1
|
Lassaletta L, Acle Cervera L, Altuna X, Amilibia Cabeza E, Arístegui Ruiz M, Batuecas Caletrio Á, Benítez Del Rosario J, Cabanillas Farpón R, Costales Marcos M, Escada P, Espinosa-Sánchez JM, García Leal R, Gavilán J, Gómez Martínez J, González-Aguado R, Martinez-Glez V, Guerra Jiménez G, Harguindey Antolí-Candela A, Hernández García BJ, Orús Dotú C, Polo López R, Manrique M, Martín Sanz E, Martínez Álvarez R, Martínez H, Martínez-Martínez M, Rey-Martinez J, Ropero Romero F, Santa Cruz Ruiz S, Vallejo LÁ, Soto Varela A, Varela-Nieto I, Morales Puebla JM. Clinical practice guideline on the management of vestibular schwannoma. ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA 2024; 75:108-128. [PMID: 38346489 DOI: 10.1016/j.otoeng.2023.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common tumour of the cerebellopontine angle. The greater accessibility to radiological tests has increased its diagnosis. Taking into account the characteristics of the tumour, the symptoms and the age of the patient, three therapeutic strategies have been proposed: observation, surgery or radiotherapy. Choosing the most appropriate for each patient is a frequent source of controversy. MATERIAL AND METHODS This paper includes an exhaustive literature review of issues related to VS that can serve as a clinical guide in the management of patients with these lesions. The presentation has been oriented in the form of questions that the clinician usually asks himself and the answers have been written and/or reviewed by a panel of national and international experts consulted by the Otology Commission of the SEORL-CCC. RESULTS A list has been compiled containing the 13 most controversial thematic blocks on the management of VS in the form of 50 questions, and answers to all of them have been sought through a systematic literature review (articles published on PubMed and Cochrane Library between 1992 and 2023 related to each thematic area). Thirty-three experts, led by the Otology Committee of SEORL-CCC, have analyzed and discussed all the answers. In Annex 1, 14 additional questions divided into 4 thematic areas can be found. CONCLUSIONS This clinical practice guideline on the management of VS offers agreed answers to the most common questions that are asked about this tumour. The absence of sufficient prospective studies means that the levels of evidence on the subject are generally medium or low. This fact increases the interest of this type of clinical practice guidelines prepared by experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Lassaletta
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | - Xabier Altuna
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain
| | - Emilio Amilibia Cabeza
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Arístegui Ruiz
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ángel Batuecas Caletrio
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jesús Benítez Del Rosario
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | | | - María Costales Marcos
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | - Pedro Escada
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Juan Manuel Espinosa-Sánchez
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (ibs.GRANADA), Granada, Spain
| | - Roberto García Leal
- Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Gavilán
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Justo Gómez Martínez
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | - Rocío González-Aguado
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Victor Martinez-Glez
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT-CERCA), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gloria Guerra Jiménez
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil de las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | | | | | - Cesar Orús Dotú
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rubén Polo López
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel Manrique
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Eduardo Martín Sanz
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Henry Martínez
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Clínica San Rafael, Sur Bogotá D. C., Colombia; Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital San José, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Jorge Rey-Martinez
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain
| | | | - Santiago Santa Cruz Ruiz
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Luis Ángel Vallejo
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Andrés Soto Varela
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Departamento de Cirugía y Especialidades Médico-Quirúrgicas, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Isabel Varela-Nieto
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Grupo de Audición y Mielinopatías, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Alberto Sols, CSIC-UAM, CIBERER-ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Manuel Morales Puebla
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
El Sayed Ahmad Y, Gallois Y, Sol JC, Boetto S, Attal J, Sabatier J, Debs R, Deguine O, Marx M. Evolution in the management of vestibular schwannoma: a single-center 15-year experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280:4885-4894. [PMID: 37195345 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08009-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To highlight the changes in the management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) since 2004 with a focus on small- to middle-size VS. METHODS Retrospective analysis of the decisions made in skull base tumor board between 2004 and 2021. RESULTS 1819 decisions were analyzed (average age 59.25, 54% females). Overall, 850 (47%) cases were allocated to a Wait and Scan (WS) approach, 416 (23%) received radiotherapy and 553 (30%) were treated surgically (MS). All stages considered WS increased from 39% before 2010 to 50% after 2010. Similarly, Stereotactic Radio Therapy (SRT) increased from 5 to 18%. MS decreased from 46 to 25%. It was more commonly proposed to younger patients and larger tumors, p < 0.001. For Koos stages 1, 2, and 3 there was a statistically significant increase in SRT, and a decrease in MS, p < 0.001. WS also increased for stages 1 and 2. However, such a trend was not observed for stage 3. MS remained the primary treatment modality for stage 4 tumors throughout the study period, p = 0.057. The significance of advanced age as a factor favoring SRT decreased over time. The opposite is true for serviceable hearing. There was also a decrease in the percentage of the justification "young age" in the MS category. CONCLUSION The is a continuing trend towards non-surgical treatment. Small- to medium-sized VS witnessed an increase in both WS and SRT. There is only an increase in SRT for moderately large VS. Physicians are less and less considering young age as a factor favoring MS over SRT. There is a tendency towards favoring SRT when hearing is serviceable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youssef El Sayed Ahmad
- Department of Otology, Otoneurology and Pediatric Otolaryngology, Pierre-Paul Riquet Hospital, Toulouse University hospital, Toulouse, France.
