Management of ventricular tachycardia storm in patients with structural heart disease

Management of ventricular tachycardia in patients with advanced heart failure

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are highly prevalent in patients with advanced heart failure (AHF), a condition characterized by severe signs and symptoms despite conventional HF therapy. The management of VAs in this setting remains challenging. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy options are limited and only amiodarone has demonstrated effectiveness in suppressing VA, albeit this agent is associated with a substantial risk of cardiac and noncardiac adverse effects. Catheter ablation is effective for the reduction of VAs in patients with AHF. Identification of patients at high risk for periprocedural hemodynamic decompensation has important implications in terms of procedural planning and improving patient safety and procedural outcomes. Herein, we review the current state of scientific evidence for the management of VA in patients with AHF.

Clinical neurocardiology: defining the value of neuroscience-based cardiovascular therapeutics - 2024 update

The intricate role of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in regulating cardiac physiology has long been recognized. Aberrant function of the ANS is central to the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases. It stands to reason, therefore, that neuroscience-based cardiovascular therapeutics hold great promise in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases in humans. A decade after the inaugural edition, this White Paper reviews the current state of understanding of human cardiac neuroanatomy, neurophysiology and pathophysiology in specific disease conditions, autonomic testing, risk stratification, and neuromodulatory strategies to mitigate the progression of cardiovascular diseases.

Efficacy of early use of percutaneous stellate ganglion block for electrical storms

AIMS

Electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening condition requiring a rapid management. Percutaneous stellate ganglion block (PSGB) is proved to be safe and effective on top of standard therapy, but no data are available about its early use.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We considered all patients enrolled from 1 July 2017 to 30 April 2024 in the STAR registry (STellate ganglion block for Arrhythmic stoRm), a multicentre, international, observational, prospective registry. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the first PSGB only. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they received PSGB before [early PSGB, often due to antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) contraindication] or after (delayed PSGB) intravenous AADs (AADs other than beta-blockers). We considered 180 PSGB (26 early PSGB and 154 AAD first). In the early PSGB group, we observed a statistically significant reduction of treated arrhythmic events in the hour after PSGB compared with the hour before: 0 (0-0) vs. 4.5 (1-10), P < 0.001, and the extent of the reduction was similar in the early PSGB and delayed PSGB groups [-4.5 (-7 to -2) vs. -2.5 (-3.5 to -1.5), P = ns]. The percentage of patients free from arrhythmias was similar in the two groups up to 12 h after PSGB (81 vs. 84%, P = 0.6, after 1 h; 77 vs. 79%, P = 0.8, at 3 h; and 65 vs. 69%, P = 0.7, after 12 h).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous stellate ganglion block is proved to be effective also when used early in the treatment of ES. Due to its rapidity of action, our results may suggest its early use to reduce the number of defibrillations and possibly to reduce the likelihood of a refractory ES.

Impact of Catheter Ablation of Electrical Storm on Survival: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening condition, associated with substantial early and subacute mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established therapy for ES. However, data regarding the impact of CA on the short-term and midterm survival of patients admitted for ES remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This multicenter study aimed to investigate the impact of CA of ES on survival outcomes, while accounting for key patient characteristics associated with treatment selection.

METHODS

A propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was performed on 780 consecutive patients admitted for ES in 4 tertiary centers. PSM (1:1) based on the main characteristics associated with the use of CA or medical therapy alone was performed, resulting in 2 groups of 288 patients.

RESULTS

After PSM, patients who underwent CA (n = 288) and those treated with medical therapy alone (n = 288) did not present any significant differences in the main demographic characteristics, ES presentation, and management. Compared with medical therapy alone, CA was associated with a significantly lower rate of ES recurrence at 1 year (5% vs 26%; P < 0.001). Similarly, CA was associated with a higher 1-year (91% vs 81%; P < 0.001) and 3-year (78% vs 71%; P = 0.017) survival after discharge. In subgroup analyses, effect of ablation therapy remained consistent in patients older than 70 years of age (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.24-0.66), with substantial efficacy in patients with a LVEF <35% (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.27-0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

In propensity-matched analyses, this large study shows that CA-based management of patients admitted for ES is associated with a reduction in mortality compared with medical treatment, particularly in patients with a low ejection fraction.

