Etomidate, adrenal function, and mortality in critically ill patients

Retrospective Study on Mortality and Adrenal Insufficiency Following Emergency Intubation With Etomidate Versus Ketamine in Children

BACKGROUND

 Etomidate is a sedative-hypnotic used for intubation in children. Its use in airway management has been controversial since etomidate may induce adrenal insufficiency. Ketamine is frequently used for intubation in children and has not been reported to be associated with adrenal insufficiency. We evaluated the risk of death and adrenal suppression after rapid sequence intubation (RSI) with either etomidate or ketamine.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed using the TriNetX database in the United States from 61 healthcare organizations (HCOs). The final cohort after propensity matching included 1,191 patients who were ≤17 years of age and were given etomidate or ketamine for RSI but not both. The time frame was from December 22, 2003, to October 22, 2022.

RESULTS

After propensity matching, the etomidate and ketamine groups each contained 565 patients, and there was a significantly lower risk of adrenal suppression with etomidate (1.8%) compared to ketamine (4.2%) (RR=0.43, 95% CI=0.21-0.90, p=0.02). There were similar results regarding adrenal insufficiency when no propensity matching was performed. There were no differences in mortality when comparing intubation with etomidate or ketamine with and without propensity matching.

CONCLUSION

There was not an increased risk of adrenal insufficiency for etomidate administered as a single dose in children undergoing RSI in the emergency department (ED) when compared with ketamine. Additionally, there was no difference in mortality for those intubated with ketamine or etomidate.

Intubation of critically ill patients: A pilot study of minute-by-minute physiological changes within an Australian tertiary intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

There are no published minute-by-minute physiological assessment data for endotracheal intubation (ETT) performed in the intensive care unit (ICU). The majority of physiological data is available from Europe and North America where etomidate is the induction agent administered most commonly.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to describe the feasibility of obtaining minute-by-minute physiological and medication data surrounding ETT in an Australian tertiary ICU and to assess its associated outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a single-centre feasibility observational study. We obtained minute-by-minute data on physiological variables and medications for 15 min before and 30 min after ETT. We assessed feasibility as enrolled to screened patient ratio and completeness of data collection in enrolled patients. Severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 65 mmHg) and severe hypoxaemia (pulse oximetry saturation < 80%) were the secondary clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

We screened 43 patients and studied 30 patients. The median age was 58.5 (interquartile range: 49-70) years, and 18 (60%) were male. Near-complete (97%) physiological and medication data were obtained in all patients at all times. Overall, 15 (50%) ETTs occurred after hours (17:30-08:00) and 90% were by video laryngoscopy with a 90% first-pass success rate. Prophylactic vasopressors were used in 50% of ETTs. Fentanyl was used in all except one ETT at a median dose of 2.5 mcg/kg. Propofol (63%) or midazolam (50%) were used as adjuncts at low dose. Rocuronium was used in all but one patient. There were no episodes of severe hypotension and only one episode of short-lived severe hypoxaemia.

CONCLUSION

Minute-by-minute recording of ETT-associated physiological changes in the ICU was feasible but only fully available in two-thirds of the screened patients. ETT was based on fentanyl induction, low-dose adjunctive sedation, and frequent prophylactic vasopressor therapy and was associated with no severe hypotension and a single short-lived episode of severe hypoxaemia.

Propofol administration for induction is associated with peri-intubation instability in trauma critical care unit patients

INTRODUCTION

Peri-intubation hypotension is associated with increased hospital length of stay and morbidity. Propofol is associated with alterations in hemodynamics. We hypothesize that using propofol for induction leads to peri-intubation hypotension in trauma critical care patients.

METHODS

Patients that underwent unplanned intubation in the trauma intensive care unit (TICU) were prospectively enrolled. Peri-intubation vitals and medications were recorded to assess hypotension within 10 ​min of intubation. Patients were divided into propofol (PROP) or other medication (OTR) groups.