| | - Yohan Gallois
- Department of Otology, Otoneurology and Pediatric Otolaryngology, Pierre-Paul Riquet Hospital, Toulouse University hospital, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Sergio Boetto
- Neuro-Surgery Department, CHU de Toulouse, Purpan, 31000, Toulouse, France
| | - Justine Attal
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean Sabatier
- Department of Neuroradiology, Purpan Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Rachel Debs
- Department of Neurology, Pierre-Paul Riquet/Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Olivier Deguine
- Department of Otology, Otoneurology and Pediatric Otolaryngology, Pierre-Paul Riquet Hospital, Toulouse University hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Mathieu Marx
- Department of Otology, Otoneurology and Pediatric Otolaryngology, Pierre-Paul Riquet Hospital, Toulouse University hospital, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pisani D, Gioacchini FM, Chiarella G, Astorina A, Ricciardiello F, Scarpa A, Re M, Viola P. Vestibular Impairment in Patients with Vestibular Schwannoma: A Journey through the Pitfalls of Current Literature. Audiol Res 2023; 13:285-303. [PMID: 37102775 PMCID: PMC10135541 DOI: 10.3390/audiolres13020025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Vestibular Schwannoma is the most common tumour of Ponto Cerebellar Angle and is capable of strongly impacting the patient's quality of life. In recent decades, the proposals for the management of the disease have multiplied, just as the diagnostic capacity has improved. While in the past, the primary objective was the preservation of the facial function, and subsequently also of the auditory function, the attention to the vestibular symptomatology, which appears to be one of the main indicators of deterioration of quality of life, is still unsatisfactory. Many authors have tried to provide guidance on the best possible management strategy, but a universally recognized guideline is still lacking. This article offers an overview of the disease and the proposals which have advanced in the last twenty years, evaluating their qualities and defects in a critical reading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Pisani
- Unit of Audiology, Regional Centre of Cochlear Implants and ENT Diseases, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Federico Maria Gioacchini
- Ear, Nose, and Throat Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Conca 71, 60020 Ancona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Chiarella
- Unit of Audiology, Regional Centre of Cochlear Implants and ENT Diseases, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Alessia Astorina
- Unit of Audiology, Regional Centre of Cochlear Implants and ENT Diseases, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | - Alfonso Scarpa
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy
| | - Massimo Re
- Ear, Nose, and Throat Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Conca 71, 60020 Ancona, Italy
| | - Pasquale Viola
- Unit of Audiology, Regional Centre of Cochlear Implants and ENT Diseases, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Evaluating growth trends of residual sporadic vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurooncol 2022; 159:135-150. [PMID: 35761159 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04051-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gross total resection remains the gold-standard approach for vestibular schwannomas (VS) when surgery is indicated. In select cases, incomplete resection (IR) becomes a desired alternative to preserve the facial nerve function and the patient's quality of life. While a lot of earlier studies described incompletely resected sporadic VSs as dormant, more recent studies reported a higher growth rate following IR, therefore an evaluation of the residual VS growth rates could have important implications for the follow-up treatment protocols and provide relevant information for neurosurgeons, neuro-otologists, neuropathologists, and radiologists. Although prognostic factors predicting preoperative VS growth have been previously investigated, these factors have not been investigated following IR. Our review aims to examine the growth rate of residual sporadic VS following IR and to examine variables associated with the regrowth of residual VS. METHODS The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Six databases (MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL Plus (EBSCO), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and UK Clinical Trials Gateway (WHO ICTRP) were searched. Full-text articles analysing growth rates in at least ten patients who had residual VS after IR were assessed. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model via RevMan. RESULTS 14 studies totalling 849 patients were included in the analysis. The mean planimetric growth rate was 1.57 mm/year (range 0.16-3.81 mm/year). The mean volumetric growth rate was 281.725 mm3/year (range 17.9-530.0 mm3/year). Age, sex, pre-operative tumour size/volume, cystic tumour sub-type, MIB-1 index, and intracanalicular tumour location were not associated with residual growth. Residual tumour size/volume was statistically significant to growth (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.90, p = 0.01). Radiological re-growth occurred in an average of 26.6% of cases (range 0-54.5%). CONCLUSION From our analysis, only the residual tumour volume/size was associated with residual VS growth. Therefore, close postoperative surveillance for the first year, followed by an annual MRI scan for at least 5 years, and subsequently extended interval surveillance remains of utmost importance to monitor disease progression and provide timely surgical and adjuvant interventions. Our study shows that future work should be aimed at molecular and histological characteristics of residual VSs to aid prognostic understanding of growth.
