Risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniations

Patient Factors Associated with Recurrent Herniation and Revision Surgery following Lumbar Microdiscectomy

Introduction

Lumbar microdiscectomy is a commonly conducted surgical procedure for treating symptomatic lumbar disc herniations. Recurrence of herniation is a common cause of poor outcomes and the need for revision surgery, which occurs in as many as 21% of patients following primary discectomy. Identifying factors that are associated with the recurrence of herniation may be valuable for risk stratification and patient counseling. This study aimed to explore the relationship between various patient demographic variables and comorbidities and rates of reoperation after primary lumbar microdiscectomy.

Methods

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients who were undergoing single-level primary lumbar microdiscectomy between 2016 and 2022. Eligibility for inclusion was determined by age >18 years and current procedural terminology codes 63030 and 63042. Patients with preoperative sepsis or cancer were excluded. Patient demographics, including age, race, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI), and various comorbidities were compared between cohorts. To determine factors independently associated with the need for revision microdiscectomy, multivariable Poisson regressions were utilized.

Results

In this study, a total of 65,121 primary discectomy patients were included, with a separate cohort of 6,971 patients undergoing revision discectomy. In comparison with primary patients, the revision cohort was older and had higher proportions of female and non-Hispanic White patients (all c0.001). The odds ratio for revision discectomy was greater in patients aged ≥65 years (1.577, 95% CI [1.480, 1.680]) than in those aged <45 years (p>0.001). The odds ratio for revision was lower in Black (0.821, 95% CI [0.738, 0.914]) and Hispanic patients (0.819, 95% CI [0.738, 0.909]) when compared with non-Hispanic White patients (p<0.001). Obese patients with BMI ≥35 (1.193, 95% CI [1.103, 1.290]) were at greater risk of revision than those with BMI <25 (p<0.001). Diabetes (1.326, 95% CI [1.242, 1.416], p<0.001), functional dependence (1.411, 95% CI [1.183, 1.683], p<0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (1.315, 95% CI [1.137, 1.512], p<0.001), hypertension (1.398, 95% CI [1.330, 1.470], p<0.001), and smoking (1.082, 95% CI [1.018, 1.151], p=0.012) were associated with greater risk of revision. Poisson log-linear regression demonstrated sex (χ 2=19.9, p<0.001), race (χ 2=39.5, p<0.001), diabetes (χ 2=10.1, p=0.001), smoking (χ 2=18.5, p<0.001), hypertension (χ 2=16.4, p<0.001), age (χ 2=102.4, p<0.001), and BMI (χ 2=4.7, p=0.029) as significant predictors of revision, with steroid use (χ 2=3.5, p=0.061) and functional status (χ 2=3.7, p=0.055) approaching significance.

Conclusions

Patient demographics, comorbidities, and rehabilitative status may be significantly associated with rates of reherniation and revision surgery following lumbar microdiscectomy. We found that the significant predictors of revision surgery are functional dependence, advanced age, male sex, White race, obesity, diabetes, smoking, and hypertension. Early identification and attendance to the modifiable risk factors will aid patient guidance and outcomes following primary lumbar microdiscectomy.

Machine learning predictive model for lumbar disc reherniation following microsurgical discectomy

Introduction

The integration of machine learning (ML) algorithms into the field of neurosurgery has the potential to facilitate the decision-making process for the surgeons, improve the surgical outcomes and the overall patient satisfaction rates. Reoperations for same level lumbar disc reherniation are associated with poorer outcomes and greater rate of complications.

Research question

Proper preoperative patient evaluation could reveal the individuals at higher risk of reherniation. A novel machine learning algorithm was used for the creation of a predictive scoring system for lumbar disc reherniation for patients requiring microdiscectomy without fusion.

Material and methods

Retrospective chart review was completed of all adult patients that underwent microdiscectomy without fusion for symptomatic single level LDH, in a single center, over the last 3 years. 230 patients met the inclusion criteria. 19 of them required a second surgical intervention due to same level reherniation.

Results

Utilizing the Risk-SLIM model, the Lumbar Reherniation Score (LRS) was created. The score's accuracy was tested against other model architectures, and a standard five-fold cross-validation was performed. The LRS has AUC of 0.87, confusion matrix accuracy of 0.74, Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.36 and informedness of 0.62. The LRS individual reherniation risk probability ranges from 0% to 88.1%.

Discussion and conclusion

The LRS is a novel, easy-to-use, patient-specific tool for preoperative prediction of the individual patient-specific risk of same level symptomatic reherniation following microdiscectomy. Further validation and testing of the model is needed before it can be used in real-life patient treatment.

Comparison of postoperative complications and outcomes following primary versus revision discectomy: A national database analysis

Background

Lumbar microdiscectomy is a surgical procedure that is frequently used in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar herniation. Differences in outcomes following primary and revision lumbar microdiscectomy have been previously studied, with reports of comparably satisfactory results from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. In this study, we further investigate these outcomes, including length of stay, bleeding events, and durotomy. We hypothesized that length of stay, incidence of bleeding events, and dural tear would be greater in the revision cohort.

Methods

The ACS-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients undergoing single-level primary and revision lumbar microdiscectomy between 2019 and 2022. Eligibility for inclusion was determined by age >18 years and current procedural terminology codes 63030 and 63042. Patients with preoperative sepsis or cancer were excluded. Length of stay, wound infection, bleeding events requiring transfusion, cerebrospinal fluid leak, dural tear, and neurological injury were compared between the cohorts. Multivariable Poisson regression adjusted for demographics and comorbidities, including age, sex, race, body mass index, diabetes, smoking, and hypertension, was used to determine if revision was predictive of complications.

Results

A total of 37,669 patients were included, of whom 3,635 (9.6%) required revision surgery. Patients in the revision cohort were older (54.25 ± 15.7 vs. 50.85 ± 16.0 years, P < 0.001) and had higher proportions of male (59.0% vs. 55.7%, P < 0.001) and non-Hispanic White patients (82.0% vs. 77.4%, P < 0.001). Length of stay (1.11 ± 2.5 vs. 1.58 ± 2.7, P < 0.001) and rates of wound infection (2.1% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.002) and bleeding events requiring transfusion (1.3% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001) were greater in the revision cohort compared to primary patients. Differences in cerebrospinal fluid leak (0.2% vs. 0.1%, P = 0.116), dural tear complication (0.01% vs. 0.01%, P = 0.092), and neurological injury (0.008% vs. 0.006%, P = 0.691) between the revision and primary cohorts were nonsignificant. Poisson log-linear regression adjusted for demographics and comorbidities demonstrated revision as a significant predictor for length of stay (χ 2 = 462.95, P < 0.001), wound infection (χ 2 = 9.22, P = 0.002), and bleeding events (χ 2 = 9.74, P = 0.002), while it was a nonsignificant predictor of cerebrospinal fluid leak (χ 2 = 2.61, P = 0.106), dural tear (χ 2 = 2.37, P = 0.123), and neurological injury (χ 2 = 0.229, P = 0.632).

Conclusion

Revision surgery was a significant predictor of increased length of stay, wound infection, and bleeding events requiring transfusion. Surgeons and patients alike should be aware of increased risk for complications following revision lumbar microdiscectomy compared to primary discectomy.

