Coronally advanced flap and connective tissue graft with or without plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) in treatment of gingival recession

Evaluation of advanced platelet-rich fibrin compared to subepithelial connective tissue graft in the surgical management of interdental papilla recession: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

The current study aims to compare advanced-platelet-rich fibrin membrane (A-PRF) to connective tissue graft (CTG) using Han and Takei's approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The defective papilla was randomly allocated to either the control group (CTG) or to the experimental group (A-PRF). Papilla height (PH) and percent change in the gingival black triangle (GBT) area were recorded at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-two deficient IDPs with an initial papilla presence index (PPI) of 2 or 3 were included. At 12 months, the papilla-fill significantly increased in both groups (p < 0.001) without a significant difference between the study groups (p = 0.637). A mean gain in IDP height of 2.25 mm (± 0.97) in the CTG group and 1.86 mm (± 0.7) in the A-PRF group were recorded with a nonsignificant difference. Gingival black triangle fill showed a 57.98% fill in the CTG and 54.65% fill in the A-PRF group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (0.956). Regarding postoperative pain patients, the CTG group consumed significantly more analgesics than the A-PRF group (11.75 ± 3.51 and 8 ± 3.08, respectively, with p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Both CTG and A-PRF were found to be equally effective in increasing deficient IDP height with Han and Takei's surgical technique, with no significant difference. Within the current study's limitations, A-PRF seems to be a viable alternative to CTG in the treatment of GBTs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Multilayered A-PRF membrane can be used as a choice in the augmentation of receded papillae, using Han and Takei's technique.

Predictable Treatment of Gingival Recession Using Titanium Prepared Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Combination with Coronally Advanced Flap

Treatment for receding gums is always a challenging task for a periodontist. To fulfill this, many surgical techniques such as free gingival grafts, connective tissue grafts, pedicle flaps, and lateral sliding flaps have been used. For better prevention of relapse of these procedures and to improve the gingival biotype, various biomaterials such as platelet-rich fibrin, collagen matrix, and amnion chorion membranes have been additionally utilized. Due to advancements in preparation of platelet concentrates titanium platelet-rich fibrin, a third-generation platelet concentrate was introduced. Unlike other biomaterials, it has thicker fibrin meshwork with greater cellular entrapment and thicker membrane. Present case reports depict the usage of titanium platelet-rich fibrin as a biomaterial along with coronally advanced flap in the treatment of millers Class-I gingival recessions. Patients were followed up to 6 months after performing recession coverage treatments.

Clinical evaluation of the treatment of multiple gingival recessions with connective tissue graft or concentrated growth factor using tunnel technique: a randomized controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of the combination of tunnel technique (TT) and concentrated growth factor (CGF) for root coverage in treating multiple gingival recessions (GR) and compare with the connective tissue graft (CTG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients with Miller Class I and II maxillary or mandibular GR were randomly divided into two groups as follows: TT + CTG and TT + CGF. The results at baseline and 6 months were evaluated for the following clinical parameters: complete root coverage (CRC), mean root coverage (MRC), gingival thickness (GT), gingival recession width (RW), gingival recession depth (RD), and keratinized tissue width (KTW).

RESULTS

At 6 months, a statistically significant difference was found in RD, RW, MRC, CRC, KTW, and GT compared with the baseline (p < 0.05). MRC was determined 89.52±16.36% in the TT + CTG and 76.60±24.10% in the TT + CGF (p < 0.05). CRC was achieved in 66.7% of the TT + CTG and 47.4% of the TT + CGF (p < 0.05). The increase in KTW and GT was significantly better in the TT + CTG group compared to the TT + CGF (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that TT + CGF did not improve the results as much as TT + CTG in the treatment of Miller Class I and II GR. However, this finding is not sufficient to advocate the true clinical effects of CGF on GR treatment with TT.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

CGF could not serve as a direct alternative biomaterial to the gold standard CTG.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identification Number: NCT04561947.

Efficacy of Application of Plasma Rich in Growth Factors Along with the Tunnel Technique for Treatment of Gingival Recession: a Clinical Trial

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

The tunnel technique has shown promising results in treatment of gingival recession. Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) is considered effective for soft tissue regeneration since it is a rich source of growth factors.

PURPOSE

This clinical trial aimed to assess the efficacy of PRGF along with the tunnel technique and connective tissue graft for treatment of gingival recession.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

In this controlled clinical trial, 20 areas around anterior and posterior teeth in 3 patients with gingival recession were bilaterally selected. The tunnel technique was used with and without PRGF in the test and control groups, respectively (10 areas in each group). The keratinized gingival width (KGW), clinical attachment level (CAL), clinical probing depth (PD), cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to mucogingival junction (MGJ) distance, and the esthetic visual analog scale (EVAS) score were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 3 months, postoperatively. The gingival recession width (RW) and vertical recession depth (VRD) were assessed preoperatively and at 2 weeks and 3 months, postoperatively. The pain visual analog scale (PVAS) score was measured at 1, 3 and 7 days, post-treatment and the healing index (HI) was measured at 1, 3 and 7 days and 1 month, postoperatively. The root coverage percentage was assessed during 3 months. Paired t-test and repeated measures ANOVA were used for statistical analyses. p Value< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Significant improvements were noted in all tested parameters in both groups (p< 0.05). The mean root coverage percentage after 6 months was 88.68%±20.69% and 78.77%±24.94% in the test and control groups, respectively. None of the tested parameters were significantly different between two groups (p> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of gingival recession with the tunnel technique can yield favorable clinical outcome, irrespective of the employment of PRGF.