Sildenafil in management of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: report of two cases

Oral drugs used to treat persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn

Introduction:Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn (PPHN) is a life-threatening neonatal condition, mostly treated with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), intravenous prostaglandins, oral bosentan, sildenafil and tadalafil. However, the utility of non-oral agents is limited in PPHN for their side effects and inconvenient deliveries. Therefore, oral agents such as bosentan, sildenafil and tadalafil are becoming appealing for their satisfactory efficacy, easy mode of administration and acceptable side effects. Areas covered: We conducted a comprehensive search on Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Sciences concerning the use of bosentan, sildenafil and tadalafil to treat PPHN and summarized their efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics. Expert opinion: Current randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the favorable responses and tolerable side effects of bosentan and sildenafil. Nevertheless, those RCTs are small and only one study has described the pharmacokinetics of sildenafil in neonates. Accordingly, bosentan, sildenafil and tadalafil remain off-label in clinical use. More well-designed RCTs with large samples and long-term follow-up and pharmacometrics studies are needed to demonstrate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of bosentan, sildenafil and tadalafil in PPHN.

Sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates

BACKGROUND

Persistent pulmonary hypertension in the neonate (PPHN) is associated with high mortality. Currently, the therapeutic mainstay for PPHN consists of assisted ventilation and administration of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO). However, nitric oxide is costly, and its use may not be appropriate in resource-poor settings. Approximately 30% of patients fail to respond to iNO. High concentrations of phosphodiesterases in the pulmonary vasculature have led to the use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors such as sildenafil or milrinone.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil for treatment of pulmonary hypertension in neonates.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 3), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to 18 April 2017), Embase (1980 to 18 April 2017), and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL; 1982 to 18 April 2017). We searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of sildenafil compared with placebo or other pulmonary vasodilators, irrespective of dose, route, and duration of administration, in neonates with pulmonary hypertension, if investigators reported any of the prespecified outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We assessed the methodological quality of trials regarding how bias was minimised at study entry, during study intervention, and at outcomes measurement. We extracted data on relevant outcomes; we estimated the effect size and reported it as risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), or mean difference (MD), as appropriate. We applied the I2 test of heterogeneity and used GRADE to assess the quality of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

For this update, we identified two additional studies, for a total of five eligible trials that enrolled 166 infants. The methodological quality of these studies ranged from low to high risk of bias. Three studies were performed in resource-limited settings, where iNO and high-frequency ventilation were not available at the time of the study. One study compared sildenafil versus active controls, and another study evaluated sildenafil as adjuvant therapy to iNO. When comparing sildenafil with placebo, investigators noted significant reduction in mortality in the sildenafil alone group (three studies, 77 participants; typical RR 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 0.56; I2 = 0% - none; typical RR -0.36, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.18; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome 3, 95% CI 2 to 6; I2 = 39% - low). Trials reported no significant differences in mortality upon comparison of the sildenafil group versus the active control group (one study, 65 participants; typical RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.75), or when iNO was administered to both groups (one study, 24 participants; typical RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.26 to 6.28). Physiological parameters of oxygenation (oxygenation index, partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2)) suggested steady improvement after the first dose of sildenafil. None of the included trials identified any clinically important side effects. We rated the quality of evidence as low to very low owing to imprecision related to small sample size and unclear methodological features.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Sildenafil used for treatment of pulmonary hypertension has potential for reducing mortality and improving oxygenation in neonates, especially in resource-limited settings where iNO is not available. However, large-scale randomised trials comparing sildenafil versus active controls (other pulmonary vasodilators) and providing follow-up for survivors are needed to assess the comparative effectiveness and long-term safety of sildenafil versus other pulmonary vasodilators.

Outcome of oral sildenafil in neonatal persistent pulmonary hypertension of non-cardiac causes

BACKGROUND

Despite recent treatment modalities, mortality from persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN) remains significant. In instances where infants do not respond to inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), oral sildenafil could hold promise as a selective pulmonary vasodilator. Further studies are still needed to explore its efficacy and safety in newborns with PPHN.