The Three-Step Approach for Lumbar Disk Herniation with Anatomical Insights Tailored for the Next Generation of Young Spine Surgeons

Background/Objectives: Lumbar disc herniation, a complex challenge in spinal health, significantly impacts individuals across diverse age groups. This article delves into the intricacies of this condition, emphasising the pivotal role of anatomical considerations in its understanding and management. Additionally, lumbar discectomy might be considered an "easy" surgery; nevertheless, it carries significant risks. The aim of the study was to present a groundbreaking "three-step approach" with some anatomical insight derived from our comprehensive clinical experiences, designed to systematise the surgical approach and optimise the outcomes, especially for young spine surgeons. We highlighted the purpose of the study and introduced our research question(s) and the context surrounding them. Methods: This retrospective study involved patients treated for lumbar disc herniation at a single institution. The patient demographics, surgical details, and postoperative assessments were meticulously recorded. All surgeries were performed by a consistent surgical team. Results: A total of 847 patients of the 998 patients initially included completed the follow-up period. A three-step approach was performed for every patient. The recurrence rate was 1.89%. Furthermore, the incidence of lumbar instability and the need for reoperation were carefully examined, presenting a holistic view of the outcomes. Conclusions: The three-step approach emerged as a robust and effective strategy for addressing lumbar disc herniation. This structured approach ensures a safe and educational experience for young spinal surgeons.

The Importance of Spinopelvic Parameters in Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate preoperative spinopelvic mismatch as a risk factor for recurrent lumbar disk herniation (RLDH) in patients undergoing lumbar disk herniation (LDH) surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spinopelvic parameters have been associated with lumbar degenerative diseases, particularly LDH. However, the relationship between these parameters and RLDH has yet to be studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of 1453 patients aged ≥18 who underwent single-level, unilateral fenestration microdiscectomy for the first time in our hospital between 2013 and 2019 were reviewed. The study group comprised 88 patients who underwent surgery for RLDH. The control group comprised 101 randomly selected patients who underwent surgery for LDH but not RLDH. Age, sex, body mass index, occupational activity level, operative level, Roussouly classification type, and time to recurrence were recorded. Moreover, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis (LL), interverteberal disk height (IDH), segmental lordosis, sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral table angle (ST) were measured for each patient. Pelvic mismatch was calculated.

RESULTS

Mean age was 46.5±11.4 y (range, 20-70). Both groups were similar concerning age, sex, body mass index, occupational activity level, and level of surgery. The mean time to recurrence was 167.3±36.6 d (range, 62-363). Measurements in the RLDH group were as follows: IDH=7.6±1.5 mm, pelvic incidence =54.4°±10.1°, LL=47.3°±13°, segmental lordosis =9.3°±5°, SS=35.1°±9.9°, and PT=19.3°±7.3°. Mean IDH was significantly lower in the RLDH group ( P =0.02). Less LL and lower PT at L3-4 level and increased SS at L5-S1 level were considered risk factors for RLDH.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that preoperative low IDH is at higher risk for RLDH in patients undergoing LDH surgery. LL, PT, and SS may be risk factors for specific levels.

Effect of Glycemic Disorders and Habits on the Concentration of Selected Neurotrophic Factors in Patients with Lumbosacral Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

BACKGROUND

Unhealthy habits, such as overeating processed and high-calorie foods, alcohol abuse, and smoking, negatively impact human health. It has been suggested that the inflammatory process and the resulting growth of nerve fibers within the intervertebral disc (IVD) fissures is the main reason for the pain accompanying IVD degeneration (IVDD).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine whether smoking, alcohol consumption, overweight/obesity, or diabetes comorbidity contribute to the development of IVDD and how the aforementioned factors affect the levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), and growth associated protein 43 (GAP-43) in the study and control groups (intervertebral discs, IVDs from cadavers, and serum samples from voluntary blood donors).

METHODS

The study group comprised 113 patients diagnosed with IVDD who qualified for microdiscectomy. Two control groups (I and II) were used in this study. The first included 81 IVDs obtained from Caucasian human cadavers. Control group II, on the other hand, included serum samples obtained from 113 voluntary blood donors. The expression profiles of BDNF, GDNF, and GAP-43 were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

Our statistical analysis confirmed that patients who were overweight/obese, smoked tobacco, consumed alcohol, or had diabetes had a higher risk of IVDD (OR > 1). Statistical analysis showed that BDNF, GAP-43, and GDNF concentrations were significantly higher in the IVDs and serum samples obtained from the study group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). In addition, higher levels of BDNF, GDNF, and GAP-43 were noted in IVDD patients who consumed alcohol, smoked tobacco, were overweight/obese, or had comorbid diabetes compared to patients without these risk factors (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

We showed that changes in energy metabolism, habits, and lifestyle, as well as the degenerative process of IVD in the lumbosacral spine contribute to changing the concentration profile of the analyzed neurotrophic factors.

Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: Does Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Lead to Better Clinical and Radiological Outcomes than Redo-Discectomy?

STUDY DESIGN

randomized, prospective, and level I clinical study.

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes and radiological findings of revision discectomy alone versus revision discectomy with fusion as surgical treatment for recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RDH).

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

RDH is a common complication following a primary discectomy. The optimal surgical procedure for RDH is still debated.

METHODS

Sixty patients with RDH were randomly divided into two equal groups: the first group underwent revision discectomy alone and the second underwent revision discectomy with fusion. The primary outcomes evaluated were Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for low back and limb pains, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), disc height indexes, foraminal height index, and disc height subsidence. Secondary outcomes included operative time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and complications.

RESULTS

Revision discectomy with fusion showed superior pain relief and improved functional outcomes, including better VAS scores for both back and leg pain and ODI at 24-month follow-up. Additionally, it restored the stability of the spine better with lower disc height subsidence without significant complications. However, these advantages came at the cost of increased blood loss and longer operative time and hospital stays.

CONCLUSIONS

Revision discectomy with fusion is recommended for RDH; however, the choice of the procedure should be made caseby- case basis, considering many factors related to the patient and surgical facilities.

How to spot the recurring lumbar disc? Risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) in adult patients with lumbar disc prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Despite a fast-growing evidence-base examining the relationship of certain clinical and radiological factors such as smoking, BMI and herniation-type with rLDH, there remains much debate around which factors are clinically important. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) in adults after primary discectomy. A systematic literature search was carried out using Ovid-Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Web of Science databases from inception to 23rd June-2022. Observational studies of adult patients with radiologically-confirmed rLDH after ≥3 months of the initial surgery were included, and their quality assessed using the Quality-In-Prognostic-Studies (QUIPS) appraisal tool. Meta-analyses of univariate and multivariate data and a sensitivity-analysis for rLDH post-microdiscectomy were performed. Twelve studies (n=4497, mean age:47.3; 34.5% female) were included, and 11 studies (n=4235) meta-analysed. The mean follow-up was 38.4 months. Mean recurrence rate was 13.1% and mean time-to-recurrence was 24.1 months (range: 6-90 months). Clinically, older age (OR:1.04, 95%CI:1.00-1.08, n=1014), diabetes mellitus (OR:3.82, 95%CI:1.58-9.26, n=2330) and smoking (OR:1.80, 95%CI:1.03- 3.14, n=3425) increased likelihood of recurrence. Radiologically, Modic-change type-2 (OR:7.93, 95%CI:5.70-11.05, n=1706) and disc extrusion (OR:12.23, 95%CI:8.60-17.38, n=1706) increased likelihood of recurrence. The evidence did not support an association between rLDH and sex; BMI; occupational labour/driving; alcohol-consumption; Pfirmann- grade, or herniation-level. Older patients, smokers, patients with diabetes, those with type-2 Modic-changes or disc extrusion are more likely to experience rLDH. Higher quality studies with robust adjustment of confounders are required to determine the clinical bearing of all other potential risk factors for rLDH.

