Treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: new recommendations based on the CLARINET study

China Anti-Cancer Association Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of thymic epithelial tumors (2023)

Background

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are a relatively rare type of thoracic tumors with higher incidence in Asians. The diagnosis and treatment pattern has long been based mainly on clinical experience and expert consensus. In recent years, with an increasing number of TETs detected in physical examinations, there is an urgent need to develop the guidelines that apply to the Chinese population. Thus, we intend to develop a holistic integrative guideline for TETs.

Methods

Under the leadership of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association (CACA) Mediastinal Tumor Committee, a multidisciplinary guideline development group was established. Systemic literature review and two rounds of questionnaires regarding key clinical issues were carried out. The grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations.

Results

The CACA guideline provides recommendations for the clinical differential diagnosis of anterior mediastinal lesions, management of asymptomatic small anterior mediastinal nodules, pathological classification and staging systems of TETs, as well as principles of surgery, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, systemic therapies for advanced TETs, and follow-up strategies after surgical resection.

Conclusions

This guideline provides holistic integrative management strategies for TETs and would be a useful tool for clinicians on decision-making.

Management of Ileal Neuroendocrine Tumors with Liver Metastases

PURPOSE

Assessment of treating metastatic ileal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with complete resection of primary tumor, nodal and liver metastases, plus administration of long-acting somatostatin analogues (SSAs).

METHODS

A prospective database was queried for patients with ileal or pancreatic NETs with pathology-confirmed liver metastases and tumor somatostatin receptors. Patients did not have MEN-1 and had no previous treatment. The impacts of SSA treatment on the primary outcome of survival and secondary outcome of progression-free survival were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Log rank test was used to compare overall and progression-free survival among groups.

RESULTS

Seventeen ileal NET patients and 36 pancreatic NET patients who underwent surgical resection between 2001 and 2018, who had pathology-confirmed liver metastases and confirmed tumor somatostatin receptors, did not have MEN-1, and had no previous treatment were identified. Median follow-up for patients with ileal NETs was 80 months (range 0-197 months) and 32 months (range 1-182 months) for pancreatic NETs. Five-year survival was 93% and 72% for ileal and pancreatic NET, respectively. Progression-free 5-year survival was 70% and 36% for ileal and pancreatic NET, respectively. Overall 5-year survival for pNETs was greater in those patients treated with SSA (79%) compared to those who underwent surgery alone (34%, p < 0.01). The average ECOG score was low for surviving patients with ileal (0.15) and pancreatic NET (0.73) indicating a good quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of primary lymph node and liver metastatic ileal or pancreatic NETs followed with continued SSAs is associated with an excellent progression-free and overall survival and minimal side effects.

Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Active Treatment with Placebo in Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Most guidelines still recommend active surveillance for patients with asymptomatic, unresectable neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, recent findings from several randomized placebo-controlled trials suggest that most patients would benefit from active treatment. We conducted a meta-analysis of pooled outcomes from clinical trials in which an active treatment arm was compared with placebo to determine whether active treatment provides a survival advantage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This meta-analysis evaluated six trials that compared a medication with placebo in patients with an asymptomatic, metastatic NET. The trials were heterogenous with regard to the active medication (octreotide, lanreotide, sunitinib, everolimus, Lu-Dotatate) and tumor localizations (gastrointestinal, pancreas, lung). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the placebo and active treatment arms were obtained from individual trial data and combined to obtain pooled outcomes.

RESULTS

The individual trials all reported significantly better PFS outcomes for active treatment. The pooled data confirmed this advantage. At months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24, pooled PFS rates for the placebo and treatment arms, respectively, were 92.9% versus 96.9%; 54.3% versus 83.7%; 35.5% versus 68.5%; 25.1% versus 54.7%; and 17.7% versus 61.0%. OS was also higher in the active treatment groups. At months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60, OS rates (placebo vs. active treatment), respectively, were 88.1% versus 93.4%; 84.1% versus 86.2%; 67.4% versus 76%; 56.6% versus 64.4%; 49.9% versus 61.0%; and 41.7% versus 45.9%.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirms findings from recent clinical trials indicating that active treatment yields better survival outcomes than placebo. Importantly, these findings were obtained across a wide range of patient profiles and diverse medical treatments for metastatic NETs. Given the lack of reliable prognostic factors to determine a priori which patients are unlikely to benefit from active treatment, these findings support early treatment in most patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Although most guidelines still recommend active surveillance for patients diagnosed with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, the results of this meta-analysis, together with recent data from key clinical trials, suggest that most patients could benefit from upfront active treatment. However, more data are needed to confirm this.

LARGE CELL METASTATIC PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE CARCINOMA TREATED WITH SOMATOSTATIN ANALOGUES - CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW

We report the case of a 55-year-old-male with a large cell metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma treated for 14 months with lanreotide autogel having a stable disease (SD) and not responding to chemotherapy. The somatostatin analogues (SSA) were introduced after an episode of diarrhea and controlled the disease. Progression-free survival (PFS) as determined by Computerized Tomography (CT) scans was obtained for 14 months. After more than a year, the patient's health state deteriorated along with progressive disease. The capecitabine-temozolomide regimen was challenged, but after three cycles, a rapid clinical decline was noted.

