Points to consider before the insertion of maxillary implants: the otolaryngologist's perspective

A Clinical Approach for the Removal of a Large Antral Pseudocyst with Simultaneous Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Case Series

For a large benign lesion within the maxillary sinus, such as an antral pseudocyst, maxillary sinus floor augmentation is more commonly performed using a two-stage approach. This involves first removing the lesion, and then, re-entry following several months of healing. In this case series, we described the "one-bony-window" approach, which is a technical surgical modification of the previous one-stage approach, for simultaneous cyst removal and maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Four patients with large maxillary antral pseudocysts were included. The "one-bony-window" approach involves the preparation of a large window opening of approximately 15 mm × 20 mm at the lateral wall. A mesiodistally extended intentional perforation was made in the upper part of the exposed membrane to enhance the access for instrumentation. The antral pseudocyst was removed in its entirety without being deformed to prevent rupture or leakage of the cystic contents. Subsequent detachment and elevation of the Schneiderian membrane at the sinus floor significantly reduced the perforation site, and bone grafting with implant placement was performed simultaneously. This alleviated the need to surgically repair the perforation. The lateral opening was either uncovered or repositioned using bony window lids. Healing abutments were connected after six months, and the final prosthesis was placed after two months. At the 1-year follow-up, the antral pseudocysts had resolved with no specific recurrence, and the stability of the augmented sinus was maintained with excellent implant survival. Within the limitations of our findings, the "one-bony-window" technique can be suggested for the simultaneous removal of large antral pseudocysts and maxillary sinus floor augmentation with favorable clinical outcomes.

Factors Influencing Recurrence after Surgical Treatment of Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusitis: An Analysis from the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Point of View

The aim of the study was to determine the factors influencing the development of recurrence after the surgical treatment of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis in an oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic over a 7-year period. Demographic and anamnesis data, clinical and radiological findings, treatment and outcome were analyzed. A multivariable analysis was performed to find associations between patient age, causative focus, surgical access for sinus revision, multilayer closure with a buccal fat pad, inferior meatal antrostomy (IMA) for temporary sinus drainage and sinusitis recurrence. A total of 164 patients with a mean age of 51.7 years were included. Sinusitis recurrence was observed in nine patients (5.48%) within 6 months after primary surgery. No significant correlation was detected between patient age, causative focus, surgical access for sinus revision, multilayer closure with a buccal fat pad, IMA for sinus drainage and the development of recurrence (p > 0.05). Patients with a history of antiresorptive-related osteonecrosis of the jaw showed a significant tendency toward disease recurrence (p = 0.0375). In conclusion, except for antiresorptive administration, none of the investigated variables were related to a higher risk of sinusitis recurrence. We encourage a combined approach of intraoral removal of the infective focus and sinus drainage via FESS, as well as an individual treatment decision in a multidisciplinary setting with collaboration between dentistry, maxillofacial surgery and otorhinolaryngology to avoid sinusitis recurrence.

Features of Odontogenic Sinusitis Associated With Dental Implants

OBJECTIVES

With the increase in dental implants for tooth loss, odontogenic sinusitis following maxillary dental implants is frequently encountered in otorhinolaryngology practice. The authors aimed to reveal the association between implant extrusion into maxillary sinus, along with implant-related complications in patients diagnosed with implant-related odontogenic sinusitis (IR-ODS).

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study.

METHODS

This study enrolled 60 patients who received functional endoscopic sinus surgery due to IR-ODS. The preoperative sinus computed tomography was retrospectively reviewed. Among the 120 maxillary sinuses of the 60 patients, 68 sides were diagnosed with IR-ODS sides, whereas 27 sides showed no clinical or radiological evidence of this condition after the implant insertion and were defined as the control sides. Statistical analysis between these two groups was conducted, in addition to odds ratio (OR) calculations for associations with IR-ODS.

RESULTS

The mean age of the IR-ODS subjects was 59.5 ± 19.1, with a male to female ratio of 32/28 (53.3%/46.7%). Implants extruding by more than 4 mm into the maxillary sinus, peri-implantitis, bone graft disruption-extrusion were associated with a significantly higher incidence in the IR-ODS (p = 0.035, p = 0.003, p = 0.011, respectively). The IR-ODS sides showed an adjusted-OR (95% confidence interval) of 27.4 (2.7-276.5) for extrusion length >4 mm, 11.8 (3.0-46.5) for peri-implantitis, and 34.1 (3.3-347.8) for bone graft disruption (p = 0.005, p < 0.001, and p = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Maxillary dental implants extruding more than 4 mm into the maxillary sinus, peri-implantitis, and disrupted-extruded bone grafts show significant association with IR-ODS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 133:237-243, 2023.