Moderate to Severe Multifidus Fatty Atrophy is the Risk Factor for Recurrence After Microdiscectomy of Lumbar Disc Herniation

OBJECTIVE

We attempted to investigate the potential risk factors of recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) after tubular microdiscectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent tubular microdiscectomy. The clinical and radiological factors were compared between the patients with and without rLDH.

RESULTS

This study included 350 patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) who underwent tubular microdiscectomy. The overall recurrence rate was 5.7% (20 of 350). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at the final follow-up significantly improved compared with those preoperatively. There was no significant difference in the preoperative VAS score and ODI between the rLDH and non-rLDH groups, while the leg pain VAS score and ODI of the rLDH group were significantly higher than those of the non-rLDH group at final follow-up. This suggested that rLDH patients had a worse prognosis than non-rLDH patients even after reoperation. There were no significant differences in sex, age, body mass index, diabetes, current smoking and drinking, disc height index, sagittal range of motion, facet orientation, facet tropism, Pfirrmann grade, Modic changes, interdisc kyphosis, and large LDH between the 2 groups. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that rLDH was associated with hypertension, multilevel microdiscectomy, and moderate-severe multifidus fatty atrophy (MFA). A multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that MFA was the sole and strongest risk factor for rLDH after tubular microdiscectomy.

CONCLUSION

Moderate-severe MFA was a risk factor for rLDH after tubular microdiscectomy, which can serve as an important reference for surgeons in formulating surgical strategies and the assessment of prognosis.

Recurrence of lumbar disk herniation after microdiscectomy: a two-center retrospective analysis of 1214 cases and identification of risk factors

Background/aim

To present the incidence of recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) and to identify radiological and patient-related risk factors that lead to recurrence after lumbar disc herniation (LDH) treatment with microdiscectomy.

Materials and methods

Between January 2013 and December 2021, 1214 patients who had undergone microdiscectomy for LDH were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups, the recurrent group and the non-recurrent group, and their demographic, clinical and radiologic characteristics were recorded. The association between the variables and RLDH was assessed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results

Mean ages were similar in the recurrent (51.48 ± 13.63) and non-recurrent(50.38 ± 14.53) groups (p=0.232). Males represented 59.6% of the recurrent group and 49.8% of the non-recurrent group (p=0.002). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that being a male (p=0.009), diabetes mellitus (p=0.038), smoking (p<0.001), grade 4&5 disc degeneration (p<0.001), and having protruded (p=0.002), extruded LDH (p<0.001), paracentral (p=0.008) and foraminal LDH (p=0.008) were independently associated with recurrence.

Conclusion

To reduce RLDH frequency and need for revision surgery, modifiable risk factors should be minimized before and after the initial surgery. Also, in patients with unmodifiable risk factors, patients should be clearly informed about the risk for recurrence and possible alternative treatment methods should be considered.

Effectiveness of moxibustion alone on lumbar disc herniation: a Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the available evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of moxibustion alone for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) treatment.

METHODS

A systematic search of 10 databases (until August 30, 2021) was used to identify studies that reported the response rate, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. Study selection and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers. Cochrane criteria for risk of bias were used to assess the methodological quality of the trials. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Methodology (GRADE) were also used to test the quality of the result evidence.

RESULTS

Nineteen RCTs, including 1888 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Five studies showed no difference between moxibustion and acupuncture on response rate [risk ratio () = 1.07, 95%(0.98, 1.16), = 0.11]. Meanwhile, six studies suggested that there is no significant difference between moxibustion and acupuncture on VAS score [mean difference () = －0.43, 95% (－0.91, 0.05), = 0.08]. Eight studies implied that there is no significant difference between moxibustion and acupuncture on JOA score [ = 0.84, 95% (－1.27, 2.96), = 0.44]. Two studies indicated that moxibustion may have equivalent effects for treating LDH in the VAS score in comparison with drug therapy [ = －1.16, 95% (－2.63, 0.31), = 0.12]. The evidence level of results was determined to be very low to low.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the existing evidence, moxibustion may not be suitable for treating LDH alone, but it may be applied as an adjuvant treatment. Furthermore, welldesigned RCTs with high quality and larger samples are still needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of moxibustion alone for LDH treatment.

Study on the efficacy and safety of the combination of Shi's manual therapy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomy for lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common chronic musculoskeletal disorder that seriously affects quality of life. The percutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomy (PELD) technique was developed to address spinal nerve root compression through direct visualization of pathological findings while minimizing tissue destruction upon exposure. It is an effective and safe treatment for LDH. However, recurrent LDH is a major concern after lumbar discectomy for primary LDH. A considerable number of clinical studies have reported that patients with LDH with radiculopathy could benefit from manual therapy. Shi's manual therapy (SMT) was established based on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) theory and has been shown to have a superior effect in alleviating muscle tension and loosening joints to improve lumbar and leg pain, radiculopathy, stiffness, activity discomfort, and related disorders. However, there is a lack of high-quality clinical evidence to support this conclusion. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of Shi's manual therapy (SMT) and PELD for LDH with radiculopathy.

METHODS/DESIGN

A multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a 1-year follow-up period will be performed. A total of 510 participants with LDH with radiculopathy will be recruited from four clinical centers. The sample size was estimated, and statistical analysis will be performed and supervised by biostatisticians from an independent third-party research institution. Two hundred fifty-five subjects will be randomly allocated to each group. The subjects in the control group will undergo PELD. Participants in the intervention group will be treated with a combination of SMT and PELD. Recurrence rate is the primary endpoint and the survival analysis of recurrence rate is the secondary endpoint, and the primary analysis of recurrence rate is the chi-square test and the secondary analysis of recurrence rate is survival analysis. The primary outcome measure is the recurrence rate of LDH with radiculopathy at the 1-year follow-up after treatment. The secondary outcome measures will be the ODI score, the VAS score for pain for the lumbar spine and lower limbs, the straight leg raise angle, the stability of the operated lumbar segment, and the SF-36 scores. Assessments will occur at baseline, postoperation, and 1 week, 4 weeks, 13 weeks, 26 weeks, and 1 year postoperation. In addition, adverse events related to clinical symptoms and signs and the results of laboratory tests will be documented during the clinical trials.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide reliable evidence of the effectiveness and safety of the combination of SMT and PELD for LDH with radiculopathy. If the results are favorable, it is expected that patients with LDH with radiculopathy will benefit from this study, and many patients could gain a good alternative treatment for LDH with radiculopathy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

China Registered Clinical Trial Registration Center ChiCTR2000036515 . Registered on 13 November 2020.

Application of Wearable Sensors Technology for Lumbar Spine Kinematic Measurements during Daily Activities following Microdiscectomy Due to Severe Sciatica

Simple Summary

The recurrence rate after lumbar spine disc surgeries is estimated to be 5–15%. Lumbar spine flexion of more than 10° is mentioned in the literature as the most harmful load to the operated disc level that could lead to recurrence during the first six postoperative weeks. The purpose of this study is to quantify flexions during daily living following such surgeries, for six weeks postoperatively, using wearable sensors technology. These data determine the patients’ kinematic pattern, reflecting a high-risk factor for pathology recurrence. The operated patients were measured to have 30% normal lumbar motion after the first postoperative week, while they were restored to almost 75% at the end of the sixth, respectively. Further in vitro studies should be carried out using these data to identify if such kinematic patterns could lead to pathology recurrence.