RESULTS

Data was complete for 69 patients; 31 PROP and 38 OTR. In OTR there was an 8.8-point (-21.1, 3.6) SBP decrease (p ​= ​0.159) and in PROP there was a 30.8-point (-45.6, -16.0) SBP decrease (p ​= ​0.0002) with significant increases in heart rate (HR) and shock index (SI) (HR p ​= ​0.001, SI p ​< ​0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In patients without hypotension prior to intubation, we observed a statistically significant drop in the patients' SBP with use of propofol. In trauma critical care unit patients, we recommend considering an induction medication for unplanned intubation other than propofol.

Propofol vs etomidate for induction prior to invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) have a high mortality. However, little is known regarding the impact of induction agents, used prior to IMV, on clinical outcomes in this population. We assessed for the association between induction agent and mortality in patients with AMI requiring IMV.

METHODS

We compared clinical outcomes between those receiving propofol compared to etomidate for induction among adults with AMI between October 2015 and December 2019 using the Vizient® Clinical Data Base, a multicenter, US national database. We used inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to assess for the association between induction agent and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 5,147 patients, 1,386 (26.9%) of received propofol and 3,761 (73.1%) received etomidate for IMV induction. The mean (SD) age was 66.1 (12.4) years, 33.0% were women, and 51.6% and 39.8% presented with STEMI and cardiogenic shock, respectively. Patients in the propofol group were more likely to require preintubation vasoactive medication and mechanical circulatory support (both, P < .05). Utilization of propofol was associated with lower mortality compared to etomidate (32.3% vs 36.1%, P = .01). After propensity weighting, propofol use remained associated with lower mortality (weighted mean difference -4.7%; 95% confidence interval: -7.6% to -1.8%, P = .002). Total cost, ventilator days, and length of stay were higher in the propofol group (all, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Induction with propofol, compared with etomidate, was associated with lower mortality for patients with AMI requiring IMV. Randomized trials are needed to determine the optimal induction agent for this critically ill patient population.

Etomidate versus Ketamine as Prehospital Induction Agent in Patients with Suspected Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

Severe traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among young people around the world. Prehospital care focuses on the prevention and treatment of secondary brain injury and commonly includes tracheal intubation after induction of general anesthesia. The choice of induction agent in this setting is controversial. This study therefore investigated the association between the chosen induction medication etomidate versus S(+)-ketamine and the 30-day mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury who received prehospital airway management in the Netherlands.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected observational data of the Brain Injury: Prehospital Registry of Outcomes, Treatments and Epidemiology of Cerebral Trauma (BRAIN-PROTECT) cohort study. Patients with suspected severe traumatic brain injury who were transported to a participating trauma center and who received etomidate or S(+)-ketamine for prehospital induction of anesthesia for advanced airway management were included. Statistical analyses were performed with multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 1,457 patients were eligible for analysis. No significant association between the administered induction medication and 30-day mortality was observed in unadjusted analyses (32.9% mortality for etomidate versus 33.8% mortality for S(+)-ketamine; P = 0.716; odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.32; P = 0.711), as well as after adjustment for potential confounders (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.73; P = 0.765; and risk difference 0.017; 95% CI, -0.051 to 0.084; P = 0.686). Likewise, in planned subgroup analyses for patients with confirmed traumatic brain injury and patients with isolated traumatic brain injury, no significant differences were found. Consistent results were found after multiple imputations of missing data.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis found no evidence for an association between the use of etomidate or S(+)-ketamine as an anesthetic agent for intubation in patients with traumatic brain injury and mortality after 30 days in the prehospital setting, suggesting that the choice of induction agent may not influence the patient mortality rate in this population.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

The need to monitor emerging issues in etomidate usage: the misuse or abuse potential

Since 2011, the misuse or abuse of etomidate has gradually increased when propofol was designated a controlled drug under the Narcotics Control Act in Korea. Accordingly, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety announced that etomidate would be under the 'Regulation on the designation of drugs that may cause concerns of misuse or abuse' rule in June 2020, which is less stringent than the Narcotics Control Act. Therefore, this review investigates potential misuse or abuse cases of etomidate to consider strengthening its management. A literature search was conducted to compare etomidate with other sedatives in their efficacy and side effects, as well as identify the adverse health outcomes, abuse cases, and analytical methods of etomidate. Etomidate has an equal or higher sedative efficacy and lower risk of adverse cardiopulmonary events than propofol. However, major adverse effects of etomidate include adrenocortical suppression and unproven associated deaths, as well as myoclonus requiring pre-treatment. Although the issue of abuse and misuse of etomidate is emerging in recent years, there are few academic reports on these issues and analytical methods in the forensic field. In order to effectively manage the misuse or abuse of etomidate, it is necessary to continuously monitor related cases with great interest and to be more intensively studied on its abuse potential.

