1
|
Prabhakar P, Avudaiappan AP, Sandman M, Eldefrawy A, Caso J, Narayanan G, Manoharan M. Irreversible electroporation as a focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: A systematic review. Indian J Urol 2024; 40:6-16. [PMID: 38314081 PMCID: PMC10836445 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_370_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a new and promising focal therapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. In this systematic review, we summarize the literature on IRE for prostate cancer published over the last decade. Methods PubMed and EMBASE were searched with the end date of May 2023 to find relevant publications on prostate cancer ablation using IRE. Original studies with focal IRE as the primary curative treatment which reported on functional or oncological outcomes were included. The bibliography of relevant studies was also scanned to identify suitable articles. Results A total of 14 studies reporting on 899 patients treated with IRE for localized prostate cancer were included. Of all the studies reviewed, 77% reported on recurrence within the zone of ablation, and it ranged from 0% to 38.9% for in-field and 3.6% to 28% for out-of-field recurrence. Although, a standardised follow-up protocol was not followed, all the studies employed serial prostate-specific antigen monitoring, a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and a biopsy (6-12 months post-treatment). Across all the studies, 58% reported that the urinary continence returned to the pretreatment levels and 25% reported a minor decrease in the continence from the baseline at 12-months of follow-up. Erections sufficient for intercourse varied from 44% to 75% at the baseline to 55% to 100% at 12-months of follow-up across all the studies. Conclusion IRE, as a focal therapy, shows promising results with minimal complications and reasonably effective oncological control, but the data comparing it to the standard of care is still lacking. Future research should focus on randomized definitive comparisons between IRE, radical prostatectomy, and radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pushan Prabhakar
- Division of Urologic Oncologic Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | - Mayer Sandman
- Department of Urology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ahmed Eldefrawy
- Division of Urologic Oncologic Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Urology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jorge Caso
- Division of Urologic Oncologic Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Urology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Govindarajan Narayanan
- Division of Urologic Oncologic Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Murugesan Manoharan
- Division of Urologic Oncologic Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Urology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fujihara A, Ukimura O. Focal therapy of localized prostate cancer. Int J Urol 2022; 29:1254-1263. [PMID: 35996758 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
In the treatment of localized prostate cancer, controlling the cancer and maintaining quality of life are important. Focal therapy of localized prostate cancer aims to treat the lesion/part of the prostate that includes the index lesion, which determines the prognosis. We performed a non-systematic review of novel studies on focal therapy of localized prostate cancer as primary treatment published between 2016 and 2021. For mainly intermediate-risk patients, therapeutic technology, such as cryoablation, brachytherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, photodynamic therapy, microwave-coagulation, electroporation, and laser ablation, etc., were performed. These procedures are minimally invasive and safe, and provide good functional outcome: a 94-100% pad-free rate against urinary incontinence and 47-86% erectile function, which is sufficient for sexual intercourse. Accurate three-dimensional mapping of the targeted lesion could be an essential navigation technique for therapeutic success. Intermediate- to short-term oncological outcomes were good, resulting in downstaging of the patient's status to no clinically significant cancer; however, transition to conventional whole-gland treatment was necessary in about 10-30% of patients. It is important to select appropriate patients by both multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy, and to follow-up postoperatively with methods such as active surveillance. Clinically significant prostate-specific antigen reduction, image response using preoperative and postoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and histological analysis should be combined for follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsuko Fujihara
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Osamu Ukimura
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: The Impact on Sexual Function. URO 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/uro2040025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
Focal therapy (FT) has emerged as a potential treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa) with encouraging functional outcomes. According to the compelling evidence based on meta-analyses and recent trials, erectile function (EF) is mostly retained at 6 and 12 months after FT when compared to baseline. These findings are consistent across different energy sources reported to date. However, overall, quality of life, including impotence, was not the endpoint for most studies. Additionally, impotency has not been consistently reported in most of the recent literature. Furthermore, confounding factors such as baseline potency and usage of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5-I) were also frequently undisclosed. Long-term functional outcomes are awaited. To fully comprehend how FT affects EF, more extensive long-term randomized clinical trials using EF as a primary outcome are needed.
