Total neoadjuvant therapy vs standard therapy of locally advanced rectal cancer with high-risk factors for failure

Comparison of Standard Neoadjuvant Therapy and Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Terms of Effectiveness in Patients Diagnosed with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Background/Objectives: The study aimed to compare the treatment effectiveness of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing standard neoadjuvant therapy or total neoadjuvant therapy. It also sought to identify prognostic factors for disease-free survival and overall survival and parameters predictive of pathological complete response. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 239 patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer between 2016 and 2022 at several medical centers in Turkey. Clinical data, including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy types, chemotherapy regimens, surgical outcomes, and survival metrics, were collected. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate prognostic factors for disease-free survival and overall survival and logistic regression to identify predictors of pathological complete response. Results: Among 239 patients, 46.9% received total neoadjuvant therapy, while 53.1% underwent standard neoadjuvant therapy. Total neoadjuvant therapy was associated with a significantly higher pathological complete response rate (45.5% vs. 14.9% in standard neoadjuvant therapy; p < 0.001) and longer disease-free survival (median 124.2 vs. 72.4 months). The 3-year overall survival rate for all patients was 90.7%, and disease-free survival was 76.8%. Multivariate analysis identified pathological complete response (HR: 2.34), total neoadjuvant therapy (HR: 5.12), and type of surgery (HR: 8.12) as independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival, and pathological complete response and absence of lymphovascular invasion as independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Logistic regression analysis showed that total neoadjuvant therapy (OR: 4.40) and initial neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR: 2.02) were independent predictors of achieving pathological complete response. Conclusions: Total neoadjuvant therapy significantly improves pathological complete response rates, disease-free survival, and overall survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer compared to standard neoadjuvant therapy. Total neoadjuvant therapy and achieving pathological complete response are strong independent prognostic factors for both disease-free survival and overall survival, suggesting that a more intensive neoadjuvant approach may lead to better outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer. The increased pathological complete responses rate with total neoadjuvant therapy has created an opportunity for the development of new treatment modalities and the advancement of non-surgical management strategies in the future.

Neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer-one year follow-up results of standard versus total neoadjuvant strategies

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) poses a significantly challenge in clinical management, requiring a multimodal treatment approach. Among innovative strategies, Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) has emerged, delivering all planned chemotherapy before surgery.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to evaluate the real-world application and efficacy of TNT and to compare it with the non-TNT standard strategy.

METHODS

This retrospective study compared locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma patients treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) in 2022 with those who underwent traditional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in 2020-2021. The primary endpoints were the pathologic complete response rate and the sustained clinical complete response rate in patients under W&W.

RESULTS

Among 107 patients (54.2% male, mean age 62.48 years), non-TNT (67 patients) and TNT (40 patients) mean follow-ups were 26.7 and 8.2 months, respectively. No differences in gender(p = 0.163), staging (p = 0.707), or location (p = 0.727) were noted. TNT patients received more short-course radiotherapy (42.5% vs1.5%, p < 0.001). Clinical responses favored TNT (p = 0.030) with no significant differences in pathological responses, recurrence rates, or survival. TNT exhibited higher chemotherapy completion (p = 0.007) and lower adverse events (p < 0.001). Post-surgery events showed no significant differences (p = 0.470). Single center with retrospective design and carries limitations that may restrict the generalizability of the findings and the relatively short follow-up duration are our main limitations.

CONCLUSION

Our data add to the body of literature favoring the TNT treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer, aiming to achieve comparable complete response rates with less adverse events.

Evaluation of racial/ethnic disparities in surgical outcomes after rectal cancer resection: An ACS-NSQIP analysis

Background

Disparities exist the management of rectal cancer. We sought to evaluate short-term surgical outcomes among different racial/ethnic groups following rectal cancer resection.

Materials and Methods

National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2016-2019) was queried. Patients undergoing rectal cancer resection were categorized by race/ethnicity. Circumferential resection margin positivity rate and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. 1:1 Propensity score matching (PSM) was used.