The Effect of Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Rapid Sequence Intubation on Maximum Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The use of induction agents for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) has been associated with hypotension in critically ill patients. Choice of induction agent may be important and the most commonly used agents are etomidate and ketamine.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effects of a single dose of ketamine vs. etomidate for RSI on maximum Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and incidence of hypotension.

METHODS

This single-center, randomized, parallel-group trial compared the use of ketamine and etomidate for RSI in critically ill adult patients in the emergency department. The study was performed under Exception from Informed Consent. The primary outcome was the maximum SOFA score within 3 days of hospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 143 patients were enrolled in the trial, 70 in the ketamine group and 73 in the etomidate group. Maximum median SOFA score for the ketamine group was 6.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 5-9) vs. 7 (IQR 5-9) for etomidate with no significant difference (-0.2; 95% CI -1.4 to 1.1; p = 0.79). The incidence of post-intubation hypotension was 28% in the ketamine group vs. 26% in the etomidate group (difference 2%; 95% CI -13% to 17%). There were no significant differences in intensive care unit outcomes. Thirty-day mortality rate for the ketamine group was 11% (8 deaths) and for the etomidate group was 21% (15 deaths), which was not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in maximum SOFA score or post-intubation hypotension between critically ill adults receiving ketamine vs. etomidate for RSI.

Virtual screening and biological evaluation to identify pharmaceuticals potentially causing hypertension and hypokalemia by inhibiting steroid 11β-hydroxylase

Several drugs were found after their market approval to unexpectedly inhibit adrenal 11β-hydroxylase (CYP11B1)-dependent cortisol synthesis. Known side-effects of CYP11B1 inhibition include hypertension and hypokalemia, due to a feedback activation of adrenal steroidogenesis, leading to supraphysiological concentrations of 11-deoxycortisol and 11-deoxycorticosterone that can activate the mineralocorticoid receptor. This results in potassium excretion and sodium and water retention, ultimately causing hypertension. With the risk known but usually not addressed in preclinical evaluation, this study aimed to identify drugs and drug candidates inhibiting CYP11B1. Two conceptually different virtual screening methods were combined, a pharmacophore based and an induced fit docking approach. Cell-free and cell-based CYP11B1 activity measurements revealed several inhibitors with IC50 values in the nanomolar range. Inhibitors include retinoic acid metabolism blocking agents (RAMBAs), azole antifungals, α2-adrenoceptor ligands, and a farnesyltransferase inhibitor. The active compounds share a nitrogen atom embedded in an aromatic ring system. Structure activity analysis identified the free electron pair of the nitrogen atom as a prerequisite for the drug-enzyme interaction, with its pKa value as an indicator of inhibitory potency. Another important parameter is drug lipophilicity, exemplified by etomidate. Changing its ethyl ester moiety to a more hydrophilic carboxylic acid group dramatically decreased the inhibitory potential, most likely due to less efficient cellular uptake. The presented work successfully combined different in silico and in vitro methods to identify several previously unknown CYP11B1 inhibitors. This workflow facilitates the identification of compounds that inhibit CYP11B1 and therefore pose a risk for inducing hypertension and hypokalemia.

