Comparison of Cisplatin with Lipoplatin in Terms of Ototoxicity

The Impact of Oleuropein on Cisplatin-Induced Toxicity in Cochlear Cells in Relation to the Expression of Deoxyribonucleic Acid Damage-Associated Genes

Different organs respond differently to cisplatin (CDDP)-induced toxicity. Oleuropein (OLE) is a natural phenolic antioxidant. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential protective effect of OLE against CDDP-induced ototoxicity by evaluating expression of genes associated with deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage and repair in cochlear cells. House Ear Institute-Organ of Corti 1 (HEI-OC1) cells were treated using CDDP, OLE, and OLE-CDDP. The water-soluble tetrazolium salt assay was used for monitoring cell viability. Deoxyribonucleic acid damage in cells due to the CDDP, OLE, and combination treatments was determined using a flow-cytometric kit. The change in the expression of 84 genes associated with CCDP, OLE, and OLE-CDDP treatments that induced DNA damage was tested using the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction array. Changes ≥3-fold were considered significant. House Ear Institute-Organ of Corti 1 cell viability was significantly reduced by CDDP. The OLE-CDDP combination restored the cell viability. Cisplatin increased the H2AX ratio, while OLE-CDDP combination decreased it. Some of the DNA damage-associated genes whose expression was upregulated with CDDP were downregulated with OLE-CDDP, while the expression of genes such as Gadd45g and Rev1 was further downregulated. The expression of DNA repair-related Abl1, Dbd2, Rad52, and Trp53 genes was downregulated with CDDP, whereas their expression was upregulated with OLE-CDDP treatment. In cochlear cells, the OLE-CDDP combination downregulated DNA damage-associated gene expression relative to that upregulated mainly by CDDP. The results revealed that OLE has a potential protective effect on CDDP-induced ototoxicity in cochlear cells by altering the expression of DNA damage-related genes.

Comparison of Cytotoxic and Ototoxic Effects of Lipoplatin and Cisplatin in Neuroblastoma In Vivo Tumor Model

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the cytotoxic, cytostatic, and ototoxic effects of lipoplatin compared to cisplatin application in the subcutaneous xenograft nude mouse neuroblastoma tumor model.

METHODS

In this study, C1300 neuroblastoma cells were administered subcutaneously to 21 male nude mice. When the tumor reached 150 mm3 diameter, mice were randomized into 3 groups. Saline, cisplatin, and lipoplatin were given intraperitoneally. The auditory function tests were performed before administration and 72 hours after administration. Mice were sacrificed and the tumor and cochlea were removed after 72 hours. Histopathologic evaluation of necrosis and apoptosis was determined by the TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) method. Cyclooxygenase 2, superoxide dismutase 2, and inducible nitric oxide synthase levels were determined by immunohistochemistry in tissue samples.

RESULTS

Apoptosis and necrosis rates were higher in lipoplatin group than in cisplatin group (P=.035 and P=.010, respectively) in tumor tissue. In the spiral ganglion, apoptosis and necrosis were lower in the lipoplatin group than in cisplatin group (P=.002 and P=.002, respectively). Cyclooxygenase 2 pattern in the cochlea was positive in both control and lipoplatin group and negative in cisplatin group (P=.001). Superoxide dismutase 2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase 2 protein expressions showed no difference between groups. The auditory functions were similar to baseline values and had a better threshold value in lipoplatin group than cisplatin group.

CONCLUSION

For the treatment of neuroblastoma, the use of lipoplatin seems to be beneficial in reducing side effects of cisplatin. We recommend that the mechanism of these properties of lipoplatin should be evaluated in further studies.

