A clinical trial of mefloquine in the treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria

Neglect of Plasmodium vivax malaria

Plasmodium vivax infects 130-435 million of the 2.6 billion people living at risk of infection. Recent studies suggest that vivax malaria can become lethal in a similar way to severe falciparum malaria. First-line therapies remain unchanged after 50 years. Despite evidence of failing chloroquine efficacy, little work has assessed the problem or explored alternative therapies. Primaquine treatment, the only therapeutic option against relapse, might also be failing. No licensed primary chemoprophylactic agent protects travelers from relapse. Misdiagnosis of species now affects clinical decisions resulting in inadequate therapy for P. falciparum and P. vivax. All of these factors demonstrate the lack of research on P. vivax.

Mefloquine Is Highly Efficacious against Chloroquine-Resistant Plasmodium vivax Malaria and Plasmodium falciparum Malaria in Papua, Indonesia

BACKGROUND

During the period of 1996-1999, we prospectively monitored 243 Javanese adults and children after arriving in Papua, Indonesia, and microscopically documented each new case of malaria by active surveillance.

METHODS

In a randomized, open-label, comparative malaria treatment trial, 72 adults and 50 children received chloroquine for each incident case of malaria, and 74 adults and 47 children received mefloquine.

RESULTS

Among 975 primary treatment courses, the cumulative 28-day curative efficacies were 26% and 82% for chloroquine against Plasmodium falciparum malaria and Plasmodium vivax malaria, respectively. Mefloquine cure rates were far superior (96% against P. falciparum malaria and 99.6% against P. vivax malaria).

CONCLUSIONS

Mefloquine is a useful alternative treatment for P. vivax malaria and P. falciparum malaria in areas such as Papua, where chloroquine is still recommended as the first-line therapeutic agent.

Atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride followed by primaquine for treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria in Thailand

Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax malaria has been reported in several geographical areas. The P. vivax life-cycle includes dormant hepatic parasites (hypnozoites) that cause relapsing malaria weeks to years after initial infection. Curative therapy must therefore target both the erythrocytic and hepatic stages of infection. Between July 1997 and June 1998, we conducted an open-label study in Thailand to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a sequential regimen of combination atovaquone (1000 mg) and proguanil hydrochloride (400 mg), once daily for 3 days, followed by primaquine (30 mg daily for 14 days) for treatment of vivax malaria. All 46 patients who completed the 3-day course of atovaquone-proguanil cleared their parasitaemia within 2-6 days. During a 12-week follow-up period in 35 patients, recurrent parasitaemia occurred in 2. Both recurrent episodes occurred 8 weeks after the start of therapy, consistent with relapse from persistent hypnozoites rather than recrudescence of persistent blood-stage parasites. The dosing regimen was well tolerated. Results of this trial indicate that atovaquone-proguanil followed by primaquine is safe and effective for treatment of vivax malaria.

Clinical application of mefloquine pharmacokinetics in the treatment of P falciparum malaria

Malaria remains a major public health problem in large areas of the world. One of the major factors responsible for the resurgence is the emergence of Plasmodium falciparum, resistant to available antimalarials. An antimalarial, mefloquine, has been considered since its introduction as a promising alternative antimalarial drug to overcome the situation of widespread multidrug resistant P falciparum. Pharmacokinetic studies of mefloquine have been investigated in several groups of subjects either as mefloquine alone or as combined regimens. The oral absorption of mefloquine is relatively rapid, reaching peak concentrations within 24 hours. Metabolism takes place in the liver, with carboxymefloquine as a major metabolite. Mefloquine has a large apparent volume of distribution of 200 L and is highly bound (98%) to plasma proteins. The elimination is slow; the terminal half-life is 13 10 to 14 days in Thai patients with falciparum malaria. Vomiting within 1 hour of drug administration has an influence on blood concentrations of mefloquine and this may result in treatment failure. The whole blood concentrations of mefloquine on the first two days of treatment are important determinants of parasitological response. There appear to be no pharmacokinetic interactions between mefloquine and the other two components of Fansimef in patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. The advantage of this combination over mefloquine alone in multidrug resistant P falciparum is still debatable. However, recent data seem to support the higher efficacy of Fansimef over mefloquine alone. Concurrent administration of antibiotics, ie ampicillin and tetracycline with mefloquine results in a significant increase in maximum concentration, reduction of the apparent volume of distribution and shortening of the terminal elimination half-life of mefloquine. An antiemetic drug metoclopramide accelerates the absorption of mefloquine and increases the maximum concentration. In contrast, mefloquine concentrations are decreased in the presence of an antimalarial, artesunate. Primaquine has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of mefloquine when given concurrently.

Mefloquine. A review of its antimalarial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy

Mefloquine is an orally administered blood schizontocide. Initial dose-finding and comparative studies performed between 1977 and 1989 demonstrated efficacy of mefloquine as prophylaxis in nonimmune individuals and in the suppression and treatment of malaria in adults and children caused by multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. It was also effective against P. vivax infection, while data concerning the treatment of P. ovale and P. malariae infections were limited. In an attempt to delay the emergence of resistance to this promising antimalarial agent, mefloquine was combined with sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine. Although initial clinical trials indicated that this regimen was effective in preventing and treating falciparum malaria, recent treatment failures, the potential for severe dermatological reactions and lack of therapeutic advantage over mefloquine alone has prompted the World Health Organization to recommended that the combination be no longer used for treatment or prophylaxis of malaria. Mefloquine is generally well tolerated in both adults and children, with nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, headache, dizziness, rash, pruritus and abdominal pain being the most common adverse effects, although it is difficult to distinguish between disease- and treatment-related events. The incidence of these adverse effects is similar to or lower than those observed with other antimalarial agents. Cardiovascular changes, such as bradycardia, occasionally occur. The most notable adverse effects associated with mefloquine are neuropsychiatric disturbances; precipitation of such events should be closely monitored and requires termination of prophylaxis or therapy. The eventual emergence of resistance to mefloquine, as with many other antimalarial agents, was inevitable. Mefloquine resistance is established in certain areas of Thailand and may be becoming a growing problem in other regions of the world. In order to preserve the efficacy of mefloquine in non-resistant areas, this useful agent should be used with care and only prescribed for prophylaxis in travellers and treatment in areas of multidrug-resistant plasmodia. Future options to combat mefloquine resistance may include the combination of mefloquine with other antimalarial agents such as qinghaosu derivatives. Thus, with cautious use and possible combination with other agents, mefloquine is likely to remain an important treatment option for falciparum malaria, a widespread parasitic disease for which an increasing number of drugs have proved inadequate.