Management of patients with an electrical storm or clustered ventricular arrhythmias: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC-endorsed by the Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, Heart Rhythm Society, and Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society

Electrical storm (ES) is a state of electrical instability, manifesting as recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) over a short period of time (three or more episodes of sustained VA within 24 h, separated by at least 5 min, requiring termination by an intervention). The clinical presentation can vary, but ES is usually a cardiac emergency. Electrical storm mainly affects patients with structural or primary electrical heart disease, often with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Management of ES requires a multi-faceted approach and the involvement of multi-disciplinary teams, but despite advanced treatment and often invasive procedures, it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. With an ageing population, longer survival of heart failure patients, and an increasing number of patients with ICD, the incidence of ES is expected to increase. This European Heart Rhythm Association clinical consensus statement focuses on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and acute and long-term management of patients presenting with ES or clustered VA.

The Mystery of Electrical Storm: A Case Report

Electrical storm is a cardiac emergency, defined as three or more hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachyarrythmias within 24 hours or ventricular tachycardia reoccurring within five minutes. The trigger for an electrical storm can be reversible like drug toxicity and electrolyte imbalances or can be irreversible like structural heart disease. Symptomatic patients can have chest pain, palpitations or syncopal episodes. We present a case of a gentleman in his 60s who was diagnosed with electrical storm which started as an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Uniqueness in the case lies in the unknown aetiology after all the investigations came back as normal and management of such cases is based on pacemakers and use of antiarrythmic agents to control and prevent further attacks.

Management of Arrhythmias in the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit

Arrhythmias in the cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) can be difficult to manage because of the complex hemodynamic and respiratory states of critically ill patients. Treating physicians must be educated to prevent, diagnose, and treat a multitude of tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias. In this review article, the authors outline a pragmatic approach to patient assessment, arrhythmia diagnosis, and management of the most common arrhythmias seen in the CVICU.

[Electrical storm in patients with Automatic Implantable Defibrillator : A single Center study]

BACKGROUND

Electrical storms (ES) are serious cardiac emergencies associated with increased short-term mortality. The true incidence of ES in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is still difficult to estimate because of the heterogeneous definition. The clinical presentation is variable and its management is multidisciplinary.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to analyze the epidemiological profile and evolution of a group of patients implanted with an ICD who had electrical storms detected by a home monitoring system.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective observational study, which included 14 patients who were implanted with ICDs, for primary or secondary prevention between 2008 and 2021. All of them were followed by home monitoring. All these patients had an ES detected by home monitoring and authenticated by ECG.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients at the time of onset of the electrical storm was 75.4 ± 14.5 years, with extremes ranging from 49 to 101 years. Most of patients (n = 11) were male. The majority of them had underlying ischaemic cardiomyopathy (n = 12). In a third of cases (n = 5) patients were implanted for secondary prevention. The electrical storm was related to recurrent episodes of VT. No cases of VF were detected. Syncope was the most frequent clinical presentation (four patients). Nine patients received internal shocks, with an average of four shocks per patient. The triggering factor was myocardial ischaemia in four cases. Majority of patients were managed in the cardiac intensive care unit. Two patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. In addition to anti-arrhythmic treatment with amiodarone and beta blockers. Nine patients underwent ablation of ventricular tachycardia focus. Mortality was high (in half of the cases) mainly due to a cardiogenic shock.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that OR remain rare, but are still associated with high mortality. Home monitoring makes it possible to manage them earlier.

Heart transplantation as a rescue strategy for patients with refractory electrical storm

AIMS

Heart transplantation (HT) can be proposed as a therapeutic strategy for patients with severe refractory electrical storm (ES). Data in the literature are scarce and based on case reports. We aimed at determining the characteristics and survival of patients transplanted for refractory ES.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients registered on HT waiting list during the following days after ES and eventually transplanted, from 2010 to 2021, were retrospectively included in 11 French centres. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Forty-five patients were included [82% men; 55.0 (47.8-59.3) years old; 42.2% and 26.7% non-ischaemic dilated or ischaemic cardiomyopathies, respectively]. Among them, 42 (93.3%) received amiodarone, 29 received (64.4%) beta blockers, 19 (42.2%) required deep sedation, 22 had (48.9%) mechanical circulatory support, and 9 (20.0%) had radiofrequency catheter ablation. Twenty-two patients (62%) were in cardiogenic shock. Inscription on wait list and transplantation occurred 3.0 (1.0-5.0) days and 9.0 (4.0-14.0) days after ES onset, respectively. After transplantation, 20 patients (44.4%) needed immediate haemodynamic support by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). In-hospital mortality rate was 28.9%. Predictors of in-hospital mortality were serum creatinine/urea levels, need for immediate post-operative ECMO support, post-operative complications, and surgical re-interventions. One-year survival was 68.9%.