Collapse
|
4
|
Marra G, Shah TT, D’Agate D, Marquis A, Calleris G, Lunelli L, Filippini C, Oderda M, Gatti M, Valerio M, Sanchez-Salas R, Bossi A, Gomez-Rivas J, Conte F, Deandreis D, Cussenot O, Ricardi U, Gontero P. The SAFE Pilot Trial—SAlvage Focal Irreversible Electroporation—For Recurrent Localized Prostate Cancer: Rationale and Study Protocol. Front Surg 2022; 9:900528. [PMID: 35747441 PMCID: PMC9209638 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.900528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionCurrently, the majority of prostate cancer (PCa) recurrences after non-surgical first-line treatment are managed with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) is a curative alternative to ADT but yields significant morbidity. Preliminary evidence from focal salvage treatments shows similar oncological control but lower morbidity compared to sRP. Among available ablative focal energies, irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a treatment modality that proved promising, especially in treating apical lesions, where PCa most often recurs. Our aim is to test the safety of salvage IRE for recurrent PCa.MethodsWe performed a single-arm pilot feasibility study (IDEAL stage 2a): SAFE, SAlvage Focal irreversible Electroporation for recurrent localized PCa. Twenty patients with biopsy-proven PCa recurrence after primary non-surgical (radiation or ablation) treatment were included. All men will undergo mpMRI ± targeted biopsies, pre-operative PSMA-PET staging before inclusion and sIRE. Outcomes will be evaluated through internationally validated questionnaires and morbidity scales. All men will undergo a control biopsy at one year.ResultsPrimary objectives were the evaluation of the safety of sIRE (and patients’ quality of life) after treatment. Secondary objectives were the evaluation of functional outcomes, namely, continence and erectile function changes and evaluation of short-term oncological efficacy.ConclusionsSAFE is the second pilot study to evaluate sIRE and the first one performed according to the most recent diagnostic and staging imaging standards. sIRE may provide a curative option for recurrent PCa together with lower comorbidities compared to sRP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
- Department of Urology and Clinical Research Group on Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Sorbonne University Paris, Paris, France
- Correspondence: Giancarlo Marra
| | - Taimur T. Shah
- Department of Urology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniele D’Agate
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Marquis
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Department of Urology and Clinical Research Group on Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Sorbonne University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Claudia Filippini
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Oderda
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Gatti
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Radiology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier-Universitaire Vaudois, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Alberto Bossi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Juan Gomez-Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesca Conte
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Desiree Deandreis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology and Clinical Research Group on Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Sorbonne University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Division of Radiotherapy and Department of Oncology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Blazevski A, Gondoputro W, Scheltema MJ, Amin A, Geboers B, Barreto D, Haynes AM, Shnier R, Delprado W, Agrawal S, Thompson JE, Stricker PD. Salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy following focal ablation with irreversible electroporation: feasibility, oncological and functional outcomes. BMC Urol 2022; 22:28. [PMID: 35236338 PMCID: PMC8892750 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-00978-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To report the feasibility, oncological and functional outcomes of salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (sRARP) for recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after irreversible electroporation (IRE). Methods This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent sRARP by a single high-volume surgeon after IRE treatment in our institution. Surgical complications, oncological and functional outcomes were assessed. Results 15 patients with at least 12 months follow up were identified out of the 234 men who underwent primary IRE between 2013 and 2019. The median [IQR] age was 68 (62–70) years. The median [IQR] time from focal IRE to sRARP was 42 (21–57) months. There were no rectal, bladder or ureteric injuries. The T-stage was pT2 in 9 (60%) patients and pT3a in 6 (40%) patients. Only one (7%) patient had a positive surgical margin. At a median [IQR] follow up of 22 (16–32) months no patient had a biochemical recurrence (PSA > 0.2). All 15 patients were continent (pad-free) by 6 months and 9 (60%) patients had erections sufficient for intercourse with or without PDE5 inhibitors. No predisposing factors were identified for predicting erectile dysfunction after sRARP. Conclusions In patients with recurrent or residual significant PCa after focal IRE ablation it is feasible to obtain good functional and oncological outcomes with sRARP. Our results demonstrate that good outcomes can be achieved with sRARP, when respecting close monitoring post-IRE, good patient selection and surgical experience. The limitations of this study are that it is a small series, with short follow up and a lack of standardised quality of life instruments. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-022-00978-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandar Blazevski
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia. .,Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia. .,St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| | - William Gondoputro
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matthijs J Scheltema
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Amer Amin
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bart Geboers
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,Department of Interventional Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela Barreto
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Anne-Maree Haynes
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Warick Delprado
- Douglas Hanly Moir Pathology, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia
| | - Shikha Agrawal
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - James E Thompson
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Phillip D Stricker
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,Garvan Institute of Medical Research and Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yaxley WJ, Gianduzzo T, Kua B, Oxford R, Yaxley JW. Focal therapy for prostate cancer with irreversible electroporation: Oncological and functional results of a single institution study. Investig Clin Urol 2022; 63:285-293. [PMID: 35534217 PMCID: PMC9091832 DOI: 10.4111/icu.20210472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Materials and Methods Results Conclusions
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William John Yaxley
- Department of Urology, QEII Jubilee Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Troy Gianduzzo
- The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia
- Wesley Urology Clinic, Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Boon Kua
- Wesley Urology Clinic, Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rachel Oxford
- Wesley Urology Clinic, Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - John William Yaxley
- The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia
- Wesley Urology Clinic, Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hopstaken JS, Bomers JGR, Sedelaar MJP, Valerio M, Fütterer JJ, Rovers MM. An Updated Systematic Review on Focal Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: What Has Changed over the Past 5 Years? Eur Urol 2021; 81:5-33. [PMID: 34489140 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Focal therapy is a promising, minimally invasive strategy to selectively treat localized prostate cancer. A previous systematic review indicated that there is growing evidence for favorable functional outcomes, but that oncological effectiveness was yet to be defined. OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of focal therapy in patients with localized prostate cancer in terms of functional and oncological outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies between October 2015 and December 31, 2020. In addition, the research stages were acquired according to the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term study (IDEAL) recommendations. Ongoing studies were identified through clinical trial registries. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Seventy-two studies were identified exploring eight different sources of energy to deliver focal therapy in 5827 patients. Twenty-seven studies reported on high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), nine studies on irreversible electroporation, 11 on cryoablation, eight on focal laser ablation and focal brachytherapy, seven on photodynamic therapy (PDT), two on radiofrequency ablation, and one on prostatic artery embolization. The majority of studies were prospective development stage 2a studies (n = 35). PDT and HIFU, both in stage 3, showed promising results. Overall, HIFU studies reported a median of 95% pad-free patients and a median of 85% patients with no clinically significant cancer (CSC) in the treated area. For PDT, no changes in continence were reported and a median of 90% of patients were without CSC. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Over the past 5 yr, focal therapy has been studied for eight different energy sources, mostly in single-arm stage 2 studies. Although a first randomized controlled trial in focal therapy has been performed, more high-quality evaluations are needed, preferably via multicenter randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up and predefined assessment of oncological and functional outcomes and health-related quality-of-life measures. PATIENT SUMMARY Focal treatment (FT) of prostate cancer has potential, considering that it has less impact on continence and potency than radical treatment. Our systematic review indicates that despite the method being studied extensively over the past half decade, the majority of studies remain in an early research stage. The techniques high-intensity focused ultrasound and photodynamic therapy have shown most progression toward advanced research stages and show favorable results. However, more high-quality evidence is required before FT can become available as a standard treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana S Hopstaken
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Joyce G R Bomers
- Department of Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel J P Sedelaar
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jurgen J Fütterer
- Department of Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maroeska M Rovers
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Current evidence for focal therapy and partial gland ablation for organ-confined prostate cancer: systematic review of literature published in the last 2 years. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:49-57. [PMID: 33196540 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The shift in the diagnostic algorithm for prostate cancer to early imaging with mpMRI has resulted in many patients being diagnosed with small volume, apparently unilateral, clinically significant cancers. In these patients, a minimally invasive, nonmorbid intervention is appealing. The aim of this study was to review data reported within the last 2 years on focal therapy and partial gland ablation for organ-confined prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS High-intensity focal ultrasound, focal cryotherapy, photodynamic therapy, irreversible electroporation and focal laser ablation, have been used as treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer treatment. The reported oncologic outcomes vary widely and makes comparisons challenging. All the focal therapies report low rates of complications, and high rates of continence and erectile function preservation. The most common adverse events are hematuria, urinary retention and urinary tract infections. During this period, the initial results of several new technologies including MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation were published. SUMMARY Focal therapy and partial gland ablation for organ-confined prostate cancer is an option for patients with intermediate-risk disease because of its low complication profile and preservation of QOL. Trials comparing the outcome of different focal therapy technologies have not been carried out, and the existing evidence does not point to one approach being clearly superior to others. Long-term oncologic outcome is lacking. Despite this, for men with unilateral intermediate-risk prostate cancer whose disease is often relatively indolent, focal therapy is an appealing option.
