Potent Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers: A New Era for the Treatment of Acid-related Diseases

Extraesophageal reflux: Clinical manifestations and tools for diagnosis and treatment

Extraesophageal reflux is a complex clinical entity, classically presenting with laryngopharyngeal symptoms including chronic cough and vocal changes, but it is also implicated in conditions such as subglottic stenosis and lung injury. Diagnosis is challenging, in large part due to the oftentimes vague presenting symptoms with multiple possible etiologies, as well as limited consistency of currently available diagnostic tests. Furthermore, effective medical treatment is limited, and acid suppression therapy such as proton pump inhibitors has shown low to mixed efficacy in relieving signs and symptoms of reflux outside the esophagus. In this review, we will address laryngopharyngeal reflux and its diagnosis based on symptoms and exam findings, and diagnostic tools such as impedance monitoring and salivary pepsin testing. A summary of the use and limitations of acid-suppressing therapies for extraesophageal reflux and the rationale for targeting pepsin as a nonacid component of reflux will be presented. Finally, the current literature on the potential role of reflux in subglottic stenosis and lessons learned regarding reflux in the lung transplant surgery field in higher risk patient populations will be discussed.

Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy versus bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for patients with Helicobacter pylori infection: a meta-analysis

Introduction

This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy in comparison to bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) for patients with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.

Materials and methods

Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were searched published from establishment of database to June 1, 2024, for articles studying VA dual therapy compared to BQT for patients with H. pylori infection. Meta-analyses of eradication rates, adverse events, compliance and cost were preformed.

Results

A total of 17 studies were included for meta-analysis. Compared with BQT, VA increased the incidence of H. pylori eradication rate, with significant difference under the ITT analysis (86.9% vs. 80.4%, RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, p = 0.01) but there no significant difference under the PP analysis (90.7% vs. 86.5%, RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.99-1.08, p = 0.13). Besides, VA significantly increased compliance (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05, p < 0.01) and decreased the occurrence of total adverse events (27.0% vs. 11.5%, RR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.37-0.51, p < 0.01). Furthermore, VA has lower cost compared to BQT.

Conclusion

Our findings indicated that VA dual therapy provided a higher eradication rate, enhanced compliance, decreased adverse events, and lowered cost relative to BQT for patients with H. pylori infection.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024576738, identifier CRD42024576738 (PROSPERO).

Comparison of tegoprazan and proton pump inhibitors for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tegoprazan (TPZ), a potassium-competitive acid blocker with potent gastric acid-suppressing activity, may be a potential agent for treating Helicobacter pylori infection. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TPZ-based therapy for H. pylori eradication compared with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based therapy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted up to August 2024 using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to investigate the beneficial effects of TPZ-based therapy for H. pylori eradication. Studies that evaluated the eradication rates between the TPZ- and PPI-based therapies were included. The authors conducted a meta-analysis to calculate the eradication rate and pooled risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Seven studies involving 3200 patients were included. H. pylori eradication rates did not differ significantly between the TPZ- and PPI-based therapies based on the intention-to-treat (77.3% vs. 76.4%, p = 0.68; pooled RR = 1.01 [0.97-1.05]) and per-protocol (84.3% vs. 84.2%, p = 0.69; pooled RR = 1.01 [0.98-1.04]) analyses. Additionally, no significant difference was observed in the adverse drug events between TPZ- and PPI-based therapies (27.2% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.26; pooled RR = 0.91 [0.76-1.08]).

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori eradication and adverse drug event rates with TPZ- and PPI-based treatments were similar.

The efficacy and safety of Vonoprazan and Tegoprazan in Helicobacter pylori eradication: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB)-based therapies are emerging as promising alternatives for eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection. However, the comparative efficacy of P-CAB-based therapy versus proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-based therapy in treating H. pylori infection remains uncertain.

Objectives

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of P-CAB-based therapies, including Vonoprazan (VPZ) and Tegoprazan (TPZ), compared to PPI-based therapies for H. pylori infection. Subgroup analysis assessed the influence of drug history, experimental drug, treatment duration, combination therapies, and geographic regions on treatment outcomes.

Design

Meta-analysis.

Data sources and methods

Comprehensive searches were conducted in major databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, up to January 1, 2024. The primary outcome was the eradication rate, analyzed by intention-to-treat (ITT). Secondary outcomes included adverse events. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the χ2 test and the I 2 test. I 2 > 50% or p < 0.05 indicated significant heterogeneity.

Results

The analysis totally included 28 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 37 studies and 8818 patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection. Of these, 14 RCTs, including 20 studies and 4286 patients, compared P-CAB-based therapy with 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy (BQT). P-CAB-based therapy exhibited superior eradication rates compared to both 14-day BQT and PPI-based therapy (ITT analysis: 87.0% vs 79.8%, risk ratio (RR) = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.12, p < 0.0001; and 85.6% vs 77.8%, RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.05-1.12, p < 0.00001, respectively). This enhanced efficacy was particularly pronounced in patients with clarithromycin-resistant infections (73.7% vs 41.5%, RR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.07-2.20, p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis demonstrated higher eradication rates with P-CAB-based therapy in treatment-naïve participants, VPZ recipients, and those receiving 7- or 14-day regimens (dual, triple, or quadruple therapy). However, no significant differences were observed in treatment-experienced subgroups, TPZ recipients, or those on 10-day regimens. In addition, P-CAB-based therapy showed a lower incidence of adverse events than PPI-based treatments (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.63-0.86, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

P-CAB-based therapies are more effective than traditional PPI-based treatments for eradicating H. pylori infection, with a reduced incidence of adverse events.

PROSPERO registration

CRD42024503665.

Randomized Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan According to the Timing of Dosing in Patients With Erosive Esophagitis

Background/Aims

Fexuprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, was developed for treating acid-related disorders. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of fexuprazan, unlike those of proton pump inhibitors, are independent of food effect. This study aims to evaluate differences in efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE) according to the timing of dosing.

Methods

In this multicenter, open-label noninferiority study, patients who had typical reflux symptoms with endoscopically confirmed EE were randomized 1:1 to receive fexuprazan 40 mg daily 30 minutes before or after meal. Treatment was completed after 2 weeks or 4 weeks when healing was endoscopically confirmed. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with healed EE confirmed by endoscopy up to week 4. Safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

Results

In the prior-to-meal group (n = 89) and after-meal group (n = 86), 4-week EE healing rates were 98.77% and 100.00% (difference, 0.01%; 95% CI, -0.01% to 0.04%) and 2-week EE healing rates were 95.77% and 97.14% (difference, 0.01%; 95% CI, -0.05% to 0.07%), respectively. TEAEs were 9.78% and 8.70% in the prior-to-meal group and the after-meal group, respectively.

Conclusions

Non-inferiority analysis revealed that taking fexuprazan after meal was non-inferior to taking fexuprazan before meals in patients with EE. The frequency of adverse events was similar between the 2 study groups. The drug is safe and effective for healing EE regardless of the timing of dosing.

Safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-line treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, due to their intrinsic limitations, there are still unmet clinical needs that have fostered the development of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs). Currently, four different drugs (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, fexuprazan, and keverprazan) are marketed in some Asian countries, whereas only vonoprazan and tegoprazan are available in Western countries (USA and Brazil or Mexico, respectively).

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the current knowledge on P-CABs acute and long-term safety in GERD treatment compared to that of PPIs. Full-text articles and abstracts were searched in PubMed.

EXPERT OPINION

P-CABs proved to address some of the unmet clinical needs in GERD, with a favorable risk-benefit ratio compared to conventional PPIs. Preclinical and clinical findings have highlighted P-CAB safety to be superimposable, to that of PPIs, in short-term treatments, although further studies are warranted to monitor their effects in long-term therapy. From an epidemiological point of view, the paucity of rigorous data for many variables (e.g. age, ethnicity, drug interactions, comorbidities, genetic polymorphisms, interindividual susceptibility, and gut dysbiosis) deserves a worldwide framework of continuous pre/post-marketing pharmacovigilance programs to reduce potential confounding factors and accurately link acute and chronic P-CAB therapy to adverse outcomes.

Clinical Impact of High-dose Esomeprazole-amoxicillin Dual Therapy as Rescue Treatment for Helicobacter pylori Infection : A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) using esomeprazole and amoxicillin to furazolidone-based quadruple therapy (FBQT) in treating nonresponsive patients with Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 209 patients with H. pylori infection, who had previously received ineffective treatment and visited an outpatient clinic, were randomly assigned to either the HDDT or FBQT groups. All patients underwent a 14-day treatment regimen, and the success rates of H. pylori eradication and safety of the treatment regimens were assessed 4 weeks posttreatment.

RESULTS

Following the 14-day treatment period, the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis revealed eradication rates of 93.6% for HDDT and 86.9% for FBQT. In the per-protocol (PP) analysis, eradication rates were 94.5% for HDDT and 88.7% for FBQT. No significant difference in eradication rates was observed between the two groups. HDDT exhibited significantly lower rates of adverse reactions (9.1% in ITT and 9.2% in PP) compared with FBQT (58.6% in ITT and 59.8% in PP). Multivariate analysis identified interval time, alkaline phosphatase, and serum creatinine level as factors influencing the eradication rate. The area under the receiver operating curve of the interval time between the FBQT group and the HDDT group and the success of H. pylori eradication were 0.622 and 0.578, respectively. The optimal salvage treatment intervals were determined as 6 months for FBQT and 1 year for HDDT.