CONCLUSION

Electrical storm is a rare indication of HT but may be lifesaving in those patients presenting intractable arrhythmias despite usual care. Most patients can be safely discharged from hospital, although post-operative mortality remains substantial in this context of emergency transplantation. Larger studies are warranted to precisely determine those patients at higher risk of in-hospital mortality.

Contemporary management of ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure

Enhanced ventricular arrhythmogenesis is commonly experienced by patients in the end-stage of heart failure spectrum. A high burden of ventricular arrhythmias can affect the ventricular systolic function, lead to unexpected hospitalizations and further deteriorate the prognosis. Management of ventricular arrhythmias in this population is challenging. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are protective for the immediate termination of life-threatening arrhythmias but they have no impact in reducing the arrhythmic burden. Combination treatment with invasive (catheter ablation, mechanical hemodynamic support, sympathetic denervation) and noninvasive (antiarrhythmic drugs, medical therapy for heart failure, programming of implantable devices) therapies is commonly required. The aim of this review is to present the available therapeutic options, with main focus on recently published data for catheter ablation and provide a stepwise treatment approach.

Quelling the Storm: A Review of the Management of Electrical Storm

Heightened sympathetic input to the myocardium potentiates cardiac electrical instability and may herald an electrical storm. An electrical storm is characterized by 3 or more episodes of ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or appropriate internal cardiac defibrillator shocks within 24 hours. Management of electrical storms is resource-intensive and inevitably requires careful coordination between multiple subspecialties. Anesthesiologists have an important role in acute, subacute, and long-term management. Identifying the phase of an electrical storm and understanding the characteristics of each morphology may help the anesthesiologist anticipate the management approach. In the acute phase, management of an electrical storm is aimed at providing advanced cardiac life support and identifying reversible causes. After initial stabilization, subacute management focuses on dampening the sympathetic surge with sedation, thoracic epidural, or stellate ganglion blockade. Definitive long-term management with surgical sympathectomy or catheter ablation also may be warranted. Our objective is to provide an overview of electrical storms and the anesthesiologist's role in management.

Electrical storm management in structural heart disease

Electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening condition characterized by at least three separate episodes of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) over 24 h, each requiring therapeutic intervention, including implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies. Patients with ICDs in secondary prevention are at higher risk of ES and the most common presentation is that of scar-related monomorphic VAs. Electrical storm represents a major unfavourable prognostic marker in the history of patients with structural heart disease, with an associated two- to five-fold increase in mortality, heart transplant, and heart failure hospitalization. Early recognition and prompt treatment are crucial to improve the outcome. Yet, ES management is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach and well-defined protocols and networks to guarantee a proper patient care. Acute phase stabilization should include a comprehensive clinical assessment, resuscitation and sedation management skills, ICD reprogramming, and acute sympathetic modulation, while the sub-acute/chronic phase requires a comprehensive heart team evaluation to define the better treatment option according to the haemodynamic and overall patient's condition and the type of VAs. Advanced anti-arrhythmic strategies, not mutually exclusive, include invasive ablation, cardiac sympathetic denervation, and, for very selected cases, stereotactic ablation. Each of these aspects, as well as the new European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommendations, will be discussed in the present review.

Computer-aided detection of arrhythmogenic sites in post-ischemic ventricular tachycardia

Nowadays, catheter-based ablation in patients with post-ischemic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is performed in arrhythmogenic sites identified by electrophysiologists by visual inspection during electroanatomic mapping. This work aims to present the development of machine learning tools aiming at supporting clinicians in the identification of arrhythmogenic sites by exploiting innovative features that belong to different domains. This study included 1584 bipolar electrograms from nine patients affected by post-ischemic VT. Different features were extracted in the time, time scale, frequency, and spatial domains and used to train different supervised classifiers. Classification results showed high performance, revealing robustness across the different classifiers in terms of accuracy, true positive, and false positive rates. The combination of multi-domain features with the ensemble tree is the most effective solution, exhibiting accuracies above 93% in the 10-time 10-fold cross-validation and 84% in the leave-one-subject-out validation. Results confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed features and their potential use in a computer-aided system for the detection of arrhythmogenic sites. This work demonstrates for the first time the usefulness of supervised machine learning for the detection of arrhythmogenic sites in post-ischemic VT patients, thus enabling the development of computer-aided systems to reduce operator dependence and errors, thereby possibly improving clinical outcomes.

