Direct Enumeration of Coliforms and Escherichia coli by Hydrophobic Grid Membrane Filter in 24 Hours using MUG

Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Minute Steaks Cooked under Selected Conditions

A national survey was conducted in Canada to determine consumer cooking practices for minute steaks (thin, mechanically tenderized beef cutlets). Results indicate that most Canadians prefer cooking minute steaks by pan frying and to a medium level of doneness. To identify safe cooking conditions, retail minute steaks (∼125 g), inoculated at three sites per steak with a five-strain cocktail of nontoxigenic Escherichia coli O157:H7 (6.1 log CFU per site), were cooked on a hot plate (200°C), mimicking a pan-frying scenario. The steaks (n = 5) were cooked for 4, 6, 8, or 10 min with turning over (flipping) up to four times at equal time intervals; or to 63 or 71°C at the thickest area with or without a tinfoil lid. When cooked for 4 min, E. coli O157:H7 was recovered from all inoculation sites, and the mean reductions at various sites (1.2 to 3.4 log CFU per site) were not different (P > 0.05), irrespective of the flipping frequency. When cooked for 6 min with flipping once or twice, or for 8 min with flipping once, E. coli O157:H7 was recovered from most sites; the mean reductions (3.8 to 5.3 log CFU per site) were not different (P > 0.05), but they were higher (P < 0.05) than those for steaks cooked for 4 min. When cooked for 10, 8, or 6 min with flipping once, twice, or three times, respectively, E. coli O157:H7 was eliminated from most sites, but sites with <5-log reductions were found. Reductions of E. coli O157:H7 by >5 log at all inoculation sites were attained when the steaks were cooked for 10 or 8 min with two or more or three or more flippings, respectively, or for 6 min with four flippings. When flipped twice during cooking to 63 or 71°C, E. coli O157:H7 was recovered from three or fewer sites; however, >5-log reductions throughout the steaks were only attained for the latter temperature, irrespective of whether the hot plate was covered with the tinfoil lid. Thus, turning over minute steaks twice during cooking to 71°C or flipping two, three, or four times with a cooking time of 10, 8, or 6 min could achieve 5-log reductions throughout the steaks.

Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Beef Roasts Cooked in Conventional or Convection Ovens or in a Slow Cooker under Selected Conditions

Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in beef roasts cooked under selected cooking conditions was evaluated. Eye of round roasts were each inoculated at five sites in the central plane with a five-strain cocktail of E. coli O157:H7 at ca. 6.3 log CFU per site and cooked to center temperatures of 56 to 71°C in a convection oven set at 120, 140, 180, or 200°C, in a conventional oven set at 120 or 210°C, and in a slow cooker set on high or low. Prime rib roasts were each inoculated at 10 sites throughout the roast with the same E. coli O157:H7 cocktail at ca. 6.6 log CFU per site and cooked in the conventional oven set at 140 or 180°C to center temperatures of 58 to 71°C. The number of sites yielding E. coli O157:H7 after cooking decreased with increasing roast center temperature for the eye of round roasts cooked in the convection oven or in the slow cooker at a given setting, but this trend was not apparent for roasts of either type cooked in the conventional oven. Reductions of E. coli O157 in both types of roasts were generally less at the center than at other locations, particularly locations closer to the surface of the meat. When eye of round roasts were cooked to the same center temperature in the convection oven, the reduction of E. coli O157:H7 increased with increasing oven temperature up to 180°C and decreased after that. The reduction of E. coli O157:H7 in replicate roasts cooked under conditions in which the organism was not eliminated during cooking mostly differed by >1 log CFU per site. However, E. coli O157:H7 was not recovered from any of the inoculation sites when eye of round roasts were cooked to 65, 60, 60, or 63°C in the convection oven set at 120, 140, 180, and 200°C, respectively; cooked to 63 or 71°C in the conventional oven set at 120 and 210°C, respectively; or cooked to 63°C in the slow cooker set at high or low. For prime rib roasts, E. coli O157:H7 was not recovered from any of the inoculation sites in roasts cooked to 71 or 58°C in the conventional oven set at 140 and 180°C, respectively.