CONCLUSION

HDDT using high-dose esomeprazole and amoxicillin demonstrated efficacy in treating H. pylori infection, with the added benefits of reduced side effects and improved medication compliance compared with FBQT. HDDT can be considered a rescue treatment option when other methods fail, with treatment intervals optimized accordingly.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of zastaprazan (JP-1366), a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, in patients and healthy volunteers

Zastaprazan (JP-1366) is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker for the treatment of acid-related disorders. We aimed to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of zastaprazan, thereby characterizing the PK of zastaprazan in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as well as evaluating the impact of various covariates, including CYP2C19 phenotypes, on zastaprazan PK. This population PK analysis included zastaprazan plasma concentration-time data from 92 patients with erosive GERD and 68 healthy volunteers without any gastrointestinal disorders and was performed using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. Simulations were conducted to predict zastaprazan PK under various dosing regimens in patients with GERD. The plasma PK of zastaprazan was adequately described by a two-compartment model with Erlang-type absorption (six sequential compartments) and first-order elimination. CYP2C19 phenotypes had no significant effect on zastaprazan PK. The disease status was identified as a significant covariate on apparent clearance of zastaprazan, showing lower values in patients with GERD compared to healthy volunteers. However, the model-based simulation indicated that the impact of disease status on zastaprazan exposure was not clinically meaningful. Overall, the current population PK model successfully characterized the observed zastaprazan PK in both patients with GERD and healthy volunteers.

Impact of different gastric acid suppressants on chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced cognitive impairment in rats: A possible involvement of gut dysbiosis

Recently, clinical evidence indicates that gastric acid suppressants are associated with an increased risk of the development of cognitive impairment and dementia, especially in elderly patients and those with mild cognitive impairment. Therefore, the aim of this research was to explore the impact of different gastric acid suppressants use, famotidine (Famo), esomeprazole (Esome) and vonoprazan (Vono) in the absence or the presence of chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) on several memory tasks with examination of the role of gut dysbiosis. In the present study, rats received famotidine (3.7 mg/kg/day, p.o.) or esomeprazole (3.7 mg/kg/day, p.o.) or vonoprazan (1.85 mg/kg/day, p.o.) for 7 weeks with or without exposure to CUMS. Remarkably, CUMS with different acid suppressants caused a significant decrease in all memory tasks in late CUMS in the current investigation. CUMS with acid suppressants also revealed a marked alteration in the fecal Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio compared to CUMS alone. This gut microbiome alteration was associated with an alteration in gut membrane integrity, as revealed by colonic histopathology and an elevation of systemic inflammatory markers. Besides, upregulation of hippocampal amyloid β and p-tau proteins and modification of brain histopathology were noticed. Our findings support the detrimental effect of gastric acid suppressants, especially proton pump inhibitors, on cognitive impairment in the presence of stress, with the possible involvement of gut dysbiosis.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers and Proton Pump Inhibitors for First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Given the increasing antibiotic resistance and the inadequate acid-suppressing effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), it is crucial to continuously optimize existing Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatment regimens. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB)-based eradication regimens compared with traditional PPI-based regimens for the initial treatment of H. pylori.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis, searching seven electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating initial P-CAB-based H. pylori eradication therapy. The primary outcome was the H. pylori eradication rate. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and patient compliance. We synthesized the effect sizes of the trials using odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

A total of 54 RCTs involving 15,320 patients (74.9% male, mean age 30.2 years) were included in this study. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, VPZ-HD-dual, VPZ-triple, and VPZ-quadruple regimens demonstrated significantly higher eradication rates than PPI-triple, PPI-quadruple, and VPZ-dual regimens. Similar trends were observed in the per-protocol (PP) analysis. Subgroup analysis indicated that poor patient compliance significantly reduced eradication rates. Resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole significantly weakened the eradication effects of PPI-triple, TPZ-triple, and VPZ-triple regimens. Additionally, the eradication rates for 7-day regimens were significantly lower than those for 14-day or 10-day regimens, but there was no significant difference between the eradication rates of 10-day and 14-day regimens. Notably, the risk of adverse events with VPZ-HD-dual was significantly lower than with VPZ-quadruple.

CONCLUSION

Vonoprazan combined with high-dose amoxicillin dual therapy not only provides satisfactory eradication rates but also exhibits lower adverse event rates and good patient compliance, indicating its potential as a promising regimen for further promotion.

Efficacy and safety of tegoprazan for duodenal ulcers in Chinese patients: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority, phase III study

OBJECTIVE

Tegoprazan represents a newly developed potassium-competitive acid blocker utilized for the treatment of acid-related disorders. The present study aimed to explore the therapeutic effectiveness of tegoprazan in Chinese individuals with duodenal ulcers (DU).

METHODS

In the current multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority, phase III clinical trial, individuals with DU underwent randomization 1:1 to be administered tegoprazan 50 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg once daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was the 6-week cumulative endoscopic ulcer healing rate. Secondary endpoints included 4-week endoscopic ulcer healing rate and relief of DU-related gastrointestinal symptoms at weeks 2, 4, and 6. Safety analysis encompassed adverse events (AEs) and laboratory indexes.

RESULTS

The 6-week cumulative endoscopic ulcer healing rates were 96.9% (188/194) and 99.0% (189/191) in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups, respectively, indicating a difference of -2.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) = -4.9 to 0.8) in the full analysis set (FAS). The corresponding healing rates were 98.4% (185/188) and 99.5% (183/184) in the per-protocol set, respectively, indicating a difference of -1.1% (95% CI = -3.1 to 1.0). The 4-week healing rates in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups were 89.2% (173/194) and 88.5% (169/191) in the FAS, respectively, with a difference of 0.7% (95% CI = -5.6 to 7.0). Treatment-related AEs, all mild-to-moderate, were reported in 38.2% (78/204) and 48.2% (94/195) of participants in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Tegoprazan 50 mg once daily is effective and non-inferior to lansoprazole 30 mg once daily in Chinese patients with DU, showing a promising safety and tolerability profile.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05010954.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Integrating Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Into Clinical Practice: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

The purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Update (CPU) is to summarize the available evidence and offer expert Best Practice Advice on the integration of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) in the clinical management of foregut disorders, specifically including gastroesophageal reflux disease, Helicobacter pylori infection, and peptic ulcer disease.

METHODS

This expert review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Governing Board and CPU Committee to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership. This CPU expert review underwent internal peer review by the CPU Committee and external peer review through the standard procedures of Gastroenterology. These Best Practice Advice statements were developed based on review of the published literature and expert consensus opinion. Because formal systematic reviews were not performed, these Best Practice Advice statements do not carry formal ratings of the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Based on nonclinical factors (including cost, greater obstacles to obtaining medication, and fewer long-term safety data), clinicians should generally not use P-CABs as initial therapy for acid-related conditions in which clinical superiority has not been shown. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Based on current costs in the United States, even modest clinical superiority of P-CABs over double-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may not make P-CABs cost-effective as first-line therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Clinicians should generally not use P-CABs as first-line therapy for patients with uninvestigated heartburn symptoms or nonerosive reflux disease. Clinicians may use P-CABs in selected patients with documented acid-related reflux who fail therapy with twice-daily PPIs. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Although there is currently insufficient evidence for clinicians to use P-CABs as first-line on-demand therapy for patients with heartburn symptoms who have previously responded to antisecretory therapy, their rapid onset of acid inhibition raises the possibility of their utility in this population. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Clinicians should generally not use P-CABs as first-line therapy in patients with milder erosive esophagitis (EE) (Los Angeles classification of erosive esophagitis grade A/B EE). Clinicians may use P-CABs in selected patients with documented acid-related reflux who fail therapy with twice-daily PPIs. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Clinicians may use P-CABs as a therapeutic option for the healing and maintenance of healing in patients with more severe EE (Los Angeles classification of erosive esophagitis grade C/D EE). However, given the markedly higher costs of the P-CAB presently available in the United States and the lack of randomized comparisons with double-dose PPIs, it is not clear that the benefits in endoscopic outcomes over standard-dose PPIs justify the routine use of P-CABs as first-line therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Clinicians should use P-CABs in place of PPIs in eradication regimens for most patients with H pylori infection. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Clinicians should generally not use P-CABs as first-line therapy in the treatment or prophylaxis of peptic ulcer disease. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Although there is currently insufficient evidence for clinicians to use P-CABs as first-line therapy in patients with bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers and high-risk stigmata, their rapid and potent acid inhibition raises the possibility of their utility in this population.