Management of hemodynamically stable wide QRS complex tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Management of hemodynamically stable, incessant wide QRS complex tachycardia (WCT) in patients who already have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is challenging. First-line treatment is performed by medical staff who have no knowledge on programmed ICD therapy settings and there is always some concern for unexpected ICD shock. In these patients, a structured approach is necessary from presentation to therapy. The present review provides a systematic approach in four distinct phases to guide any physician involved in the management of these patients: PHASE I: assessment of hemodynamic status and use of the magnet to temporarily suspend ICD therapies, especially shocks; identification of possible arrhythmia triggers; risk stratification in case of electrical storm (ES).

PHASE II

The preparation phase includes reversal of potential arrhythmia "triggers", mild patient sedation, and patient monitoring for therapy delivery. Based on resource availability and competences, the most adequate therapeutic approach is chosen. This choice depends on whether a device specialist is readily available or not. In the case of ES in a "high-risk" patient an accelerated patient management protocol is advocated, which considers urgent ventricular tachycardia transcatheter ablation with or without mechanical cardiocirculatory support.

PHASE III

Therapeutic phase is based on the use of intravenous anti-arrhythmic drugs mostly indicated in this clinical context are presented. Device interrogation is very important in this phase when sustained monomorphic VT diagnosis is confirmed, then ICD ATP algorithms, based on underlying VT cycle length, are proposed. In high-risk patients with intractable ES, intensive patient management considers MCS and transcatheter ablation.

PHASE IV

The patient is hospitalized for further diagnostics and management aimed at preventing arrhythmia recurrences.

Contemporary management of ventricular electrical storm in Europe: results of a European Heart Rhythm Association Survey

Electrical storm (ES) is a predictor of mortality, and its treatment is challenging. Moreover, not all potential therapeutic strategies are available in all hospitals, and a standardized approach among European centres is lacking. The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to assess the current management of patients with ES both in the acute and post-acute phases in 102 different European centres. A 20-item online questionnaire was sent out to the EHRA Research Network Centres. The median number of patients with ES treated annually per centre is 10 (IQR 5-15). The possibility of using autonomic modulation (e.g. percutaneous stellate ganglion block or thoracic epidural anaesthesia) for the acute ES treatment is available in only 29.3% of the centres. Moreover, although over 80% of centres perform ventricular tachycardia ablation, this procedure is available 24/7 in only 16.5% of the hospitals. There is a significant heterogeneity among centres regarding the availability of AADs and their use before deciding to proceed with a non-AAD strategy; specifically, 4.4% of centres use only one drug, 33.3% use two drugs, and 12.2% >two drugs, while about 50% of the centres decide based on individual patient's characteristics. Regarding the type of AADs used for the acute and post-acute management of ES patients, important variability is reported depending upon the underlying heart disease. Most patients considered for percutaneous ablation have structural heart disease. Only 46% of centres refer patients to psychological counselling after ES.

The imperfect storm: An uncommon presentation of Chagas disease

Electrical storm is defined as three or more sustained episodes of ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or appropriate cardioverter-defibrillator shocks during a 24-h period. These patients are notoriously difficult to manage. We present a case secondary to Chagas disease that was responsive to lidocaine. Although an uncommon presentation, given the large-scale population movement from South America, Chagas has an increased incidence and is an important diagnostic consideration in patients with new onset heart failure, arrhythmia, or electrical storm.

Pharmacologic Management for Ventricular Arrhythmias: Overview of Anti-Arrhythmic Drugs

Ventricular arrhythmias (Vas) are a life-threatening condition and preventable cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD). With the increased utilization of implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD), the focus of VA management has shifted toward reduction of morbidity from VAs and ICD therapies. Anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) can be an important adjunct therapy in the treatment of recurrent VAs. In the treatment of VAs secondary to structural heart disease, amiodarone remains the most well studied and current guideline-directed pharmacologic therapy. Beta blockers also serve as an important adjunct and are a largely underutilized medication with strong evidentiary support. In patients with defined syndromes in structurally normal hearts, AADs can offer tailored therapies in prevention of SCD and improvement in quality of life. Further clinical trials are warranted to investigate the role of newer therapeutic options and for the direct comparison of established AADs.

