Psychological factors predicting patients' risk of relapse after enrollment in drug use treatment: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Despite high rates of relapse after treatment for drug use, to our knowledge there is no systematic literature identifying psychological factors that predict risk of relapse to drug use (excluding alcohol or tobacco). Our aim was to identify psychological factors that predict risk of relapse to drug use after enrollment in drug use treatment. The identification of such factors can support treatment planning and relapse prevention.

METHODS

We searched for peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2023 in PsycINFO, PsycArticles, Web of Science, and PubMed. The inclusion criteria were: peer-reviewed publications, quantitative studies, in English, adult samples, with a prospective design, and analyses of minimum one psychological factor as predictor of relapse to drug use. All authors were involved in abstract and full-text screening, and in assessing risk of bias. The findings are presented in a narrative synthesis and tables are organized by type of drug.

RESULTS

Of 2226 publications initially identified, 45 were eligible. Twenty-three focused on predicting relapse to stimulants, 15 to opioids, and 7 to unspecified drugs. Substance use at baseline was an important factor predicting risk of relapse to opioids, and possibly stimulants. There was an indication that craving and attention problems potentially predict relapse to use of some drugs. Mental health factors (e.g., psychiatric diagnosis) did not predict relapse. Several psychological factors (e.g., cognition, emotion, personality, motivation) were scarcely examined. Over half of the studies had moderate to high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the 45 studies, few psychological factors predicted risk of relapse to drug use. Higher comparability between studies and more rigorous methodology are necessary in order to derive more precise recommendations that inform and improve clinical practice.

PRE-REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42020182839.

The influence of family and social problems on treatment outcomes of persons with co-occurring substance use disorders and PTSD

OBJECTIVE

Family and social problems may contribute to negative recovery outcomes in patients with co-occurring substance use and psychiatric disorders, yet few studies have empirically examined this relationship. This study investigates the impact of family and social problems on treatment outcomes among patients with co-occurring substance use and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

METHOD

A secondary analysis was conducted using data collected from a randomized controlled trial of an integrated therapy for patients with co-occurring substance use and PTSD. Substance use, psychiatric symptoms, and social problems were assessed. Longitudinal outcomes were analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) and multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

At baseline, increased family and social problems were associated with more severe substance use and psychiatric symptoms. Over time, all participants had comparable decreases in substance use and psychiatric problem severity. However, changes in family and social problem severity were predictive of PTSD symptom severity, alcohol use, and psychiatric severity at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with co-occurring substance use and PTSD, family and social problem severity is associated with substance use and psychiatric problem severity at baseline and over time. Targeted treatment for social and family problems may be optimal.

Correlated outcomes of a pilot intervention for people injecting drugs and their family members in Vietnam

BACKGROUND

The interrelationship between the well-being of injecting drug users (IDUs) and their family environment has been widely documented. However, few intervention programs have addressed the needs of both IDUs and their family members.

METHODS

This study describes a randomized intervention pilot targeting 83 IDUs and 83 of their family members from four communes in Phú Thọ province, Vietnam. The IDUs and family members in the intervention condition received multiple group sessions, with the intent to improve psychological well-being and family relationships. The intervention outcomes (depressive symptoms and family relations) were evaluated at baseline, 3-month and 6-month follow-up assessments.

RESULTS

Depressive symptoms and family relations reported by IDUs were found to be correlated to those reported by their family members. Overall, significant intervention effects on depressive symptoms and family relations were observed for both IDUs and family members. A similar improvement pattern in family relations emerged for both the IDU and family member samples, although the intervention effect of reducing depressive symptoms was more sustainable for family members at the 6-month assessment when compared to the IDU sample.

CONCLUSION

The intervention pilot addressed challenges faced by IDUs and their family members and revealed correlated outcomes for the two groups. Findings suggest a vital need to include family members in future drug prevention and harm reduction intervention efforts.