Tegoprazan-Amoxicillin Dual Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study in Fujian, China

INTRODUCTION

Few studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan-amoxicillin (TA) dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different dosages of TA dual therapy for H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter study was conducted at four centers in Fujian, China. H. pylori-infective patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive one of the following treatments: bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT, esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily + potassium bismuth citrate 240 mg twice daily + amoxicillin 1 g twice daily + clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily), tegoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapies (TA-qd, tegoprazan 50 mg once daily + amoxicillin 1 g thrice daily; TA-bid, tegoprazan 50 mg twice daily + amoxicillin 1 g thrice daily) for 14 days. The primary outcome was noninferiority in eradication rates of the different TA groups compared to the BQT group. Secondary outcomes encompassed an assessment of adverse reactions and clinical symptom relief. Additionally, exploratory outcomes were focused on the shifts in gut microbiota and a cost-effectiveness analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 321 patients were enrolled. The eradication rates in the BQT group, TA-qd group, and TA-bid group were 85.05% (91/107), 85.98% (92/107), and 85.98% (92/107) in the intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) (BQT vs. TA-qd, 95% CI -8.50% to 10.36%, noninferiority p = 0.012; BQT vs. TA-bid, 95% CI -8.50% to 10.36%, noninferiority p = 0.012); 91.00% (91/100), 91.09% (92/101), and 92.93% (92/99) in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (mITT) (BQT vs. TA-qd, 95% CI -7.81% to 7.98%, noninferiority p = 0.006; BQT vs. TA-bid, 95% CI -5.62% to 9.48%, noninferiority p < 0.001); 90.81% (89/98), 91.00% (91/100), and 93.81% (91/97) in the per-protocol analysis (PP) (BQT vs. TA-qd, 95% CI -7.83% to 8.19%, noninferiority p = 0.006; BQT vs. TA-bid, 95% CI 4.46% to 10.46%, noninferiority p < 0.001). The incidence of adverse reactions in the TA-qd and TA-bid groups was significantly lower than in the BQT group (13.33%, 14.56%, and 27.18%, respectively; p = 0.017). The complete remissions of clinical symptoms for BQT, TA-qd, and TA-bid were 36.89%, 65.71%, and 68.93%, respectively, had significant differences (p < 0.001). Two weeks of TA therapy altered gut microbiota diversity and composition, but that recovered 4 weeks after discontinuation. The cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) for BQT, TA-qd, and TA-bid were 1.85 CNY, 2.08 CNY, and 3.69 CNY, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both TA dual therapies provided satisfactory eradication rates of > 90% for eradicating H. pylori, fewer adverse reactions, and greater clinical symptom relief compared to BQT, with a mild, reversible impact on gut microbiota. In addition, the TA dual therapy with low doses of tegoprazan showed better cost-effectiveness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Register and registration No.: ChiCTR2300071997.

Vonoprazan is Not Inferior to Proton Pump Inhibitors in Bismuth-containing Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication : A Meta-analysis of 10 Studies From East Asia

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (VBCQ) in eradicating Helicobacter pylori ( Hp ).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The VBCQ and the proton pump inhibitor-based bismuth-containing quadruple regimen (PBCQ) were compared by retrieving relevant studies in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang data. Combined analysis was performed with risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI as effect values.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies were enrolled, including 7 randomized controlled trials and 3 cohort studies. In intention-to-treat analysis, the eradication rate of VBCQ (89.24%, 1103/1236) was significantly higher than that of PBCQ (84.03%, 1021/1215), with RR = 1.06 (95% CI: 1.03~1.10). In per-protocol analysis, the eradication rates of VBCQ and PBCQ were 92.94% (895/963) and 87.82% (829/944), respectively, with a significant difference (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03~1.09). Subgroup analysis of study design types shared similar results. VBCQ and PBCQ showed an incidence of adverse reactions of 37.30% (304/815) and 34.94% (282/807), respectively. Significant differences were not found between the two groups (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.96-1.19), nor in subgroup analysis. The good compliance rates in VBCQ and PBCQ groups were 94.32% (216/229) and 95.13% (215/226), respectively, with no significant difference (RR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.95~1.04).

CONCLUSION

VBCQ has a higher eradication rate on Hp than PBCQ, while its adverse reactions and compliance are similar to PBCQ. However, we conservatively believe that in Hp eradication, the VBCQ is not inferior to PBCQ because of the small absolute difference.

Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers: Current Clinical Use and Future Developments

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) represents the standard of care in the treatment of acid-related diseases. However, despite their effectiveness, PPIs display some intrinsic limitations, which underlie the unmet clinical needs that have been identified over the past decades. The aims of this review are to summarize the current status and future development of the new class of antisecretory drugs (potassium-competitive acid blockers, P-CABs) that have recently been introduced into medical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past decades, clinical needs unmet by the current acid suppressants have been recognized, especially in the management of patients with GERD, Helicobacter pylori infection and NSAID-related peptic ulcer. The failure to address these needs is mainly due to their inability to achieve a consistent acid suppression in all patients and, particularly, to control nighttime acidity. It was then realized that an extended duration of acid suppression would exert additional benefits. The available data with P-CABs show that they are able to address these unmet clinical needs. Four different P-CABs (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, fexuprazan and keverprazan) are currently available. However, only two of them are approved outside Asia. Vonoprazan is available in North, Central and South America while tegoprazan is marketed only in Latin American countries. Two other compounds (namely linazapran glurate and zestaprazan) are presently under clinical development. While clinical trials on GERD have been performed with all P-CABs, only vonoprazan and tegoprazan have been investigated as components of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. The available data show that-in the above two clinical indications-P-CABs provide similar or better efficacy in comparison with PPIs. Their safety in the short-term overlaps that of PPIs, but data from long-term treatment are needed.

Experimental drugs for erosive esophagitis: what is in the clinical development pipeline?

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) has revolutionized the treatment of erosive esophagitis (EE) in the past few decades. However, roughly 30-40% of the patients, especially those with severe EE (Los Angeles Grade C/D), remain poorly responsive to this medication. Novel drugs have been formulated and/or repurposed to address this problem.

AREAS COVERED

This review highlights novel drugs that have been investigated for use in EE, such as mucosal protectants, prokinetics, transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) reducers, novel PPIs, and the new potassium-competitive acid blocker (PCAB). Studies have demonstrated that PCAB has promising results (efficacy and safety) compared to PPI for the healing of EE, especially in severe diseases.

EXPERT OPINION

PCAB has gained interest in recent years, with pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics properties surpassing PPI. Although recent data on PCABs, which comprised mainly of Vonoprazan, have shown promising results, more randomized controlled trials for other PCAB drugs are needed to elucidate and confirm the superiority of this drug class to PPI, the current first-line treatment of EE.

Vonoprazan vs. Proton Pump Inhibitors for Treatment and Prevention of Gastric and/or Duodenal Ulcers: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Although Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is superior to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in treating Helicobacter pylori and erosive esophagitis, its efficacy for treating gastric and/or duodenal ulcers remains controversial. This meta-analysis summarizes the efficacy and safety of Vonoprazan vs. PPI for treating and preventing gastric and/or duodenal ulcers.

METHODS

Only randomized controlled trials randomizing gastric and/or duodenal ulcer patients, regardless of etiology, into Vonoprazan or any PPI and indexed in Embase, Medline, and CENTRAL until March 2, 2024 were searched. Primary outcomes were ulcer healing rates at Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 and recurrence rates at Week 24. Other outcomes included shrinkage rates, any adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and risks of delayed bleeding and perforation. The overall risk ratio (RR) and mean difference were pooled using the random-effects model. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) Tool.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies comprising 43 reports were included in the analysis. Healing rates of gastric and/or duodenal ulcers were similar in both Vonoprazan and PPI groups at all weeks (Week 2 RR 1.02 [95% CI 0.89-1.16]; Week 4 0.99 [95% CI 0.95-1.04]; Week 6 1.00 [95% CI 0.96-1.03]; Week 8 0.99 [95% CI 0.95-1.03]). The recurrence prevention of peptic ulcers was not different in Vonoprazan 10 mg (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.18-1.27) or 20 mg (0.60; 95% CI 0.28-1.30) to PPI. Shrinkage rates, any AEs, SAEs, and risks of delayed bleeding and perforation were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Vonoprazan is not significantly better than PPI in treating and preventing gastric and/or duodenal ulcers.

Comparison of Amoxicillin Administered Twice versus Four Times a Day in First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication Using Tegoprazan, Clarithromycin, and Bismuth: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

This study aimed to investigate the effects of different amoxicillin (AMX) dosing schedules on bismuth quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori treatment-naïve patients. A total of 139 H. pylori-infected patients received a 2-week eradication regimen consisting of 50 mg tegoprazan, 500 mg clarithromycin, and 300 mg bismuth tripotassium dicitrate twice daily, 1000 mg AMX twice daily (BID group), or 500 mg AMX four times daily (QID group). We performed a urea breath test to evaluate H. pylori eradication eight weeks after treatment and compared the H. pylori eradication rate, patient compliance, and adverse drug events between the BID and QID groups. Based on propensity score matching, 114 and 100 patients were included in intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses, respectively. The H. pylori eradication rate did not differ significantly according to the ITT (82.5% vs. 87.7%, p = 0.429) and PP (95.9% vs. 98.0%, p = 0.536) analyses between the BID and QID groups. No significant differences were found in treatment compliance or adverse drug event rates between the two groups. In conclusion, the eradication rate of first-line H. pylori therapy containing tegoprazan, clarithromycin, and bismuth was not affected by AMX dosing schedules administered twice and four times daily.

Comparison of Vonoprazan Versus Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitor for Prevention of High-Risk Peptic Ulcers Rebleeding After Successful Endoscopic Hemostasis: A Multicenter Randomized Noninferiority Trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

High-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy has been recommended to prevent rebleeding of high-risk peptic ulcer (PU) after hemostasis. Vonoprazan has been proven to be noninferior to PPIs in various acid-related diseases. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of vonoprazan vs PPI for preventing high-risk PU rebleeding after hemostasis.

METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, noninferiority study was conducted in 6 centers. Pre-endoscopic and endoscopic therapy were performed according to standard protocol. After successful hemostasis, patients with high-risk PU bleeding (Forrest class Ia/Ib, IIa/IIb) were randomized into 1:1 to receive vonoprazan (20 mg twice a day for 3 days, then 20 mg once a day for 28 days) or high-dose PPI (pantoprazole intravenous infusion 8 mg/h for 3 days, then omeprazole 20 mg twice a day for 28 days). The primary outcome was a 30-day rebleeding rate. Secondary outcomes included 3- and 7-day rebleeding rate, all-cause and bleeding-related mortality, rate of rescue therapy, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and safety.

RESULTS

Of 194 patients, baseline characteristics, severity of bleeding, and stage of ulcers were comparable between the 2 groups. The 30-day rebleeding rates in vonoprazan and PPI groups were 7.1% (7 of 98) and 10.4% (10 of 96), respectively; noninferiority (within 10% margin) of vonoprazan to PPI was confirmed (%risk difference, -3.3; 95% confidence interval, -11.2 to 4.7; P < .001). The 3-day and 7-day rebleeding rates in the vonoprazan group remained noninferior to PPI (P < .001 by Farrington and Manning test). All secondary outcomes were also comparable between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with high-risk PU bleeding, the efficacy of vonoprazan in preventing 30-day rebleeding was noninferior to intravenous PPI. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT05005910).

Bismuth add-on improves the efficacy of 2-week tegoprazan-based triple therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a real-world evidence study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of bismuth added to a 2-week triple therapy consisting of tegoprazan (TPZ), amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We reviewed the retrospective data of patients who received a 2-week TPZ-based triple therapy with or without 300 mg bismuth twice daily. The primary endpoint was the H. pylori eradication rate of adding bismuth to the TPZ-based triple regimen (TAC-B group), compared to no bismuth added (TAC group).

RESULTS

In total, 306 and 256 patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses, respectively. The eradication success rates were significantly higher in the TAC-B group than in the TAC group (ITT, 82.9% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.029; PP, 95.8% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.027, respectively). The adherence rate to the eradication regimen was 100% in the TAC-B group and 97.0% in the TAC group. The adverse drug event rate in the TAC-B group was comparable to that in the TAC group (29.2% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.742). No use of bismuth was significantly associated with eradication failure (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

The bismuth add-on increased the first-line H. pylori eradication rate of 2-week TPZ-based triple therapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05453994.

A Closer Look into Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Heart Failure Patients

BACKGROUND

The frequency and risk factors for gastrointestinal bleed (GIB) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have not been extensively researched.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to assess the frequency of GIB in this subset of patients and identify potential risk factors for bleeding. This study will evaluate the frequency of commonly used antiplatelet and anticoagulation agents in the HFrEF population, as well as look at some of the endoscopic features of the GIB.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of 670 patients admitted between November 2021 to August 2023 to a single urban, tertiary teaching institution with acute HFrEF ICD-10 codes. Upper or lower GIB (hematemesis, coffee ground emesis, melena or hematochezia during admission) was identified on a manual chart review. Patients with GIB were defined as our cases. No GIB was defined as our controls. Sub analysis included comparing the use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet between the cohort. Independent t test assessed statistical differences in the case and control groups RESULTS: Out of the 670 patients, 134 (20%) were identified with GIB. The cases were older than the controls (median age 77 vs. 70 years) (p = 0.001), had a lower hemoglobin (9 g/dL vs. 12 g/dL) (p =<0.05), and had higher BNP levels (7,938 pg/ml vs. 6472 pg/ml) (IQR: 3,239, 23,701) (p =<0.01). Among the anticoagulant users, 64% of cases were on an anticoagulant compared to 42% of the controls (p<0.05). Among the antiplatelet users, 68% of the controls were on one or more antiplatelet agents, compared to 52% in the controls (p = 0.01). When combining AC and AP treatment, there was no statistical difference between cases and controls. Ninety-three (69%) patients from cases had cross-sectional imaging with only 23 (25%) showing abnormal findings which included diverticulosis, colitis, and GI masses. When comparing upper endoscopy findings, the presence of esophageal diseases (esophagitis and esophageal varices) and gastric/duodenal diseases (gastritis, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer and AVM) were significantly higher in cases compared to controls (p < 0.05). In addition to the colonoscopy findings, polyps and diverticulosis were more prevalent in the cases compared to the controls (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Heart failure patients are at risk of developing GIB. Age and high BNP on admission are risk factors for GIB, the higher the BNP levels the higher risk of GIB. Anticoagulant and antiplatelet use are associated with a higher risk of bleeding. However, the addition of dual antiplatelet therapy or concurrent antiplatelet and anticoagulation does not increase the risk of GIB. Some of the most common upper endoscopy findings include esophagitis/gastritis and esophageal/gastric ulcer. In terms of colonoscopy, findings include colonic mass, diverticulosis and hemorrhoids.

Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers vs Proton Pump Inhibitors for Peptic Ulcer Disease or Postprocedural Artificial Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and postprocedural artificial ulcers are common ulcer disease. For them, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) are commonly used in clinical practice. PPI requires acid, time, and multiple doses, but P-CAB has fewer limitations. We compared the efficacy, safety, and prevention of PPI and P-CAB in PUD or artificial ulcer.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov , Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for all studies. All eligible randomized controlled trials up to August 5, 2023, were included. Healing rates, shrinking rates, treatment-emergent adverse events rates, and recurrence rates were measured. Risk of bias, sensitivity analyses, and heterogeneity were also performed.

RESULTS

Twenty researches that were selected from 926 screening studies and in total 6,551 participants were included. The risk ratio (RR) of healing rate with P-CABs vs PPIs of PUD at 4 weeks was RR 1.01 (95% confidence interval 0.98-1.04). In addition, the healing rate distinction of artificial peptic ulcer was RR 1.04 (0.89-1.22), and the shrinking rate was mean difference 0.10 (-1.30-1.51). The result of treatment-emergent adverse event rate of PUD was RR 1.11 (0.91-1.35), and the delayed bleeding rate of artificial ulcer was RR 0.35 (0.16-0.80). The RR for recurrence rate of drug-related ulcers was 0.45 (0.25-0.81).

DISCUSSION

P-CAB is noninferior in healing artificial ulcer and PUD, also the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. But, there may be a statistical advantage in holding back delayed bleeding and preventing drug-induced ulcers. More standardized experiments are needed for further applications and more precise conclusions.

GERD: Latest update on acid-suppressant drugs

GERD is a very familiar diagnosis among health care providers due to its massive spread, and its symptoms can affect the quality of life for a respectable slice of its patients. Therefore, what can only be described as a logical consequence, a pursuit of a treatment that can both relieve symptoms and have minimal side effects is still ongoing to cover the large demographic affected by GERD. In the following review, analysis will be made of GERD, including possible regulatory activity, of certain drugs to the already discussed pathways involved in GERD patients.

Efficacy of Tegoprazan in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-arm Study

Background/Aims

Acid-suppressive drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), are treatment options for functional dyspepsia (FD). However, the efficacy of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) in treating FD has not yet been established. This prospective multicenter clinical trial-based study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan as a P-CAB treatment in patients with FD.

Methods

FD was diagnosed using the Rome IV criteria. All patients received tegoprazan 50 mg once daily for 8 weeks. Dyspeptic symptoms were assessed using a dyspepsia symptom questionnaire (5-point Likert scale, Nepean Dyspepsia Index-Korean [NDI-K], and gastroesophageal reflux disease-health-related quality of life [GERD-HRQL]). The main outcome was satisfactory symptom relief rates at 8 weeks.

Results

In this study, from the initial screening of 209 patients, 173 were included in the per-protocol set analysis. Satisfactory symptom relief rates at 8 and 4 weeks were 86.7% and 74.6%, respectively. In addition, the NDI-K and GERD-HRQL scores significantly improved at 8 and 4 weeks compared with the baseline scores. The efficacy of tegoprazan was not influenced by the FD subtype or Helicobacter pylori status. In patients with overlapping FD and GERD, there was a greater improvement in the NDI-K and GERD-HRQL scores than in patients with FD symptoms only. No serious drug-related adverse events occurred during this study.

Conclusion

Tegoprazan (50 mg) administered once daily provided satisfactory symptom relief for FD.

Comparison of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers and Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) compared to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, and 11 randomized controlled trials comparing PCABs with PPIs were included. The primary outcome was the healing of erosive esophagitis (EE), with secondary outcomes, including relief of heartburn symptoms and adverse events. The analysis included 11 studies and a pooled sample of 4,108 GERD patients. Results showed that PCABs were significantly more effective in healing EE compared to PPIs (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.24-2.24, p<0.01). PCABs also demonstrated a higher rate of complete resolution of heartburn symptoms, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.98-2.09, p=0.06). In terms of safety, there was no significant difference in adverse events between PCABs and PPIs (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.79-1.04, p=0.18), including serious adverse events. The superior efficacy of PCABs can be attributed to their unique pharmacological properties, which allow for more rapid and potent acid suppression compared to PPIs. However, the long-term safety profile of PCABs, particularly newer agents, requires further investigation. The study was limited by the predominance of vonoprazan among the PCABs studied and the focus on patients with EE rather than non-erosive reflux disease. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that PCABs are more effective than PPIs in treating GERD, particularly in healing EE, while maintaining a comparable safety profile. Future research should focus on evaluating a wider range of PCABs, assessing their efficacy in non-erosive reflux disease, and investigating their long-term safety in GERD management.