Abstract

Background: The recurrence rate of lumbar spine microdiscectomies (rLSMs) is estimated to be 5–15%. Lumbar spine flexion (LSF) of more than 10° is mentioned as the most harmful load to the intervertebral disc that could lead to recurrence during the first six postoperative weeks. The purpose of this study is to quantify LSFs, following LSM, at the period of six weeks postoperatively. Methods: LSFs were recorded during the daily activities of 69 subjects for 24 h twice per week, using Inertial Measurement Units (IMU). Results: The mean number of more than 10 degrees of LSFs per hour were: 41.3/h during the 1st postoperative week (P.W.) (29.9% healthy subjects-H.S.), 2nd P.W. 60.1/h (43.5% H.S.), 3rd P.W. 74.2/h (53.7% H.S.), 4th P.W. 82.9/h (60% H.S.), 5th P.W. 97.3/h (70.4% H.S.) and 6th P.W. 105.5/h (76.4% H.S.). Conclusions: LSFs constitute important risk factors for rLDH. Our study records the lumbar spine kinematic pattern of such patients for the first time during their daily activities. Patients’ data report less sagittal plane movements than healthy subjects. In vitro studies should be carried out, replicating our results to identify if such a kinematic pattern could cause rLDH. Furthermore, IMU biofeedback capabilities could protect patients from such harmful movements.

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and traditional laminectomy in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation

A few years ago, percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) began to prevail in clinical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH), whereas traditional laminectomy (TL) was treated earlier in RLDH than PTED. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of PTED and TL in the treatment of RLDH.Between November 2012 and October 2017, retrospective analysis of 48 patients with RLDH who were treated at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei and Department of Orthopaedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. Perioperative evaluation indicators included operation time, the intraoperative blood loss, length of incision and hospitalization time. Clinical outcomes were measured preoperatively, and at 1 days, 3 months, and 12 months postoperatively. The patients' lower limb pain was evaluated using Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. The ODI is the most widely-used assessment method internationally for lumbar or leg pain at present. Every category comprises 6 options, with the highest score for each question being 5 points. higher scores represent more serious dysfunction. The VAS is the most commonly-used quantitative method for assessing the degree of pain in clinical practice. The measurement method is to draw a 10 cm horizontal line on a piece of paper, 1 end of which is 0, indicating no pain, which the other end is 10, which means severe pain, and the middle part indicates different degree of pain.Compared with the TL group, the operation time, postoperative bed-rest time, and hospitalization time of the PTED group were significantly shorter, and the intraoperative blood loss was also reduced. These differences were statistically significant (P < .01). There were no significant differences in VAS or ODI scores between the two groups before or after surgery (P > .05).PTED and TL have similar clinical efficacy in the treatment of RLDH, but PTED can shorten the operation time, postoperative bed-rest time and hospitalization time, and reduce intraoperative blood loss, so the PTED is a safe and effective surgical method for the treatment of RLDH than TL, but more randomized controlled trials are still required to further verify these conclusions.

Regulation of the inflammatory cycle by a controllable release hydrogel for eliminating postoperative inflammation after discectomy

Surgery is the final choice for most patients with intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD). Operation-caused trauma will cause inflammation in the intervertebral disc. Serious inflammation will cause tissue defects and induce tissue degeneration, IDD recurrence and the occurrence of other diseases. Therefore, we proposed a scheme to treat recurrence after discectomy by inhibiting inflammation with an aspirin (ASP)-loaded hydrogel to restore the mechanical stability of the spine and relieve local inflammation. ASP-liposomes (ASP-Lips) were incorporated into a photocrosslinkable gelatin-methacryloyl (GelMA) via mixing. This material can effectively alleviate inflammation by inhibiting the release of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. We further assessed the expression of inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and degeneration-related factors, such as type II collagen (COL-2), Aggrecan, matrix metallopeptidases-3 (MMP-3), MMP-13, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs-4 (ADAMTS-4) and ADAMTS-5 in rat nucleus pulpous cells. The level of IDD was analyzed through H&E, safranin-O staining and immunohistochemistry in rabbit samples. In vitro, we found that ASP-Lip@GelMA treatment significantly decreased inflammatory cytokines, MMP-3 and -13, and ADAMTS-4 and -5 and up-regulated COL-2 and Aggrecan via the inhibited release of HMGB-1 from the nucleus. In vivo, ASP-Lip@GelMA can effectively inhibit inflammation of local tissue after disc surgery and fill local tissue defects. This composite hydrogel system is a promising way to treat the recurrence of IDD after surgery without persistent complications.

Risk factors for early reherniation after lumbar discectomy with or without annular closure: results of a multicenter randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Reherniation after lumbar discectomy is classified as a failure and occurs in 3 to 18% of cases. Various risk factors for reherniation such as age, sex, body mass index, smoking, and size of annular defect have been reported. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for early reherniation after one-level lumbar discectomy with or without annular closure within 3 months after surgery.

METHODS

This study is based on data analysis of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial in Europe. Patients included underwent standard lumbar discectomy-with or without implantation of an annular closure device (ACD). Enrollment of 554 patients in 21 centers in Europe (Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Belgium, The Netherlands, and France) started in 2010 and was completed in October 2014. A total of 276 patients were randomized to the ACD group (ACG) and 278 patients to the control group (CG).

RESULTS

Four (1.5%) symptomatic reherniations occurred in the ACG and 18 (6.5%) in the CG. In the overall population, a significant correlation was found with recurrent herniation for disc degeneration (Pfirrmann p = 0.009) and a trend for current smoker status (p = 0.07). In CG, age ≥ 50 years (p = 0.05) and disc degeneration (Pfirrmann p = 0.026, Kellgren and Lawrence p = 0.013) were predictive factors for reherniation.

CONCLUSION

In the current study, risk factors for early recurrent disc herniation after lumbar discectomy were age ≥ 50 years and moderate disc degeneration. The annular closure device reduced the risk of early reherniation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01283438.

Clinical outcome of biportal endoscopic revisional lumbar discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation

BACKGROUND

Although literature provides evidence regarding the superiority of surgery over conservative treatment in patients with lumbar disc herniation, recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) was the indication for reoperation in 62% of the cases. The major problem with revisional lumbar discectomy (RLD) is that the epidural scar tissue is not clearly isolated from the boundaries of the dura matter and nerve roots; therefore, unintended durotomy and nerve root injury may occur. The biportal endoscopic (BE) technique is a newly emerging minimally invasive spine surgical modality. However, clinical evidence regarding BE-RLD remains limited. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes after performing open microscopic (OM)-RLD and BE-RLD to evaluate the feasibility of BE-RLD.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 36 patients who were diagnosed with RLDH and underwent OM-RLD and BE-RLD. RLDH is defined as the presence of herniated disc material at the level previously operated upon in patients who have experienced a pain-free phase for more than 6 months. BE-RLD was performed as follows: two independent surgical ports were made inside the medial pedicular line of the target segment and on the intact upper and lower laminas. Peeling off the soft tissue from the vertebral lamina helps to easily identify the traversing nerve root and the recurrent disc material without dealing with the fibrotic scar tissue. Clinical outcomes were obtained using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the modified Macnab criteria before and at 2 days, 2 and 6 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The data of 20 and 16 patients who underwent OM-RLD and BE-RLD, respectively, were evaluated. The demographic and perioperative data were comparable between the groups. During the year following the surgery, in the BE-RLD group, the VAS scores at each point were significantly improved over the baseline and remained improved up to 2 weeks after surgery (p < 0.05); however, no statistical difference between the two groups was observed after 6 weeks of surgery (p > 0.05). According to the modified Macnab criteria on the follow-up, the excellent or good satisfaction rates reported at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery were 81.25%, 81.25%, 75%, and 81.25%, respectively, in the BE-RLD group, and 50%, 75%, 75%, and 80%, respectively, in the OM-RLD group.