Effects of etomidate combined with dexmedetomidine on adrenocortical function in elderly patients: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Etomidate has been advocated to be used in anesthesia for the elderly and the critically ill patients due to its faint effect on cardiovascular system. But the dose-dependent suppression of etomidate on adrenal cortex function leads to the limitation of its clinical application. Clinical research showed that dexmedetomidine could reduce the dose requirements for intravenous or inhalation anesthetics and opioids, and the hemodynamics was more stable during the operation. The objective was to observe the effect of etomidate combined with dexmedetomidine on adrenocortical function in elderly patients. 180 elderly patients scheduled for elective ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy were randomly allocated to PR group anesthetized with propofol-remifentanil, ER group anesthetized with etomidate-remifentanil, and ERD group anesthetized with dexmedetomidine combined with etomidate-remifentanil. Patients in each group whose operation time was less than or equal to 1 h were incorporated into short time surgery group (PR₁ group, ER₁ group and ERD₁ group), and whose surgical procedure time was more than 1 h were incorporated into long time surgery group (PR₂ group, ER₂ group and ERD₂ group). The primary outcome was the serum cortisol and ACTH concentration. The secondary outcomes were the values of SBP, DBP, HR and SpO₂, the time of surgical procedure, the dosage of etomidate and remifentanil administered during surgery, the time to spontaneous respiration, recovery and extubation, and the duration of stay in the PACU. The Serum cortisol concentration was higher at t_1~2   in ERD₁ group compared to ER₁ group (P < 0.05). The Serum cortisol concentration at t_1~3   was higher in ERD₂ group than in ER₂ group (P < 0.05). The Serum ACTH concentration was lower at t_1~2  in ERD₁ group compared to ER₁ group (P < 0.05). The Serum ACTH concentration at t_1~3  was lower in ERD₂ group compared to ER₂ group (P < 0.05). The SBP at T₁ and T₃ were higher in ER₂ and ERD₂ group than in PR₂ group (P < 0.05). The DBP in ER₁ and ERD₁ group were higher at T₁ compared to PR₁ group (P < 0.05). The dosage of etomidate was significantly lower in ERD₁ group and ERD₂ group than in ER₁ group and ER₂ group (P < 0.05), respectively. The administration of dexmedetomidine combined with etomidate can attenuate the inhibition of etomidate on adrenocortical function in elderly patients and maintain intraoperative hemodynamic stability.

E161111 is an ultra-short-acting etomidate analogue with stable haemodynamics that elicits only slight adrenocortical suppression in rats

Purpose

We report on a novel ultra-short-acting etomidate analogue, E161111, which has the same primary metabolite as etomidate.

Methods

The metabolic rate of E161111 was determined in rat plasma and liver homogenate. Rats were infused for 30 or 60 min to maintain light sedation at Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) for -2 to 0 score. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was monitored during 30 min infusion. The serum corticosterone was determined during and 3 h after infusion as a measure of adrenocortical function.

Results

E161111 was not detected in rat plasma at 1 min (t_1/2 = 6.69 ± 0.07 s) and in rat liver homogenates at 5 min (t_1/2 = 10.20 ± 3.76 s); its main metabolic product was etomidate acid. The recovery time from loss of righting reflex (LORR) was 4.3 ± 1.5 min after 1-h infusion of E161111. During 30 min infusion, E161111 did not cause MAP changes. The stimulated serum corticosterone levels after 1-h infusion of E161111 were significantly higher than that after 1-h infusion of etomidate at all time points tested for the 3 h study.

Conclusions

E161111 was metabolised rapidly, the metabolites were same as etomidate, and the recovery time after 1-h infusion was short. It elicited haemodynamic stability and milder suppression of corticosterone than that elicited by etomidate.

Endotracheal intubation sedation in the intensive care unit

Endotracheal intubation is one of the most common, yet most dangerous procedure performed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Complications of ICU intubations include severe hypotension, hypoxemia, and cardiac arrest. Multiple observational studies have evaluated risk factors associated with these complications. Among the risk factors identified, the choice of sedative agents administered, a modifiable risk factor, has been reported to affect these complications (hypotension). Propofol, etomidate, and ketamine or in combination with benzodiazepines and opioids are commonly used sedative agents administered for endotracheal intubation. Propofol demonstrates rapid onset and offset, however, has drawbacks of profound vasodilation and associated cardiac depression. Etomidate is commonly used in the critically ill population. However, it is known to cause reversible inhibition of 11 β-hydroxylase which suppresses the adrenal production of cortisol for at least 24 h. This added organ impairment with the use of etomidate has been a potential contributing factor for the associated increased morbidity and mortality observed with its use. Ketamine is known to provide analgesia with sedation and has minimal respiratory and cardiovascular effects. However, its use can lead to tachycardia and hypertension which may be deleterious in a patient with heart disease or cause unpleasant hallucinations. Moreover, unlike propofol or etomidate, ketamine requires organ dependent elimination by the liver and kidney which may be problematic in the critically ill. Lately, a combination of ketamine and propofol, “Ketofol”, has been increasingly used as it provides a balancing effect on hemodynamics without any of the side effects known to be associated with the parent drugs. Furthermore, the doses of both drugs are reduced. In situations where a difficult airway is anticipated, awake intubation with the help of a fiberoptic scope or video laryngoscope is considered. Dexmedetomidine is a commonly used sedative agent for these procedures.

