Sonographically indeterminate scrotal masses: how MRI helps in characterization

Follow-up of non-palpable testicular incidentalomas under 1 cm: does growth rate differentiate malignant and non-malignant lesions?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether small, incidentally detected testicular lesions can be safely followed up, by assessing growth rate and volume threshold for benign vs. malignant lesions.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study includes a consecutive series of 130 testicular incidentalomas < 1 cm and with negative tumour markers identified from October 2001 to November 2022, which were initially followed up with ultrasound. A total of 39 cases proceeded to surgery during the study period, either due to lesion growth (n = 28) or patient preference/recommendation by the referring urologist (n = 11). For the lesions that were growing, specific growth rate (SGR) and doubling time (DT) were calculated assuming an exponential growth pattern. In addition, the velocity of increase of the average diameter (∆Dav) and of the maximum diameter (∆Dmax) were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 130 nodules that were initially followed up, six disappeared, eight were reduced in size, eighty-eight were stable, and twenty-eight increased in size. For operated nodules all 18 malignant tumours, 8/9 benign tumours, and 2/12 surgically proved non-neoplastic lesions were growing. The best cut-off values of the growth indicators to differentiate between malignant and non-malignant histology were 3.47 × 10-3%volume/day, ≤ 179 days, > 10 × 10-3 mm/day, and > 5 × 10-3 mm/day for SGR, DT, ∆Dmax, ∆Dav, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Malignant and non-malignant small incidentalomas can be effectively differentiated based on growing parameters, even though overlap exists. An increase of the maximum diameter of about 1 mm and 2 mm in three months and in six months, respectively, suggests malignancy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Growing parameters allow an educated assessment of benign and malignant small testicular incidentalomas. Non-aggressive management is justified and safe when follow-up includes self-examination and tumour marker assessment to reduce the risk of interval tumour growth.

KEY POINTS

Small, non-palpable and asymptomatic testicular nodules < 1 cm are unexpectedly discovered during scrotal ultrasound. Growth indicators estimate the potential malignancy, even though overlap with non-malignant lesions exists. Non-growing incidentalomas can be safely followed up.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Onset of Scrotal Pain-Without Trauma, Without Antecedent Mass: 2024 Update

Acute scrotum is a medical emergency that requires prompt accurate diagnosis to appropriately triage potentially surgical conditions. Numerous differential diagnoses with overlapping clinical presentations make this a diagnostic challenge. Ultrasound is the established first-line imaging modality for acute scrotal disease and can be used to diagnose most scrotal disorders promptly and with high accuracy. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy for non-invasive characterization of azoospermia: A prospective comparative single-center study

BACKGROUND

Azoospermia affects about 15% of childless males. The differential diagnosis between subtypes of azoospermia is the initial step in its management.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in distinguishing obstructive azoospermia from non-obstructive azoospermia and predicting sperm retrieval together with histological alterations in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective comparative study involved 60 men with obstructive azoospermia (group A) and 60 men with non-obstructive azoospermia (group B). Scrotal proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging were conducted for all participants to respectively evaluate testicular metabolites and normalized apparent diffusion coefficient 1 week before sperm retrieval.

RESULTS

Apparent diffusion coefficient was significantly higher in group B as compared to group A (0.47 ± 0.11 vs. 0.29 ± 0.05; and 0.46 ± 0.14 vs. 0.28 ± 0.02) for the right and left testis, respectively. Conversely, testicular choline and lipids were significantly higher in group A as compared to group B. Normalized apparent diffusion coefficient, choline, and lipids at cut-off levels of 0.353, 0.31, and 0.725 could differentiate between obstructive azoospermia and non-obstructive azoospermia (area under the curve = 0.963; confidence interval = 0.939-0.986, area under the curve = 0.985; confidence interval = 0.974-0.997, and area under the curve = 0.970; confidence interval = 0.940-0.999, respectively). Regarding the prediction of sperm retrieval in the non-obstructive azoospermia group, choline levels had the highest area under the curve (0.923), and its cut-off level was 0.195. The normalized apparent diffusion coefficient was significantly lower in men with positive sperm retrieval as compared to men with unsuccessful retrieval. Finally, it was revealed that all magnetic resonance imaging parameters except creatine could independently predict testicular histology in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. The highest prediction was 95% in normal spermatogenesis, and the least prediction was 40% in spermatid arrest. Regression analysis was used to detect final predictors and extrapolate an equation that could be used to predict testicular pathology CONCLUSIONS: Normalized apparent diffusion coefficient and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy are helpful in differentiating obstructive azoospermia from non-obstructive azoospermia and predicting sperm retrieval and related histological alterations in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.