Assessment of F-RNA coliphage as a potential indicator of enteric virus contamination of hog carcasses

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is common in pigs, and some swine HEV strains are closely related to human strains. The zoonotic transmission of HEV is now well established. HEV can be detected by molecular techniques, but the significance of the presence of viral nucleic acid is questionable when foods are subjected to virus inactivation treatments. F-RNA coliphages are attractive candidates as indicators for enteric viruses because they are similar in size and survival characteristics and can be rapidly cultured. Information on the contamination of hog carcasses with enteric or hepatic viruses during slaughter is lacking. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence and levels of contamination of hog carcasses with F-RNA coliphages, HEV, total aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and Escherichia coli at different stages of the dressing process. Hog carcasses entering the commercial slaughter facility are heavily contaminated with F-RNA coliphages and HEV. Subsequent processes such as scalding, singing, and pasteurization can reduce the incidence and levels of F-RNA coliphages and HEV substantially to almost undetectable levels. Large discrepancies between the amount of viral nucleic acid and infectious F-RNA coliphage particles, both at high levels and low levels of contamination, were observed. The prevalence and levels of viable F-RNA coliphages were lower than those of total aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and E. coli in the anal area and on random sites before pasteurization. At a research abattoir, there was no overall mean reduction of viable F-RNA coliphages recovered from random sites before pasteurization and after washing, whereas overall mean reductions of 1.2, 2.6, and 2.9 log CFU for total aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and E. coli, respectively, were obtained. These findings suggest that bacteria such as coliforms and E. coli may not be suitable as indicators for enteric viruses in a meat processing environment.

Electrolyzed oxidizing anode water as a sanitizer for use in abattoirs

The effectiveness of electrolyzed oxidizing anode (EOA) water (oxidation-reduction potential, 1,120 mV; pH 2.0) as a sanitizer for use in abattoirs was compared with the iodophor (IOD) Mikroklene (25 ppm), a sanitizer approved for use by regulatory authorities in Canada and the United States. A total of 240 swab (100 cm2) samples were obtained from 4 sites on the kill floor and 16 sites in the secondary processing areas, during two visits within a 4-week period to each of three meat packing plants, processing < or =50 animals per week. Swabs were obtained 12 h after the application of IOD and EOA and were analyzed for the presence of total aerobic bacteria, total coliforms, and total Escherichia coli. Total aerobic bacteria (log CFU/ 100 cm2) recovered from the 20 sample sites were lower (P < 0.0001) in EOA as compared with IOD (2.94 +/- 0.12 versus 3.75 +/- 0.12, respectively). Plant A was 1.5 times more likely (P < 0.0001) to have a sampling site positive for the presence of coliforms and E. coli than plants B and C. There was no difference (P > 0.05) between treatment IOD or EOA in the likelihood of obtaining a positive sample for the presence of total coliforms or E. coli among the three plants. When the kill floor and secondary processing areas are compared, the likelihood of obtaining a sample positive for coliforms or E. coli was similar (P > or = 0.05). Results indicate that EOA was more effective than IOD in reducing populations of total aerobic bacteria on equipment surfaces in the three meat packing plants studied. Because the likelihood of obtaining a positive sample for coliforms or E. coli in EOA as compared with IOD was similar, EOA may be a suitable alternative or complement to IOD as a sanitizer in small- to medium-sized abattoirs. Additional research is required to further evaluate the effectiveness of EOA to sanitize processing equipment on the basis of subsequent isolation of aerobes, coliforms, and E. coli from meat products.