Advances in Delivery of Chemotherapeutic Agents for Cancer Treatment

Presently, most of the treatment strategies for cancer are focused on the surgical removal of cancerous tumors, along with physical and chemical treatment such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy, respectively. The primary issue associated with these methods is the inhibition of normal cell growth and serious side effects associated with systemic toxicity. The traditional chemotherapeutics which were delivered systemically were inadequate and had serious dose limiting side effects. Recent advances in the development of chemotherapeutics have simultaneously paved the way for efficient targeted drug delivery. Despite the advances in the field of oncogenic drugs, several limitations remain, such as early blood clearance, acquired resistance against cytotoxic agents, toxicity associated with chemotherapeutics, and site-specific drug delivery. Hence, this review article focuses on the recent scientific advancements made in different types of drug delivery systems, including, organic nanocarriers (polymers, albumins, liposomes, and micelles), inorganic nanocarriers (mesoporous silica nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles, platinum nanoparticles, and carbon nanotubes), aptamers, antibody-drug conjugates, and peptides. These targeted drug delivery approaches offer numerous advantages such as site-specific drug delivery, minimal toxicity, better bioavailability, and an increased overall efficacy of the chemotherapeutics. Graphical abstract.

Lipid, polymeric, inorganic-based drug delivery applications for platinum-based anticancer drugs

The three main FDA-approved platinum drugs in chemotherapy such as carboplatin, cisplatin, and oxaliplatin are extensively applied in cancer treatments. Although the clinical applications of platinum-based drugs are extremely effective, their toxicity profile restricts their extensive application. Therefore, recent studies focus on developing new platinum drug formulations, expanding the therapeutic aspect. In this sense, recent advances in the development of novel drug delivery carriers will help with the increase of drug stability and biodisponibility, concomitantly with the reduction of drug efflux and undesirable secondary toxic effects of platinum compounds. The present review describes the state of the art of platinum drugs with their biological effects, pre- and clinical studies, and novel drug delivery nanodevices based on lipids, polymers, and inorganic.

Long Noncoding RNA PRNCR1 Reduces Renal Epithelial Cell Apoptosis in Cisplatin-Induced AKI by Regulating miR-182-5p/EZH1

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This study was designed to examine the role of long noncoding RNA PRNCR1 in cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

The expression levels of PRNCR1 and miR-182-5p in cisplatin-induced AKI mice were examined. HK-2 cells were treated with cisplatin to induce cell damage. Then, the effects of PRNCR1 and miR-182-5p on cisplatin-stimulated HK-2 cell viability and apoptosis were detected by the CCK-8 and annexin V-FITC/PI method. Target genes of PRNCR1 and miR-182-5p were analyzed by bioinformatics analysis and luciferase.

RESULTS

The expression level of PRNCR1 was significantly reduced in cisplatin-induced AKI mice. In addition, overexpression of PRNCR1 attenuated the damage of cisplatin to HK-2. The expression level of miR-182-5p was significantly raised in cisplatin-induced AKI mice. MiR-182-5p was negatively regulated by PRNCR1 and leaded to an upregulation of EZH1 expression. Overexpression of PRNCR1 attenuated cisplatin-induced apoptosis by downregulating the miR-182-5p/EZH1 axis.

CONCLUSION

LncPRNCR1 reduced the apoptosis of renal epithelial cells induced by cisplatin by modulating miR-182-5p/EZH1.

Nano liposomal and cubosomal formulations with platinum-based anticancer agents: therapeutic advances and challenges

Nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity and multidrug resistance in tumor cells can result from platinum-based anticancer (PBA) agents which can be reduced by nano formulations. Recently, novel formulations based on liposomes and cubosomes have been described as efficient strategies to overcome nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, neurotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, hematological toxicities, hepatotoxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity as well as multidrug resistance. The co-delivery of anticancer agents concomitant with PBAs via biocompatible and biodegradable smart liposomes and cubosomes can augment therapeutic results of chemotherapy as well as radiotherapy owing to their high accessibility of surface and internal modification. For this purpose, surface, bilayer or core sections of these formulations can be functionalized by pure PBAs or modified PBAs. In this review, recent significant advances and challenges related to various liposomal and cubosomal formulations of PBA are presented in order to emphasize suitable formulations for anticancer applications with critical thoughts provided on how the field can progress.