Kearns-Sayre Syndrome With Persistent Ventricular Tachycardia Refractory to Shocks and Medications

Cardiovascular conduction delay makes up part of the triad associated with Kearns-Sayre syndrome (KSS). Although there have been a few reported cases of prolonged Qtc and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia associated with this disease, despite the use of automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators (AICD) for secondary prevention, some cases have been reported where the use of AICD did not help. We present a case of a 62-year-old male with KSS who came to the emergency department (ED) after two episodes of syncope. He already had an automatic AICD placed at the age of 34. Our patient had Qtc prolongation which is an unusual finding in KSS. He also had recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to medications and multiple shocks from his AICD, which progressed to a VT storm. He eventually passed away after the withdrawal of care, as his prognosis worsened. We recommend that a more clear guideline will help manage this devastating disease, resulting in mortality reduction.

Clinical management of electrical storm: a current overview

The number of patients affected by electrical storm has been continuously increasing in emergency departments. Patients are often affected by multiple comorbidities requiring multidisciplinary interventions to achieve a clinical stability. Careful reprogramming of cardiac devices, correction of electrolyte imbalance, knowledge of underlying heart disease and antiarrhythmic drugs in the acute phase play a crucial role. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of pharmacological treatment, latest transcatheter ablation techniques and advanced management of patients with electrical storm.

COVID-19 induced ventricular tachycardia storm unmasking a clinically silent cardiomyopathy: a case report

Background

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a systemic illness characterized by raging impact of cytokine storm on multiple organs. This may trigger malignant ventricular arrhythmias and unmask a clinically silent cardiomyopathy.

Case summary

A 57-year-old gentleman, known case of hyperthyroidism and diabetes, was referred to our emergency department with history of two ventricular tachycardia (VT) episodes requiring direct current cardioversion in last 3 h followed by another episode in our emergency department that was cardioverted. There was no past history of cardiac illness. His 12-lead electrocardiogram (during sinus rhythm) along with screening echocardiography suggested Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). He was coincidentally found to be COVID-19 positive by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as part of our routine screening. However, he had no fever or respiratory complaints. We noted raised systemic inflammatory markers and cardiac troponin T which progressively increased over the next 4 weeks paralleled by an increase in ventricular premature contraction burden and thereafter started decreasing and returned to baseline by 6th week when the patient became COVID-19 negative by RT-PCR. Subsequently, a single-chamber automated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation was done following which there was a transient increase in these biomarkers that subsided spontaneously. The patient is asymptomatic during 6 weeks of follow-up.

Discussion

COVID-19-associated cytokine surge triggering VT storm and unmasking a clinically silent ARVC has not yet been reported. The case highlights a life-threatening presentation of COVID-19 and indicates a probable link between inflammation and arrhythmogenicity.

Expert consensus on acute management of ventricular arrhythmias - VT network Austria

The Arrhythmia Working Group of the Austrian Society of Cardiology (ÖKG) has set the goal of systematically structuring and organizing the acute care of patients with ventricular arrhythmias (VA), i.e. ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in Austria. Within a consensus paper, national recommendations on the basic diagnostic work-up of VA (12-lead ECG, medical history, family history, laboratory analyses, echocardiography, search for reversible causes, ICD interrogation), as well as further medical treatment and therapeutic measures (indication of coronary angiography, ablation therapy) are established. Since acute ablation of VT is indicated in the current ESC guidelines as a class IB indication for scar-associated incessant VT or electrical storm (ES; ≥ 3 ICD therapies in 24 h) as well as for ischemic cardiomyopathy (iCMP) with recurrent ICD shocks, organizational measures must be taken to ensure that these guidelines can be implemented. Therefore, a VT network will be established covering all areas in Austria, consisting of primary and secondary VT centers. Organizational aspects of an acute VT network are defined and should subsequently be implemented by the participating hospitals. All electrophysiologic centers in Austria that deal with VT ablation are to be integrated into the network in the medium-term. Centers that co-operate in the network are divided into primary and secondary VT centers according to predefined criteria.

Limited Left Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy Effectively Silences Refractory Electrical Storm

BACKGROUND

Electrical Storm is a life-threatening condition that affects up to 20% of patients with ICDs. In this small retrospective study, we report our results with left video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy/ganglionectomy (VATSG) to treat refractory electrical storm in low ejection fraction patients who were not candidates for catheter ablations (CA).

METHODS

We identified 12 patients who presented with electrical storm and underwent a total of 14 video assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy/ganglionectomy, including three patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO). We reviewed demographic data, survival to discharge, number of cardioversions (before and after VATSG), need for readmissions, and need for right-sided procedures.

RESULTS

In the 30 days prior to a left VATSG the mean number of shocks was 22.67 for all patients. For the patients who survived to discharge the mean was 3.55 since surgery with a median of zero shocks after a median follow up of 358 days. Six patients have not experienced any further cardioversions since their last VATSG and five have never been readmitted for VT. Two patients had staged bilateral procedures due to recurrences and of those, one never required any further cardioversions.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited left VATSG is an appropriate and effective initial treatment for ES patients who are not candidates for CA, including patients on VA ECMO for hemodynamic support.

