Acute Statin Treatment Improves Recovery after Experimental Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Rationale and Design of the Statin Use in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients (SATURN) Trial

INTRODUCTION

The benefits and risks of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) drugs in survivors of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are unclear. Observational studies suggest an association between statin use and increased risk of lobar ICH, particularly in patients with apolipoprotein-E (APOE) ε2 and ε4 genotypes. There are no randomized controlled trials addressing the effects of statins after ICH leading to uncertainty as to whether statins should be used in patients with lobar ICH who are at high risk for ICH recurrence. The SATURN trial aims to evaluate the effects of continuation versus discontinuation of statin on the risk of ICH recurrence and ischemic major adverse cerebro-cardio-vascular events (MACCEs) in patients with lobar ICH. Secondary aims include the assessment of whether the APOE genotype modifies the effects of statins on ICH recurrence, functional and cognitive outcomes, and quality of life.

METHODS

The SATURN trial is a multi-center, pragmatic, prospective, randomized, open-label, phase III clinical trial with blinded end-point assessment. A planned total of 1,456 patients with lobar ICH will be recruited from 140 sites in the USA, Canada, and Spain. Patients presenting within 7 days of a spontaneous lobar ICH that occurred while taking a statin will be randomized (1:1) to continuation (control) versus discontinuation (intervention) of the same statin drug and dose that they were using at ICH onset. The primary outcome is the time to recurrent symptomatic ICH within a 2-year follow-up period. The primary safety outcome is the occurrence of ischemic MACCE.

CONCLUSION

The results will help to determine the best strategy for statin use in survivors of lobar ICH and may help to identify if there is a subset of patients who would benefit from or be harmed by statins.

INTRODUCTION

The benefits and risks of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) drugs in survivors of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are unclear. Observational studies suggest an association between statin use and increased risk of lobar ICH, particularly in patients with apolipoprotein-E (APOE) ε2 and ε4 genotypes. There are no randomized controlled trials addressing the effects of statins after ICH leading to uncertainty as to whether statins should be used in patients with lobar ICH who are at high risk for ICH recurrence. The SATURN trial aims to evaluate the effects of continuation versus discontinuation of statin on the risk of ICH recurrence and ischemic major adverse cerebro-cardio-vascular events (MACCEs) in patients with lobar ICH. Secondary aims include the assessment of whether the APOE genotype modifies the effects of statins on ICH recurrence, functional and cognitive outcomes, and quality of life.

METHODS

The SATURN trial is a multi-center, pragmatic, prospective, randomized, open-label, phase III clinical trial with blinded end-point assessment. A planned total of 1,456 patients with lobar ICH will be recruited from 140 sites in the USA, Canada, and Spain. Patients presenting within 7 days of a spontaneous lobar ICH that occurred while taking a statin will be randomized (1:1) to continuation (control) versus discontinuation (intervention) of the same statin drug and dose that they were using at ICH onset. The primary outcome is the time to recurrent symptomatic ICH within a 2-year follow-up period. The primary safety outcome is the occurrence of ischemic MACCE.

CONCLUSION

The results will help to determine the best strategy for statin use in survivors of lobar ICH and may help to identify if there is a subset of patients who would benefit from or be harmed by statins.

Statins and 90-Day Functional Performance and Survival in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

The neuroprotective effect of statins has become a focus of interest in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). The purpose of this study was: (1) to evaluate the effect of statin use by the analyzed patients with sICH in the period preceding the onset of hemorrhage on their baseline neurological status and baseline neuroimaging of the head; (2) to evaluate the effect of statin use in the acute period of hemorrhage on the course and prognosis in the in-hospital period, taking into account whether the statin was taken before the hemorrhage or only after its onset; (3) to evaluate the effect of continuing statin treatment after in-hospital treatment on the functional performance and survival of patients up to 90 days after the onset of sICH symptoms, taking into account whether the statin was taken before the onset of sICH.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 153 patients diagnosed with sICH were analyzed, where group I were not previously taking a statin and group II were taking a statin before sICH onset. After lipidogram assessment, group I was divided into patients without dyslipidemia and without statin treatment (Ia) and patients with dyslipidemia who received de novo statin treatment during hospitalization (Ib). Group II patients continued taking statin therapy. We evaluated the effect of prior statin use on the severity of hemorrhage; the effect of statin use during the acute period of sICH on its in-hospital course; and the effect of statin treatment on the severity of neurological deficit, functional capacity and survival of patients up to 90 days after the onset of sICH symptoms.