Collapse
|
9
|
Fallara G, Capogrosso P, Maggio P, Taborelli A, Montorsi F, Dehò F, Salonia A. Erectile function after focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review. Int J Impot Res 2020; 33:418-427. [PMID: 32999435 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-00357-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Focal therapy modalities achieved interest in the management of prostate cancer (PCa) over the last a few years. This systematic review was aimed to investigate erectile function after focal therapy for localized PCa. Twenty-six out of 1287 reports were identified through a database systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science, supplemented with hand search, on June 1st, 2020, according to PRISMA guidelines. Focal therapy modalities investigated were cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), photodynamic therapy (TOOKAD), irreversible electroporation (IRE), and focal radiotherapy (RT) (i.e. brachytherapy or stereotactic RT). Overall, reported sexual function outcomes after these treatment modalities were generally good, with many studies reporting a complete recovery of EF at 1-year follow-up. However, the quality of current evidence is affected both by the lack of well-conducted comparative studies and by a significant heterogeneity in terms of study design, study population, erectile and sexual function assessment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Fallara
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.,University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Capogrosso
- Unit of Urology; ASST Sette Laghi-Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
| | - Paolo Maggio
- Unit of Urology; ASST Sette Laghi-Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Alessandro Taborelli
- Unit of Urology; ASST Sette Laghi-Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.,University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Dehò
- Unit of Urology; ASST Sette Laghi-Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.,University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
The effects of point-source electroporation on the blood-brain barrier and brain vasculature in rats: An MRI and histology study. Bioelectrochemistry 2020; 134:107521. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2020.107521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
11
|
Sharabi S, Guez D, Daniels D, Cooper I, Atrakchi D, Liraz-Zaltsman S, Last D, Mardor Y. The application of point source electroporation and chemotherapy for the treatment of glioma: a randomized controlled rat study. Sci Rep 2020; 10:2178. [PMID: 32034261 PMCID: PMC7005896 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59152-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The prognosis of Glioblastoma Multiforme patients is poor despite aggressive therapy. Reasons include poor chemotherapy penetration across the blood-brain barrier and tumor infiltration into surrounding tissues. Here we studied the effects of combined point-source electroporation (EP) and systemic chemotherapy in glioma-bearing rats. 128 rats were studied. Treatment groups were administered systemic Cisplatin/Methotrexate before EP (either 90 or 180 pulses). Control groups were treated by EP, chemotherapy, or no treatment. Tumor volumes were determined by MRI. Tumors growth rates of the EP + Methotrexate group (1.02 ± 0.77) were significantly lower (p < 0.01) than the control (5.2 ± 1.0) 1-week post treatment. No significant difference was found compared to Methotrexate (1.7 ± 0.5). Objective response rates (ORR) were 40% and 57% for the Methotrexate and EP + Methotrexate groups respectively. Tumor growth rates and ORR of the EP + Cisplatin groups (90 pulses 0.98 ± 0.2, 57%, 180 pulses 1.2 ± 0.1, 33%) were significantly smaller than the control (6.4 ± 1.0, p < 0.01, p < 0.02, 0%) and Cisplatin (3.9 ± 1.0, p < 0.04, p < 0.05, 13%) groups. No significant differences were found between the control groups. Increased survival was found in the EP + Cisplatin group, Χ2 = 7.54, p < 0.006 (Log Rank). Point-source EP with systemic chemotherapy is a rapid, minimal-invasive treatment that was found to induce significant antineoplastic effects in a rat glioma model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirley Sharabi
- The Advanced Technology Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, 52621, Israel.
