Contemporary review of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy

Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasm: a propensity matched analysis of peri-operative and oncologic outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Though open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) is the gold standard, robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) is on the rise due to its technical ease with robotic armamentarium and claim to decrease morbidity in the perioperative period. This study compares the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of RPD performed for periampullary neoplasms (PANs) with OPD.

METHOD

This is a retrospective study conducted from January 2018 to December 2023 for all the patients who underwent either OPD or RPD for PANs. Demographic, peri-operative outcomes and oncological parameters [disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)] were analysed and compared. The two groups were matched using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce the risk of confounding.

RESULTS

A hundred patients were analysed (30 in RPD and 70 in OPD), and both groups were similar in demographic characteristics. Post-operative morbidity in terms of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula, post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying and overall Clavien-Dindo ≥ Grade 3 complications were similar in both groups. Surgical site infection (SSI) was significantly higher in the OPD group compared to RPD (31.4% vs. 6.7, p = 0.008); however, the median postoperative hospital stay was similar in both groups. After PSM (26 patients in each group), the RPD group had significantly more operative time (480 min vs. 360 min, p = 0.007) less blood loss (250 ml vs. 400 ml, p = 0.004), and similar SSI [2(7.7%) vs. 6(23.1%), p = 0.178). The R0 resection rate, lymph nodal yield, lymph nodal positivity, DFS and OS were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The robotic approach for PD is technically safe and feasible with equivalent resection quality and oncological outcomes compared to the open approach. RPD has equivalent postoperative morbidity, DFS and OS.

Predictive value of the nutritional risk index for postoperative complications in individuals with pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy

PURPOSE

To explore the predictive value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) for postoperative complications and their severity in older adults with pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 109 older adults with pancreatic cancer undergoing PD at the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Quzhou Medical University, between May 2019 and May 2022. Statistical analysis of clinical data was performed to assess the predictive value of the GNRI for postoperative complications and their severity in older adults with pancreatic cancer undergoing PD.

RESULTS

Among the 109 individuals in this study, a total of 41 older adults undergoing PD experienced postoperative complications. The outcomes of the regression analysis showed that preoperative GNRI (OR = 0.184, 95 % CI = 0.023-0.457, P < 0.001), albumin levels (OR = 0.897, 95 % CI = 0.812-0.912, P < 0.001) and haemoglobin levels (OR = 1.231, 95 % CI = 1.043-1.451, P = 0.034) significantly influence the incidence of postoperative complications in older adults with pancreatic cancer. The prognostic value of the GNRI in predicting overall postoperative complications boasts a sensitivity of 83.2 %, specificity of 71.2 %, positive predictive value of 81.1 %, negative predictive value of 65.9 %, accuracy rate of 73.1 %, area under the curve (AUC) of 0.756 (P < 0.001) and a discriminative threshold of 97.0. Furthermore, the predictive efficacy of the GNRI in gauging the severity of postoperative complications demonstrates a sensitivity of 85.32 % and specificity of 79.54 %.

CONCLUSION

The GNRI can offer a faster, simpler and more effective method for evaluating nutritional risk in individuals with pancreatic tumours. Moreover, for older adults undergoing PD, it can serve as a convenient and efficient nutritional predictive indicator for postoperative complications and their severity.

Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy may offer improved oncologic outcomes over open surgery: a propensity-matched single-institution study

BACKGROUND

The robotic platform in pancreatic disease has gained popularity in the hepatobiliary community due to significant advantages it technically offers over conventional open and laparoscopic techniques. Despite promising initial studies, there remains scant literature on operative and oncologic outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective review evaluated all RPD performed for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2008 to 2019 in a single tertiary institution. RPD cases were matched to open cases (OPD) by demographic and oncologic characteristics and outcomes compared using Mann-Whitney U test, log rank tests, and Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight RPD cases were matched to 38 OPD. RPD had significantly higher lymph node (LN) yield (21.5 vs 13.5; p = 0.0036) and no difference in operative time or estimated blood loss (EBL). RPD had significantly lower rate of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (3% vs 32%; p = 0.0009) but no difference in leaks, infections, hemorrhage, urinary retention ,or ileus. RPD had significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) (7.5 vs. 9; p = 0.0209). There were no differences in 30- or 90-day readmissions or 90-day mortality. There was an equivalent R0 resection rate and LN positivity ratio. There was a trend towards improved median overall survival in RPD (30.4 vs. 23.0 months; p = 0.1105) and longer time to recurrence (402 vs. 284 days; p = 0.7471). OPD had two times the local recurrent rate (16% vs. 8%) but no difference in distant recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

While the feasibility and safety of RPD has been demonstrated, the impact on oncologic outcomes had yet to be investigated. We demonstrate that RPD not only offers similar if not superior immediate post-operative benefit by decreasing DGE but more importantly may offer improved oncologic outcomes. The significantly higher LN yield and decreased inflammatory response demonstrated in robotic surgery may improve overall survival.