RESULTS

There was no effect of prior statin use on the severity of hemorrhage as assessed clinically and by neuroimaging of the head. At in-hospital follow-up, subgroup Ia was the least favorable in terms of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. This subgroup had the highest percentage of deaths during hospitalization. In the post-hospital period, the greatest number of patients with improvement in the NIHSS, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Barthel scales were among those taking statins, especially group II patients. At 90-day follow-up, survival analysis fell significantly in favor of subgroup Ib and group II.

CONCLUSIONS

1. The use of statins in the pre-sICH period did not adversely affect the patients' baseline neurological status or the results of baseline neuroimaging studies. 2. Continued statin therapy prior to the onset of sICH or the inclusion of statins in acute treatment in patients with sICH and dyslipidemia does not worsen the course of the disease and the in-hospital prognosis. Statin therapy should not be discontinued during the acute phase of sICH. 3. To conclude the eventual beneficial effect on the functional performance and survival of patients after sICH onset, comparability of the analyzed groups in terms of clinical, radiological and other prognostic factors in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage would be needed. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Suppressive role of lovastatin in intracerebral hemorrhage through repression of autophagy

Statins possess critical function in the brain. Here, we intended to investigate the role of lovastatin in brain damage after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). A collagenase-induced ICH rat model was established followed by lovastatin treatment. Then, the effect of lovastatin on ICH-induced brain damage was explored with cognitive function, learning and memory abilities, and neurological damage of rats analyzed. Besides, brain water content, number of degenerate neurons, Nissl's body, and apoptosis of neurons were detected. Oxidative stress levels, inflammation, and autophagy levels in ICH were measured after treatment of lovastatin. Lovastatin improved the cognitive impairment of rats, enhanced their spatial learning and memory abilities, reduced nervous system damage, lesion area, and brain water content after ICH. Lovastatin was capable of reducing the number of degenerated neurons, the apoptosis level, autophagy level, and increasing the number of Nissl's body. Lovastatin inhibited the oxidative stress response and inflammatory factors in the brain tissue after ICH, and increased the expression of anti-inflammatory factor IL-10. Lovastatin inhibited AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway after ICH. Our study highlighted the suppressive role of lovastatin in ICH-induced brain damage.

MicroRNAs hsa-miR-618 and hsa-miR-297 Might Modulate the Pleiotropic Effects Exerted by Statins in Endothelial Cells Through the Inhibition of ROCK2 Kinase: in-silico Approach

Several studies show that statin therapy improves endothelial function by cholesterol-independent mechanisms called “pleiotropic effects.” These are due to the inhibition of the RhoA/ROCK kinase pathway, its inhibition being an attractive atheroprotective treatment. In addition, recent work has shown that microRNAs, posttranscriptional regulators of gene expression, can affect the response of statins and their efficacy. For this reason, the objective of this study was to identify by bioinformatic analysis possible new microRNAs that could modulate the pleiotropic effects exerted by statins through the inhibition of ROCK kinases. A bioinformatic study was performed in which the differential expression of miRNAs in endothelial cells was compared under two conditions: Control and treated with simvastatin at 10 μM for 24 h, using a microarray. Seven miRNAs were differentially expressed, three up and four down. Within the up group, the miRNAs hsa-miR-618 and hsa-miR-297 present as a predicted target to ROCK2 kinase. Also, functional and enriched pathway analysis showed an association with mechanisms associated with atheroprotective effects. This work shows an in-silico approach of how posttranscriptional regulation mediated by miRNAs could modulate the pleiotropic effects exerted by statins on endothelial cells, through the inhibition of ROCK2 kinase and its effects.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Statins in Animal Models of Intracerebral Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a severe form of stroke with limited treatment options. Statins have shown promise as a therapy for ICH in animal and human studies. We systematically reviewed and assessed the quality of preclinical studies exploring statin-use after ICH to guide clinical trial decision-making and design.

METHODS

We identified preclinical trials assessing the efficacy of statins in ICH via a systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. In total, 16 studies were identified that described statin use in an animal model of ICH and assessed histological outcomes, behavioral scores, or both. Design characteristics were analyzed using Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) criteria modified for ICH. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Behavioral outcomes were assessed in 12 of the studies with 100% (n = 12) reporting that statins significantly improved ICH recovery. Histologic hematoma volume and brain water content outcomes were analyzed in 10 of the studies, with 50% (n = 5) reporting significant improvement. The ratio of means between experimental and control cases for modified Neurological Severity Score was 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.49-0.82). The ratio of means between experimental and control cases for hemorrhagic volume was 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.70-1.03). There was heterogeneity between studies (P < 0.0001) but no evidence of publication bias (P = 0.89, P = 0.59, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Behavioral outcomes in ICH were found to consistently improve with administration of statins in preclinical studies suggesting that statin therapy may be suitable for randomized clinical trials in humans. In addition, the STAIR criteria can be modified to effectively evaluate preclinical studies in ICH.