A Comprehensive Review on the Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan in the Management of Gastric Acid-Related Diseases

Gastric acid-related diseases, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), peptic ulcer disease (PUD), and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, present significant clinical challenges due to their prevalence and potential for severe complications. Effective management of these conditions is essential for symptom relief, mucosal healing, and prevention of complications. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), in the treatment of gastric acid-related diseases and to compare it with traditional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). A comprehensive analysis of clinical trials and studies was conducted to assess the effectiveness of vonoprazan in managing GERD, PUD, and H. pylori infection. The safety profile of vonoprazan was also reviewed, and comparisons were made to PPIs and other gastric acid suppressants. Vonoprazan demonstrates superior and more consistent acid suppression than PPIs, resulting in rapid and sustained symptom relief and mucosal healing. Clinical trials have shown its efficacy in treating GERD, PUD, and H. pylori infection, with higher eradication rates for H. pylori when used in combination therapies. The safety profile of vonoprazan is favorable, with fewer adverse effects and drug interactions compared to PPIs. Vonoprazan offers a promising alternative to traditional PPIs for the management of gastric acid-related diseases. Its unique mechanism of action and superior efficacy make it a valuable option for patients requiring effective and reliable acid suppression. Further research is warranted to explore its potential in broader clinical applications and to establish long-term safety data.

Efficacy of Vonoprazan vs. Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitor in Prevention of Re-Bleeding of High-Risk Peptic Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Background: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is well-established for its effectiveness in reducing re-bleeding in high-risk peptic ulcer patients following endoscopic hemostasis. Vonoprazan (VPZ) has demonstrated the capacity to achieve gastric pH levels exceeding 4, comparable to PPIs. This study aims to evaluate the comparative efficacy of intravenous PPI infusion versus VPZ in preventing re-bleeding after endoscopic hemostasis in patients with high-risk peptic ulcers. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, controlled, and double-dummy design was employed. Patients with peptic ulcer bleeding (Forrest class IA/IB or IIA/IIB) who underwent endoscopic hemostasis were randomly assigned to either the PPI group or the VPZ group. Re-bleeding rates at 3, 7, and 30 days, the number of blood transfusions required, length of hospitalization, and ulcer healing rate at 56 days were assessed. Results: A total of 44 eligible patients were enrolled, including 20 patients (PPI group, n = 11; VPZ group, n = 9) with high-risk peptic ulcers. The mean age was 66 years, with 70% being male. Re-bleeding within 72 h occurred in 9.1% of the PPI group versus 0% in the VPZ group (p = 1.000). There was no significant difference in re-bleeding rates within 7 days and 30 days (18.2% vs. 11.1%, p = 1.000). Additionally, the ulcer healing rate did not significantly differ between the groups (87.5% vs. 77.8%). Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates comparable efficacy between oral vonoprazan and continuous PPI infusion in preventing recurrent bleeding events among high-risk peptic ulcer patients following successful endoscopic hemostasis.

In Vitro Metabolism and Transport Characteristics of Zastaprazan

Zastaprazan (JP-1366), a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is a new drug for the treatment of erosive esophagitis. JP-1366 is highly metabolized in human, mouse, and dog hepatocytes but moderately metabolized in rat and monkey hepatocytes when estimated from the metabolic stability of this compound in hepatocyte suspension and when 18 phase I metabolites and 5 phase II metabolites [i.e., N-dearylation (M6), hydroxylation (M1, M19, M21), dihydroxylation (M7, M8, M14, M22), trihydroxylation (M13, M18), hydroxylation and reduction (M20), dihydroxylation and reduction (M9, M16), hydrolysis (M23), hydroxylation and glucuronidation (M11, M15), hydroxylation and sulfation (M17), dihydroxylation and sulfation (M10, M12), N-dearylation and hydroxylation (M3, M4), N-dearylation and dihydroxylation (M5), and N-dearylation and trihydroxylation (M2)] were identified from JP-1366 incubation with the hepatocytes from humans, mice, rats, dogs, and monkeys. Based on the cytochrome P450 (CYP) screening test and immune-inhibition analysis with CYP antibodies, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 played major roles in the metabolism of JP-1366 to M1, M3, M4, M6, M8, M9, M13, M14, M16, M18, M19, M21, and M22. CYP1A2, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, and 2D6 played minor roles in the metabolism of JP-1366. UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B7 and UGT2B17 were responsible for the glucuronidation of M1 to M15. However, JP-1366 and active metabolite M1 were not substrates for drug transporters such as organic cation transporter (OCT) 1/2, organic anion transporter (OAT) 1/3, organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1/1B3, multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE)1/2K, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and breast cancer-resistant protein (BCRP). Only M1 showed substrate specificity for P-gp. The findings indicated that drug-metabolizing enzymes, particularly CYP3A4/3A5, may have a significant role in determining the pharmacokinetics of zastaprazan while drug transporters may only have a small impact on the absorption, distribution, and excretion of this compound.

RETRACTED: A Phase III Head-to-Head Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan and Esomeprazole in Treating Patients with Erosive Esophagitis

Background: Fexuprazan (Fexuclue®; Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB). This multi-center, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, therapeutic confirmatory, phase III study was conducted to assess its efficacy and safety compared with esomeprazole (Nexium®; AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden) in Korean patients with erosive esophagitis (EE). Methods: This study evaluated patients diagnosed with EE at a total of 25 institutions in Korea between 13 December 2018 and 7 August 2019. After voluntarily submitting a written informed consent form, the patients were evaluated using a screening test and then randomized to either of the two treatment arms. The proportion of the patients who achieved the complete recovery of mucosal breaks at 4 and 8 weeks, the proportion of those who achieved the complete recovery of heartburn at 3 and 7 days and 8 weeks, and changes in the GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (GERD-HRQL) scores at 4 and 8 weeks from baseline served as efficacy outcome measures. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and the serum gastrin levels served as safety outcome measures. Results: The study population comprised a total of 231 patients (n = 231) with EE, including 152 men (65.80%) and 79 women (34.20%); their mean age was 54.37 ± 12.66 years old. There were no significant differences in the efficacy and safety outcome measures between the two treatment arms (p > 0.05). Conclusions: It can be concluded that the efficacy and safety of Fexuclue® are not inferior to those of esomeprazole in Korean patients with EE.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers vs. Proton Pump Inhibitors for Peptic Ulcer with or without Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Novel potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have emerged as effective acid-suppressive drugs in recent years, replacing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of P-CABs versus PPIs in the treatment of peptic ulcers with or without Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. We searched in PubMed, Embase, WOS, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, and Wanfang databases (all years up to January 2024). Efficacy and safety outcomes were evaluated using odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) probabilities were used to rank each intervention. Among 14,056 studies screened, 56 studies involving 9792 participants were analyzed. Vonoprazan demonstrated the best efficacy in ulcer healing rate and H. pylori eradication rate (SUCRA = 86.4% and 90.7%, respectively). Keverprazan ranked second in ulcer healing rates (SUCRA = 76.0%) and was more effective in pain remission rates (SUCRA = 91.7%). The risk of adverse events was low for keverprazan (SUCRA = 11.8%) and tegoprazan (SUCRA = 12.9%), and moderate risk for vonoprazan (SUCRA = 44.3%) was demonstrated. Compared to lansoprazole, vonoprazan exhibited a higher risk of drug-related adverse events (OR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.60-2.89) and serious adverse events (OR: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.11-4.42). Subgroup analysis on patients with H. pylori-positive peptic ulcers showed that vonoprazan was at the top of the SUCRA rankings, followed by keverprazan. Vonoprazan showed superior performance in peptic ulcers, especially for patients with H. pylori-positive peptic ulcers. However, the risk of adverse events associated with vonoprazan should be noted. Keverprazan has also shown good therapeutic outcomes and has performed better in terms of safety.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Tegoprazan and the Combination of Clarithromycin, Amoxicillin and Bismuth in Healthy Chinese Subjects: An Open-Label, Single-Center, Multiple-Dosage, Self-Controlled, Phase I Trial

BACKGROUND

Tegoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker that inhibits gastric acid and which may be used for eradicating Helicobacter pylori. This study focuses on the pharmacokinetic interaction and safety between tegoprazan and the combination of clarithromycin, amoxicillin and bismuth in healthy Chinese subjects.

METHODS

An open-label, three-period, single-center, multiple-dosage, single-sequence, phase I trial was conducted in 22 healthy subjects. In period 1, the subjects took tegoprazan 50 mg twice daily for 7 days, and in period 2 they were administered clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg and bismuth potassium citrate 600 mg twice daily for 7 days (days 14-20). Tegoprazan, clarithromycin, amoxicillin and bismuth potassium citrate were then administered in combination for 7 days (days 21-27) in period 3. Blood samples were collected up to 12 h after the last dose of each period. Safety assessments were performed in each period.

RESULTS

The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) [90% confidence interval (CI)] of maximum plasma concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUCτ) at steady state were 195.93% (175.52-218.71%) and 287.54% (263.28-314.04%) for tegoprazan and 423.23% (382.57-468.22%) and 385.61% (354.62-419.30%) for tegoprazan metabolite M1, respectively. The GMRs (90% CI) of Cmax,ss and AUCτ were 83.69% (77.44-90.45%) and 110.30% (102.74-118.41%) for clarithromycin, 126.25% (114.73-138.93%) and 146.94% (135.33-159.55%) for 14-hydroxyclarithromycin, 75.89% (69.73-82.60%) and 94.34% (87.94-101.20%) for amoxicillin, and 158.43% (125.43-200.11%) and 183.63% (156.42-215.58%) for bismuth, respectively. All reported adverse events were mild. The frequency of adverse events during the coadministration stage was not higher than that during the single- or triple-drug administration stages.