Infectious Complications after Etomidate vs. Propofol for Induction of General Anesthesia in Cardiac Surgery-Results of a Retrospective, before-after Study

Background: Etomidate is typically used as an induction agent in cardiac surgery because it has little impact on hemodynamics. It is a known suppressor of adrenocortical function and may increase the risk for post-operative infections, sepsis, and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether etomidate increases the risk of postoperative sepsis (primary outcome) and infections (secondary outcome) compared to propofol. Methods: This was a retrospective before–after trial (IRB EA1/143/20) performed at a tertiary medical center in Berlin, Germany, between 10/2012 and 01/2015. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery were investigated within two observation intervals, during which etomidate and propofol were the sole induction agents. Results: One-thousand, four-hundred, and sixty-two patients, and 622 matched pairs, after caliper propensity-score matching, were included in the final analysis. Sepsis rates did not differ in the matched cohort (etomidate: 11.5% vs. propofol: 8.2%, p = 0.052). Patients in the etomidate interval were more likely to develop hospital-acquired pneumonia (etomidate: 18.6% vs. propofol: 14.0%, p = 0.031). Conclusion: Our study showed that a single-dose of etomidate is not statistically associated with higher postoperative sepsis rates after cardiac surgery, but is associated with a higher incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia. However, there is a notable trend towards a higher sepsis rate.

Risk factors for and prediction of post-intubation hypotension in critically ill adults: A multicenter prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Hypotension following endotracheal intubation in the ICU is associated with poor outcomes. There is no formal prediction tool to help estimate the onset of this hemodynamic compromise. Our objective was to derive and validate a prediction model for immediate hypotension following endotracheal intubation.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective, cohort study enrolling 934 adults who underwent endotracheal intubation across 16 medical/surgical ICUs in the United States from July 2015-January 2017 was conducted to derive and validate a prediction model for immediate hypotension following endotracheal intubation. We defined hypotension as: 1) mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg; 2) systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg and/or decrease in systolic blood pressure of 40% from baseline; 3) or the initiation or increase in any vasopressor in the 30 minutes following endotracheal intubation.

RESULTS

Post-intubation hypotension developed in 344 (36.8%) patients. In the full cohort, 11 variables were independently associated with hypotension: increasing illness severity; increasing age; sepsis diagnosis; endotracheal intubation in the setting of cardiac arrest, mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg, and acute respiratory failure; diuretic use 24 hours preceding endotracheal intubation; decreasing systolic blood pressure from 130 mmHg; catecholamine and phenylephrine use immediately prior to endotracheal intubation; and use of etomidate during endotracheal intubation. A model excluding unstable patients' pre-intubation (those receiving catecholamine vasopressors and/or who were intubated in the setting of cardiac arrest) was also developed and included the above variables with the exception of sepsis and etomidate. In the full cohort, the 11 variable model had a C-statistic of 0.75 (95% CI 0.72, 0.78). In the stable cohort, the 7 variable model C-statistic was 0.71 (95% CI 0.67, 0.75). In both cohorts, a clinical risk score was developed stratifying patients' risk of hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel multivariable risk score predicted post-intubation hypotension with accuracy in both unstable and stable critically ill patients.

STUDY REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02508948 and Registered Report Identifier: RR2-10.2196/11101.

