1
|
Fezzi S, Ding D, Mahfoud F, Huang J, Lansky AJ, Tu S, Wijns W. Illusion of revascularization: does anyone achieve optimal revascularization during percutaneous coronary intervention? Nat Rev Cardiol 2024:10.1038/s41569-024-01014-0. [PMID: 38710772 DOI: 10.1038/s41569-024-01014-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
This Perspective article is a form of 'pastiche', inspired by the 1993 review by Lincoff and Topol entitled 'Illusion of reperfusion', and explores how their concept continues to apply to percutaneous revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease and ischaemia. Just as Lincoff and Topol argued that reperfusion of acute myocardial infarction was facing unresolved obstacles that hampered clinical success in 1993, we propose that challenging issues are similarly jeopardizing the potential benefits of stent-based angioplasty today. By analysing the appropriateness and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), we emphasize the limitations of relying solely on visual angiographic guidance, which frequently leads to inappropriate stenting and overtreatment in up to one-third of patients and the associated increased risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction. The lack of optimal revascularization observed in half of patients undergoing PCI confers risks such as suboptimal physiology after PCI, residual angina and long-term stent-related events, leaving an estimated 76% of patients with an 'illusion of revascularization'. These outcomes highlight the need to refine our diagnostic tools by integrating physiological assessments with targeted intracoronary imaging and emerging strategies, such as co-registration systems and angiography-based computational methods enhanced by artificial intelligence, to achieve optimal revascularization outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Fezzi
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, the Smart Sensors Laboratory and Curam, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Daixin Ding
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, the Smart Sensors Laboratory and Curam, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Felix Mahfoud
- Saarland University Hospital, Internal Medicine III, Cardiology, Angiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Homburg/Saar, Germany
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- University Heart Center Basel, Department of Cardiology, University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jiayue Huang
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, the Smart Sensors Laboratory and Curam, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Alexandra J Lansky
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Shengxian Tu
- Department of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, and School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
| | - William Wijns
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, the Smart Sensors Laboratory and Curam, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pighi M, Tomai F, Fezzi S, Pesarini G, Petrolini A, Spedicato L, Tarantini G, Ferlini M, Calabrò P, Loi B, Ferrero V, Forero MNT, Daemen J, Ribichini F. Safety and efficacy of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold for cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CART). Clin Res Cardiol 2024:10.1007/s00392-023-02351-9. [PMID: 38170246 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-023-02351-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is still the main drawback of heart transplantation (HTx) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a palliative measure because of the high incidence of failure. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) as potential novel therapeutic tool for the treatment of coronary stenoses in CAV. METHODS This is a multicenter, single-arm, prospective, open-label study (CART, NCT02377648), that included patients affected by advanced CAV treated with PCI and second-generation ABSORB BRS (Abbott Vascular). The primary endpoint was the incidence of 12-month angiographic in-segment scaffold restenosis (ISSR). Secondary endpoints were the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 12- and 36-month follow-up and the incidence of ISSR at 36 months. A paired intracoronary imaging analysis at baseline and follow-up was also performed. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2017 35 HTx patients were enrolled and treated for 44 coronary lesions with 51 BRSs. The primary endpoint occurred in 13.5% of the lesions (5/37), with a cumulative ISSR rate up to 3 years of 16.2% (6/37). Angiographic lumen loss was 0.40 ± 0.62 mm at 12 months and 0.53 ± 0.57 mm at 36 months. Overall survival rate was 91.4% and 74.3%, and MACEs incidence 14.2% and 31.4% at 12 and 36 months, respectively. At the paired intracoronary imaging analysis, a significant increase of the vessel external elastic membrane area in the treated segment and some progression of CAV proximally to the BRS were detected. CONCLUSIONS BRS-based PCI for the treatment of CAV is feasible and safe, with an ISSR incidence similar to what reported in retrospective studies with drug-eluting stents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Pighi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani, 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Tomai
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, European Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Fezzi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani, 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Gabriele Pesarini