CONCLUSION

The plasma exposure of tegoprazan, M1, 14-hydroxyclarithromycin and bismuth was increased after the coadministration of tegoprazan, clarithromycin, amoxicillin and bismuth. The coadministration exhibited favorable safety and tolerability.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

CTR20230643.

Vonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg vs. lansoprazole 15 mg as maintenance therapy in Asian patients with healed erosive esophagitis: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Erosive esophagitis (EE) is a gastroesophageal reflux disease characterized by mucosal breaks in the esophagus. Proton pump inhibitors are widely used as maintenance therapy for EE, but many patients still relapse. In this trial, we evaluated the noninferiority of vonoprazan vs. lansoprazole as maintenance therapy in patients with healed EE.

METHODS

We performed a double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial among non-Japanese Asian adults with endoscopically confirmed healed EE from April 2015 to February 2019. Patients from China, South Korea, and Malaysia were randomized to vonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg once daily or lansoprazole 15 mg once daily for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was endoscopically confirmed EE recurrence rate over 24 weeks with a noninferiority margin of 10% using a two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded.

RESULTS

Among 703 patients, EE recurrence was observed in 24/181 (13.3%) and 21/171 (12.3%) patients receiving vonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg, respectively, and 47/184 (25.5%) patients receiving lansoprazole (differences: -12.3% [95% CI, -20.3% to -4.3%] and -13.3% [95% CI, -21.3% to -5.3%], respectively), meeting the primary endpoint of noninferiority to lansoprazole in preventing EE recurrence at 24 weeks. Evidence of superiority (upper bound of 95% CI <0%) was also observed. At 12 weeks, endoscopically confirmed EE recurrence was observed in 5/18, 2/20, and 7/20 of patients receiving vonoprazan 10 mg, vonoprazan 20 mg, and lansoprazole, respectively. TEAEs were experienced by 66.8% (157/235), 69.0% (156/226), and 65.3% (158/242) of patients receiving vonoprazan 10 mg, vonoprazan 20 mg, and lansoprazole, respectively. The most common TEAE was upper respiratory tract infection in 12.8% (30/235) and 12.8% (29/226) patients in vonoprazan 10 mg and 20 mg groups, respectively and 8.7% (21/242) patients in lansoprazole group.

CONCLUSION

Vonoprazan maintenance therapy was well-tolerated and noninferior to lansoprazole for preventing EE recurrence in Asian patients with healed EE.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02388737.

Comparison of vonoprazan dual therapy, quadruple therapy and standard quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in Hainan: a single-center, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the potential efficacy and safety of dual therapy and quadruple therapy with vonoprazan (VPZ) as well as the standard quadruple therapy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection in Hainan province.

METHODS

A single-centre, non-blinded, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted at the outpatient department of gastroenterology at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University from June 2022 to February 2023. 135 patients aged 18-75 years with Hp infection were enrolled and randomized into three different groups (group V1: VPZ 20 mg twice a day and amoxicillin 1.0 g three times a day for 14 days V2: vonoprazan 20 mg, amoxicillin capsules 1.0 g, furazolidone 0.1 g and bismuth potassiulm citrate 240 mg, twice daily for 14 days;; group V3: ilaprazole 5 mg, Amoxicillin 1.0 g, Furazolidone 100 mg, bismuth potassiulm citrate 240 mg, twice a day for 14 days). Four weeks after the end of treatment, Hp eradication was confirmed by rechecking 13C-urea breath test (UBT).

RESULTS

The eradication efficacy of V1 and V3 was non-inferior to that of V2, which is consistent with the results obtained from the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The eradication rate by intentional analysis was 84.4% (38/45, 95%CI 73.4%-95.5%, P>0.05) for all the three groups. If analyzed by per-protocol, the eradication rates were 88.4% (38/43, 95%CI 78.4%-98.4%), 92.7% (38/41, 95%CI 84.4%-101.0%),88.4% (38/43，95%CI 78.4%-98.4%) in groups V1, V2 and V3, respectively, which did not show a significant difference (P > 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was significantly lower in VPZ dual therapy compared to the other two treatment regimens (P < 0.05). VPZ dual therapy or quadruple therapy was also relatively less costly than standard quadruple therapy.

CONCLUSION

VPZ dual therapy and quadruple therapy shows promise of not being worse than the standard quadruple therapy by a clinically relevant margin. More studies might be needed to definitively determine if the new therapy is equally effective or even superior.

The efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in treating erosive esophagitis: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Fexuprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB). This study aimed to explore the noninferior efficacy and safety of fexuprazan to esomeprazole in treating erosive esophagitis (EE).

METHODS

This was a phase III, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. Patients with endoscopically confirmed EE were randomized to receive fexuprazan 40 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg once a daily for 4-8 weeks. The healing rates of EE, symptom response, GERD-health-related quality life (GERD-HRQL), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were compared between fexuprazan group and esomeprazole group.

RESULTS

A total of 332 subjects were included in full analysis set (FAS) and 311 in per-protocol set (PPS). The healing rates of fexuprazan and esomeprazole groups at 8 weeks were 88.5% (146/165) and 89.0% (145/163), respectively, in FAS and 97.3% (145/149) and 97.9% (143/146), respectively, in PPS. Noninferiority of fexuprazan compared with esomeprazole according to EE healing rates at 8 weeks was demonstrated in both FAS and PPS analysis. No significant difference was found between groups in EE healing rates at 4 weeks, symptom responses, and changes of GERD-HRQL. The incidence of drug-related AEs was 19.4% (32/165) in fexuprazan arm and 19.6% (32/163) in esomeprazole arm.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated noninferior efficacy of fexuprazan to esomeprazole in treating EE. The incidence of TEAEs was similar between fexuprazan and esomeprazole. Trial registration number NCT05813561.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori with potassium competitive acid blockers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infects over half the global population, causing gastrointestinal diseases like dyspepsia, gastritis, duodenitis, peptic ulcers, G-MALT lymphoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma. Eradicating H. pylori is crucial for treating and preventing these conditions. While conventional proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy is effective, there's growing interest in longer acid suppression therapies. Potassium competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) triple and dual therapy are new regimens for H. pylori eradication. Initially used in Asian populations, vonoprazan (VPZ) has been recently Food and Drug Administration-approved for H. pylori eradication.

AIM

To assess the efficacy of regimens containing P-CABs in eradicating H. pylori infection.

METHODS

This study, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching MEDLINE and Scopus libraries for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or observational studies with the following command: [("Helicobacter pylori" OR "H pylori") AND ("Treatment" OR "Therapy" OR "Eradication") AND ("Vonaprazan" OR "Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker" OR "P-CAB" OR "PCAB" OR "Revaprazan" OR "Linaprazan" OR "Soraprazan" OR "Tegoprazan")]. Studies comparing the efficacy of P-CABs-based treatment to classical PPIs in eradicating H. pylori were included. Exclusion criteria included case reports, case series, unpublished trials, or conference abstracts. Data variables encompassed age, diagnosis method, sample sizes, study duration, intervention and control, and H. pylori eradication method were gathered by two independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed in R software, and forest plots were generated.

RESULTS

A total of 256 references were initially retrieved through the search command. Ultimately, fifteen studies (7 RCTs, 7 retrospective observational studies, and 1 comparative unique study) were included, comparing P-CAB triple therapy to PPI triple therapy. The intention-to-treat analysis involved 8049 patients, with 4471 in the P-CAB intervention group and 3578 in the PPI control group across these studies. The analysis revealed a significant difference in H. pylori eradication between VPZ triple therapy and PPI triple therapy in both RCTs and observational studies [risk ratio (RR) = 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-1.22, P < 0.0001] and (RR = 1.13, 95%CI: 1.09-1.17, P < 0.0001], respectively. However, no significant difference was found between tegoprazan (TPZ) triple therapy and PPI triple therapy in both RCTs and observational studies (RR = 1.04, 95%CI: 0.93-1.16, P = 0.5) and (RR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.97-1.10, P = 0.3), respectively.

CONCLUSION

VPZ-based triple therapy outperformed conventional PPI-based triple therapy in eradicating H. pylori, positioning it as a highly effective first-line regimen. Additionally, TPZ-based triple therapy was non-inferior to classical PPI triple therapy.

A systematic review with meta-analysis: Efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blocker compared with proton pump inhibitor in the maintenance of healed erosive esophagitis

Introduction

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is the mainstay therapy for the maintenance of healed erosive esophagitis (EE). It is unknown whether potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) are more efficacious and safer than PPIs.

Methods

Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PCABs to PPIs in the maintenance of healing rates of endoscopically proven healed EE and indexed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL until 3 February 2024, were included. A fixed-effects model meta-analysis was performed to pool primary efficacy outcome (maintenance of healing rates at week 24) and safety data (any treatment-emergent adverse event or TEAE). The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool.

Results

Four RCTs with a total of 2554 patients were eligible for inclusion. All trials were of low risk of bias. Compared to lansoprazole 15 mg, the maintenance rates of healed EE at week 24 were significantly higher with vonoprazan 10 mg (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.07-1.19) and vonoprazan 20 mg (RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.10-1.21). Likewise, compared to lansoprazole 15 mg, any TEAEs were significantly greater with vonoprazan 20 mg (RR 1.10; 95% CI 1.01-1.20) but not vonoprazan 10 mg.