Comparison of LST + MUG broth technique and conventional method for the enumeration of Escherichia coli in foods

AIMS

To reduce the analysis time needed for the enumeration of Escherichia coli, a rapid fluorogenic method (MUG) which takes only 48 h was compared with the standard most probable number (MPN) method which takes 6 days as described in the International Standards Organization (ISO). This study provides reliability data for the fluorogenic method applied to certain foods.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Both methods were applied to 500 food samples which were analysed for E. coli enumeration. Agreement between the two methods was found in 409 (81 x 8%) samples; 81 (16 x 2%) samples gave higher values by the fluorogenic method, and only 10 (2 x 0%) samples were more effectively assayed by the ISO method. According to statistical analysis, the reliability between the methods was r = 0 x 9706, r(2) = 0 x 9421 and Cronbach's alpha = 0 x 9851. While all three values showed a high degree of correlation (P < 0 x 0001) between the two methods, McNemar's test demonstrated a significant difference between them, indicating that the MUG method was more reliable than the ISO method.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that the fluorogenic method is more reliable and shorter to perform than the standard ISO method.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

Comparison of the two methods may provide a rapid and more reliable alternative for the enumeration of E. coli in food samples.

Effects of wearing knitted or rubber gloves on the transfer of Escherichia cohi between hands and meat

On eight occasions, five volunteers each handled five pieces of meat with bare hands or while wearing dry or wet knitted gloves or rubber gloves after hands had been inoculated with Escherichia coli or after handling a piece of meat inoculated with E. coli. On each occasion, after all meat was handled, each piece of meat, glove, and hand were sampled to recover E. coli. When hands were inoculated, E. coli was recovered from all meat handled with bare hands, in lesser numbers from some pieces handled with knitted gloves, and from only one piece handled with rubber gloves. When pieces of inoculated meat were handled, the numbers of E. coli transferred to uninoculated meat from bare hands or rubber gloves decreased substantially with each successive piece of uninoculated meat, but decreases were small with knitted gloves. The findings indicate that, compared with bare hands, the use of knitted gloves could reduce the transfer of bacteria from hands to meat but could increase the transfer of bacteria between meat pieces, whereas the use of rubber gloves could largely prevent the first and greatly reduce the second type of bacteria transfer.

Microbiological sampling of meat cuts and manufacturing beef by excision or swabbing

Groups of 25 beef or pork loin primal cuts or of pieces of stored or not stored manufacturing beef were sampled by excision and by swabbing with cotton wool, sponge, and gauze. Total aerobic counts, coliforms, and Escherichia coli from each sample were enumerated. Values for the mean log10, log10 mean, and/or the log10 total numbers recovered were calculated for each set of 25 bacterial counts. Those statistics indicated that, for product sampled without storage, swabbing with cotton wool or sponge recovered about 30%, and swabbing with gauze recovered about 10% of the bacteria recovered by excision sampling; but that for product sampled after storage, swabbing with cotton wool or sponge recovered about 50% and swabbing with gauze recovered about 15% of the bacteria recovered by excision sampling. However, the incidences of samples positive for coliforms and E. coli were less for stored than for nonstored product with all methods of sampling. The findings indicate that the conditions of meat surfaces, the handling of product, and the state of the microflora might all affect the numbers of bacteria recovered by any sampling technique. Thus, the relationship between the numbers recovered by excision or any selected swabbing technique may differ for different types of noncomminuted, raw meat product.

Effects of hot water pasteurizing treatments on the microbiological condition of manufacturing beef used for hamburger patty manufacture