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani, 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | | | - Leonardo Spedicato
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tarantini
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Ferlini
- Division of Cardiology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Paolo Calabrò
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
- Division of Clinical Cardiology, Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano Hospital, Caserta, Italy
| | - Bruno Loi
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Valeria Ferrero
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani, 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Joost Daemen
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flavio Ribichini
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani, 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Koo BK, Lee JM, Hwang D, Park S, Shiono Y, Yonetsu T, Lee SH, Kawase Y, Ahn JM, Matsuo H, Shin ES, Hu X, Ding D, Fezzi S, Tu S, Low AF, Kubo T, Nam CW, Yong AS, Harding SA, Xu B, Hur SH, Choo GH, Tan HC, Mullasari A, Hsieh IC, Kakuta T, Akasaka T, Wang J, Tahk SJ, Fearon WF, Escaned J, Park SJ. Practical Application of Coronary Physiologic Assessment: Asia-Pacific Expert Consensus Document: Part 1. JACC. ASIA 2023; 3:689-706. [PMID: 38095005 PMCID: PMC10715899 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
Coronary physiologic assessment is performed to measure coronary pressure, flow, and resistance or their surrogates to enable the selection of appropriate management strategy and its optimization for patients with coronary artery disease. The value of physiologic assessment is supported by a large body of evidence that has led to major recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. This expert consensus document aims to convey practical and balanced recommendations and future perspectives for coronary physiologic assessment for physicians and patients in the Asia-Pacific region based on updated information in the field that including both wire- and image-based physiologic assessment. This is Part 1 of the whole consensus document, which describes the general concept of coronary physiology, as well as practical information on the clinical application of physiologic indices and novel image-based physiologic assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bon-Kwon Koo
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Myung Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Doyeon Hwang
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sungjoon Park
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yasutsugu Shiono
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Taishi Yonetsu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Seung Hun Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Yoshiaki Kawase
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Jung-Min Ahn
- Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hitoshi Matsuo
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Eun-Seok Shin
- Department of Cardiology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Xinyang Hu
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Daixin Ding
- Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, The Smart Sensors Lab and Curam, National University of Ireland, University Road, Galway, Ireland
| | - Simone Fezzi
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, The Smart Sensors Lab and Curam, National University of Ireland, University Road, Galway, Ireland
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Shengxian Tu
- Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Adrian F. Low
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; National University Heart Centre, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Takashi Kubo
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Medical University, Hachioji Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chang-Wook Nam
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Research Institute, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Andy S.C. Yong
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Scott A. Harding
- Department of Cardiology, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Bo Xu
- Department of Cardiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Seung-Ho Hur
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Research Institute, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Gim Hooi Choo
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiac Vascular Sentral KL (CVSKL), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Huay Cheem Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; National University Heart Centre, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Ajit Mullasari
- Department of Cardiology, Madras Medical Mission, Chennai, India
| | - I-Chang Hsieh
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Tsunekazu Kakuta
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Takashi Akasaka
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Jian'an Wang
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Seung-Jea Tahk
- Department of Cardiology, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Korea
| | - William F. Fearon
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Javier Escaned
- Hospital Clinico San Carlos IDISSC, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Seung-Jung Park
- Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fezzi S, Ding D, Scarsini R, Huang J, Del Sole PA, Zhao Q, Pesarini G, Simpkin A, Wijns W, Ribichini F, Tu S. Integrated Assessment of Computational Coronary Physiology From a Single Angiographic View in Patients Undergoing TAVI. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16:e013185. [PMID: 37712285 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.123.013185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Angiography-derived computational physiology is an appealing alternative to pressure-wire coronary physiology assessment. However, little is known about its reliability in the setting of severe aortic stenosis. This study sought to provide an integrated assessment of epicardial and microvascular coronary circulation by means of single-view angiography-derived physiology in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS Pre-TAVI angiographic projections of 198 stenotic coronary arteries (123 patients) were analyzed by means of Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio and angiography microvascular resistance. Wire-based reference measurements were available for comparison: fractional flow reserve (FFR) in all cases, instantaneous wave-free ratio in 148, and index of microvascular resistance in 42 arteries. RESULTS No difference in terms of the number of ischemia-causing stenoses was detected between FFR ≤0.80 and Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio ≤0.80 (19.7% versus 19.2%; P=0.899), while this was significantly higher when instantaneous wave-free ratio ≤0.89 (44.6%; P=0.001) was used. The accuracy of Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio ≤0.80 in predicting pre-TAVI FFR ≤0.80 was significantly higher than the accuracy of instantaneous wave-free ratio ≤0.89 (93.4% versus 77.0%; P=0.001), driven by a higher positive predictive value (86.9% versus 50%). Similar findings were observed when considering post-TAVI FFR ≤0.80 as reference. In 82 cases with post-TAVI angiographic projections, Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio values remained stable, with a low rate of reclassification of stenosis significance (9.9%), similar to FFR and instantaneous wave-free ratio. Angiography microvascular resistance demonstrated a significant correlation (Rho=0.458; P=0.002) with index of microvascular resistance, showing an area under the curve of 0.887 (95% CI, 0.752-0.964) in predicting index of microvascular resistance ≥25. CONCLUSIONS Angiography-derived physiology provides a valid, reliable, and systematic assessment of the coronary circulation in a complex scenario, such as severe aortic stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Fezzi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Verona, Italy (S.F., R.S., P.A.D.S., G.P., F.R.)
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, The Smart Sensors Lab and Curam, University of Galway, Ireland (S.F., D.D., J.H., W.W.)
| | - Daixin Ding
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, The Smart Sensors Lab and Curam, University of Galway, Ireland (S.F., D.D., J.H., W.W.)
- Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China (D.D., J.H., S.T.)
| | - Roberto Scarsini
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Verona, Italy (S.F., R.S., P.A.D.S., G.P., F.R.)
| | - Jiayue Huang
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, The Smart Sensors Lab and Curam, University of Galway, Ireland (S.F., D.D., J.H., W.W.)
- Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China (D.D., J.H., S.T.)
| | - Paolo Alberto Del Sole
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Verona, Italy (S.F., R.S., P.A.D.S., G.P., F.R.)
| | - Qiang Zhao
- Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China (Q.Z.)
| | - Gabriele Pesarini
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Verona, Italy (S.F., R.S., P.A.D.S., G.P., F.R.)
| | - Andrew Simpkin
- School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Galway, Ireland (A.S.)
| | - William Wijns
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, The Smart Sensors Lab and Curam, University of Galway, Ireland (S.F., D.D., J.H., W.W.)
| | - Flavio Ribichini
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Verona, Italy (S.F., R.S., P.A.D.S., G.P., F.R.)
| | - Shengxian Tu
- Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China (D.D., J.H., S.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fezzi S, Huang J, Wijns W, Tu S, Ribichini F. Two birds with one stone: integrated assessment of coronary physiology and plaque vulnerability from a single angiographic view-a case report. Eur Heart J Case Rep 2023; 7:ytad309. [PMID: 37539351 PMCID: PMC10394304 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytad309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Physiology-guided coronary revascularization was shown to improve clinical outcomes in multiple patient subsets, whilst in those presenting with acute coronary syndromes, it seems to be associated with an excess of cardiovascular events. One of the major drawbacks in this setting is the potential deferral of non-flow-limiting but 'vulnerable' coronary plaques. Case summary A 40-year-old patient presented with a myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI). At the invasive coronary angiography (ICA) a sub-occlusive stenosis on his left circumflex artery was detected and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The treatment of a concomitant intermediate eccentric focal stenosis on the right coronary artery (RCA) was deferred after a negative pressure wire-based physiological assessment. The patient was re-admitted 9 months later due to a recurrent NSTEMI, and a severe progression of the deferred