OBJECTIVES

To validate the efficacy of oral sildenafil on oxygenation and its short-term safety in newborns with persistent pulmonary hypertension.

METHODS

A total of 27 newborns ≥36 weeks gestational age were admitted to NICU with oxygenation index (OI) ≥15 and confirmed diagnosis of PPHN with echocardiography. Oral sildenafil given at a dose of 1-2 mg/kg every 6 hours. We monitored improvement in oxygenation, safety and short-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 27 newborns, oral sildenafil was efficacious in 21 patients (78%) with reduction of OI from 34.9 ± 9.6 to 13 ± 3.2 (p <  0.001), increase of PaO2 from 42.4 ± 13.5 to 78 ± 11.5 mmHg (<0.001), and reduction of FiO2 from 1.0 ± 0 to 0.3 ± 0.06 (<0.001). OI decreased by 6.3 % from baseline after the first dose of sildenafil and continued to decrease with subsequent doses. In 6 patients (22%) sildenafil did not work; 5/6 patients (18%) transferred to another tertiary NICU and one patient (4%) died of sepsis. None of the patients had significant systemic hypotension.

CONCLUSION

Oral sildenafil is a promising pulmonary vasodilator in patients with PPHN, particularly in medical facilities with no available iNO and ECMO. It is well tolerated with no significant short term complications.

Sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates

BACKGROUND

Persistent pulmonary hypertension in neonates (PPHN) is associated with high mortality. Currently, the therapeutic mainstay for PPHN is assisted ventilation and administration of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO). However, nitric oxide is costly and may not be appropriate in resource-poor settings. Approximately 30% of patients fail to respond to iNO. High concentrations of phosphodiesterases in the pulmonary vasculature has led to the use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors such as sildenafil or milrinone.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension in neonates.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL databases were searched from their inception until December 2010; Clinicaltrials.gov web site, the reference lists of identified trials, and abstracts of meetings were searched without any language restriction.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of sildenafil compared with placebo or other pulmonary vasodilators, irrespective of dose, route and duration of administration in neonates with PPHN, were included if the trial reported any of the pre-specified outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The methodological quality of the trials was assessed regarding how bias was minimized at study entry, during study intervention and at outcomes measurement. Data on relevant outcomes were extracted and the effect size was estimated and reported as relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD) and weighted mean difference (MD) as appropriate. The I-squared (I(2)) test of heterogeneity was applied.

MAIN RESULTS

Three eligible trials that enrolled 77 infants were identified. The methodological quality of the studies indicated low-moderate risk of bias. All studies were performed in resource-limited settings where iNO and high frequency ventilation were not available at the time of study. There was significant reduction in mortality in the sildenafil group (typical RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.57; typical RD -0.38, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.16; Number needed to treat to benefit 3, 95% CI 2 to 6). Physiological parameters of oxygenation (oxygenation index, PaO(2)) suggested a steady improvement after the first dose of sildenafil. No clinically important side effects were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Sildenafil in the treatment of PPHN has significant potential especially in resource limited settings. However, a large scale randomised trial comparing sildenafil with the currently used vasodilator, inhaled nitric oxide, is needed to assess efficacy and safety.

Initial Experience with Sildenafil, Bosentan, and Nitric Oxide for Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Patients with Elevated Pulmonary Vascular Resistance before and after Orthotopic Heart Transplantation