| | - David Guez
- The Advanced Technology Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, 52621, Israel
| | - Dianne Daniels
- The Advanced Technology Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, 52621, Israel
| | - Itzik Cooper
- The Joseph Sagol Neuroscience Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.,Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Herzliya, Israel
| | - Dana Atrakchi
- The Joseph Sagol Neuroscience Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Sigal Liraz-Zaltsman
- The Joseph Sagol Neuroscience Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.,Gand Faculty of Health Profession, Ono Academic College, Kiryat Ono, Israel.,Department of Pharmacology, Institute for Drug Research, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - David Last
- The Advanced Technology Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, 52621, Israel
| | - Yael Mardor
- The Advanced Technology Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, 52621, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Milevoj N, Tozon N, Licen S, Lampreht Tratar U, Sersa G, Cemazar M. Health-related quality of life in dogs treated with electrochemotherapy and/or interleukin-12 gene electrotransfer. Vet Med Sci 2020; 6:290-298. [PMID: 31910331 PMCID: PMC7397887 DOI: 10.1002/vms3.232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the owners' perception of health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) of dogs after treatment with electrochemotherapy (ECT) alone or combined with interleukin‐12 gene electrotransfer (IL‐12 GET) and/or surgery. The owners of 44 dogs with histologically different tumours were offered the »Cancer Treatment Form« at least one month after treatment. The owners assessed their dogs’ quality of life (QoL) after treatment as good (mean 7.4) (from 1–very poor to 10–excellent) and the general health compared with the initial diagnosis of cancer as improving (mean 3.9) (from 1–worse to 5–better). The assessment of the current QoL was better within the group of dogs treated with non‐invasive treatment (ECT and/or IL‐12 GET only), compared with those that received invasive treatment, where, in addition to ECT and/or IL‐12 GET, surgery was performed (p < .05). The owners of dogs that achieved an objective response (OR) to the treatment assessed the QoL as significantly better compared with those whose dogs did not respond to the treatment (p < .05). The majority of the owners (86.4%) would opt for the therapy again, regardless of the financial costs. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that the majority of the owners of dogs assessed their dogs’ QoL as good and felt that it improved after the treatment, especially in dogs, treated with non‐invasive treatment and in those that responded to the treatment. This supports further use of ECT and IL‐12 GET as suitable methods for the treatment of selected tumours in veterinary medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Milevoj
- Veterinary Faculty, Small Animal Clinic, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Natasa Tozon
- Veterinary Faculty, Small Animal Clinic, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Sabina Licen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Isola, Slovenia
| | | | - Gregor Sersa
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Maja Cemazar
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Isola, Slovenia.,Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Aycock KN, Davalos RV. Irreversible Electroporation: Background, Theory, and Review of Recent Developments in Clinical Oncology. Bioelectricity 2019; 1:214-234. [PMID: 34471825 PMCID: PMC8370296 DOI: 10.1089/bioe.2019.0029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Irreversible electroporation (IRE) has established a clinical niche as an alternative to thermal ablation for the eradication of unresectable tumors, particularly those near critical vascular structures. IRE has been used in over 50 independent clinical trials and has shown clinical success when used as a standalone treatment and as a single component within combinatorial treatment paradigms. Recently, many studies evaluating IRE in larger patient cohorts and alongside other novel therapies have been reported. Here, we present the basic principles of reversible electroporation and IRE followed by a review of preclinical and clinical data with a focus on tumors in three organ systems in which IRE has shown great promise: the prostate, pancreas, and liver. Finally, we discuss alternative and future developments, which will likely further advance the use of IRE in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth N Aycock
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University, Blacksburg, Virginia
| | - Rafael V Davalos
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University, Blacksburg, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
|