Proposal for a Paradigm Shift in Personalized Medicine for Patients with a Maxillary Edentulous Jaw by ENT Specialist and Dentist Cooperation

With the spread of oral implant therapy, serious medical complications related to implant surgery are becoming a social problem. Although the number of complications after implant surgery in the edentulous jaw is decreasing in Japan, maxillary-sinus-related complications (MSRCs) have reached the highest number since 2012. It is essential to identify and eliminate possible predisposing risk factors for MSRCs at an early stage to prevent MSRCs. In this review article, we highlight the causal factors of postoperative complications with or without sinus augmentation for the maxillary molar region to achieve optimal treatment outcomes and reduce complications. In particular, we focus on anatomical variations that can cause the impairment of maxillary sinus drainage. Furthermore, we emphasize that the paradigm for personalized medicine for patients with a maxillary edentulous jaw by ENT specialist and dentist cooperation is shifting from the traditional assessment of maxillary sinus pathologies alone to the new assessment of anatomic variations that can cause the impairment of maxillary sinus drainage in addition to maxillary sinus pathologies.

Foreign bodies of dental iatrogenic origin displaced in the maxillary sinus - A safety and efficacy analysis of a retrospective study

Introduction:

Foreign bodies (FB) of the paranasal sinuses are an uncommon clinical entities with the maxillary sinuses being those most frequently affected. According to the literature, 60% of paranasal sinus FB are of iatrogenic origin, while 25% are of traumatic origin. This article aims to present an iatrogenic origin series of cases of FB displaced or projecting into the maxillary sinus.

Materials and Methods:

In this retrospective study, the presence of the foreign body was revealed with radiologic methods and confirmed during the operation with macroscopic or later with histopathologic examination. All cases were treated with osteoplasty with vascularised pedicled bone flap or through minimally invasive intraoral procedure.

Results:

A total of 27 patients were included in our study, 14 men and 13 women. The age range was 18–65 years with mean age of 46.14 (standard deviation = 10.35) years. Foreign body was displaced fragments of teeth in 11 patients (40.27%), complete teeth in four patients (14.81%), dental implants in five patients (18.51%), dental impression material in 2 cases (7,40%), gutta percha cone in two patients (7.40%), endodontic sealer associated with aspergillosis in two patients (7.40%), and dental burr in one patient (3.7%). The time between dental foreign body displacement and the surgical intervention for its removal was critical for the occurrence of sinusitis. All operated patients remained asymptomatic during a follow-up of at least 1 year.

Discussion:

Prompt intervention for removal of FB eliminates the risk for chronic inflammation of the affected maxillary sinus and reduces the odds for sequelae.

Assessment of maxillary sinus lifting procedure in the presence of chronic sinusitis, a retrospective comparative study

INTRODUCTION

Chronic sinusitis can be considered a relative contraindication for sinus lifting procedure. However, its specific effects on bone height, infection and healing have not been as well investigated as its incidence as a post-operative complication.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative investigation was executed to evaluate the impact of chronic sinusitis on sinus lifting procedures regarding bone height, infection, and healing scores. Pre-operative and 6-month postoperative records (CBCT or CT and panoramic radiographs) of 40 patients who underwent sinus lifting procedure with graft and implant placement were split into two sets of 20 patients each; Group A is comprised of a patient with healthy sinus, whereas Group B includes patients with chronic sinusitis (identified as the presence of thickening of Schniederian membrane ≥ 2 mm, mucosal cyst, polyp or fluid level). Records of both groups were assessed for the difference in bone height of alveolar ridge between pre-operative radiograph and after six months postoperatively, and clinical notifications at the postoperative follow-up to report the healing and infection scores.

RESULTS

Statistically, there was non-significant difference in mean bone height gain (p-value > 0.05) in comparison to control group mean bone height (8.84 ± 0.93). Also, there was non-significant variation in mean healing and infection scores.

CONCLUSION

According to the available data, chronic sinusitis presenting as a thickening in the Schneiderian membrane has no significant effect on postoperative bone height, healing, or infection score in patients undergoing sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placement. Further research is needed to better evaluate the effect of chronic sinusitis and its current status as a relative contraindication for sinus lifting procedure.

HOSPITAL INTERVENTION IN SEVERE SINUS INFECTION AFTER BONE GRAFT

This study presents the case of a patient who required antrostomy under general anesthesia to treat a sinus lift complication. The patient was a 43-year-old woman with no systemic abnormalities, who underwent maxillary sinus lift surgery associated with mineralized bovine bone graft. The Schneiderian membrane was perforated during the procedure and the rupture was treated with collagen membranes to close the wound and contain the biomaterial, preventing its dispersion. The patient developed a maxillary sinus infection seven days after the surgery. This infection was initially treated with 875 mg of amoxicillin combined with 125 mg of clavulanic acid. Although the initial infection did not worsen, the patient developed maxillary sinusitis. Thirty days after the onset of the initial infection, the patient underwent an intraoral surgery under local anesthesia to remove the biomaterial and clean the sinus cavity. Despite this procedure, maxillary ostial patency was still compromised and antrostomy was performed endoscopically in a hospital setting under general anesthesia. This procedure resolved the sinus infection. Then, 12 months after hospitalization, the patient was treated with another sinus graft surgery without postoperative complications. The treatment of sinus infections due to graft surgery may require early and active intervention with antibiotics, graft removal, and antrostomy to prevent major complications.