Minimal-invasive approach to pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with lower early postoperative morbidity

OBJECTIVES

We aim to investigate the impact of the operation time for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in different surgical approaches.

METHODS

The NSQIP database was used to examine the clinical data of patients underwent PD during 2014-2016.

RESULTS

We sampled a total of 6151 patients who underwent elective PD. Of these, 452(7.3%) had minimally invasive approaches to PD. Minimally invasive approaches (MIS) to PD was associated with a significant decrease in morbidity of patients (AOR: 0.67, P < 0.01). Following risk adjustment for morbidity predictors, operation length was statistically associated with post-operative morbidity (AOR: 1.002, P < 0.01). Although MIS procedures were significantly longer operations compared to open procedures (443 min vs. 371 min, CI: 53-82 min, P < 0.01), MIS approaches were associated with significantly decreased morbidity in low stage tumors (stage zero-II) (51.3% vs. 56.2%, AOR: 0.72, P = 0.03) and advanced stage disease (stage III-IV) (50% vs. 60.3%, AOR: 0.38, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive approaches to PD were associated with decreased post-operative morbidity, even though they were associated with longer operative times. Operation length also significantly correlated with postoperative morbidity.

Role of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery: lessons learned from our initial experience

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery has achieved worldwide acceptance in various fields, however, pancreatic surgery remains one of the most challenging abdominal procedures. In fact, the indication for robotic surgery in pancreatic disease has been controversial. The present study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of robotic pancreatic resection.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our experience of robotic pancreatic resection done in Sanchinarro University Hospital. Clinicopathologic characteristics, and perioperative and postoperative outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

From October 2010 to April 2016, 50 patients underwent robotic-assisted surgery for different pancreatic pathologies. All procedures were performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Of the 50 patients, 26 were male and 24 female. The average age of all patients was 62 years. Operative time was 370 minutes. Among the procedures performed were 16 pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD), 23 distal pan-createctomies (DP), 11 tumor enucleations (TE). The mean hospital stay was 17.6 days in PD group, 9.0 days in DP group and 8.4 days in TE group. Pancreatic fistula occurred in 10 cases (20%), 2 after PD, 3 after DP, and 5 after TE. Four patients had postoperative transfusion in PD group and one in DP group. Conversion to open laparotomy occurred in four patients (8%). No serious intraoperative complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

From our early experience, robotic pancreatic surgery is a safe and feasible procedure. Further experience and follow-up are required to confirm the role of robotic approach in pancreatic surgery.

Telemedicine broadening access to care for complex cases

BACKGROUND

Surgical and nonsurgical specialists are highly centralized, making access to high-quality care difficult for many Americans. We explored the feasibility, benefits, preliminary outcomes, and patient satisfaction with a new type of health visit, in which a surgical oncologist used video telecommunication to manage and treat complex cancer diseases, including patients with severe comorbidities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients visited local VA medical centers throughout Florida to engage in video telecommunication visits with a centralized surgical oncologist in Miami, who directed their oncology treatment. The average length of stay and rate of unplanned readmission were calculated within each organ. The total mileage saved was calculated by subtracting the distance between the patient's home address and the local VA from the distance between the patient's home address and the Miami VA. Travel costs were determined by the VA's reimbursement of $0.415/mile for health-related travel and reimbursement of $150.00 for an overnight hotel stay. A Likert scale with both positively and negatively keyed questions was used to assess patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

In 24 mo, seven unplanned readmissions occurred among 195 operations. Patients experienced an 80.7% reduction in travel distance and saved a total of 213,007.58 miles by visiting their local VA instead of the Miami VA. Survey results indicate that 86% of patients believed that the telemedicine program made medical care more accessible.

CONCLUSIONS

The Specialist-Directed Telemedicine Model can save patients substantial time and money by not traveling to centralized areas, while delivering greater continuity of care and patient satisfaction.

Technical considerations for the fully robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Minimally invasive surgery, including robotic surgery, has become the standard of care for many abdominal procedures. However, the technical complexity associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) due to the anatomic location and oncologic characteristics of pancreatic tumors has hindered the widespread application of minimally invasive techniques to this procedure. Recent studies have reported that for experienced surgeons, the application of robotic techniques to PD is associated with equivalent oncologic outcomes and rates of complication when compared to an open operation, and may be associated with accelerated surgical recovery. Despite these encouraging results, robotic PD (RPD) is a procedure attempted by a small group of pancreatic surgeons, leading to the great heterogeneity in the techniques used to perform this operation. Herein we describe our technique for fully RPD and demonstrate its execution with a video supplement.