Neuroprotective Therapies for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Patients who survive the initial ictus of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remain vulnerable to subsequent injury of the perilesional parenchyma by molecular and cellular responses to the hematoma. Secondary brain injury after ICH, which contributes to long-term functional impairment and mortality, has emerged as an attractive therapeutic target. This review summarizes preclinical and clinical evidence for neuroprotective therapies targeting secondary injury pathways following ICH. A focus on therapies with pleiotropic antiinflammatory effects that target thrombin-mediated chemotaxis and inflammatory cell migration has led to studies investigating statins, anticholinergics, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma agonists, and magnesium. Attempts to modulate ICH-induced blood-brain barrier breakdown and perihematomal edema formation has prompted studies of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents, matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors, and complement inhibitors. Iron chelators, such as deferoxamine and albumin, have been used to reduce the free radical injury that ensues from erythrocyte lysis. Stem cell transplantation has been assessed for its potential to enhance subacute neurogenesis and functional recovery. Despite promising preclinical results of numerous agents, their outcomes have not yet translated into positive clinical trials in patients with ICH. Further studies are necessary to improve our understanding of the molecular events that promote damage and inflammation of the perihematomal parenchyma after ICH. Elucidating the temporal and pathophysiologic features of this secondary brain injury could enhance the clinical efficacy of neuroprotective therapies for ICH.

Significant reduction in the LDL cholesterol increases the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 randomized controlled trials

The dose-dependent pleiotropic effects of statin therapy may have unwanted side effects such as increasing the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The relationships among statin therapy, LDL-cholesterol levels, and ICH risk remain controversial. Here, we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of dose-dependent statin therapy and ICH risk. Eligible articles were identified by searching MEDLINE from inception up to December 1, 2018. Reference lists of previous meta-analyses were manually searched to retrieve all relevant publications. Statin doses were allocated into one of two groups according to the observed reduction of LDL cholesterol: doses that lowered LDL-cholesterol levels ≥35% were regarded as high-dose statin therapy, whereas those that lowered LDL-cholesterol levels <35% were regarded as low-dose statin therapy. We retrieved 33 studies involving 203,305 subjects. The pooled analysis indicated that high-dose statin treatment significantly increased the risk of ICH [relative risk (RR), 1.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-1.68] and reduced the risk of all stroke (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.92), ischemic stroke (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.87), and all-cause mortality (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.98). The analyses did not detect any association between low-dose statin treatment and ICH (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.88-1.25). Low-dose statin therapy significantly reduced the incidence of all stroke (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.89), ischemic stroke (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76-0.86), and all-cause mortality (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.97). Our data indicate that low-dose statin therapy is a safe and effective ICH treatment, whereas high-dose statin therapy is associated with increased ICH risk. Hence, our meta-analysis suggests that the dose-dependent pleiotropic effects of statin therapy are related to the measured reduction in LDL cholesterol.

Statins for neuroprotection in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage

Statins, a common drug class for treatment of dyslipidemia, may be neuroprotective for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) by targeting secondary brain injury pathways in the surrounding brain parenchyma. Statin-mediated neuroprotection may stem from downregulation of mevalonate and its derivatives, targeting key cell signaling pathways that control proliferation, adhesion, migration, cytokine production, and reactive oxygen species generation. Preclinical studies have consistently demonstrated the neuroprotective and recovery enhancement effects of statins, including improved neurologic function, reduced cerebral edema, increased angiogenesis and neurogenesis, accelerated hematoma clearance, and decreased inflammatory cell infiltration. Retrospective clinical studies have reported reduced perihematomal edema, lower mortality rates, and improved functional outcomes in patients who were taking statins before ICH. Several clinical studies have also observed lower mortality rates and improved functional outcomes in patients who were continued or initiated on statins after ICH. Subgroup analysis of a previous randomized trial has raised concerns of a potentially elevated risk of recurrent ICH in patients with previous hemorrhagic stroke who are administered statins. However, most statin trials failed to show an association between statin use and increased hemorrhagic stroke risk. Variable statin dosing, statin use in the pre-ICH setting, and selection biases have limited rigorous investigation of the effects of statins on post-ICH outcomes. Future prospective trials are needed to investigate the association between statin use and outcomes in ICH.

Use of Statins and Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Statin use may be associated with improved outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage patients. However, the topic remains controversial. Our analysis examined the effect of prior, continued, or new statin use on intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes using the ERICH (Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage) data set.