Imaging Techniques to Differentiate Benign Testicular Masses from Germ Cell Tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss role of different diagnostic imaging modalities in differentiation of benign testicular masses from seminomatous germ cell tumors (SGCTs) and non-seminomatous GCTs (NSGCTs).

RECENT FINDINGS

New modalities of ultrasonography, including contrast enhancement and shear wave elastography, may help differentiate between benign and malignant intratesticular lesions. Ultrasonography remains the recommended imaging modality for initial evaluation of testicular masses. However, MRI can be used to better define equivocal testicular lesions on US.

Imaging of pediatric testicular tumors: A COG Diagnostic Imaging Committee/SPR Oncology Committee White Paper

Primary intratesticular tumors are uncommon in children, but incidence and risk of malignancy both sharply increase during adolescence. Ultrasound is the mainstay for imaging the primary lesion, and cross-sectional modalities are often required for evaluation of regional or distant disease. However, variations to this approach are dictated by additional clinical and imaging nuances. This paper offers consensus recommendations for imaging of pediatric patients with a known or suspected primary testicular malignancy at diagnosis and during follow-up.

A first look into radiomics application in testicular imaging: A systematic review

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the state of the art of radiomics in testicular imaging by assessing the quality of radiomic workflow using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). A systematic literature search was performed to find potentially relevant articles on the applications of radiomics in testicular imaging, and 6 final articles were extracted. The mean RQS was 11,33 ± 3,88 resulting in a percentage of 31,48% ± 10,78%. Regarding QUADAS-2 criteria, no relevant biases were found in the included papers in the patient selection, index test, reference standard criteria and flow-and-timing domain. In conclusion, despite the publication of promising studies, radiomic research on testicular imaging is in its very beginning and still hindered by methodological limitations, and the potential applications of radiomics for this field are still largely unexplored.

Gamut of Extratesticular Scrotal Masses: Anatomic Approach to Sonographic Differential Diagnosis

The commonly taught tenet that intratesticular lesions are always malignant and extratesticular scrotal lesions are always benign is a simplistic statement that erroneously minimizes the significance of extratesticular scrotal masses and their diagnosis. Yet, disease in the extratesticular space is commonly encountered by clinicians and radiologists and is often a source of uncertainty in diagnosis and management. Given the embryologically rooted complex anatomy of this region, a wide range of pathologic conditions is possible. Radiologists may not be familiar with some of these conditions; further, many of these lesions can have a specific sonographic appearance, allowing accurate diagnosis that can minimize surgical intervention. Lastly, malignancies can occur in the extratesticular space-although this is less common than in the testicles-and proper recognition of findings that warrant additional imaging or surgery is critical in optimizing outcomes. The authors present a compartmental anatomic framework for differential diagnosis of extratesticular scrotal masses and provide a comprehensive illustrative display of many of the pathologic conditions that can be encountered to familiarize radiologists with the sonographic appearances of these lesions. They also review management of these lesions and scenarios where US may not be definitive in diagnosis and selective use of scrotal MRI can be helpful. ^© RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