The monofunctional platinum(II) compounds, phenanthriplatin and pyriplatin, modulate apoptosis signaling pathways in HEI-OC1 auditory hybridoma cells

Cisplatin is a platinum(II) chemotherapy drug that can cause the side-effect of ototoxicity and hearing loss. The monofunctional platinum(II) complexes, phenanthriplatin and pyriplatin, have recently been investigated as anti-cancer agents but their side-effects are largely unknown. Here, we used the auditory hybridoma cell line, HEI-OC1, to investigate the ototoxicity of cisplatin, phenanthriplatin and pyriplatin. The effect of these compounds against cellular viability, on reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, mitochondrial membrane polarization, caspase-3/7 activity, DNA integrity and caspase-12 expression were measured using spectrophotometric, flow cytometric and blot analyses. We found that the monofunctional complexes and cisplatin decreased cellular viability. All three compounds increased ROS yield at 24 h, but at 48 h, ROS levels returned to normal. Also, the compounds did not depolarize the mitochondrial membrane. All three compounds reduced caspase-3/7 activity at 24 h; cisplatin increased caspase-3/7 activity and caused apoptosis at 48 h. Caspase-12 expression was associated with all three compounds. In summary, the monofunctional complexes may cause ototoxicity like cisplatin. Phenanthriplatin and pyriplatin may cause ototoxicity initially by inducing ROS production, but they may also signal through distinct apoptotic pathways that do not integrate caspases-3/7, or may act at different time-points in the same pathways.

Comparison of Cisplatin with Lipoplatin in Terms of Ototoxicity

OBJECTIVE

Cisplatin (CDDP) is an anti-neoplastic agent that has been used in treatments of both pediatric and adult cancers. It has many side effects, such as ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and neurotoxicity. Lipoplatin (LIPO) is a nanomolecule with 110 nm diameter and composed of lipids and CDDP. In this study, we aimed to compare the toxic effects of LIPO with CDDP in the cochlear cells with anti-tumoral doses determined in neuroblastoma cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

House Ear Institute Organ Corti 1 (HEI-OC1), MYC-N amplified KELLY, and MYC-N non-amplified SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells were used in this study. Firstly, anti-tumoral lethal dose 50 (LD50) of LIPO and CDDP were determined using the WST-1 assay in both neuroblastoma cells. Then anti-tumoral doses of CDDP and LIPO were applied on HEI-OC1 cells for evaluating the toxic effects. The apoptotic cell death was measured using flow cytometric analysis of annexin-V/7-amino-actinomycin (7-AAD) and cell cycle tests.

RESULTS

LIPO or CDDP inhibited cell viability in a dose- and time-dependent manner in both neuroblastoma and HEI-OC1 cells. LD50 values were selected as 20 mM for CDDP and 750 mM for LIPO in neuroblastoma cells. After the 48-hour incubation, KELLY cells treated with 20 mM CDDP and 750 mM LIPO had a 53% viability; SH-SY5Y cells treated 20 mM CDDP and 750 mM LIPO had a 45% and 58% viability, respectively; and HEI-OC1 cells treated with 20 mM CDDP and 750 mM LIPO had a 65% and 82% viability, respectively.

CONCLUSION

LIPO showed less toxic effects in the HEI-OC1 cells compared to CDDP at anti-tumoral doses.

Cisplatin and beyond: molecular mechanisms of action and drug resistance development in cancer chemotherapy

Background

Platinum-based anticancer drugs are widely used in the chemotherapy of human neoplasms. The major obstacle for the clinical use of this class of drugs is the development of resistance and toxicity. It is therefore very important to understand the chemical properties, transport and metabolic pathways and mechanism of actions of these compounds. There is a large body of evidence that therapeutic and toxic effects of platinum drugs on cells are not only a consequence of covalent adducts formation between platinum complexes and DNA but also with RNA and many proteins. These processes determine molecular mechanisms that underlie resistance to platinum drugs as well as their toxicity. Increased expression levels of various transporters and increased repair of platinum-DNA adducts are both considered as the most significant processes in the development of drug resistance. Functional genomics has an increasing role in predicting patients’ responses to platinum drugs. Genetic polymorphisms affecting these processes may play an important role and constitute the basis for individualized approach to cancer therapy. Similar processes may also influence therapeutic potential of nonplatinum metal compounds with anticancer activity.

Conclusions

Cisplatin is the most frequently used platinum based chemotherapeutic agent that is clinically proven to combat different types of cancers and sarcomas.