CONCLUSION

This unexpected event (diarrhea) in the course of the disease could represent the beginning of carcinoid syndrome. While the lanreotide autogel helped the episode of diarrhea pass, it also helped gain control over the disease itself.

Carcinoid tumour of the oesophagus: a systematic review

Introduction

Knowledge about oesophageal carcinoids is based primarily on case reports, and therefore information about them is incomplete.

Aim

To collect information on oesophageal carcinoid tumours in a systematic review study.

Material and methods

Databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for the characteristics of oesophageal carcinoid tumour. Studies included original articles, case series, or case reports, reporting at least one of the characteristics of benign carcinoid tumour or carcinoid tumour.

Results

Out of 670 studies searched, after evaluation and excluding non-relevant studies, 14 studies were included and analysed in the systematic review. These studies included 19 patients with carcinoid tumour of whom 57.9% were males with a mean age of 55.5 years. Dysphagia and weight loss were the most prevalent symptoms and signs in the patients. Lower oesophagus was the most prevalent site of tumour.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis showed that the mean age at diagnosis of oesophageal carcinoid was around 55 years, with 1.4 times greater prevalence among males, and located mainly in the distal oesophagus. The mean tumour size was 2.4 cm. The main symptoms and signs of this disease were dysphagia, weight loss, and reflux. The tumour behaviour was mainly non-aggressive except for cases associated with adenocarcinoma.

Soft Tissue Primary Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Case Report

BACKGROUND Neuroendocrine tumors found in skin or soft tissues usually represent metastasis from other organs and are considered late manifestations of disease. Therefore, primary cutaneous and soft tissue neuroendocrine tumors are extremely rare. CASE REPORT We report a case of a 48-year-old male with a neuroendocrine tumor occurring in the subcutaneous abdominal fat, which had an echographic appearance of a vascular malformation. The finding was diagnosed as compatible with neuroendocrine tumor based on histopathological and immunohistochemical studies. No other sites of possible internal origin were detected on supplementary investigations. CONCLUSIONS Soft tissue neuroendocrine tumors may have an appearance on imaging studies that challenge physicians to make a correct diagnosis. Despite the rarity of these tumors, they should be included in the differential diagnosis of other soft tissue masses.

Downgrading of a G3 Neuroendocrine Tumor to a G2 Tumor: Can First-Line Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Change the Tumor Biology?

The antiproliferative treatment options for neuroendocrine tumors (NET)/neuroendocrine carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract critically depend on the proliferation rate, evaluated by immunohistochemical staining for Ki-67. According to their grading, tumors are treated with somatostatin analogs, mTOR inhibitors, or cytotoxic substances. This case illustrates downgrading of a primarily highly proliferative NET achieved by a variation of cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, followed by a combination therapy using everolimus together with lanreotide. The latter medication might lead to a good clinical response as far as tumor growth is concerned.

Hindgut neuroendocrine neoplasms - characteristics and prognosis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to analyze the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of hindgut-rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 38 patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors who were treated at the Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland from February 2010 to December 2015. The clinicopathological data were retrospectively reviewed, extracted, analyzed, and patients were followed up to determine their survival status. Follow-up data were available for all 38 patients. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the prognostic factors significantly associated with overall survival.

RESULTS

The tumors occurred mostly in the middle and lower rectum, and the most typical symptoms experienced by patients were hematochezia and diarrhea. The median distance between the tumors and the anal edges was 4.7 ±1.3 cm, and the median diameter of the tumors was 0.9 ±1.2 cm. The major pathological types were neuroendocrine neoplasm G1 in 31 patients, and neuroendocrine neoplasm G2 in 7 patients. Tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stages I, II, III and IV tumors accounted for 76.3% (29/38), 5.3% (2/38), 7.9% (3/38) and 10.5% (4/38) of patients, respectively. The main treatment method was transanal extended excision or endoscopic resection. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of the whole group of patients were 100%, 83.7%, and 75.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Univariate analysis showed that age (p = 0.022), tumor diameter (p < 0.001), histological type (p < 0.001), and TNM stage (p < 0.001) were all prognostic factors.

