OPTImized coronary interventions eXplaIn the bEst cliNical outcomEs (OPTI-XIENCE) study. Rationale and study design

INTRODUCTION

Clinical events may occur after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), particularly in complex lesions and complex patients. The optimization of PCI result, using pressure guidewire and intracoronary imaging techniques, may reduce the risk of these events. The hypothesis of the present study is that the clinical outcome of patients with indication of PCI and coronary stent implantation that are at high risk of events can be improved with an unrestricted use of intracoronary tools that allow PCI optimization.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Observational prospective multicenter international study, with a follow-up of 12 months, including 1064 patients treated with a cobalt‑chromium everolimus-eluting stent. Inclusion criteria include any of the following: Lesion length > 28 mm; Reference vessel diameter < 2.5 mm or > 4.25 mm; Chronic total occlusion; Bifurcation with side branch ≥2.0 mm;Ostial lesion; Left main lesion; In-stent restenosis; >2 lesions stented in the same vessel; Treatment of >2 vessels; Acute myocardial infarction; Renal insufficiency; Left ventricular ejection fraction <30 %; Staged procedure. The control group will be comprised by a similar number of matched patients included in the "extended risk" cohort of the XIENCE V USA study. The primary endpoint will be the 1-year rate of target lesion failure (TLF) (composite of ischemia-driven TLR, myocardial infarction (MI) related to the target vessel, or cardiac death related to the target vessel). Secondary endpoints will include overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, acute myocardial infarction, TVR, TLR, target vessel failure, and definitive or probable stent thrombosis at 1 year.

IMPLICATIONS

The ongoing OPTI-XIENCE study will contribute to the growing evidence supporting the use of intra-coronary imaging techniques for stent optimization in patients with complex coronary lesions.

Long-Term Outcomes of Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Patients With Atherosclerotic Erectile Dysfunction not Responding to PDE-5-Inhibitors

PURPOSE

Endovascular therapy of erection-related arteries was shown to be a promising treatment option for patients with severe erectile dysfunction. Purpose of this study was to assess the longer-term safety and clinical success rate of endovascular revascularization of erection-related arteries with the Angiolite BTK stent in patients with arteriogenic erectile dysfunction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 147 consecutive men (63.5±9.3 years) with erectile dysfunction due to 345 atherosclerotic lesions underwent endovascular revascularization. Patients received an International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-15 questionnaire at 30.3±7.2 months (follow-up [FU] period no less than 18 months) after stenting. An improvement by 4 points in the erectile function domain consisting of 6 questions (IIEF-6) was defined as minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 99% of lesions. One major adverse event occurred after endovascular revascularization. Sixty-eight (46%) patients completed their latest FU at least 18 months following the last intervention. Minimal clinically important difference was achieved in 54% (37/68) of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with arteriogenic erectile dysfunction not responding to phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors (PDE-5-Is), endovascular therapy with a novel thin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent is a safe and effective treatment option during short- and longer-term FU.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Patients with severe erectile dysfunction profit greatly from endovascular therapy of erection-related arteries. Stable clinical outcomes are seen beyond a 1-year timeframe. It is proven that, the drug-eluting stent therapy for atherosclerotic ED in patients who have not responded to PDE-5-I therapy is safe and effective during longer-term follow-up.

Endovascular Therapy for Arteriogenic Erectile Dysfunction With a Novel Sirolimus-Eluting Stent

BACKGROUND

Arteriogenic erectile dysfunction is a common disease oftentimes not satisfactory treatable with medical therapy.

AIM

To assess the safety and clinical success rate of endovascular revascularization of erection-related arteries with the angiolite BTK stent in patients with arteriogenic erectile dysfunction.

METHODS

A total of 100 consecutive men (61.8 ± 10 years) with atherosclerotic lesions in erection-related arteries agreed to participate and were included into a single-center all-comers registry. Endovascular therapy with angiolite BTK drug-eluting stents was performed on a total of 211 lesions. Patients received a baseline International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-15 questionnaire at first presentation and 3 and 12 months after stenting. An improvement by 4 points in the erectile function domain consisting of 6 questions (IIEF-6) was defined as minimal clinically important difference. A total of 24 patients with 52 stented arterial lesions underwent angiographic follow-up of the initially treated arterial side during secondary revascularization of the contralateral side (angiographic sub-study).

OUTCOME

Clinical improvement of erections in 100 patients undergoing endovascular revascularization of erection-related arteries.

RESULTS

No major adverse events occurred during endovascular revascularization or within 30 days thereafter. Technical success was achieved in all lesions and procedural success in all patients. At 1 year, 55 of 97 patients (56.7%) improved by at least 4 points in IIEF-6 score and thus achieved a clinically relevant improvement of erectile function.In the angiographic sub-study, arterial patency and binary restenosis were observed in 46 of 52 (88.5%) and in 8 of 52 (15.4%), respectively, after a mean follow-up of 9.6 ± 5.8 months.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

In patients with arteriogenic erectile dysfunction, endovascular therapy with a novel thin-strut sirolimus eluting stent is a safe and feasible treatment option.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

This real-world arterial revascularization registry included patients with a multitude of risk factors for ED, thereby representing the heterogeneity in patients in the clinical practice, which is one of its strengths but also one of its weaknesses. Another strength was the focus being laid on analyzing outcomes of patients with arteriogenic ED using only a single endovascular device. Further studies are warranted to better define subgroups of patients with impaired clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Within the present all-comers registry, endovascular therapy of erectile dysfunction with the angiolite BTK stent was shown to be a safe and feasible treatment option resulting in clinical improvement rates comparable to earlier clinical trials although also showing that further research is warranted to define patient subgroups with particular benefits of endovascular therapy. Schönhofen J, Räber L, Knöchel J, et al. Endovascular Therapy for Arteriogenic Erectile Dysfunction With a Novel Sirolimus-Eluting Stent. J Sex Med 2021;18:315-326.

Thin, very thin, or ultrathin-strut biodegradable or durable polymer-coated drug-eluting stents

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current article will review recently published clinical studies that evaluate very thin or ultrathin-strut drug-eluting stents (DES), focusing on major randomized clinical trials in broad patient populations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple randomized trials recently assessed the clinical performance of novel very thin to ultrathin-strut DES. Most randomized trials established noninferiority of the novel device. To date, only one major randomized clinical trial (i.e., BIOFLOW V) showed superiority of an ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent over a very thin-strut durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in a relatively broad patient population. There are signals that the same ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent may improve clinical outcome in specific patient populations. For example, in the randomized BIOSTEMI trial, 1-year superiority of the ultrathin-strut DES was found in patients presenting with an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Yet, substudies of large randomized trials that assessed patients with small-vessel treatment showed equivocal results.

SUMMARY

Although two randomized trials showed advantages for ultrathin-strut DES, other clinical trials provided no significant evidence that ultrathin-strut DES improve clinical outcome. The question whether ultrathin-strut DES may reduce the repeat revascularization risk following implantation in small vessels is a matter of further debate and future research.