Ten 12-kg lots of manufacturing beef from a single packing plant were obtained from a hamburger patty manufacturing plant. Each lot was divided into two, 6-kg portions, one of which was not treated while the other was treated with water of 85 degrees C. A portion from one lot was treated for 15 s. A portion from each of three lots was treated for 30 s, three portions were treated for 45 s, and three were treated for 60 s. Twenty-five pieces of meat from each portion were swabbed over areas of 100 cm2. Subsequently, each portion was first coarsely ground then finely ground, with twenty-five 100-g samples being taken from each portion at each stage of grinding. Each swab and sample of ground meat was separately processed for the enumeration of total aerobic counts, coliforms and Escherichia coli at levels of detection of 1 cfu/cm2, 1 cfu/100 cm2 and 1 cfu/100 cm2, respectively, for swab samples; and at a level of detection of 1 cfu/g for all three types of bacteria in samples of ground beef. A 250-kg batch of manufacturing beef was treated with water of 85 degrees C for 60 s. The product was processed through commercial equipment for manufacturing frozen hamburger patties. The flavour of patties prepared from the pasteurized product was compared with the flavour of patties prepared during normal commercial operation of the equipment. The weight of the manufacturing beef was not affected by the treatments. Similar total numbers of coliforms or E. coli were recovered per 2500 cm2 from the 25 swab samples or per 25 g from the 25 ground beef samples from each untreated portion. As the ratio of the surface area in cm2 to the weight in g would likely be < or = 1, the similar numbers indicated that swab sampling was inefficient for recovering coliforms and E. coli from the meat. However, coliforms and E. coli were recovered more frequently from swab than from ground beef samples from treated portions. Thus, some swabs from all three portions of beef treated for 30 s yielded coliforms and E. coli, but samples from portions treated for 45 or 60 s yielded few coliforms and no E. coli. The numbers recovered from the treated and untreated portions indicated that treatments for 45 or 60 s reduced both coliform and E. coli numbers by two orders of magnitude. The flavours of cooked patties prepared from the meat pasteurized with water of 85 degrees C for 60 s were not distinguished from the normal commercial product. The data indicate that pasteurizing manufacturing beef with water of 85 degrees C for 45 s could be a practicable treatment for enhancing the microbiological safety of frozen hamburger patties.

Microbiological testing of raw, boxed beef in the context of hazard analysis critical control point at a high-line-speed abattoir

The efficacy of cold storage of raw, bagged, boxed beef was assessed microbiologically at a high-line-speed abattoir (270 carcasses per h). At the time of this study, plant management was in the process of creating a hazard analysis critical control point plan for all processes. Aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and type 1 Escherichia coli were enumerated (5 by 5-cm excision samples, hydrophobic grid membrane filter technology) before and after cold storage of this final product produced at six fabrication tables. In addition, the temperature-function integration technique (TFIT) was used to calculate the potential number of generations of E. coli during the first 24 or 48 h of storage of the boxed beef. Based on the temperature histories (total of 60 boxes, resulting from 12 product cuts, five boxes from each of two fabrication tables on each of 6 sampling days, and six types of fabrication tables), TFIT did not predict any growth of E. coli (with or without lag) for the test period. This was verified by E. coli mean log10 values of 0.65 to 0.42 cm2 (P > 0.05) determined by culture before and after the cooling process, respectively. Counts of aerobic bacteria and coliforms were significantly reduced (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively) during the initial period of the cooling process. There were significant microbiological differences (P < 0.05) between table-cut units.

Effect of antemortem feeding regimes on bacterial numbers in the stomachs and ceca of pigs

Three groups, each of 45 pigs, were either not fasted, fasted for 15 h during lairage at the abattoir, or fasted for 15 h before dispatch from the piggery to the abattoir. Three subgroups, each of 15 pigs from each group, were held at the abattoir for additional times of either 0 to 1 h, 2 to 3 h, or 4 to 5 h. Immediately after slaughter, stomach and cecal contents were collected for pH measurement and enumeration of coliforms, Escherichia coli biotype 1 and lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Stomach pH changed from 4.1 to 3.1 as additional abattoir holding time increased from 0 to 1 h to 4 to 5 h but was unaffected by feed withdrawal (mean pH, 3.5). Cecal pH (range 6.4 to 7.2) increased in response to both treatments. Coliform and E. coli biotype 1 numbers in the stomach, means 4.6 and 4.5 log CFU/g, respectively, were not affected by feed withdrawal but decreased 0.8 log units as additional abattoir holding time increased from 0 to 1 to 4 to 5 h. LAB in the stomach decreased in response to both feed withdrawal and holding at the abattoir. Cecal numbers of coliforms and E. coli biotype 1 increased 0.8 and 1.0 log units to 7.8 and 7.6 log CFU/g, respectively, as a result of feed withdrawal, and 0.6 log units to 7.6 and 7.5 log CFU/g, respectively, as additional abattoir holding time increased to 4 to 5 h. The LAB in the cecum (mean 9.4 log CFU/g) increased slightly with increasing abattoir holding time. In the event of release of stomach or cecal contents onto the meat during carcass dressing, larger numbers of E. coli per g would be released from the ceca and fewer per g from the stomachs of pigs that have had feed withdrawn as compared to pigs not subjected to feed withdrawal.

Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing

Groups of 25 carcasses were obtained by random selection of carcasses at the end of each of eight commercial processes for the dressing or cooling of carcasses. Samples were collected from six groups of pig or beef carcasses by excision or swabbing with sponge, gauze, or cotton wool, with one sample obtained by each of the four methods from a separate, randomly selected site on each carcass. Total aerobic counts, coliforms, and Escherichia coli from each sample were enumerated. Values for the mean log10, log10 mean, and log10 total numbers recovered were calculated for each set of total aerobic counts. Those statistics indicated that the numbers of bacteria recovered by excision or swabbing with sponge or gauze were similar, while the numbers recovered by swabbing with cotton wool were at the lower end of or below the range of the numbers recovered by the other methods. The numbers of coliforms or E. coli recovered from carcasses by sampling areas up to 100 cm2 were too few for the estimation of log mean numbers. Sampling of two groups of carcasses by swabbing with gauze indicated that each 10-fold increase in the area sampled, from 10 to 1,000 cm2, approximately doubled the number of samples from which coliforms or E. coli were recovered. Sampling of six groups of carcasses from one process indicated that the sizes of swabs and volumes of diluent used for processing swabs did not have to be increased proportionally to the area of carcass surface sampled to recover numbers of E. coli proportional to the sampled area. It therefore appears that carcass sampling techniques can be varied widely without compromising the recovery of bacteria, and that the relative efficiencies with which bacteria are recovered by different techniques can be assessed by sampling each carcass in a group of 25 by each of the methods to be compared.

Assessment of the adequacy of cleaning of equipment used for breaking beef carcasses

Enumeration of bacteria on product entering or leaving a beef carcass breaking process showed that the meat was being contaminated with Escherichia coli during the process. The equipment used in the process appeared to be well cleaned, and few bacteria were recovered from meat-contacting surfaces of cleaned equipment. However, careful inspection of the cleaned equipment revealed obscured locations in the equipment which harboured detritus that carried large numbers of aerobic bacteria including E. coli. The findings indicated that when the equipment was operated with wetting of the meat-contacting surfaces, bacteria from the persisting detritus were transferred to the meat-contacting surfaces and the meat. Similar increases in the numbers of E. coli on product as a result of the carcass breaking processes were observed at two of three other plants where the processes were examined. It therefore appears that compliance with current regulatory agency recommendations for conducting and monitoring the cleaning of carcass breaking equipment will not assure the control of hazardous microbiological contamination from carcass breaking equipment. Consequently, it is suggested that the adequacy or otherwise of each cleaning process should be assessed by reference to the mean numbers of suitable indicator organisms on product entering and leaving the production process that employs the cleaned equipment.

Microbial contamination of meat during the skinning of beef carcass hindquarters at three slaughtering plants

The microbiological effects on the product of the series of operations for skinning the hindquarters of beef carcasses at three packing plants were assessed. Samples were obtained at each plant from randomly selected carcasses, by swabbing specified sites related to opening cuts, rump skinning or flank skinning operations, randomly selected sites along the lines of the opening cuts, or randomly selected sites on the skinned hindquarters of carcasses. A set of 25 samples of each type was collected at each plant, with the collection of a single sample from each selected carcass. Aerobic counts, coliforms and Escherichia coli were enumerated in each sample, and a log mean value was estimated for each set of 25 counts on the assumption of a log normal distribution of the counts. The data indicated that the hindquarters skinning operations at plant A were hygienically inferior to those at the other two plants, with mean numbers of coliforms and E. coli being about two orders of magnitude greater, and aerobic counts being an order of magnitude greater on the skinned hindquarters of carcasses from plant A than on those from plants B or C. The data further indicated that the operation for cutting open the skin at plant C was hygienically superior to the equivalent operation at plant B, but that the operations for skinning the rump and flank at plant B were hygienically superior to the equivalent operations at plant C. The findings suggest that objective assessment of the microbiological effects on carcasses of beef carcass dressing processes will be required to ensure that Hazard Analysis: Critical Control Point and Quality Management Systems are operated to control the microbiological condition of carcasses.