Background. Although pulmonary hypertension complicating dilated cardiomyopathy has been shown to be a significant risk factor for graft failure after heart transplantation, the upper limits of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) that would contraindicate pediatric heart transplantation are not known. Methods. A retrospective review of all pediatric orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) performed at our institution from 2002 to 2007 was performed. Seven patients with PVR > 6 Wood's units (WU) prior to transplant were compared pre- and postoperatively with 20 matched controls with PVR < 6 WU. All pulmonary vasodilator therapies used are described as well as outcomes during the first year posttransplant. Results. The mean PVR prior to transplantation in the 7 study cases was 11.0 ± 4.6 (range 6–22) WU, compared to mean PVR of 3.07 ± 0.9 WU (0.56–4.5) in the controls (P = .27 × 10⁻⁶). All patients with elevated PVR were treated pre-OHT with either Sildenafil or Bosentan. Post-OHT, case patients received a combination of sildenafil, iloprost, and inhaled nitric oxide. All 7 case patients survived one year post-OHT, and there was no statistical difference between cases and controls for hospital stay, rejection/readmissions, or graft right ventricular failure. Mean PVR in the cases at one and three months post-OHT was not significantly different between the two groups. Only one of the cases required prolonged treatment with iloprost after OHT. Conclusions. A PVR above 6 WU should not be an absolute contraindication to heart transplantation in children.

Sildenafil acutely reverses the hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction response of the newborn pig

Sildenafil is a pulmonary vasodilator shown to be effective in neonates, but conflicting data exist regarding its effect on arterial oxygenation. To address this issue, we tested the sildenafil effect on the piglet's hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) response. A segmental lung atelectasis was created by obstructing the corresponding bronchus. Total pulmonary and specific flows to the atelectatic and contra-lateral lobes were measured by magnetic resonance (MR) before and 30-min post sildenafil (0.2 and 1 mg/kg i.v.) or saline administration. Flow was reduced (p < 0.01) in the atelectatic and increased in the contra-lateral lobe indicating an effective HPV response. Sildenafil at both doses significantly (p < 0.01) increased flow solely to the atelectatic lobe. At a dose of 1 mg/kg, sildenafil induced a decrease in Pao2 from 285 +/- 37 to 161 +/- 22 mm Hg (p < 0.01). We conclude that the HPV response in the newborn is capable of almost completely reducing blood flow to nonventilated lung units and is reversed following sildenafil i.v. administration in a dose-dependent manner. In the presence of lung parenchymal disease, the use of i.v. sildenafil as a pulmonary vasodilator may worsen arterial oxygenation by reversing the HPV response in nonventilated lung units.

Sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates

BACKGROUND

Persistent pulmonary hypertension in neonates (PPHN) is associated with high mortality. Currently, the therapeutic mainstay for PPHN is assisted ventilation and administration of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO). However, nitric oxide is costly and may not be appropriate in resource-poor settings. Approximately 30% of patients fail to respond to iNO. High concentrations of phosphodiesterases in the pulmonary vasculature has led to the use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors such as sildenafil or milrinone.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of Sildenafil in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension in neonates.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL databases were searched from their inception until March 2007; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Library, the reference lists of identified trials, and abstracts of meetings were searched without any language restriction.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of Sildenafil compared with placebo or other pulmonary vasodilators, irrespective of dose, route and duration of administration in neonates with PPHN, were included if the trial reported any of the pre-specified outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The methodological quality of the trials was assessed regarding how bias at study entry, study intervention and outcomes measurement was minimized. Data on relevant outcomes were extracted and the effect size was estimated and reported as relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD) and weighted mean difference (MD) as appropriate. The I-squared (I(2)) test of heterogeneity was applied.

MAIN RESULTS

Two small eligible trials (one full article and one abstract) were identified. The methodological quality of the trial presented in the full article was good. Information provided in the abstract was limited. The total number of enrolled patients in the two studies was 37. Both studies were performed in resource-limited settings where iNO and high frequency ventilation are not available. Both studies reported statistically significant improvement in oxygenation (reduction in oxygenation index) in the Sildenafil group. One study reported what would be, if replicated, a strongly protective effect on mortality (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03, 1.09) favoring the Sildenafil group. However, this result needs to be replicated in larger studies. No clinically important side effects were reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The safety and effectiveness of sildenafil in the treatment of PPHN has not yet been established and its use should be restricted within the context of randomized controlled trials. Further randomized controlled trials of adequate power comparing Sildenafil with other pulmonary vasodilators are needed in moderately ill infants with PPHN.