CONCLUSION

BE-RLD yielded similar outcomes to OM-RLD, including pain improvement, functional improvement, and patient satisfaction, at 1 year after surgery. However, faster pain relief, earlier functional recovery, and better patient satisfaction were observed when applying BE-LRD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered.

Surgical outcomes of full endoscopic spinal surgery for lumbar disc herniation over a 10-year period: A retrospective study

Objective

Full endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) has become popular in recent years. Previous studies have proven the efficacy, but few have discussed the possible risk factors of poor outcome. In this study, we reviewed patients who underwent FELD at Changhua Christian Hospital in the past 10 years and sought to identify factors associated with poor surgical outcomes and re-operations.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed records from mid-2009 to mid-2018. Patients had undergone FELD and follow-up for ≥1 year were included. Factors included in the outcome evaluations were age, sex, surgical time, body mass index, surgical methods, disc herniation type, extension of herniation, degree of canal compromised, disc degenerative grade, smoking and alcohol use, surgical lumbar level, symptom duration, Oswestry low back disability index, and visual analog scale score. We had evolved from inside-out methods to outside-in methods after 2016, thus, we included this factor in the analysis. The primary outcomes of interest were poor/fair MacNab score and re-operation.

Results

From mid-2009 to mid-2018, 521 patients met our criteria and were analyzed. The median follow-up was 1685 days (range, 523–3923 days). Thirty-one (6.0%) patients had poor surgical outcomes (fair/poor MacNab score) and 45 (8.6%) patients required re-operation. Prolapsed herniated disc (P < 0.001), higher disc degenerative grade (P = 0.047), higher lumbar level (P = 0.026), longer preoperative symptoms (P < 0.001), and surgery before 2017 (outside-in technique, P = 0.020) were significant factors associated with poor outcomes in univariate analyses. In multivariate analyses, prolapsed herniated disc (P < 0.001), higher disc degenerative grade (P = 0.030), and higher lumbar level (P = 0.046) were statistically significant. The most common adverse symptom was numbness. Factors possibly associated with higher re-operation rate were older age (P = 0.045), alcohol use (P = 0.073) and higher lumbar level (P = 0.069). Only alcohol use showed statistically significant re-operation rates in multivariate analyses (P = 0.035).

Conclusions

For treating LDH by FELD, we concluded that prolapsed disc, higher disc degenerative grade, higher lumbar level, and longer preoperative symptom duration were possibly associated with unsatisfactory surgical outcomes (poor/fair MacNab score). The outside-in technique might be superior to the inside-out technique. Older age and alcohol use might be associated with a higher re-operation rate.

Preoperative lumbar epidural steroid injections administered within 6 weeks of microdiscectomy are associated with increased rates of reoperation

PURPOSE

Lumbar epidural steroid injections (LESIs) are widely utilized for back pain. However, as studies report adverse effects from these injections, defining a safe interval for their use preoperatively is necessary. We investigated the effects of preoperative LESI timing on the rates of recurrent microdiscectomy.

METHODS

This study utilized the PearlDiver national insurance claims database. Microdiscectomy patients were stratified by the timing of their most recent LESI prior to surgery into bimonthly cohorts (0-2 months, 2-4 months, 4-6 months). This first cohort was further stratified into biweekly cohorts (0-2 weeks, 2-4 weeks, 4-6 weeks, 6-8 weeks). The 6-month reoperation rate was assessed and compared between each injection cohort and a control group of patients with no injections within 6 months before surgery. Univariate analyses of reoperation were conducted followed by multivariate analyses controlling for risk factors where appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 12,786 microdiscectomy patients were identified; 1090 (8.52%) received injections within 6 months before surgery. We observed a significant increase in the 6-month reoperation rates in patients who received injections within 6 weeks prior to surgery (odds ratio [OR] 1.900, 1.218-2.963; p = 0.005) compared to control. No other significant differences were observed.

DISCUSSION

In this study, microdiscectomy performed within 6 weeks following LESIs was associated with a higher risk of reoperation, while microdiscectomy performed more than 6 weeks from the most recent LESI demonstrated no such association with increased risk. Further research into the interaction between LESIs and recurrent disk herniation is necessary.

Acupuncture for lumbar disc herniation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

As development of society and change of modern life style, the prevalence of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) has been increasing. Being a major cause of low back pain, sciatica and radicular leg pain, LDH imposes a heavy burden on both individual and society. Because of high surgically intervene rate, non-invasive (non-surgical) treatments are recommended for most cases. Acupuncture has the advantages of low risk, good effect and low cost which has been proven that could alleviate pain while physical therapy plays a major role in the treatment of LDH in the vast majority of countries. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for LDH.

METHODS

RCTs on ACU treating LDH will be searched from the following databases: PubMed, Web of science, EmBase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang data, from their inception to May 2020. The primary outcomes are verbal rating scale and functional disability. Two reviewers will independently exclude substandard articles and extract eligible data. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0 for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Egger test will be used to assess the reporting bias. Heterogeneity will be evaluated by the I statistic and Q test. We will conduct the meta-analysis using Stata V12.0 to evaluate the effectiveness of ACU for LDH. In case of high heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis of different items and subgroup analysis will be performed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation System will be used to assess the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

The results of this review will be submitted to a journal for publication.

CONCLUSION

This proposed systematic review will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for LDH.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (registration number CRD42019148272).

Risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after discectomy

PURPOSE

There are many reports about the risk factors for recurrence after lumbar disc surgery. However, there are none about whether lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) are associated with recurrent lumbar disc herniation (LDH). We investigated various risk factors for recurrent LDH after discectomy including LSTV.

METHODS

A total of 119 patients who had undergone a discectomy for L4-5 disc herniation were evaluated with a minimum follow-up of two years. Clinical parameters including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and smoking status, and radiological parameters including type of herniated disc, degree of disc degeneration, LSTV, and sagittal range of motion (SROM) in flexion-extension radiography were evaluated. SROM was measured by the difference of the lordotic angle between the flexion and extension view.

RESULTS

Recurrent disc herniation at L4-5 developed in 21 (17.6%) of the 119 patients. The mean period between primary surgery and recurrence was 17.6 ± 21.1 months. LSTV was found in 11 (52.4%) of the 21 patients who had recurrence and seven (7.1%) of the 98 patients in the non-recurrent group. SROM at L4-5 was 11.68 ± 4.24° in the recurrent group and 9.04 ± 3.65° in the non-recurrent group with a significant difference (p = 0.004). Multiple logistic regression analyses confirmed that LSTV and a larger SROM were significant risk factors for recurrent disc herniation at L4-5.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and a hypermobile disc in flexion-extension radiography were found to be risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Polyurethane as a strategy for annulus fibrosus repair and regeneration: a systematic review

Aim: Disc herniation is a spine disease that leads to suffering and disability. Discectomy is a Janus-faced approach that relieves pain symptoms but leave the intervertebral discs predisposed to herniation. This systematic review discussed the mechanical and biological requirements for a polyurethane-based biomaterial to be used in annular repair. Methods: Search strategy was performed in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases to define the main mechanical properties, biological findings and follow-up aspects of these biomaterials. The range was limited to articles published from January 2000 to December 2017 in English language. Results: The search identified 82 articles. From these, a total of 18 articles underwent a full-text analysis, and 16 studies were included in the review. Conclusion: The polyurethane presents suitable properties to be used as an engineered solution to re-establish the microenvironment and biomechanical features of the intervertebral disc.