Assessment of the hygienic performances of an air-cooling process for lamb carcasses and a spray-cooling process for pig carcasses

The air-cooling process for carcasses at a lamb slaughtering plant and the blast-plus-spray-cooling process for carcasses at a pig slaughtering plant were examined. Temperature histories were collected from the deep leg, the aitch bone pocket surface and randomly selected surface sites of carcasses passing through each process. For each process, sets of 25 temperature histories were collected for each type of site, with a single history being collected from each of 75 randomly selected carcasses. A swab sample was obtained from a randomly selected site on each of 25 randomly selected carcasses entering and 25 leaving each process. Total aerobic counts, coliforms and Escherichia coli were enumerated in each sample. Lamb carcasses resided in the chiller for between 17.5 and 66.8 h, and pig carcasses for between 14.8 and 24.5 h. All the lamb carcasses attained deep leg and aitch bone pocket surface temperatures < 7 degrees C as did most pig carcasses. However, those temperatures remained > 13 degrees C in 8% of pig carcasses. Such inadequate cooling of pig carcasses was not apparent in temperature histories from randomly selected surface sites as such sites on both pig and lamb carcasses all attained temperatures < 7 degrees C. Proliferation values for E. coli and psychotrophic pseudomonads calculated for the temperature history from each randomly selected surface site indicated that growth of E. coli on either lamb or pig carcasses would be undetectable, but that increases in the log numbers of total aerobic counts of > 1 and < 1 during the cooling processes could be expected for lamb and pig carcasses respectively. Enumerations of bacteria showed that bacteria on pig carcasses behaved much as would be expected from the temperature histories from randomly selected sites. However, on lamb carcasses the log numbers of bacteria were reduced by about 0.5, 1.5 and 2 for total aerobic counts, coliforms, and E. coli, respectively. The findings indicate that microbiological data are required to properly assess the microbiological effects of carcass cooling processes because, in some, factors other than temperature determine the behavior of the microflora.

Assessment of the hygienic performances of hamburger patty production processes

The hygienic conditions of the hamburger patties collected from three patty manufacturing plants and six retail outlets were examined. At each manufacturing plant a sample from newly formed, chilled patties and one from frozen patties were collected from each of 25 batches of patties selected at random. At three, two or one retail outlet, respectively, 25 samples from frozen, chilled or both frozen and chilled patties were collected at random. Each sample consisted of 30 g of meat obtained from five or six patties. Total aerobic, coliform and Escherichia coli counts per gram were enumerated for each sample. The mean log (x) and standard deviation (s) were calculated for the log10 values for each set of 25 counts, on the assumption that the distribution of counts approximated the log normal. A value for the log10 of the arithmetic mean (log A) was calculated for each set from the values of x and s. A chi2 statistic was calculated for each set as a test of the assumption of the log normal distribution. The chi2 statistic was calculable for 32 of the 39 sets. Four of the sets gave chi2 values indicative of gross deviation from log normality. On inspection of those sets, distributions obviously differing from the log normal were apparent in two. Log A values for total, coliform and E. coli counts for chilled patties from manufacturing plants ranged from 4.4 to 5.1, 1.7 to 2.3 and 0.9 to 1.5, respectively. Log A values for frozen patties from manufacturing plants were between < 0.1 and 0.5 log10 units less than the equivalent values for chilled patties. Log A values for total, coliform and E. coli counts for frozen patties on retail sale ranged from 3.8 to 8.5, < 0.5 to 3.6 and < 0 to 1.9, respectively. The equivalent ranges for chilled patties on retail sale were 4.8 to 8.5, 1.8 to 3.7 and 1.4 to 2.7, respectively. The findings indicate that the general hygienic condition of hamburgers patties could be improved by their being manufactured from only manufacturing beef of superior hygienic quality, and by the better management of chilled patties at retail outlets.

