Outcomes of Pulmonary Resection and Mediastinal Node Dissection by Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy for Stage IIIA N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Anatomic Lung Resection after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Lung Cancer: A Case-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

The advantages of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) are well-recognized in several studies. However, in the cases of advanced lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), the role of VATS is still questionable, with concerns about safety, technical feasibility, and oncological completeness. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of nCT on patients who had undergone uniportal VATS (U-VATS) anatomic lung resections for lung cancer, by comparing the short-term outcomes of patients after nCT with case-matched counterparts (treated by surgery alone).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, comparative study enrolling 927 patients (nCT: 60; non-nCT:867) who underwent U-VATS anatomic lung resections from 2014 to 2020 in two centers. Data were collected in a shared database with standardized variables' definition. Propensity score matching using 15 baseline preoperative patients' characteristics was performed in order to minimize selection-confounding factors between the two groups, which then were directly compared in terms of perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, two groups of 60 patients had been defined. The nCT-group had a higher conversion rate compared to the control group (13.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.003) without an increase in operation time or cardiopulmonary complications. In addition, no differences between the two groups were recorded in terms of prolonged air leaks, length of stay, and readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

U-VATS after nCT is a feasible approach, showing a similar rate of cardiopulmonary complications and length of stay when compared with the control group. However, it remains a challenging surgery due to its great technical complexity as well as the clinical status of the patients.

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Thoracotomy Following Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy in Resectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Among Chinese Populations: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment but may pose greater technical challenges for surgery. This study aims to assess the feasibility and oncological effectiveness of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for resectable stage III NSCLC after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

METHODS

Initial stage IIIA-IIIB NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy undergoing either VATS or open lobectomy at 6 medical centers during 2019-2023 were retrospectively identified. Perioperative outcomes and 2-year survival was analyzed. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was employed to balance patient baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Among the total 143 patients, PSM yielded 62 cases each for VATS and OPEN groups. Induction-related adverse events were comparable between the 2 groups. VATS showed a 14.5% conversion rate. Notably, VATS decreased numeric rating scales for postoperative pain, shortened chest tube duration (5[4-7] vs. 6[5-8] days, P = .021), reduced postoperative comorbidities (21.0% vs. 37.1%, P = .048), and dissected less N1 lymph nodes (5[4-6] vs. 7[5-9], P = .005) compared with thoracotomy. Even when converted, VATS achieves perioperative outcomes equivalent to thoracotomy. Additionally, over a median follow-up of 29.5 months, VATS and thoracotomy demonstrated comparable 2-year recurrence-free survival (77.20% vs. 73.73%, P = .640), overall survival (87.22% vs. 88.00%, P = .738), cumulative incidences of cancer-related death, and recurrence patterns. Subsequent subgroup comparisons and multivariate Cox analysis likewise revealed no statistical difference between VATS and thoracotomy.

CONCLUSION

VATS is a viable and effective option for resectable stage III NSCLC patients following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, leading to decreased surgical-related pain, earlier chest tube removal, reduced postoperative complications, and similar survival outcomes compared to thoracotomy.

A Systematic Review of Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Cancer after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgeries for non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries (VATSs) and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries (RATSs) have become standard of care for patients needing surgical resection in early stages. The role for neoadjuvant systemic therapy has increased with patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy. However, there has been some equipoise over the intraoperative and overall outcomes for these patients. Here, we review the current data regarding outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgical resection after systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or both.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies presenting data on patients with NSCLC that underwent neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by minimally invasive surgery was performed assessing complications, conversion rates, and lymph node yield.

RESULTS

Our search strategy and review of references resulted in 239 publications to screen with 88 full texts assessed and 21 studies included in our final review. VATS had a statistically significant higher lymph node yield in five studies. The reported conversion rates ranged from 0 to 54%. Dense adhesions, bleeding, and difficult anatomy were the most common reported reasons for conversion to open surgeries. The most common complications between both groups were prolonged air leak, arrythmia, and pneumonia. VATS was found to have significantly fewer complications in three papers.

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature supports VATS as safe and feasible for patients with NSCLC after neoadjuvant systemic treatment. Surgeons should remain prepared to convert to open surgeries in those patients with dense adhesions and bleeding risk.

Minimally invasive surgery vs. open thoracotomy for non-small-cell lung cancer with N2 disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive surgery [MIS, including robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)] and open thoracotomy (OT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with N2 disease.