Endotracheal Intubation Among the Critically Ill: Protocol for a Multicenter, Observational, Prospective Study

Background

Endotracheal intubation can occur in up to 60% of critically ill patients. Despite the frequency with which endotracheal intubation occurs, the current practice is largely unknown. This is relevant, as advances in airway equipment (ie, video laryngoscopes) have become more prevalent, leading to possible improvement of care delivered during this process. In addition to new devices, a greater emphasis on airway plans and choices in sedation have evolved, although the influence on patient morbidity and mortality is largely unknown.

Objective

This study aims to derive and validate prediction models for immediate airway and hemodynamic complications of intensive care unit intubations.

Methods

A multicenter, observational, prospective study of adult critically ill patients admitted to both medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs) was conducted. Participating ICU sites were located throughout eight health and human services regions of the United States for which endotracheal intubation was needed. A steering committee composed of both anesthesia and pulmonary critical care physicians proposed a core set of data variables. These variables were incorporated into a data collection form to be used within the multiple, participating ICUs across the United States during the time of intubation. The data collection form consisted of two basic components, focusing on airway management and hemodynamic management. The form was generated using RedCap and distributed to the participating centers. Quality checks on the dataset were performed several times with each center, such that they arrived at less than 10% missing values for each data variable; the checks were subsequently entered into a database.

Results

The study is currently undergoing data analysis. Results are expected in November 2018 with publication to follow thereafter. The study protocol has not yet undergone peer review by a funding body.

Conclusions

The overall goal of this multicenter prospective study is to develop a scoring system for peri-intubation, hemodynamic, and airway-related complications so we can stratify those patients at greatest risk for decompensation as a result of these complications. This will allow critical care physicians to be better prepared in addressing these occurrences and will allow them to improve the quality of care delivered to the critically ill.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02508948; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02508948 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/73Oj6cTFu)

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

RR1-10.2196/11101

Etomidate: to use or not to use for endotracheal intubation in the critically ill?

Endotracheal intubation is frequently performed in the intensive care unit (ICU). It can be life-saving for many patients who present with acute respiratory distress. However, it is equally associated with complications that may lead to unwanted effects in this patient population. According to the literature, the rate of complications associated with endotracheal intubation is much higher in an environment such as the ICU as compared to other, more controlled environments (i.e., operating room). Thus, the conduct of performing such a procedure needs to be accomplished with the utmost care. To facilitate establishment of the breathing tube, sedation is routinely administered. Given the tenuous hemodynamic status of the critically ill, etomidate was frequently chosen to blunt further decreases in blood pressure and/or heart rate. Recently however, reports have demonstrated a possible association with the use of etomidate for endotracheal intubation and mortality in the critically ill. In addition, this association seems to be predominantly in patients diagnosed with sepsis. As a result, some have advocated against the use of this medication in septic patients. Due to the negative associations identified with etomidate and mortality, several investigators have evaluated potential alternatives to this solution (e.g., ketamine and ketamine-propofol admixture). These studies have shown promise. However, despite the evidence against using etomidate for endotracheal intubation, other studies have demonstrated no such association. This leaves the critical care clinician with uncertainty regarding the best sedative to administer in this patient population. The following editorial discusses current evidence regarding etomidate use for endotracheal intubation and mortality. In particular, we highlight a recent article with the largest population to date that found no association between etomidate and mortality in the critically ill and illustrate important findings that the reader should be aware of regarding this article.

Ketamine/propofol admixture (ketofol) at induction in the critically ill against etomidate (KEEP PACE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is commonly performed as a life-saving procedure in the intensive care unit (ICU). It is often associated with significant hemodynamic perturbations and can severely impact the outcome of ICU patients. Etomidate is often chosen by many critical care providers for the patients who are hypotensive because of its superior hemodynamic profile compared to other induction medications. However, recent evidence has raised concerns about the increased incidence of adrenal insufficiency and mortality associated with etomidate use. A combination of ketamine and propofol (known as ketofol) has been studied in various settings as an alternative induction agent. In recent years, studies have shown that this combination may provide adequate sedation while maintaining hemodynamic stability, based on the balancing of the hemodynamic effects of these two individual agents. We hypothesized that ketofol may offer a valuable alternative to etomidate in critically ill patients with or without hemodynamic instability.