Use of total of Escherichia coli counts to assess the hygienic characteristics of a beef carcass dressing process

Swab samples were obtained from 3 sites on the surfaces of beef carcasses passing through a high speed dressing process, with 24 samples from each site being obtained at each of 4 points in the process. The aerobic microflora recovered from each swab after incubation at 25 degrees C was enumerated and characterized, and numbers of coliforms and Escherichia coli were determined. The data on aerobic flora indicated that skinning results in similar contamination of all 3 sites, that further deposition of bacteria at the brisket site occurs after skinning, and that trimming and washing achieve modest decontamination of the neck and brisket site, and extensive decontamination of the rump site. Changes in flora compositions during processing were too limited to much affect the assessment based on the aerobic flora total counts alone. The E. coli data indicated that during skinning the rump site was more heavily contaminated with faecal organisms than the other sites, that contamination of the brisket site is little altered between skinning and carcass splitting, although there is an extensive redistribution of E. coli at the neck site and sporadic, limited decontamination of the rump site, and that trimming and washing do not decontaminate the neck or rump sites, but that the rump site is extensively decontaminated by trimming. There was good correlation between E. coli and coliform counts, but weak correlation between E. coli and aerobic, 25 degrees C, counts. The findings suggest that assessments of beef carcass dressing processes for Hazard Analysis: Critical Control Point (HACCP) purposes should be based on enumerations of E. coli, or perhaps coliforms, rather than of the aerobic flora, to avoid important misunderstandings of the hygienic effects of the various operations in a process.

Changes in the microflora on commercial beef trimmings during their collection, distribution and preparation for retail sale as ground beef

A commercial process for ground meat production, from the collection of meat plant trimmings to the retailing of consumer packs of ground beef, was examined. The selected process compiled with current concepts of Good Manufacturing Practice. During storage for up to 18 days before grinding, most trimming developed a flora of lactobacilli, of up to 10(7) CFU/g. Numbers of coliforms and of Escherichia coli on stored trimmings increased little and not at all, respectively. Increased total counts, and numbers of both coliforms and E. coli in displayed product indicated loss of control of the temperature of the displayed packaged product. It appears that the need to store a product, taking into account the unpredictable fluctuations in supply and demand, will inevitably result in much ground beef carrying large numbers of spoilage bacteria. Furthermore, currently accepted Good Practice in the retail handling of ground beef does not adequately control either spoilage or the growth of pathogenic bacteria.

Evaluation of the MPN, Anderson-Baird-Parker, Petrifilm E. coli and Fluorocult ECD method for enumeration of Escherichia coli in foods of animal origin

Commercially available beta-D-glucuronidase (GUR) based methods, Petrifilm E. coli (PEC) and Fluorocult ECD (FECD), and ISO standard MPN and Anderson-Baird-Parker (ABP) procedures were evaluated for routine enumeration of E. coli in naturally contaminated foods of animal origin. The methods concerned were classifiable in a sequence of best qualities for: production, MPN > ABP = PEC = FECD; costs, FECD > ABP = PEC > MPN; time per measurement, ABP = PEC = FECD > MPN; practical use, PEC > FECD > ABP > MPN; detection at low contamination, MPN > ABP = PEC > FECD. The ABP and PEC method appeared useful for routine counting of E. coli in raw meat, poultry and meat products, whereas the MPN procedure turned out to be more sensitive, however, impractical and considerably more expensive. The FECD method was inexpensive although suitable for the enumeration of E. coli at higher contamination level (> 50 cfu/g). The indole and MUG indicators both applied to demonstrate E. coli with the ABP or FECD method proved to be equal in specificity.