What Is the Malignant Potential of Small (<2 cm), Nonpalpable Testicular Incidentalomas in Adults? A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Unlike palpable lumps, a large number of nonpalpable testicular lesions found incidentally at ultrasound in asymptomatic postpuberal males are either benign tumours or non-neoplastic lesions. The prevalence of malignancy, however, is appraised based on small case series. Dedicated studies report a large number of patients, and systematic review articles are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review is aimed to assess, from the analysis of the pooled data of the available literature, the incidence of benign tumours, malignant tumours, and non-neoplastic lesions, and to identify predictive characteristics for malignancy.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) database, and the Cochrane Library was conducted on January 6, 2022, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Studies were retrieved reporting on adult asymptomatic men, with single, incidentally identified small testicular lesions, either fertile or infertile, with negative tumour markers and without specific risk factors for malignancy. Lesions ≤20 mm were considered small. Seventy-four studies were selected for inclusion in this analysis. Twenty-six additional publications have been retrieved by the bibliography quoted in the selected articles.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Pooled data of 1348 lesions in 1348 patients were collected. Of these lesions, 408 could be retrieved individually, 44.6% were benign, 27.2% were malignant, and 20.8% were non-neoplastic. Virtually all lesions <3 mm and 86.6% of lesions <5 mm were benign. Lesions >10 mm have a 38.14% probability of being benign. Hyperechoic lesions are likely benign. Fertility status does not affect the risk of malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Very small (<3 mm) and small (<5 mm) incidentally detected testicular lesions in asymptomatic postpuberal men with normal tumour markers could be frequently benign. More prospective studies are needed to better support this finding. Management strategies should be developed for these patients to reduce overtreatment.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Small testicular lesions are incidentally founded at ultrasound. It is not easy to distinguish a benign lesion from a malignant one. Results of this study are reporting a higher incidence of benign lesions with a diameter of <5 mm. More studies are needed to better understand the biology and the management strategy for small testicular lesions.

An Overview of the Role of Multiparametric MRI in the Investigation of Testicular Tumors

Simple Summary

Although conventional ultrasonography remains the primary imaging modality for the assessment of testicular tumors, multiparametric MRI of the scrotum, which combines morphologic and functional data, serves as a powerful adjunct. Based on the recommendations issued by the Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology, scrotal MRI is strongly recommended after equivocal US findings. In cases of testicular masses, the main clinical indications are as follows: lesion characterization when sonographic findings are non-diagnostic, discrimination between germ-cell and non-germ-cell testicular tumors, local staging of testicular tumors in patients who are candidates for testis-sparing surgery, and preoperative histological characterization of testicular germ-cell tumors in selected cases. This article aims to provide an overview of the role of multiparametric MRI in the investigation of testicular tumors.

Abstract

Conventional ultrasonography represents the mainstay of testis imaging. In cases in which ultrasonography is inconclusive, scrotal MRI using a multiparametric protocol may be used as a useful problem-solving tool. MRI of the scrotum is primarily recommended for differentiating between benign and malignant testicular masses when sonographic findings are ambiguous. This technique is also accurate in the preoperative local staging of testicular tumors and, therefore, is recommended in patients scheduled for testis-sparing surgery. In addition, MRI may provide valuable information regarding the histological characterization of testicular germ-cell tumors, in selected cases. Scrotal MRI may also help in the differentiation between testicular germ-cell neoplasms and non-germ-cell neoplasms. Axial T1-weighted imaging, axial and coronal T2-weighted imaging, axial diffusion-weighted imaging, and coronal subtracted dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging are the minimum requirements for scrotal MRI. A variety of MRI techniques—including diffusion tensor imaging, magnetization transfer imaging, proton MR spectroscopy, volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis, and MRI-based radiomics—are being investigated for testicular mass characterization, providing valuable supplementary diagnostic information. In the present review, we aim to discuss clinical indications for scrotal MRI in cases of testicular tumors, along with MRI findings of common testicular malignancies.

A 40‐year‐old man with a rapidly growing intrascrotal tumor in the fibroma–thecoma group

Introduction

Tumors in the fibroma–thecoma group are benign tumors, typically found in the ovaries of postmenopausal women and occasionally develop in the testes. These tumors are mostly treated with radical orchiectomy because preoperative diagnosis confirming the benign nature is difficult.

Case presentation

A 40‐year‐old man was incidentally pointed out to have a right intrascrotal mass, measuring approximately 10 cm on computed tomography. Malignant testicular tumor was suspected based on the location and size of the tumor. The patient underwent right radical orchiectomy. Histologically, the tumor had no evidence of malignancy, and the diagnosis of tumors in the fibroma–thecoma group was made. The patient had no recurrence 8 months after surgery.

Conclusion

Intrascrotal tumors in the fibroma–thecoma group are rare benign tumors and mostly treated with radical orchiectomy due to concerns about malignancies. Further investigation is needed for accurate preoperative diagnosis, and we should be aware of these rare tumors.