Smoking Is an Independent Risk Factor of Reoperation Due to Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study is to determine if age, gender, smoking status, and body mass index (BMI) are significant risk factors of symptomatic recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) leading to reoperation.

METHODS

A cohort of 1378 consecutive patients who underwent discectomy for LDH from June 2010 to January 2015 at our institution were included. Patients who underwent reoperation due to rLDH prior to August 2015 were identified. Data on reoperations, age, gender, smoking status, and BMI were collected from our database. A comparison of age, gender, smoking status, and BMI was made between the controls (non-rLDH) and the cases (rLDH group). Binary logistic regression was performed to determine whether age, gender, smoking status, and BMI were independent risk factors for rLDH.

RESULTS

Patients in the non-rLDH group (48.2 years) were older than the rLDH group (44.7 years; P = .013). Gender distribution (54.8% vs 48.5% males; P = .222) and BMI (26.6 vs 26.6; P = .458) were similar between the 2 groups. A significantly higher prevalence of smokers was found in the rLDH group (33.1% vs 51.5%; P < .001). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that smoking was an independent risk factor of rLDH (odds ratio = 2.12; 95% confidence interval = 1.39-3.15; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Neither age, BMI, nor gender had any statistical significant association with the risk of rLDH. Smoking was associated with higher risk of reoperation due to rLDH.

Thermoresponsive, redox-polymerized cellulosic hydrogels undergo in situ gelation and restore intervertebral disc biomechanics post discectomy

Back and neck pain are commonly associated with intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration. Structural augmentation of diseased nucleus pulposus (NP) tissue with biomaterials could restore degeneration-related IVD height loss and degraded biomechanical behaviors; however, effective NP replacement biomaterials are not commercially available. This study developed a novel, crosslinked, dual-polymer network (DPN) hydrogel comprised of methacrylated carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and methylcellulose (MC), and used in vitro, in situ and in vivo testing to assess its efficacy as an injectable, in situ gelling, biocompatible material that matches native NP properties and restores IVD biomechanical behaviors. Thermogelling MC was required to enable consistent and timely gelation of CMC in situ within whole IVDs. The CMC-MC hydrogel was tuned to match compressive and swelling NP tissue properties. When injected into whole IVDs after discectomy injury, CMC-MC restored IVD height and compressive biomechanical behaviors, including range of motion and neutral zone stiffness, to intact levels. Subcutaneous implantation of the hydrogels in rats further demonstrated good biocompatibility of CMC-MC with a relatively thin fibrous capsule, similar to comparable biomaterials. In conclusion, CMC-MC is an injectable, tunable and biocompatible hydrogel with strong potential to be used as an NP replacement biomaterial since it can gel in situ, match NP properties, and restore IVD height and biomechanical function. Future investigations will evaluate herniation risk under severe loading conditions and assess long-term in vivo performance.

Recurrence Is Associated With Body Mass Index in Patients Undergoing a Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery

Background

The aim of the study was to assess the body mass index (BMI) and other risk factors associated with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and clinical outcomes, in patients who undergo surgery for single-level LDH.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study, affecting patients that underwent surgery for single-level LDH attending our hospital between July 2009 and January 2016. The mean follow-up period was 3.5 years (1 - 8 years). To maintain adequately sized groups for analysis, level L2-L3 and L3-L4 herniations were grouped as upper disc levels (group A) and level L4-L5 (group B) and L5-S1 (group C) herniations were analyzed individually. Disk herniation was graded on T2-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance images by using a five-point scale. Pain assessment was made using the visual analog scale (VAS).

Results

Two hundred fifty-six (256) patients met study inclusion criteria. There were 138 males (53.9%) with a mean age of 55.3 ± 12.9 years (range, 30 - 77). The association between A, B and C groups was analyzed, based on criteria such as age, sex, BMI, surgical techniques, diabetes, size of herniated disc, preoperative VAS, length of hospital stay, drop foot on admission, smoking, family history and history of injury to the lumbar spine, location of herniated disc (far lateral) and use of steroids. We found a statistically significant factor between groups in BMI (P = 0.006), family history (P = 0.001), location (far lateral) (P = 0.003) and history of injury to the lumbar spine (P = 0.003).

Conclusions

There may be an association between severity of disc degeneration and BMI (overweight and obese adults). Furthermore, spine and neurosurgeons should be aware that BMI might be related to patients' outcome.

Acupuncture for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To evaluate evidence for the effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

Methods

Electronic databases were searched to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture for LDH. A meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 and the evidence level was assessed using GRADE methodology.

Results

Thirty RCTs involving 3503 participants were included in the study. Meta-analysis showed that acupuncture had a higher total effective rate than lumbar traction (RR=1.1, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.15; p<0.001), ibuprofen (RR=1.24, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.48; p=0.02), diclofenac sodium (RR=1.44, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.67; p<0.001) and meloxicam (RR=1.16, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.31; p=0.01). Acupuncture was also better than lumbar traction (SMD −1.33, 95% CI −1.82 to −0.84; p<0.001) and diclofenac sodium (SMD −1.36, 95% CI −2.59 to −0.13; p=0.03) in terms of visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and better than lumbar traction (SMD 0.96, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.45; p=0.0001) with respect to Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. In addition, the total effective rate in five individual trials was greater for acupuncture than for mannitol plus dexamethasone and mecobalamin, ibuprofen plus fugui gutong capsule, loxoprofen, mannitol plus dexamethasone and huoxue zhitong decoction, respectively. Additionally, two individual trials showed a superior effect of acupuncture in VAS scores comparedwith ibuprofen or mannitol plus dexamethasone, respectively.

Conclusions

Acupuncture showed a more favourable effect in the treatment of LDH than lumbar traction, ibuprofen, diclofenac sodium, meloxicam, mannitol plus dexamethasone and mecobalamin, fugui gutong capsule plus ibuprofen, mannitol plus dexamethasone, loxoprofen and huoxue zhitong decoction. However, further rigorously designed, large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

Selection of Tubular and Endoscopic Transforaminal Disc Procedures Based on Disc Size, Location, and Characteristics

The clinical effectiveness of percutaneous and transforaminal endoscopic discectomy procedures has been evaluated by the system used or compared to open laminectomy or micro-discectomy but are not evaluated based on the location and characteristics of the abnormal disc. This review proposes that outcomes are primarily related to disc size, biomechanics, location, and associated segmental fibrotic and bone changes as well as the surgeon's skill in using various systems rather than the specific system used. In these cases, the surgeon needs to decide if the goal of the procedure is simply internal decompression of an abnormal but contained herniated disc or release of the entrapped nerve root by a large contained disc, extruded and migrated disc fragment, or coexistent foraminal stenosis. Percutaneous and tubular transforaminal procedures are quite different, technically ranging from simple discectomy aspirating probes to larger endoscopic systems, providing the capability to remove large extruded free disc fragments, with or without foraminotomy. Recently, the ability to perform interbody fusion has been added to the range of procedures able to be performed endoscopically. At the same time, biologic solutions to disc degeneration are rapidly evolving and may have a place in combination with these procedures. This article reviews the interrelationship between clinical signs and symptoms, radiologic findings, and the biochemistry and biomechanics of the affected disc segment. Understanding the role played by all these factors enables the surgeon to evaluate both the disc and surrounding bone structures pre-operatively to determine if the clinical signs and symptoms are related to enlargement and displacement of a contained disc or compression or impingement of the nerve root. Based on this, the surgeon can choose different surgical systems, allowing simple decompression of a contained disc, possibly adding biologics, with a 'small' system, while a large herniated disc, or extruded fragment, causing root impingement, would require a ‘larger’ system that provides direct endoscopic visualization within the epidural space, foraminal decompression with drills, and direct surgical manipulation and freeing of the nerve root. By choosing the surgical system based on characteristics such as disc size, location, and associated inflammatory and fibrotic changes, the effectiveness of minimally invasive procedures will be more consistent and improve as the surgeon's diagnostic and operative skills improve.