METHODS/DESIGN

A randomized controlled parallel-group clinical trial of adult critically ill patients admitted to either a medical or surgical ICU at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN will be conducted. As part of planned emergency research, informed consent will be waived after appropriate community consultation and notification. Patients undergoing urgent or emergent ETI will receive either etomidate or a 1:1 admixture of ketamine and propofol (ketofol). The primary outcome will be hemodynamic instability during the first 15 minutes following drug administration. Secondary outcomes will include ICU length of stay, mortality, adrenal function, ventilator-free days and vasoactive medication use, among others. The planned sample size is 160 total patients.

DISCUSSION

The overall goal of this trial is to assess the hemodynamic consequences of a ketamine-propofol combination used in critically ill patients undergoing urgent or emergent ETI compared to etomidate, a medication with an established hemodynamic profile. The trial will address a crucial gap in the literature regarding the optimal induction agent for ETI in patients that may have potential or established hemodynamic instability. Greater experience with planned emergency research will, hopefully, pave the way for future prospective randomized clinical trials in the critically ill population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02105415. 31 March 2014.

Comparison of clinical outcome variables in patients with and without etomidate-facilitated anesthesia induction ahead of major cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis

Introduction

It is well known that etomidate may cause adrenal insufficiency. However, the clinical relevance of adrenal suppression after a single dose of etomidate remains vague. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the administration of a single dose of etomidate or an alternative induction regime ahead of major cardiac surgery and clinical outcome parameters associated with adrenal suppression and onset of sepsis.

Methods

The anesthesia and intensive care unit (ICU) records from patients undergoing cardiac surgery over five consecutive years (2008 to 2012) were retrospectively analyzed. The focus of the analysis was on clinical parameters like mortality, ventilation hours, renal failure, and sepsis-linked serum parameters. Multivariate analysis and Cox regression were applied to derive the results.

Results

In total, 3,054 patient records were analyzed. A group of 1,775 (58%) patients received a single dose of etomidate; 1,279 (42%) patients did not receive etomidate at any time. There was no difference in distribution of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical score, duration of surgery, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score. Postoperative data showed no significant differences between the two groups in regard to mortality (6.8% versus 6.4%), mean of mechanical ventilation hours (21.2 versus 19.7), days in the ICU (2.6 versus 2.5), hospital days (18.7 versus 17.4), sepsis-associated parameters, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, and incidence of renal failure. Administration of etomidate showed no significant influence (P = 0.6) on hospital mortality in the multivariate Cox analysis.

Conclusions

This study found no evidence for differences in key clinical outcome parameters based on anesthesia induction with or without administration of a single dose of etomidate. In consequence, etomidate might remain an acceptable option for single-dose anesthesia induction.

Etomidate use and postoperative outcomes among cardiac surgery patients

BACKGROUND

Although a single dose of etomidate can cause relative adrenal insufficiency, the impact of etomidate exposure on postoperative outcomes is unknown. The objective of this study was to examine the association between a single induction dose of etomidate and clinically important postoperative outcomes after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively examined the association between etomidate exposure during induction of anesthesia and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery from January 2007 to December 2009 by using multivariate logistic regression analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Postoperative outcomes of interest were severe hypotension, mechanical ventilation hours, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Sixty-two percent of 3,127 patients received etomidate. Etomidate recipients had a higher incidence of preoperative congestive heart failure (23.0 vs. 18.3%; P = 0.002) and a lower incidence of preoperative cardiogenic shock (1.3 vs. 4.0%; P < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for severe hypotension and in-hospital mortality associated with receiving etomidate was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.58-1.09) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.45-1.24), respectively, and the adjusted hazard ratio for time to mechanical ventilation removal and time to hospital discharge was 1.10 (95% CI, 1.00-1.21) and 1.07 (95% CI, 0.97-1.18), respectively. Propensity score analysis did not change the association between etomidate use and postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, there was no evidence to suggest that etomidate exposure was associated with severe hypotension, longer mechanical ventilation hours, longer length of hospital stay, or in-hospital mortality. Etomidate should remain an option for induction of anesthesia in cardiac surgery patients.