Methods

We searched online databases and studies from the creation of the database to August 2022, comparing the MIS group to the OT group for NSCLC with N2 disease. Study endpoints included intraoperative outcomes [e.g., conversion, estimated blood loss (EBL), surgery time (ST), total lymph nodes (TLN), and R0 resection], postoperative outcomes [e.g., length of stay (LOS) and complication], and survival outcomes [e.g., 30-day mortality, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS)]. We estimated outcomes using random effects meta-analysis to account for studies with high heterogeneity (I² > 50 or p < 0.05). Otherwise, we used a fixed-effect model. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for binary outcomes and standard mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes. Treatment effects on OS and DFS were described by hazard ratio (HR).

Results

This systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 studies on MIS vs. OT for NSCLC with N2 disease included 8,374 patients. Compared to OT, patients that underwent MIS had less estimated blood loss (EBL) (SMD = - 64.82, p < 0.01), shorter length of stay (LOS) (SMD = -0.15, p < 0.01), higher R0 resection rate (OR = 1.22, p = 0.049), lower 30-day mortality (OR = 0.67, p = 0.03), and longer overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.61, P < 0.01). The results showed no statistically significant differences in surgical time (ST), total lymph nodes (TLN), complications, and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups.

Conclusion

Current data suggest that minimally invasive surgery may provide satisfying outcomes, a higher R0 resection rate, and better short-term and long-term survival than open thoracotomy.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022355712.

VATS versus Open Lobectomy following Induction Therapy for Stage III NSCLC: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of thoracoscopic lobectomy for advanced stage III NSCLC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 205 consecutive patients who underwent VATS or open lobectomy for clinical stage III lung cancer between January 2013 and December 2020. The perioperative and oncologic outcomes of the two approaches were compared. Long-term survival was assessed using the Kaplan−Meier estimator. Propensity score-matched (PSM) comparisons were used to obtain a well-balanced cohort of patients undergoing VATS and open lobectomy. Results: VATS lobectomy was performed in 77 (37.6%) patients and open lobectomy in 128 (62.4%) patients. Twelve patients (15.6%) converted from VATS to the open approach. PSM resulted in 64 cases in each group, which were well matched according to twelve potential prognostic factors, including tumor size, histology, and pTNM stage. Between the VATS and the open group, there were no significant differences in unmatched and matched analyses, respectively, of the overall postoperative complications (p = 0.138 vs. p = 0.109), chest tube duration (p = 0.311 vs. p = 0.106), or 30-day mortality (p = 1 vs. p = 1). However, VATS was associated with shorter hospital stays (p < 0.0001). The five-year overall survival (OS) and five-year Recurrence-free survival (RFS) were comparable between the VATS and the open groups. There was no significant difference in the recurrence pattern between the two groups in both the unmatched and matched analyses. Conclusion: For the advanced stage III NSCLC, VATS lobectomy achieved equivalent postoperative and oncologic outcomes when compared with open lobectomy without increasing the risk of procedure-related locoregional recurrence.

Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery comparable with thoracotomy in perioperative and long-term survival outcomes for non-small-cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant treatment?

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery comparable with thoracotomy in perioperative and long-term survival outcomes for patients with non-small cell lung cancer following neoadjuvant therapy intended for anatomical lung resection?'. Altogether 655 papers were found using the reported search, of which 12 studies represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type and relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Almost all of the enrolled cohort studies reported that video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was comparable with thoracotomy in negative surgical margin rate, postoperative mortality, complication rate, overall survival and disease-free survival. Moreover, 7 studies found patients in the VATS group had a significantly shorter hospital stay. Furthermore, in these well-matched cohort studies (6 studies), it still held true that VATS was comparable with thoracotomy in long-term prognosis with enhanced recovery. However, the issue regarding surgical radicality and intraoperative conversion to thoracotomy still should be noted carefully among these patients receiving VATS surgery because all the current available evidence was retrospective based on relatively small sample sizes. Nevertheless, thoracic surgeons should not consider VATS inferior to thoracotomy for patients after neoadjuvant treatment. VATS surgery could be an alternative for selected patients with locally advanced but relatively small, peripheral, fewer positive N2 lymph nodes and non-squamous NSCLC intended for anatomic lung resection.