Lumbar Disc Herniation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Substantial advancements have been made in the cause, diagnosis, imaging, and treatment options available for patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). We examined the current evidence and highlight the concepts on the frontline of discovery in LDH.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are a myriad of novel etiologies of LDH detailed in recent literature including inflammatory factors and infectious microbes. In the clinical setting, recent data focuses on improvements in computer tomography as a diagnostic tool and non-traditional injection options including tumor necrosis alpha inhibitors and platelet-rich plasma. Operative treatment outcomes have focused on minimally invasive endoscopic approaches and demonstrated robust 5-year post-operative outcomes. Advances in the molecular etiology of LDH will continue to drive novel treatment options. The role of endoscopic treatment for LDH will continue to evolve. Further research into10-year outcomes will be necessary as this surgical approach continues to gain widespread popularity.

Multidimensional long-term outcome analysis after single-level lumbar microdiscectomy: a retrospective single-centre study

OBJECTIVE

To present multidimensional long-term results after mono-segmental microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in a large adult cohort treated at a tertiary care centre.

METHODS

Retrospective study design with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire employed at follow-up. All patients undergoing surgical treatment for single-level LDH between 2003 and 2009 were identified. Electronic patient records and imaging data were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 939 patients underwent single-level lumbar MD at our institution. Three hundred and seven complete ODI forms (32.7%) were returned at a median follow-up of 48 months. Mean ODI score was 24.04, and mean age was 58 years. Females reported slightly higher ODI scores (25.52 vs. 22.68). Age and ODI score showed statistically significant correlation. Early surgery yielded lower ODI scores with patients faring significantly worse if symptoms persisted for a year or longer (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). ODI scores increased sharply even among those operated later than 1 week after symptom onset. Sequestered herniations were associated with significantly lower ODI scores than contained discs on MRI (21.96 vs. 39.89). Surgical complications occurred in 17 cases (5.6%), 82 patients (26.7%) required additional surgery, 58 (18.9%) of those for recurrent disc herniations.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest better outcomes with early surgical treatments. Time limits for conservative treatments should be set to avoid the chronification of pain and the worse overall outcomes that go along with belated surgery. Particularly in those with acute onset of pain, sequestered herniations and only mild degrees of immobilization good outcomes are common and surgical treatment appears best if indicated early.

Reoperation for Recurrent Intervertebral Disc Herniation in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial: Analysis of Rate, Risk Factors, and Outcome

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a post-hoc subgroup analysis of prospectively collected data in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for and to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing revision disc excision surgery in SPORT.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Risk factors for reherniation and outcomes after revision surgery have not been well-studied. This information is critical for proper patient counseling and decision-making.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary discectomy in the SPORT intervertebral disc herniation cohort were analyzed to determine risk factors for undergoing revision surgery. Risk factors for undergoing revision surgery for reherniation were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. Primary outcome measures consisted of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Sciatica Bothersomeness index (SBI), and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and yearly to 4 years.

RESULTS

Of 810 surgical patients, 74 (9.1%) received revision surgery for reherniation. Risk factors for reherniation included: younger age (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96 [0.94-0.99]), lack of a sensory deficit (HR 0.61 [0.37-0.99]) lack of motor deficit (HR 0.54 [0.32-0.91]), and higher baseline ODI score (HR 1.02 [1.01-1.03]). The time-adjusted mean improvement from baseline to 4 years was less for the reherniation group on all outcome measures (Bodily Pain Index [BP] 39.5 vs. 44.9, P = 0.001; Physical Function Index [PF] 37.1 vs. 44.5, P < 0.001; ODI 33.9 vs. 38.3, P < 0.001; SBI 8.7 vs. 10.5, P < 0.001). At 4 years, only SBI (-9 vs. -11.4, P = 0.002) was significantly lower in the reherniation group.

CONCLUSION

Younger patients with higher baseline disability without neurological deficit are at increased risk of undergoing revision surgery for reherniation. Those considering revision surgery for reherniation will likely improve significantly following surgery, but possibly not as much as with primary discectomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Surgical repair of annulus defect with biomimetic multilamellar nano/microfibrous scaffold in a porcine model

Annulus defect is associated with reherniation and disc degeneration after discectomy; currently there is no effective treatment that addresses this problem. The annulus is a hierarchical lamellar structure, where each lamella consists of aligned collagen fibres, which are parallel and tilted at 30° to the spinal axis. In this study, a biomimetic biodegradable scaffold consisting of multilamellar nano/microfibres, sharing nanotopography and microporosity similar to the native lamellar structure, was assessed in a porcine model, aided by sealing with fascia and medical glue and subsequent suture fixation. After 6- and 12-week observation, we found that this treatment restored nucleus volume and slowed down disc degeneration, as indicated by magnetic resonance imaging of T1/T2-weighted, T2-mapping, T1-ρ imaging. Histological analysis showed aligned collagen fibres organized in the scaffold and integrated with surrounding native annulus tissue. The autologous bone marrow concentrate-seeded scaffolds showed slightly earlier collagen fibre formation at 6 weeks. This novel treatment could efficiently close the annulus defect with newly formed, organized and integrated collagen fibres in a porcine model. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Ten Important Tips in Treating a Patient with Lumbar Disc Herniation

Lumbar disc herniation is a common spinal disorder that usually responds favorably to conservative treatment. In a small percentage of the patients, surgical decompression is necessary. Even though lumbar discectomy constitutes the most common and easiest spine surgery globally, adverse or even catastrophic events can occur. Appropriate patient selection and effective neural decompression constitute the most important points for better surgical outcomes and avoidance of unpleasant complications. Other important tips include timely performance of magnetic resonance imaging, correct interpretation of scan data, preoperative detection of underlying instability, exclusion of non-discogenic sciatica, determination of the main cause of clinical pathology, avoidance of the wrong side or level, and being sure that the more detailed procedure does not necessarily mean the more effective procedure.