Conclusion

Vonoprazan 10 and 20 mg were superior to lansoprazole 15 mg in the maintenance of the healing of EE. Any TEAEs were greater with vonoprazan 20 mg.

Pantoprazole and Vonoprazan Performed Well in Preventing Peptic Ulcer Recurrence in Low-Dose Aspirin Users

BACKGROUND

Low-dose aspirin (LDA) administration is associated with an elevated risk of recurring peptic ulcer (PU) and gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage.

AIMS

This systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively assess the effectiveness of diverse medications in preventing the recurrence of PU and GI hemorrhage in patients with a history of PU receiving long-term LDA therapy.

METHODS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023406550). We searched relevant studies in main databases from inception to March 2023. All statistical analyses were performed using R (version 4.1.3), with the "Gemtc" (version 1.0-1) package. The pooled risk ratio (RR), corresponding 95% credible interval (95% CrI), and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were calculated.

RESULTS

11 Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. The analysis underscored pantoprazole was the most efficacious for reducing the risk of PU recurrence (RR [95% CrI] = 0.02 [0, 0.28]; SUCRA: 90.76%), followed by vonoprazan (RR [95% CrI] = 0.03 [0, 0.19]; SUCRA: 86.47%), comparing with the placebo group. Pantoprazole also performed well in preventing GI hemorrhage (RR [95% CrI] = 0.01[0, 0.42]; SUCRA: 87.12%) compared with Teprenone.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with a history of PU receiving LDA, pantoprazole and vonoprazan might be the optimal choices to prevent PU recurrence and GI hemorrhage.

Evolving Concepts in Helicobacter pylori Management

Helicobacter pylori is the most common chronic bacterial infection worldwide and the most significant risk factor for gastric cancer, which remains a leading cause of cancer-related death globally. H pylori and gastric cancer continue to disproportionately impact racial and ethnic minority and immigrant groups in the United States. The approach to H pylori case-finding thus far has relied on opportunistic testing based on symptoms or high-risk indicators, such as racial or ethnic background and family history. However, this approach misses a substantial proportion of individuals infected with H pylori who remain at risk for gastric cancer because most infections remain clinically silent. Moreover, individuals with chronic H pylori infection are at risk for gastric preneoplastic lesions, which are also asymptomatic and only reliably diagnosed using endoscopy and biopsy. Thus, to make a significant impact in gastric cancer prevention, a systematic approach is needed to better identify individuals at highest risk of both H pylori infection and its complications, including gastric preneoplasia and cancer. The approach to H pylori eradication must also be optimized given sharply decreasing rates of successful eradication with commonly used therapies and increasing antimicrobial resistance. With growing acceptance that H pylori should be managed as an infectious disease and the increasing availability of susceptibility testing, we now have the momentum to abandon empirical therapies demonstrated to have inadequate eradication rates. Molecular-based susceptibility profiling facilitates selection of a personalized eradication regimen without necessitating an invasive procedure. An improved approach to H pylori eradication coupled with population-level programs for screening and treatment could be an effective and efficient strategy to prevent gastric cancer, especially in minority and potentially marginalized populations that bear the heaviest burden of H pylori infection and its complications.

Good clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. An expert review from the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología

INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is very prevalent in the general population, with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations, requiring accurate diagnosis and treatment.

AIM

The aim of this expert review is to establish good clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and personalized treatment of GERD.

METHODS

The good clinical practice recommendations were produced by a group of experts in GERD, members of the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología (AMG), after carrying out an extensive review of the published literature and discussing each recommendation at a face-to-face meeting. This document does not aim to be a clinical practice guideline with the methodology such a document requires.

RESULTS

Fifteen experts on GERD formulated 27 good clinical practice recommendations for recognizing the symptoms and complications of GERD, the rational use of diagnostic tests and medical treatment, the identification and management of refractory GERD, the overlap with functional disorders, endoscopic and surgical treatment, and GERD in the pregnant woman, older adult, and the obese patient.

CONCLUSIONS

An accurate diagnosis of GERD is currently possible, enabling the prescription of a personalized treatment in patients with this condition. The goal of the good clinical practice recommendations by the group of experts from the AMG presented in this document is to aid both the general practitioner and specialist in the process of accurate diagnosis and treatment, in the patient with GERD.

Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan-Based Quadruple Therapy for the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Patients with Peptic Ulcers: A Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Phase 3 Trials

Helicobacter pylori eradication is crucial in the treatment of peptic ulcers caused by H. pylori infection, a disease highly prevalent in Asia. We present a pooled analysis of two randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for H. pylori eradication. Patients aged ≥18 years with endoscopically confirmed duodenal or gastric ulcers were randomized 1 : 1 to receive vonoprazan 20 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg once daily for up to 6 (duodenal ulcers) or 8 weeks (gastric ulcers). H. pylori-positive patients received vonoprazan- or lansoprazole-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for the first 2 weeks. H. pylori eradication was determined using the carbon-13 urea breath test at a follow-up visit 4 weeks post-treatment. The H. pylori eradication rate was 90.6% with vonoprazan vs. 85.2% with lansoprazole (difference: 5.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.1, 10.8). H. pylori eradication rates were 7.1% (95% CI: 1.4, 12.8) and 12.6% (95% CI: 3.9, 22.0) higher in patients aged <65 years and current smokers, respectively, with vonoprazan vs. lansoprazole. In the Chinese subpopulation, the H. pylori eradication rate was 92.0% with vonoprazan vs. 86.0% with lansoprazole (difference: 6.1%; 95% CI: 0.5, 11.7). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 72.7 vs. 62.6% of H. pylori-positive patients at baseline in the vonoprazan vs. lansoprazole arm. H. pylori eradication with vonoprazan-based quadruple therapy was noninferior to lansoprazole-based quadruple therapy and exceeded 90%, a clinically relevant threshold for determining the efficacy of H. pylori eradication regimens (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03050359; NCT03050307).

Efficacy comparison of 7- and 14-day P-CAB based bismuth-containing quadruple regimen with PPI based bismuth-containing quadruple regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection: rationale and design of an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Owing to its strong acid inhibition, potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) based regimens for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication are expected to offer clinical advantages over proton pump inhibitor (PPI) based regimens. This study aims to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of a 7-day and a 14-day P-CAB-based bismuth-containing quadruple regimen (PC-BMT) with those of a 14-day PPI-based bismuth-containing quadruple regimen (P-BMT) in patients with high clarithromycin resistance.

METHODS

This randomized multicenter controlled clinical trial will be performed at five teaching hospitals in Korea. Patients with H. pylori infection who are naive to treatment will be randomized into one of three regimens: 7-day or 14-day PC-BMT (tegoprazan 50 mg BID, bismuth subcitrate 300 mg QID, metronidazole 500 mg TID, and tetracycline 500 mg QID) or 14-day P-BMT. The eradication rate, treatment-related adverse events, and drug compliance will be evaluated and compared among the three groups. Antibiotic resistance testing by culture will be conducted during the trial, and these data will be used to interpret the results. A total of 366 patients will be randomized to receive 7-day PC-BMT (n = 122), 14-day PC-BMT (n = 122), or 14-day P-BMT (n = 122). The H. pylori eradication rates in the PC-BMT and P-BMT groups will be compared using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.

DISCUSSION

This study will demonstrate that the 7-day or 14-day PC-BMT is well tolerated and achieve similar eradication rates to those of 14-day P-BMT. Additionally, the 7-day PC-BMT will show fewer treatment-related adverse effects and higher drug compliance, owing to its reduced treatment duration.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Korean Clinical Research Information Service registry, KCT0007444. Registered on 28 June 2022, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index/index.do .

Pilot studies of vonoprazan-containing Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy suggest Thailand may be more similar to the US than Japan

BACKGROUND

Vonoprazan-containing Helicobacter pylori eradication is reliably effective in Japan. Its effectiveness in other countries remains unclear. Here, we examined vonoprazan-H. pylori therapies in Thailand.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was pilot study of four different vonoprazan containing therapies. Subjects were randomized to: 14-day dual therapy (500 mg amoxicillin q.i.d. plus 20 mg vonoprazan b.i.d.), 14-day triple therapy (amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., slow release clarithromycin-MR, 1 g daily plus vonoprazan 20 mg b.i.d.), 7-day high-dose vonoprazan triple therapy (amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., clarithromycin-MR 1 g daily and 60 mg vonoprazan once daily), and 14-day vonoprazan triple therapy plus bismuth (amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., clarithromycin-MR 1 g daily, vonoprazan 20 mg b.i.d., and bismuth subsalicylate 1048 mg b.i.d.). Eradication was confirmed 4 weeks after therapy. Antimicrobial susceptibility and CYP3A4/5 genotyping were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred H. pylori-infected patients (mean age 54.3 ± 13 years, 51% men) were randomized. All were CYP3A4 extensive metabolizers. Cure rates with both 14-day vonoprazan dual therapy and 14-day triple therapy were low: 66.7%; 95% CI = 43-85% (14/21), and 59.3%; 95% CI = 39-78%) (16/27), respectively. In contrast, 7-day high-dose vonoprazan triple therapy and 14-day vonoprazan triple plus bismuth proved effective 92.3%; 95% CI = 75%-99% (24/26) and 96.2%; 95% CI = 80%-100% (25/26), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both 14-day vonoprazan dual and triple therapy were ineffective for H. pylori eradication in Thailand. Higher dosage of vonoprazan, and/or the addition of bismuth may be required to achieve high H. pylori eradication rates. High-dose vonoprazan triple therapy and vonoprazan triple therapy adding bismuth might be used as first-line treatments in some regions with high efficacy irrespective of CYP3A4/5 genotype and clarithromycin resistance.