Results

Of 1,753 patients, 80.2 % were White, 7.6 % Black, 8.5 % Asian and 3.7 % Hispanic. On unadjusted analysis, Hispanic patients presented longer operative time(p = 0.029), and Black patients higher postoperative ileus(p = 0.003) and readmission(p = 0.023) rates. After PSM, Hispanics had a significantly higher circumferential resection margin positivity rate(p = 0.032), Black patients higher postoperative ileus rate(p = 0.014) and longer LOS(p = 0.0118) when compared to White counterparts.

Conclusion

Racial disparities were found in short-term postoperative outcomes. Hispanic patients presented higher margin positivity rate and Black patients worst 30-day postoperative outcomes. Comparative studies evaluating trends and a higher number of minority patients included in databases are warranted.

Advancements in nanomedicine: Precision delivery strategies for male pelvic malignancies - Spotlight on prostate and colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Pelvic malignancies consistently pose significant global health challenges, adversely affecting the well-being of the male population. It is anticipated that clinicians will continue to confront these cancers in their practice. Nanomedicine offers promising strategies that revolutionize the treatment of male pelvic malignancies by providing precise delivery methods that aim to improve the efficacy of therapeutic outcomes while minimizing side effects. Nanoparticles are designed to encapsulate therapeutic agents and selectively target cancer cells. They can also be loaded with theragnostic agents, enabling multifunctional capabilities.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to summarize the latest nanomedicine research into clinical applications, focusing on nanotechnology-based treatment strategies for male pelvic malignancies, encompassing chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and other cutting-edge therapies. The review is structured to assist physicians, particularly those with limited knowledge of biochemistry and bioengineering, in comprehending the functionalities and applications of nanomaterials.

METHODS

Multiple databases, including PubMed, the National Library of Medicine, and Embase, were utilized to locate and review recently published articles on advancements in nano-drug delivery for prostate and colorectal cancers.

CONCLUSION

Nanomedicine possesses considerable potential in improving therapeutic outcomes and reducing adverse effects for male pelvic malignancies. Through precision delivery methods, this emerging field presents innovative treatment modalities to address these challenging diseases. Nevertheless, the majority of current studies are in the preclinical phase, with a lack of sufficient evidence to fully understand the precise mechanisms of action, absence of comprehensive pharmacotoxicity profiles, and uncertainty surrounding long-term consequences.

Increased Pathologic Downstaging with Induction versus Consolidation Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy-A National Cancer Database Analysis

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is the recommended treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. The optimal sequence of TNT is debated: induction (chemotherapy first) or consolidation (chemoradiation first)? We aim to evaluate the practice patterns and clinical outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy with either induction or consolidation regiments in the United States for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database for patients with clinical stage II or stage III rectal cancer, diagnosed between 2006 and 2017, who underwent total neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery.

RESULTS

From 2006 to 2017, we identified 8999 patients and found that the utilization of induction chemotherapy increased from 2.0% to 35.0%. TNT resulted in pathologic downstaging 46.7% of the time and a pathologic complete response 11.6% of the time. Induction chemotherapy lead to higher pathologic downstaging (58% vs. 44.7%, p < 0.001) and pathologic complete responses (16.8% vs. 10.7%, p < 0.001). Similar trends held true in a multivariate analysis and subset analysis of stage II and III disease.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that induction chemotherapy may be preferred over consolidation chemotherapy when downstaging prior to oncologic resection is desired. The optimal treatment plan for total neoadjuvant therapy is multi-factorial and requires further elucidation.

Total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard neoadjuvant treatment strategies for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

This study compared the advantages and disadvantages of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategies for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, compared with the more traditional multimodal neoadjuvant management strategies of long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT).

METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of exclusively RCTs was undertaken, comparing survival, recurrence, pathological, radiological, and oncological outcomes. The last date of the search was 14 December 2022.