Management of ventricular electrical storm: a contemporary appraisal

Ventricular electrical storm (VES) is a clinical scenario characterized by the clustering of multiple episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) over a short duration. Patients with VES are prone to psychological disorders, heart failure decompensation, and increased mortality. Studies have shown that 10–28% of the patients with secondary prevention ICDs can sustain VES. The triad of a susceptible electrophysiologic substrate, triggers, and autonomic dysregulation govern the pathogenesis of VES. The rate of VA, underlying ventricular function, and the presence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) determine the clinical presentation. A multi-faceted approach is often required for management consisting of acute hemodynamic stabilization, ICD reprogramming when appropriate, antiarrhythmic drug therapy, and sedation. Some patients may be eligible for catheter ablation, and autonomic modulation with thoracic epidural anesthesia, stellate ganglion block, or cardiac sympathetic denervation. Hemodynamically unstable patients may benefit from the use of left ventricular assist devices, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Special scenarios such as idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, Brugada syndrome, Long and short QT syndrome, early repolarization syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, and cardiac sarcoidosis have been described as well. VES is a cardiac emergency that requires swift intervention. It is associated with poor short and long-term outcomes. A structured team-based management approach is paramount for the safe and effective treatment of this sick cohort.

Electrical storm: A focused review for the emergency physician

BACKGROUND

Electrical storm is a dangerous condition presenting to the Emergency Department that requires rapid diagnosis and management.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides a review of the diagnosis and management of electrical storm for the emergency clinician.

DISCUSSION

Electrical storm is defined as ≥3 episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or shocks from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator within 24 h. Patients may present with a wide array of symptoms. Initial evaluation should include an electrocardiogram with a rhythm strip and continuous cardiac monitoring, a medication history, assessment of hemodynamic stability, and identification of potential triggers. Management includes an antiarrhythmic and a beta blocker. Refractory patients may benefit from double-sequential defibrillation or more invasive procedures such as intra-aortic balloon pumps, catheter ablation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for critically ill patients. These patients will typically require admission to an intensive care unit.

CONCLUSION

Electrical storm is a condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It is important for clinicians to be aware of the current evidence regarding the evaluation and management of these patients.

Refractory Electrical Storm in the Absence of Structural Ischemic Heart Disease

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is characterized as a ventricular rhythm with a QRS >120 milliseconds (ms) and >100 beats-per-minute (BPM) in the absence of an aberrant conduction. It is classified as sustained when lasting >30 seconds. Risk factors associated with the development of VT include increasing age and coronary artery disease with concurrent left ventricular dysfunction, other forms of structural heart disease and acquired or congenital abnormalities in the cardiac sodium, potassium or calcium channels. Diagnosing VT is challenging based on history and physical exam alone. Combination of electrocardiogram (EKG), electrolytes and cardiac enzymes, echocardiogram, cardiac catheterization, and electrophysiology testing are required to appropriately diagnose and characterize the etiology. The case below describes an 84-year-old female with a known history of symptomatic bradycardia status post pacemaker who presented to the emergency department (ED) after a routine device check which revealed VT with associated dyspnea. The patient did not do well with medical therapy and required ablative therapy to resolve VT.

Outcome of rescue ablation in patients with refractory ventricular electrical storm requiring mechanical circulation support

BACKGROUND

The management of refractory electrical storm (ES) requiring mechanical circulation support (MCS) remains a clinical challenge in structural heart disease (SHD).

OBJECTIVE

The study sought to explore the 30-day and 1-year outcome of rescue ablation for refractory ES requiring MCS in SHD.

METHODS

A total of 81 patients (mean age: 55.3 ± 18.9, 73 men [90.1%]) undergoing ablation were investigated, including 26 patients with ES requiring MCS (group 1) and 55 patients without (group 2). The 30-day and 1-year outcome, including mortality and recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VAs) receiving appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillators therapies, were assessed.

RESULTS

The patients in group 1 were characterized by older age, more ischemic cardiomyopathies, worse left ventricular ejection fraction, and more comorbidities. Thirty days after ablation, overall events were seen in 15 patients (mortality in 10 and recurrent VA in 7), including pumping failure-related mortality in 6 (60%). During a 30-day follow-up, higher mortality was noted in group 1. After a 1-year follow-up, in spite of the higher mortality in group 1 (P < .001), the overall events and VA recurrences were similar between these two groups (P = .154 and P = .466, respectively). There was a significant reduction of VA burden in both groups and two patients had recurrent ES.

