Implications of receptor for advanced glycation end products for progression from obesity to diabetes and from diabetes to cancer

Impact of preoperative type 2 diabetes mellitus on the outcomes of patients with gastric cancer following gastrectomy: Analysis of 834 patients using propensity score matching

The purpose of the current study was to compare the outcomes of patients with gastric cancer (GC) between the type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) group and the non-T2DM group. The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to March 8, 2022, to identify propensity score matching (PSM) studies that analyzed the effect of T2DM on the outcomes of patients with GC. Total complications, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared between the T2DM group and the non-T2DM group. A total of four PSM studies with 834 patients were included in the current study. There were 311 and 523 patients in the T2DM group and the non-T2DM group, respectively. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were adjusted with PSM in all the four studies, however, no significant difference was found in baseline characteristics (P>0.05). DFS was significantly worse in the T2DM group compared with that in the non-T2DM group [hazard ratio (HR), 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10-1.90; P=0.007)]. However, after pooling up the data, there was no significant difference between the T2DM group and the non-T2DM group in terms of OS (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.92-2.16; P=0.11), CSS (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.92-1.81; P=0.14) and total complications (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.64-1.60; P=0.95). Patients with GC and T2DM are associated with poor DFS. However, there were no significant differences between the T2DM group and the non-T2DM group in terms of OS, CSS and total complications.

Circulating Proteins as Diagnostic Markers in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is a highly malignant disease affecting humans worldwide and has a poor prognosis. Most GC cases are detected at advanced stages due to the cancer lacking early detectable symptoms. Therefore, there is great interest in improving early diagnosis by implementing targeted prevention strategies. Markers are necessary for early detection and to guide clinicians to the best personalized treatment. The current semi-invasive endoscopic methods to detect GC are invasive, costly, and time-consuming. Recent advances in proteomics technologies have enabled the screening of many samples and the detection of novel biomarkers and disease-related signature signaling networks. These biomarkers include circulating proteins from different fluids (e.g., plasma, serum, urine, and saliva) and extracellular vesicles. We review relevant published studies on circulating protein biomarkers in GC and detail their application as potential biomarkers for GC diagnosis. Identifying highly sensitive and highly specific diagnostic markers for GC may improve patient survival rates and contribute to advancing precision/personalized medicine.

AGEs and RAGE: metabolic and molecular signatures of the glycation-inflammation axis in malignant or metastatic cancers

From attributing mutations to cancers with the advent of cutting-edge genetic technology in recent decades, to re-searching the age-old theory of intrinsic metabolic shift of cancers (Warburg's glycolysis), the quest for a precise panacea for mainly the metastatic cancers, remains incessant. This review delineates the advanced glycation end product (AGE)-receptor for AGE (RAGE) pathway driven intricate oncogenic cues, budding from the metabolic (glycolytic) reliance of tumour cells, branching into metastatic emergence of malignancies. Strong AGE-RAGE concomitance in metastasis, chemo-resistance and cancer resurgence adversely incite disease progression and patient mortality. At the conjunction of metabolic and metastatic shift of cancers, are the "glycolytically" generated AGEs and AGE-activated RAGE, instigating aberrant molecular pathways, culminating in aggressive malignancies. AGEs as by-products of metabolic insurgence, modify the metabolome, epigenome and microbiome, besides coercing the inter-, intra- and extra-cellular micro-milieu conducive for oncogenic events like epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). AGE-RAGE synergistically elicit ATP surge for surplus energy, autophagy for apoptotic evasion and chemo-resistance, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) for meta-inflammation and angiogenesis, high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) for immune tolerance, S100 proteins for metastasis, and p53 protein attenuation for tumour suppression. AGEs are pronouncedly reported in invasive forms of breast, prostate, colon and pancreatic cancers, higher in patients with cancer than healthy counterparts, and higher in advanced stage than localized phase. Hence, the investigation of person-specific presence of AGEs, soluble RAGE and AGE-activated RAGE can be advocated as impending bio-markers for diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic purposes, to predict cancer risk in patients with diabetes, obesity, metabolic syndrome as well as general population, to monitor prognosis and metastasis in patients with cancer, and to reckon complications in cancer survivors. Furthermore, clinical reports of exogenous (dietary) and endogenous (internally formed) AGEs in cancer patients, and contemporary clinical trials involving AGE-RAGE axis in cancer are underlined with theranostic implications.