been increasingly utilized in the management of biliary and duodenal obstruction. As the prognosis of periampullary cancer has improved due to recent advances in chemotherapy, treatment strategies for biliary and duodenal obstruction are becoming more important. In this article, we review the treatment strategies for combined malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction based on the latest evidence.

Staged laparoscopic management of locally advanced gastric cancer with outlet obstruction

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer with outlet obstruction is poor. Gastrectomy with curative intent is often initially impossible or difficult.

OBJECTIVE

We report our experience of curative distal gastrectomy after laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy and fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) chemotherapy to examine the feasibility and safety of this modified strategy for locally advanced gastric cancer with outlet obstruction, initially deemed unresectable.

METHODS

Between October 2017 and June 2019, 15 patients diagnosed with locally advanced gastric cancer with outlet obstruction sequentially underwent gastrojejunostomy, received four cycles of FLOT chemotherapy, and underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with curative intent (R0 resection + D2 lymphadenectomy). Clinical data were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

R0 resection was possible in 12/15 patients, laparoscopically in 11, and one conversion to laparotomy was necessary. There was no perioperative mortality in the 12 patients. Pathologic evaluation of the resected specimens revealed that complete tumor grade regression 1a (TRG1a), TRG1b, TRG2, and TRG3 occurred in 3, 2, 4, and 3 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This case series showed that curative surgical resection was feasible as a staged approach for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer with outlet obstruction, after initial staged gastrojejunostomy and chemotherapy.

ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the management of benign and malignant gastroduodenal obstruction

This American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the endoscopic management of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). We applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to address key clinical questions. These include the comparison of (1) surgical gastrojejunostomy to the placement of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) for malignant GOO, (2) covered versus uncovered SEMS for malignant GOO, and (3) endoscopic and surgical interventions for the management of benign GOO. Recommendations provided in this document were founded on the certainty of the evidence, balance of benefits and harms, considerations of patient and caregiver preferences, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness.

Treatment option of endoscopic stent insertion or gastrojejunostomy for gastric outlet obstruction due to gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

There are currently two treatment options for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) due to gastric cancer, endoscopic stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy. However, their therapeutic effects have not yet been established. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to examine these effects.

METHODS

The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association invited its delegates to participate in a retrospective multicenter cohort study on patients with GOO due to gastric cancer who underwent stent therapy or gastrojejunostomy in 2015.

RESULTS

We obtained data from 85 patients undergoing stent therapy and 94 undergoing gastrojejunostomy from 42 hospitals. Baseline data revealed that stent patients had lower food intake, poorer performance status, and worse prognostic indices than gastrojejunostomy patients. Postoperative food intake and survival times were worse in stent patients than in gastrojejunostomy patients. We performed propensity score matching to select pairs of patients with similar baseline characteristics in the two treatment groups. After matching, the frequency of postoperative complications was significantly less in stent patients (3%, 1/33) than in gastrojejunostomy patients (21%, 7/34; p = 0.03). A low residue or full diet was achieved by 97% of stent patients (32/33) and 97% of gastrojejunostomy patients (33/34) (p = 0.98). Median survival times were 7.8 months in stent patients and 4.0 months in gastrojejunostomy patients (p = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Propensity score matching demonstrated that endoscopic stent placement resulted in less postoperative morbidity than and a similar food intake and equivalent survival times to gastrojejunostomy. These results suggest the utility of stent therapy.

Big End Double-Layer Stents for the Treatment of Gastric Outlet Obstruction Caused by Stomach Cancer

Objectives

This study is aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of the big end double-layer uncovered self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) for the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) caused by distal stomach cancer.

Methods

Seventy three patients receiving big end double-layer uncovered SEMS for the treatment of GOO caused by distal gastric cancer will be included in this multicenter prospective clinical trial. The main outcome measures included the functional outcome, the complications, the reinterventional rates, the average treatment charges, and the mean survival time. Monthly telephone calls were needed to assess the food intake until the patients died.

Results

The technical and the clinical success rates were 98.6%. The stent obstruction caused by tumor ingrowth was observed in one patient (1.4%). The incidence of food impaction was 2.9% (2/70) and the reinterventional rate was 4.3% (3/70). However, stent migration and obstruction caused by overgrowth were not observed. No perforation and severe bleeding were observed. The median cost of endoscopic stenting and total hospitalization (including reinterventions) for the big end double-layer uncovered SEMS in this study was $2945 and $3408, respectively. The mean survival time was 212.5 days.

Conclusions

The placement of big end double-layer uncovered SEMS is a safe and effective modality and has the potential to be one of the options for the treatment of GOO caused by the distal gastric cancer.

Stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy versus stent placement for the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction

INTRODUCTION

Gastric outlet obstruction is a complication of advanced tumors. It causes upper gastrointestinal obstruction, with progressive malnutrition and reduced survival. Currently, gastrojejunostomy or stent placement (SP) are feasible alternatives for the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and survival of both techniques.

METHODS

Single-center observational and prospective study of 58 patients with gastric outlet obstruction who underwent surgical treatment with stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy (SPGJ) or SP with self-expanding intraluminal prostheses between 2007 and 2018.

RESULTS

Thirty patients underwent SPGJ and 28 SP. The mean age of the first group was significantly lower (69 vs. 78 years, respectively; P=.001). There were no statistically significant differences in terms of sex, perioperative risk or tumor etiology. Postoperative complications were non-significantly higher in the SPGJ group (P=.156). SP was associated with a shorter hospital stay (P=.02) and faster oral intake (P<.0001). However, SP had significantly higher rates of persistent and recurrent obstruction (P=.048 and .01, respectively), poorer energy targets (P=.009) and shorter survival (9.61 vs. 4.47 months; P=.008).

CONCLUSIONS

SPGJ presents greater luminal permeability, better oral intake and greater survival than SP. SP is preferable for non-surgical patients with a limited short-term prognosis.

Superiority of Gastrojejunostomy Over Endoscopic Stenting for Palliation of Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) in patients with malignancies causes nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, malnutrition, and dehydration. Endoscopic placement of self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) and gastrojejunostomy are the 2 main palliative options. We aimed to compare the outcomes of endoscopic SEMS placement with gastrojejunostomy in a propensity score matched study and identified factors associated with clinical success.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with malignant GOO who underwent endoscopic SEMS placement (n = 183) or gastrojejunostomy (n = 127) from 2011 through 2017 at a tertiary academic medical center. Clinical success was defined as successful resumption of oral intake and relief of obstructive symptoms after either procedure. A propensity score matched analysis was conducted to compare clinical success rate, luminal patency duration, survival length, and adverse outcomes. We performed multivariable analyses to identify factors associated with clinical success.

RESULTS

Proportions of patients with clinical success did not differ significantly between the SMES group (79.4%) and the gastrojejunostomy group (80.1%) (P = .83). The mean patency duration and survival lengths were significantly longer in the gastrojejunostomy group (169.2 and 193.4 days respectively), compared to the endoscopic stenting group (96.5 and 119.9 days respectively). Poor performance status, presence of ascites and low albumin were independent risk factors for failure of enteral stenting and gastrojejunostomy.

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective analysis of patients with GOO, due to cancer, who underwent endoscopic SEMS placement or gastrojejunostomy, we found gastrojejunostomy to provide significant increases in patency duration and survival time. Gastrojejunostomy should therefore be considered the primary treatment option for patients with good performance status and reasonable survival expectancy. Nutritional status, the absence of ascites, and pre-procedure performance status are associated with clinical success.