[Magnetic resonance imaging accuracy and utility for testicular cancer diagnosis]

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study is to analyze the imaging findings described in MRI and the histopathologic type of testicular lesions to determine which findings are the best predictors of malignancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty six (46) patients with testicular lesions were initially studied with ultrasound (US) and with testicular MRI (tMRI) on a 1.5-T magnet. MRIs were reviewed by a radiologist with 8 years of experience and imaging findings such as the size of the lesion, the signal intensity in T1, T2 weighted sequences, and the enhancement after endovenous contrast administration, were correlated with the histopathologic diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The enhancement after administration of contrast was the finding of better performance with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 90 (71-97), 47 (24-71), 74 (56-87) and 73 (40-92), respectively. Meanwhile, the results for hypointense/heterogeneous lesions in T2 weighted sequences and with enhancement with intravenous contrast were 87 (49-84), 47 (44-89), 74 (55-86) y 67 (35-89), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The finding of a testicular lesion of low signal intensity and heterogeneous in T2 weighted sequences, with IV contrast enhancement represents a valuable predictor of malignancy. The latter being the most sensitive as a predictor of malignancy.

Ultrasonography of the scrotum: Revisiting a classic technique

Conventional US is the primary imaging modality for the evaluation of the scrotum, due to its high resolution, availability, cost-effectiveness and absence of ionizing radiation. Grayscale and color Doppler US provide a comprehensive assessment of scrotal diseases. The technique represents the mainstay for imaging of acute scrotum. US is highly accurate in the detection, localization and characterization of scrotal masses. Multiparametric US, including conventional US, contrast-enhanced US and tissue elastography has improved the diagnostic performance of the technique in the assessment of testicular diseases. MRI represents a valuable supplemental imaging tool for the investigation of scrotal pathology, mainly recommended in cases of indeterminate US findings. Recommendations recently issued by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group (ESUR-SPIWG) refer to the use of scrotal sonography for the evaluation of pathologic entities, including testicular microlithiasis, small, non-palpable incidentally detected testicular masses, varicocele and scrotal trauma. In this review, the technical specifications for scrotal US and the normal sonographic findings are presented. Grayscale and color Doppler US findings of common acute scrotal diseases and scrotal masses are discussed. The complimentary role of multiparametric US and scrotal MRI is addressed. ESUR-SPIWG's guidelines are also reviewed.

Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: Classification, Pathologic Features, Imaging Findings, and Management

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) demonstrate a wide variety of histopathologic, genetic, pathogenetic, and immunocytochemical characteristics and various clinical-biologic profiles and prognoses. Most TGCTs arise from an intratubular precursor cell referred to as germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS), which is an embryonic germ cell with the potential to differentiate into a plethora of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. Advances in pathologic examination and genetics paved the way for the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system, which recognizes two pathogenetically distinct groups of TGCTs. Although postpubertal tumors originate from GCNIS, almost all prepubertal tumors belong to the non-GCNIS category. Molecular testing for chromosome 12p amplification helps to distinguish the two tumor categories. Imaging techniques such as US, CT, MRI, and fluorine 18 (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT are pivotal to the diagnosis and staging, evaluation of complications and treatment response, and long-term surveillance of TGCTs. In addition, select MRI findings may help to differentiate a seminoma from a nonseminomatous mixed TGCT. Accurate diagnosis of TGCTs has therapeutic and prognostic implications. Although seminomas show exquisite response to chemotherapy and radiation therapy, postpubertal teratomas are highly resistant to both. The 2016 WHO classification system introduced changes in the diagnosis and management of TGCTs, including the development of new treatment and follow-up guidelines. Radiologists play an essential role in the optimal treatment of patients with TGCTs. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.

An annotated T2-weighted magnetic resonance image collection of testicular germ and non-germ cell tumors

Testicular cancer is a rare tumor with a worldwide incidence that has increased over the last few decades. The majority of these tumors are testicular non-germ (TNGCTs) and germ cell tumors (TGCTs); the latter divided into two broad classes - seminomatous (SGCTs) and non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs). Although ultrasonography (US) maintains a primary role in the diagnostic workup of scrotal pathology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as the imaging modality recommended for challenging cases, providing additional information to clarify inconclusive/equivocal US. In this work we describe and publicly share a collection of 44 images of annotated T2-weighted MRI lesions from 42 patients. Given that testicular cancer is a rare tumor, we are confident that this collection can be used to validate statistical models and to further investigate TNGCT and TGCT peculiarities using medical imaging features.