Thoracoscopic Versus Open Lobectomy After Induction Therapy for Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: New Study Results and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy has become a mainstay of modern thoracic surgery practice and the technique of choice for resection of early-stage lung cancers. However, the benefits of VATS following induction therapy are yet to be clarified. This study aims to assess whether VATS lobectomy achieves similar perioperative and oncologic outcomes compared to thoracotomy for nonsmall cell lung cancer after induction therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 72 patients who underwent lung lobectomy after induction therapy in our institution from January 2017 to January 2020. Subsequently, we carried out a comprehensive literature search and pooled our results with available data from previously published studies to perform a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

VATS was associated with reduced intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.05) and less perioperative complications (P = 0.04) in our local institution. The meta-analysis comprised nine studies. A total of 943 patients underwent VATS and 2827 patients underwent open lobectomy. VATS was associated with significant shorter surgery duration (P < 0.0001), shorter chest-tube drainage duration (P < 0.0001), and shorter hospital stays (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, there was significantly less perioperative complications (P = 0.006) and less intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.036) in the VATS group. However, there were no significant differences in 3-y overall survival and 3-y disease-free survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

In some selected patients undergoing induction therapy, VATS lobectomy could achieve equivalent perioperative outcomes to thoracotomy but evidence is lacking on oncologic outcomes. Further trials with a focus on oncologic outcomes and longer follow-up are required.

Current Status of Lung Cancer and Surgery Based on Studies Using a Nationwide Database

Lung cancer is a fatal disease, highlighting the importance of research on related topics, including surgery for lung cancer. However, systematic research analyzing surgery on a national scale is limited. This study aimed to investigate the research on lung cancer using nationwide data in South Korea and to analyze trends in lung cancer surgery, including its clinical implications. Published articles and data from the Korean National Health Insurance database were used. Although the incidence and mortality of lung cancer have been improving, it is predicted to be the most common and fatal type of cancer in South Korea in 2021. The number of surgical procedures for lung cancer is increasing, especially among women, those ≥76 years of age, residents of non-metropolitan cities, and middle-income patients. Lobectomy and sublobectomy, including segmentectomy, are increasingly common. However, the proportion of pneumonectomy relative to other procedures is not increasing. Surgery has shown a reasonable survival rate, especially after lobectomy, but survival remains poor in patients ≥76 years of age who undergo pneumonectomy. The frequency of lung cancer surgery is increasing concomitantly with various socioeconomic changes. Lobectomy has become increasingly common, and the clinical results of surgery are satisfactory. Further research on the changing composition of surgical candidates is required.

Minimally invasive surgery versus thoracotomy for resectable stage II and III non-small-cell lung cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to compare the long-term oncological efficacy and perioperative outcomes of patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancers who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or thoracotomy.

METHODS

Cochrane Library, PubMed and EMBASE databases, ClinicalTrials.gov and reference lists were searched for relevant studies. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the studies. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes were synthesized. Random-effects models were used to summarize hazard ratios (HRs), relative risks and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Twenty-three retrospective cohort studies were reviewed with a total of 3281 patients, of whom 1376 (41.9%) received MIS and 1905 (58.1%) received thoracotomy. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences in both RFS (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.89-1.17; P = 0.78) and OS (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.80-1.03; P = 0.15) between MIS versus thoracotomy approaches. Similar results were observed in propensity score matched studies (RFS, HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.73-1.20; P = 0.62; OS, HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.72-1.30; P = 0.81). No significant difference was found in lymph node clearance and margin positivity. As for perioperative outcomes, MIS was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative complications (relative risk, 0.83; P = 0.01), intraoperative blood loss (standardized mean difference, -0.68; P = 0.007), chest tube drainage (standardized mean difference, -0.38; P = 0.03) and length of hospital stay (standardized mean difference, -0.79; P = 0.002) when compared with thoracotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MIS for resectable stage II and III non-small-cell lung cancers is an eligible alternative to conventional thoracotomy without compromising the long-term survival and short-term outcomes.

