Early stent thrombosis. Aetiology, treatment, and prognosis

High platelet reactivity strongly predicts early stent thrombosis in patients with drug-eluting stent implantation

Stent thrombosis (ST) is a fatal complication after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The association between P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) level and stent thrombosis occurrence remains unclear. Based on the multicenter, observational PTRG-DES (Platelet function and genoType-Related long-term proGnosis in DES-treated patients) registry of patients with drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation, a total of 11,714 patients with PRU values were analyzed. We sought to identify the predictors of early stent thrombosis (EST) and compared the primary outcome, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization, between EST and non-EST groups. EST, defined as definite ST within 1 month after index PCI, occurred in 51 patients. PRU values were significantly higher in the EST group (263.5 ± 70.8 vs. 217.5 ± 78.7, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, PRU ≥ 252 (OR, 5.10; 95% CI 1.58-16.46; p = 0.006) and aspirin reaction unit ≥ 414 (OR 4.85; 95% CI 1.07-21.97; p = 0.040) were independent predictors of EST. The cumulative incidence of primary composite outcome at one year was significantly higher in the EST group (38.2% vs. 3.9%, Log-rank p < 0.001). In patients treated with clopidogrel after successful DES implantation, EST was associated with higher platelet reactivities, and a greater risk of cardiovascular events.Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04734028.

Factors Impacting Stent Thrombosis in Patients With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Stent thrombosis (ST) is a frequently reported complication in cardiac patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) that adversely impacts their prognostic outcomes. Medical literature reveals several baseline characteristics of PCI patients that may predict their predisposition to ST and its potential complications. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the diagnostic significance of these baseline parameters in terms of determining the risk of ST among adult patients with PCI. 

We statistically evaluated 18 baseline characteristics of more than 15,500 PCI patients to delineate their stent thrombosis attribution. We included a number of articles focusing on baseline parameters in-stent thrombosis-related PCI scenarios. We explored the articles of interest based on inclusion/exclusion parameters across PubMed, JSTOR, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and Embase. Medical subject headings (MeSH) words included “stent thrombosis,” “percutaneous coronary intervention,” and “coronary stenting.” We extracted the research articles published between 2005 and 2021 on April 20, 2021. The included studies also focused on procedures and clinical factors concerning their association with PCI-related ST.

Our findings ruled out the progression of abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)-related stent thrombosis in PCI patients (odds ratio {OR}: 9.68, 95% CI: 1.88-49.90, p=0.007). We found an insignificant clinical correlation between stent thrombosis and PCI in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Our study outcomes further revealed the absence of stent thrombosis in PCI patients with antiplatelet prescription (OR: 32.42, 95% CI: 21.28-49.39). The findings affirmed the absence of ST in PCI patients receiving aspirin therapy (OR: 32.77, 95% CI: 18.73-57.34; OR: 4.59, 95% CI: 1.97-10.73). The majority of the included studies negated the clinical correlation of stent thrombosis with diabetes mellitus in the setting of PCI (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.06-3.78). Our study did not reveal statistically significant results based on stent thrombosis in PCI patients with drug-eluting stents (OR: 2.91, 95% CI: 0.35-24.49). The findings also did not reveal the impact of cardiac biomarker elevation on stent thrombosis in PCI patients (OR: 8.42, 95% CI: 2.54-27.98, p=0.0005). Eight studies revealed a statistically insignificant correlation between myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis in PCI scenarios (OR: 2.69, 95% CI: 0.89-8.11, p=0.08). The clinical correlation between PCI and stent thrombosis/major bleeding in the setting of hypertension also proved statistically insignificant at 0.67 (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.38-4.51, p=0.97). The study findings did not correlate mean body mass index and multivessel coronary artery disease with ST in PCI scenarios (OR: 1.98, 95% CI: 0.02-239.58, p=0.78; OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.58-2.04, p=0.80). Only two studies revealed statistically significant results confirming stent thrombosis in PCI patients with a prior history of PCI (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.23-1.06; OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.02-5.59; p=0.03).

