Laparoscopy in small bowel obstruction - current status - review

Post-appendectomy Adhesive Small Intestine Obstruction With Gangrene: A Sinister Case

Intestinal adhesions are fibrotic bands of scar tissue that develop intra-abdominally due to serosal or peritoneal irritation caused during surgery or by severe infections. It may also occur congenitally. It can lead to serious complications such as small bowel obstruction, which is then termed adhesive small bowel obstruction. In this scenario, it can constrict the bowel wall and cause ischemia and necrosis of the affected intestinal segment. Computed tomography imaging may show characteristic signs, such as the "whirl sign" or "fat-bridging sign." Diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy can confirm the diagnosis and presence of adhesions. Management of this condition is either conservative or surgical, the latter of which is necessary in the case of intestinal strangulation. While the literature supports the laparoscopic method of adhesiolysis, practically, it may present technical difficulties. Surgeons should employ their clinical judgment in cases where an open procedure may be more beneficial. We present a case of this very occurrence and discuss the risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnostic evaluation, and, finally, the approaches to surgical management of this condition.

Laparotomy with suture repair is the most common treatment for obturator hernia: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Obturator hernias are rare and associated with high mortality. However, the optimal surgical approach remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the available evidence and examine the surgical details regarding obturator hernia defect closure as well as the recurrence rates of the different approaches.

METHODS

We reported this scoping review according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews) and registered the protocol online. A comprehensive literature search in five different databases was conducted. The population was patients undergoing surgery for obturator hernia. Articles were included for data charting if the management of the hernia defect was reported. Data regarding surgical details, and hernia recurrence were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 1299 patients from 313 articles were included. In total, 937 patients underwent open obturator hernia repair, in which 992 hernias were repaired (including some bilateral obturator hernias). A total of 295 patients underwent laparoscopic repair for 341 obturator hernias, and for the remaining 67 patients, type of surgery was not reported. For open surgery, suture repair was the most common method of repair (n = 508, 51%) with a recurrence rate of 10%. For laparoscopic surgery, the most common repair of the defect was mesh repair (n = 299, 88%) with no reported recurrences.

CONCLUSION

Open surgery with primary suture repair is the most common method of repair for obturator hernia but is associated with a recurrence rate of 10%. Laparoscopic mesh repair is becoming more common and have seemingly very low recurrence rates and may be a better method of repair.

Herniation Through Defects in the Broad Ligament

Background

We sought to assess hernia characteristics and classification through comprehensive review of the literature involving broad ligament herniation.

Methods

A literature search via MEDLINE and Embase databases was conducted to identify and select broad ligament herniation studies published between January 1, 2000 and September 30, 2020. Extracted data included previous surgical history, previous obstetric history, diagnostic imaging, herniated organ, hernia classification, and repair performed. The reported data has been compared to a unique case of broad ligament herniation that presented to our institution.

Results

A total of 44 articles with 49 cases were identified for the study. Eighteen (36.7%) patients had a history of previous abdominal surgery while 29 (59.2%) had a history of previous childbirth. Type I (51.0%) and Type II (18.4%) defects were most commonly reported with most patients reporting only one defect (85.7%) using the Cilley classification. Twenty-nine patients underwent primary laparoscopic repair of the defect while 19 patients underwent exploratory laparotomy.

Conclusions

The analysis of previously reported cases adds to the limited literature on broad ligament hernias and highlights the surgical management of this uncommon pathology. It also highlights the need for a broad differential diagnosis when female patients present with pelvic pain or symptoms of small bowel obstruction. The broad ligament should be fully inspected when mesenteric defects are suspected as multiple defects can be present as evidenced by the attached case study.

Preperitoneal herniation as a complication of tansabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty: a report of two cases

BACKGROUND

Preperitoneal herniation is a rare complication after transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) and may be caused by inadequate peritoneal closure. We herein report two cases of postoperative small bowel obstruction due to preperitoneal herniation through a disrupted peritoneum.

CASE PRESENTATION

Two men in their 70s were admitted to our center because of small bowel obstruction after TAPP. After examinations and unsuccessful conservative treatment, emergency laparoscopic exploration was performed. Preperitoneal herniation through the disrupted peritoneum was found. The herniated small bowel was reduced and the peritoneum was properly reclosed. The patients recovered and were discharged with normal bowel function.

CONCLUSIONS

Inadequate peritoneal closure may cause preperitoneal herniation and lead to postoperative small bowel obstruction and even death. Hernia surgeons can avoid this complication by improving their suture technique and paying attention to the procedure details.

Does Laparoscopic Adhesiolysis Reduce the Risk of Small Bowel Obstruction Related Readmissions and Reoperations Compared to Open Adhesiolysis?

Purpose

The present study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in decreasing recurrent episodes of small bowel obstruction (SBO) compared to that of the conventional open procedure.

Methods

Among 373 patients who visited our emergency department from January 2000 to July 2018 due to small bowel obstruction, 67 patients who underwent adhesiolysis were included in this study. Eighteen and 49 patients comprised the open adhesiolysis (OA) and laparoscopic adhesiolysis (LA) groups, respectively. Clinical demographics, computed tomography (CT) findings, laboratory results, and perioperative outcomes were compared. Further, the long-term follow-ups of SBO related re-admissions and re-operations were also compared.

Results

Preoperative baseline data, pain characteristics, laboratory findings, and ileus-related CT findings showed no significant difference between the two groups. LA was related to less blood loss and complications, along with early bowel movement recovery. Similarly, fewer SBO-related re-admissions [OA vs. LA=8 (44.4%) vs. 3 (6.1%), p=0.001] and re-operations [OA vs. LA=3 (16.7%) vs. 1 (2.0%), p=0.025] were observed in LA compared to OA.

Conclusion

LA is a safer and more feasible procedure for SBO treatment compared to OA. This procedure showed a reduction in SBO-related re-admission and re-operation rates.

Evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for small bowel obstruction and factors related to outcomes

Introduction

In recent years, laparoscopic surgery (LS) has been performed for small bowel obstruction (SBO). However, the indications and short-term and long-term outcomes of LS for SBO have not yet been established.

Aim

To evaluate the usefulness of LS for SBO compared to open surgery (OS), as well as to identify risk factors for poor outcomes after LS.

Material and methods

A total of 105 patients who underwent surgery for SBO were divided into OS (n = 64) and LS (n = 41) groups, and propensity score-matched analysis was used to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of the groups. Risk factors for conversion to OS, postoperative complications, and intraoperative bowel injury in LS were also identified.

Results

The incidences of surgical site infection and postoperative ileus were significantly lower in the LS group. The incidence of recurrent bowel did not differ significantly between the two groups. Prior bowel obstruction was a risk factor for conversion of LS to OS (odds ratio (OR) = 24.79, p = 0.0025). Bowel diameter was a risk factor for postoperative complications (OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.01–2.22) and for bowel injury (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.05–1.67).

Conclusions

LS for SBO had better postoperative short-term outcomes than OS. The outcomes of LS for SBO were significantly affected by prior bowel obstruction and bowel diameter.