RESULTS

In total, 15 RCTs involving 4602 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, conducted between 2004 and 2022, were included. TNT improved overall survival compared with LCRT (HR 0.73, 95 per cent credible interval 0.60 to 0.92) and SCRT (HR 0.67, 0.47 to 0.95). TNT also improved rates of distant metastasis compared with LCRT (HR 0.81, 0.69 to 0.97). Reduced overall recurrence was observed for TNT compared with LCRT (HR 0.87, 0.76 to 0.99). TNT showed an improved pCR compared with both LCRT (risk ratio (RR) 1.60, 1.36 to 1.90) and SCRT (RR 11.32, 5.00 to 30.73). TNT also showed an improvement in cCR compared with LCRT (RR 1.68, 1.08 to 2.64). There was no difference between treatments in disease-free survival, local recurrence, R0 resection, treatment toxicity or treatment compliance.

CONCLUSION

This study provides further evidence that TNT has improved survival and recurrence benefits compared with current standards of care, and may increase the number of patients suitable for organ preservation, without negatively influencing treatment toxicity or compliance.

DSTN Hypomethylation Promotes Radiotherapy Resistance of Rectal Cancer by Activating the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway

PURPOSE

Although surgical resection combined with neoadjuvant radiation therapy can reduce the local recurrence rate of rectal cancer, not all patients benefit from neoadjuvant radiation therapy. Therefore, screening for patients with rectal cancer who are sensitive or resistant to radiation therapy has great clinical significance.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with rectal cancer were selected according to postoperative tumor regression grade, and tumor samples were taken for detection. Differential genes between radiation-resistant and radiation-sensitive tissues were screened and validated by Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip, proteomics, Agena MassARRAY methylation, reverse transcription quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, and immunohistochemistry. In vitro and in vivo functional experiments verified the role of DSTN. Protein coimmunoprecipitation, western blot, and immunofluorescence were used to investigate the mechanisms of DSTN-related radiation resistance.

RESULTS

DSTN was found to be highly expressed (P < .05) and hypomethylated (P < .01) in rectal cancer tissues resistant to neoadjuvant radiation therapy. Follow-up data confirmed that patients with high expression of DSTN in neoadjuvant radiation therapy-resistant rectal cancer tissues had shorter disease-free survival (P < .05). DSTN expression increased after methyltransferase inhibitor inhibition of DNA methylation in colorectal cancer cells (P < .05). In vitro and in vivo experiments showed that knockdown of DSTN promoted the sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to radiation therapy, and overexpression of DSTN promoted the resistance of colorectal cancer cells to radiation (P < .05). The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway was activated in colorectal cancer cells overexpressing DSTN. β-catenin was highly expressed in radiation therapy-resistant tissues, and there was a linear correlation between the expression of DSTN and β-catenin (P < .0001). Further studies showed that DSTN can bind to β-catenin and increase its stability.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of DNA methylation and the expression level of DSTN can be used as biomarkers to predict the sensitivity of neoadjuvant radiation therapy for rectal cancer. DSTN and β-catenin are also expected to become a reference for the selection of neoadjuvant radiation therapy.

Total neoadjuvant therapy versus chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Total neoadjuvant therapy is a promising treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, utilizing either short-course radiotherapy or long-course chemoradiotherapy, but their relative efficacy remains unclear. The aim of this Bayesian network meta-analysis was to investigate clinical outcomes amongst patients receiving total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy or long-course chemoradiotherapy, and those receiving long-course chemoradiotherapy alone.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed. All studies that compared at least two of these three treatments for locally advanced rectal cancer were included. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response rate, and survival outcomes were adopted as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty cohorts were included. Compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy, both total neoadjuvant therapy with long-course chemoradiotherapy (OR 1.78, 95 per cent c.i. 1.43 to 2.26) and total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy (OR 1.75, 95 per cent c.i. 1.23 to 2.50) improved the pathological complete response rate. Similar benefits were observed in the sensitivity and subgroup analyses, except for short-course radiotherapy with one to two cycles of chemotherapy. No significant differences in survival outcomes were found amongst the three treatments. Long-course chemoradiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy (HR 0.44, 95 per cent c.i. 0.20 to 0.99) exhibited higher disease-free survival than long-course chemoradiotherapy alone.