Our findings question the clinical significance of baseline characteristics in terms of predicting stent thrombosis in PCI patients. The results support the requirement of future studies to investigate complex interactions between procedural, medicinal, genetic, and patient-related factors contributing to the development of stent thrombosis in PCI patients. 

[Comorbidity and Gender of Patients at Risk of Hospital Mortality After Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention]

Aim        To study gender aspects of comorbidity in evaluating the risk of in-hospital death for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Material and methods        The presented results are based on data of two ACS registries, the city of Sochi and RECORD-3. 986 patients were included into this analysis by two additional criteria, age &lt;70 years and PCI. 80% of the sample were men. Analysis of comorbidity severity was performed for all patients and included 9 indexes: type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, anemia, stroke, arterial hypertension, obesity, and peripheral atherosclerosis. Group 1 (minimum comorbidity) consisted of patients with not more than one disease (n=367); group 2 (moderate comorbidity) consisted of patients with 2 or 3 diseases (n=499), and group 3 (pronounced comorbidity) consisted of patients with 4 or more diseases (n=120). In-hospital mortality was 2.7 % (n=27).Results   Significant data on the effect of comorbidity on the in-hospital prognosis were obtained only for men of the compared groups: 0.6, 1.8, and 8.8 %, respectively (χ2=21.6; р&lt;0.0001). At the same time, among 44 women with minimum comorbidity, there were no cases of in-hospital death, and the presence of moderate (n=110) and pronounced comorbidity (n=40) was associated with a similar death rate (7.3 and 7.5 %, respectively). Noteworthy, in moderate comorbidity, the female gender was associated with a 4-fold increase in the risk of in-hospital death (odd ratio, OR 4.3 at 95 % confidence interval, CI from 1.5 to 12.1; р=0.003). In addition, both in men and women with minimum comorbidity, even a high risk by the GRACE scale (score ≥140) was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality, which was minimal (0 for women and 1 % for men). At the same time, in the patient subgroup with moderate and pronounced comorbidity, a GRACE score ≥140 resulted in a 6-fold increase in the risk of in-hospital death for men (OR 6.0 at 95 % CI from 1.7 to 21.9; р=0.002) and a 16-fold increase for women (OR 16.2 at 95 % CI from 2.0 to 130.4; р=0.0006).Conclusion            This study identified gender-related features in predicting the risk of in-hospital death for ACS patients with comorbidities after PCI, which warrants reconsideration of existing approaches to risk stratification.

One-Month Outcomes of Cases Receiving Ticagrelor after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; a Case Series

INTRODUCTION

Ticagrelor is the first reversibly binding oral P2Y12 receptor antagonist that can block ADP-induced platelet aggregation. This study aimed to describe one-month follow-up findings of cases undergoing ticagrelor therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

This case series was performed on acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who were candidates for PCI and received aspirin plus ticagrelor after PCI. Patients were followed for one month and their outcomes were described.

RESULTS

156 cases with the mean age of 59.74 ± 9.24 years were studied (63% male). 45 (28.8%) cases complained of dyspnea (39 cases with mild and 6 cases with severe dyspnea). Bleeding occurred in 4 (2.5%) cases (intra-cranial hemorrhage (ICH) in one, hematuria in two, and skin hemorrhage in one case). There were no cases with bradycardia or thrombosis. One (0.6%) patient developed drug hypersensitivity reaction, which manifested as skin rash. The use of drug was stopped in 10 (6.4%) cases due to severe dyspnea (n= 6), ICH (n=1), skin rash (n=1), and concomitant left ventricular (LV) clot (n=2).

CONCLUSION

The most important finding of one-month ticagrelor consumption were dyspnea, bleeding, and hypersensitivity reaction. No case of bradycardia and stent thrombosis was detected. In our study , iranian population has more susceptibility to dyspnea than PLATO result. The rate of drug discontinuation in this series of cases was 6.4 %.