Measurement(s)	sex cord-gonadal stromal tumor
Technology Type(s)	magnetic resonance imaging
Sample Characteristic - Organism	Homo sapiens

Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14511624

Identifying the deceiver: the non-neoplastic mimickers of genital system neoplasms

Tumors of the genital system are common and imaging is of crucial importance for their detection and diagnosis. Several non-neoplastic diseases may mimic these tumors and differential diagnosis may be difficult in certain cases. Misdiagnosing non-neoplastic diseases as tumor may prompt unnecessary medical treatment or surgical interventions. In this article, we aimed to present the imaging characteristics of non-neoplastic diseases of the male and female genital systems that may mimic neoplastic processes. Increasing awareness of the imaging specialists to these entities may have a severe positive impact on the management of these patients.

When to ask for an MRI of the scrotum

Background

Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the scrotum has been established as a useful second‐line diagnostic tool for the investigation of scrotal diseases. Recently, recommendations on clinical indications for scrotal MRI were issued by the Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

Objective

To update current research on when to ask for an MRI of the scrotum.

Methods

PubMed database was searched for original articles and reviews published during 2010–2021.

Results

Eighty‐three articles fulfilled the search criteria. Scrotal MRI is mainly recommended after inconclusive US findings or inconsistent with the clinical examination and should be asked in the following cases: differentiation between intratesticular and paratesticular lesions (in rare cases of uncertain US findings), characterization of paratesticular and intratesticular lesions (when US findings are indeterminate), discrimination between germ cell and sex cord‐stromal testicular tumors, local staging of testicular malignancies (in patients planned for testis‐sparing surgery), differentiation between seminomas and non‐seminomatous tumors (when immediate chemotherapy is planned and orchiectomy is delayed), assessment of acute scrotum and scrotal trauma (rarely needed, in cases of non‐diagnostic US findings) and detection and localization of undescended testes (in cases of inconlusive US findings). Although preliminary data show promising results in the evaluation of male infertility, no established role for mpMRI still exists.

Conclusion

Multiparametric MRI of the scrotum, by assessing morphologic and functional data represents a valuable problem‐solving tool, helping to improve our understanding on the nature of scrotal pathology and the process of spermatogenesis. The technique may improve patient care and reduce the number of unnecessary surgical procedures.

MRI in the evaluation of the azoospermic male

PURPOSE We aimed to show the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of infertile men and its ability to distinguish obstructive from nonobstructive azoospermia. METHODS Between April 2015 and February 2018, 45 azoospermic men underwent scrotal MRI. We evaluated the images with an emphasis on signal characteristics of the testis and morphologic changes typical for obstruction. Testicular volume (TV), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, T1 and T2 signal ratios (testis/muscle) were measured for every testis. On the basis of histologic results, patients were divided into two groups: obstructive azoospermia (OA) and nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). RESULTS Testes of patients in the OA group had significantly lower ADC values (mean 0.876±101 ×10-3 mm2/s) than in the NOA group (mean, 1.114±147 ×10-3 mm2/s). TV was significantly higher in patients with OA (median, 17.61 mL; range, 11.1-38.4 mL) than in those with NOA (median, 10.5 mL; range, 5.2-22.2 mL). ROC analysis showed that both TV and ADC values were highly predictive for distinguishing between OA and NOA patients, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.82 and 0.92 respectively. A cutoff value of ≥12.4 mL could distinguish obstructive from nonobstructive azoospermia with a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 63%, whereas for ADC measurements a cutoff value of ≥0.952 ×10-3 mm2/s exhibited a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 90% There was no statistically significant difference in T1 and T2 signal ratios between both groups. Abnormalities typical for obstruction of the male reproductive tract (e.g., dilatation of ejaculatory ducts, prostatic or seminal vesicle cysts) were found in 78% of patients (14/18) in the obstructive group. CONCLUSION Scrotal MRI is a very effective tool for the evaluation of azoospermic men and may provide important information facilitating interventional treatment of infertility.