CONCLUSION

Compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy, both short-course radiotherapy with greater than or equal to three cycles of chemotherapy and total neoadjuvant therapy with long-course chemoradiotherapy can improve the pathological complete response rate, and long-course chemoradiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy may lead to a marginal benefit in disease-free survival. The pathological complete response rate and survival outcomes are similar for total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy or long-course chemoradiotherapy.

Total neoadjuvant therapy or standard chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Aim

The effectiveness of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) on patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is controversy. This study aims to compare the prognostic value of TNT with standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for LARC.

Methods

We searched databases (Embase [Ovid], Medline [Ovid], PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) for articles published between January 1, 2000, and March 10, 2022. Studies on evaluating the effects of TNT and standard CRT on the prognosis of LARC were included. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

19 primary studies, involving 10 randomized controlled trials, 3 prospective studies and 6 retrospective studies, with data on 5,074 patients treated for LARC were included in the meta-analysis. Statistical analyses revealed that, compared with standard CRT, TNT significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.65–0.90, I² = 30%, P = 0.17), DFS (HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.74–0.97, I² = 11%, P = 0.35), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS, HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65–0.90, I² = 0%, P = 0.50), pathological complete response rate (pCR, OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.61–2.22, I² = 0%, P = 0.47), and R0 resection rate (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.07–1.67, I² = 16%, P = 0.28), but local recurrence-free survival (LRFS, HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.90–1.39, I² = 4%, P = 0.37).

Conclusions

Comprehensive literature research shows that TNT showed excellent short-term efficacy in terms of pCR and R0 resection rate while also improved the long-term outcomes of OS, DFS and DMFS, might become a new standard of treatment in patients with LARC. Even so, more studies and longer follow-up were still warranted.

Clinical and dosimetric comparison of acute bowel toxicities in carcinoma rectum patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy by using standard 3DCRT VS IMRT

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cancer worldwide. It is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in males and the second in females, with more than 1.4 million new cancer cases every year. Around 40,000 people will be effected by rectal cancer for every year, with a 65% survival rate from past 5-year were estimated. The age standardized rate (ASR) for CRC in India is low at 7.2 per 100,000 population in males and 5.1 per 100,000 populations in women. However overall incidence and survival rates were increased due to the screening and early detection. Materials and Methods: The proposed study is a prospective, hospital based, comparative cohort study including the cases admitted to Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana with clinical features and investigations suggestive of carcinoma rectum and fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be taken up for study. Patients considered as per inclusion criteria admitted in Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana were selected and the dosimetric data was collected from the TPS planning system and clinically relevant data was collected from the patient’s record from hospital digital interface system.

Outcomes in 36 Patients with Stage IIIA-N2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung Treated with Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin as Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Prospective Study from a Single Center

Background

Whether nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin as neoadjuvant therapy can benefit patients with resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the lung remains unclear. This prospective study aimed to investigate outcomes in patients with stage IIIA-N2 squamous cell carcinoma of the lung treated with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin as neoadjuvant therapy.

Material/Methods

Patients with stage IIIA-N2 squamous cell carcinoma of the lung were treated with nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m², days 1, 8, and 15) and carboplatin (5 mg/(mL·min), day 1) for two 21-day cycles. The patients were followed every 3 months for 2 years and every 6 months after that. The primary endpoint was the downstaging rate. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), margin-free (R0) resection, pathologic complete response (pCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

Among the 36 enrolled patients, 33 completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 23 underwent surgery. The preoperative ORR was 50.0% (18/36). R0 resection was achieved in 22 (95.7%) of 23 patients. Major pathologic response and pCR were achieved in 8 (34.8%) and 2 (8.7%) patients, respectively. The overall downstaging rate was 47.8% (11/23). The median follow-up was 39.8 (32.5–41.0) months. For patients who underwent surgery, the median PFS and OS were 31.4 (95%CI: 10.4-not reached (NR)) and 45.0 (95%CI: 22.6-NR) months, respectively. The most common adverse events were neutropenia, anemia, and leukopenia.

Conclusions

This study preliminarily indicated a favorable effect of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin as neoadjuvant therapy without significant adverse events for stage IIIA-N2 squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to verify these results.