Results of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy in surgical resection of pN2 non-small cell lung cancer in a Chinese high-volume Center

PURPOSE

To investigate the short-term outcomes and long-term oncological efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for surgical treatment of pN2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with open thoracotomy (OT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 1034 patients who underwent pulmonary resection and systemic lymph node dissection for pathological N2 NSCLC from September 2005 to December 2017 (536 patients in VATS group and 498 patients in OT group). Propensity score matching was applied to reduce the confounding effects. Factors affecting survival were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The VATS procedure was associated with shorter operative time compared with the OT procedure (147.96 ± 58.91 min vs. 165.34 ± 58.91 min, P < 0.001). No significant difference was identified between the two groups in the number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs) and number of dissected MLNs stations. More patients after VATS procedure received postoperative adjuvant therapy (83.4% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.002). At a median follow-up of 36 (range 4-150) months, comparing VATS procedure and OT procedure, no significant differences were noted in 5-year DFS (20.7% vs. 22.5%, P = 0.89) and 5-year OS (30.7% vs. 34.5%, P = 0.821). The VATS procedure was not found to be an independent predictor of DFS (hazard ratio, 0.986; 95% CI, 0.809 to 1.202) or OS (hazard ratio, 0.977; 95% CI 0.802 to 1.191).

CONCLUSION

In this large propensity-matched comparison, the VATS procedure offered comparable short-term outcomes and long-term oncological efficacy for patients with pN2 NSCLC when compared with OT procedure.

Clinical Outcomes And Cost-Effectiveness Of Different Staplers For Lung Lobectomy With Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare intra-operative adverse events (AE), post-operative outcomes, and costs of three different types of Echelon staplers (manual activated SC45A and electrical power-activated PSE45A & PSEE60A) used during video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for lung lobectomy.

Patients and methods

We carried out a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing VATS lobectomies using one of three staplers (SC45A, PSE45A, or PSEE60A) during a 2-year period at our institution. We compared intra-operative AEs, post-operative outcomes (drainage volume, chest tube duration, prolonged air leaks [PALs]), endoscopic product costs [ECs], and hospitalization costs [HCs]) amongst the three stapler groups.

Results

In all 204 peripheral lung cancer patients were included in the study (95 in the SC45A group, 72 in the PSE45A group, and 37 in the PSEE60A group). We observed intra-operative AEs in 6 patients of the SC45A group, in 4 of the PSE45A group, and in 1 of the PSEE60A group (P>0.05). Drainage volumes among the three groups were similar. The mean chest tube duration was shorter]st in the PSE45A group followed by those in the PSEE60A and SC45A groups (P<0.05). PALs were lowest in the PSE45A group and highest in the SC45A group (P<0.05). The mean EC in the PSEE60A group was significantly higher than those in the other two groups (P<0.05). We found no statistically significant differences in terms of HCs among groups.

Conclusion

The three endoscopic staplers had similar incidences of intra-operative AEs when used for lobectomy with VATS. Use of the PSE45A stapler was associated with the shortest chest tube duration and least PALs, while use of the PSEE60A resulted in the highest EC rate.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopy major lung resections after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background

The combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery in lung cancer therapy is well established. The role of uniportal video assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) is still not described in literature. This study presents the preliminary short-term results of uniportal VATS after neoadjuvant therapy in our series.

Methods

The prospectively collected data of 154 patients after uniportal VATS anatomical lung resection (18 patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 136 surgeries alone) were retrospectively reviewed. The perioperative results and follow-up of patients after neoadjuvant therapy were analyzed and compared to those after surgery alone.

Results

The mean age of population was 67.51±10.63 years. The mean operative time was overlapping in both groups: 248.97±118.17 min in surgery group and 287.17±94.13 min in chemotherapy + surgery group (P=0.190), with no difference in terms of types of anatomical lung resections performed and number of lymph nodes retrieved. The intraoperative mortality was null in both groups. The incidence of all complications was the same in both groups and no correlations was found with any possible risk factor evaluated (age, gender, comorbidities, type of resection, histology, etc.). Among minor complications, the incidence of parenchymal fistula was significantly higher in the 18 patients underwent chemotherapy (22.2% vs. 5.1% respectively, P=0.013). The overall survival of the series was 93% at 1 year follow-up and 88% at 5-year. The 1- and 2-year survival in only surgery group was 94% and 89% respectively vs. 85% and 85% in Chemotherapy + surgery, without any significant difference (P=0.324).

Conclusions

According to our experience, uniportal VATS after neoadjuvant therapy is feasible and quite safe. The oncological results and postoperative complications are comparable to those of other techniques. Uniportal VATS can be performed even for complicated cases in experienced centers.