Collapse
|
5
|
Understanding the Molecular Mechanism of Vestibular Schwannoma for Hearing Preservation Surgery: Otologists’ Perspective from Bedside to Bench. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12051044. [PMID: 35626200 PMCID: PMC9140016 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Vestibular schwannoma is a clinically benign schwannoma that arises from the vestibulocochlear nerve that causes sensorineural hearing loss. This tumor is clinically and oncologically regarded as a benign tumor as it does not metastasize or invade surrounding tissues. Despite being a benign tumor, its management is difficult and controversial due to the potential serious complications, such as irreversible sensorineural hearing loss, of current interventions. Therefore, preventing hearing loss due to the natural course of the disease and complications of surgery is a challenging issue for an otologist. Improvements have been reported recently in the treatment of vestibular schwannomas. These include advances in intraoperative monitoring systems for vestibular schwannoma surgery where the risk of hearing loss as a complication is decreased. Precise genomic analysis of the tumor would be helpful in determining the characteristics of the tumor for each patient, leading to a better hearing prognosis. These procedures are expected to help improve the treatment of vestibular schwannomas. This review summarizes recent advances in vestibular schwannoma management and treatment, especially in hearing preservation. In addition, recent advances in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying vestibular schwannomas and how these advances can be applied in clinical practice are outlined and discussed, respectively. Moreover, the future directions from the bedside to the bench side are presented from the perspective of otologists.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lopez J, Hamill EB, Burnstine M. Orbital schwannoma management: a case report, literature review, and potential paradigm shift. Orbit 2022; 41:15-27. [PMID: 33397169 DOI: 10.1080/01676830.2020.1858431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To present a case of orbital schwannoma and assess the literature on treatment modalities. METHODS A MEDLINE literature search for cases of orbital schwannomas was performed using the PubMed search tool using the search terms "orbital schwannoma" and "orbital neurilemmoma." Papers were included if they were peer-reviewed, published in English, discussed management, and included the search terms. Each article was rated using the scale developed by the British Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. In addition, we present a case report of an orbital schwannoma. RESULTS A total of 428 articles were found. 102 met the criteria for inclusion. Only two articles met Level 1 evidence and 16 were important to the clinical care process. We report a case of a biopsy-proven orbital schwannoma managed conservatively with observation over a 4-year period due to risk of cosmetic disfigurement with tumor removal. There has been no change in tumor size and no associated complications during follow up. CONCLUSIONS There is a paucity of data on the natural history of orbital schwannomas. Based on our review of the literature, we recommend observation for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic orbital schwannomas with minimal growth over an extended period of time. For rapidly growing tumors or large tumors affecting key structures causing visual loss, diplopia, aesthetic disfigurement, or patient discomfort, a more aggressive approach may be necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Lopez
- Roski Eye Institute, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Eric B Hamill
- Roski Eye Institute, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern Califonrnia, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael Burnstine
- Roski Eye Institute, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern Califonrnia, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Otalgia, otorrhea and hearing loss are the most common ear-related symptoms that lead to the consultation of an otolaryngologist. Furthermore, balance disorders and affections of the cranial nerve function may play a role in the consultation. In large academic centres, but also in primary care, the identification of rare diseases of the middle ear and the lateral skull base is essential, as these diseases often require interdisciplinary approaches to establish the correct diagnosis and to initiate safe and adequate treatments. This review provides an overview of rare bone, neoplastic, haematological, autoimmunological and infectious disorders as well as malformations that may manifest in the middle ear and the lateral skull base. Knowledge of rare disorders is an essential factor ensuring the quality of patient care, in particular surgical procedures. Notably, in untypical, complicated, and prolonged disease courses, rare differential diagnoses need to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora M. Weiss