Management of the hormonal syndrome of neuroendocrine tumors

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP/NET) are unusual and rare neoplasms that present many clinical challenges. They characteristically synthesize store and secrete a variety of peptides and neuroamines which can lead to the development of distinct clinical syndrome, however many are clinically silent until late presentation with mass effects. Management strategies include surgery cure and cytoreduction with the use of somatostatin analogues. Somatostatin have a broad range of biological actions that include inhibition of exocrine and endocrine secretions, gut motility, cell proliferation, cell survival and angiogenesis. Five somatostatin receptors (SSTR1-SSTR5) have been cloned and characterized. Somatostatin analogues include octreotide and lanreotide are effective medical tools in the treatment and present selectivity for SSTR2 and SSTR5. During treatment is seen disapperance of flushing, normalization of bowel movements and reduction of serotonin and 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5-HIAA) secretion. Telotristat represents a novel approach by specifically inhibiting serotonin synthesis and as such, is a promising potential new treatment for patients with carcinoid syndrome. To pancreatic functionig neuroendocrine tumors belongs insulinoma, gastrinoma, glucagonoma and VIP-oma. Medical management in patients with insulinoma include diazoxide which suppresses insulin release. Also mTOR inhibitors may inhibit insulin secretion. Treatment of gastrinoma include both proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine H2 - receptor antagonists. In patients with glucagonomas hyperglycaemia can be controlled using insulin and oral blood glucose lowering drugs. In malignant glucagonomas smatostatin analogues are effective in controlling necrolytic migratory erythemia. Severe cases of the VIP-oma syndrome require supplementation of fluid losses. Octreotide reduce tumoral VIP secretion and control secretory diarrhoea.

Prescription patterns of long-acting somatostatin analogues

Background:

Acromegaly and endocrine tumors are uncommon morbidities that are currently treated with different drugs.

Objective:

To determine the prescription patterns of somatostatin analogues in patients affiliated with the Health System of Colombia.

Methods:

Retrospective cohort study of patients of any age and sex treated with octreotide or lanreotide between January 2011 and August 2015. Socio-demographic, clinical (indications) and pharmacological (comedications) variables were considered. Multivariate analysis was performed with SPSS 23.0.

Results:

We identified 289 patients, with a mean age of 56.6 ± 14.0 years and female predominance (59.5%), who underwent treatment during the 56 months of monitoring. Octreotide was used in 56.1% of cases, followed by lanreotide (43.9%), both at approved doses. We found that 4.5% of subjects changed from one drug to another over the course of therapy, which was associated with being diabetic and receiving insulin (odds ratio: 4.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.23–14.84; p = 0.014). The most common indications were acromegaly (52.2% of cases) followed by neuroendocrine tumors (15.9%). The most common comorbidities were hypertension (39.4% of cases), depression (27.3%), dyslipidemia (23.3%), diabetes mellitus (23.5%) and hypothyroidism (23.5%). Being male (odds ratio: 0.57; 95% confidence interval: 0.35–0.94; p = 0.029) and belonging to the age group between 45 and 65 years (odds ratio: 0.44; 95% confidence interval: 0.21–0.90; p = 0.024) were significantly associated with a lower risk of receiving comedications.

Conclusion:

Somatostatin analogues are being used at recommended doses, especially in patients with acromegaly and neuroendocrine tumors. Variables associated with change in therapy were identified.

Management of controversial gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumour clinical situations with somatostatin analogues: results of a Delphi questionnaire panel from the NETPraxis program

BACKGROUND

There are clinical situations (CS) in which the use of somatostatin analogs (SSAs) in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) is controversial due to lack of evidence. A Delphi study was conducted to develop common treatment guidelines for these CS, based on clinical practice and expert opinion of Spanish oncologists.

METHODS

A scientific committee identified 5 CS with a common core (c-c) [non-functioning NET, not susceptible of surgery/locoregional therapy, Ki67 < 10 % (except for CS5: >10 %), ECOG ≤ 2], and controversy regarding use of SSAs, and prepared a Delphi questionnaire of 48 treatment statements. Statements were rated on a 1 (completely disagree) to 9 (completely agree) scale. Responses were grouped by tertiles: 1-3: Disagreement, 4-6: Neutral, 7-9: Agreement. Consensus was reached when the responses of ≥2/3 participants were located in the same tertile as the median value of all reported responses for that statement.

RESULTS

Sixty five (81.2 %) of 80 invited oncologists with experience in the management of NETs answered a first round of the questionnaire and 57 (87.7 %) of those 65 answered a second round (mean age 43.5 years; 53.8 % women; median time of experience 9 years). Consensus was obtained in 42 (36 agreement and 6 disagreement) of the 48 statements (87.5 %). Regarding CS1 (Enteropancreatic NET, c-c, non-progressive in the last 3-6 months), overall, SSA treatment is recommended (a wait and see approach is anecdotal and reserved for fragile patients or with low tumor load or ki-67 < 2 %); CS2 (Pancreatic NET, c-c), overall, SSA monotherapy is recommended, except when high tumor load or tumor progression exists, where combination therapy would be considered; CS3 [Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NET, c-c, in treatment with anti-proliferative dose of SSA and progressing], overall, SSA maintenance is recommended at the time of progression, with or without adding molecular targeted drugs; CS4 (GEP-NET, c-c, and negative octreoscan®), SSA in monotherapy is only considered in low-risk patients (low tumor load and Ki-67 < 5 %); CS5 [GEP-NET, c-c (ki67 > 10 %), and positive octreoscan®], monotherapy with SSA is mainly considered in patients with comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

Several recommendations regarding use of SSAs in controversial NET CS were reached in consensus and might be considered as treatment guideline.