CONCLUSION

Higher 30-day mortality was observed in patients undergoing rescue ablation for refractory ES requiring MCS, and pumping failure was the major cause of periprocedural death. Rescue ablation successfully prevented VA recurrences and resulted in a comparable 1-year prognosis between ES with and without MCS.

Electrical Storm: Current Evidence, Clinical Implications, and Future Perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening medical emergency of repetitive episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmias within a short period. Its occurrence is associated with poor short- and long-term survival, even in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). Management of ES is challenging and mainly based on retrospective studies. This article reviews the existing literature on ES, presents the available data regarding its management, and proposes a new algorithm based on current evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent research could modify the management of ES supporting the role of non-selective β1 and β2 blockade and the early intervention with catheter ablation as well as strengthening the role of cardiac sympathetic denervation. A multipronged approach should be considered for the management of ES including identification and correction of reversible causes, ICD reprogramming, drug therapy (beta-blockers-especially non-selective ones-and other anti-arrhythmic drugs) and non-pharmacologic therapies such as catheter ablation and techniques of neuroaxial modulation. Although current data suggest early aggressive management, further research is required to clarify the optimal order and combination of therapies for the prevention of future events.

Management of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia electrical storm in structural heart disease

Electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening condition that is defined by three or more episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), or appropriate shocks from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) within 24 hours. The most common form of ES is monomorphic VT. It carries poor outcome despite all available intervention therapies. The therapies include rapid recognition of the condition, treatment of the reversible causes, ICD-reprogramming, antiarrhythmic drugs, sedation, and catheter ablation (CA). The first line antiarrhythmic drugs are amiodarone and β-blockers with superiority of propranolol over the others. The long-term use of the antiarrhythmic drugs is limited due to their adverse effects and drug-related proarrhythmic effect. The basic mechanism of monomorphic VT is re-entry pathway which can be targeted by CA. CA should be considered in drug refractory ES and patients should be referred in early course of disease. There are reported studies which showed the superiority of CA over the medical treatment in reducing the arrythmia burden and ICD appropriate shock. The survival benefit has been reported after successful ablation of ES in case series but to date no randomized control trial shows mortality benefit.

Resistant Ventricular Arrhythmia and the Role of Overdrive Pacing in the Suppression of the Electrical Storm

Ventricular arrhythmia storm is a state of cardiac instability characterized by multiple ventricular arrhythmias or multiple ICD therapies within a 24-hour duration. Management of this life-threatening state depends on the reversal of the cause besides either electrical or medical management of the arrhythmia. We report a case of a 54-year-old male who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention following massive acute myocardial infarction. Afterwards, he developed frequent life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias that required multiple shocks and antiarrhythmic medications. Despite all these interventions, it was very difficult to control the electrical instability, but after overdrive ventricular pacing, the storm subsided and within a few days the case was stabilized. Overdrive pacing is an easy temporary modality to control the resistant arrhythmia following myocardial infarction.

Update in Electrical Storm Therapy

BACKGROUND

Electrical storm (ES) is a major life-threatening event, which announces a possible negative outcome and poor prognosis and poses challenging questions concerning etiology and management.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted through MEDLINE and EMBASE (past 30 years until the end of September 2018) using the following search terms: ES, ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, ablation, and implantable defibrillator. Clinicaltrials.gov was also consulted for studies that are ongoing or completed. Additional articles were identified through bibliographical citations.

AREA OF UNCERTAINTY

There is no homogeneous attitude, and therapeutic strategies vary widely.

THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES

The aim of this review is to define the concept of ES, to review the incidence and prognostic implications, and to describe the most common strategies of therapeutic advances and trends. The management strategy should be decided after an accurate risk stratification is done in initial evaluation according to hemodynamic tolerability and presence of triggers and comorbidities. General care should be provided in an intensive cardiovascular care unit. The cornerstone of acute medical therapy used in ES is mainly represented by amiodarone and beta-blockers. Deep sedation and mechanical ventilation should provide comfort for treatment administration. First-choice drugs are benzodiazepines and short-acting analgesics. General care may also include thoracic epidural anesthesia to modulate neuroaxial efferents to the heart and to decrease sympathetic hyperactivity. We include a special focus on ablation as a reliable tool to target the mechanism of arrhythmia, finally building an up-to-date standardization.