RCA lesion was found at the ICA. In retrospect, an angiography-based assessment of physiological severity and plaque vulnerability of the non-culprit RCA stenosis by means of Murray's law-based QFR (μQFR) and radial wall strain (RWS) was performed. At baseline, μQFR value (0.90) corroborated the non-ischaemic findings of wire-based assessment. However, RWS analysis showed a marked hotspot (maximum RWS value 27.7%), indicating the presence of a vulnerable plaque. Discussion Radial wall strain is a novel biomechanical deformation index derived from coronary angiography. Segments with high RWS are associated with lipid-rich plaques that are prone to progression and plaque rupture. Therefore, the identification of RWS hotspots might potentially improve the risk stratification of non-culprit lesions and empower secondary prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Fezzi
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, The Smart Sensors Lab and Curam, University of Galway, University Road, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani, 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Jiayue Huang
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, The Smart Sensors Lab and Curam, University of Galway, University Road, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland
- Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Shengxian Tu
- Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Boutaleb AM, Ghafari C, Ungureanu C, Carlier S. Fractional flow reserve and non-hyperemic indices: Essential tools for percutaneous coronary interventions. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:2123-2139. [PMID: 37122527 PMCID: PMC10131021 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i10.2123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Hemodynamical evaluation of a coronary artery lesion is an important diagnostic step to assess its functional impact. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) received a class IA recommendation from the European Society of Cardiology for the assessment of angiographically moderate stenosis. FFR evaluation of coronary artery disease offers improvement of the therapeutic strategy, deferring unnecessary procedures for lesions with a FFR > 0.8, improving patients' management and clinical outcome. Post intervention, an optimal FFR > 0.9 post stenting should be reached and > 0.8 post drug eluting balloons. Non-hyperemic pressure ratio measurements have been validated in previous studies with a common threshold of 0.89. They might overestimate the hemodynamic significance of some lesions but remain useful whenever hyperemic agents are contraindicated. FFR remains the gold standard reference for invasive assessment of ischemia. We illustrate this review with two cases introducing the possibility to estimate also non-invasively FFR from reconstructed 3-D angiograms by quantitative flow ratio. We conclude introducing a hybrid approach to intermediate lesions (DFR 0.85-0.95) potentially maximizing clinical decision from all measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amine Mamoun Boutaleb
- Department of Cardiology, Ibn Rochd University Hospital, Casablanca 20230, Casablanca, Morocco
- Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, Mons 7000, Belgium
| | - Chadi Ghafari
- Department of Cardiology, University of Mons, Mons 7000, Belgium
| | - Claudiu Ungureanu
- Department of Cardiology, University of Mons, Mons 7000, Belgium
- Catheterization Unit, Jolimont Hospital, La Louvière 7100, Belgium, Belgium
| | - Stéphane Carlier
- Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, Mons 7000, Belgium
- Department of Cardiology, University of Mons, Mons 7000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
In Vivo Validation of a Novel Computational Approach to Assess Microcirculatory Resistance Based on a Single Angiographic View. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12111798. [PMID: 36573725 PMCID: PMC9692562 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12111798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: In spite of the undeniable clinical value of the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) in assessing the status of coronary microcirculation, its use globally remains very low. The aim of this study was to validate the novel single-view, pressure-wire- and adenosine-free angiographic microvascular resistance (AMR) index, having the invasive wire-based IMR as a reference standard. (2) Methods: one hundred and sixty-three patients (257 vessels) were investigated with pressure wire-based IMR. Microvascular dysfunction (CMD) was defined by IMR ≥ 25. AMR was independently computed from the diagnostic coronary angiography in a blinded fashion. (3) Results: AMR demonstrated a good correlation (r = 0.83, p < 0.001) and diagnostic performance (AUC 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91 to 0.97) compared with wire-based IMR. The best cutoff value for AMR in determining IMR ≥ 25 was 2.5 mmHg*s/cm. The overall diagnostic accuracy of AMR was 87.2% (95% CI: 83.0% to 91.3%), with a sensitivity of 93.5% (95% CI: 87.0% to 97.3%), a specificity of 82.7% (95% CI: 75.6% to 88.4%), a positive predictive value of 79.4% (95% CI: 71.2% to 86.1%) and a negative predictive value of 94.7% (95% CI: 89.3% to 97.8%). No difference in terms of CMD rate was described among different clinical presentations. (4) Conclusions: AMR derived solely from a single angiographic view is a feasible computational alternative to pressure wire-based IMR, with good diagnostic accuracy in assessing CMD.
Collapse
|