Acute adrenal insufficiency as a mysterious cause of shock following percutaneous coronary intervention: a cardiologist's nightmare

The differential diagnosis of shock following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is vast. Access site complications and bleeding can cause hypovolemic shock. Peri-procedural myocardial infarction, abrupt closure, stent thrombosis, coronary dissection and coronary perforation have a stormy presentation. Vasovagal shock is manifested by bradycardia and hypotension and quickly responds to atropine. Anaphylactic shock secondary to contrast administration can be stormy but usually responds to steroids or adrenaline. Septicemia due to unsterile techniques can cause a less dramatic shock. Acute adrenal insufficiency causing shock following PCI has not been described to the best of our knowledge. We report the case of a 54-year-old woman who underwent successful multivessel PCI. She had refractory unexplained shock following the PCI with no much response from inotropic or intra-aortic balloon pump. After ruling out all possible causes of shock and clinical suspicion of adrenal insufficiency, she was treated with steroids resulting in dramatic improvement in her hemodynamics.

Association of the CHA2DS2VASc Score with Acute Stent Thrombosis in Patients with an ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Who Underwent a Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to determine the predictive value of the CHA2DS2VASc score for acute stent thrombosis in patients with an ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study conducted among 3,460 consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent a pPCI. The stent thrombosis was considered a definite or confirmed event in the presence of symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome and angiographic confirmation of stent thrombosis based on the diagnostic guidelines of the Academic Research Consortium. The stent thrombosis was classified as acute if it developed within 24 h.

RESULTS

The mean CHA2DS2VASc score was 3.29 ± 1.73 in the stent thrombosis group, whereas it was 2.06 ± 1.14 in the control group (p < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, CHA2DS2VASc scores ≥ 4 were independently associat ed with acute stent thrombosis (OR = 1.64; 95% CI 1.54-1.71, p < 0.001). In a receiver operating characteristic curve ana-lysis, the best cut-off value for the CHA2DS2VASc score was ≥4, with 60% sensitivity and 73% specificity. Of note, pa tients with a CHA2DS2VASc score of 4 had a 4.3 times higher risk of acute stent thrombosis compared to those with a CHA2DS2VASc score of 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The CHA2DS2VASc score may be a significant independent predictor of acute stent thrombosis in patients with STEMI treated with a pPCI. Therefore, the CHA2DS2VASc score may be used to assess the risk of acute stent thrombosis in patients with STEMI following a pPCI.

Predictors of Impaired Reperfusion after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with In-Hospital Acute Stent Thrombosis: A Retrospective Analyses of 5 Years of Data

BACKGROUND

Acute stent thrombosis (STh) is a rare complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and is associated with a high-risk of reperfusion failure. However, data focusing on risk factors of reperfusion failure in patients undergoing repeat PCI for treatment of STh remains inadequate.

METHODS

A total of 8815 patients who underwent PCI with stent implantation from January 2009 to December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Among those cases, patients that presented with acute STh and underwent a repeat PCI for acute STh were identified.

RESULTS

There were 108 patients who underwent repeat PCI for the treatment of in-hospital acute STh that were retrospectively analyzed. Of these study subjects, 21 (25%) had thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow < 3 after repeat PCI. The median value of pain-to-balloon time was 40 minutes in the TIMI < 3 group, 35 minutes in the TIMI = 3 group (p < 0.001), and the first PCI-to-stent thrombosis time was also longer in the TIMI < 3 group (10 hours vs. 2.5 hours, p = 0.001). When patients were evaluated according to PCI time, the percentage of patients with TIMI < 3 was significantly higher in the night period compared to the daytime period (46.4% vs. 17.5 %, p = 0.002). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, stent length [odds ratio (OR) = 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.008-1.38] and pain-to- balloon time (OR = 1.28, 95% CI, 1.06-1.54) were the only independent predictors of failed reperfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline stent length and pain-to-balloon time were associated with reperfusion failure in PCI for STh. Moreover, TIMI flow grade showed a circadian variation.

Early occlusion of the non-infarct-related coronary artery following successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction

We present a clinical case of early occlusion of the non-infarct-related artery (non-IRA) in a patient with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Several hours after successful percutaneous treatment of the occluded right coronary artery the patient developed a second myocardial infarction, which was caused by acute occlusion of the left anterior descending artery, which had a significant lesion in the proximal segment. The lesion was diagnosed during the first catheterization, but was left untreated. We discuss the potential advantages and risks associated with the ad-hoc multivessel PCI strategy in STEMI.