CONCLUSIONS

ES management needs a complex assessment and interpretation of a critical situation in a life-threatening condition. Optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-reprogramming, antiarrhythmic drug therapy and sedation are in first-line approach. Catheter ablation is the elective therapy and plays a central key role in the treatment of ES if possible in combination with hemodynamic support.

Anti-arrhythmic drug therapy in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have revolutionized the primary and secondary prevention of patients with ventricular arrhythmias. However, the adverse effects of appropriate or inappropriate shocks may require the adjunctive use of anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs). Beta blockers are the cornerstone of pharmacological primary and secondary prevention of ventricular arrhythmias. In addition to their established efficacy at reducing the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias, beta-blockers are safe with few side effects. Amiodarone is superior to beta blockers and sotalol for the prevention of ventricular arrhythmia recurrence. However, long-term amiodarone use is associated with significant side effects that limit its utility. Sotalol and mexiletine are the main alternatives to amiodarone with a better side effect profile though they are less efficacious at preventing ventricular arrhythmia recurrence. Dofetilide, azimilide and ranolazine are emerging as therapeutic options for secondary prevention; more studies are needed to assess efficacy and safety in comparison to currently used agents. Beta blockers and amiodarone are the mainstay of therapy in patients experiencing electrical storm; their use reduces the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias and ICD intervention as well as affording time until catheter ablation can be considered.

Electrical storm - still an extremely poor prognosis. Do these acute states of life-threatening arrhythmias require a multidirectional approach from the start?

Electrical storm (ES) is a state of electrical instability of the heart manifesting as multiple and potentially lethal recurring ventricular arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. This definition is not related to the condition of each patient, who can present from asymptomatic to unconscious and in deep cardiogenic shock. Most patients affected by ES have heart failure (HF) of ischaemic origin. Ischaemia, exacerbation of HF, low ejection fraction, previous ventricular arrhythmias, infection or electrolyte disturbances together with other factors, or a few factors combined, may result in ES. The prognosis of ES survivors is very poor, with 1-year mortality exceeding 40%, which should draw attention to this group of patients as one of extremely high risk. The number of patients with cardioverter-defibrillators is increasing and so is the number of patients suffering from ES. Therefore, each patient should be supported with tailored therapy, and not only restricted to pharmacotherapy or ablation procedures. This paper was written to analyse the most frequent causes of ES and prompt the most appropriate clinical pathways and possibilities, underlining the need for a comprehensive invasive approach to diagnosis, treatment and circulatory stabilization in addition to adequate pharmacotherapy. This approach might help to reduce the mortality rate in this group of patients and improve the prognosis.

Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Structural Heart Disease

Ventricular tachycardia is a potentially fatal arrhythmia that occurs most frequently in patients with structural heart disease. Acute and long- term management can be complex, requiring an integrated approach with multiple therapeutic modalities including antiarrhythmic drugs, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and catheter ablation. Each of these options has a role in management of ventricular tachycardia and are generally used in combination. It is essential to be aware that each approach has potential deleterious consequences that must be balanced while establishing a treatment strategy. Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia is performed with increasing frequency with rapidly evolving techniques. In this review, we discuss the acute and long-term management of ventricular tachycardia with a focus on techniques and evidence for catheter ablation.

Unsolved Questions on the Anatomy of the Ventricular Conduction System

We reviewed the anatomical characteristics of the conduction system in the ventricles of human and ungulate hearts and then raised some questions to be answered by clinical and anatomical studies in the future. The ventricular conduction system is a 3-dimensional structure as compared to the 2-dimensional character of the atrial conduction system. The proximal part consisting of the atrioventricular node, the bundle of His and fascicles are groups of conducting cells surrounded by fibrous connective tissue so as to insulate from the underlying myocardium. Their location and morphological characters are well established. The bundle of His is a cord like structure but the left and right fascicles are broad at the proximal and branching at the distal part. The more distal part of fascicles and Purkinje system are linear networks of conducting cells at the immediate subendocardium but the intra-mural network is detected at the inner half of the ventricular wall. The papillary muscle also harbors Purkinje system not in the deeper part. It is hard to recognize histologically in human hearts but conducting cells as well as Purkinje cells are easily recognized in ungulate hearts. Further observation on human and ungulate hearts with myocardial infarct, we could find preserved Purkinje system at the subendocardium in contrast to the damaged system at the deeper myocardium. Further studies are necessary on the anatomical characteristics of this peripheral conduction system so as to correlate the clinical data on hearts with ventricular arrhythmias.