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie
„Otto Körner“ der Universitätsmedizin Rostock,
Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mohamad J, Simgen A. [Acoustic neuromas : Differential diagnoses]. Radiologe 2021; 60:1018-1025. [PMID: 32995935 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-020-00751-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
CLINICAL ISSUE Acoustic neuromas in adults are the most common infratentorial tumors that originate from the Schwann's cells of the vestibular part of the eighth cranial nerve and are clinically noticeable through neurological deficits, such as unilateral hypoacusis, tinnitus, dizziness and unilateral facial nerve palsy. Due to the widespread use of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), acoustic neuromas can now be diagnosed with a high rate of sensitivity and specificity; however, there are a number of possible differential diagnoses, such as meningioma, epidermoid and metastases as well as a number of less common diagnoses, such as peripheral nerve sheath tumors, sarcoidosis/neuritis and lipomas, which are sometimes difficult to distinguish from acoustic neuromas. Particularly smaller findings can often only be differentiated with the aid of a histopathological investigation. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS Small intrameatal and asymptomatic acoustic neuromas, some of which are discovered as incidental findings, do not require immediate treatment and should instead be monitored by MRI. Larger findings that are symptomatic and thus cause a number of severe neurological symptoms that are stressful for the patient, should be surgically removed. In cases where surgical treatment is not possible or for smaller symptomatic findings, radiotherapy can also be considered as an alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Mohamad
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Straße 1, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Touska P, Connor S. Imaging of the temporal bone. Clin Radiol 2020; 75:658-674. [DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
10
|
Urban MJ, Moore DM, Kwarta K, Leonetti J, Rajasekhar R, Gluth MB, Wiet RM. Ipsilateral Cochlear Implantation in the Presence of Observed and Irradiated Vestibular Schwannomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2020; 129:1229-1238. [PMID: 32551844 DOI: 10.1177/0003489420935482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Historically, eventual loss of cochlear nerve function has limited patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) to auditory brainstem implants (ABI), which in general are less effective than modern cochlear implants (CI). Our objective is to evaluate hearing outcomes following ipsilateral cochlear implantation in patients with NF2 and irradiated vestibular schwannomas (VS), and sporadic VS that have been irradiated or observed. METHODS Multi-center retrospective analysis of ipsilateral cochlear implantation in the presence of observed and irradiated VS. MESH search in NCBI PubMed database between 1992 and 2019 for reported cases of cochlear implantation with unresected vestibular schwannoma. RESULTS Seven patients underwent ipsilateral cochlear implantation in the presence of observed or irradiated vestibular schwannomas. Four patients had sporadic tumors with severe-profound contralateral hearing loss caused by presbycusis/hereditary sensorineural hearing loss, and three patients with NF2 lost contralateral hearing after prior surgical resection. Prior to implantation, one VS was observed without growth for a period of 7 years and the others were treated with radiotherapy. Mean post-operative sentence score was 63.9% (range 48-91) at an average of 28 (range 2-84) months follow up. All patients in this cohort obtained open set speech perception. While analysis of the literature is limited by heterogenous data reporting, 85% of implants with observed schwannomas achieved some open set perception, and 67% of patients previously radiated schwannomas. Furthermore, blending literature outcomes for post implantation sentence testing in quiet without lip-reading show 59.0 ± 35% for patients with CI and observed tumors and 55.7 ± 35% for patients with radiated tumors, with both groups ranging 0 to 100%. CONCLUSION This retrospective series and literature review highlight that hearing outcomes with CI for VS patients are superior to those achieved with ABI. However, important considerations including imaging, delayed hearing loss, and observation time cannot be ignored in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Urban
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Dennis M Moore
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Keri Kwarta
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John Leonetti
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Rebecca Rajasekhar
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Michael B Gluth
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - R Mark Wiet
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|