The potential role of MR based radiomic biomarkers in the characterization of focal testicular lesions

How to differentiate with MRI-based techniques testicular germ (TGCTs) and testicular non-germ cell tumors (TNGCTs) is still under debate and Radiomics may be the turning key. Our purpose is to investigate the performance of MRI-based Radiomics signatures for the preoperative prediction of testicular neoplasm histology. The aim is twofold: (i), differentiating TGCTs and TNGCTs status and (ii) differentiating seminomas (SGCTs) from non-seminomatous (NSGCTs). Forty-two patients with pathology-proven testicular neoplasms and referred for pre-treatment MRI, were retrospectively enrolled. Thirty-two out of 44 lesions were TGCTs. Twelve out of 44 were TNGCTs or other histologies. Two radiologists segmented the volume of interest on T2-weighted images. Approximately 500 imaging features were extracted. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) was applied as method for variable selection. A linear model and a linear support vector machine (SVM) were trained with selected features to assess discrimination scores for the two endpoints. LASSO identified 3 features that were employed to build fivefold validated linear discriminant and linear SVM classifiers for the TGCT-TNGCT endpoint giving an overall accuracy of 89%. Four features were employed to build another SVM for the SGCT-SNGCT endpoint with an overall accuracy of 86%. The data obtained proved that T2-weighted-based Radiomics is a promising tool in the diagnostic workup of testicular neoplasms by discriminating germ cell from non-gem cell tumors, and seminomas from non-seminomas.

Infantile synchronous primary bilateral testicular germ cell tumor: a case report and review of the literature

Testicular tumors are uncommon in adults, accounting for <1% of all cancers, with testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) representing the majority (>95%) of reported cases. Adult and prepubertal TGCTs are fundamentally distinct and the latter is extremely rare, representing 1% of all pediatric solid tumors and having an annual incidence rate of 0.5-2/100,000 boys. Bilateral TGCTs (BTGCTs) account for 0.5-5% of all testicular tumors; the majority are metachronous, while the synchronous account for approximately 0.5-1%. A 16-month-old boy was admitted to our Urology Department with a 2-week history of a painless scrotal mass. Ultrasonography revealed a homogeneous hyperechoic solid mass with rich blood supply in the right testis, and no discernable testicular tissue. A well-delineated heterogeneous echo mass was found within the left testis. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan showed a significantly enhanced mass in the right testis and a mildly enhanced mass in the left testis. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was 12,567 ng/mL, while β-human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and total testosterone levels were normal. Accordingly, bilateral testicular tumors were the primary consideration. The patient underwent right radical inguinal orchiectomy with high ligation of the spermatic cord and left testicle-sparing surgery. Final pathology confirmed a pure yolk sac tumor (YST) from the right testis and a cystic mature teratoma from the left. The follow-up ultrasonography showed no recurrence, with serum AFP returned to normal by postoperative day 44. Synchronous primary BTGCT with teratoma and YST respectively can occur coincidently and successfully treated by testicle-sparing surgery.

MRI of testicular malignancies

Although testicular carcinoma represents approximately only 1% of solid neoplasms in men, it is the most common malignancy between young men. The two main histologic categories are testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs), including seminomas and nonseminomas, accounting for 90-95% of testicular neoplasms and sex cord-stromal tumors. Scrotal MRI, including a multiparametric protocol, has been proposed as a valuable supplemental imaging technique in the investigation of testicular pathology. Recently, the Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group appointed by the board of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology has produced recommendations on when to perform scrotal MRI. Regarding intratesticular masses, MRI of the scrotum may be used for their characterization, when US findings are indeterminate and for local staging of TGCTs, when organ-sparing surgery is planned. Differentiation between seminomas and nonseminomas is possible based on MRI features, when clinically needed. Scrotal MRI may also help in differentiating between TGCTs and nongerm cell tumors. Functional information based on diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data improve testicular mass lesion characterization. Preliminary observations on diffusion tensor imaging, magnetization transfer imaging, and proton MR spectroscopy bring about new data in the understanding of testicular microstructure and pathophysiology.