Motor control exercise for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common condition in adults and can impose a heavy burden on both the individual and society. It is defined as displacement of disc components beyond the intervertebral disc space. Various conservative treatments have been recommended for the treatment of LDH and physical therapy plays a major role in the management of patients. Therapeutic exercise is effective for relieving pain and improving function in individuals with symptomatic LDH. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of motor control exercise (MCE) for symptomatic LDH.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will include all clinical trial studies with a concurrent control group which evaluated the effect of MCEs in patients with symptomatic LDH. We will search PubMed, SCOPUS, PEDro, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, CENTRAL and EMBASE with no restriction of language. Primary outcomes of this systematic review are pain intensity and functional disability and secondary outcomes are functional tests, muscle thickness, quality of life, return to work, muscle endurance and adverse events. Study selection and data extraction will be performed by two independent reviewers. The assessment of risk of bias will be implemented using the PEDro scale. Publication bias will be assessed by funnel plots, Begg's and Egger's tests. Heterogeneity will be evaluated using the I2 statistic and the χ2 test. In addition, subgroup analyses will be conducted for population and the secondary outcomes. All meta-analyses will be performed using Stata V.12 software.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethical concerns are predicted. The systematic review findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will also be presented at national/international academic and clinical conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42016038166.

Treatment of Recurrent Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review

Intervertebral disc herniation is one of the most common causes of back and extremity pain. The most commonly used surgical treatment is lumbar discectomy. About 0.5-25% go on to develop recurrent disc herniation (rDH) after a successful first discectomy. Currently, there aren't any guidelines to assist surgeons in determining which approach is most appropriate to treat rDH. A recent survey showed significant heterogeneity among surgeons regarding treatment options for rDH. It remains unclear which methods lead to better outcomes, as there are no comparative studies with a sufficient level of evidence. In this study, we aimed to perform a systematic review to compare treatment options for rDH and determine if one intervention provides better outcomes than the other; more specifically, whether outcome differences exist between discectomy alone and discectomy with fusion. We applied the PICOS (participants, intervention, comparison, outcome, study design) format to develop this systematic review through PubMed. Twenty-seven papers from 1978-2014 met our inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Nine papers reported outcomes after discectomy and seven of them showed good or excellent outcomes (70.60%-89%). Ten papers reported on minimally invasive discectomy. The percent change in visual analog scale (VAS) ranged from -50.77% to -86.57%, indicating an overall pain reduction. Four studies out of the ten reported good or excellent outcomes (81% to 90.2%). Three studies looked at posterolateral fusion. Three studies analyzed posterior lumbar interbody fusion. For one study, we found the VAS percentage change to be -46.02%. All reported good to excellent outcomes. Six studies evaluated the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. All reported improvement in pain. Four used VAS, and we found the percent change to be -54% to -86.5%. The other two used the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and we found the percent change to be 68.3% to 93.3%. We did not find enough evidence to support any significant difference in outcomes between discectomy alone and discectomy with fusion. The limitation of our study includes the lack of standardized outcomes reporting in the literature. However, reviewing the selected articles shows that fusion may have a greater improvement in pain compared to reoperation without fusion. Nonetheless, our study shows that further and more in-depth investigation is needed on the of treatment of rDH.

Comparison of lumbar discectomy alone and lumbar discectomy with direct repair of pars defect for patients with disc herniation and spondylolysis at the nearby lumbar segment

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

It is unknown whether direct repair (DR) of pars defect after lumbar discectomy (LD) for patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and spondylolysis leads to better outcomes than LD alone.

PURPOSE

The aim was to compare two surgical methods, LD alone and LD with DR, for LDH patients with spondylolysis at a nearby lumbar segment.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective comparative study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

This study enrolled 89 patients who were diagnosed with LDH and spondylolysis at the same or adjacent lumbar segment and were followed up for at least 1 year.

OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome was pain intensity of the lower back and lower extremities as measured with visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes included clinical outcomes as assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index and the 12-item short form health survey, radiologic outcomes as assessed with the gap distance and the union rate at the pars defect, surgical outcomes, and complications.

METHODS

Enrolled patients were classified into two groups: LD alone (Group A, 48 patients) and LD with DR (Group B, 41 patients).

RESULTS

Pain intensity of the lower back and lower extremities and clinical outcomes were significantly improved 1 year after surgery compared with preoperative scores. However, the scores in the group receiving LD alone steadily worsened during follow-up, whereas the scores in the group receiving LD with DR did not deteriorate over time. The difference in the gap distance of the pars defect between baseline and 1 year after surgery was significantly different between the groups. The fusion rate of the pars defect was 59% (24/41). With the exception of surgical time, which was longer in Group B, surgical outcomes and complications did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

At the 1-year follow-up, DR after LD was associated with better outcomes for LDH with spondylolysis than LD alone.

Predictors of pain and disability outcomes in one thousand, one hundred and eight patients who underwent lumbar discectomy surgery

BACKGROUND

A key component toward improving surgical outcomes is proper patient selection. Improved selection can occur through exploration of prognostic studies that identify variables which are associated with good or poorer outcomes with a specific intervention, such as lumbar discectomy. To date there are no guidelines identifying key prognostic variables that assist surgeons in proper patient selection for lumbar discectomy. The purpose of this study was to identify baseline characteristics that were related to poor or favourable outcomes for patients who undergo lumbar discectomy. In particular, we were interested in prognostic factors that were unique to those commonly reported in the musculoskeletal literature, regardless of intervention type.

METHODS

This retrospective study analysed data from 1,108 patients who underwent lumbar discectomy and had one year outcomes for pain and disability. All patient data was part of a multicentre, multi-national spine repository. Ten relatively commonly captured data variables were used as predictors for the study: (1) age, (2) body mass index, (3) gender, (4) previous back surgery history, (5) baseline disability, unique baseline scores for pain for both (6) low back and (7) leg pain, (8) baseline SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores, (9) baseline SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores, and (10) leg pain greater than back pain. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were run against one year outcome variables of pain and disability.

RESULTS

For the multivariate analyses associated with the outcome of pain, older patients, those with higher baseline back pain, those with lesser reported disability and higher SF-12 MCS quality of life scores were associated with improved outcomes. For the multivariate analyses associated with the outcome of disability, presence of leg pain greater than back pain and no previous surgery suggested a better outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

For this study, several predictive variables were either unique or conflicted with those advocated in general prognostic literature, suggesting they may have value for clinical decision making for lumbar discectomy surgery. In particular, leg pain greater than back pain and older age may yield promising value. Other significant findings such as quality of life scores and prior surgery may yield less value since these findings are similar to those that are considered to be prognostic regardless of intervention type.

Instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniation

BACKGROUND

The incidence of recurrence in patients undergoing primary discectomy due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH), is regularly reported as 5-15%. In this study we aimed to evaluate surgical outcome of instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the patients suffering from recurrent LDH.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 51 patients (30 female, 21 male) from August 2007 to October 2011. The mean age and follow-up of the patients was 46.4±14.8 (ranged; 29-77 years old) and 31.4±6.8 (ranged; 25-50 months), respectively. Clinical improvement was assessed by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), and subjective satisfaction rate, while fusion was appraised radiologically. Data analysis was by one sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov, paired t, and Mann-Whitney tests.

RESULTS

Surgery could significantly improve mean leg and lumbar VAS and ODI from preoperative 7.4±2.5, 7.8±3.1, and 72.1±21.5 to postoperative 3.4±3.6, 3.5±2.6, and 27.5±18.0, respectively at the last follow-up visit. Subjective satisfaction rate was excellent in 24 patients (47.1%), good in 14 (27.5%), fair 11 (21.6%), and poor in two (3.9%). We had one patient with iatrogenic partial L5 nerve root injury and one with unknown late onset refractory postoperative back pain. Fusion rate was 100% and instrument failure was nil.

CONCLUSION

In surgical treatment of the patients with recurrent LDH, bilaterally instrumented TLIF is a relatively safe and effective procedure and can be associated with least instrument failure and highest fusion rate while no postoperative bracing is also needed.