Assessments of CYP‑inhibition‑based drug-drug interaction between vonoprazan and poziotinib in vitro and in vivo

CONTEXT

Poziotinib and vonoprazan are two drugs mainly metabolized by CYP3A4. However, the drug-drug interaction between them is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To study the interaction mechanism and pharmacokinetics of poziotinib on vonoprazan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In vitro experiments were performed with rat liver microsomes (RLMs) and the contents of vonoprazan and its metabolite were then determined with UPLC-MS/MS after incubation of RLMs with vonoprazan and gradient concentrations of poziotinib. For the in vivo experiment, rats in the poziotinib treated group were given 5 mg/kg poziotinib by gavage once daily for 7 days, and the control group was only given 0.5% CMC-Na. On Day 8, tail venous blood was collected at different time points after the gavage administration of 10 mg/kg vonoprazan, and used for the quantification of vonoprazan and its metabolite. DAS and SPSS software were used for the pharmacokinetic and statistical analyses.

RESULTS

In vitro experimental data indicated that poziotinib inhibited the metabolism of vonoprazan (IC₅₀ = 10.6 μM) in a mixed model of noncompetitive and uncompetitive inhibition. The inhibitory constant K_i was 0.574 μM and the binding constant αK_i was 2.77 μM. In vivo experiments revealed that the AUC_(0-T) (15.05 vs. 90.95 μg/mL·h) and AUC_(0-∞) (15.05 vs. 91.99 μg/mL·h) of vonoprazan increased significantly with poziotinib pretreatment. The MRT_(0-∞) of vonoprazan increased from 2.29 to 5.51 h, while the CLz/F value decreased from 162.67 to 25.84 L/kg·h after pretreatment with poziotinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Poziotinib could significantly inhibit the metabolism of vonoprazan and more care may be taken when co-administered in the clinic.

Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan in Patients with Acute or Chronic Gastritis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Fexuprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that could be of benefit to patients with gastric mucosal injury. The aim of this study was to assess the 2-week efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in patients with acute or chronic gastritis.

METHODS

In this study, 327 patients with acute or chronic gastritis who had one or more gastric erosions on endoscopy and subjective symptoms were randomized into three groups receiving fexuprazan 20 mg once a day (q.d.), fexuprazan 10 mg twice a day (b.i.d.), or placebo for 2 weeks. The posttreatment assessments were the primary endpoint (erosion improvement rate), secondary endpoints (cure rates of erosion and edema and improvement rates of redness, hemorrhage, and subjective symptoms), and drug-related adverse events.

RESULTS

Among the patients, 57.8% (59/102), 65.7% (67/102), and 40.6% (39/96) showed erosion improvement 2 weeks after receiving fexuprazan 20 mg q.d., fexuprazan 10 mg b.i.d., and placebo, respectively. Both fexuprazan 20 mg q.d. and 10 mg b.i.d. showed superior efficacy to the placebo (p=0.017 and p<0.001, respectively). Likewise, both fexuprazan 20 mg q.d. and 10 mg b.i.d. also showed higher erosion healing rates than the placebo (p=0.033 and p=0.010, respectively). No difference was noted in the edema healing rate and the improvement rates for redness, hemorrhage, and subjective symptoms between the fexuprazan and placebo groups. No significant difference was noted in the incidence of adverse drug reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Fexuprazan 20 mg q.d. and 10 mg b.i.d. for 2 weeks showed therapeutic efficacy superior to that of placebo in patients with acute or chronic gastritis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04341454).

Efficacy of Vonoprazan vs. Pantoprazole or Non-acid Suppression in Prevention of Post-variceal Ligation Ulcer Bleeding in Portal Hypertension: A Multi-arm Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Up-to-date data about the role of acid suppression therapy e.g. proton-pump inhibitors; to reduce post-endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) ulcer-bleeding are conflicting. Vonoprazan; a recently introduced potassium-competitor acid blocker, has not been studied to prevent post-EVL ulcer/bleeding. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of vonoprazan vs. pantoprazole or non-acid suppression to prevent post-EVL ulcer/bleeding in portal hypertension patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We enrolled 275 portal hypertension patients undergoing EVL in a three-arm randomized, single-blind, controlled study. A clinico-laboratory baseline evaluation was performed. Following EVL, patients were randomly and equally assigned to receive vonoprazan 20mg once daily, pantoprazole 40 mg once daily, or no acid suppression therapy. Post-EVL ulcer bleeding, ulcer dimensions, odynophagia as well as vonoprazan safety were evaluated after 2 weeks of EVL.

RESULTS

Post-EVL ulcer bleeding occurred among 2.15% of vonoprazan, 8.7% of pantoprazole, and 14.2% of the non-acid suppression groups (P < 0.001). Post-ligation ulcer frequency and dimensions were higher among non-acid suppression and pantoprazole groups vs. vonoprazan (P < 0.05). Chest pain and odynophagia were encountered among 73.6% and 54.9% of the non-acid suppression group vs. 39.6% and 45.1% in pantoprazole, and 17.2% and 21.5% in vonoprazan groups, respectively (P < 0.05). There were no vonoprazan-related adverse events. Non-use of vonoprazan was the strongest independent predictor for post-EVL bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Short course of vonoprazan 20 mg/day is safe and superior to pantoprazole 40 mg/day in the reduction of post-EVL ulcer dimensions at 2 weeks post-EVL, and prevention of ulcer-related bleeding. Acid suppression is superior to no acid suppression to prevent post-EVL complications.

Keverprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker: Single ascending dose safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and food effect in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Keverprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker for the treatment of acid-related diseases.

AIMS

To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and food effect of single oral doses of keverprazan in healthy Chinese subjects.

METHODS

In the dose-escalated phase Ia trial, the first 8 subjects received keverprazan 5 mg, the others successively entered 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg groups and were randomized to receive keverprazan (n = 8), lansoprazole (LSZ) 30 mg (n = 2) or placebo (n = 2) in each dose group. The phase Ib study randomly enrolled subjects to the fasting-fed (n = 7) or fed-fasting (n = 7) groups for evaluating the food effect of keverprazan.

RESULTS

Twenty (35.71%) adverse events (AEs) occurred in phase Ia, including 13 (32.50%), 3 (37.50%), and 4 (50.00%) AEs in the keverprazan, placebo, and LSZ groups, respectively. Four (28.57%) AEs occurred in Phase Ib. The Tmax of keverprazan was 1.25-1.75 h. Cmax and AUC increased with the dose, and the t1/2, CL/F were 6.00-7.17 h, 88.8-198 L/h, respectively. The intragastric pH >5 holding-time ratio (HTR) increased with the dose but reached a ceiling at 20 mg. In the 30 mg LSZ and 5-60 mg keverprazan groups, the intragastric pH >5 HTRs during 24 h were 57.1%±26.4%, 7.9%±8.1%, 26.2%±22.8%, 80.2%±8.8%, 88.1%±8.6%, and 93.0%±1.7%, respectively. The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of Cmax and AUC0-∞ of keverprazan in plasma under the fed vs. fasting state were 126.8% (109.0%-147.5%) and 134.9% (123.8%-146.9%).

CONCLUSION

Keverprazan is tolerable, and provides significant stable and lasting inhibition efficacy of intragastric acidity at 20 mg.

Keverprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker: Multiple oral doses safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics in healthy subjects

Keverprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, was approved for treating acid-related diseases. This study aimed to analyze the safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of multiple doses of keverprazan. This was a randomized, positive-/placebo-controlled, phase Ic trial. Twenty-six healthy adults were randomized to receive 20 mg/day keverprazan (n = 8), 40 mg/day keverprazan (n = 8), placebo (n = 6), or 20 mg/day vonoprazan (n = 4) for 7 days. Safety, PK and PD assessments were conducted. In the keverprazan, vonoprazan, and placebo groups, adverse events (AEs) were reported in nine (56.25%), two (50.00%), and three (50.00%) subjects, respectively. AEs were mild except a moderate abdominal pain leading to withdraw. No serious AEs occurred. The plasma concentration-time profiles of keverprazan showed rapid absorption (median time to maximum plasma concentration of 1.25-3.0 h). The terminal half-life was 6.23 and 7.01 h for keverprazan 20 and 40 mg groups on day 7. The maximum plasma concentration was 43.1 and 93.2 ng/mL, respectively. There was no apparent accumulation of keverprazan and the major metabolite after 7-day administration. The intragastric pH greater than 5 holding time ratios (HTRs) over 24 h postdose increased from 79.1%, 84.4%, and 84.5% on day 1 to 99.0%, 97.4%, and 100.0% on day 7 in the vonoprazan 20 mg and keverprazan 20 and 40 mg groups, respectively. The intragastric pH greater than 5 HTR of keverprazan reached a plateau at 20 mg. Keverprazan is well-tolerable. A steady-state in exposure was generally reached after 7 days of treatment. A dose of 20 mg/day keverprazan can elicit a significant, stable, and long-lasting gastric acid inhibition effect.