METHODS

We analyzed ERICH (a multicenter study designed to examine ethnic variations in the risk, presentation, and outcomes of intracerebral hemorrhage) to explore the association of statin use and hematoma growth, mortality, and 3-month disability. We computed subset analyses with respect to 3 statin categories (prior, continued, or new use).

RESULTS

Two thousand four hundred and fifty-seven enrolled cases (mean age, 62 years; 42% females) had complete data on mortality and 3-month disability (modified Rankin Scale). Among those, 1093 cases were on statins (prior, n=268; continued, n=423; new, n=402). Overall, statin use was associated with reduced mortality and disability without any effect on hematoma growth. This association was primarily driven by continued/new statin use. A multivariate analysis adjusted for age and major predictors for poor outcome showed that continued/new statins users had good outcomes compared with prior users. However, statins may have been continued/started more frequently among less severe patients. When a propensity score was developed based on factors that could influence a physician's decision in prescribing statins and used as a covariate, continued/new statin use was no longer a significant predictor of good outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Although statin use, especially continued/new use, was associated with improved intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes, this effect may merely reflect the physician's view of a patient's prognosis rather than a predictor of survival.

Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Perihemorrhagic Edema and Secondary Hematoma Expansion: From Bench Work to Ongoing Controversies

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a medical emergency, which often leads to severe disability and death. ICH-related poor outcomes are due to primary injury causing structural damage and mass effect and secondary injury in the perihemorrhagic region over several days to weeks. Secondary injury after ICH can be due to hematoma expansion (HE) or a consequence of repair pathway along the continuum of neuroinflammation, neuronal death, and perihemorrhagic edema (PHE). This review article is focused on PHE and HE and will cover the animal studies, related human studies, and clinical trials relating to these mechanisms of secondary brain injury in ICH patients.

Statin use after intracerebral hemorrhage: a 10-year nationwide cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Although statin therapy is beneficial to patients with ischemic stroke, statin use, and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remain a concern. ICH survivors commonly have comorbid cardiovascular risk factors that would otherwise warrant cholesterol-lowering medication, thus emphasizing the importance of assessing the characteristics of statin therapy in this population.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study by using 10 years of data collected from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. We enrolled 726 patients admitted for newly diagnosed ICH from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2010. The patients were categorized into high- (92), moderate- (545), and low-intensity (89) statin groups, and into hydrophilic (295) and lipophilic (431) statin groups. The composite outcomes included all-cause mortality, recurrent ICH, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and acute coronary events.

RESULTS

The patients in the low-intensity group did not differ significantly from the patients in the high-intensity group in risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.28-1.55) and recurrent ICH (aHR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.30-1.44). In contrast, the patients in the hydrophilic group had a significantly lower risk of recurrent ICH than did those in the lipophilic group (aHR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.48-0.99). We determined no significant differences in other composite endpoints between hydrophilic and lipophilic statin use.

CONCLUSION

Hydrophilic statin therapy is associated with a reduced risk of recurrent ICH in post-ICH patients. The intensity of statin use had no significant effect on recurrent ICH or other components of the composite outcome. Additional studies are required to clarify the biological mechanisms underlying these observations.

Statins in Intracerebral Hemorrhage

While statins play an indisputable role in primary and secondary prevention of ischemic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, a concern exists regarding a possible association between low lipoprotein levels and statin use on the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). While these data may incline physicians to discontinue statins after ICH, an increasing amount of preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that statins might have a beneficial effect on outcome and recovery in this context that goes beyond lipid lowering effects. Different etiologies of ICH and the related risk of recurrence should also be taken into account when deciding about statin use/avoidance in patients with high risk of ICH. The problem is compounded by paucity of data from randomized controlled trials and well-designed prospective observational studies. This review will discuss the existing evidence on potential interactions between statins and risk of ICH as well as outcomes in order to provide practical recommendations for clinical decision-making.

Blood lipid levels, statin therapy and the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage

Dyslipidemia has been proven to play an important role in the occurrence and development of the ischemic stroke and lipid-lowering therapy could significantly decrease the risk of the ischemic stroke. However, the association between lipid levels, lipid-lowering therapy and the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is not clear. Studies have shown that low serum levels of total cholesterol might be associated with increasing risk of ICH, whereas the SPARCL study, a large prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, demonstrated an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke during high-dose statin therapy among the patients with previous stroke. The relationship between lipid-lowering therapy and ICH has become a hot topic in the recent years. We searched PubMed for articles published in English to review the existing evidence on the association of lipid levels, statin therapy and risk of ICH as well as the underlying mechanisms in order to provide practical recommendations for clinical decision-making and a foundation for further researches.